Carriage Inn Of Steubenville

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 177 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 64.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 100 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 99.1 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.81 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.70 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.71 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.89 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, manufacturer guideline review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #7 was comprehensively assessed and appropriate interventions were in place to prevent a burn from a hot liquid. In addition, the facility failed to ensure care planned/physician ordered fall interventions were in place to decrease the resident's risk of falls. This affected one resident (#7) of four residents reviewed for accidents. The census was 78. Actual Harm occurred on 09/19/2025 when Resident #7, who had severe cognitive impairment, required staff assistance with activities of daily living and received occupational therapy for identified upper extremity weakness, sustained large second degree burns to her left thigh requiring pain medication and treatments to the areas after the resident was provided hot tea in a Styrofoam cup that spilled on her lap. Findings include: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, maintenance ticket reviews, and staff interviews the facility failed to maintain safe flooring when it did not repair an area of flooring that was uneven and cracked on the transition care unit (TCU) utilized by residents. This affected nine mobile residents (#1, #9, #13, #25, #34, #42, #62, #95, and #105) of 20 residents residing on TCU. The facility census was 95.Findings include:Observation on 03/30/26 at 7:35 AM during the initial tour of the transition care unit (TCU) in front of the nurses' station door revealed a dip in the flooring and a piece of the flooring cracked with a hole starting. This was verified by certified nursing assistant (CNA) #481 who reported she would fill out a ticket to let the maintenance department know of concern. CNA #481 confirmed that the dip in the floor and crack have been there for a while. Observation and interview on 04/02/26 at 9:32 A.M. during a return tour of the TCU in front of the nurses' station door revealed a dip in the flooring and a piece of the flooring cracked with a hole starting. This was verified again by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview and observation, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a call light was accessible and within reach to meet resident needs. This affected one resident (#95) of 20 residents residing on the transitional care unit. The facility census was 95.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #95 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis (a whole-body infection), venous ulcers to bilateral lower legs, severe peripheral vascular disease (narrowing of the vessels in the arms and legs decreasing blood circulation), diabetes, heart failure, heart disease, and acute kidney failure. Further review of the medical record for Resident #95 revealed a minimum data set (MDS) comprehensive assessment was completed on 03/25/26 and revealed Resident #95 required supervision and hands on assistance with dressing lower body, supervision with transfers from bed to wheelchair, and was dependent on staff for mobility of his…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis was indicated for the use of an antipsychotic medication. This affected one resident (#2) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, non-Alzheimer's disease, unspecified fracture of right lower leg, osteomyelitis of right ankle and foot, diabetes mellitus, cirrhosis of liver, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and muscle wasting. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/01/25, revealed Resident #2 had severe cognitive impairment, a diagnosis of non-Alzheimer's dementia, and received an antipsychotic medication. Review of the physician order, dated 10/02/25, revealed the order for Risperdal (antipsychotic medication) oral tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth two times a day for agitation. Review of the Monthly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of medical records and facility policy, observation of medication administration, and staff interviews the facility failed to properly administer medications through a feeding tube for Resident #8. This affected one resident (#8) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding management and care. The facility census was 95.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including high blood pressure, paraplegia (unable to use lower legs), aphasia (inability to speak), seizure disorder, depression, gastrotomy tube (for tube feeding and medications), and anoxic brain damage (lack of oxygen to brain leading to death of brain cells). Further review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed a quarterly assessment of the minimum data set (MDS) completed on 02/13/26. The MDS revealed Resident #8 was unable to speak and communicate needs, was dependent for all cares and mobility, and was unable to complete an evaluation for mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide effective and timely pain control for Resident #104 upon admission. This affected one resident (#104) of one resident who was reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 95.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #104 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease with a triple vessel cardiac bypass, anemia (low blood count), depression, high blood pressure, spinal stenosis (narrowing of the vertebrae) of the neck and mid back, bilateral hip replacements, left knee replacement, and uterine cancer with radiation.Review of the hospital active medication list sent on 03/26/26 to the facility revealed Resident #104 was actively prescribed the following medication during hospitalization: Oxycodone (a potent opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) five (5) milligrams (mg) every four hours as needed for post op(erative) pain,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure safe storage of medication when medications were left on the breakfast tray for Resident #95. This affected one resident (#95) of twenty residents receiving medication on the transitional care unit. The facility census was 95. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #95 revealed admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis (a whole-body infection), venous ulcers to bilateral lower legs, severe peripheral vascular disease (narrowing of the vessels in the arms and legs decreasing blood circulation), diabetes, heart failure, heart disease, and acute kidney failure. Further review of the medical record for Resident #95 revealed a minimum data set (MDS) comprehensive assessment was completed on 03/25/26 and revealed Resident #95 required supervision and hands on assistance with dressing lower body, supervision with transfers from bed to wheelchair, and was dependent on staff for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure the lunch menu and spreadsheets were followed as written. This affected 13 residents (#1, #5, #9, #10, #17, #33, #40, #59, #68, #73, #86, #98 and #100) of 88 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#83) who did not eat by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 102. Findings include:1a. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed an admission date of 11/12/18. Pertinent diagnoses included morbid (severe) obesity, type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder. The physician had ordered on 01/16/24 for the resident to receive a reduced concentrated sweets (RCS), regular texture with regular/thin liquids with additional instructions to give fruit for dessert, skim milk per menu, and no bread at lunch and dinner unless a sandwich per menu or requested.Further review of Resident #9's medical record revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/09/26, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-10-23 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident at risk for dehydration had water maintained at her bedside. This affected one (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for dehydration. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with a late onset, unspecified dementia, adult onset diabetes mellitus, personal history of malignant neoplasm of the pancreas, malignant neoplasm of an unspecified part of an unspecified bronchus/ lung with metastasis to the brain, chronic kidney disease, unsteadiness on feet, and a history of falls. Review of Resident #7's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident did not have any communication issues and her cognition was severely impaired. She was not indicated to have displayed any behaviors and was not known to reject care. She required a partial to moderate assist with transfers and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an effective antibiotic stewardship program was implemented, when a resident returned from the hospital on an antibiotic for the treatment of a urinary tract infection, and the facility's infection preventionist failed to ensure an appropriate antibiotic was ordered to adequately treat the infection. This affected one (Resident #7) of three resident's reviewed. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease with late onset, unspecified dementia, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #7's nurses' progress notes revealed the resident was sent to the emergency room (ER) on 08/26/25 at 5:00 P.M. for complaints of chest pain. She complained of mid-sternum burning and heaviness. She returned to the facility on [DATE] at 1:40 A.M. with the diagnoses of a urinary tract infection (UTI). She returned to the facility with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of maintenance work orders the facility failed to maintain a safe and comfortable home like environment. This had the potential to affect one (Resident #07) of five residents rooms observed. the census was 78. Observation on 10/15/25 at 10:02 A.M. revealed a hole in the wall behind the head of Resident #7's bed. The hole was observed to be located behind the head of the resident's bed, near the baseboard. The hole was approximately eight inches by eight inches.Review of facility maintenance work orders for the past six months revealed no documentation of an order to repair the hole in the wall of Resident #7's room.Interview on 10/15/25 at 10:48 A.M. with Certified Nurses Assistant (CNA) #42 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #18 confirmed there was a larger hole in the wall of Resident #7's room. The hole was located behind the head board near the bottom of the wall. CNA #42 and LPN #18 stated they had not noticed the hole in the wall prior to it being pointed out. This deficiency demonstrates non-compliance investigated under Complaint…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH