No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Center For Rehabilitation At Hampton Woods The

1517 East Western Reserve Road, Poland, OH 44514 · For profit - Individual · 26 certified beds · (330) 707-1300 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (330) 707-1300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 11 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
Worth asking about
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8580 South Ave · (330) 758-2303 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
9798 N Lima Rd · (330) 549-5522 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
574 McClurg Rd · (330) 743-6050 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Moore Rd · (330) 726-8107 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2250 E Western Reserve Rd · (330) 757-0727

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission36.0%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.1%12.9%12.0%typical

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 268 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

66.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.68hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.59hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 94 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF66.7%CMS range 60.6–71.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.8%CMS range 11.3–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge73.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge67.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.5%CMS range 5.1–13.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.081.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.53
RN hours/ resident / day
1.60
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.29
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.42
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.90
RN hoursweekends
45.7%
Total nursing turnover
28.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 26 beds and averages 20.8 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.42 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.53 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.29 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.56 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.77 to 0.90 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-31)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-24)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was safely stored and dated in both the kitchenette and the main facility kitchen. The facility also failed to maintain biannual cleaning of the hood system. This had the potential to affect all 21 residents residing in the facility. The facility identified all 21 residents as receiving food from the kitchen. Findings include:1. Observation of the kitchenette on 12/29/25 from 8:27 A.M. to 8:37 A.M. with Food Service Supervisor (FSS) #97 revealed sitting on a tray on top of the microwave was one 24-ounce container of Mrs. [NAME] Maple Syrup open to air due to the flip top part of the cap was missing. In the refrigerator, there was one five-pound container of cottage cheese half full with a best buy date of 12/18/25. At the time of observation FSS #97 confirmed the maple syrup was open to air, and the cottage cheese was outdated and should have been thrown away. Observation of the main kitchen on 12/29/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-31 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the commercial dryer was free from excessive lint build-up. This had the potential to affect all residents in facility. The facility census was 21.Findings include:Observation and interview with Laundry Supervisor #135 on 12/30/25 at 10:35 A.M. confirmed lint compartment on commercial dryer had quite a bit of lint and that it appeared to not have been cleaned out prior to use on 12/30/25. Laundry Supervisor #135 indicated that the lint compartment was to be cleaned twice each shift with staff initialing the sign off log located beside commercial dryer once a shift.Review of dryer lint log on 12/30/25 at 10:35 A. M. revealed it contained laundry staff initials of Laundry Supervisor #135 on 12/29/25 as having completed the lint cleaning for 12/29/25; however, during the observation and interview on 12/30/25 at 10:35 A.M., Laundry Supervisor #135 confirmed that it had not been cleaned out properly prior to being used on 12/30/25.Review of the undated laundry policy, Procedure D,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-31 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to develop and implement baseline care plans that include dates of completion/implementation, goals, instructions, and necessary interventions to be able to provide effective and person-centered care for Residents #17, #20, #31, #32, #33, #34, and #36. This affected seven residents (#17, #20, #31, #32, #33, #34, and #36) out of 15 residents whose care plans were reviewed. The facility census was 21.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 12/17/25 with diagnoses including periprosthetic fracture around the internal prosthetic left hip joint, generalized muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) without esophagitis, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, presence of unspecified artificial hip joint, anxiety disorder, essential (primary) hypertension, hypothyroidism, unspecified glaucoma, stage three chronic kidney disease,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for Resident #22. This affected one resident (#22) out of 15 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 21.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 11/15/25 with diagnoses including abscess of the liver, cerebral infarction (stroke), atherosclerotic heart disease, cognitive communication deficit, neoplasm (tumor) of liver, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (heart attack).Review of Resident #22's Fall Risk Assessments dated 11/15/25 revealed the resident was assessed to be a high fall risk.Review of Resident #22's care plan, initiated on 11/18/25, didn't address the resident was a high risk for falls. Review of facility document titled Investigation Report Record, dated 11/23/25, revealed while Resident #22 was sitting on the edge of the bed, the resident slid off the bed onto the floor with a new intervention to place bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place for Resident #22, who was at high risk for falls and had a history of falls at the facility. This affected one resident (#22) out of two residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 21.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 11/15/25 with diagnoses including abscess of the liver, cerebral infarction (stroke), atherosclerotic heart disease, cognitive communication deficit, neoplasm (tumor) of liver, non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (heart attack).Review of Resident #22's Fall Risk Assessments dated 11/15/25 revealed the resident was assessed to be a high fall risk.Review of Resident #22's care plan, initiated on 11/18/25, didn't address the resident was a high risk for falls. Review of facility document titled Investigation Report Record, dated 11/23/25, revealed while Resident #22 was sitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide nutritional supplements as ordered by the physician to Resident #22. This affected one resident (#22) out of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 21.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 11/15/25 with diagnoses including abscess of liver, type two diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (unusually high amount of glucose present in blood), cerebral infarction (stroke), atherosclerotic heart disease, cognitive communication deficit, neoplasm (tumor) of liver, and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (heart attack).Review of 12/08/25 discharge return anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #22 was independent for daily decision making, was independent for eating, and had a nonprescribed weight loss and was on a therapeutic diet.Review of Resident #22's 12/29/25 Minimum Data Set (MDS) Medicare five-day assessment and 12/18/25 MDS Medicare five day/End of PPS part A stay…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure proper storage of clean Hoyer lift pads (slings designed to cradle a person who is being transferred with a mechanical lift device). This had the potential to affect all residents in facility. The facility census was 21.Findings include: Observation of the dirty laundry room (the enclosed room where the soiled linen is stored, sorted, and washed) on 12/30/25 at 10:33 A.M. revealed clean Hoyer lift pads were stored on hook beside commercial washer on the dirty laundry side of the laundry room.Interview with Laundry Supervisor #135 on 12/30/25 at 10:33 A.M. confirmed the Hoyer pads hanging on the hook beside the commercial washing machines were clean. During the interview, Laundry Supervisor #135 stated that the proper storage site is in the clean laundry room (the adjacent room where clean laundry is brought to be dried, folded or hung to dry, then packed on linen carts to bring to the clean linen closets on the units) and that staff had been told several times that they were not to hang the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to notify Resident #12's physician that he had an active infection and was currently being isolated before sending him to an appointment at the physician's office. This affected one resident (#12) of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 23. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 03/19/24. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, type two diabetes mellitus, and diarrhea unspecified. Review of the hospital information sent to the facility on admission, printed on 03/19/24 revealed Resident #12 had a positive stool for clostridioides difficile (c-diff) on 03/14/24. Resident #12 was started on oral vancomycin 250 milligrams (mg) (antibiotic) four times daily on 03/19/24. Review of the physician's order dated 03/20/24 and discontinued on 04/02/24 revealed Resident #12 was to remain in contact isolation for c-diff. Review of the physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-24 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to provide residents and/or resident representatives of bed hold notice and/or bed hold policy upon discharge to the hospital. This affected four residents (#3, #11, #14, and #26) of four residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 17. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed admission date of 03/17/23 and a discharge date of 05/22/23 with diagnoses including pleural effusion (accumulation of excess fluid around the lungs), cystitis (inflammation of the urinary bladder), cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting left nondominant side and right dominant side, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease stage three, and systolic congestive heart failure, and depressive disorder. Review of the progress notes for Resident #3 revealed on 04/08/23 Resident #3 had increased edema to thighs and abdomen, and family had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #7's discharge assessment was submitted within 14 days after completion. This affected one resident (#7) of one resident reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 17. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 12/06/22 and a discharge date of 12/27/22. Medical diagnoses included diverticulitis (the inflammation or infection of small pouches) of large intestine, influenza, osteoarthritis of the right knee, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, obsessive compulsive disorder, anxiety, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (stomach acid repeatedly flows back up into the esophagus), and hypercholesterolemia (high cholesterol levels in the blood). The Discharge Return Not Anticipated Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed with an assessment reference date of 12/27/22. Review of the facility batch status report dated 05/23/23 revealed Resident #7's Discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to administer all doses of an antibiotic to treat a urinary tract infection for Resident #81. This affected one resident (#81) of three residents who were all receiving antibiotics for a urinary tract infection. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 05/12/23. Diagnoses included acute cystitis with hematuria, acute kidney failure, urinary tract infection (UTI), and cerebral infarction. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #81 had mild cognitive impairment. Resident #81 required limited one-person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene; and supervision with set up help only for eating. Resident #81 was always continent of urine and bowel. Review of the admission physician's order dated 05/12/23 revealed an order to administer Keflex (antibiotic) 250 milligrams every eight hours for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PRASAD HOLDING COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2026
DECLARATION OF TRUST NO. 2 OF KATHLEEN A. PRASAD DATED JULY 26, 2018Organization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2026
PRASAD, KATHYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2026
ANTALOCY, FRANKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/16/2013

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$3.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$367K
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 68%Other / private 32%

This home reported $367K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$479per resident / day
operating cost
$14,549per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$419per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Ohio Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366442. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next