Fair Haven Shelby County
2901 Fair Road, Sidney, OH 45365 · Government - County · 90 certified beds · (937) 492-6900 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.2% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.0% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.2% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 34.7% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.7% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.8% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.7% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 67.6% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.5% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.1% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.86 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.06 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 105 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 56.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.4%CMS range 36.5–51.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 7.6–16.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 56.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.7–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.25 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 63.4 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.65 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of a facility investigation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident was properly transferred from a recliner chair to a bed by a Hoyer (mechanical Lift). This resulted in Actual Harm when the Hoyer lift tipped over during transfer by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #200 and Resident #55 hit her face on the floor. Resident #55 sustained facial fractures, a subdural hematoma (bleeding between brain and outer covering), and a facial laceration that required medical transport by helicopter and hospital admission. This affected one (#55) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 65. Findings include: Review of Resident #55's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/09/19. Diagnoses included hypertension, chronic fatigue, bladder cancer, osteoarthritis, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was cognitively intact and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, observation, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served and stored in a safe and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 64.Finding include:Review of food temperature logs from 01/10/26 through 02/26/26 with Dietary Manager (DM) #156 revealed the only meals with recorded temperatures during the review period were: 01/10/26 (breakfast, lunch, dinner), 01/10/26 (unspecified meal), 01/12/26 (dinner), 02/10/26 (lunch and dinner), 02/11/26 (lunch and dinner), 02/12/26 (breakfast, lunch, dinner), 02/13/26 (lunch), 02/14/26 (breakfast), 02/15/26 (breakfast), 02/16/26 (breakfast), 02/21/26 (breakfast, lunch, dinner, and one unspecified meal), and 02/22/26 (breakfast, lunch, dinner). All remaining required meal service times lacked documented food temperatures.Interview on 02/27/26 at 10:10 A.M. with DM #156 confirmed kitchen staff do not routinely check food temperatures as required. DM #156 confirmed she was unable to provide consistent and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure prescription medication was stored in a locked secured location and not within reach of the residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled for opening, labeled for expiration, disposed of when expired and stored only with medications. This had the potential to affect all 62 residents in the facility who received medications. The facility census is 62. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission on [DATE], with diagnoses that include but not limited to Parkinson's disease, syncope and collapse, pacemaker, bulbous pemphioid, orthostatic hypotension, acute kidney failure, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, and neuromuscular dysfunction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #26 revealed an impaired cognition. Resident #26 required set up or clean up assistance for eating,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of the facility menu, and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure all residents received a balanced and nutritious meal. This had the potential to affect six residents (#01, #02, #19, #31, #26, and #53) who receive a pureed diet and did not receive bread or the desert, as well as all of the residents, who did not receive the desert. Resident #28 was identified as not receiving anything by mouth and is not affected. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Observation on 06/04/25 at 10:00 A.M. revealed [NAME] #237 preparing the pureed foods. No bread was added to the beef patty, nor the roasted zucchini. Review of the menu served on 06/04/25 included beef pepper patty, mashed potatoes, roasted zucchini, choice of roll, and cherry crisp. Observation on 06/04/25 from 11:27 A.M. to 1:20 P.M., revealed [NAME] #265 served the meals and was assisted by Dietary Manager (DM) #214 preparing the trays for delivery. The meal consisted of a beef pepper patty, mashed potatoes with gravy, roasted zucchini, a dinner roll, margarine, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure the kitchens were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition and foods were stored in a manner to avoid contamination and spoilage. The facility also failed to ensure the dishes were sanitized when using the dishwasher. Furthermore, the facility failed to maintain the ice machines in the smaller kitchen areas in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all residents but one (#32) who received foods prepared in the kitchens. The facility census was 62. Findings include: A tour of the kitchen on 06/02/25, beginning at 8:20 A.M. and ending at 8:50 A.M., revealed the floors were dull with many food particles scattered everywhere. The aluminum hand sink is stained brown and no covered trash bin was near. Food particles were noted on most surfaces, the sugar bin had dried food splatters on the exterior and a paper bag of sugar with a scoop inside the bin. The oatmeal and flour bins also had dried food splatters on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-11 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a full-time Licensed Nursing Home Administrator was available at least sixteen hours weekly. This had the potential to affect all 62 residents in the facility. The faciltiy census was 62. Findings include: Observation on 06/02/25, 06/03/25, 06/04/25, 06/05/25, 06/06/25 and 06/09/25, from 8:00 A.M. through 5:00 P.M. revealed no Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) available. Interview on 06/09/25 at 10:35 A.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was not an active LNHA working in the facility. Interview also confirmed the current LNHA #6468 has been on medical leave since 05/21/25 and has not been in the facility since 05/21/25. Interview also confirmed she was not aware of a policy related to LNHA coverage and she was not aware of the regulation requiring a LNHA in the facility at least sixteen hours weekly.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have a comprehensive Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI). This had the potential to affect all 62 residents in the facility. Findings include: Record review on 06/09/25 at 5:20 P.M. of the current QAPI information available revealed no current program information available. QAPI book available had no program information present. The book contained meeting information from November 2024. There was no participation documented in the book. Interview on 06/09/25 at 5:20 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) at the time of observation confirmed no current program information available. Interview confirmed the QAPI book available had no program information present. The book contained meeting information from November 2024. There was no participation documented in the book.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-11 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) took action and investigated underlying causes and factors contributing to problems. This had the potential to affect all 62 residents in the facility. Findings include: Record review on 06/09/25 at 5:20 P.M. of the current QAPI information available revealed actions or investigations have been completed for problems. The QAPI book contained no documents with actions taken or investigations to find underlying causes for problems in the facility. meeting information from November 2024. There was no participation documented in the book. Interview on 06/09/25 at 5:20 P.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) at the time of observation confirmed no current investigations or actions being taken for current problems.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-11 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) committee met on a regular basis. This had the potential to affect all 62 residents in the facility. Findings include: Record review on 06/09/25 at 5:20 P.M. revealed there was no current QAPI committee meeting information available. The QAPI book had meeting information available for November 2024. Interview on 06/20/25 at 5:20 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) at the time of the observation confirmed there was no information available of QAPI meetings being held since November 2024.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-11 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a pest-free environment. This had the potential to affect all residents (except Resident #32) who receive food served from the kitchen. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Observation on 06/02/25 at 10:50 A.M. revealed a moderate amount of gnats flying around the juice and soda dispensing machine located in the serving area of the dining room on the skilled nursing unit. Interview on 06/02/25 at 10:55 A.M. with Food Service Worker #274 revealed the gnats have been there for quite some time. A subsequent observation on 06/04/25 at 11:00 A.M. revealed the gnats to still be present. Review of the undated policy titled Integrated Pest Management, revealed the facility will follow guidelines for preventative procedures for pest management.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the care plans were updated to reflect the current physician order, change in diagnosis and include interventions. This affected five (#9, #26, #41, #46, and #54) of 23 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 09/17/21. Diagnoses include cerebral infarction and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively impaired and had impairment of upper extremities. Review of the physician order dated 09/27/24 revealed to gently open right fingers and place a pillow splint in palm with strap over knuckles. Keep in hand at all times, except during hygiene for contracture management. Review of the care plan initiated 11/02/22 revealed to apply the hand splint when in bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility staff failed to sign out narcotics when administered. This affected seven (#4, #7, #11, #20, #22, #26, and #43) of 62 residents in the facility randomly observed during medication cart review. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Observation on 06/04/25 at 12:59 P.M., of Sycamore Hall medication cart with Registered Nurse (RN) #262 revealed Resident #7's Lorazepam 0.5 milligram (mg) one (1) tablet signed out during cart inspection and Oxycodone 5 mg 1 tablet signed out during cart inspection, and Resident #26's Alprazolam 0.5 mg 1 tablet signed out during cart inspection. Observation on 06/04/25 at 1:05 P.M., of Sycamore Hall medication cart with RN #262 revealed Resident #7's Lorazepam 0.5 mg count sheet revealed 11 tablets remaining, medication card shows 10 tablets present. Interview on 06/04/25 at 1:05 P.M., with RN #262 confirmed Resident #7's Lorazepam 0.5 mg and Oxycodone 5 mg was signed out during cart inspection, and Resident #26's Alprazolam 0.5 mg was signed out during cart inspection. RN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, review of medication inserts, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication were administered per physician orders and medications were documented when administered. This affected 16 (#4, #6, #7, #11, #15, #17, #18, #22, #26, #31, #32, #35, #43, #53, #61, and #115) of 62 residents in the facility. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Observation on 06/04/25 at 12:59 P.M. of Sycamore Medication Cart Narcotic Count Sheets with Registered Nurse (RN) #262 revealed Resident #7's Lorazepam 0.5 mg narcotic count sheet was off by two, one tablet signed out at time of observation. Resident #7's Oxycodone 5 mg narcotic count sheet was off by one, one table signed out at time of observation. Resident #26's Alprazolam 0.5 mg narcotic count sheet was off by one, one tablet signed off at time of observation. Interview on 06/04/25 at 1:05 P.M., with Registered Nurse (RN) #262 confirmed Resident #7's Lorazepam 0.5 mg narcotic count sheet was off by two, one tablet signed out at time of observation. Resident #7's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-11 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure the refrigerator used by family to store foods brought in from outside for residents was maintained in a clean manner. This had the potential to affect 44 (#03, #04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #10, #11, #12, #13, #15, #16, #18, #20, #21, #22, #23, #26, #28, #30, #31, #33, #34, #35, #36, #38, #40, #42, #43, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #52, #53, #54, #55, #57, #59, #115, #116, #165, and #215) of 44 residents who utilized the refrigerator The facility census was 62. Findings include: Observation on 06/02/25 at 2:34 P.M. revealed four plastic dishes in the resident refrigerator, located in the lounge area near room [ROOM NUMBER], without dates, one plastic dish dated 04/30/25, and one small dish of salsa dated 04/15/25. The floor of the refrigerator was covered in food particles. Interview at the time of discovery with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #258 revealed all of the food dishes belonged to Resident #12, and verified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, observation, review of the Sani-Cloth Bleach wipes container instructions, review of glucometer manufacture's recommendations, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was completed during a pressure ulcer dressing change for Resident #49; failed to ensure recommendations for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were initiated for Resident #26; failed to ensure gloves were worn during assistance with food for Resident #17 and #56; and failed to ensure glucometer was properly cleaned for Resident #115. This affected four residents (#17, #26, #49, and #56), with the potential to affect a limited number of resident who received assistance with meals, glucometer checks or were on enhanced barrier protection. The census was 62. Findings included 1. Medical record review for Resident #49 revealed an admission assessment dated [DATE] with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity, when staff stood over residents while providing assistance with eating. This affected three (#2, #37, and #41) of three residents reviewed for feeding assistance. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed and admission date of 11/12/20, with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, severe, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident has a memory problem and cognitive skills were severely impaired. Resident #2 was dependent on staff assistance with all activities of daily living (ADL)s. Review of the care plan dated 12/04/23 revealed the facility will provide and serve meals as ordered and provide adaptive equipment to improve self-feeding skills.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the policy, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for the residents. This directly affected two (#28 and #115) of 62 resident rooms observed. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Observation on 06/03/25 at 8:00 A.M., revealed Resident #115 seated in a recliner in her room. The wall to the left, behind the back of the recliner, and to the left of the window, revealed an area round area approximately seven inches, with exposed plaster and a small pile of plaster dust on the floor below it. Interview with Resident #115, at the time of the observation, stated the wall had been like since her admission. 2. Observation on 06/03/25 at 8:55 A.M., revealed both walls in the small hallway leading into the room of Resident # 28 revealed large areas repaired but unpainted to match the wall coloring. Interview on 06/04/25 at 3:10 P.M., with Maintenance #215 revealed he had just finished repairing the walls, and they need sanded and repainted again. Maintenance #215 stated the walls need repaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication administered was for an appropriate diagnosis. This affected one (#9) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 11/15/11, with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation, bipolar disorder, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, and epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, without status epilepticus. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident #9 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #9 had no mood behaviors, did not have indicators of psychosis, and had no behavioral symptoms. Resident was independent with bed mobility, required set-up assistance with eating, and required substantial assistance with oral hygiene and ambulation. Resident #9 was dependent on staff assistance with toileting hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment was completed accurately to include a diuretic for one (Resident #9) and included falls without injury for one (Resident #40). This affected two (#9 and #40) of five residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 11/15/11, with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation, bipolar disorder, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, and epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, without status epilepticus. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 9 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident used high-risk drug of antipsychotics, antianxiety, antidepressant, and anticonvulsant. There was no diuretic use indicated. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 09/17/24 for Furosemide 20 milligram (mg) give one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was initiated to include contractures. This affected one (#32) of 23 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 03/11/22 with diagnoses of encephalopathy, post traumatic seizures, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. Review of the Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed resident was cognitively impaired. Resident #32 is dependent on staff assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), except resident does not eat. Review of the care plan dated 03/24/22 revealed had an alteration in musculoskeletal status related to fibromyalgia, muscle spasms, and right below the knee amputation with interventions of Resident #32 will remain free from pain or at a level of acceptable discomfort…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, observations and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were provided personal hygiene. This affected two (#26 and #45) residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but not limited to Parkinson's disease, syncope and collapse, pacemaker, bulbous pemphioid, orthostatic hypotension, acute kidney failure, infection and inflammatory reaction of urethral catheter, urinary retention, anxiety disorder, atria fibrillation, bradycardia, depression, hypertension, and neuromuscular dysfunction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #26 revealed an impaired cognition. Resident #26 required set up or clean up assistance for eating, dependent for oral hygiene, dependent for toileting, dependent for shaving, dependent for bed mobility and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the policy, the facility failed to ensure a Resident #46 reviewed for activities of daily living, had a hand splint applied as ordered. The facility further failed to ensure wound assessments were completed for a non pressure sore for Resident #40. This affected two (#40 and #46) of 21 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 09/17/21. Diagnoses include cerebral infarction and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively impaired and had impairment of upper extremities. Review of the physician order dated 09/27/24 revealed to gently open right fingers and place a pillow splint in palm with strap over knuckles. Keep in hand at all times, except during hygiene for contracture…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, nurse practitioner interview, observations and policy review, the facility failed to ensure identified wounds were assessed, measured and documentated on discovery and pressure relieving devices were in place. This affected three (#1, #13, and #49) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #13 revealed an admission on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to heart failure, methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus, local infection of the skin, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, dementia, abnormal weight loss, corns and callosities, peripheral vascular disease, hammer toes, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stress incontinence and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #13 revealed intact cognition. Resident #13 is independent for eating, dependent for toileting, dependent for bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the correct liquid nutritional liquid tube feeding supplement was being administered. This affected one (#32) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 03/11/22 with diagnoses of encephalopathy, post traumatic seizures, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident was cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs), except resident did not eat. Resident used a peg tube for feeding. Review of the care plan dated 03/23/22 revealed resident was tube feeding dependent with interventions to change feed container and tubing every 24 hours and resident was dependent on staff for tube feeding and water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding container was labeled with what solution was being administered. This affected one (#32) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility censes was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 03/11/22 ,with diagnoses of encephalopathy, post traumatic seizures, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, post-traumatic stress disorder, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident was cognitively impaired and was dependent on staff assistance with all activities of daily living (ADLs), except resident did not eat. Resident used a peg tube for feeding. Review of the care plan dated 03/23/22 revealed resident was tube feeding dependent with interventions to change feed container and tubing every 24 hours and resident was dependent on staff for tube feeding and water…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the medical record review, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to address complaints of pain when reported. Additionally, the facility failed to monitor the effectiveness of routine pain medication. This affected one resident (#12) of two residents revealed for pain management. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #12 revealed an admission on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to heart failure, atrial fibrillation, hearing loss, peripheral vascular disease, insomnia, chronic kidney disease, rheumatoid arthritis, dementia, hypertension, osteoarthritis, anxiety disorder, and congestive heart failure. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #12 revealed resident was cognitively intact. Resident had no behaviors. Resident was independent with eating, dependent with toileting, supervision for bed mobility and transfers. Resident #12 received routine pain medication. Resident #12 reported pain in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was followed for dementia treatment when the facility failed ensure medications being used was for dementia and an attempt to reduce the use of psychoactive medication was made. This affected one (#9) of four residents reviewed for dementia care. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 11/15/11, with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation, bipolar disorder, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, and epilepsy, unspecified, not intractable, without status epilepticus. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 03/09/25 revealed had severe cognitive impairment. Resident had no mood behaviors, did not have indicators of psychosis, and had no behavioral symptoms. Resident was independent with bed mobility, required set-up assistance with eating, and required substantial assistance with oral hygiene and ambulation. Resident was dependent on staff assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure antibiotic use was necessary for one (#40) and failed to make recommendations for appropriate medication use for one (#9) This affected two (#9 and #40) of six residents reviewed for medication regimen review. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 11/15/11, with diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with agitation, bipolar disorder, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, and epilepsy. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment reveled resident had severe cognitive impairment, had no behaviors exhibited or listed. Resident was independent with bed mobility, required set-up assistance with eating, required substantial assistance with oral hygiene and ambulation, and was dependent on staff assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, transfers,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure antibiotic use was appropriate after a wound closed. This affected one (#40) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 05/20/20 with diagnoses of inflammatory disease of prostate, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, moderate, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident was cognitively intact. Resident was independent with eating, toileting hygiene, bed mobility, and wheelchair mobility. Resident required set-up assistance with oral hygiene and bathing. Resident required partial assistance with transfers. Resident required substantial assistance with dressing and personal hygiene. Resident did not have a pressure ulcer or a venous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medication record review, observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was below 5%. A total of 34 opportunities were observed with five errors for a error rate of 14.71%. This affected three (#17, #61, and #115) of four residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 05/06/25, with diagnoses of acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, dementia, old myocardial infarction, and essential (primary) hypertension. Review of the physician orders revealed and order dated 05/22/25 for Aspirin Oral Tablet Chewable 81 milligram (mg) give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for old myocardial Infarction. Observation on 06/04/25 at 7:43 A.M. of medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #290 revealed Aspirin Enteric Coated (EC) 81 mg one tablet was administered. Interview on 06/04/25 at 10:17 A.M., with LPN #290 confirmed Resident #17 was administered Aspirin EC 81 mg one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident receiving antibiotics was being tracked and monitored for use. This affected one (#40) of 8 reviewed for infection control. The census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 05/20/20 with diagnoses of inflammatory disease of prostate, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, moderate, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident was cognitively intact. Resident was independent with eating, toileting hygiene, bed mobility, and wheelchair mobility. Resident required set-up assistance with oral hygiene and bathing. Resident required partial assistance with transfers. Resident required substantial assistance with dressing and personal hygiene. Resident did not have a pressure ulcer or a venous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), staff and Detective #40 interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown injury. This affected one (#11) out of three residents reviewed for injuries of unknown origin. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed admission date of 10/24/23. Diagnoses include late onset Alzheimer's, right femoral head fracture, depression, heart failure, and dementia with mood disturbance. Resident #11 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Review of Resident #11's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she required set up for eating and was dependent for toileting hygiene, bed mobility and transfers. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #11 had impaired Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) with the goal to maintain existing ADL self-performance created on 12/07/23. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address the amount of assistance a resident required with activities of daily living (ADL's). This affected one (#11) out of three resident reviewed for ADL assistance. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed admission date of 10/24/23. Diagnoses include late onset Alzheimer's, right femoral head fracture, depression, heart failure, and dementia with mood disturbance. Resident #11 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Review of Resident #11's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she required set up for eating and was dependent for toileting hygiene, bed mobility and transfers. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #11 had impaired Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) with the goal to maintain existing ADL self-performance created on 12/07/23. Further review of Resident #11's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to assess a resident and complete a post fall investigation after a resident experienced a fall. This affected one (#11) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 57. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed admission date of 10/24/23. Diagnoses include late onset Alzheimer's, right femoral head fracture, depression, heart failure, and dementia with mood disturbance. Resident #11 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and did not return to the facility. Review of Resident #11's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she required set up for eating and was dependent for toileting hygiene, bed mobility and transfers. Review of the care plan revealed Resident #11 had impaired Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) with the goal to maintain existing ADL self-performance created on 12/07/23. Further review of Resident #11's care plan revealed there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-09 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and resident, family, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure they had a qualified professional activities director and activities were provided to the residents as scheduled. This affected two residents (#45 and #63) of four residents reviewed for activities. This had the potential to affect all residents except for the 18 residents identified by the facility who usually decline to attend activities. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 04/08/24 with diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, and altered mental status. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the care plan dated 10/10/24 revealed the resident needed assistance/escort for activity functions, preferred activities included reading the bible, church, family and friends, bingo, special events,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to administer medications per physician order. This affected one (Resident #63) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 07/16/24 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, dementia, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #63 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #63's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for September 2024 revealed cyancobalamin 1,000 (Vitamin B12) microgram (mcg) per milliliter (ml) give one ml on the 26th of every month was not given due to medication being available. Levothyroxine (treats thyroid) 25 mcg was not signed off as administered on 09/17/24 and 09/27/24. The MAR for October 2024 revealed Levothyroxine 25 mcg was not signed off as administered on 10/01/24 and 10/02/24. Interview on 10/09/24 at 4:06 P.M. with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered. This affected four (#2, #3, #17, and #25) out of the four residents reviewed for medication administered as ordered. The facility census was 66. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 04/16/21 with medical diagnoses of cerebral infarction with right hemiparesis, dementia, depression, and anxiety. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #2 had moderate cognitive impairment and required substantial staff assistance with bathing, bed mobility, and transfers, and was independent with eating. Review of the medical record for Resident #s revealed physician orders dated 03/07/22 for ferrous sulfate 325 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth two times per day, 12/03/19 for Dilantin 100 mg one capsule by mouth three times per day, 10/30/19 for fish oil…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, medical record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered resulting in two medication errors out of 33 opportunities or six percent (%) medication error rate. This affected two (#2 and #17) out of the three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 66. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 06/06/15 with medical diagnoses of cerebral infarction with left hemiparesis, chronic pain syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and depression. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #17 was cognitively intact and required substantial staff assistance with toilet hygiene, bathing, and bed mobility. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed a physician order dated 07/24/18 for lisinopril 20 milligram (mg) one tablet by mouth daily for blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control guidelines when performing incontinence care. This affected one (#53) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 66. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 12/02/16 with medical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, macular degeneration, peripheral vascular disease, and anxiety. Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #53 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent for toilet hygiene, bed mobility, transfers, eating, and bathing. The MDS indicated Resident #53 was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. Observation on 02/06/24 at 12:51 P.M. revealed Registered Nursing (RN) #108 and Stated Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #106 completed incontinence care for Resident #53. The observation revealed STNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, observation, and review of facility recipes, the facility failed to make pureed food to the correct texture and failed to follow a recipe to make the pureed food. This had the potential to affect six (#5, #15, #20, #24, #38, and #53) residents who have orders for pureed food. Facility census was 75. Finding include: Observation and interview on 10/18/22 at 11:00 A.M. revealed Dietary Staff #73 placed an unmeasured amount of grilled chicken in a blender to make pureed chicken, then seven,four ounce scoops of gravy were added. The food was blended and the remainder of the pot of gravy was poured into the mixture (unmeasured). Dietary staff revealed they put in typically seven to eight chicken breasts to make the required seven pureed meals. The mixture appeared to be thin and smoothie like consistency. Observation and interview on 10/18/22 at 11:07 A.M. revealed Dietary Staff #73 placed four, four ounce scoops of mixed vegetables in the blender, blended the vegetables and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to safety store food items in the refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage areas. This had the potential to affect 74 out of 75 residents residing in the facility, the facility identified one (#52) resident who receives no food from the kitchen. Facility census was 75. Findings include: Observation on 10/17/22 at 11:20 A.M. to 11:40 A.M. revealed the following concerns in the walk in refrigerator: - shredded lettuce left open to air with no date - shredded white cheese left open to air with no date - both containers of cranberry juice were had expired 10/13/22 - unknown pureed food in a styrofoam bowl with no label and no date - butter sticks were left open to air and undated - lunch meat turkey was open to air and undated - hotdog's were left open to air and undated - chunk of meat (appeared like ham) was not labeled or dated Observations in the walk in freezer revealed the following concerns: - pie missing slice and two whole pies were undated - breadsticks undated - slices of bread and rolls undated -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-10-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain covered and clean trash receptacles in the kitchen. This had the potential to affect 74 out of 75 residents residing in the facility, the facility identified one (#52) resident who receives no food from the kitchen. Facility census was 75. Findings include Observation on 10/17/22 at 11:20 A.M. to 11:40 A.M. revealed the kitchen had one blue recycling bin that was overflowing with items piled on top of the lid. Their was a large gray round trash bin with a trash bag that had fallen off the rim down into the trash can with no lid or covering. Four black kitchen trash cans were observed to have no lids or coverings. Interview on 10/17/22 at 11:45 A.M. with Kitchen Manager #42 confirmed trash cans did not have lids. Kitchen manager #42 revealed the lids were thrown out before she started and she was told they were unsanitary. The facility confirmed this had the potential to affect 74 out of 75 residents residing in the facility, the facility identified one (#52) resident who receives no food from the kitchen.
- Potential for harm · F2019-11-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to serve food at a palatable temperatures. This has the potential to affect all 96 residents residing in the facility who are receiving food from the kitchen. The facility census was 96. Findings include: On 11/18/19 at 10:47 A.M. Resident #296 states the food is poor quality, always cold, and the taste is not good. She stated the problem is they don't have a microwaves on this side of the building. Observation of the plating of lunch on 11/20/19 at 11:35 A.M. revealed Dietary Assistant #415 plated food then placed the plate on a tray. Fourteen trays were placed on an open cart for the Sycamore (skilled) Unit. At 11:50 A.M. Chef #406 took the cart from the kitchen to the Sycamore Unit . The cart arrived on the unit at 11:52 A.M. At 11:58 A.M. Resident Assistant (RA) #394 began passing the trays to the residents in their rooms on the unit. At 12:00 P.M. State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #366 began delivering trays from the open cart. At 12:07 P.M. the last tray was delivered to a resident's room. A test…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility records, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections which included a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, and visitors. This had the potential to affect 96 residents of 96 residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the facility IPCP with Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/21/19 at 10:38 A.M. revealed the facility IPCP had not been completed since since 08/24/19. DON verified the last entry on the facility Infection Control Log was dated 08/24/19. DON verified no had completed the IPCP since the previous DON resigned on 09/30/19. The prior DON's last day was 09/25/19. DON stated she thought she would eventually assume the responsibility. DON stated the only…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility records, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) to promote facility-wide monitoring for the appropriate use of antibiotics. This had the potential to affect 96 residents of 96 residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the facility IPCP with Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/21/19 at 10:38 A.M. revealed the facility Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP) had not been completed since since 08/24/19. The IPCP included the ASP. DON verified the last entry on the facility Infection Control Log was dated 08/24/19. DON verified no one had completed the IPCP since the previous DON resigned on 09/30/19. The prior DON's last day was 09/25/19. DON stated she thought she would eventually assume the responsibility. DON stated the only infection information currently being collected was a running list of residents being treated with antibiotics which was not thoroughly completed and had not been reviewed by anyone since the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-11-21 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility self reported incidents (SRI's), review of facility incident reports, observations, staff, resident and physician interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed implement their abuse policy to ensure injuries of unknown origin were immediately reported to the to administrator/designee and to the state agency as required and to ensure injuries of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated. This affected four (#38, #66, #67 and #70) out of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease, right eye blindness, hypertension, cardiac arrhythmia, anemia, hypothyroidism, chronic kidney disease and mental disorders due to known physiological condition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was cognitively impaired. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-11-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility self reported incidents (SRI's), review of facility incident reports, observations, staff, resident and physician interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to immediately report injuries of unknown origin to administrator/designee and to the state agency as required. This affected four (#38, #66, #67 and #70) out of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease, right eye blindness, hypertension, cardiac arrhythmia, anemia, hypothyroidism, chronic kidney disease and mental disorders due to known physiological condition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was cognitively impaired. Review of the nurse progress note dated 10/05/19 at 2:43 A.M. revealed a skin tear three centimeters (cm) long was observed on Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility self reported incidents (SRI's), review of facility incident reports, observations, staff, resident and physician interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown origin. This affected four (#38, #66, #67 and #70) out of four residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease, right eye blindness, hypertension, cardiac arrhythmia, anemia, hypothyroidism, chronic kidney disease and mental disorders due to known physiological condition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #38 was cognitively impaired. Review of the nurse progress note dated 10/05/19 at 2:43 A.M. revealed a skin tear three centimeters (cm) long was observed on Resident #38's left knee. The area was open and unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced fracture of left hip, anemia, peripheral vascular disease, anxiety disorder, Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behavior disturbances, major depressive disorder,and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #65's annual assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident scored a three on the 'Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating she had severe cognitive impairment and exhibited no behaviors. She required supervision of one person physical assistance for bed mobility and toileting. She required extensive assistance of one person for personal hygiene and dressing. She was occasionally incontinent of urine and always continent of bowel. She received an antidepressant all 7 days of the assessment period. used a walker for ambulation. Review of the Care Area Assessment (CAA) stated the resident was at risk for falls based on loss of balance during transitions in position.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, pharmacist and staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the licensed pharmacist reported medication irregularities to the attending physician, medical director and the Director of Nursing. This affected five (#31, #64, #65, #68 and #87) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chest pain, diabetes, cataract, spinal stenosis, nail dystrophy, depression, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, left bundle branch block, hemiplegia, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure and hypertension. Review of the Plan of Care for Resident #31 revealed a focus of psychotropic medication use which included Prozac and Xanax related to depression and anxiety. The goal was Resident #31 will receive the lowest effective dose of psychoactive medication to manage her symptoms. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-21 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide written notification of transfer or discharge to the resident and the resident's representative. This affected two (#90 and #65) out of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included left hip fracture dated 09/15/19, Parkinson's disease, cataracts bilaterally, glaucoma, atrial fibrillation, prostate cancer, hypotension and cardiac pacemaker. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 was discharged , return anticipated on 09/11/19. The Entry MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence Resident #90 was provided information in writing of the reason for his transfer to the emergency room and subsequent admission to the hospital on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-21 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide written notification of the bed hold policy to the resident or resident representative at the time of discharge to the hospital. This affected two (#90 and #65) out of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 96. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #90 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included left hip fracture dated 09/15/19, Parkinson's disease, cataracts bilaterally, glaucoma, atrial fibrillation, prostate cancer, hypotension and cardiac pacemaker. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 was discharged , return anticipated on 09/11/19. The Entry MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #90 returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence Resident #90 and/or his representative were provided information in writing of bed-hold policy at the time of his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed implement a a dietary recommendation and physician order to increase a dietary supplement for a resident with a history of a significant weigh loss. This affected one (#91) out of two residents reviewed for significant weight loss/nutrition. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, contracture of the left knee and bilateral hands, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had short and long term memory loss. She exhibited rejection of care four to six days of the assessment period. She required extensive assistance of one person for eating. She had no swallowing or chewing difficulties. Her weight at the time of the assessment was 124 pounds with no weight loss. Review of an annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident required total assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served under sanitary handling conditions for Resident #122. This affected one (#122) randomly observed resident receiving a hall tray on the Sycamore hall. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Observation on 11/18/19 from 11:52 A.M. to 12:16 P.M. of hall trays being served on the sycamore hall revealed -no issues identified until the last room tray for infection control. Observation on 11/18/19 at 12:12 P.M. of Resident Assistant (RA) #394 passing hall trays on the sycamore hall revealed the RA #394 touched Resident #122's shoulder to awaken the resident. RA #394 assisted Resident #122 by cutting up her food. It was observed RA #394 had a rope type dangling bracelet on her left wrist. It was observed the bracelet was dangling and went into the residents beverage several times as she was cutting up the food. Interview on 11/18/19 at 12:16 P.M. with RA #394 verified after touching her bracelet, the bracelet was wet and had gone into Resident #122's beverage.
- No harm found · C2025-06-11 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Survey Book was updated with current surveys and located in an area visible to residents, visitors. This had the potential to affect all 62 residents in the facility. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Observation on 06/03/25 at 8:49 A.M., revealed the Survey Book was located in a corner, by the entrance to the facility, not visible to residents, visitors, or staff members. The Survey Book contained survey information from December 2020. Survey information was not available in the book for surveys completed on 01/21/21, 03/15/21, 03/17/21, 05/13/21, 05/27/21, 06/28/21, 08/16/21, 10/20/22, 12/15/22, 01/17/23, 07/24/23, 09/05/23, 11/13/23, 02/06/24, 02/15/24, 02/26/24, 10/09/24, 11/18/24, 12/30/24, 01/28/25, and 02/04/25. Interview on 06/03/25 at 8:51 A.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the Survey Book was located in a corner, by the entrance to the facility, not visible to residents, visitors, or staff members. Interview also confirmed the Survey Book for residents, visitors and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-06-11 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure daily nurse staffing was posted daily and readily available for residents and visitors at any given time. This had the potential to affect all 62 residents. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Observation on 06/03/25 at 8:46 A.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed the Nurse Staffing Posting was not posted as required. Interview on 06/30/25 at 8:47 A.M., with the DON confirmed Nurse Staffing is usually posted in the employee breakroom daily. The DON confirmed there was not any Nurse Staffing posted and when posted it is in the employee breakroom, not a prominent area readily accessible to residents, staff, and visitors. Interview on 06/09/25 at 5:00 P.M., with the DON confirmed there is not a policy available for Nurse Staffing posting.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-04 for 7 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHELBY COUNTY OHIO | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 01/01/2012 |
| EHEMANN, JULIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2011 |
| O'NEAL, CURTIS | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/27/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366235. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.