Ohio Eastern Star Hlth Care Ctr The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 81 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-02-27 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed medical record review, review of medication prescribing information, facility policy and procedure review and interview, the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error from occurring involving Resident #75 related to the administration of prescribed narcotic pain medication. Actual Harm occurred on 01/13/25 at 12:25 A.M. when Registered Nurse (RN) #201 administered Morphine Concentrate Solution, with a concentration strength of 100 milligrams (mg) per five milliliters (ml) (100 mg/5 ml), five milliliters (100 mg) to Resident #75, who had an order to receive 15 mg every eight hours. Following the identification of the significant medication error, the on-call physician was notified and Narcan (reversal agent) nasal spray was administered. As a result of the medication overdose, Resident #75 experienced tingling to the right side of the body with random spastic movements, chills (complaints of being cold) with clammy skin and diarrhea and required increased monitoring. This affected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store food in a sanitary manner and failed to maintain sanitary conditions while serving food. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility, who received meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 70.Findings Include:1. An observation on 02/10/26 at 7:57 A.M. revealed in the reach-in freezer there was an opened cardboard box of exposed frozen egg patties in an opened plastic bag, an opened cardboard box of exposed frozen pre-made biscuits in an opened plastic bag, and an opened cardboard box of exposed beef patties in an opened plastic bag. An interview on 02/10/26 at 7:45 A.M. with dietary cook (DC) #208 confirmed the opened cardboard box of exposed frozen egg patties in an opened plastic bag, the opened cardboard box of exposed frozen pre-made biscuits in an opened plastic bag, and the opened cardboard box of exposed beef patties in an opened plastic bag. DC #208 stated the plastic bags should be closed and the box should be closed after being…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of menus, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prepare and serve appropriate portions of food during meal service. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 14 residents residing in the Lily neighborhood. The facility census was 70.Findings Include:Review of the portion size chart kept at each neighborhood serving station revealed the following requirements for portion sizes: 4 oz for fruits, vegetables, regular meats, desserts, and pureed meats with bread worked in; 3 oz for pureed sides, desserts, meats, ground meats, and pureed fruits and veggies; and 5 1/3 oz regular, mech soft, pureed casseroles.Review of the weekly menu revealed there were no portion sizes noted for each food item.An observation on 02/11/26 from 11:30 A.M. to 11:50 A.M revealed Dietary Server (DS) #202 preparing to serve lunch meal for residents in the Lily neighborhood. Per the weekly menu, lunch meal consisted of chipped beef on toast, cooked carrots, cooked green beans, mandarin oranges, and as substitute meal cabbage soup and a tuna salad…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician when Resident #15 missed doses of medication and failed to notify the family/power of attorney (POA) and physician of Resident #74's transfer to the hospital. This affected two residents (#15 and #74) of 20 records reviewed. The facility census was 70.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/17/24 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, insomnia, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #15's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #15's physician order dated 11/05/24 revealed an order for Brillinta 90 milligrams (mg) twice a day. Review of Resident #15's Medication Administration Record for 02/01/26 to 02/11/26 revealed Brillinta was not administered on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to maintain Resident #56's privacy when a video monitor, monitoring his room, was kept in the common area. This affected one resident (#56) of one resident reviewed for privacy. The facility census was 70.Findings include: Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/03/26 with diagnoses including fracture of right pubis, unspecified dementia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, depression, anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease, and repeated falls. Review of Resident #56's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #56's physician order dated 01/04/26 revealed a video monitoring device was to be in place for fall prevention.Observation on 02/10/26 at 9:16 A.M. of Resident #56's unit revealed when entering the unit through the door there was a main common area with several recliners facing the television. The television was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention strategies were in place for Resident #15 prior to a fall. This affected one resident (#15) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 70.Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/17/24 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, and cognitive communication deficit.Review of Resident #15's fall event dated 10/14/24 revealed she had a fall while transferring off the commode.Review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and required partial to moderate assistance with toileting hygiene and supervision or touching assistance with toilet transfers. Review of Resident #15's plan of care dated 07/10/25 revealed the resident was at risk for falls, accidents, and injury related to admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly store medications for Resident #9. This affected one resident (#9) out of two residents reviewed for pain management and had the potential to affect two of fifteen residents the facility noted as independently ambulatory. The facility census was 70.Findings include:Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/27/24. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, low back pain, unspecified chronic back pain, poly-osteoarthritis and type II diabetes with diabetic chronic kidney disease.Review of Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 05 indicating impaired cognition. Review of Resident #9's physician orders revealed an order for Tramadol (an opioid medication) 50 milligrams (mg) four times a day due upon rising, at noon, afternoon, and at bedtime.Review of the Resident #9's comfort care plan dated 01/19/26 revealed Resident #9 experienced low back pain, pain and had osteoarthritis with a goal that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection control during wound care for Resident #50, failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for two residents. These deficient practices affected one resident (Resident #50) out of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers and affected two residents (Residents #56 and #78) out of five residents reviewed for transmission based precautions. The facility census was 70.Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/15/25 with diagnoses including but not limited stage four (IV) sacral pressure ulcer with osteomyelitis, type two diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure, and chronic pain. Review of Resident #50's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out a possible 15 and required staff assistance with self-care and mobility. Review of Resident #50's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of facility policy, and review of McGeer's criteria, revealed the facility failed to follow antibiotic stewardship for two residents (#10 and #15) of seven residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 70.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/17/24 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, and cognitive communication deficit.Review of Resident #15's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition.Review of Resident #15's progress note dated 01/09/26 revealed the nurse assessed a skin issue to the residents' right inner thigh. The area was hard to the touch, large in measurement, and raised with no discoloration. Resident #15 only reported pain in the area when it was touched. An additional progress note on 01/09/26 revealed the Certified Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to appropriately revise and implement individualized treatment and services to ensure residents, who displayed behaviors and/or were diagnosed with dementia received the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. The facility failed to appropriately address Resident #73's dementia-related behaviors. This affected one (Resident #73) of three residents reviewed for dementia. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #73 was admitted on [DATE] and expired on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vascular dementia, anxiety disorder, depression, and dysphagia. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 had moderately impaired cognitive skills. The MDS also revealed Resident #73 had verbal behaviors directed towards others. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #67 who was elopement risk did not leave the facility unsupervised. This affected one resident (#67) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 10/17/23 with diagnoses including dementia, pain, insomnia, depression, hyperlipidemia, and anxiety. Review of Resident #67's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she had a severe cognitive impairment and had wandered during the lookback period. Review of Resident #67's plan of care initiated 11/12/23 and revised 08/19/23 revealed the resident was at risk for elopement due to wandering off of her neighborhood (unit), diagnosis of dementia, and being found outside of the neighborhood on 08/07/24. Interventions were dated 11/12/23 and included wanderguard to the right ankle, checking the placement of the wanderguard every shift, redirecting the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH