Springfield Nursing & Independent Living
404 E McCreight Ave, Springfield, OH 45503 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (937) 399-8311 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $85,067 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-22)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (79%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.6% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.7% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.0% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 13.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 3.3% | 6.1% | 16.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 44.4% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.4% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.2% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 23.0% | 8.8% | 17.1% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.02 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 58.0 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.81 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 79% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-05-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to reconcile medications following a hospital re-admission. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #210 was admitted to the psychiatric hospital on [DATE] and upon return to the facility on [DATE], the facility failed to continue the psychiatric medications resulting in a change in condition and hospitalization. This affected one (Resident #210) of one resident reviewed for medication reconciliation. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #210 revealed an admission date of 10/06/23. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, anemia, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, heart failure, hypokalemia, and hypothyroidism. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #210 had intact cognition. Resident #210 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-06-04 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed toconsider the views of residents in the decisions impacting the residents' home and lives, failed to discuss significant decisions impacting the residents with the residents, and failed to respond to the resident's concerns and grievances. This affected six (Residents #12, #20, #45, #47, #55, #59) of six residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility census was 61 residents. Findings include: Review of a memo posted on the door of the social services office dated 05/28/26 revealed as part of regional operational standards the facility had made the decision to have the two facility cats removed no later than 06/05/26. Review of a handwritten petition undated titled Save Our Cats revealed it had 35 signatures. Observation on 06/03/26 at 4:00 P.M. revealed Resident #55 expressed sadness and concern to the Administrator, over the plan to get rid of two facility cats. Resident #55 stated she enjoyed the cats and did not want them to be taken away.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the flooring in the common area was clean. This affected the 32 residents who reside on the secured unit. The facility census was 61 residents. Findings include: Observation on 06/01/26 at 11:00 A.M. of the west secured unit near the entrance and outside the dining room revealed the floor had loose dirt, scratch marks, and stains throughout on the entire floor. Interview on 06/01/26 at 11:55 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the floor outside the dining room at entrance to the west unit had dirt and spots on the entire floor. Observation on 06/01/26 at 12:00 P.M. of the west dining room prior to meal service revealed the floor was dirty and had food debris and spills of red liquid throughout the floor. Interview on 06/01/26 at 12:10 P.M. with Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) #305 confirmed the dining room floor to the west unit was dirty and the lunch meal had not been served yet. Review of the facility policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment dated 06/01/26 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for two (Residents #25 and #54) of 17 residents sampled. The facility census was 61 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 08/23/13 with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease, dementia, schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #54 dated 03/20/26 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Observation 06/01/26 at 9:47 A.M. revealed Resident #54 was sitting in the dining room wearing a hospital gown and an incontinence brief with the resident's back and incontinence brief exposed. Interview on 06/01/26 at 9:48 A.M. with Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) #305 confirmed Resident #54 was sitting in the dining room wearing only a hospital gown and a brief and the resident's back and the brief were exposed. Observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and review of the facility policy, the facility to report allegations of misappropriation to the state agency. This affected one (Resident #33) of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 61 residents. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 02/04/16 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, spinal stenosis, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #33 dated 03/20/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the facility SRIs dated 02/01/26 through 06/01/26 revealed there were no SRIs filed for Resident #33. Interview on 06/01/26 at 11:00 A.M. with Resident #33 confirmed he had money in a lock box that was kept in the office of Former Administrator (FA) #500, but when FA #500 left the facility could not find the lock box of money. Interview on 06/04/26 at 8:16 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed in February 2026 Resident #33 stated he had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide proper incontinence care to dependent residents. This affected one (Resident #54) of 17 residents sampled. The facility census was 61 residents. Findings include:Review of medical record for Resident #54 revealed an admission date of 08/23/13 with diagnoses cerebrovascular disease, dementia, schizoaffective disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #54 dated 03/20/26 revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required maximal assistance for toileting and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan for Resident #54 dated 03/23/26 revealed the resident was at risk for altered mood and behaviors related to having diagnoses of schizophrenia, had delusional thoughts, refused medication at times, and kicked and bit staff at times. Interventions included the following: always approach in calm manner, attempt to redirect when resistive to care, if unable to redirect ensure resident was safe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, physician interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per the physician's order. This affected one (Resident #53) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 61 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #53 revealed an admission date of 07/15/11 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #53 revealed an order dated 12/26/25 for Megace oral suspension five milliliters (ml) by mouth once daily to promote weight gain. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #53 dated 05/15/26 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of the Medication Administration Records (MARs) for Resident #53 dated December 2025, January 2026, February 2026, March 2026, April 2026, May 2026, and June 2026 revealed the medication was not administered because it was not available for administration. Interview on 06/01/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a proper manner that prevented misidentification. This affected thirty residents with medications stored on the secured unit. The facility census was 61 residents. Findings include: Observation on [DATE] at 2:52 P.M. of the back medication cart in the behavior unit revealed there were 19 loose, unidentified pills lying on the bottom surface of the top drawer. Interview on [DATE] at 2:52 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #338 confirmed the back medication cart contained 19 loose unidentified pills. Observation on [DATE] at 2:57 P.M. of the front medication cart in the behavior unit revealed there were 26 loose, unidentified pills lying on the bottom surface of the top drawer. The drawer also contained an opened bottle of glucose tablets with 10 tablets remaining with an expiration date of [DATE]. Interview on [DATE] at 2:57 P.M. with RN #338 confirmed front medication cart contained 26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure temperatures were maintained in a safe and comfortable range. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Observation on 01/27/26 from 11:20 A.M. through 11:55 A.M. revealed residents in the East Hall were observed lying in bed with multiple (two or more) blankets on. Staff in the East Hall Nurses Station were observed wearing jackets and hats. Residents in the East TV Room were observed sitting in their wheelchairs and wearing coats. Residents in the [NAME] Hall were observed lying in bed also with multiple blankets. The air temperature felt warmer in the [NAME] Hall than in the East Hall. The dining room was observed with multiple residents eating, wearing sweatpants and hooded sweatshirts. Two random residents were observed wearing coats and hats. Staff were also observed wearing hooded sweatshirts. No observation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to implement an effective pest control program for the eradication of pests and rodents. This had the potential to affect all 58 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 58. Findings include: Observation on 01/28/26 at 8:19 A.M. revealed the facility cat was observed in the facility on the west side of the front desk. The cat was playing with a mouse, swiping at it. Maintenance Technician (MT ) #103 and Maintenance Director (MD) #104 were also observed walking down the same hall when they stopped beside the cat and mouse. The mouse was lying still with the cat right beside it. MT #103 bent down and grabbed the mouse and walked off to dispose of it. MD #104 verified the mouse had been in the facility. Observation on 01/29/26 at 9:20 A.M. revealed a random resident was overheard to say, the cat got another one. The same cat was observed to the east of the front lobby hunched over in a corner and eating a mouse. This was verified with Housekeeping Supervisor #111, who stated she would mop…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-22 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and homelike environment. This had the potential to affect all 63 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Observation on 05/20/25 at 10:45 A.M. of the [NAME] Hall shower room revealed the flooring was peeled up along the walls and a hole in the drywall near the baseboard of the wall near the shower. The observation revealed the drywall was protruding from the wall and some drywall chunks were laying on the floor near the shower entrance. The observation also revealed two ceiling tiles with large circular brownish colored marks. Interview on 05/20/25 at 10:50 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #138 confirmed the shower room on the [NAME] Hall had a hole in the drywall near the shower with drywall protruding from the wall, drywall chunks on the floor, and stained ceiling tiles in the shower. RN #138 stated the shower room has had the issues with drywall broken, a hole in the wall, and stained ceiling tiles for several months. RN #138 stated all the residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 46 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided written notification prior to a room change. This affected one (#10) out of three residents reviewed for room changes. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 03/22/22 with medical diagnoses of cerebral infarction with left hemiplegia, aphasia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, obesity, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease stage III. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #10's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/02/25, indicated Resident #10 had severely impaired cognition, not able to make needs known, and was dependent upon staff for all ADL's including eating. The MDS indicated Resident #10 did not receive any by mouth (PO) intake and received 51%-100% nutrition via…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly and timely investigate allegations of abuse. This affected two (#10 and #46) out of the three reviewed for abuse investigations. The facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 03/22/22 with medical diagnoses of cerebral infarction with left hemiplegia, aphasia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, obesity, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease stage III. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/02/25, indicated Resident #10 had severely impaired cognition, not able to make needs known, and was dependent upon staff for all ADL's including eating. The MDS indicated Resident #10 did not receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, review of the facility Minimum Data Set (MDS) policy, and review of the Long- Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User (RAI) Manual, October 2024, the facility failed to complete significant change MDS as required. This affected one (#10) out of the three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 03/22/22 with medical diagnoses of cerebral infarction with left hemiplegia, aphasia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, obesity, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease stage III. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an annual MDS, dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #10 was cognitively intact and required set-up assistance with eating. The MDS indicated Resident #10 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident blood sugar levels were monitored as ordered. This affected one (#66) out of three residents reviewed for monitoring of blood sugar levels. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 04/09/25 with medical diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and congestive heart failure. Review of the medical record revealed a discharge date of 04/23/25. Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/15/25, which indicated Resident #66 was cognitively intact and required partial/moderate staff assistance with toilet hygiene, showers, supervision with transfers, and was independent with bed mobility. The MDS indicated Resident #66 received hypoglycemic medications. Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed a physician order dated 04/09/25 for Accu-Chek (fingerstick blood sugar monitoring) two times daily, if above 150 give…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, observation, and policy review, the facility failed to properly measure pressure ulcers and ensure treatments were timely initiated for a pressure ulcer. This affected one (#07) out of the three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #07 revealed an admission date of 07/20/24 with medical diagnoses of adult failure to thrive, dementia, right hemiplegia, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #07 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #07 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/28/25, which indicated Resident #07 was cognitively intact and required set-up assistance with eating and substantial/maximum staff assistance with toilet hygiene, showers, bed mobility, and transfers. The MDS did not have documentation to support Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide cares/services to restore eating skills. This affected one (#10) out of three residents reviewed for rehabilitation services. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 03/22/22 with medical diagnoses of cerebral infarction with left hemiplegia, aphasia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, obesity, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease stage III. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #10 was cognitively intact and required set-up assistance with eating. The MDS indicated Resident #10 was dependent upon staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). The MDS indicated Resident #10 received a by mouth intake and no documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to administer medications as ordered resulting in two medication errors out of 27 medication opportunities or a 7.4 percent (%) medication error rate. The affected two (#42 and #53) out of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 63. Findings included: Review of Resident #53's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/13/16. Diagnoses included hypertension, and transient cerebral ischemic attack. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #53 was alert and oriented. Review of plan of care dated 03/17/25 revealed that Resident #53 had diuretic therapy related to having hypertension. Intervention was to administer medication as ordered. Review of physician order dated 12/26/24 revealed that Resident #53 had an order for Verapamil HCL Extended Release 240 milligrams (mg). Review of Resident #42's medical record revealed admission date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to offer or provide Speech/Language Pathology (SLP) services. This affected one (#10) out of the three residents reviewed for rehabilitation services. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 03/22/22 with medical diagnoses of cerebral infarction with left hemiplegia, aphasia, ischemic cardiomyopathy, obesity, congestive heart failure, and chronic kidney disease stage III. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #10 was cognitively intact and required set-up assistance with eating. The MDS indicated Resident #10 was dependent upon staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). The MDS indicated Resident #10 received a by mouth intake and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff interviews, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to follow infection control procedures during wound care and failed to ensure a resident was in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) as required. This affected one (#07) out of three residents reviewed for infection control procedures. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #07 revealed an admission date of 07/20/24 with medical diagnoses of adult failure to thrive, dementia, right hemiplegia, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #07 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical record for Resident #07 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/28/25, which indicated Resident #07 was cognitively intact and required set-up assistance with eating and substantial/maximum staff assistance with toilet hygiene, showers, bed mobility, and transfers. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of the menu, staff and resident interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed and failed to let the residents know the menu changed. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. The census was 61. Findings included: Review of the menu dated 05/19/24 revealed apple pork chop, onion roasted potatoes, dilled carrots, roll, and pumpkin crisp. Observation on 05/19/23 at 11:53 A.M. of the lunch meal revealed the residents were served an apple pork chop, mashed potatoes and gravy, dilled carrots, roll and a brownie. Interview with Dietary Manager DM #546 on 05/19/24 at 12:09 P.M. confirmed there was a menu change and she didn't let the residents know of the change. Dietary Manager #546 stated she didn't have the roasted potatoes or the pumpkin crisp. Dietary Manager #546 revealed she wasn't aware she had to let the residents know when a substitution was going to be made. Observation of her substitution list revealed there wasn't anything for this date. Dietary Manager #546 confirmed all 61…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy reviews, the facility failed to store food properly and maintain a sanitary kitchen. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility, as the facility reported every resident consumed food from the kitchen. The census was 61. Findings include: Observations on 05/19/24 at 8:25 A.M. revealed three white plastic tubs of cereal with white labels marked Cereal with no dates. There was also a gray trash can/bucket in the dry storage area that was filled with a few inches of water. The reach-in freezer had a plastic bag of hamburger patties open with no label or date, vegetarian burgers with no label or date, and a box of hamburger patties open with the inside plastic bag unsealed and no date. The walk-in refrigerator had a box of bacon thawing on the bottom shelf that was open with the inside plastic bag unsealed and a piece of bacon sticking out of the packaging. The ice machine had various red, yellow, and black stains on the inside of the lid and sides of the ice machine. The observations were confirmed by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-22 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) documentation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to have the required members at QAPI meetings. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of QAPI for January 2023, March 2023, June 2023, July 2023, and October 2023 revealed no sign in sheets noted for the meetings. Sign in sheets were located in the March and April 2024 QAPI documentation. No documentation of the medical director attending the meetings in March 2024 or April 2024. Interview on 05/22/24 at 1:27 P.M. with Administrator verified no sign in sheets were located for the QAPI meetings held in 2023. Administrator verified that the medical director did not attend the QAPI meetings in March 2024 and April 2024. Review of the QAPI committee provided by the facility revealed the committee members included but not limited to Administrator, Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Medical Director, and facility interdisciplinary team. Review of policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to have a developed water management plan in place. This had the potential to affect all 61 residents residing in the facility. The census was 61. Findings include: Review of the facility's water management binder revealed no water management plan, including a description and diagram of the water system or control measures to prevent Legionella. Interview on 05/21/24 at 10:05 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed the facility lacked a water management plan. Interview on 05/21/24 at 10:32 A.M. with Maintenance Director #573 revealed they only checked hot water temperatures and had no water management plan to follow. Review of the facility policy titled Legionella Surveillance, dated 01/12/24, revealed Legionella surveillance is one component of the facility's water management plans for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in the facility's water system.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for the residents. This affected three (Residents #18, #21, #31) of three reviewed for homelike environment. This also affected 27 (Residents #56, #21, #07, #19, #110, #18, #05, #08, #55, #54, #25, #50, #22, #28, #43, #41, #45, #02, #210, #26, #44, #06, #37 #01, #03, #10, #51) of 27 residents who resided on the behavioral unit. The census was 61. Findings included: 1. Observation of the activity room for the behavioral unit on 05/19/24 at 2:10 P.M. revealed the seven window ledges were sticky and dusty. The seven window sills in the room were covered with a black substance. The three blinds in the room were covered with a sticky yellow substance. The floor under the two heaters in the room had a thick black substance under them. The baseboards had a black substance on them. There were three lights going down the west hall of the behavioral unit that had light coverings missing and some of the light bulbs were burned out. Also going down…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care conferences were provided quarterly for four (Residents #39, #21, #32, #33) of four reviewed for care conferences. The census was 61. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 11/20/23 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 was cognitively intact. His functional status was set-up or clean-up assistance for eating and toileting. He was independent for bed mobility and transfers. Review of Resident #39's care conference history since 05/01/23 revealed he only had one care conference on 03/28/24. Interview with Resident #39 on 05/19/24 at 10:02 A.M. revealed he didn't know what a care conference was. Interview with the Social Services Designee (SSD) #592 on 05/20/24 at 2:53 P.M. confirmed there was only one care conference for Resident #39. 2. Medical record review for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Review of medical records, late medication reports, physician orders, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in a timely manner and according to physician instruction. This affected four (Residents #13, #30, #31, and #33) of four residents reviewed for late medications. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #13 revealed an admission date of 01/12/15 with diagnoses including but not limited to unspecified convulsions, dementia, mild intellectual disabilities, epilepsy, post-traumatic stress disorder, hypothyroidism, major depressive disorder, cognitive communication disorder, and bipolar disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #13 required supervision/touching assistance for ADLs. Review of the late medication report for 05/18/24, revealed the following medications due at 8:00 A.M. were not administered until 12:00 P.M. levothyroxine 50 mcg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the residents were offered and/or administered the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine. This affected (#32, #110, #58 and #19) of five reviewed for the COVID-19 vaccinations during the annual survey. The census was 61. The facility also failed to ensure staff were offered COVID-19 vaccinations. Findings included: 1. Medical record review for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 01/31/19. Medical diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was cognitively intact. His functional status was set-up or clean-up assistance for eating, toileting, bed mobility and transfers. Review of the medical record from 07/01/23 through 05/19/24 revealed there wasn't any evidence of education, consent or medication administration for COVID-19 vaccination. Interview with Resident #32 on 05/22/24 at 11:08 A.M. revealed he had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated with dignity and respect. This affected one (#1) of one resident reviewed for dignity and respect. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 07/20/12. Diagnoses included unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, bipolar two disorder, schizoaffective disorder, aphasia, post traumatic seizures, other specified intracranial injury without loss of consciousness, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment and was non-verbal. No behaviors were noted on the assessment. Resident #1 was assessed to require setup assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy reviews, the facility failed to develop a care plan for smoking and activities. This affected one (Resident #55) of five residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 06/27/23. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, mild protein-calorie malnutrition, anxiety disorder, myelodysplastic syndrome, heart failure, alcohol dependence with unspecified alcohol-induced disorder, adult failure to thrive, and major depressive disorder recurrent severe with psychotic symptoms. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #55 was assessed to require supervision for bathing, dressing, and personal hygiene, and was independent for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, bed mobility, and transfer. Review of the plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to complete discharge summaries. This affected two (Residents #57 and #59) of two residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 01/12/24 and a discharge date of 05/09/24. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of central portion of right female breast, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, and hypokalemia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #57 was assessed to require setup assistance for eating oral hygiene, and personal hygiene, supervision for toileting, bathing, and dressing, and was independent for bed mobility and transfer. Review of the progress note dated 05/09/24 revealed Resident #57 discharged home. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who couldn't perform Activities of Daily Living (ADL) independently was provided with bathing, beard trimming, and nail trimming, This affected one (Resident #32) of three reviewed for ADL care. The census was 61. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 01/31/19 with a diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was cognitively intact. His functional status was set-up or clean-up assistance for eating, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. Review of the care plan dated 05/01/24 revealed Resident #32 had a self-care deficit for ADLs. He has been supervision for all ADLs but at times required hands on assistance. The resident used a powered wheelchair to move about the facility. He refused showers at times. Review of shower sheets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to assess side rails and/or enabler bars for entrapment risk. This affected one (Resident #33) of two residents reviewed for side rails/enabler bars. The facility census was 61. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission date of 08/26/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to epidural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, major depressive disorder, hypertension, psychosis, type two diabetes, paranoid schizophrenia, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #33 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #33 required extensive assistance for activities of daily living. Review of assessments revealed no side rail and/or enabler bar assessments completed. Observation on 05/21/24 at 1:49 P.M. of enabler bar on Resident #33's bed revealed approximately three and half to four inch gap between the enabler bar and mattress. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolatedRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to assess the use of side rails/enabler bars. This affected two (#33 and #58) of two residents reviewed for side rails/enabler bars. The facility census was 61. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #33 revealed admission date of 08/26/22 with diagnoses including but not limited to epidural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, major depressive disorder, hypertension, psychosis, type two diabetes, paranoid schizophrenia, and dementia with behavioral disturbance. Review of minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE]. Resident #33 had a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of three which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #33 required extensive assistance for activities of daily living. Review of care plan dated 04/24/24 revealed at risk for falls with intervention of mobility bar to right side of bed when in bed to assist with mobility. Review of assessments revealed no side rail and/or enabler bar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, resident and staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident room temperatures were maintained to ensure a comfortable environment for the residents. This affected two (#1 and #3) out of four residents reviewed for comfortable room temperatures. Facility census was 63. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 02/22/21. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, anxiety, hypertension, and acute kidney injury. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #3, dated 11/01/23, revealed the resident had mildly impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care for Resident #3 revealed the resident had potential for altered cardiac status related to hypertension with goal to remain free from complications related to altered cardiac status. Interventions include, but not limited to, monitor for chest pain, blood pressure, nausea and vomiting, shortness of breath,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of personnel files, review of witness statements, and review of the facility's abuse policy, the facility failed to ensure Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI) background checks were completed during the employees hiring process. This affected one resident (#52) of the three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility also failed to ensure their abuse policy was implemented when an allegation of resident abuse was reported. This affected one resident (#52) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 59. Findings Include: 1. Review of the personnel file for Housekeeper #301 revealed she was hired on 01/29/23 and terminated on 08/18/23 for violating the facility's abuse policy due to shouting at a resident. The personnel file revealed no documented evidence of a BCI background check being completed during Housekeeper #301's hiring process. A BCI background check was completed on 08/25/23 which was after Housekeeper #301 had been terminated from employment for violating the facility's abuse policy. Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, review of witness statements, review of the facility's self-reported incidents (SRIs) and review of the facility's abuse policy, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of verbal abuse was reported to the state agency. This affected one resident (#52) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The census was 59. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 06/30/23 and the resident's diagnoses included Schizophrenia. Review the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment 3.0 for Resident #52 dated 07/11/23, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of a progress note dated 08/17/23 for Resident #52, revealed no documented evidence of an argument between Housekeeper #301 and the resident. Review of the SRI's submitted by the facility revealed no documented evidence of an SRI being initiated to the state agency for an allegation of staff to resident abuse on 08/17/23. Review of a witness statement authored by Activities Director (AD) #62 dated 08/18/23, revealed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided correctly. This affected two residents (#11 and #31) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The census was 59. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 01/08/21 with diagnoses of seizures, aphasic, and cerebrovascular attack (stroke). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment 3.0 dated 07/01/23 for Resident #11, revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. The resident required extensive assistance for toileting was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan for Resident #11 dated 07/09/23 revealed the resident exhibited episodes of incontinence for bowel and bladder due to impaired cognition. Observation of incontinence care provided by State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #124 for Resident #11 on 09/27/23 at 2:36 P.M. revealed STNA #124 stood the resident up in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, chemical supply technician interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain equipment and store food and supplies in a manner to prevent the potential spread of food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/23/22 at 8:25 A.M. revealed a large standing fan in the kitchen, coated in a dark grey furry substance, facing the tray line, and in the on position. Staff were observed preparing breakfast trays from the tray line. Interview on 05/23/22 at 8:29 A.M., [NAME] #22 verified the fan was dirty, on, and facing the food on the tray line. 2. Observation on 05/25/22 at 9:07 A.M. revealed a large standing fan, in the on position, facing the three-compartment sink and clean, drying dishes. The fan was observed to be coated in a grey, furry substance. Interview at the time of the observation with Food Service Supervisor (FSS) #21 verified the fan was dirty, on, and facing clean dishes. 3. Observation on 05/23/22 at 8:31 A.M. revealed four milk crates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-05-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were placed in appropriate transmission based precautions upon admission. This had the potential to affect 32 residents (#01, #03, #04, #05, #07, #10, #13, #15, #16, #18, #21, #24, #25, #26, #29, #31, #32, #37, #38, #39, #44, #45, #46, #49, #50, #51, #54, #58, #60, #463, #464, and #465) residing on the East Unit. In addition the facility failed to ensure medications were not handled with bare hands prior to administration. This affected two residents (#42 and #50) of three residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 60. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified anemia, major depressive disorder, unspecified acute kidney failure, and unspecified cerebral infarction. Review of most recent Minimum Daily Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #58 had moderately…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure female residents did not have facial hair. This affected one resident (#36) of eight female residents (#42, #36, #33, #08, #41, #35, #56 and #06) observed on the memory care unit. The facility census was 60. Findings included: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/16/11. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, extrapyramidal and movement disorder, diabetes, chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Review of Resident #36's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) was unable to be completed. The MDS revealed the resident required extensive one-person assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, personal hygiene, and toilet use. Review of Resident #36's plan of care revealed the resident had a self-care deficit related to cognitive impairment and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure the call light was within easy reach of residents. This affected one resident (#24) of 24 residents reviewed. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #24 revealed admission date of 05/11/21. Diagnoses included stroke, hemiparesis and hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, flaccid hemiplegia left non dominant side and type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. The comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #24 required extensive two-person assistance for bed mobility, extensive one person assistance for eating, toilet use, personal hygiene and total dependence for transfers. A care plan for self-care deficit related to right and flaccid hemiplegia requiring assistance. Interventions included the need to evaluate for adaptive equipment. Observation on 05/23/22 at 11:18 A.M., revealed Resident #24's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's code status was accurately documented in the resident's record. This affected one resident (#49) out of 24 residents reviewed for code status. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, malignant neoplasm of unspecified site of unspecified female breast, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, glaucoma, and insomnia. Review of Resident #49's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and Resident #49 required supervision with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Resident #49 required limited assistance with dressing and Resident #49 also required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record of Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 01/02/19. The resident transferred to another facility on 04/01/22 and returned to the facility, following a hospital stay, on 04/12/22. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, anxiety, major depressive disorder, essential hypertension, epilepsy, osteoarthritis, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, polyneuropathy, schizoaffective disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbance, type two diabetes mellitus, and chronic atrial fibrillation. Review of the comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was not assessed. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for bed mobility and toilet use, and was totally dependent on two staff for transfers. The resident was independent after setup for eating. The resident was assessed as having no dental problems, including no broken natural teeth. Review of the Dental Summary Report dated 07/21/21 revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed notify the state mental health authority with a significant change pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) for a resident with a change in their mental health condition. This affected one resident (#49) out of two residents reviewed for significant change PASARR. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, malignant neoplasm of unspecified site of unspecified female breast, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, schizoaffective disorder, glaucoma, and insomnia. Review of Resident #49's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and Resident #49 required supervision with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Resident #49 required limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of the manufacturers installation recommendations, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident had a care plan for assist bars. This affected one resident (#15) out of 15 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, constipation, insomnia, edema, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of Resident #15's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and Resident #15 was independent with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, and toilet use. Resident #15 required supervision with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #15's undated care plan revealed Resident #15 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for dental and safety interventions. This affected two residents (#11 and #16) out of 15 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 60. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 04/19/16. Diagnoses included alcohol dependence with alcohol-induced persisting dementia, major depressive disorder, schizoaffective disorder, dementia with behavioral disturbance, hyperlipidemia, bipolar disorder, constipation, cognitive communication deficit, essential hypertension, and benign prostatic hyperplasia. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Resident #11 had impaired cognition. The resident was assessed as not having any behaviors during the assessment period. The resident required supervision for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use, and was independent with eating. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a physician ordered fall preventions were implemented. This affected one resident (#36) of 15 residents reviewed during the annual recertification. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/16/11. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, extrapyramidal and movement disorder, diabetes, chronic kidney disease and hypertension. Review of Resident #36's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) was unable to be completed. The MDS revealed the resident required extensive one-person assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, personal hygiene, and toilet use. The resident was independent with set-up for eating. Review of Resident #36's plan of care dated 01/06/22 revealed the resident was at risk for falls related to weakness and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-26 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of manufacturers instructions, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's assist bars were installed per manufacture instructions. This affected one resident (#15) out of 15 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 60. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, constipation, insomnia, edema, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of Resident #15's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and Resident #15 was independent with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, and toilet use. Resident #15 required supervision with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #15's undated care plan revealed Resident #15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the facility in a clean manner and in good repair. This had the potential to affect 38 of 38 residents who reside in the [NAME] Wing. The total facility census was 76. Findings include: Observations on 07/22/19 at 10:45 A.M. in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed a window that was missing blinds and the parking lot was visible through the window. During an interview on 07/24/19 at 01:46 P.M., with Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #21, verified room [ROOM NUMBER]'s window was missing blinds. Observation on 07/22/19 at 11:08 A.M. in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the closet door was off the tracks and very difficult to move. During an interview on 07/24/19 at 01:48 P.M. with MS #21, verified room [ROOM NUMBER]'s closet door was off the track and very difficult to move. Observation on 07/22/19 at 11:35 A.M., revealed the activity room mini-refrigerator had a strong odor, had a dried substance covering the bottom, and a spoiled mighty shake and apple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a call light within reach for one resident. This affected one (#58) of 18 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The total facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the record for Resident #58 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, dysphagia, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #58's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed he had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed he required set-up assistance with bed mobility, extensive assistance with transfers, toilet use and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #58's care plan dated 01/29/19, revealed Resident #58 was at risk for falls and staff should maintain his call light within reach. Observations on 07/24/19 at 10:27 A.M., revealed Resident #58 was sleeping in bed with his call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-25 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the closed records, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer for one resident. This affected one (#84) of three closed records reviewed for written transfer notices. The total facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the record for Resident #84 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, bipolar disorder, psychosis, major depressive disorder, insomnia, and schizoaffective disorder. Resident #84 discharged on 06/22/19, to a mental health hospital related to aggressive behaviors. Review of the form titled, Letters of Guardianship, dated 01/26/19, revealed Resident #87 was incompetent and had a legal guardian appointed for an indefinite time period. Review of a nursing note dated 06/22/19, revealed Resident #87 was exhibiting aggressive behaviors including attempting to flip a dining room table and pushing chairs into staff. Law enforcement was called to take Resident #87 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one residents care plan had been reviewed and revised to meet the needs of the resident. This affected one (#58) of 18 residents reviewed for updated care plans. The total facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #58's record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, dysphagia, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #58's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed he had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed he required set-up assistance with bed mobility, extensive assistance with transfers, toilet use and personal hygiene. Resident #58's care plan dated 01/29/19, revealed he was on 15 minute checks for 72 hours, was an extensive assist for bed mobility, and was at risk for nutrition/hydration related to a history of refusing his dietary supplement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL's) care was provided for one resident. This affected one (#18) of 19 residents reviewed for ADL's care. The total facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of Resident #18's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included diverticulitis, gastrostomy status, gastro-esophageal disease, and dysphagia. Resident #18's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #18 was severely cognitively impaired and totally dependent on staff for all ADL's. Observation on 07/23/19 at 08:28 A.M., revealed a strong foul odor in Resident #18's room. The observation also revealed brown emesis that had dried onto his beard, a wash-cloth that had been placed under his chin, and was also dried onto his hospital gown and bed sheet. Interview on 07/23/19 at 8:30 A.M. with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #71, revealed Resident #18 was totally dependent on staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-07-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were reviewed and addressed for two residents. This affected two (#24 and #41) of six residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations. The total facility census was 76. Findings include: 1. Review of the record for Resident #24 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, insomnia, dementia without behavioral disturbance, major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis. Review of Resident #24's care plan revealed Resident #24 was on psychotropic medications including an anti-depressant, hypnotic, and a mood stabilizer to manage symptoms of psychosis, depression, and insomnia. The care plan indicated the physician should review the medications for ongoing need and the pharmacy should review the medications per facility policy. Review of a pharmacy consultation report dated 11/20/18, revealed Resident #24 was receiving Fluoxetine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-05-22 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure daily nursing staffing information was posted as required. This had the potential to affect all 63 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Observation on 05/14/25 at 12:45 P.M. revealed the daily nursing staffing posted at the front receptionist desk was dated 05/12/25. Observation on 05/15/25 at 8:10 A.M. revealed the daily nursing staffing posted at the front receptionist desk was dated 05/12/25. Interview on 05/15/25 at 8:14 A.M. with Receptionist #120 confirmed the daily nursing staffing posted on the receptionist desk was dated 05/12/25. Observation on 05/20/25 at 7:58 A.M. revealed the daily nursing staffing posted at the front receptionist desk was dated 05/12/25. Interview on 05/20/25 at 8:00 A.M. with Director of Nursing confirmed the daily nursing staffing posted was dated 05/12/25. This deficiency was an incidental finding discovered during the course of the complaint investigation.
- No harm found · C2024-05-22 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel records and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the activity department was overseen by a qualified activity professional. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The census was 61. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Activity Director #502 revealed they were hired on 03/15/23 and promoted to Activity Director on 06/12/23. Further review of the personnel file for Activity Director #502 revealed no certification or employment experience that qualified them to oversee the activity department. Interview on 05/21/24 at 10:46 A.M. with Activity Director #502 revealed they were currently enrolled in a course to become a certified activity professional. Interview on 05/21/24 at 5:20 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed Activity Director #502 was not certified and had no previous employment experience to oversee the activity department.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$85,067 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $85,067 — penalty dated 2024-05-22
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-20 for 40 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $741K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366099. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-05-22, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.