Robert A Barnes Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 114 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.91 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 100% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 25 beds and averages 21.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.06 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 7.26 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.72 to 1.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility transfer notices, the facility failed to ensure appropriate transfer/discharge notifications were made to the state Ombudsman office. This affected three residents (#16, #22 and #23) of three resident records reviewed for discharge. The census was 18. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hydrocephalus, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, depression, dysarthria, and anarthria. Review of Resident #16's admission 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was moderately impaired. He required supervision or touching assistance for eating and partial/moderate assistance for oral hygiene, toileting, shower/bathing, dressing and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #16's physicians orders revealed an order to discharge the resident home with Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy, a home health aide and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed as required. This affected one resident (#16) of 17 residents records reviewed for MDS assessments. The census was 18. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hydrocephalus, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, depression, dysarthria and anarthria. Review of Resident #16's admission 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was moderately impaired. He required supervision or touching assistance for eating and partial/moderate assistance for oral hygiene, toileting, shower/bathing, dressing and personal hygiene. It also noted he was occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. Review of Resident #16's physicians orders revealed an order to discharge the resident home with Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy, a home health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed as required. This affected one resident (#16) of 17 residents records reviewed for MDS assessments. The census was 18. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hydrocephalus, Alzheimer's disease with early onset, depression, dysarthria and anarthria. Review of Resident #16's admission 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was moderately impaired. He required supervision or touching assistance for eating and partial/moderate assistance for oral hygiene, toileting, shower/bathing, dressing and personal hygiene. It also noted he was occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. Review of Resident #16's physicians orders revealed an order to discharge the resident home with Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Speech Therapy, a home health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility menu spreadsheets, the facility failed to provide a varied menu for a resident on a pureed diet. This affected one resident (Resident #7) and had the potential to affect two residents (#1 and #7) receiving a pureed diet. The facility census was 18. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed that she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dysphagia and gastrostomy status. Review of Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment dated [DATE] revealed that she had intact cognitive status. Review of Resident #7's physician orders dated 06/10/25 revealed that she was on a regular diet of pureed consistency and thin liquids. Review of the pureed menu spreadsheets from 04/06/25 through 05/18/25 (42 days), approved by Registered Dietitian #110, revealed that green beans were served 20 times and mashed potatoes were served 34 times. Interview with Resident #7 on 06/16/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to prepare pureed diets at the proper consistency. This had the potential to affect two residents (Resident #1 and #7) that the facility identified as receiving a pureed diet consistency. The facility census was 18. Findings include: Interview with Sous Chef #112 on 06/17/25 at 11:04 A.M. revealed that all pureed foods should be served at a smooth pudding-like consistency with no chunks. Observation and interview on 06/17/25 at 11:03 A.M. revealed Line [NAME] #115 began the preparation of the pureed chicken tenders. At 11:10 A.M., Line [NAME] #115 indicated verbally that the chicken tenders were at puree consistency and ready to be tested. Observation via taste of the pureed chicken tenders on 06/17/25 at 11:10 A.M. revealed that there were visible lumps and chunks in the puree chicken tenders, and that the consistency was not homogenous. Interview with Sous Chef #112 on 06/17/25 at 11:10 A.M. verified that the puree chicken tenders had chunks in them. Observation and interview on 06/17/25 from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-06-01 · tag F0730 — widespread
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of personnel files and interviews the facility failed to complete employee evaluations for four of four State Tested Nurse's Aides (STNAs) reviewed for personnel files (STNAs #130, #134, #148, and #164). This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 22. Findings include: 1. Review of personnel file for STNA #164 hired on 02/01/21 had no evidence of a 90-day evaluation or an annual evaluation since hire. 2. Review of personnel file for STNA #130 hired on 03/21/22 had no evidence of a 90-day evaluation or an annual evaluation since hire. 3. Review of personnel file for STNA #134 hired on 04/21/22 had no evidence of a 90-day evaluation or an annual evaluation since hire. 4. Review of personnel file for STNA #148 hired on 02/21/23 had no evidence of a 90-day evaluation since hire. Interview on 06/01/23 at 3:20 P.M. with Director of Human Resources #175 revealed facility was not doing any performance evaluations since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and revealed they had recently restarted performance evaluations for newly hired staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-06-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage of all food materials in the dry storage, refrigerator, and freezer areas. This had the potential to affect all 22 residents as they all received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 22. Findings include: Observation and interview on 05/30/23 at 9:39 A.M. with Dining Staff #144 in the unit kitchenettes revealed: • frozen pancakes with no date • unsealed ice cream • a yellow liquid substance in a bottle in dry storage with no label and no date • several spice containers that expired 03/21/18 Interview with Dining Staff #144 at the time of the observations confirmed the above findings. Observation and interview on 05/20/23 at 10:45 A.M. with Dietary Manager #136 in the main kitchen revealed six bottles of lime juice were found to have expired 02/27/23. Dietary Manager #136 confirmed the finding at the time of the observation. Review of the facility policy titled Food Supply and Storage Procedures, dated 10/13/12, revealed all food shall be stored in such a manner…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #129's indwelling urinary catheter bag was covered for dignity and privacy. This affected one resident (#129) of one resident reviewed for dignity related to urinary catheter bags. The facility identified four residents (#6, #12, #129, and #178) with urinary catheters. The facility census was 22. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #129 revealed an admission date of 05/31/23. Diagnoses included wedge compression fracture, diabetes, epidural hemorrhage, dementia, and pulmonary hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] was still in process and had not yet been completed. Review of the physician's order dated 05/24/23 revealed resident had an indwelling urinary catheter and required catheter care. Observation on 05/30/23 at 2:20 P.M. revealed Resident #129 had a urinary catheter. The urinary catheter bag contained urine and was hanging below the bed and visible from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #14 was offered an initial care conference. This affected one resident (#14) of two residents reviewed for care conferences. The facility census was 22. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed a readmission date of 05/09/23. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, Fournier's gangrene, vascular disease, muscle weakness, and colostomy status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact with and required limited to extensive assistance of one staff member for all activities of daily living and mobility. Interview on 05/30/23 at 1:52 P.M. with Resident #14 revealed he would like to participate in care conference meetings and would like his daughter to be invited as well. Resident #14 reported he had not been invited to any care conferences since admission in 04/2023 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-06-01 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, medical record review, and review of the facility's discharge policy and procedure, the facility failed to notify the Ombudsman when residents were discharged from the facility. This affected three residents (#10, #16 and #78) out of three residents reviewed for discharges. The facility census was 22. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 4/22/23 with a fractured right clavicle, cerebral infarction, and type two diabetes. He was discharged on 05/12/23. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 4/15/23. Diagnoses of unspecified fracture part of the neck, osteoporosis with pathological fracture of the vertebra, and emphysema. Resident #16 was discharged home on 5/15/23. Review of Resident #78's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/07/23 for rehabilitation. Diagnoses included chronic cholecystitis, type two diabetes, emphysema, and congestive heart failure. He was discharged from the facility on 04/18/23. Interview on 05/31/23 at 11:49 A.M. with Licensed Social Worker (LSW)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $437K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH