No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Northridge Rehabilitation and Care Center

35990 Westminster Ave, North Ridgeville, OH 44039 · For profit - Individual · 96 certified beds · (440) 327-8511 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (440) 327-8511 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (66%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
34960 Center Ridge Rd
Pharmacy
35000 Center Ridge Rd · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.6 mi
35111 Center Ridge Rd · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
7327 Avon Belden Rd · (440) 353-0860 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
35777 Center Ridge Rd · (440) 327-2201

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.0%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.9%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms21.6%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.9%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.1%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.7%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.8%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.5%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine43.1%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission2.8%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.0%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.911.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.021.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
not reportedno hours filed
Therapy hours / resident / day

Met the expected recovery: 71.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.9%CMS range 45.8–75.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.8–16.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.7%CMS range 4.8–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.82
RN hours/ resident / day
0.77
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.51
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.81
RN hoursweekends
65.6%
Total nursing turnover
69.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 81.7 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.93 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.81 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

20
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-06)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-02-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices after providing resident care. This had the potential to affect all 69 residents residing at the facility. The facility census was 69.Findings include:Record review for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 12/09/21. Diagnoses included muscle weakness, unspecified dementia, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non dominant side. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was dependent for toileting hygiene and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Record review of the care plan for Resident #38 dated 12/09/23 revealed Resident #38 experienced bowel and bladder incontinence. Interventions included to check and change Resident #38 every two hours and as needed. Staff were to provide peri-care with incontinent episodes. Observation on 09/03/25 at 1:37 P.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, review of a police report, review of facility investigation documents, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's change in condition was reported to the physician in a timely manner. This affected two (#23 and #20) of four residents reviewed for assessments and monitoring. The census was 69. Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 02/04/25 and a discharge date of 05/01/25. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, cocaine use, and alcohol abuse. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 was cognitively intact. Resident #70 had no impairment to the upper or lower extremities, was independent with eating, used a wheelchair for mobility and was independent for wheelchair mobility. Review of a progress note dated 01/30/25 from Resident #70 ' s emergency room physician, prior to admission to the facility, revealed Resident #70 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, incident file review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive resident centered care plans were developed to address resident medical and psychosocial needs. This affected one (#70) of four residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 69.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included alcohol abuse, cocaine use, type II diabetes, and morbid obesity.Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance to complete activities of daily living. Resident #70 discharged to the community on 05/01/25.Review of a progress note dated 01/30/25 from Resident #70's emergency room physician, prior to admission to the facility, revealed Resident #70 was a [AGE] year-old male with a past medical history of polysubstance use. The note further indicated Resident #70 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received timely care and services from staff to provide activities of daily living (ADLs). This affected one (#38) of three residents reviewed for ADLs care. The facility census was 69.Findings include:Record review for Resident #38 revealed an admission date of 12/09/21. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction due to embolism of the right middle cerebral artery, muscle weakness, congestive heart failure, cardiac pacemaker, contracture of the right and left knee, unspecified moderate dementia with agitation, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was cognitively intact. Resident #38 had impairment on one side of the upper extremity and both sides of the lower extremities. Resident #38 required set up or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of a police report, and review of facility investigation documents, the facility failed to ensure a resident (#70) was properly monitored for behaviors regarding drug use following know usage in the facility and failed to timely assess a resident (#23) following exposure to illicit substances. This affected two (#23 and #70) of four residents reviewed for assessments and monitoring. The census was 69.Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 02/04/25 and a discharge date of 05/01/25. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, cocaine use, and alcohol abuse. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 was cognitively intact. Resident #70 had no impairment to the upper or lower extremities, was independent with eating, used a wheelchair for mobility and was independent for wheelchair mobility. Review of a progress note dated 01/30/25 from Resident #70's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to assure residents received supplemental oxygen per physicians orders. This affected one (#72) of three residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility census was 69.Findings include:Record review for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 08/30/25. Diagnoses included anoxic brain damage, pneumonia due to methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), asthma, emphysema, and acute and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #72 was rarely or never understood and cognitive skills were severely impaired. Resident #72 was dependent for eating, toileting hygiene, and bed mobility. Resident #72 received oxygen therapy continuous. Review of the care plan for Resident #72 dated 09/01/25 revealed the resident had potential for complications related to diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per the physicians orders. This affected two (#17 and #30) of 14 residents identified by the facility with orders for insulin injections via insulin pen. The facility census was 69. Findings include:1. Record review for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 11/06/23. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed 08/16/25 revealed Resident #17 was cognitively intact. Resident #17 had impairment on one side to the upper extremity, received insulin injections, and had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Review of the care plan for Resident #17 dated 11/07/23 revealed Resident #17 had potential risk for hyper/hypoglycemia due to a diagnosis of diabetes. Interventions included to administer medications as ordered. Review of the physician orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident, family, and staff interview, record review, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to provide sufficient staffing to consistently meet the resident's needs. This affected three (Residents #55, #181, and #182) and had the potential to affect all 74 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: 1) There was inadequate staff to complete timely incontinence care and bathing/showering for the residents. 1a. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #181 was cognitively intact. Resident #181 required partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene. Resident #181 was occasionally incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. Interview on 01/29/25 at 3:25 P.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #309 stated at times the facility did not have enough staff to complete resident's care timely including incontinence care and not being assisted to bed timely. CNA #309 stated yesterday (01/28/25), while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of personnel job descriptions, review of personnel files, review of the facility's infection control program, resident, staff, and family interview, and interview with the local health department (LHD), the administration team lacked involvement to ensure staff and resident reports of staff mistreatment were not dismissed before investigating the allegations, did not identify an issue with the resident's medical records being accurate and factual, and did not ensure adequate staffing was maintained to meet the needs of their residents and according the facility's assessment. Administration did not ensure routine care conferences were being held routinely with the residents and resident representatives and did not ensure routine written notices of transfer and bed hold notices were completed upon the resident's transfer to the hospital. Additionally, the administration team demonstrated inaction and failed to perform their job responsibilities to ensure infection control policies…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of a COVID-19 outbreak log, review of staffing schedules, review of staff timecards, review of the staff call-off log, staff and resident interview, observation, interview with the Local Health Department (LHD), review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) infection control guidance, and policy review, the facility failed to implement an effective and recommended infection control practices, including timely contact tracing to identify close contacts of COVID-19 positive residents and staff, timely reporting of a COVID-19 outbreak to the LHD, and a system to ensure all staff and residents were tested for COVID-19 per CDC guidelines and facility policy to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19 to vulnerable residents within the facility. This affected 26 residents who resided throughout the facility (#2, #4, #7, #9, #11, #20, #21, #26, #27, #32, #34, #37, #42, #45, #50, #52, #55, #57, #59, #67, #68, #79, #80, #81, #82, and #177) and three staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of resident immunizations, review of personnel records, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and staff were educated on the risks, benefits, and side effects of the COVID-19 vaccine. This affected five (#14, #42, #53, #57, and #64) of five residents reviewed for immunization and seven of seven employees reviewed for immunization and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 74. Findings include 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 01/11/24. Diagnoses included anoxic brain injury, and sudden cardiac arrest. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment Review of Resident #57's undated consent form for the pneumococcal vaccine revealed a hand written note stating the resident would like the COVID-19 vaccine. There was no information sheet for the COVID-19 vaccine and no documentation the resident/representative had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to have routine/scheduled care plan meetings for the residents and/or resident representative in 2024. This affected one (Resident #51) of one resident reviewed for care plan meetings. The facility identified all residents residing at the facility with the exception of 18 residents admitted after November 2024 (Residents #17, #18, #23, #24, #29, #34, #45, #51, #53, #59, #61, #66, #65, #135, #179, #181, #182, and #183) did not have care conferences in 2024. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Record review for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 12/13/22. Diagnoses included displaced midcervical fracture of the left femur, atrial fibrillation, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #51 had impairment on both sides of the lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident, family, and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate and factual. This affected eight (Residents #26, #35, #38, #53, #53, #55, #57, and #177) of 27 residents medical records reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1 Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date 12/09/21. Diagnoses included left hand contracture. Review of the physician orders for February 2025 revealed palm protective splint to left hand on in the PM and off in the AM, activated 01/20/23. Review of the plan of care revealed assistance needed for activities of daily living (ADL) related to decreased range of motion to left hand. Interventions included palm protective splint to left hand on in the PM and off in the AM. Review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for February 2025 revealed treatment for palm protector splint to left hand was marked that it was put on 02/04/25 and signed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect. This affected two (Resident #13 and #74) of four residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included psychosis, depression, anxiety, delusional disorders, altered mental status, heart failure, chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was cognitively intact. Interview on [DATE] at 1:22 P.M. with Resident #13 stated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #346 was always saying things that were sarcastic and rude. Resident #13 also reported being pretty sure LPN #346 cursed at her on an unknown date. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #74 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. The resident expired in the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all residents' call lights were within reach. This affected three (Residents #14, #34, and #42) of 74 residents reviewed for call lights within reach. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 07/28/20. Review of the plan of care dated 04/19/21 revealed Resident #42 was at a potential risk for falls related to dementia, bipolar and decreased safety awareness. Interventions included to ensure call light was within reach. Observation on 01/28/25 at 11:10 A.M. revealed Resident #42's call light laying on floor at the bottom of bed. Resident #42 was unable to reach the call light. Interview on 01/28/25 at 11:15 A.M. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #334 verified Resident #42's call light was at the bottom of bed and out of reach. CNA #334 stated staff were to ensure call lights were within reach and residents were able to use the call light. 2) Review of the medical record for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's family was notified of a resident's decline in condition. This affected one (#178) of four residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #178 revealed an admission date of [DATE], a readmission date of [DATE] and a discharge date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included pneumonia, hypertension, and acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #178 had impaired cognition. Review of a physician order dated [DATE] revealed Resident #178's code status was Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC). Review of nurse's note dated [DATE] at 11:16 A.M. revealed the nurse went to assess and provide resident medication and resident was noted with respiratory distress. The resident's pulse oximetry level was 80 percent on four liters via…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was completed for Resident #61 to include depression, anxiety, and the use of psychotropic medications. This affected one (Resident #61) of 27 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 11/04/24. Diagnoses included delirium, dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance and mood disturbance, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #61's care plan initiated on 11/13/24 revealed the resident's anxiety, depression, behaviors, and use of antipsychotic and psychotropic medications were not addressed in the comprehensive care plan. Review of the physician orders revealed the following psychotropic medications: on 11/04/24, an order for quetiapine 50 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for anxiety. On 11/09/24, an order for Zoloft 25 mg in the morning for dementia and anxiety and Depakote sprinkles 125 mg at bedtime for delirium, dementia and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure a resident who required assistance from staff with activities of daily living received the care and services with bathing/showers. This affected one (Resident #182) of three residents reviewed for bathing/showers. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Record review for Resident #182 revealed an admission date of 11/21/24 and a discharge date of 12/30/24. Diagnoses included presence of right artificial hip joint and encounter for orthopedic aftercare. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #182 was cognitively intact. Resident #182 had impairment on one side of the lower extremity. Resident #182 was dependent on staff for showering/bathing. Review of the care plan dated 11/21/24 revealed Resident #182 had no care plan for activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the physician orders for Resident #182 dated 11/24/24 revealed skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, family and staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered compression socks were implemented for Resident #55 and failed to timely provide care and treatment to treat a resident's excessive sweating causing skin issues. This affected two (Residents #54 and #55) of seven residents reviewed for care and services. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 05/15/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, dementia, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #55 had impairment on both sides of the upper and lower extremities. Resident #55 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Review of the care plan for Resident #55 dated 05/15/23 and revised 07/17/24 revealed an intervention was to apply TED (thrombo-embolic deterrent; type of compression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the appropriate treatment and services to maintain/improve mobility according to physician orders. This affected one (Resident #26) of one resident reviewed for range of motion. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission date 12/09/21. Diagnoses included left hand contracture. Review of the physician orders for February 2025 revealed palm protective splint to left hand on in the PM and off in the AM, activated on 01/20/23. Review of the plan of care revealed Resident #26 required assistance with needed for activities of daily living (ADL) related to decreased range of motion to left hand. Interventions included palm protective splint to left hand on in the PM and off in the AM. Observation and interview on 01/28/25 at 2:51 P.M. revealed Resident #26 was propelling self in her wheelchair down the hall and her left hand was contracted and no splint was on. Interview with Resident #26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable fall with minor injury for Resident #54, failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for Resident #54 who was at a fall risk, and did not complete a thorough fall investigation into Resident #173' fall. This affected two (Residents #54 and #173) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1) Record review for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 05/30/23. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non dominant side, aphasia, muscle weakness, tracheostomy, cerebral infarction, and acute respiratory failure. Review of the care plan created 06/05/23 revealed Resident #54 was totally dependent on staff for ADLs and does not participate in any aspect of the task for bed mobility. Interventions included to use two persons assistance for repositioning, hygiene and bathing. The care plan was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident, family, and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's indwelling catheter tubing was secured to the resident to prevent dislodgement of the urinary catheter. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents receive timely incontinence care. This affected two (Resident #5 and #47) of three residents reviewed for indwelling catheters and two (Residents #55 and #181) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility identified seven residents who have an indwelling catheters. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1) Record review for Resident #181 revealed an admission date of 01/15/25. Diagnoses included atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the care plan dated 01/16/25 revealed Resident #181 experienced bowel and/or bladder incontinence. Interventions included to provide incontinence care every two hours and as needed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents on psychotropic medications were monitored for adverse consequences and behaviors were routinely monitored. This affected three (Residents #13, #42, and #61) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified 48 residents receiving psychotropic medications. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 11/04/24. Diagnoses included delirium, hypertension, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance and mood disturbance, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and major depressive disorder. Review of the care plan initiated 11/13/24 revealed no plan of care was in place for anxiety, depression, behaviors, use of antipsychotic and psychotropic medications. Review of the physician orders revealed the following psychotropic medications for Resident #61: on 11/04/24, an orders for quetiapine 50 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for anxiety. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, review of Medscape guidance, and policy review, the facility failed to prime an insulin pen per manufacturer instructions prior to administration, resulting in a significant medication error. This affected one (Resident #30) of five residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility identified 14 residents who receive insulin via a pen-injector. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 11/06/23. Diagnosis included type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia. Review of the plan of care dated 11/07/23 revealed Resident #30 was at risk for hyper/hypoglycemia related to diabetes mellitus. Intervention included to administer medications as ordered. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #30 was ordered Lantus Solostar 50 units subcutaneously via a pen-injector, two times a day and Novolog 10 units via a pen-injector before meals. Observation on 01/29/25 at 6:46 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #353 administered 20…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications were stored appropriately and residents were watched when taking medications. This affected two of sevens (Resident #24 and #181) for medication storage. The facility census was 74. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #181 revealed an admission date 02/01/25. Diagnosis included pain management. Review of the physician orders for February 2025 revealed an order for Tylenol 325 milligrams (mg) give 650 mg by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. Observation and interview on 02/03/25 at 4:35 P.M. of Resident #181 revealed there was a pill cup sitting on the bedside table with two round tablets in it. Resident #181 stated she did not know what was in the pill cup, the nurse just set them down and left the room. There were no staff in the room or insight of Resident #181. Interview on 02/03/25 at 4:40 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #358 stated she though Resident #181…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff and resident interviews the facility failed to ensure narcotic pain medication was available for administration. This affected one (#32) of the three residents reviewed for receiving narcotic pain relief. The facility identified 28 residents receiving narcotic pain medications. The facility census was 80. Finding Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 08/09/22. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, lymphedema, obesity, cerebral infarction, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic ulcer of the left lower leg, chronic pain, and cellulitis. Review of the physician order dated 04/15/24 for Resident #27 revealed an order to administer oxycodone five milligram (mg) every four hours as needed (PRN) and an order to administer cyclobenzaprine 10 mg PRN for spasms. Review of Resident #27's Controlled Drug Record/Disposition Form, dated 05/13/24 for oxycodone five mg, revealed the last pill was administered on 06/14/24 at 7:00 A.M. The record revealed the resident was taking the medication consistently in the evenings.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a narcotic pain medication was accurately documented in the resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR). This affected one (#27) of three residents reviewed for pain medications. The facility census was 80. Finding Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 08/09/22. Diagnoses included acute kidney failure, lymphedema, obesity, cerebral infarction, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic ulcer of the left lower leg, chronic pain, and cellulitis. Review of the physician order dated 04/15/24 for Resident #27 revealed an order to administer oxycodone 5 milligram (mg) every four hours as needed (PRN). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/29/24, revealed the resident had intact cognition and required substantial assistance for transfers, bed mobility and was dependent on staff for toileting and showering. Review of Resident #27's Controlled Drug Record/Disposition Form, dated 5/13/24 revealed the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were in reach of residents. This affected two (#32 and #69) of the three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 80. Finding Include: 1)Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 01/18/24. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure, paraplegia, traumatic brain injury (TBI), epilepsy, and type II diabetes. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/25/24, revealed Resident #32 had intact cognition and was dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers and hygiene. Review of Resident #32's Care Plan dated 05/09/24 revealed the resident required assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) related to immobility. Intervention included to keep the call light in reach. 2)Review of the medical record for Resident #69 revealed an admission date of 08/09/22. Diagnoses included hemiplegia, cerebral infarction,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview and review of policy the facility failed to ensure residents were invited to participate in care conference meetings regarding their care. This affected two of two residents (#20, #56) reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 87. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 had an admission date of 12/05/21. Diagnoses included depressive disorder, delusional disorder, anxiety disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic kidney disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the resident's Care Conference Summary dated 09/22/23 revealed the resident's last care plan meeting was held on this date. There were no care conference meeting notes since 09/22/23. Interview on 02/26/24 at 8:52 A.M., Resident #20 would like a care plan meeting and had not been invited to one recently. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure skin assessments were completed accurately and the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygen administration. This affected one of one resident (#45) reviewed for skin assessments and oxygen administration. The facility census was 87. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #45 medical records identified Resident #45 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia ,legal blindness, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. Review of the most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial to maximal assistance from staff to aide in completing his activities of daily living. A. Review of Resident #45 current physician orders identified skin checks were to be completed weekly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to administer tube feeding formula according to directions for use. This affected one of two residents (#78) reviewed for enteral tube feedings. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 05/30/23. Diagnoses included but were not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, history of pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, dysphagia, aphasia, tracheotomy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stage three chronic kidney disease, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. Review of 1/18/24 significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #78 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03 which indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of activities of daily living (ADLs) revealed Resident #78 was dependent for all ADLs, was noted to have a history of pocketing food, coughing with meals, used oxygen, and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medications were kept secured against unauthorized access. This affected one of one resident (#50) reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 87. Findings Include: Record review revealed Resident #50 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of arteriosclerotic heart disease, heart failure, benign prostatic hyperpiesia with lower urinary tract symptoms, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking. Review of the most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 was cognitively intact and required moderate assistance from staff to aide in completing his activities of daily living. Review of the Medication Administration Policy (dated 08/22/22) stated under number 15: observe resident consumption of medication. Observation on 02/26/24 at 11:05 A.M. revealed a small plastic medication cup containing six (6) pills sitting on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-07-22 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical records review, facility policy review and staff interview, revealed the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was current and up to date. This affected two (#28 and #54) of two residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 01/29/21. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, insomnia, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and schizophrenia unspecified. Review of Resident #28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #28 was cognitively intact. Resident #28 was independent with bed mobility, transfers, eating and toileting. She required extensive assistance with one person assist with dressing, supervision with set up assistance for personal hygiene and was total dependent for bating. Review of the PASARR dated 01/29/21 revealed a check mark denoted the resident had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record, staff and resident interviews and review of facility policy revealed the facility failed to provide showers per resident preferences. This affected two (#53 of #67) three of residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living. The facility census was 75. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 09/25/15 and re-admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting unspecified side, localization-related symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndrome with simple partial seizures, major depressive disorder, insomnia, and unspecified sequelae of unspecified cerebrovascular disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/10/21, revealed Resident #53 had intact cognition. The resident required limited assistance with one person for bed mobility, transfers, and personal hygiene. He required extensive assistance with one person for dressing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an anchoring device for the Foley catheter was implemented to prevent accidental pain or injury from excessive tension and/or removal of a Foley catheter. This affected one (#41) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. The facility identified 11 residents with catheters. The facility census was 75. Findings Include: Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, tracheostomy, hypertension, and urinary retention. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed extensive assist of two person for bed mobility and has an indwelling Foley catheter. Review of the most recent plan of care revealed a potential for complications related to the use of a Foley catheter and assist with Foley catheter care as needed. Observation on 07/21/21 at 8:52 A.M., of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-02-06 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a written notice of transfer/discharge when sent to the hospital. This affected four (#44, #46, #76, and #78) of four residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. The facility identified 32 residents who were discharged to the hospital since 05/2024. The facility census was 74. Findings include 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 07/20/24. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 had intact cognition. Review of the medical record dated 07/17/24 through 10/09/24 revealed Resident #78 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE], 07/29/24, and 10/09/24. There was no documentation Resident #78 had been provided with a written notice of transfer/discharge when sent to the hospital Interview on 02/03/25 at beginning at 11:08 A.M. with Regional Administrator (RA) #408 verified the facility had not provided a written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2025-02-06 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a notice of bed hold policy when the resident was sent to the hospital. This affected four (#44, #46, #76, and #78) of four residents reviewed for transfer/discharge. The facility identified 32 residents who were discharged to the hospital since 05/2024. The facility census was 74. Findings include 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 07/20/24. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 had intact cognition. Review of the medical record dated 07/17/24 through 10/09/24 revealed Resident #78 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE], 07/29/24, and 10/09/24. There was no documentation Resident #78 had been provided with a copy of the bed hold notice. Interview on 02/03/25 at beginning at 11:08 A.M. with Regional Administrator (RA) #408 verified the facility had not provided a copy of the bed hold policy to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 3%Other / private 31%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$296per resident / day
operating cost
$8,987per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$312per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365645. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next