Riverside Manor Nrsg & Rehab Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 85 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 69.5 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.00 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.77 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 22% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of therapy records, review of the facility's investigation, review of employee conference reports, and interviews with resident(s), family, and staff, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred safely following physical therapy recommendations. This resulted in Actual harm on 04/12/26 when Resident #1 was improperly transferred resulting in a fractured arm. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for accidents and injuries.Findings include:Medical record review revealed Resident #1 was originally admitted to the facility 05/06/25 and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included displaced fracture of base of neck of right femur, nondisplaced fracture of surgical neck of right humerus, anemia, orthopedic aftercare, restless legs, heart failure, kidney disease, and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, renal disease, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a self-reported incident (SRI), interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #19 was free from verbal abuse. This affected one (Resident #19) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 70.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dementia, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of the care plan dated 01/09/25 revealed Resident #19 had a behavior of yelling in the common area and in her room. Interventions included to return Resident #19 to her room after meals; if the resident is screaming, offer her favorite snacks ([NAME] Bar or potato chips); ask the resident if she would like to lie down in bed; and approach in a cheerful way. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine out of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a self-reported incident (SRI), interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #18 was not restrained in a wheelchair without adequate training, assessments, and orders. This affected one (Resident #18) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 70.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #18 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, history of transient ischemic attack, down syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and dysphagia.Review of the plan of care dated 02/20/25 revealed Resident #18 had the potential for injury related to poor decision-making skills. An intervention dated 06/06/25 for the resident to have a custom fitted wheelchair with adaptations for safety when in chair to be delivered after measured and approved by Medicaid. Review of a general progress note dated 06/02/25 at 6:00 A.M. revealed Resident #18 was on the floor in front of the chair. The resident had red drainage noted from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of self-reported incidents (SRI), interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of verbal abuse by staff towards Resident #19 were immediately reported. This affected one (Resident #19) out of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 70.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dementia, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #19 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine out of 15 which indicated cognitive impairment. Resident #19 had verbal behaviors one to three days during the seven-day assessment period. Review of SRI tracking #263082 dated 07/22/25 at 2:49 P.M. revealed Resident #19 was sitting in the dining room with other residents getting ready to eat lunch. Resident #19 began screaming. Certified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-01-30 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — widespread
  Have policies on smoking.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview with staff, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a safe and clean environment free from discarded cigarette butts in the resident smoking area. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Observation on 01/27/25 at 11:15 A.M. the resident smoking area with Housekeeper #201 revealed several cigarette butts on the concrete pad under the awning and in the stones by the building where the residents smoked. There were several leaves laying around the area which could catch on fire. Interview on 01/27/25 at 11:20 A.M. with Housekeeper #201 confirmed the cigarettes were not discarded properly in the fireproof container. Review of the undated policy titled, Smoking/Electronic Cigarettes revealed the purpose was to educate all staff and residents on the policy and procedure in regard to smoking and electronic cigarettes. The policy made no mention of proper discarding of cigarettes. Review of the undated policy Staff Smoking revealed cigarettes were to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of employee disciplinary conference report, review of staff schedules, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident concerns with personal care were addressed timely. This affected one (Resident #5) of four reviewed for abuse. Findings included: Medical record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizophrenia, dementia with psychotic disturbance, depression, coronary artery dissection, Alzheimer's, allergic rhinitis, constipation, ulcerative colitis, anxiety, insomnia, chronic kidney disease, heart disease, mood disorder, gout, gastro-esophageal reflux, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, overactive bladder, sleep apnea, Parkinsonism, anemia, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the care plan dated 03/28/24 for Resident #5 revealed the resident had an alteration in bowel function related to needing assistance with mobility with interventions that the resident was dependent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of the facility investigation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure Resident #6 was not abused by a staff member. This affected one resident (Resident #6) of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease, depression, vitamin D deficiency, anxiety disorder, cirrhosis of the liver, malignant neoplasm of the large intestine, diabetes, heart failure, osteoarthritis of the hip, atrial fibrillation, lymphedema, adrenocortical insufficiency, and insufficiency. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had intact cognition. Review of the progress note dated 09/11/24 at 8:45 P.M. revealed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #210)) was assisting Resident #6 in the shower when the resident started to get loud with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of medical records, resident interview, representative interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were provided a written summary of the baseline care plan. This affected two (Residents #61 and #165) of six residents reviewed for baseline care planning. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #61's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/26/24 with diagnoses including displaced fracture of the base of the neck of the right femur, depression, vitamin D deficiency, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus and displaced fracture of the surgical neck of the left humerus. The medical record revealed no indication that Resident #61 or her representative were provided a summary of the baseline care plan. Interview on 01/27/25 at 10:28 A.M., Resident #61's representative revealed he did not recall receiving a summary of the plan of care. Interview on 01/30/25 at 7:17 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) verified she was unable to locate evidence that a summary of the baseline care plan was provided to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were revised timely. This affected two residents (Residents #10 and #61) of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 10/24/22. Diagnoses included hemiplegia affecting the left side, actinic keratosis, bipolar disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, peptic ulcer disease diabetes, anxiety disorder, osteoarthritis, benign prostatic hyperplasia, chronic pain, insomnia, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, major depressive disorder, cerebrovascular disease, and paralytic syndrome. Review of the plan of care dated 10/27/22 revealed Resident #10 was a smoker and required a smoking apron. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had intact cognition and had one side upper extremity impairment. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, observation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #49 received assistance with oral care. This affected one (Resident #49) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #49's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/19/24 with diagnoses including diabetes, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, kidney disease, gastro-esophageal reflux, weakness, and heart disease. Review of Resident #49's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was dependent on staff for oral care. There was no evidence of refusals or rejection of care. Review of Resident #49's interdisciplinary team (IDT) progress note dated 01/17/25 revealed the resident required set up assistance for oral hygiene. Review of Resident #49's care plan indicated the resident had an alteration in dental status related to own teeth. The resident's plan of care stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents with non-pressure related skin issues were comprehensively assessed and treated in a routine manner. This affected two (Residents #51 and #165) of two residents reviewed for non-pressure related skin impairment. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #165's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/01/25. Medical diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of the right ovary, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), adult failure to thrive, diabetes mellitus type two, anemia, and fistula of the intestine. A pre-admission hospital history and physical dated 12/25/24 indicated an abdominal drain in the right lower quadrant of the abdomen had accidentally been pulled out ten days previous. A Computed Tomography (CT) scan showed a complex right cystic lower abdominal intraperitoneal mass likely ovarian origin which appeared to have a fistula tract through the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH