Momentous Health At Sidney

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 51 beds and averages 43.2 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0825 — isolated
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide speech therapy as ordered. This affected two (#129 and #130) of three residents reviewed for therapy services. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #129's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/10/21 with diagnoses including dysphagia, dementia, and rheumatoid arthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #129 had severe cognitive impairment and required supervisory support from staff for eating, positioning, and transferring. He was independently mobile using a manual wheelchair. Review of physician orders revealed Resident #129 was to continue his current speech therapy plan of care under a new provider effective 02/01/26. Review of Speech Therapy Transitional Evaluation and Plan of Treatment revealed Resident #129 was to receive speech therapy services twice weekly for four weeks during the certification period 02/01/26 - 02/28/26. Short-term goals…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of camera footage, review of facility investigation, and review of facility in-services, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced proper infection control practices. This affected one (#01) of three residents reviewed for infection control. This had the potential to affect six additional residents (#04, #08, #11, #21, #29, and #39) identified as being in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #01 revealed an admission date of 12/07/23. Diagnoses include quadriplegia and a history of pressure ulcers to buttocks. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #01 was cognitively intact and dependent on staff for personal hygiene and transfers. Resident #01 was assessed as having an indwelling urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure handwashing or sanitizing was completed between dirty to clean surfaces. This affected six (#39, #5, #23, #41, #28 and #37) out of six residents reviewed for handwashing. The census was 42. Findings included: Observations made on 04/10/25 at 7:42 A.M. during a meal service revealed Activities Director (AD) #63 delivered a breakfast tray to Resident #39 and came out of the room opened the cart and got another tray and went into Resident #5's room and opened the lids for the meal. She went out of the room and got another tray off of the cart and delivered it to Resident # 23's room, left that room and went down the hall to the kitchen to grab a milk for Resident #23. AD #63 proceeded to leave the 100 hall and went down to the 200 hall and proceeded to pass trays to Resident #41 and left the room and went to the cart and got a tray and delivered it to Resident #41 and left the room and went back to the dietary cart and got a tray for Resident #28 and entered the room and touched the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure shaving was completed when the resident had long hairs under her arms and on her legs. This affected one (#39) of one reviewed for dignity and respect. The census was 42. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 10/15/21. Medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and asthma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was set up or clean up assistance for eating, partial assistance/moderate assistance for toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. She was frequently incontinent for the bladder and always incontinent for the bowel. Review of the shower sheet for Resident #39 dated 04/07/25 revealed shaved was checked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure reporting to the state agency was completed when an allegation of abuse was made by a resident. This affected one (#39) of one resident reviewed for reporting an allegation of abuse to the state agency. The census was 42. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 10/15/21. Medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and asthma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was set up or clean up assistance for eating, partial assistance/moderate assistance for toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. She was frequently incontinent for the bladder and always incontinent for the bowel. Review of the progress notes dated 04/01/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure an investigation into an allegation of abuse was completed. This affected one (#39) of one resident reviewed allegation of abuse. The census was 42. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 10/15/21. Medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and asthma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was set up or clean up assistance for eating, partial assistance/moderate assistance for toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. She was frequently incontinent for the bladder and always incontinent for the bowel. Review of the progress notes dated 04/01/25 revealed there wasn't any evidence concerning an abuse allegation. Interview with Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, medical record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident was changed in a timely manner. This affected one (#39) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The census was 42. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 10/15/21. Medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), seizure disorder, anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, and asthma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was set up or clean up assistance for eating, partial assistance/moderate assistance for toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. She was frequently incontinent for the bladder and always incontinent for the bowel. Review of the care plan dated 02/06/25 revealed Resident #39 was at risk for bladder incontinence. Interventions included if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure fluid restriction was followed. The affected one (#33) of three residents reviewed for fluid restriction. The census was 42. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 10/13/20. Medical diagnosis included heart failure, hypertension and diabetes. Review of the physician orders dated 12/03/24 revealed 2,000 ml fluid restriction in a 24-hour period for congested heart failure (CHF). Dietary 1080 ml, (breakfast 480 ml, lunch 360 ml, dinner 240 ml) nursing department 920 ml in a 24-hour period (days 500 ml and nights 420 ml) to be documented every shift. Review of the care plan dated 12/03/24 revealed Resident #33 had a potential for fluid imbalance. Interventions were to provide assistance/encouragement/supervision with fluid intake to meet the daily requirements. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 was moderately…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and food was stored in a safe manner. This had the potential to affect all 38 residents who received food from the kitchen with the exception of one (#05) resident who the facility identified as receiving nothing by mouth from the kitchen. The census was 39. Findings include: Observation on 10/15/24 at 8:37 A.M., during the tour of the kitchen, revealed the ice maker had debris on the outside, top of the ice holding area. Observation inside the ice machine revealed a brownish-red substance was noted above the ice dispensing chute. Observation inside of a small chest freezer, designated to hold residents' private foods, had a moderate amount of ice build-up. The ice extended from the rim to approximately eight inches down and the small inner basket was unable to be moved. The freezer contained five individually wrapped breakfast sandwiches, an opened bag of tater tots, and numerous boxes of various frozen deserts. The food was not dated nor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-17 · tag F0837 — widespread
  Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of the online verification system of the Board of Executives of Long-Term Services and Supports (BELTSS), review of the Administrator job description, staff interview, and facility corrective action, the facility failed to ensure there was a licensed nursing home administrator (LNHA) with a valid license providing supervision and leadership to the facility. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 39 residents. Findings include: Interview on [DATE] at with Administrator #280 confirmed she served as the facility LNHA of record since [DATE]. Administrator #280 confirmed she was notified by a BELTSS representative that her LNHA license expired on [DATE]. Administrator #280 confirmed Administrator #285, who was employed by the facility corporation, served as LNHA for the facility from [DATE] until [DATE]. Administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $219K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH