No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Newark Nursing & Rehab

75 McMillen Drive, Newark, OH 43055 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 145 certified beds · (740) 344-0357 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 344-0357 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0744, F0758)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568, F0569)
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
120 McMillen Dr · (220) 564-7985 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1555 W Main St · (740) 522-9761 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1890 Cherry Valley Rd · (740) 522-8260 · Call to confirm hours
Park
125 N 33rd St · (740) 345-8224 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.0%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.8%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms48.2%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.6%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.6%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication34.8%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.1%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.2%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.4%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.7%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine67.4%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.0%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit2.5%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.691.731.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.221.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
44.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 44.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 38 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.0%CMS range 35.1–59.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.5–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge44.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge34.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 3.5–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.32
RN hours/ resident / day
1.15
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.13
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.60
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
40.6%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 122.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-21)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gdisputed · IDR2026-06-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the medical record, review of the ambulatory wound clinic notes, review of the pharmacy delivery slips, review of the facility policy, review of facility emails, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive initial wound assessment for a new wound was completed, wound treatments were completed as ordered, the physician was notified of absent dressings, wound interventions were in place and initiated timely, the wound was adequately assessed for appropriate wound staging, imaging services were completed as ordered, and infection control was maintained during wound care, to prevent the in-house development and/or worsening of a pressure ulcer to the coccyx of Resident #01. Actual harm occurred on 02/21/26 when Resident #01, who was assessed to be at risk for developing pressure ulcers, had moderately impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living including turning and repositioning, and was non-ambulatory, was identified to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-08-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an adequate stock of controlled substances were on-hand to adequately treat pain. This affected two residents, Resident #46 and Resident #65.Actual Harm occurred when the facility failed to ensure scheduled pain medication was reordered timely and available for Resident #65 and Resident #46. Resident #65's pain medication was not documented as administered on 08/09/25, 08/10/25, 08/11/25, and 08/12/25 leading to Resident #65 reporting pain, rating the pain a ten on a one to ten scale, with 10 being the worst pain ever experienced. Resident #65's pain medication was not documented as administered and on 08/11/25 at 10:43 A.M. and 12:01 P.M., Resident #46 reported constant and intense pain in the legs where an amputation had been performed. Resident #46 rated his pain at a level of 1000 out of ten on the numeric pain scale and complained he could not get out of bed. Resident #46 resident reported the nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility water temperature logs, review of the facility policy, and interview, the facility failed to maintain appropriate water temperatures on the hallway with rooms including Room Numbers 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 473, 474, 475, and 476. This affected four residents (#22, #38, #57, and #61) out of four residents reviewed for environment, and had the potential to affect all 10 residents (#3, #9, #12 #22, #36, #38, #49, #57, #61, and #87) on the 100 and 400 hallway. Findings Include: Review of the weekly tap water temperature logs from 03/07/26 through 06/13/26 revealed no temperature or room number were documented it just indicated the temperatures were checked and were within normal limits.Observation on 06/13/26 at 8:50 A.M. revealed the public restrooms tap water appeared to be hot and the surveyor was unable to hold hands under the water safely.Observation on 06/13/26 from 9:00 A.M. through 9:10 A.M. of water temperatures on the 100 and 400 hallway, which was one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-13 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide resident and resident representatives with written notice of discharge. This affected one (Resident #116) of three residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 115 residents. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #116 revealed an admission date of 03/19/26 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, chronic kidney disease, and mood disorder and a discharge date of 04/13/26. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #116 dated 03/25/26 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the discharge not anticipated MDS assessment for Resident #116 dated 04/13/26 revealed the resident was discharged from the facility. Review of the hospice note for Resident #116 dated 03/18/26 revealed the resident was being admitted to the facility for permanent placement. Review of the hospice note for Resident #116 dated 04/07/26 revealed Resident #116's wife had called hospice saying the facility stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-13 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to implement behavioral management interventions for dementia residents. This affected one (Resident #116) of three residents reviewed for behavior management. The facility census was 115 residents.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #116 revealed an admission date of 03/19/26 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, chronic kidney disease, and mood disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #116 dated 04/13/26 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), received antianxiety and antidepressant medications, and exhibited verbal and physical behavioral symptoms. Review of the care plan for Resident #116 revealed the resident had behavior problems related to Alzheimer's disease which included wandering and physical and verbal aggression towards other residents. Interventions included staff should administer psychotropic medications as ordered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene during care. This affected two residents (Resident #58 and #74) of the three residents reviewed for wounds and incontinence care. The facility census was 115 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 04/28/26 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #58 dated 04/07/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required staff assistance with toiletingReview of the physician's order for Resident #58 revealed an order dated 05/02/26 for wound care to the left lower extremity to cleanse with normal saline or wound cleanser, apply adaptic to the wound bed, cover with two abdominal (ABD) pads, wrap with Kerlix and secure with tape daily and as needed until…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility did not provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment by maintaining the building in good repair. This had the potential to affect all 120 residents living in the facility. The facility census was 120. Observation of the facility on 03/02/26 at 8:37A.M. to 9:39 A.M. revealed the following: -Observation of the 600-unit resident shower room revealed there was cracked tiles along the wall directly adjoining the floor. The cracked tiles were on the far wall from the desk area and around the toilet. There was a black and brown substance on eleven tiles to the left of the toilet and two cracked tiles, one cracked tile which was the fifth tile up the wall next to the inoperable shower which had equipment in it and rust on the facet handles. The shower room sink was leaking water and did not turn off. The shower nearest to the door had black and brown substances in the grout nearest the floor and cracked tiles adjoining the floor.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent (%). The facility had two medication errors of 34 opportunities for an error rate of 5.8%. This affected two Residents (#50 and #545) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 120 residents. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 08/20/19 with diagnoses to include but not limited to type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, muscle weakness, diastolic heart failure, chronic pancreatitis, toxic liver disease, cardiomyopathy, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, spinal stenosis, need for assistance with personal care, vascular disease, hypotension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and atrial fibrillation.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #50 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated no cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent significant medication errors when staff did not administer insulin as ordered and did not prime insulin prior to administration. This affected two (Residents #50 and #545) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 120.1.Review of the medical record for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 08/20/19 with diagnoses to include but not limited to type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, muscle weakness, diastolic heart failure, chronic pancreatitis, toxic liver disease, cardiomyopathy, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, spinal stenosis, need for assistance with personal care, vascular disease, hypotension, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, and atrial fibrillation.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #50 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. Further review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate incontinence care was provided for one Resident # 910. This affected one (Resident #910) of the three residents reviewed for incontinence care. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure staff handled medication in a sanitary way. This affected one (Resident #205) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 120.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #910 revealed an admission date of 12/24/25 with diagnoses to include, but not limited to cerebral infarction, hypertension, dementia, anorexia, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and urinary incontinence.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #910 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of six which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #910 required supervision with toileting hygiene and was occasionally incontinent with bladder and always incontinent of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-30 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, hospital record review, facility policy review, review of Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Stimulant Guide, and review of SAMHSA (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration) guidelines, the facility failed to ensure a resident with history of substance use received the appropriate care to manage his condition or attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. This affected one resident (Resident #82) of three residents reviewed for neglect.Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. The facility listed diagnoses as of [DATE] that included paraplegia, anxiety disorder, insomnia, depression, chronic pain syndrome, and peripheral vascular disease unspecified. The diagnosis list did not include substance use disorder or a drug abuse diagnosis.Review of hospital referral records dated [DATE] revealed Resident #82 had diagnosis of drug abuse, had reported current drug use of marijuana,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean kitchen environment. This had the potential to affect all 105 residents residing in the facility who received meals from the facility kitchen. The facility census was 105.Findings include: An observation made on 08/11/25 at 9:00 A.M. during the initial kitchen tour revealed a large, uncovered commercial floor stand mixer with the mixing bowl in place. The mixer bowl was observed to have dust and small pieces of paper in the bottom of the bowl. Further observation revealed a free standing reach-in refrigerator in the prep area with the right hand side door handle covered with a sticky substance and a dried white substance (similar to dried batter) which dripped from above the door handle to below the door handle on the outside of the left door. Observation of the gas-powered cooktop revealed a thick, black, crusted, and greasy substance on the flat surfaces around the burners with a dried yellow substance observed on top of the thick, black, crusted, and greasy substance between the front edge of the cooktop…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, controlled substance log review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors related to controlled medications. This affected six residents (#1, #3, #36, #62, #93, and #108) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an initial admission date of 10/06/21 with a re-entry date of 03/09/25. Diagnoses included stage three chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #1's physician order dated 03/09/25 revealed an order for Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) 5 milligram (mg) tablet, give two tablets by mouth every eight hours for pain. Review of the Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition form revealed on 08/12/25, Resident #1 received the scheduled pain medication at 5:16 A.M. and again at 9:00 P.M. Resident #1's 2:00 P.M. dose had not been administered or signed out on the log.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have resident funds available to the residents on the weekend. This affected one resident (#15) and had the potential to affect all residents with funds managed by the facility. The facility census was 105.Findings include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/10/23 and diagnoses including but not limited to diabetes, schizophrenia, other seizures, depression, bipolar disorder current episode mixed, severe, with psychotic features, anxiety disorder, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Review of Resident #15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #15's facility-managed funds account records dated June 2025 to August 2025 revealed there were no receipts for money released to Resident #15 from his facility-managed account on any weekend days. Interview on 08/12/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessments were accurately completed. This affected three residents (#7, #13, and #15) out of five residents reviewed for accurate PASARR assessments. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 02/18/2025. Diagnosis included major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), bipolar disorder, and seizures. Review of the PASARR for Resident #13 dated 01/31/25 revealed under Section E: Indication of Serious Mental Illness, that no mental disorders had been noted. Review of Resident #13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08 out of 15 indicating moderately impaired cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Resident #13 was noted to display disorganized thinking and inattention. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for Resident #2 within 48 hours of admission as required. This affected one resident (#2) of four residents reviewed for dementia care. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/04/25 and diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, and osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) due to being rarely or never understood, had behaviors of physical symptoms directed at others for four to six days during the assessment window, verbal symptoms directed toward others for one to three days during the assessment window, and rejection of care for four to six days during the assessment window.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan included comprehensive psychosocial interventions to address identified behaviors. This affected one resident (#64) out of thirty residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 105.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 05/30/25 with diagnoses including depression, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and insomnia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 was cognitively intact and has no mood or behavioral concerns.Review of the care plan dated 07/14/25 revealed the resident was known to make inappropriate and sexual comments to staff. Interventions included one-on-one supervision, every 15-minute and 30-minute checks as needed for safety of both this resident and others, referral to psych as needed, and staff monitoring for any inappropriate behaviors.Interview on 08/18/25 at 3:52 P.M. with Resident #64 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure care plans had been revised to accurately reflect enhanced barrier precautions and fluid restrictions had been discontinued. This affected two residents (#24 and #66) of 30 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 105.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an initial admission date of 08/09/24 and a re-entry date of 07/11/25. Diagnoses included chronic systolic heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and atrial fibrillation. Review of Resident #24's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 out of 15 indicating a severely impaired cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Review of the undated care plan revealed Resident #24 required enhanced barrier precautions for infection prevention. Observations completed on 08/11/25 at 10:00 A.M. and again on 08/19/25 at 11:00 A.M. revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place. This affected two residents (#1 and #43) of five residents reviewed for fall safety. The facility census was 105. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an initial admission date of 10/06/21 and a re-entry date of 03/09/25. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of the lower extremities, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the physician orders for Resident #1 dated 02/25/25 revealed an order for the resident's bed to be in the lowest position when occupied. Review of the care plan dated 03/10/25 for Resident #1 revealed this resident was at risk for falls related to medication use, decrease mobility, non-ambulatory, and obesity comorbidities. Fall interventions included to be sure the call light is in reach, bed in lower position when occupied, and to follow facility fall protocol. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were implemented upon dietician and dialysis center recommendations for Resident #6. Additionally, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent further weight loss for Resident #35. The affected two residents (#6 and #35) out of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 105. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 02/25/22 with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease, type two diabetes mellitus, gastroesophageal reflux disease, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and hypo-osmolality with hyponatremia. Review of the care plan dated 09/28/23 revealed Resident #6 was at risk for altered nutrition and hydration related to body mass index (BMI), therapeutic diet, and weight changes with fluid balance. The resident was noted to refuse facility weights, had a history of hospice care, and was known to refuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #79's medical record included a physician order for hemodialysis treatments. This affected one resident (#79) of two residents reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 105.Findings include: Review of Resident #79's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/26/25 and diagnoses including but not limited to orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, end stage renal disease, congestive heart failure, diabetes, left above the knee amputation, dependence on renal dialysis, hypertension, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #79's Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating the resident had intact cognition. Resident #79's MDS indicated the resident had rejected care one to three days in the MDS review window, the resident was independent with eating and was dependent for all other activities of daily living, was always incontinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician visited residents at the required frequency. This affected one resident (#2) of four residents sampled for dementia care. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/04/25 and diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, and osteoarthritis. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment due to being rarely or never understood, had behaviors of physical symptoms directed at others for four to six days during the assessment window, verbal symptoms directed toward others for one to three days during the assessment window, and rejection of care for four to six days during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations that were addressed by the physician were implemented in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#43) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an initial admission date of 04/05/24 and a re-entry date of 07/27/24. Diagnoses included vascular dementia with moderate mood disturbances, mood disorder, and anxiety. Review of physician orders for Resident #43 revealed an order dated 05/16/25 for Lorazepam (also known as Ativan, an antianxiety medication) 0.5 milligram (mg) tablet, give 0.5 mg by mouth every six hours as needed for anxiety and restlessness. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 05/19/25 revealed the resident was presently prescribed Lorazepam (Ativan) 0.5 mg by mouth every 6 hours as needed for anxiety. The form included a recommendation to please document duration and rationale for extended therapy of the as-needed order. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospice records, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure hospice records were available for review to allow for effective collaboration between the facility and the hospice provider. This affected one resident (#43) of one resident reviewed for hospice care. The facility census was 105. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an initial admission date of 04/05/25 and a re-entry date of 07/27/24. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, cerebral atherosclerosis, disorders of the bone density and structure, and hypertension. Review of Resident #43's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09 out of 15 indicating severely impaired cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Interview on 08/19/25 at 12:49 P.M. with a hospice staff member revealed Resident #43 was planned to received Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) services three times…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #75's wound and living space were free from pests. This affected one resident (#75) of six residents sampled for wounds. The facility census was 105. Findings include: Review of Resident #75's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/31/05 and diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of head and face, squamous cell carcinoma, autistic disorder, diabetes, anxiety disorder, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, and non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of left lower leg with other specified severity. Review of Resident #75's Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change in status assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating the resident was cognitively intact and had no recorded behaviors. Further review revealed Resident #75 required set up assistance for eating and was dependent on staff for all other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed in the areas of diabetes, depression, anticoagulants, activities, and skin picking behaviors. This affected five residents (#2, #33, #56, #84, and #85) of thirty residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/07/24 with diagnoses including respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, other chronic pain, type two diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, and fibromyalgia. Review of Resident #56's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #56's physician orders dated 06/07/24 revealed an order for Insulin Glargine Subcutaneous (sq)Solution Pen-injector 100 units per milliliter (ml). Sixty units…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interview, and review of scheduled activities, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered or assisted in attending activities and failed to provide activities as scheduled. This affected four (#14, #22, #406, #52) of five residents reviewed for participation in activities. The facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 7/10/2019, Diagnoses included moyamoya disease, hemiplegia, history of a cerebral infarction, and a left hand contractor. Review of Resident #52's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely impaired, had a memory problem, untied a wheelchair, and had an upper extremity impairment. Review of Resident #52's Care Plan dated 07/28/24 revealed the resident had impaired cognitive function related to confusion, poor safety awareness, and a cerebrovascular accident. Interventions included to encourage the resident to participate in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, review of lunch meal tickets, review of the dietary spreadsheet, review of the menu, review of the emergency food menu, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Residents #22 and #33) received all the foods as ordered according to their meal tickets and the facility failed to ensure there was an emergency food stock in a designated area of the facility. The deficient practices affected two residents (Residents #22 and #33) and had the potential to affect all of the residents who resided at the facility, except Resident #93 who had an ordered nothing by mouth (NPO) diet. The facility census was 102. Findings Include: Review of the daily menu for the lunch meal on Tuesday, 08/27/24, revealed the planned meal was barbecue cheeseburgers on a bun with lettuce, tomato, and a pickle spear, confetti coleslaw, French fries with ketchup, and an oatmeal raisin cookie. Review of the dietary spreadsheet for the lunch meal on Tuesday, 08/27/24, revealed for a resident on an ordered renal diet, the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pureed foods were prepared to an appropriate texture, requiring surveyor intervention. The deficient practice had the potential to affect four residents (Residents #8, 22, 46, and 60) who had an ordered pureed diet. The facility census was 102. Findings Include: Observation on 08/27/24 at 10:23 A.M. of the preparation of pureed foods with [NAME] #201 revealed the cook placed six barbecue hamburgers into the blender and started blending. At 10:36 A.M., [NAME] #201 stopped the blender and poured the pureed barbecue hamburgers into a silver serving dish. [NAME] #201 tasted the pureed food item and confirmed she felt it was an appropriate at serve to the residents. There was no other staff present at the time of the observation to taste the pureed food. At 10:38 A.M., this surveyor tasted the pureed barbecue hamburgers and found there were dime size bits of gristle or fat in the food. Interview on 08/27/24 at 10:39 A.M. with [NAME] #201 confirmed the pureed barbecue hamburgers were not an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the arbitration agreement and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement notified residents of their right to rescind the agreement within 30 days. The deficient practice affected 51 residents (Residents #2, 6, 10, 11, 14, 16, 21, 22, 29, 31, 34, 35, 42, 43, 44, 47, 48, 50, 51, 56, 58, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73 74, 77, 78, 79, 81, 82, 83, 84, 86, 87, 88, 89, 91, 92, 97, 98, 100, 101, 405, 406, 407, and 409) who agreed to enter into the arbitration agreement. The facility census was 102. Findings Include: Review of the facility Arbitration Agreement, Agreement to Resolve Legal Disputes through Binding Arbitration, undated, revealed the agreement did not inform residents of their right to rescind the agreement within 30 days of signing the agreement. Interview on 08/27/24 at 5:02 P.M. with the Admissions Director (AD) #205 confirmed the agreement did not include the above information. AD #205 stated the facility's corporate office developed the agreement for the facility and she was not aware the agreement did not include all of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #406 was clean shaven, as preferred. This affected one resident (#406) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of Resident #406's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/09/24 with diagnoses including chronic venous hypertension, chronic systolic heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, dysphagia and hypertension. Review of Resident #406's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. He required substantial or maximal assistance with personal hygiene. Further review of Resident #406's medical record revealed the last documented evidence of Resident #406 being shaved was with a bed bath on 08/19/24 when it was indicated CNA #234 shaved the resident. Observation on 08/25/24 at 2:59 P.M. and 08/27/24 at 9:08 A.M. revealed Resident #406 was unshaven with heavy stubble…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure skin assessments and monitoring were completed. This affected two residents (#3 and #84) of three residents reviewed for skin conditions. The facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #84's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/10/2023. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, pruritus, and paresthesia of the skin. Observation on 08/25/24 at 10:47 A.M. revealed Resident #84 lying in bed. His bilateral arms and left leg were observed to have numerous open and closed scabbed areas some noted to be as large as a dime. Some of the areas were noted to have a scant amount of blood surrounding the areas. The resident was observed to be picking at his skin areas. The resident reported that he feels like he is always itching and picks at his arms and legs constantly due to the itching. Review of Resident #84's After Visit Dermatology Summery dated 08/20/24 revealed the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #52 was given the opportunity to wear her recommended palm guard. This affected one resident (#52) of one residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM). The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 7/10/2019. Diagnoses included moyamoya disease, hemiplegia, history of a cerebral infarction, and a left-hand contractor. Review of Resident #52's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition, had a memory problem, utilized a wheelchair, and had an upper extremity impairment. Review of Resident #52's Care Plan dated 07/28/24 revealed the resident had potential for pain related to a left-hand contracture. Interventions included a left-hand palm guard to be place on in morning and be taken off at night. The care plan also stated the resident has an activity of daily livings self-care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, medical record review, and facility investigation review the facility failed to maintain adequate supervision to ensure Resident #78 did not leave the facility's secured unit and complete a thorough investigation into her unsupervised departure from the secured unit. The facility also failed to ensure a safe environment for Resident #29. This affected two (Resident #29 and Resident #78) of seven residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 11/10/2022. Diagnoses include cerebral infarction, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, and dementia. Review of Resident #78's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a severe cognitive impairment. The resident could independently ambulate. Review of Resident #72's care plan dated 6/27/2024 revealed the resident is at high risk for elopement related to dementia. The care plan was initiated on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review revealed the facility failed to provide timely treatment for Resident #85's urinary tract infection (UTI). This affected one resident (#85) of four residents reviewed for UTI's. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of Resident #85's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/10/23 with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, encephalopathy, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, cognitive social or emotional deficit, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis. Review of Resident #85's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was rarely or never understood. He had a urinary catheter. Review of Resident #85's progress note dated 07/27/24 revealed Resident #85 had Clostridium difficile (C. Diff) and a new order was placed for Vancomycin 125 milligrams (mg) four times a day for five days. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to care plan and implement interventions for Resident #86's autism and failed to monitor and effectively treat his anxiety. This affected one resident (#86) of three reviewed for mood and behaviors. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of Resident #86's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/15/23 with diagnoses including autistic disorder, dysphagia, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety disorder, depressive disorder, Barrett's esophagus, gastroparesis, and diaphragmatic hernia. Review of Resident #86's plan of care dated 03/28/23 revealed the potential for adverse side effects of psychotropic drug use related to antianxiety medication. Interventions included documenting the side effects of medication, notifying the physician of any mental status changes that occur, observing and documenting any abnormal behavior or moods, and observing and reporting any signs of drug related complications. Review of the Preadmission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and review of medical records the facility failed to ensure #56 who was on anticoagulants were monitored for side effects of the medication and had care plans in place for the anticoagulant. This affected one resident (#56) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 102. Findings include: Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/07/24 with diagnoses including respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, other chronic pain, type two diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, and fibromyalgia. Review of Resident #56's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #56's physician order dated 06/07/24 revealed an order for Apixaban (an anticoagulant) oral tablet five milligrams twice a day. Review of Resident #56's physician's orders revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review revealed the facility failed to monitor behaviors for Residents' #22, #56, and #306 who were receiving psychotropic medications. This affected three residents (#22, #56, and #306) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #22's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/01/24 with diagnoses including pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, dysphagia, type two diabetes mellitus, unspecified intellectual disabilities, peripheral vascular disease, anxiety disorder, epilepsy, unspecified dementia with anxiety, depression, and hypertension. Review of Resident #22's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #22's plan of care dated 08/01/24 revealed he used psychotropic medications related to disease process. Interventions included administering medications as ordered, discussing with physician and family need…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, manufacturer guidelines, and facility policy review the facility failed to remove expired medications and securely store multi-use insulin vials. This deficient practice had the potential to affect any resident requesting flu vaccination, any new admission requiring tuberculosis (TB) testing, and affected one resident (Resident #84) out of four residents reviewed during medication administration. The facility census was 102. Findings Include: a) An observation on 08/26/24 at 10:09 A.M. revealed in Unit one's medication storage refrigerator an opened multi-use vial of Tubersol (tuberculosis (TB)) solution with out an opened date on either the vial or the packaging box. The TB solution had an expiration date of 04/2007 and had been dispensed from the pharmacy on 02/24/24. Interview on 08/26/24 at 10:09 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #290 confirmed the opened multi-use TB solution vial without an opened date. LPN #290 stated once the vial was opened it could only be used for 30 days and then was to be disposed. Review of the manufacturer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was conducted during meal service, and failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) were implemented. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents residing on the Memory Unit and had affected two residents (Resident #62 and #406) out two residents reviewed for EBP implementation. The facility census was 102. Findings Include: An observation on 08/26/24 at 8:18 A.M. during breakfast meal service on the Memory Unit revealed State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) #224 and #244 serving the meal trays to residents sitting in the dining room on the memory unit. Observation of STNA #244 adjusting clothing several times after bending over the table to assist the resident with food preparation and then returning to the food tray cart and removing another meal tray from the cart and serving the tray to the resident. STNA #244 was not observed sanitizing or washing hands after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional home like environment. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #29) out of four residents reviewed for environment. Findings Include: An observation on 08/25/24 at 2:10 P.M. revealed in Resident #29's room the rubber toe plate covering at the bottom of the wall under the sink was loose and falling off the wall revealing moderate sized hole approximately three feet long extending from the end of the wall to the corner of the two walls. The hole was approximately two inches wide and was deep enough for the dry wall material and the wall support boards to be exposed. The rubber toe plate covering was also falling off the shorter wall to the right of the sink exposing the dry wall material behind the rubber toe plate covering. A review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed admission date 12/04/21 with diagnoses including cancer of the head, face, and neck, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type two diabetes mellitus, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of the grievance log, review of a fall investigation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely notify one resident's (Resident #101) representative of a fall resulting in hospitalization. This affected one (Resident #101) of three residents reviewed for notification of changes. The facility census was 95. Findings Include: Review of the closed medical record for former Resident #101 revealed an initial admission date on 01/15/14, a readmission date on 04/16/16, and a discharge date on 01/03/24 due to passing away. Medical diagnoses included dementia with behavioral disturbance, traumatic subdural hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, weakness, unsteadiness on feet, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit, anxiety disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of Resident #101's profile revealed the resident's daughter was the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-10-19 · tag F0568 — widespread
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on financial record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain resident financial records according to established standards. This affected 64 (Residents #19, #31, #86, #8, #81, #47, #1, #58, #21, #7, #53, #45, #10, #18, #39, #85, #36, #67, #74, #49, #2, #6, #69, #51, #34, #44, #80, #60, #5, #11, #77, #50, #88, #66, #55, #79, #75, #89, #90, #76, #32, #72, #40, #17, #38, #64, #28, #91, #71, #23, #70, #29, #9, #46, #78, #57, #20, #41, #92, #25, #65, #42, #13, and #43) of 64 residents who have personal funds accounts with the facility. The census was 85. Findings Include: Review of Residents #34, #80, #23, and #41 financial records revealed they did not have quarterly statements available for review. Two more residents were requested, and they were not available for review as well. Interview with Administrator on 10/12/22 at 2:27 P.M. confirmed they do not have resident fund quarterly statements for any of the residents. She confirmed they have a new business office manager, who is trying to fix things, but they currently do not have any quarterly statements of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow droplet precautions during meal pass and did not implement isolation precautions for Resident #72 as ordered. This affected seven residents (#12, #72, #73, #83, #84, #285, and #286) and had the potential to affect all 85 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on 10/11/22 from 12:15 P.M. to 12:28 P.M. of meal pass revealed State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #89 enter Resident #84's room. Resident #84 had a sign indicating droplet precautions and personal protective equipment (PPE) on his door. STNA #89 placed a meal tray on Resident #84's bedside table and moved the bedside tablet in front of him. STNA #89 was wearing an N-95 mask and eye protection. STNA #89 exited Resident #84's room, she did not sanitize her hands, replace her mask, or clean her eye protection. She then entered Resident #73's room and adjusted his pillow. STNA #89 applied a gown and gloves and entered Resident #286's room and delivered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-19 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of liability notices, review of quarterly statements, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the appropriate liability notices when their Medicare (MCR) Part A services ended and ensure a Medicaid (MCD) eligible resident received appropriate notification of charges. This affected three (Resident #32, #37, and #65) of three residents reviewed for liability notices and one (Resident #60) of one residents reviewed for resident billing and charges. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #32's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a stroke with hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) affecting the left non-dominant side, aphasia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and peripheral vascular disease. A review of Resident #32's census list revealed she had a payer change on 05/17/22 and again on 05/28/22. The census list did not specify what the change in payer status was. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure their consulting pharmacist made recommendations for gradual dose reduction (GDR) attempts with the use of psychotropic medications as required during their monthly medication regimen review. The facility also failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were followed up on or responded to timely by the physician. This affected four (Resident #4, #47, #54 and #60) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #54's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a history of a stroke with hemiplegia affecting her left non-dominant side, MoyaMoya disease (a narrowing of the blood vessels that supplied the brain with blood), aphasia, major depressive disorder, and restlessness and agitation. A review of Resident #54's active physician's orders revealed the resident had an order to receive Klonopin (an anti-anxiety medication) 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete records relating to catheter care for Resident #60, diagnoses for Resident #28, hospitalization for Resident #62, and hospice for Resident #81. This affected four residents (#28, #60, #62, and #81) of 27 records reviewed. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Observation on 10/11/22 at 4:26 P.M. revealed Resident #60 had a catheter. Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 09/14/21 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, schizophrenia, morbid obesity, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 had intact cognition. Resident #60 had an indwelling urinary catheter. Review of the plan of care dated 09/06/22 revealed Resident #60 had the potential for complications related to the use of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #60 was treated with respect and allowed to control the temperature in her room. This affected one resident (#60) of two reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Interview on 10/11/22 at 4:26 P.M. with Resident #60 revealed Agency State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #100 had been rude to her. She reported she keeps her room cold at night to aide her breathing, however, Agency STNA #100 entered her room and stated she was not going to work when it was so cold, and she turned off the air conditioning. Resident #60 reported the aide had turned off the air conditioning despite Resident #60 telling her she wanted it on, the aide then began yelling at her during transfer assistance. Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 09/14/21 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, schizophrenia, morbid obesity, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on financial record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence that spend down notifications were given as required. This affected seven (Residents #45, #34, #80, #38, #64, #23, and #41) of 64 residents who have personal funds accounts with the facility. The census was 85. Findings Include: Review of the following residents personal funds accounts revealed they had a total amount of money within $200 of the allowed amount ($2,000), and there was no evidence the facility had provided the resident with a spend down notification: Resident #45 had a current total amount of $2,121.92 in her personal funds account. Resident #34 had a current total amount of $3,210.99 in her personal funds account. Resident #80 had a current total amount of $9,187.03 in her personal funds account. Resident #38 had a current total amount of $2,509.55 in her personal funds account. Resident #64 had a current total amount of $2,146.11 in her personal funds account. Resident #23 had a current total amount of $6,345.58 in her personal funds account. Resident #41 had a current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and refusal of care policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a resident's refusal of medication. This affected one (Resident #85) of the one resident reviewed for physician notification. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an initial admission date of 06/23/16 with a re-entry date of 08/25/20 and a discharge date of 08/17/22. Diagnoses included diabetes, heart disease, heart failure, and hypertension. Review of Resident #85's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01 indicating a severely impaired cognition for daily decision making abilities with disorganized thinking. Resident #85 was noted to display physical and verbal behaviors and rejection of care. Resident #85 required extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility and transfers and extensive assistance from one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) timely for Resident #12 and accurately for Resident #28. This affected two residents (#12 and #28) of four reviewed for PASARR's. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an initial admission on [DATE], her diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease stage three, bipolar disorder, colostomy status, and mild intellectual disabilities. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #12 had impaired cognition. Review of the hospital exemption from preadmission screening notification dated 03/21/22 revealed Resident #12 had a mood disorder and a panic or other severe anxiety disorder. The document indicated the nursing facility was responsible for initiating a resident review prior to the 30th day following admission from the hospital. Review of the medical record on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had active care plans in place in the areas of contractures and oxygen use. This affected three (Resident #9, #54 and #73) of 27 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #9's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sleep apnea, and vascular dementia. A review of Resident #9's active physician's orders revealed the resident had an order in place to receive oxygen at 2 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula every shift. The order was not added to the physician's orders until 10/11/22. A review of Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues. He was able to make himself understood and was able to understand others. His cognition was moderately impaired. He was not known to display any behaviors nor was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care planning conferences were held for residents and residents and/ or their families were invited to attend. This affected two (Resident #27 and #39) of two residents reviewed for care planning conferences. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #27's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic renal failure, heart failure, adult onset diabetes mellitus and an altered mental status. A review of Resident #27's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments that had been completed revealed the resident had an admission MDS completed on 02/13/22. Quarterly MDS assessments were completed on 05/19/22 and again on 08/15/22. A review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. He was not known to display any behaviors nor was he known to reject care. He was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided assistance with showers/ bathing as desired. This affected two (Residents #9, and #20) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #9's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, muscle weakness, adult failure to thrive, unsteadiness on feet, and lack of coordination. A review of Resident #9's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed it was the resident's preference to receive a bath/ shower twice a week. It was not clear what shift or days of the week the resident preferred or was scheduled to receive that bathing activity. A review of Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and his cognition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate care for Resident #54 and Resident #73 who had contractures. This affected two residents (#54 and #73) of two residents reviewed for limited range of motion. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #73 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, encounter for attention to tracheostomy, encounter for attention to gastrostomy, metabolic encephalopathy, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #73 was rarely or never understood. The resident had a limitation in range of motion (ROM) of both sides of her upper and lower extremities. Review of the plan of care revealed it did not address Resident #73's contractures. Review of the physician's order dated 10/07/22 revealed an order to apply hand and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review revealed the facility failed to ensure Resident #60 received the required two-person assistance with transfers. This affected one resident (#60) of four reviewed for accident hazards. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Observation on 10/17/22 from 1:28 P.M. to 1:37 P.M. revealed State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #39 pushing a hoyer lift into Resident #60's room and closing the door at 1:37 P.M. STNA #39 exited the room by herself. Interview on 10/17/22 at 1:37 P.M. with STNA #39 verified she transferred Resident #60 using a hoyer lift by herself. She confirmed a transfer with hoyer lift required two staff members, but she was the only aide on the unit and Resident #60 needed to be transferred and placed on the bed pan immediately. Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 09/14/21 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, schizophrenia, morbid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received oxygen at the appropriate flow rate as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #9) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings include: A review of Resident #9's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), sleep apnea, atrial fibrillation and vascular dementia. A review of Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and his cognition was moderately impaired. He was not known to display any behaviors nor was he indicated to reject care. He was independent with no set up help needed for transfers and ambulation. His active diagnoses coded included COPD. Oxygen therapy was indicated to have been provided while a resident in the facility. A review of Resident #9's active…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of the facility's drug reference information, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving Digoxin had their apical pulse checked prior to the administration of the medication. This affected one (Resident #27) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: A review of Resident #27's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included atrial fibrillation. A review of Resident #27's physician's orders revealed he had an order to receive Digoxin 250 micrograms (mcg) by mouth every morning for atrial fibrillation. The order had been in place since 02/07/22. The physician's orders did not include any parameters to hold the medication if the resident's apical pulse was less than 60 beats per minute. A review of Resident #27's medication administration record (MAR's) for October 2022 revealed the resident was receiving Digoxin 250 mcg by mouth every morning as ordered. There was no documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving psychotropic medications had an adequate indication for use, gradual dose reductions (GDR's) were attempted, and were monitored appropriately for side effects associated with their use. This affected two (Resident #4 and #54) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #54's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a history of a stroke with hemiplegia to the left non-dominant side, MoyaMoya disease (narrowing of the blood vessels that supplied the brain with blood), aphasia, restlessness and agitation and major depressive disorder. A review of Resident #54's active physician's orders revealed the resident had an order to receive Klonopin (an anti-anxiety medication) 1 milligram (mg) by mouth (po) two times a day and 2 mg po at bedtime for seizures (not in medical history). The physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-08-28 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to provide a written transfer notice when Resident #93 and Resident #103 were hospitalized . This affected two residents (#93 and #103) of two residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 102. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #93's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/11/24 with diagnoses including hydrocephalus, traumatic hemorrhage of cerebrum, encephalopathy, chronic respiratory failure, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, dysphagia, anxiety, schizophrenia, other psychoactive substance abuse, legal blindness, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #93's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed his brief interview for mental status (BIMS) was not assessed. The resident was usually understood and sometimes understood others. Review of Resident #93's progress note dated 08/02/24 at 3:01 P.M. revealed the resident was noted to be lethargic with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-08-28 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice when two residents (Residents #93 and #103) were hospitalized . The deficient practice affected two residents (Residents #93 and #103) of two reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 102. Findings Include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #103 revealed an admission date on 05/17/24 and a discharge date on 06/13/24. Medical diagnoses included displaced [NAME] fracture of left tibia, embolism and thrombosis of arteries of the lower extremities, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety disorder, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #103's clinical census revealed Resident #103 was hospitalized and discharged on 06/13/24. Review of Resident #103's scanned documents revealed there was no evidence a bed hold notice had been provided to the resident. Review of the progress notes dated 06/13/24 revealed Resident #103 was transferred to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 4%Other / private 30%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$281per resident / day
operating cost
$8,549per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$258per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365425. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next