Hill View Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Cente

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 108 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 64% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-12-10 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility's fall investigation, review of the hospital notes, review of the Medscape guidance, and review of the facility's pain management policy, the facility failed to provide adequate pain management for one resident. This result in Actual Harm for Resident #64 who screamed out in pain at multiple staff, receiving a delay and appropriate treatment of pain beginning 10/30/25 at 6:30 P.M. to 10/31/25 at 12:40 A.M. This resulted in an emergency room visit for acute pain and reporting a severe pain level of nine (pain scale from zero indicating no pain to ten being worst pain). This affected one (Resident #64) of three residents reviewed for pain control. The facility census was 72.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #64 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to another facility on 11/10/25. Diagnoses included osteoporosis, osteopenia, atherosclerosis, and a history of bone demineralization. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the environment was maintained in good repair. This had the potential to effect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 64.Findings include:Observations on 08/08/25 from 10:22 A.M. through 11:30 A.M., during a tour of the facility, revealed a large portion of the ceiling in the second-floor dining room was missing. The area below the missing ceiling had yellow caution tape set up to keep people from walking underneath it. Continued observation of the second-floor hallway, outside of Resident #2's room, revealed discolored ceiling tiles and water was leaking down into a large and a small trash can placed underneath. The ceiling tiles had a black substance on them, which appeared mold or mildew like. Further observation of the third-floor hallway, located outside of Resident #63's room, revealed discolored ceiling tiles from what appeared to be water damage, and the carpet underneath the area was wet. The ceiling vents, located directly inside the doorways of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) with new mental illness diagnoses for residents. This affected two (Residents #28 and #33) of 18 residents reviewed for PASARR completion. The facility census was 53 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 10/04/19 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, hypertension, encephalopathy and major depressive disorder. On 09/07/21 Resident #28 was diagnosed with unspecified psychosis. Review of the admission PASARR document for Resident #28 dated 09/04/19 revealed the had no indications of serious mental illness or developmental disability. Review of the plan of care for Resident #28 dated 02/26/24 revealed the resident had unspecified psychosis with paranoia, hallucinations and increased anxiety. Interventions included the following: monitor and record occurrences of target behavior symptoms such as pacing, wandering, disrobing, inappropriate response to verbal communication,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, and staff interview the facility failed to provide adequate nail care to dependent residents. This affected one (Resident #13) of five dependent residents reviewed for bathing and nail care. The facility census was 53 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 08/31/22 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, dementia, and diabetes mellitus type two. Review of the care plan for Resident #13 dated 08/31/22 revealed staff would clean and trim the resident's nails weekly, as needed, and when soiled. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #13 dated 04/12/24 revealed the resident was unable to make her needs known as she rarely/never was understood. Resident #13 was dependent on the assistance of staff with bathing and nail care. Review of shower sheet for Resident #13 dated 06/30/24 revealed the resident had received bathing per the schedule with nail care documented as completed 06/30/24. Observation on 06/30/24 at 1:38 P.M. of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and online guidance, the facility failed to adequately implement care plans and interventions. This affected three residents (#3, #29, and #31) of 20 residents whose care plans were reviewed during the annual survey. The facility census was 49. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #29 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, stage three chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and systolic heart failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/03/22, revealed this resident had moderately impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 03. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of the active care plans for this resident revealed no care plan was implemented for wandering, being at risk for elopement, or the use of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to revise a resident's plan of care to reflect the pressure ulcer prevention device of Prevalon Boots. This affected one of six residents (#12) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 07/20/17 with diagnoses including dementia, unspecified psychosis, weakness and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (3.0) dated 04/08/22 revealed Resident #12 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #12 was totally dependent on one person for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #12 had impaired range of motion to bilateral upper extremities. Resident #12 had no skin impairments documented. Review of the physician telephone orders for Resident #12 revealed an order dated 05/03/22 for the resident to wear Prevalon boots while in bed. Staff may remove for dressing and hygiene per resident's tolerance. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure pressure prevention devices were in place as ordered by the physician. The affected two of five residents (#12 and #3) reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 49. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 03/05/22 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #3 dated 06/12/22 revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with no behaviors. Resident #3 required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Resident #3 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #3 had an unstageable pressure ulcer (defined as full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place as per the plan of care and failed to ensure evidence of monitoring a resident who was at risk for elopement. This affected two residents (#29 and #44) of the five residents reviewed for falls and elopement during the annual survey. The facility census was 49. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #29 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, stage three chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and systolic heart failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/03/22, revealed this resident had moderately impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 03. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of the active care plans for this resident revealed no care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of a dialysis residents AV shunt. This affected the one resident (#31) who was receiving dialysis while residing in the facility. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Record review for Resident #31 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including stage four chronic kidney disease, dementia without behavioral disturbances, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. Review of the admission MDS assessment, dated 04/23/22, revealed this resident had moderately impaired cognation evidenced by a BIMS assessment score of 07. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from two staff members for bed mobility and extensive assistance from one staff member for transfers and toileting. Review of the care plan, dated 5/23/22, revealed this resident received dialysis. The only intervention listed was to send a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to provide an appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic and failed to discontinue an antianxiety medication due to non-use. This affected two residents(Resident #44 and Resident #201) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 49. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #201 on 06/22/22 at 3:28 P.M. revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses: left femur fracture, dysphagia, muscle weakness, anemia, depression, anxiety, hypertension, carotid artery stenosis, gastroenteritis, chronic kidney disease, diarrhea, and transient ischemic attacks. This resident is currently alert and oriented to person, place, and time per admission assessment and nursing notes as this resident does not have an active BIMS score as this resident has been residing in the facility for approximately 2 days. Review of Physician Orders revealed this resident is receiving the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-06-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored appropriately and provided for the use intended. This affected one resident (#48) out of the 49 residents observed during the annual survey. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Record review for Resident #48 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia without behavioral disturbances, anxiety, insomnia, and asthma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/05/22, revealed this resident had mildly impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 11. This resident was assessed to require extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of the care plan, dated 06/13/22, revealed this resident had asthma and shortness of breath. Interventions included to give…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH