Kingston Health Center of Perrysburg

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 552 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 227 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.88 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 100% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 57.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.07 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.98 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.26 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-07-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents who were identified to receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 57. Findings Include:Observation on 07/13/26 at 7:40 A.M. of refrigerator in the first-floor kitchen revealed a container of [NAME] salad dressing with an expiration date of 04/26/26 and a container of Italian salad dressing with an expiration of 06/28/26. Interview on 07/13/26 at 7:40 A.M. with [NAME] #247 verified the container of [NAME] salad dressing had an expiration date of 04/26/26. [NAME] #247 also verified the container of Italian salad dressing had an expiration date of 06/28/26. Both containers were removed from the refrigerator by [NAME] #247 and discarded. Observation on 07/13/26 at 8:00 A.M. of patient refrigerator and freezer in the patient dining area on the third floor revealed an unmarked Styrofoam cup in the freezer with a frozen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-07-16 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of daily therapy schedules. This affected four (#85, #53, #98, and #108) of 54 resident identified by the facility to be receiving therapy services in a facility census of 57. Findings include: 1. Resident #85 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including, left leg above knee amputation, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, malignant neoplasm of colon, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, anemia, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] Resident #85 was assessed with intact cognition, dependent on staff for activities of daily living, at risk for pressure ulcer development with a surgical wound. Observation on 07/14/26 at 9:08 A.M. noted Resident #85 up in the bathroom in room seated at the sink completing self activities of daily living. Resident #85 stated he was unaware when Occupational Therapy (OT) or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care to address the administration and monitoring of an anticoagulant medication. This affected one resident (#20) out of 21 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility census was 57. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included fracture of left ischium, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, chronic pulmonary embolism, congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #20 dated 06/12/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #20 had no behaviors documented. Functional abilities included dependent on others for sit to stand, chair to bed transfer, toilet transfers and car transfers. Review of orders entered for Resident #20 revealed an order for Apixaban (anticoagulant) 5 milligrams (mg) to be taken orally twice a day. Special…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #112's call light was timely answered. This affected one resident (#112) reviewed for call light response time. The facility census was 57. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #112 revealed an admission date of 07/13/26, with diagnoses including: right achilles tendinitis, syncope and collapse, type two Diabetes Mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, morbid obesity, generalized anxiety disorder, orthostatic hypotension, hypothyroidism, neuralgia and neuritis, other cervical disc degeneration, history of falling, allergic rhinitis, body mass index 39.0 - 39.9, elevation of levels of liver transaminase, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, depression, and insomnia. Review of Resident #112's most recent Medicare 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/15/26, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating Resident #112 was cognitively intact. Further review of this MDS assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to change the dressing of a Vascular Access Device (VAD) according to physicians' orders and the facility policy. This affected one resident (#38) out of one reviewed for intravenous medications. The facility census was 57. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included orthopedic surgery and infection/inflammatory reaction due to right hip prosthesis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #38 dated 07/11/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. No behaviors documented. Functional abilities included partial assistance with showering and substantial assistance with lower body dressing. Review of the admission care plan for Resident #38 dated 07/14/26 revealed resident requires intravenous (IV) medications related to a joint infection…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure interventions to promote range of motion were implemented as prescribed by the physician. This affected one resident (#56) of three residents reviewed for range of motion services. The facility census was 57. Findings include:Resident #56 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including, cerebral infarction, aphasia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right dominant side, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, anxiety disorder, and polyneuropathy. According to the most current minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] Resident #56 was assessed with severe cognitive impairment, had no resistive behaviors, range of motion impairment to one side on both upper and lower extremities, was dependent on staff for the provision of activities of daily living, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, had no history of falls, was at risk for pressure ulcer development with no skin impairment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure care-planned fall interventions were in place for Resident #108. This affected one resident (#108) of two residents (#56 and #108) reviewed for falls. The facility identified 10 residents (#2, #14, #50, #65, #69, #88, #106, #107, #108, and #111) as high-risk for falls. The facility census was 57. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #108 revealed an admission date of 07/09/26, with diagnoses including: unspecified fracture of first lumbar vertebra, unspecified nondisplaced fracture of fifth cervical fracture, unspecified nondisplaced fracture of sixth cervical vertebra, other specified fracture of left pubis, unspecified asthma, displaced fracture of body of scapula, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, depression, stage 3B chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery, polyneuropathy, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dysphagia, constipation, other symbolic dysfunctions, duodenal ulcer,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely address Resident #48's significant weight loss. This affected one resident (#48) of one resident reviewed for significant weight loss. This had the potential to affect five residents (#1, #42, #48, #56, and #68) identified by the facility has having significant weight loss. Additionally, the failed to ensure Resident #42's request for a protein snack after hemodialysis (HD) was honored. This affected one of one resident (#42) reviewed for post HD nutrition. The facility identified one resident (#42) who was on HD. The facility census was 57. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 05/22/26 with diagnoses including: displaced communal fracture of right femur, dysphagia, other symbolic dysfunctions, generalized muscle weakness, multiple fractures of ribs, cervical spinal stenosis, hypertensive chronic kidney disease,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, review of manufacturer's instructions for use, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a significant medication error did not occur for Resident #65. This affected one resident (#65) of four residents (#33, #65, #97, and #109) reviewed for medication administration. The facility identified two residents (#65 and #111) prescribed Carbidopa-Levodopa (the primary medication used to treat Parkinson's disease and related symptoms such as tremors, stiffness, and slow movement). The facility census was 57. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 06/29/26 with diagnoses including right femur fracture, generalized muscle weakness, oropharyngeal dysphagia, other symbolic dysfunctions, presence of right artificial hip joint, solitary pulmonary nodule, cyst of pancreas, wedge compression fracture of first lumbar vertebra, vitamin D deficiency, dementia, diastolic heart function, cervical spondylosis, fracture of one rib on the right side, other specified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy. The facility failed to ensure medications were appropriately and safely stored. This affected one resident (#108) of one resident reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 57. Findings Include:Review of the medical record for Resident #65 revealed an admission date of 06/29/26 with diagnoses including right femur fracture, generalized muscle weakness, oropharyngeal dysphagia, other symbolic dysfunctions, presence of right artificial hip joint, solitary pulmonary nodule, cyst of pancreas, wedge compression fracture of first lumbar vertebra, vitamin D deficiency, dementia, diastolic heart function, cervical spondylosis, fracture of one rib on right side, other specified disorders of bone density and structure, depression, acute posthemorrhagic anemia, urinary tract infection, bradycardia, Parkinson's disease, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, Type Two Diabetes Mellitus, presence of aortocoronary bypass graft,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 127 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $643K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH