Springfield Masonic Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 129 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 86 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 79.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.39 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.85 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.48 to 1.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-03-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, interview with dishwasher technician, and review of facility policy, the facility filed to ensure dishwashers reached proper sanitation levels and ensure dietary staff were knowledgeable on checking dishwasher sanitation. This had the potential to affect all 74 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The census was 74.Findings include:Review of dishwasher logs form December 2025, January 2026, and February 2026 revealed wash and rinse temperatures were documented. Wash temperature varied form 140 F to 174 F. Rinse temperatures varied form 120 F to 185 F. Sanitizer levels were not documented on any of the logs.Observation of the dishwasher on 03/02/26 at 8:55 A.M. revealed the wash temperature reached 140 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the rinse temperature reached 115 F. There was a bottle of sodium hypochlorite (bleach) sanitizer on top of the machine with tube running from it into the machine.Interview with Assistant Director of Dining Services (ADDS) #699 on 03/02/26 at 8:857 A.M. revealed the dishwasher was high temperature sanitizing and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure the carpet was in safe and comfortable conditions for the residents. This had the potential to affect the 29 residents who resided on the fourth floor of Rickly Commons. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Observation and interview on 03/03/26 between about 2:45 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. revealed the carpet on the fourth floor of Rickly Commons (RC) had multiple tears in carpet seams. The hallway between rooms RC428 to RC415 and the hallway between rooms RC410 to RC402 had multiple tears in carpet seams. Tears in hallway carpet seams were observed outside doorways to rooms RC402, RC404, RC405, RC408, RC407, RC410, RC420, RC422, RC423, and RC424. Torn carpet seams had bunching of carpet material beneath the handrail by electrical panel, outside room RC416 (biohazard storage room), and outside room RC413. Registered Nurse (RN) #773 confirmed tears in carpet seams were between rooms RC428 to RC415 and the hallway between rooms RC410 to RC402 and outside of rooms RC402, RC404, RC405, RC408, RC407, RC410, RC420,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, review of medical records, and review of facility records, the facility failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) to a resident whose Medicare A benefits were ending. This affected one (Resident #24) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. The facility census was 74.Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #24 was admitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage revealed Medicare Part A Services ended on 12/15/25 for Resident #24. The facility initiated the discharge from Medicare Part A Services when benefit days were not exhausted and Resident #24 remained in the facility. There was no documentation the facility provided the SNF ABN to Resident #24 and/or legal guardian. Interview with Social Services Director (SSD) #692 on 03/05/26 at 11:38…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records, observation, staff interview, laboratory services staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to residents were provided privacy during medical procedures. This affected #7 and #82 of residents observed dining in the memory care units. The facility census was 74.Findings include:1.Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/19/25. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, psychotic disturbance, bipolar disorder, and dementia.Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had moderate cognitive impairment.Observation on 03/06/26 at 7:33 A.M. revealed Laboratory Technician (LT) #800 drawing blood from Resident #7's left arm while he was sitting at a table in the dining room. A female resident was sitting across the table from Resident #7. There were other residents sitting at a table behind Resident #7.Interview with LT #800 on 03/05/26 at 7:36 A.M. confirmed she had obtained a blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and staff interview, facility failed to provide activities of interest and encourage participation to the residents. This affected three (#10, #34, and #78) of three residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 74.Findings include1. Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 12/28/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, diabetes, blindness in one eye, muscle weakness and cerebrovascular disease, vascular dementia, and history of traumatic brain injury. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 had cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers.The undated care plan revealed Resident #78 was dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical and social needs with interventions to introduce the resident to other residents with similar backgrounds, invite residents to scheduled activities, and provide a program of activities…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to accurately assess the resident's wound upon admission. This affected one (#100) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 02/20/26. Diagnoses included left hip fracture, diabetes mellitus, and Alzheimer's disease.Review of the hospital documentation dated 02/17/26 revealed Resident #100 had a unstageable pressure ulcer (slough and/or eschar, known but not stageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough and/or eschar) to coccyx which measured 1.5 centimeters (cm) in length, 2.0 cm in width, and 0.1 cm in depth and a deep tissue injury (purple or maroon area of discolored intact skin due to damage of underlying soft tissue) to right hip which measured 4.0 cm in length, 3.5 cm in width, and 0.1 cm in depth.Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 had severely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials/pen-injectors were dated after opened. This affected two of three medication carts reviewed for medication storage and the facility identified there were six medication carts. This affected two residents (#59 and #105) reviewed for medication storage. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Observation and interview on 03/04/26 at 9:20 A.M. of medication cart two on the 400 Hall revealed Resident #59's Lantus pen-injector (insulin) was opened and did not have a date to indicate when it was opened. Interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #643 confirmed the insulin was in the medication cart, was opened, and did not have a date indicating when it was opened. Observation and interview on 03/04/26 at 9:55 A.M. of medication cart two on 300 hall revealed Resident #105's Toujeo pen-injector (insulin) was opened and did not have a date to indicate when it was opened. Interview with RN #557 confirmed Resident #105's Toujeo was in the medication cart, was opened, and did not have a date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0849 — isolated
  Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to establish a communication system with hospice and ensure the hospice plan of care was readily available for staff to review. This affected one (Resident #78) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The facility census was 74.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 12/28/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, and vascular dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 had cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers.Review of the physician order dated 02/11/26 revealed Resident #78 was admitted to hospice on 02/11/26 for a diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease. Review of hospice communication binder on 03/04/26 revealed it only included the provider names for the hospice medical director, nurse and aide and the off hours contact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, and review of facility policy, the facility ailed to ensure therapy staff followed the physician orders for enhance barrier precautions (EBP) for residents who receive therapies while in the therapy room. This affected one resident (#45) and the facility identified eight residents who were on EBP and receiving therapy services. The facility census was 74. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 02/12/26. Diagnoses included sepsis, multiple myeloma, congestive heart failure, and other bacterial infections. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/19/26, revealed Resident #45 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximum staff assistance with transfers and bed mobility and was dependent upon staff for toilet hygiene and bathing. The physician order dated 02/23/26 revealed an order for EBP. Observation on 03/05/26 at 7:53 A.M. revealed Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) #801…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, medical record review, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the the resident's call system was within the reach of the resident when lying in bed. The affected one (Resident #79) of 20 residents reviewed in the initial pool of the survey process. The facility had a census of 74 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 10/03/24. Diagnoses included vascular dementia, metabolic encephalopathy, and cognitive communication deficit. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #79 had severe cognitive impairment. The care plan dated 01/12/26 revealed Resident #79 was dependent on staff for toileting and personal hygiene, and required substantial assistance from staff to reposition from lying to sitting on side of bed, reposition from sit to stand, and reposition from bed-to-chair transfer. Interventions included to ensure the resident's call light was within reach, encourage…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH