Hampton Woods Nursing Center, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 54.4 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.76 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-11-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, facility policy and procedure review, self-reported incident (SRI) review, and facility investigation review the facility failed to prevent an incident of neglect when Resident #42 was not properly assisted with activities of daily living (ADL) including bed mobility, bathing, and incontinence care according to the resident care card to prevent an injury. Actual Harm occurred on 10/27/23 during the 7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. shift when Resident #42, who was dependent on staff for ADLs, including two-person assistance for bed mobility, bathing, and toileting, was found with significant bruising including deep purple bruises on her forehead, under her left and right eyes, and on the outside of her left eye. The injuries were determined by the facility to be the result of Agency State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #611 providing care without another staff member assisting on 10/27/23 during the 7:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M. shift for the resident including a bed bath, changing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-11-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of the facility policy and interview the facility failed to ensure timely assessments were completed and adequate interventions were implemented to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for Resident #14. Actual Harm occurred on 10/03/23 when Resident #14, who was totally dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADL) including bed mobility, toileting, and transfers was found to have an unstageable (full thickness tissue loss in which the actual depth of the ulcer was obscured by slough/ dead skin) pressure ulcer to his left gluteal (buttock) area. There was no documented evidence of adequate intervention(s) or monitoring to prevent the development of this wound or to ensure the pressure ulcer was identified prior to being unstageable. This affected one resident (#14) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 06/28/23 with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, self-reported incident (SRI) review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to prevent the tampering with and possible diversion of resident liquid morphine. This failure had the potential to affect three residents (#18, #32, and #36) who were receiving morphine at the time of the incident of three residents reviewed for abuse, neglect and misappropriation. The facility census was 60.Findings include:1. A review of medical records for Resident #18 revealed a date of admission of 08/16/21. Significant diagnoses included senile degeneration of the brain and end stage heart failure. The resident was admitted to hospice care with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF) on 05/19/21. Resident #18 had physician's orders for Acetaminophen 650 milligrams (analgesic) by mouth every four hours as needed for pain, Morphine sulfate 20 milligrams per milliliter (opioid pain medication), give 0.5 milliliters by mouth every four hours as needed for pain and give 0.5 milliliters…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #63 had an accurate advanced directive on file. This affected one resident (#63) of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 52.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #63 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of acute kidney failure, muscle weakness, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #63 had an order for do not resuscitate comfort care arrest (DNR CCA) which allowed for full medical treatment to be provided up until the point a patients' heart or breathing stops.Review of the Resident Care Card dated 03/04/26 revealed Resident #63 code status was DNR CCA.Further review of the electronic record revealed it did not contain a signed advanced directive, living will, or healthcare power of attorney determining the code status would be DNR CCA. Observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and family interview, staff interview, review of facility medication incident report, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors. This affected one resident (Resident #9) out of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 53.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 05/23/25 with diagnoses including hypertension, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, anemia, history of falls and history of fracture of right femur. Review of the facility document titled Medication Incident Report dated 07/14/25 at 10:45 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #805 gave Resident #9 the wrong medications during their 9:00 A.M. medication pass. RN #805 did not verify she had the right resident and RN #805 administered the following wrong medications: Amlodipine (treats high blood pressure), Bupropion (antidepressant), Lisinopril (treats high blood pressure),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to timely notify the hospice provider of Resident #62's change in condition, resulting in an unwanted transfer to the Emergency Department (ED). This affected one resident (Resident #62) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 08/07/19 and a discharge date of 11/11/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, altered mental status, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 was severely cognitively impaired. She required supervision for eating, partial to moderate assistance for oral and personal hygiene, substantial to maximum assistance for toileting, dressing, and was dependent for showering. She received hospice services. Review of the nurses' note dated 10/01/24 at 12:53 P.M. revealed Resident #62 was admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-10 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespread
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, and review of facility mealtimes, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered a snack as required when there was greater than 14 hours between dinner and breakfast. This had the potential to affect all residents except for one resident (#44) identified by the facility as receiving nothing by mouth. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Interview on 10/08/24 at 11:52 A.M. with Resident #15 revealed the staff only bring snacks if you ask for them, and he gets hungry some nights. Interview on 10/08/24 at 11:54 A.M. with Resident #16 revealed she gets hungry at night, and the staff don't come around to ask if we want snacks. Observations during dinner time on 10/08/24 revealed Resident #6 received dinner at approximately 5:03 P.M. and breakfast on 10/09/24 at approximately 8:15 A.M., which was approximately 15 hours from dinner to breakfast, Review of undated facility document titled Hampton Woods Mealtimes revealed there were 15 hours between…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Tuberculosis (TB) Risk Assessment was completed in an accurate manner. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the facility provided TB Risk Assessment revealed the assessment was completed on 01/2023. On 10/08/24 at 10:15 A.M. the Administrator was made aware that the TB Risk assessment provided was dated 01/2023 and was asked to provide an updated TB Risk Assessment. Review of updated facility provided TB Risk Assessment revealed a completion date of 01/2024. Interview on 10/08/24 at 11:45 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the updated TB Risk Assessment was completed on 10/07/24. The DON further stated when she had gone through the state readiness binder to ensure everything was completed, she found that there was not an up-to-date TB Risk Assessment. The DON stated that was when she completed the TB Risk Assessment and dated it as completed 01/2024 when it was actually completed on 10/07/24.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7 was fed in a dignified manner. This affected one resident (#7) out of five residents in the facility identified as needing physical assistance with meals. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included wedge compression fracture of unspecified thoracic vertebra, essential primary hypertension, moderate protein calorie malnutrition, malaise, major depressive disorder, and unspecified dementia. Review of the care plan dated 08/26/22 revealed Resident #7 was at risk for dehydration and weight loss related to dementia, malnutrition, mechanically altered diet, history of decreased appetite and not wanting supplements. Interventions included assisting with meals as needed, and encouraging completion of meals and fluids daily. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident Do Not Resuscitate forms were appropriately filled out for Residents #262 and #15. This finding affected two residents (#262 and #15) out of two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 60. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #262 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included acute kidney failure, calculus of kidney, obstructive and reflux uropathy, cognitive communication deficit, peripheral vascular disease, and occlusion and stenosis of bilateral carotid arteries. Review of Resident #262 physician orders revealed an order that stated Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNR-CCA) dated 09/18/24. Review of Resident #262's care plan dated 09/19/24 revealed the care plan did not include advanced directives. Review of the Medicare Five-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #262 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #262…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of daily weight gains of two or more pounds in a day or of blood sugar over 300 per physician order. This affected one resident (#23) of one resident reviewed for daily weights and had the potential to affect nine residents (#1, #4, #6, #13, #16, #20, #35, #43, and #47) who had orders for daily weights. This also affected one resident (#27) out of one resident reviewed for blood sugars and had the potential to affect 12 residents (#1, #2, #10, #16, #17, #21, #24, #27, #45, #47, #52, #164) who received blood glucose monitoring. The facility census was 60. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 12/28/20 with diagnoses including diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and altered mental status. Review of the care plan dated 12/08/23 revealed Resident #27 had diabetes. Interventions included medication as ordered,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, review of the Internet Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (iQIES) Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Validation Report, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #19's MDS assessments were submitted in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#19) out of 23 residents reviewed for MDS submission. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 06/23/24. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, depressive disorder, primary osteoarthritis, disorder of thyroid, anxiety disorder, essential hypertension (high blood pressure), and atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rhythm). Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed the 08/11/24 quarterly MDS 3.0 assessment had been completed, but there was no indication it had been submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) as required. Review of the IQIES MDS Final Validation Report submitted on 10/08/24 at 3:49 P.M. revealed Resident #19's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/11/24, was submitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $742K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH