Wayside Farm INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 89.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.04 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.42 to 0.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · L2023-09-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — widespread
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), local police report review, review of the facility's Abuse policy and procedure and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #28 was free from resident-to-resident physical abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual harm beginning on 08/28/23 at 4:30 P.M., when Resident #37, who was cognitively intact and known to be verbally and physically aggressive, was observed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #123 entering Resident #28's room, where he squeezed Resident #28's hands in a forceful manner. Resident #28, who was non-verbal, was heard screaming in pain, LPN #123 responded and removed Resident #37 from Resident #28's room. Resident #28 was assessed to have bilateral hand edema, bruising and pain. X-rays of Resident #28's hands revealed Resident #28 had a left (hand) fifth proximal phalanx (finger) fracture and fractures to the right hand second through fifth proximal phalanges (fingers). The resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a fall incident report and related facility investigation, review of hospital documentation, interviews with staff and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely and necessary medical intervention to Resident #41 following a fall with injury and severe pain. Actual harm occurred on 01/24/24 when Resident #41, who had moderate cognitive impairment, muscle weakness, and was known by the facility to be a safety risk for falls with injury, fell to the floor while ambulating in a common area, and was picked up off the floor by Speech Therapist (ST) #899 and walked back to his room prior to completion of a thorough nursing assessment by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #898. Upon assessment by LPN #898 on 01/24/24, Resident #41 was noted to have severe pain (seven out of 10 with 10 being the worst pain), a bruise to his left front thigh yet his physician was not notified. The resident began experiencing increased leg pain with facial grimacing with left leg…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional orders were monitored and completed. This affected one (Resident #29) of three residents reviewed for nutritional status. The census was 88. Findings Include: Resident #29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were schizoaffective disorder, dementia, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, tachycardia, osteoarthritis, seborrheic dermatitis, muscle weakness, dysphagia, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of his minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/26/25, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #29's physician orders, starting date of 06/11/25, revealed the facility was to complete weekly weight checks. There was no end date listed. Review of Resident #29's weight documentation, dated 06/11/25 to 09/12/25, revealed the following weights were not taken on a weekly basis: 07/08/25 and 07/21/25. Also, there were no weights taken between 08/06/25 and 09/04/25. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #36's risk of elopement was properly and timely re-assessed, and failed to ensure comprehensive care planned interventions were updated and implemented to prevent Resident #36 from eloping from the facility. This affected one resident (#36) of three residents reviewed for wandering and elopement. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/25/24 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, type two diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, paranoid personality disorder and anxiety. Review of Resident #36's care plan dated 04/26/24 included Resident #36 was at risk of elopement due to new admission, history of wandering and elopement, exit seeking and disease process. Resident #36's risk of leaving the facility unattended would be decreased through the next review on 11/08/24. Interventions included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-19 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents personal funds accounts with balances greater than 100 dollars were deposited into an interest-bearing account as required. This affected four (Residents #33, #47, #55, and #69) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 91. Findings Include: 1. Review of the statement for Resident #33 revealed month ending account balance of $154.15 for the month of May 2024, $141.15 for the month of June 2024 and $289.99 for the month of July 2024. No interest was noted credited to Resident #33's account during these three months. 2. Review of the statement for Resident #47 revealed month ending account balance of $1,285.30 for the month of May 2024, $1,327.30 for the month of June 2024 and $1,373.30 for the month of July 2024. No interest was noted credited to Resident #47's account during these three months. 3. Review of the statement for Resident #55 revealed month ending account balance of $11,990.95 for the month of May 2024, $10,802.20 for the month of June 2024 and $10,400.59 for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure stock medications used for residents were not expired. This had the potential to affect 15 residents (Resident #57, #2, #65, #9, #79, #84, #74, #30, #45, #61, #342, #76, #49, #43, and #10) the facility identified as receiving stock medications out of 91 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 08/06/24 at 11:54 A.M. with Unit Manager (UM) Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #836 of the west hall medication stock room revealed a partially used bottle of ducosate sodium 250 milligrams (mg) with an expiration date of 06/2024. An additional bottle of ducosate sodium 250 mg with an open date of 05/05/23 expired on 06/2024. A bottle of aspirin 81 mg expired 07/2024. A bottle of cranberry tabs 450 mg expired 05/2024. A bottle of vitamin D 25 micrograms expired 02/2024. The expired medications were verified by UM LPN #836. Observation on 08/06/24 at 12:10 P.M. with UM LPN #836 of the north hall medication stock room revealed a bottle of magnesium oxide 400 mg expired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to serve pureed foods at a smooth consistency for safe swallowing. This had the potential to affect nine residents (#10, #16, #18, #23, #27, #39, #45, #50, #62) the facility identified as receiving pureed diets of 91 residents who consumed meals from the facility's kitchen. No residents were identified as nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 91. Findings include: Observation of puree preparation on 08/06/24 from 3:45 P.M. through 4:00 P.M. revealed [NAME] #881 pureed pepper steak. [NAME] #881 portioned a sample of the puree pepper steak into a souffle cup. A taste test of pureed pepper steak revealed there were intact pieces of the beef that was not smooth in consistency. A taste test on 08/06/24 at 4:00 P.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #885 verified that the puree pepper steak was not a smooth consistency. DM #885 told [NAME] #881 to puree the pepper steak more. As [NAME] #881 was pureeing the pepper steak, the robot coupe (mechanical chopper) was making a noise. DM #885 stated that the bearings were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0569 — isolated
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident funds were conveyed timely upon resident discharge from the facility. This affected one (Resident #242) of five residents reviewed for resident funds. The facility census was 91. Findings Include: Resident #242 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. Review of the business records for Resident #242 revealed a check for $2,169.85 was dispersed to the Treasurer of Ohio State on [DATE]. Interview on [DATE] at 8:34 A.M. with Business Office Manager (BOM) #837 verified that Resident #242's funds were dispersed on [DATE] and Resident #242 expired on [DATE]. BOM #837 stated that he thought he had up to 90 days after the resident's death. BOM #837 stated that according to the Revised Ohio Code that the 90 days was because of an open application for release filed. BOM #837 could not provide documentation of any open application, and it was explained that the federal regulations are more stringent, and funds must be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0576 — isolated
  Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a facility phone they could use timely and in a private area. This affected two residents (Resident #31 and #21) out of 20 residents reviewed for right to forms of communication with privacy. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 05/01/24. Diagnosis included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Admissions Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #31 dated 05/08/24 revealed Resident #31 was cognitively intact. Resident #31 had clear speech, was able to make self-understood and was able to understand others. Interview on 08/08/24 at 9:11 A.M. with Social Worker Designee (SWD) #803 and SWD Assistant #841 revealed if a resident wanted to make a phone call, and they did not have a personal cell phone, they would have to be put on a phone call waiting list to make a call which would be done at the nurses station. The residents that get on the list wait until…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a fall incident report and related facility investigation, interviews with staff and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely notify Resident #41's primary care physician of a fall. This affected one (Resident #41) of two residents reviewed for accidents/hazards. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 08/04/16 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, sarcoidosis, epilepsy, legal blindness, cachexia, muscle weakness, unspecified abnormalities of gait and balance and alcohol induced persisting dementia. A physician order dated 11/21/23 revealed Resident #41's primary physician was Medical Director #874. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #41 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, no functional limitation in range of motion (ROM) of the lower extremities (hip, leg, ankle, foot), he used a walker and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours after admission as required. This affected one (Resident #342) of 20 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #342 revealed an admission date of 07/09/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, unspecified dementia, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory failure, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder. No evidence was found of a baseline care plan following admission. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #342 had severe cognitive impairment, required maximum assistance of one for dressing and was dependent upon staff for toileting and transfers. Interview on 08/07/24 at 4:17 P.M. with the Director of Nursing confirmed she was unable to provide evidence of a baseline care plan or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #82 received routine showers/bathing to meet his care needs. This affected one (Resident #82) of three residents reviewed for showers/bathing. The facility census was 91. Findings include: Record review for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 07/27/21. Diagnoses included encephalopathy and adult failure to thrive. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #82 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #82 required substantial/maximum assistance for toileting, personal hygiene and dependent for showers. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #82 had a self care performance deficit related to impaired cognition, needs assistance with dressing and grooming. Interventions included to encourage resident to participate in activities of daily living. Review of the shower record for Resident #82 for June and July 2024 revealed Resident #82…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$165,448 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $81,218 — penalty dated 2024-08-19
• $84,230 — penalty dated 2023-09-22
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-03 for 41 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $477K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH