No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Saint Luke Lutheran Home

220 Applegrove Street NE, North Canton, OH 44720 · Non profit - Corporation · 166 certified beds · (330) 499-8341 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2026Resident-funds citation (F0567)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0744)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$97,793 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (79) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $97,793 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-12)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (82%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1339 N Main St · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1339 N Main St · (330) 966-4703 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1474 N Main St · (330) 497-0718 · Call to confirm hours
Park
241 7th St NE · (330) 499-8223 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.1%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.4%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%0.4%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms24.7%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.2%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.1%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.9%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.4%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.2%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control36.5%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.7%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.3%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.7%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.1%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.6%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.011.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.251.801.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.35U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.9%CMS range 33.2–53.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.2–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge46.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge90.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 5.1–14.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.061.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.54
RN hours/ resident / day
1.10
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.07
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.71
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
81.7%
Total nursing turnover
55.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 166 beds and averages 121.0 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.54 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 82% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-10)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-30)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

79 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 66 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-04 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation of facility recorded video footage with sound, observation of police officer body camera footage, medical record review, facility incident review, review of a self-reported incident, interview, dementia training curriculum review, facility assessment review and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #145, who was cognitively impaired and had a diagnosis of dementia, was provided adequate, necessary kind, appropriate and dignified dementia care to meet his total care needs. This resulted in immediate jeopardy and the potential for serious harm and injury on 07/06/25 at 5:46 A.M. when the resident began to wander throughout the facility secured dementia unit. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #800 and CNA #568 were observed on video to yell at the resident to get out of other resident rooms, to go back to his room, the facility was not his home and to stop hitting staff or they would call the police, and he would go to jail. The lack of planned and appropriate intervention, lack…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive and resident centered plan to prevent and/or treat the development of pressure ulcers. Actual harm occurred beginning on 06/08/25 when Resident #95, who was at high risk for pressure ulcer development and dependent on staff for activities of daily living, developed an avoidable Stage II pressure ulcer (partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis. The wound bed is viable, pink or red, moist, and may also present as an intact or ruptured serum-filled blister. Adipose [fat] is not visible, and deeper tissues are not visible. Granulation tissue, slough and eschar are not present) to the left buttock. The wound was not comprehensively assessed, wound treatments were not consistently provided and appropriate staff were not notified of the development of the pressure ulcer. The pressure ulcer subsequently declined and on 07/17/25 was assessed to be a Stage III (full-thickness loss of skin, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, and interview, the facility failed to timely identify areas of new skin impairment for Resident #39. This affected one resident (Resident #39) of one reviewed for pressure ulcers. Actual harm occurred on 01/03/23 when Resident #39, who was cognitively impaired, at high risk for pressure ulcer development, and dependent on staff for bed mobility, was found to have a deep tissue injury (persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration) with a necrotic area to the left heel. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, congestive heart failure, hypertension, pain, hypothyroidism, benign neoplasm of the meninges, and venous insufficiency and diabetes. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was admitted with two Stage II pressure ulcers; one to the left buttock which measured 0.5 centimeters (cm) in length by 0.5 cm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure annual evaluations was completed. This had the potential to affect all 121 residents. The facility census was 121. Findings include: Review of personal file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #718 revealed the facility had not completed an annual evaluation for CNA #718 since 04/21/21.Interview on 03/09/26 at 9:48 A.M. Human Resources Manager #995 verified the facility has not completed an annual evaluation on CNA #718 since 04/21/21.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility indicated three (Residents #1, #63 and #136) do not receive meals from the kitchen as they receive nothing by mouth. The facility also failed to ensure resident room and unit refrigerators were monitored and maintained in a safe manner. This affected five (Residents #25, #85, #100, #101, and #110) and had the potential to affect 25 (Residents #6, #16, #22, #25, #26, #30, #34, #37, #38, #41, #43, #58, #74, #75, #82, #85, #97, #100, #101, #102, #104, #109, #110, #118, and #123) residents the facility indicated had room refrigerators. The facility census was 121.Findings include:Initial kitchen tour was completed on 03/02/26 at 8:30 A.M. with Dietary Director #845 and Dietary Supervisor #958. Observation on 03/02/26 at 8:39 A.M. of the stand mixer revealed dried food particles on the front and top of the mixer. Dietary Supervisor #958 confirmed the mixer should have been cleaned following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-03-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an effective administration staff. This finding had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 121.Findings include:1. Observation and subsequent interviews on 01/08/26 revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #624 kicked Resident #117's bed and hit the resident with a closed fist. Further reviews revealed CNA #624's Nursing Orientation Checklist dated 12/05/25 did not have evidence of the entire second page of care including resident property sheet process, falls management program, gait belt, safe transfers, safety, sit-to-sand, mechanical lift, using your maxi move, call system basics, sensor alarms, resident alarms, shift to shift walking rounds, morning care, management of difficult behaviors, avoiding bruising and skin tears in the elderly, dementia bathing, restraints, mood and behavior patterns. The form was noted dated or signed by the employee or staff member completing the orientation.Interview on 03/09/26 at 11:02 A.M. with Human Resources (HR) #995…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) including toileting, showering and shaving for Residents #1, #4, #13, and #57. This affected five (#1, #4, #13, and #57) of 14 residents reviewed for ADL's. The facility census was 121.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 04/20/23 with diagnoses chronic respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus and repeated falls. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed he had intact cognition. He was able to understand staff and staff understood him. He had no behaviors noted on the assessment. He was dependent on staff for ADLs. Review of the shower schedule, undated, revealed Resident #1's showers were scheduled on Sunday and Thursday afternoons. Review of the shower sheets and electronic medical record from 01/01/26 through 03/01/26 for Resident #1 revealed the did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, interview and policy review the facility did not honor dietary preferences for three (Residents #8, #14, and #45) residents and did not tell or offer the family of Resident #8, who was cognitively impaired, the option to complete weekly menus. This had the potential to affect all resident receiving meals from the facility. The facility indicated three residents (Residents #1, #63 and #136) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 121. Findings Include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 09/08/23. Diagnoses included but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease, displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of left humerus with routine healing, and age-related physical debility. Review of the 08/25/25 physician order revealed and order for a regular mechanical soft diet with thin liquids with ice cream at lunch and dinner. Review of the 10/22/25 dietary note revealed the mini nutrition assessment was completed and noted no significant weight changes in the past three months. No noted evidence of dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure palatable meals for residents receiving meals from the kitchen. This affected two (#14 and #134) and had to the potential to affect all residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified three residents (#1, #63 and #136) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 121.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 02/05/26. Diagnoses included unspecified fracture of the lower end of the right radius, anxiety disorder, morbid obesity and need for assistance with personal care.Review of the physician order dated 02/05/26 for Resident #14 revealed a diet order for a regular diet with thin liquids.Review of the 02/10/26 Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #14 revealed a Brief interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 which indicated intact cognition. Resident #14 was noted to be dependent upon staff for eating and all activities of daily living (ADLs.)Interview on 03/02/26 at 12:45 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of maintenance logs and repair invoices, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment repairs were completed timely. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility indicated three (Residents #1, #63 and #136) receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 121. Findings include:1. Observation on 03/02/26 at 9:20 A.M. during the kitchen initial tour with Dietary Supervisor #958 revealed the high temperature dish washer was working but had a visible leak. Observation at the time revealed the dish machine running with water leaking out the side and was draining down the wall behind the dish machine near electrical outlets onto the floor. A large puddle of water was observed on the floor which was approximately an inch deep and staff working the dish machine appeared to have wet shoes standing in front of the dish machine. Unnamed dish machine worker stated it was a pain to stand in the water while trying to keep the dishes moving. Interview at the time of the observation with Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, family interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary environment and failed to ensure patient care equipment was maintained in good repair. This finding affected six (Residents #4, #34, #69, #87, #134 and #137) of eleven resident rooms reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility census is 121.Findings include:Observations on 03/05/26 from 11:54 A.M. to 12:19 P.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #827 of resident rooms revealed:Resident #4's bed remote had wires coming out of the remote and the facility had placed tape around the cord from about halfway up the cord to the remote itself. The cord was attached to the bed.Resident #34's curtain rod was bent and the rod with the curtains attached was hanging down at an angle above the residents bed.Resident #69's carpet had multiple stains and deep drywall scratches with missing paint.Review of Resident #87's wheelchair revealed dried brown debris was on the footrest clips on both the right and left side. The daughter who was seated in the room at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #10 had privacy during care. This affected one (#10) of two residents observed for care. The facility census was 121. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 01/30/26 with diagnoses including heart failure, diabetes mellitus and muscle weakness. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was dependent for toileting, showers and transfers. Resident #10 was occasionally incontinent of bowel. Review of the care plan dated 02/10/26 for Resident #10 revealed he had self-care deficits which required staff assistance with activities of daily living related to functional decline, impaired mobility, weakness, end stage disease and age related changes. Staff were to ensure resident was clean and well groomed daily. Observation on 03/04/26 at 9:39 A.M. of Resident #10's room revealed his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were clean, sanitary and that residents had clean linens. This affected two (#85 and #110) out of three residents observed for a homelike environment. The facility census was 121.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #85 revealed an admission date of 11/23/22 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #85 had intact cognition. He had no behaviors and was dependent on staff for hygiene and transfers. Observation and interview on 03/05/26 at 12:38 P.M. with Resident #85 revealed he was in bed. There were dirty bed linens draped over his wheelchair, dirty incontinence care wipes on the floor beside his bed, a bed pad on the corner of his tray table with creams and medications and his recliner had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 66 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-03-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, review of in-room videos, review of the facility self-reported incident, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #117 was free from physical abuse. This affected one (#117) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 121.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #117 revealed and admission date of 12/29/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies dementia, generalized anxiety disorder and Alzheimer's disease with late onset. Resident #117 was also noted to receive hospice services.Review of Resident #117's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment and required maximum assistance for toileting hygiene. Review of Resident #117's care plan last reviewed on 01/14/26 revealed Resident #117 was receiving hospice services, was noted to have self-care deficits and required staff assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-03-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy when Resident #6's allegation of abuse and staff concerns regarding the neglect of care for Resident #10 were not reported to the Administrator. Additionally the facility failed to ensure Resident #47's injury of unknown origin were reported to the State Agency. This affected three (#6, #47 and #10) of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 121. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 11/28/2025. Diagnoses included ischemic cardiomyopathy, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation, diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, and depression. Review of Resident #6's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was intact. Review of Resident #6's March 2026 physicians orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-03-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs) and policy review the facility failed to complete an investigation for Resident #47 and also failed to complete a thorough investigation for Resident #117 as required. This affected two (#47 and #117) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 121. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #117 revealed an admission date of 12/29/25. Diagnoses included but were not limited to neurocognitive disorder with Lewy Bodies, generalized anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome and Alzheimer's dementia. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 12/30/25 for Resident #117 for hospice services. Review of the 01/02/26 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #117 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMs) of four which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #117 was noted to require maximum staff assistance with toileting. Review of the facility Self-Reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring, assessments, and wound treatments were completed as ordered. This affected one (#31) of one resident reviewed for wounds. The facility census was 121. Findings include: Review of Resident #31's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and expired in the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, and peripheral vascular disease. Resident #31 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE] status post (s/p) right great toe amputation on [DATE]. Review of Resident #31's Discharge Return Anticipated MDS 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited a memory problem. Review of Resident #31's admission Assessment form (readmission) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was unable to understand and had surgical incisions of the right hip and right great toes. Review of Resident #31's history and physical dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer prevention interventions and treatments. This affected one (#10) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 121. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 01/30/26 with diagnoses including heart failure, diabetes mellitus and muscle weakness. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was dependent for toileting, showers and transfers. Resident #10 was occasionally incontinent of bowel. He had no skin impairment noted on this assessment. Review of the care plan dated 02/10/26 for Resident #10 revealed he was at risk for skin breakdown related to incontinence of bowel, having an indwelling device, impaired mobility, weakness and age-related changes. Interventions included to notify the physician of skin problems and treatments would be initiated per orders.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-03-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #117 received a thorough fall investigation and failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for Resident #8. This affected two (#117 and #8) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 121. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #117 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Lewy Bodies Dementia, chronic pain syndrome and Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #117's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #117's care plan dated 01/01/26 revealed a risk for falls characterized by history of falls/injury and multiple risk factors. Interventions included analyzing previous resident falls to determine whether pattern/trend can be addressed, call light accessible, and if a fall occurs, assess factors leading to fall and notify the doctor and family of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #10's foley catheter output was monitored as ordered. This affected one (Resident #10) of three reviewed for catheters. The facility census was 121. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 01/30/26 with diagnoses including heart failure, diabetes mellitus and muscle weakness.Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was dependent for toileting, showers and transfers. Resident #10 was occasionally incontinent of bowel and had an indwelling catheter.Review of the care plan dated 02/10/26 for Resident #10 revealed he had an indwelling catheter. Interventions included for staff to record input and output.Review of the physician's orders for Resident #10 revealed he had an order for staff to record foley output every shift (day, evening and night shift) dated 02/03/26 and discontinued 02/26/26. His physician's orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and the facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #01's percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube dressing was in place. This affected one of one residents reviewed for PEG tube care. The facility census was 121. Findings include:Review of Resident #01's medical record revealed a facility admission date of 01/31/26 with a diagnosis of pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit.Review of Resident #01's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #01 had a feeding tube.Review of Resident #01's physician orders revealed an order for PEG tube site care to cleanse around the PEG tube site with normal saline daily and apply a split dry dressing every night shift.Review of Resident #01's enteral nutrition care plan, dated 02/18/26, revealed no PEG tube dressing care listed as an intervention in the care plan.Review of Resident #01's treatment administration record revealed the PEG tube dressing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected three (#1, #4 and #47) of seven residents reviewed for medications administration. The facility census was 121.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 04/20/23 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease and depression.Review of the current physician's orders revealed Resident #1 had orders dated 01/31/26 for Albuterol Sulfate Inhalation 2.5 milligrams (mg) per 3 milliliters (mL), inhale orally three times a day for shortness of breath, Clonidine 0.1 mg every eight hours for hypertension, Gabapentin 400 mg three times a day for pain, and Hydralazine 100 mg three times a day for hypertension. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2026 for Resident #1 revealed Albuterol Sulfate was not administered on 02/05/26, 02/08/26 and 02/22/26 at 6:00 A.M. and on 02/22/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure monthly pharmacy recommendations were completed timely and further failed to ensure the physician order for pharmacy recommendations were followed. This affected two (#4 and #6) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 121. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 05/31/24 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, depression and anxiety. Review of the pharmacy recommendation dated 03/20/25 revealed the pharmacist reviewed Resident #4's medication and inquired if a gradual dose reduction of either Fluoxetine 20 milligrams (mg) (antidepressant) or Hydroxyzine 10 mg (antihistamine with sedative properties used to treat anxiety and itching) would be appropriate at that time. The physician had responded on 06/09/25, stating to discontinue the Hydroxyzine. Review of the physician orders revealed no order to discontinue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This finding affected two (Residents #85 and #141) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 121.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #141's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged back to the assisted living facility on 02/06/26. Diagnoses included cellulitis, anemia and depression. Review of Resident #141's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #141's care plan dated 01/23/26 revealed the resident was on an antibiotic and an intervention was to administer medications as ordered. Review of Resident #141's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/10/26 for meropenem (broad-spectrum intravenous (IV) antibiotic used to treat severe bacterial infections), one gram intravenously every eight hours for cellulitis to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, review of storage information, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure insulin pen injectors were disposed of when expired and the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at bedside. This affected one (#85) of one resident reviewed for medications at bedside and two (#104 and #01) of two residents receiving insulin. The facility census was 121. Findings Include:1. Review of Resident #104's medical record revealed a facility admission date of 04/19/23 with the diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #104's physician orders revealed an order for Humalog subcutaneous solution pen injector 100 units per milliliter and to give two units with meals. Observation on 03/05/2026 at 8:24 A.M. of the Ridgeview medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #897 revealed two expired Humalog pens dated 01/28/26 and 01/29/26 for Resident #104. LPN #897 verified the medication cart contained two Humalog insulin pens for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were used for Residents #01, #69, and #10. This affected three (#01, #69 and #10) of three residents reviewed for EBP. The facility census was 121. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #01's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/31/26 with diagnoses including pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit. Review of Resident #01's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/02/26, revealed Resident #01 had a feeding tube. Review of Resident #01's physician's orders revealed an order for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) due to a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube each shift. Review of Resident #01's care plan, dated 02/18/26, revealed there were no enhanced barrier precautions listed as an intervention for the PEG tube administration. Observation on 03/05/2026 at 11:50 A.M. of Resident #01's medication administration with Agency Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, review of room temperature logs, and interview, the facility failed to ensure room temperatures and temperatures in common areas were maintained within the required range and for the comfort of residents. Room temperature monitoring revealed inappropriate room temperatures in four (rooms 147, 171, 270 and 275) of 11 resident rooms and three of seven common areas affecting seven residents (Residents #29, #40, #46, #52, #68, #72 and #73) and two unidentified residents. The census was 118.Findings Include: On 01/28/26 between 9:20 A.M. and 9:52 A.M., random room temperatures were monitored by Maintenance Technician #200, using the facility ambient thermometer. The following rooms/areas were identified to be outside the regulatory temperature ranges: (temperatures were measured in Fahrenheit)a. Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus and hypertension. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications remained in their original labeled packaging and failed to ensure insulin pens and vials were appropriately labeled and not used past the expiration date. Improper medication storage was identified in two of four medication carts observed. This affected three residents (Residents#22, #86 and #113). The facility census was 118.Findings Include: 1. On 01/28/26 at 12:30 P.M., the Ridgeview medication cart was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #230. There was an unlabeled vial of open Lantus insulin. The vial was not designated as belonging to a specific resident. On 01/28/26 at 12:30 P.M., LPN #230 stated the vial of Lantus insulin had to belong to Resident #86 because he was the only resident whose medications were stored on the cart that received Lantus insulin. LPN #230 verified the vial was unlabeled with no specific residents, instructions for use, or documentation of when the vial was opened. LPN #230 stated she would have to discard the vial.2. On 01/28/26 at 12:51 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the privacy of Resident #118's medical record was maintained and failed to ensure privacy was maintained during care for Resident #54. This affected two residents (Resident #54 and #118) of five observed for privacy. Findings Include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #118 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diabetes mild cognitive impairment, hypothyroidism, hypertension, generalized anxiety disorder, dementia, personality disorder, peripheral vascular disease, and bipolar disorder.Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #118 had intact cognition.Observations on 12/31/25 from 9:30 A.M. to 9:35 A.M. revealed Resident #118's medical information was visible on the computer at the unattended medication cart in the hallway. The medical information listed was the residents' medications list, and identifier…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of shower schedules, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure personal bathing preferences were accommodated and showers were documented/completed for Resident #27. This affected one resident (#27) out of three residents reviewed for bathing.Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included volvulus, urinary tract infection osteoarthritis, peripheral neuropathy, breast cancer, skin cancer, acute embolism of right lower extremity, and osteoporosis.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #27 had intact cognition and did not refuse care. She required moderate assistance with bathing.Review of the nurse's note dated 10/06/25 at 2:57 P.M. revealed Resident #27 refused to shower this shift, stating she would not take a shower after 7:30 A.M. Review of the nurse's note dated 12/15/25 at 2:10 P.M. revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, observation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure systems were in place to provide appropriately sized incontinence products to residents, subsequently leading to Resident #79's development of moisture-associated skin damage (MASD). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure Resident #79 was comprehensively assessed after developing MASD. This affected one resident (#79) of three residents reviewed for adequate supplies. Findings Include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #79 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included displaced bimalleolar fracture of the right lower leg, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, rheumatoid arthritis, glaucoma, congestive heart failure, atrial flutter, vertigo, tachycardia, spinal stenosis, and insomnia.Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #79 had no skin issues. Review of the admission Braden Scale dated 11/26/25 revealed Resident #79 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, policy review and review of material safety data sheet (MSDS), the facility failed to ensure possible hazardous areas and materials were properly secure on the memory care unit. This had the potential to affect 25 residents (#2, #8, #10, #12, #16, #30, #38, #39, #40, #45, #54, #60, #64, #65, #71, #79, #87, #89, #92, #94, #100, #115, #118, #121, and #129) that were able to ambulate and propel in wheelchairs on the memory care unit. Facility census was 129.Findings include:An observation of the memory care unit on 11/17/25 at 12:06 P.M. revealed the door to the soiled utility room located on Somerset Hall was unlocked. The soiled utility room had barrels for soiled linens and trash. Several wheelchairs and other equipment were located in the soiled utility room. An observation of the memory care unit on 11/18/25 at 2:31 P.M. revealed the door to the clean utility room located on Greenbriar Hall was unlocked. There were two containers with 160 wipes in each of Microkill Germicidal Wipes The shelving unit would be accessible to residents standing or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure resident representatives received room change notification. This affected one resident (#121) of three residents reviewed for family notifications. The census was 129.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #121 revealed an admission date of 06/07/23. Diagnoses included but not limited to acute kidney failure, dementia, and unspecified psychosis. Resident #121 resided on the secured, locked, memory care unit.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored a 14 out of 15 on the Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) indicating intact cognition.Review of Resident #121's medical record revealed a progress note dated 10/10/25 at 11:13 A.M., late entry, the patient was moved from (current room) to (current room) and was showered and changed.There was no indication in the medical record Resident #121's representative received notification of the room change.Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #81 was administered intravenous antibiotics as ordered resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (Resident #81) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. Facility census was 129.Findings include: A review of the medical record revealed Resident #81 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included sepsis due to pseudomonas, osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot, and type 2 diabetes. Resident #81 was ordered to receive intravenous antibiotics.Review of Printable Hospital Discharge Form in the medical record revealed on 10/21/25 at 10:58 A.M. Hospital Case Manager #497 wrote the only other option if Avycaz (intravenous antibiotic to treat serious Gram-negative bacterial infections, a combination antibiotic of ceftazidime and avibactam) was too expensive, would be Fetroja (an antibiotic to treat serious bacterial infections). Hospital Case Manager #497 asked to be notified if one or the other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to timely assess and obtain necessary treatment for Resident #207 for a urinary tract infection. This affected one resident (#207) of three residents reviewed for urinary tract infection. The facility census was 127. Findings include: Review of Resident #207's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/22/25 with diagnoses including chronic atrial fibrillation, hypothyroidism and congestive heart failure. Review of the Resident #207's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment with a reference date of 08/29/25 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent upon staff for assistance with toileting and always incontinent of urine. Review of the nursing progress notes, dated 09/28/25 at 1:12 P.M. revealed Resident #207 complained of burning during urination and a new order was obtained to straight cath (inserting catheter into the bladder to obtain urine) for urine sample and the family was notified. Review of the nursing notes revealed no evidence of any documentation of family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility temperature log review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the boiler systems were functional and operational for resident/staff access to adequate hot water. This had the potential to affect all 124 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: Review of facility concern logs for [DATE] revealed there was a concern with hot water running and resolution of repairs being made. In [DATE] there was a concern of water temperatures being Lukewarm. Interview on [DATE] at 6:39 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #378 revealed there had been no hot water on the memory care unit for the past couple weeks. CNA #378 reported this had affected the staff ability to assist with showers. Observation on [DATE] from 6:52 A.M. to 7:03 A.M. on the Memory Care Unit with CNA #378 of resident rooms of the water from the hot water spigot revealed the following: Resident #27's hot water spigot was turned on and the surveyor placed a hand in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, facility temperature log review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure water temperatures were maintained at a comfortable level for resident bathing/showers, failed to maintain an adequate supply of clean bath linens for resident use and failed to ensure garbage bags were available and provided in resident rooms to contain trash. This affected 11 residents (#3, #20, #27, #30, #32, #44, #96, #100, #111, #113 and #124) reviewed for water temperatures, one resident (#40) reviewed for linen availability with the potential to affected an additional undetermined number of residents based on staff interview and four residents (#32, #40, #44, and #48) reviewed for garbage disposal. The facility census was 124. Findings include: During the onsite investigation, the following environmental concerns were identified: 1. Review of facility concern logs for June 2025 revealed there was a concern with hot water running and resolution of repairs being made. In…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were comprehensive. This affected three residents (Resident #62, #93, and #125) of 10 residents reviewed for care plans. Facility census was 124. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 08/02/25 and diagnoses included pneumonia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had impaired cognition. Review of the physician order dated August 2025 revealed Resident #62 received Eliquis (anticoagulant) 5 milligram (mg) one (1) tablet in the morning and 1 tablet in the evening (HS).Review of the care plan dated 08/02/25 revealed there was no care plan for anticoagulant therapy.Interview on 08/28/25 at 10:27 A.M. with Minimum Data Set (MDS) Registered Nurse (RN) #260 confirmed there was no anticoagulant therapy care plan for Resident #62 and there should have been. Review of facility policy, Care Plans, Comprehensive,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, care conference postcard and letter invitation review, interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure care plan meetings were offered timely, per preference, and in person. This affected one (Resident #40) of three residents reviewed for care plan meetings. The facility census was 124.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 09/16/22. Diagnoses included but not limited to encephalopathy, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, psychosis and dementia. with behavioral disturbance.Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #40 scored a zero on the brief interview mental status (BIMS) out of 15, resulting in severely impaired cognition. Resident #40 was dependent on staff for all her care needs to include toileting, showering, and eating.Interview on 09/10/25 at 9:45 A.M. with Resident #40's family member revealed she was not offered any care conferences in over five (5) months with the last care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and closed medical record review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed and the physician was contacted with elevated blood pressure findings. This affected one resident (125). The facility census was 124.Findings included: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #125 revealed an admission date of 07/16/25 and a discharge date home of 07/21/25. Diagnosis included but not limited to fracture of sacrum pubis, and wedge compression fracture of T11-T12 Vertebra, malignant neoplasm of glottis, and chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of left lower extremity.Review of the physician orders dated 07/16/25 for Resident #125 revealed an order for orthostatic blood pressure (BP) times (x) three (3) shifts every shift for lying BP, sitting BP, and standing BP.Review of the physician orders dated 07/17/25 for Resident #125 revealed an order for transfers: two person physical assist every shift.Review of the blood pressure readings for Resident #125 revealed on 07/17/25 at 1:07 A.M. lying blood pressure (BP) was 186/99 and sitting BP was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served timely on the Memory Care Unit. This affected all 33 residents residing on the Memory Care Units (Resident #19, #20, #21, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, and #51). The facility Census was 124. Findings include: Interview on 09/10/25 at 9:45 A.M. with Resident #40's family reported the food trays are always late to the dining room by almost an hour.Observation on 09/11/25 at 12:00 P.M of the dining room in Memory Care Unit revealed 17 residents were seated and awaiting their lunch meals.Interview on 09/11/25 at 12:13 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #353 confirmed meals are late.Interview on 09/11/25 at 12:13 P.M. with CNA #408 confirmed meals are late.Observation on 09/11/25 at 12:37 P.M. revealed the first meal cart arrived to the unit. Seven (7) staff (two unidentified staff and CNA #345, CNA #353, CNA #375, CNA #408, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #331)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement infection control procedures during medication administration. This affected one resident (#100) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 124.Findings include: Review of record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 08/20/22. Diagnosis included but not limited to volvulus, history of malignant neoplasm of the breast and skin, and absence of parts of the digestive tract and of both cervix and uterus.Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 had intact cognition.Review of the physician orders for August 2025 revealed Resident #100 was ordered Vitamin D3 50 microgram (mcg) give two capsules by mouth (PO) in the morning.Observation of medication administration on 08/28/25 at 8:15 A.M. revealed with Registered Nurse (RN) #316 administered Vitamin D3 50 mcg one capsule to Resident #100. RN #316 then realized the order was for Vitamin D3 50 mcg to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, policy review, and staffing schedules, the facility failed to ensure they were adequately staffed to ensure Residents ( #7, #9, #14, #17, #20, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #28, #29, #32, #33, #37, #38, #41, #44, #50, #51, #52, #59, #62, #66, #73, #74, #75, #77, #89, #92, #95, #96, #100, #110, #115, #122, #125, #126, #127, #135, #139, and #145) were adequately supervised, provided incontinence care, had medications administered as ordered, had treatments completed as ordered, and received meal trays. This affected 42 Residents( #7, #9, #14, #17, #20, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #28, #29, #32, #33, #37, #38, #41, #44, #50, #51, #52, #59, #62, #66, #73, #74, #75, #77, #89, #92, #95, #96, #100, #110, #115, #122, #125, #126, #127, #135, #139, and #145) out of 141 residents. However, this had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 141. Findings include:1. Review of the call light times for 07/05/25 revealed at 7:24 A.M. Resident #110's call light was on for two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, and test tray results, the facility failed to maintain palatable and appetizing food temperatures. This had the potential to affect all but two residents ( Resident #68 and Resident #66) who did not receive a meal tray from the kitchen. The census was 144. Findings include: 1.Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/27/23. Medical diagnosis included nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, pneumonia, depression, anxiety, bipolar and dementia. Review of Minimum Data Set ( MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed cognition was moderately impaired. No rejection of care was noted. Resident #39 needed supervision to eat. Review of Nutrition assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was on a regular diet consistency, regular liquid consistency with a no added salt restriction. Interview on 07/02/25 at 1:02 P.M. with Resident #39 who stated the chicken was too hard to chew and cut, ,therefore, she did not eat the chicken and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, review of facility billing/financial information, review of the facility assessment, review of the Administrator's job description, and interviews the facility failed to ensure effective and efficient administration to meet the total care needs of all residents in the facility. The facility census was 141. Findings include: Review of survey history revealed the facility was cited neglect for financial solvency and this had not been resolved or corrected as of the 08/04/25 survey resulting in a recite for neglect and substandard quality of care.On 07/08/25 at 10:10 A.M. an interview with Human Resources #509 revealed the Administrator started his position August 26, 2024. 2. On 06/27/25 at 11:04 A.M. an interview with FMD #727 revealed the facility terminated his position on 04/30/25 as the medical director and had not paid for his services for the past thirteen months.Review of document titled Medical Director Invoice Number 03022025, billed to the facility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-04 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Record review, facility policy review, facility assessment, and interviews , the facility failed to ensure an effective governing body, legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding the management and operation of the facility, including but not limited to compliance with all financial obligations for the delivery of care. This had the potential to affect all 141 residents in the facility. Findings include:Review of the facility survey history revealed on 05/12/25 a complaint survey was completed which resulted in concerns related to financial solvency under neglect at substandard quality of care However, at the time of the complaint survey completed 08/04/25, the facility failed to ensure their governing body was effective in establishing and implementing policies in regard to the management and operation of the facility, which included ongoing compliance with all financial obligations for the delivery of care as detailed below.1. On 06/27/25 at 11:04 A.M. an interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and homelike environment. This affected three residents (Resident #11, #53 and #65) but had the potential to affect all 141 residents. Findings include:1.Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Medical diagnosis included fracture of femur, cerebral infarction, major depression , hypertension and hemiplegia.Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 annual assessment revealed Resident #11's cognition was not intact and did not reject care. Observation on 06/26/25 at 7:57 A.M. of Resident #11's room revealed old spoons, cracker wrappers, old mild and cereal from 06/25/25. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #500 verified the findings and stated she was unsure if housekeeping cleaned Resident 11's room. 2.Observation on 06/30/25 from 9:30 A.M. to 11:19 A.M. with Maintenance worker #607 revealed the shower room on the Twin Hills unit had a black ring inside the toilet bowel above the water…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secure on the memory care unit. This had the potential to affect all 35 residents on the memory care unit. The facility census was 141. Findings include:An observation on 07/09/25 at 9:54 A.M. revealed nine residents were in the dining room on the memory care unit. A medication cart was sitting against the wall in the dining room. The medication cart lock was not pushed in to lock the cart. A large bottle of acetaminophen (for fever or pain) 500 milligrams was sitting on the top of the medication cart. The lid was off the acetaminophen and lying on the cart. There were approximately 15 to 20 tablets in the open bottle of acetaminophen. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was assisting residents out of the dining room. On 07/09/25 at 9:55 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #639 came quickly down the hallway and stated she had just stepped away for a moment. LPN #639 verified the medication cart was unlocked and there was an open bottle of acetaminophen sitting on top of the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-04 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #37 was provided with a diet texture as ordered. This had the potential to affect eight residents ( Resident #34, #81, #95, #97, #98, #101, #134, and #135) who received puree diets. The facility census was 141. Findings include: Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Medical diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease, osteoarthritis, hypertension, major depressive disorder, type two diabetes, dementia and encephalopathy. Review of physician orders dated 02/23/24 revealed Resident #37 was ordered a puree diet with thin liquid consistency. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #37 had short and long term memory problems. Resident #37 needed moderate assistance to eat and had no loss of liquids from mouth or was holding food in mouth or choking during meals during the review period. Resident #37 was on a mechanically altered and therapeutic diet. Review of Nutritoin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, facility email, medical record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #26 was treated with dignity and respect. This affected one (Resident #26) out of three residents reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 141. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage four, dehydration, hyponatremia, polyarthritis, depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus, moderate calorie malnutrition, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Preferences for Routines and Activities dated 02/12/25 revealed it was very important to Resident #26 to choose her own bedtime. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact. Resident #26 required partial to moderate assistance for transfer from chair to bed. Review of an email from Director of Nursing (DON) to Ombudsman dated 07/16/25 at 6:00 P.M. revealed Certified Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had access to funds in a reasonable amount of time. This affected four residents ( Resident #139, #38, #22, and #85) of four residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility managed 40 resident fund accounts. The facility census was 141. Findings include : 1. 1. Resident #139 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Medical diagnosis included type two diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypothyroidism, hypertension, anxiety, osteoporosis, dementia, major depressive disorder, personality disorder, bipolar disorder.Review of Minimum Data Set ( MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed cognition was intact and did not exhibit hallucinations or delusions. Resident #139 was her own financial responsible party and Primary Payer source was Care Source Medicaid.Interview on 07/14/25 at 10:16 A.M. with Resident #139 revealed she could not receive fifty dollars from petty cash on 07/13/25. Resident #139 stated she needed her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to honor Resident #145's power-of-attorney (POA) request for Depakote (mood stabilizer) to be held. This affected one (Resident #145) out of three residents reviewed for choices. The facility census was 141.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #145 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ataxia, dementia, psoriatic arthropathy, recurrent depressive disorder, wandering, and adult failure to thrive. A progress note dated 07/02/25 at 9:20 A.M. revealed Resident #145's POA visited and had multiple questions. Resident #145's POA re-iterated she did not want Resident #145 on any medications containing a black box warning. The POA's conversation and concerns were reported in a binder for the provider to address. A psychiatric evaluation note dated 07/10/25 revealed Resident #145 was a [AGE] year-old male presented for initial psychiatric evaluation. The assessment note revealed Resident #145 was to continue Zoloft…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify Resident #145's family and physician in a timely manner of changes in behavior and medications. This affected one (Resident #145) out of three reviewed for notifications. Facility census was 141.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #145 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ataxia, dementia, psoriatic arthropathy, recurrent depressive disorder, wandering, and adult failure to thrive.A care plan dated 06/25/25 revealed Resident #145 had inappropriate behavior and was resistive to care. Interventions included allowing flexibility in activities of daily living routine to accommodate mood, elicit family input for best approaches to resident, and if Resident #145 refused care, and leave Resident #145 and return in 5-10 minutes. a. A progress note dated 06/29/25 at 2:39 A.M. revealed Resident #145 had a skin tear to the left elbow that measured one centimeter (cm) long and three cm wide. An additional progress…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, facility investigation, self-reported incident (SRI), and policy review, the facility failed to complete a thorough and adequate investigation in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #145) out of two reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 141.Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #145 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ataxia, dementia, psoriatic arthropathy, recurrent depressive disorder, wandering, and adult failure to thrive.A care plan dated 06/25/25 revealed Resident #145 had inappropriate behavior and was resistive to care. Interventions to allow flexibility in the activities of daily living routine to accommodate mood, elicit family input for best approaches to Resident #145, and leave and return in five to ten minutes if Resident #145 refuses care. Review of video footage of the hall and common area outside Resident #145's room revealed on 07/06/25 at 5:46 A.M. Resident #145 walked out into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an assessment was completed before Resident #145 was placed on the secure/memory care unit. This affected one (Resident #145) out of three reviewed for placement on the secure unit. The facility census was 141. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #145 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ataxia, dementia, psoriatic arthropathy, recurrent depressive disorder, wandering, and adult failure to thrive.A care plan dated 06/25/25 revealed Resident #145 wanted to go home and was an elopement risk related to behaviors of pacing the halls and wandering into resident rooms. Interventions included to check function of secure tech bracelet weekly, reinforce reasons for placement, and encourage family involvement/support.Review of the medical record revealed no evidence of an assessment being completed to ensure Resident #145 was appropriate for placement on a secure unit.An interview on 07/14/25 at 8:46 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #145 had an individualized care plan in place to address behaviors. This affected one (Resident #145) out of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 141.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #145 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included ataxia, dementia, psoriatic arthropathy, recurrent depressive disorder, wandering, and adult failure to thrive.A care plan dated 06/25/25 revealed Resident #145 had inappropriate behavior and was resistive to care. Interventions included to allow flexibility in activities of daily living routine to accommodate mood, elicit family input for best approaches to resident, and if resident refuses care, leave and return in five to ten minutes. The Kardex report printed 07/14/24 for the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) revealed no indication of Resident #145 having behaviors or interventions for behaviors. The CNA report sheet (no date) revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide residents who were dependent with bathing, two showers a week. This affected one (Resident #77) out of three reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 141.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #77 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, recurrent depressive disorders, and chronic kidney disease.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed Resident #77 was dependent on staff for bathing. Review of the bathing documentation revealed Resident #77 received a shower on 07/03/25, 07/10/25, and 07/17/25. Resident #77 received a bed bath on 07/24/25. An interview on 07/28/25 at 1:55 P.M. Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #77 did not receive a shower twice a week as scheduled. An interview on 07/28/25 at 2:41 P.M. Resident #77 verified she only received one shower a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespread
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on obervation, review of video and photographic images, review of the facility assessment, review of the facility admission agreement, review of utility bills, review of vendor/supplier invoices, interview with staff, residents, facility vendors and medical supply companies and utility company representatives, the facility failed to effectively manage financial obligations required to secure the necessary resources required to ensure the ongoing appropriate delivery of care to meet the needs of the residents resulting in potential situations of resident neglect. This had the potential to affect all 132 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 05/01/25 at 2:11 P.M. confidential information provided to the State agency revealed concerns related to the facility not paying their bills for trash removal, thereby causing garbage to be piled up in the facility's basement and a maintenance truck full of expired foods that were unable to be removed from the property due to the lack of trash removal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were comprehensive for Residents #102 and #122. This affected two residents (#102 and #122) of six residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility census was 132. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #122 revealed an admission date of 09/01/23. Diagnoses included heart disease, kidney disease, hearing loss, anxiety and Alzheimer's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #122 was severely cognitively impaired. She required set up help for eating and oral hygiene, supervision for toileting, substantial assistance for showering and dressing and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. She displayed physical behavioral symptoms such as hitting, kicking, pushing and scratching, verbal behaviors such as threatening and screaming at others and often rejected care. Review of the care plan dated 02/09/25 revealed no evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, interviews, review of the shower schedule, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide assistance with bathing services as scheduled to Residents #67 and #102. This affected two residents (#67 and #102) of three residents who were reviewed for assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 132. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 06/11/19. Diagnoses included encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, dysphagia, anorexia, urinary incontinence, adult failure to thrive, gastrostomy status, atrial fibrillation, unspecified dementia, difficulty walking, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 02/03/25 revealed Resident #67 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for all ADL, including bathing. Review of the care plan dated 01/24/19 through 07/29/25 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This affected 33 residents (#2, #5, #6, #15, #20, #28, #34, #37, #38, #39, #41, #47, #51, #52, #53, #56, #68, #73, #74, #78, #79, #80, #86, #92, #95, #98, #116, #118, #119, #120, #122, #124 and #125) on the memory care unit and had the potential to affect all 132 residents in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 05/05/25 at 9:26 A.M. of the memory care unit revealed two ceiling tiles in the common area living room removed and a red bucket on the floor underneath. Interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #309 at the time of the observation confirmed the ceiling tiles had been removed when she came into work, and she believed the bucket was to catch any liquids that may have been dripping. Observations on 05/05/25 at 12:45 P.M. of the laundry area revealed a brown substance on two of the ceiling tiles covering approximately 40 percent of each tile. Three other tiles were bulging from the frame. A pipe was coming from a ceiling tile…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to transfer residents appropriately using a mechanical lift resulting in a fall. This affected one (Resident #19) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 145. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/28/25 with admission diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident with ataxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension and history of falls. Upon admission a fall risk assessment indicated the resident was at risk for falls and required extensive assist with mobility. An admission fall risk care plan identified the resident as a high risk for falls characterized by history of falls/injury. Review of the physician's orders revealed on 03/01/25 the resident was to be transferred by two persons and utilize and hoyer (mechanical) lift. Review of the progress notes revealed on 03/04/25 the resident sustained a fall without injury when transferring in the bathroom with staff when not using a hoyer lift. Review of the facility fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the medical record, and interviews the facility failed to ensure fingernails were cleaned and trimmed for dependent Residents #13, #54, and #63 and failed to ensure showers were completed as scheduled for dependent Residents #41 and #45. This affected five residents ( Resident #13, #41, #45, #54, and #63) of seven reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, restless leg syndrome, osteoarthritis, atrial fibrillation, and contractures. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the progress notes from 19/25/22 to 01/24/23 revealed no documentation Resident #13 refused to have her fingernails trimmed. Observations on 01/23/23 at 8:13 A.M., 10:33 A.M., and 1:35 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident representatives were notified of a resident with significant weight loss. This affected one (Resident #70) of three residents reviewed for weight loss. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/26/20 with admission diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease with dementia and chronic kidney disease. Further review of the medical record including monthly weights revealed on 07/06/22 Resident #70's weight was recorded as 123.8 pounds. Weight on 08/05/22 indicated Resident #70 was 109.6 pounds, a weight loss of 14.2 pounds or 11.5 percent weight loss. Further review of the monthly weights revealed on 01/04/23 a weight of 107.8 pounds, which indicated a 16 pound weight loss or 12.9 percent over six months. Review of nutritional progress notes revealed a 30 day significant weight loss was identified and documented on 08/08/22 which indicated Resident #70 had lost significant weight from the month previous. Additional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall risk assessments were completed for two (Resident #29 and Resident #34) of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 10/11/22. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, cardiac pacemaker, hypertension, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and altered mental status. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #29, dated 10/31/22, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The assessment indicated the resident required extensive, one-person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, walking in the room, and toileting. The resident's mobility devices were a walker and a wheelchair. Review of the plan of care for Resident #29 revealed the resident had a potential for falls due to balance problems. Interventions included to assess for factors leading to a fall. Review of Incident/Event Summary Investigation, dated 11/14/22, revealed on 11/14/22 at 5:25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure antibiotic assessments were completed prior to initiation of antibiotic medication to determine appropriate use and indication of antibiotic medication. This affected one (Resident #56) of six residents reviewed for antibiotic medication use. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of Resident #56's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/28/18 with admission diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, peripheral vascular disease, chronic non-pressure ulcer to the left ankle. Further review of the medical record including physician's medication orders revealed on 03/24/22 Bactrim DS (antibiotic) was prescribed for infection to the left ankle wound, 03/10/22 Keflex (antibiotic) was prescribed for infection to the left ankle wound and 01/27/22 doxycycline (antibiotic) was prescribed for infection to the left ankle wound. Further review of the medical recording including antibiotic use assessments found no evidence an assessment was completed prior to initiation of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-30 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, resident interviews and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident #44 and Resident #51 received COVID-19 vaccine education. This affected two residents (Resident #44 and #51) of five reviewed for COVID-19 vaccinations. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, depressive disorders, hyperlipidemia, vitamin D deficiency, atherosclerotic heart disease, delirium, malaise, alcohol dependence, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence COVID-19 vaccination education was given to Resident #51 or a declination form signed refusing the vaccine. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 had intact cognition. On 01/25/23 at 10:15 A.M. Resident #51 indicated she was never given COVID-19 vaccine education or asked to sign a declination form. On 01/25/23 at 4:10 P.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-02-06 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete annual State Tested Nurse Assistant (STNA) performance evaluations as required. This affected three STNA's (STNA #247, STNA #259, and STNA #263) of three STNA's reviewed for annual performance evaluations and had the potential to affect all residents receiving care in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the personnel file revealed STNA #247's date of hire was 10/10/13. Her last annual performance evaluation was completed on 07/03/18. There was no evidence an annual performance evaluation had been completed prior to the start of the facility's annual inspection on 02/03/20. An interview on 02/06/20 at 9:50 A.M. with Human Resource Manager #320 confirmed the above performance evaluation was not completed annually as required. 2. Review of the personnel file revealed STNA #259's date of hire was 10/01/18. There was no evidence an annual performance evaluation had been completed prior to the start of the facility's annual inspection on 02/03/20. An interview on 02/06/20 at 9:50 A.M. with Human…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to properly store medications in the Greenbrier medication cart (serving Residents #8, #10, #18, #33, #36, #39, #44, #55, #67, #100, #101, #110, #112, #113, #144, #390, and #391) cart and the Ridgeview medication cart (serving Residents #7, #15, #20, #43, #48, #49, #53, #58, #60, #61, #62, #71, #72, #74, #76, #90, #93, #120, #122, and #439) and the facility failed to properly dispose of medications on the dementia unit. These concerns had the potential to affect all 37 residents receiving medications from the two medication carts and had the potential to affect 10 residents (#11, #18, 44, #45, #67, #84, #109, #111, #241, #391) who were mobile in the dementia unit dining room out of 37 residents on the dementia unit. The census was 136. Findings include: 1. An observation and interview on 02/04/20 at 4:45 P.M. of the Greenbrier medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #139 revealed half of an unidentifiable round orange pill and a whole light brown pill with Z on it, identified as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure servings were appropriate, food was palatable, and food was served at appropriate holding temperatures. This had the potential to affect 37 residents (Resident #4, #13, #15, #20, #21, #25,#28, #29, #40, #49, #53, #56, #58, #60, #64, #73, #74, #82, #86, #87, #88, #89, #91, #93, #98, #99, #118, #121, #123, #125, #126, #127, #130, #132, #136, #339, and #439) of 84 residents who reside on the second floor and eat meals served from the kitchenettes and affected Resident #15, #20, #28, #60, #93 and #118 and had the potential to affect the other 42 residents (Residents #5, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #18, #24, #30, #33, #35, #38, #41, #44, #49, #51, #53, #57, #63, #67, #79, #81, #84, #85, #91, #98, #99, #102, #104, #108, #112, #113, #114, #120, #123, #127, #129, #135, #136, #391, and #439) who received a regular texture diet of chicken breast. The facility's census was 136. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/05/20 at 7:48 A.M. until 8:28 A.M. revealed Dietary Aid #265 plating food for the residents in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Advanced Directives, directions for desired care in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest, were clear and accurate for Resident #32. This affected one of one resident reviewed for Advanced Directives. The facilities census was 136. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE], with diagnoses that included dysphasia (difficulty swallowing), end stage renal (kidney) disease, and high blood pressure. Review of Resident #32's physician's orders revealed an order dated [DATE] for a code status of, Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care (DNR-CC). DNRCC means a person will receive any care that eases pain and suffering, but no resuscitative measures to save or sustain life will be provided. Review of the medical chart revealed a signed Advanced Directive indicating Resident #32 had a Do Not Resuscitate -Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA). A DNR-CCA indicates a person wishes to have all medical care to sustain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents using a Broda chair were assessed to determine if the chair was being used as a possible restraint prior to implementation. This affected one (Resident #59) of one residents reviewed for restraint use. Findings include: Review of Resident #59's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/03/13 with an admission diagnosis that included Alzheimer's disease with dementia. Observations of Resident #59 on 02/02/20 at 10:28 A.M. revealed the use of a Broda chair (specialized wheelchair with reclining a seatback and cushioned side panels). Additional observation on 02/05/20 at 9:21 A.M. and 02/05/20 at 8:38 A.M. revealed Resident #59 in a reclined position in the Broda chair. Review of the monthly physician's orders indicated the use of a Broda chair for comfort and positioning on 11/30/2017. Further review of the medical record found no evidence of a restraint assessment for the use of a reclining Broda chair to determine if the chair restricted Resident #59's freedom of movement.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to accurately screen Resident #46 via the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) to determine necessary care and services. This affected one resident of one resident reviewed for PASARR. The facility's census was 136. Findings include: Review of Resident #46's medical chart revealed an admission date of 05/25/18 with diagnosis that included anxiety disorder, unspecified psychosis not due to substance or known physiological condition, and vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of Resident #46's PASSAR revealed that it was completed on 06/08/18, and did not indicate that the resident had vascular dementia or psychosis. Interview on 02/04/20 at 10:57 A.M. with Social Worker #31 confirmed the initial PASSAR was not completed correctly therefore the determination stating that the resident did not need services may not be accurate.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #32 had her geri- sleeves applied per physician order. This affected one resident out of one reviewed for adaptive equipment. The facility census was 136. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/18/13 with diagnoses that included, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, end stage renal disease, and muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of Resident #32's physician's orders revealed a 12/03/19 physician's order for geriatric or geri-sleeves (protective sleeves) to the resident's arms. The geri-sleeves were to be applied in the morning and removed at night. Review of Resident #32's current care plan revealed she was at risk for skin breakdown and would scratch open areas causes scabbing. The care plan indicates an intervention for geri-sleeves to be applied to both arms in the morning and to be removed at night. Interview on 02/03/20 at 2:28 P.M. with Resident #32 revealed staff sometimes but on her geri-sleeves but not always. She did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to conduct a safe Hoyer (mechanical) lift transfer for Resident #48. This affected one of five residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 136. Findings include: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] and the diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS), quadriplegia (paralysis of the torso, the arms and legs), anxiety, urinary incontinence, and muscle wasting atrophy. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, scores of 13 to 15 indicate the person is alert, oriented and cognitively intact. This assessment indicated he was totally dependence on two staff for bed mobility and transfers. Review of the monthly summary, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #48 required total assistance and devices for transfers. A care plan dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 required assistance from staff related to impaired mobility and MS with interventions to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #137 had orders in place for staff to provide routine care and cleaning for his indwelling urinary catheter. This affected one of one resident reviewed for urinary catheters. Findings include: Review of Resident #137's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/21/19 with diagnoses that included urinary retention and nodular prostate. Review of the physician's orders revealed the use of a suprapubic catheter (indwelling catheter inserted through the lower abdomen wall and into the bladder) on 12/06/19. Further review of the physician's orders found no evidence of orders in place for routine cleaning and care of the suprapubic catheter to maintain cleanliness and prevent contamination/infection. Review of the current Treatment Administration Record (TAR) also found no evidence of staff providing routine cleaning or care for Resident #137's suprapubic catheter. Review of an Advanced Practice Nurse note dated 01/17/20 advised staff to clean Resident #137's catheter and insertion site every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two residents were free from unnecessary medications. This affected two (Resident #24 and Resident #82) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 136. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #24's medical record revealed an admitting date of 01/08/19 and the diagnoses of Parkinson's disease, anxiety, pain, depression, Alzheimer's disease, and depression without behavioral disturbances. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 04 indicating severely impaired cognition and she required the extensive two staff assistance for transfers and bed mobility, and she had no hallucinations or behaviors. Review of her current physician orders revealed she was receiving Risperdal, an antipsychotic medication, 0.25 milligrams (mg) twice daily for agitation. A care plan dated 01/22/19 revealed the resident had potential for side effects of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow proper infection control measures during incontinence care for Resident #37 and with a dressing care for Resident #95. This affected two (Resident #37 and Resident #95) out of two residents during random infection control observations. The census was 136. Findings include: 1. A medical record review revealed Resident #95 had an admission date of 02/21/11 and the diagnoses of cellulitis to right lower limb and left lower limb. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition, and he required limited assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, transfers and personal hygiene. It further revealed the resident had venous ulcers. Review of the resident's current physician orders reveled orders to apply Santyl, an ointment for wounds to removed dead/dying tissue, to the right foot twice daily and as needed and to clean the right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-05-12 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted timely. This had the potential to affect all 132 residents in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 05/05/25 at 10:23 A.M. revealed the daily posted staffing information was posted for 05/04/25. Interview at the time of the observation with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the daily staffing information posted was for 05/04/25 and had not yet been updated for the current day. This deficiency is an incidental finding identified during the complaint investigation.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$97,793 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $97,793 — penalty dated 2025-05-12
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-12 for 44 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ST. LUKE LUTHERAN COMMUNITYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/27/2002
LANGER-CHAMPLIN, KATHLEENIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/22/2019
MOHLER, JOYCEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 07/02/2018
DIEHL, DIANEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2002
HESSEL, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/23/2013
MCNULTY, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/28/2015
SPIELER, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2007

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-38.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 48%Medicare 4%Other / private 48%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$308per resident / day
operating cost
$9,367per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$223per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365521. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next