No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ottawa Co Riverview Nursing Ho

8180 W State Rt 163, Oak Harbor, OH 43449 · Government - County · 115 certified beds · (419) 898-2851 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609) — most recent Feb 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation$17,345 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • the CMS record shows $17,345 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-10)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
11697 W State Route 163 · (419) 898-0993 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid1.9 mi
306 W Water St · (419) 898-3911 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
279 W Water St · (419) 898-4891 · Call to confirm hours
Park
210 Finke Rd · (419) 898-2055 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
769 N Locust St · (419) 898-6700

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased11.6%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%6.2%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.4%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.5%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained1.8%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.4%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.3%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.2%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.6%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.5%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.5%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.6%24.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.4%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.951.731.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.051.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

63.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.49U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 81 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF63.0%CMS range 52.1–71.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.9–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge49.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.3–10.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.941.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.63
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.26
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
38.9%
Total nursing turnover
21.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 115 beds and averages 85.2 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.03 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.36 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-26)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-18)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-10 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, coroner interview, coroner's office investigator interview, review of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Guide to Bed Safety Bed Rails in Hospitals, Nursing Homes and Home Healthcare, review of Zenith 9000 Bed Service Manual, review of the Panacea Air Ease Owner's Manual review of policy on Bed Safety and Bed Rails, review of the facility investigation timeline, and review of the county coroner's preliminary findings, the facility failed to thoroughly assess the residents for the risk of entrapment when utilizing bed rails, when the facility assessment did not include compressing the alternating pressure relieving mattress (APM) to measure the potential gap between the mattress and the side rail, the medical needs that will be addressed with the use of bed rails, the risk from the use of bed rails and how these will be mitigated, alternatives that were attempted but failed to meet the residents ' needs, and alternatives that were considered but not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated in a dignified manner. This affected three (#31, #25, #67) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 86.Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 12/01/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, muscle weakness, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on staff for eating meals. Review of a physician order dated 02/10/24 revealed the resident was ordered a regular diet with mechanical soft texture and thin liquids. Observation on 02/24/26 at 8:45 A.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #363 was standing over Resident #31 while feeding the resident bites of food. Further observation revealed an empty chair was near where the resident was sitting at the dining table. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed about treatment options and alternatives before beginning treatment with psychoactive medications. This affected one (#9) of five residents reviewed for psychoactive medications. The facility census was 86.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 10/15/25 with diagnoses of depression, restlessness, anxiety, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Resident #9 was admitted to hospice on 02/21/26. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/22/26, revealed Resident #9 had intact cognition and received an antianxiety medication, and an antidepressant. Review of the physician order initiated 11/15/25 and discontinued 02/23/26 revealed Resident #9 received buspirone (an antianxiety medication) hydrochloride oral tablet 10 milligrams (mg), one tablet twice daily for anxiety. Review of the physician order initiated 12/03/25 and discontinued 02/23/26 revealed Resident #9 received mirtazapine (an antidepressant) tablet 15 mg,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the electronic and paper medical records, review of care conference meeting progress notes, review of a signed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order, review of physician orders, review of the plan of care, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status was consistent throughout the medical record. This affected one (#8) of 29 residents reviewed for code status in the initial sample pool. The facility census was 86. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 had an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinsonism, dementia, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, depression, and anxiety.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #8's plan of care revised [DATE], revealed the resident had chosen a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), (no Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)) code status order. Review of the resident's care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper use and monitoring of a physical restraint. This affected one (#10) of one resident reviewed for restraints. The facility identified one resident with a restraint. The facility census was 86. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 05/03/24. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, progressive multiple sclerosis, dementia, type two diabetes mellitus, and dysphagia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and was never understood. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident required physical restraints used daily as a limb restraint in bed, in chair, and out of bed. The resident was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of the plan of care initiated 05/10/24 revealed the resident had a restraint and used arm protection such as socks, gloves, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of care conference meeting documentation, resident and family interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents and resident representatives were invited to care conference meetings. This affected two (#8, #25) of two residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 86. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #8 had an admission date of 09/04/25. Diagnoses included Parkinsonism, dementia, type two diabetes mellitus, hypertension, depression, and anxiety. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the quarterly care conference meeting notes dated 11/26/25 and 02/19/26 revealed the resident was not present at the meetings. There was no documentation the resident had been given an invitation to the meeting and no documentation the resident had refused to attend the meeting. Interview on 02/23/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to follow the bowel protocol. This affected one resident (#95) reviewed for bowel movements. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #95 revealed an admission for date 02/12/26. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's, carotid stenosis, anxiety, heart disease, history of recent fall with nondisplaced fracture of the clavicle, and Meniere's disease. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #95 revealed he was cognitively impaired. Review of the current physicians orders for 02/26 for Resident #95 revealed he was prescribed Tramadol 50 milligrams (mg) for pain, Miralax 17 grams (g) daily (used for constipation prevention), Colace 100 mg twice daily (used for constipation prevention), Milk of Magnesia (MOM) 30 milliliters (ml) as needed daily (used for constipation prevention), and Bisacodyl rectal suppository 10 mg every 24 hours as needed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, policy review, and review of the facility's hemodialysis center contract, the facility failed to ensure consistent communication occurred between the facility and the dialysis center for residents who received hemodialysis (HD). This affected one (#12) of one resident in the facility who received hemodialysis. The facility census was 86.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 11/21/23 with diagnoses of end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/29/26, revealed Resident #12 had impaired cognition and received dialysis. Review of the care plan, initiated 12/18/23, revealed Resident #12 needed hemodialysis related to renal failure. No interventions were in place regarding coordination of care with the hemodialysis clinic. Review of the physician order dated 12/01/24 revealed Resident #12 went to hemodialysis offsite three times weekly on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. Interview on 02/25/26 at 10:34 A.M. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses applied lidocaine patches for pain. This affected one (#57) of one resident reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 86.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 12/01/25 with diagnoses of pain in left knee, pain in right knee, osteoarthritis, and anxiety, Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/07/25, revealed Resident #57 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for chair to bed transfers. Review of the current physician order, dated 01/27/26, Resident #57 revealed Resident #57 received Lidocaine External Patch 4% applied to bilateral knees topically one time a day for osteoarthritis. Interview and observation on 02/23/26 at approximately 11:30 A.M. revealed Resident #57 dressed and in her wheelchair. Resident #57 stated she had pain in both of her knees and complained about the pain patches on her knee rolling up under her pants. Resident #57 proceeded to pull…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of medication administration records, review of physician orders, review of pharmacy guidelines, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from a significant medication error. This affected one (#67) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 86. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #67 revealed an admission date of 11/06/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, dysphagia, hypokalemia, cardiomegaly, hypertension, hemiparesis and hemiplegia following cerebral infarction.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had mild cognitive impairment.Review of a physician order dated 10/23/25 revealed Resident #67 had orders for potassium chloride extended release 20 milliequivalents (MEQ), two tablets by mouth daily for hypokalemia. There were no physician orders to crush the resident's medications. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, family interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to arrange routine dental care visits for one (#25) of two residents reviewed for dental care. The facility census was 86.Findings include:Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/06/24. Diagnoses included dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, and coronary artery disease. Review of Resident #25's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was a [AGE] year old male with a low cognitive function. The resident was dependent on staff for oral hygiene care. Review of Resident #25's care plan revealed he was at risk for altered oral/dental status related to cognitive loss and required assistance with dental care. Interventions were to have dental exams as warranted or desired by the resident. Review of Resident #25's outside services form revealed on 06/25/25 his family gave consent for the resident to see dental services for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRI's), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff reported an allegation of resident to resident sexual abuse to the administrator or designee in a timely manner. This affected two Residents (#10 and #11) of three reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/03/21. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of two indicating Resident #10 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #10 required limited assistance with bed mobility and transfer. Resident #10 required partial/moderate assistance with lower body dressing. Resident #10 had hallucinations, and delusions during the review period. Resident #10 displayed wandering…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received timely assistance with activities of daily living. This affected two (#10 and #36) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 50. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed and admission date of 09/11/20. Diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, acute kidney failure, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, hyperlipidemia, dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/16/23, revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #36 required extensive one person assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the care plan, revised 05/09/23, revealed Resident #36 required assistance with personal hygiene. Observation on 05/15/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's advance directives were accurate in the medical record. This affected one (Resident #40) of two residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/12/19. Diagnoses included unspecified fracture of left pubis, unspecified sprain of left shoulder joint, sprain of unspecified site of left knee, bradycardia, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, end state renal disease, acute kidney failure, dependence on renal dialysis and cirrhosis of liver. Review of the paper medical record revealed a document that indicated Resident #40 wished to have a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC) code status (only comfort measures be administered before, during, or after the time of person's heart or breathing stops), indicating the DNRCC protocol would be activated immediately. This document was signed on 09/16/19. Review of online medical record revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$17,345 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-06-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
COUNTY OF OTTAWAOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/1980
COPPELER, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/03/2017
DOUGLAS, DONALDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2019
STAHL, MARKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2016
CONCEPT REHAB, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2001

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-51.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 39%Medicare 10%Other / private 51%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$510per resident / day
operating cost
$15,494per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$337per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365498. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next