Ohio Veterans Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 427 beds and averages 241.9 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 185 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.05 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY Based on review of the medical record, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of an SRI investigation, review of staff statements, review of the staffing schedule, review of employee time records, review of a police report, review of video surveillance, review of an incident report, staff interviews, resident interview, family interview, and review of facility policy, the facility staff failed to ensure Resident #241 was free from staff to resident verbal and physical abuse. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when Resident #241 was thrown from his wheelchair on 09/16/25 at approximately 7:50 P.M. by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #602 placing the resident at risk for potential serious life-threatening harm, injuries, and/or negative health outcomes. Additionally, the facility failed to protect the resident from further abuse and failed to immediately report resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a self-reported incident (SRI) and related investigation documents, review of a hospital record, review of an employee skills checklist, and policy review, the facility failed to complete resident transfers using a mechanical lift with appropriate assistance as care planned and as ordered. Actual Harm occurred on 04/29/25 when Resident #2, who was care planned for two-person assistance with all personal care and had a physician order to always be transferred using two people, was transferred in her room by one staff member using a mechanical lift without assistance. Resident #2 sustained a right femur fracture as a result of the improper transfer. This affected one (#2) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 223. Findings Include: Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, peripheral vascular disease, and constipation. Review of the most recent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2019-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, review of hospital documentation, review of mechanical lift manufacturer instructions, review of facility mechanical lift policy, and review of facility incident investigation documentation, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with appropriate supervision during a transfer using a mechanical lift. This resulted in actual harm when Resident #433 sustained a 5.0 centimeter (cm) laceration to the right anterior shin which required suturing. The resident was being transferred with a mechanical lift with only one staff person. This affected one (Resident #433) of three residents reviewed for use of mechanical lift for transferring. Facility census was 390. Findings include; Review of the medical record revealed Resident #433 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included myasthenia gravis, type II diabetes mellitus, dementia, major depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, post traumatic stress disorder,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of a facility investigation, review of staff witness statements, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy to provide timely interventions and further failed to provide notification to the appropriate medical and support staff for follow-up services. This affected one (#193) of eight residents reviewed for abuse and had the potential to affect all 25 residents on the Unit 3 South. The facility census was 242.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #193 revealed an admission date of 08/29/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, hypertension, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) dated 01/27/26 revealed staff reported an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse for Resident #193. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of a facility investigation, review of staff witness statements, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to report allegations of staff to resident abuse. This affected six (#244, #93, #243, #129, #193, #6) of eight residents reviewed for abuse and had the potential to affect all 25 residents on the Unit 3 South. The facility census was 242. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #193 revealed an admission date of 08/29/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, hypertension, and dysphagia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) dated 01/27/26 revealed staff reported an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse for Resident #193. Review of a follow-up investigation report revealed staff witnessed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, review of a Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of a facility investigation, review of staff witness statements, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of staff to resident abuse. This affected six (#244, #93, #243, #129, #193, #6) of eight residents reviewed for abuse and had the potential to affect all 25 residents on the Unit 3 South. The facility census was 242. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #193 revealed an admission date of 08/29/24. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, anxiety, hypertension, and dysphagia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI) dated 01/27/26 revealed staff reported an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse for Resident #193. Review of a follow-up investigation report revealed staff witnessed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of staff statements, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food items were provided per physician orders. This affected one (#93) of three residents reviewed for dietary services and had the potential to affect 14 residents identified by the facility with physician orders for mechanically altered diet textures. The facility census was 242.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #93 revealed an admission date of 09/05/18. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis, dementia, type two diabetes mellitus, and dysphagia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on staff for feeding assistance. Review of the care plan last revised 02/03/26 revealed the resident was at risk for aspiration due to a history of dysphagia. Interventions included to monitor for choking and for signs/symptoms of aspiration and notify…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRIs) and investigation documents, staff and resident interview, and review a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal and physical abuse. This affected three (#3, #4, and #5) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 223. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, high blood pressure, and depression. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff persons for completing his activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of an SRI and corresponding investigation documents dated 03/20/25 revealed, on 02/06/25, staff witnesses reported that Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #102 was deliberately agitating Resident #3 while other staff were providing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-06 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI) and related investigation documents, staff and resident interview, review of local new reports, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation. This affected one (#1) of five residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 223. Findings Include: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type two diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and gout. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact and required hands on assistance from one staff person for completing his activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of an SRI and corresponding investigation documentation dated 03/31/25 revealed the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a self-reported incident (SRI) and related investigation documents, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of abuse to the State Survey Agency in a timely manner. This affected one (#3) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 223. Findings Include: Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, high blood pressure, and depression. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance of two staff persons for completing his activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of an SRI and corresponding investigation documents dated 03/20/25 revealed, on 02/06/25, staff witnesses reported Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #102 was deliberately agitating Resident #3 while other staff were providing Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-28 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
  Have policies on smoking.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, review of a police report, review of an incident report, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was adequately assessed for unsupervised smoking and failed to follow the smoking policy. This affected one (#84) of three residents reviewed for smoking safety. The facility identified 38 residents who smoked. The facility census was 223. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #84 had an admission date of 12/30/13 and a readmission date of 10/20/23. Diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, type two diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis, anxiety disorder, depression, unspecified psychosis, insomnia, and polyneuropathy. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. The resident required supervision for walking and was independent in wheelchair. Review of the care plan initiated 10/29/23 for Resident #84 revealed the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide the resident with a table of appropriate height to ensure proper eating for one (#139) of 40 sampled residents. The facility census was 186. Finding include: Review of Resident #139's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 05/18/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, dementia, major depression, diabetes and prostate cancer. Review of Resident #139's record identified on 06/01/23 his weight was 161 pounds and on 01/02/24 his weight was 141 pounds, which was a 12.4% loss. Review of Resident #139's plan of care for nutritional concerns identified Resident #139's goal was to ensure adequate intake to prevent weight loss. The plan included interventions for dining which included to ensure the resident was in an upright posture for oral intake and alternating solids and liquids with each bite. Observation of Resident #139 on 01/10/24 at 8:29 A.M., revealed the resident was in the dining room. The dining room was observed with tables of varying heights. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of medical records, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were included in their care plan meetings. This affected two (#17 and #95) of 40 sampled residents. The facility census was 186. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #17's medical record identified admission to the facility occurred on 05/24/19. Diagnoses included major depression, diabetes, obesity and anxiety. The records identified Resident #17 with intact cognition. Review of care meeting notes dated 07/27/23 at 11:54 A.M. identified no participation including Resident #17 in his care plan choices. Review of Resident #17's most recent care meeting notes dated 11/09/23 at 12:15 P.M. identified the meeting was held on a phone conference; however, the conference did not include the resident. Interview with Resident #17 on 01/08/24 at 11:51 A.M. revealed he has not attended any care plan meetings, but would like to. Interview with Licensed Social Worker (LSW) #700 on 01/11/24 at 10:04 A.M. revealed residents were not being invited to their care meetings because I share an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH