Steubenville Country Club Manor
575 Lovers Lane, Steubenville, OH 43953 · For profit - Corporation · 54 certified beds · (740) 266-6118 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.1% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.0% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.7% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.4% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 34.7% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 68.2% | 94.5% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 3.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.2% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.1% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 5.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 34.8% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.7% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.0% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.43 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.09 | 1.80 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 25.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.5%CMS range 32.0–61.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.9%CMS range 7.3–15.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 25.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 16.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 20.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 96.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 4.0–12.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 50.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
61 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, review of information from diabetes.org and interview the facility failed to adequately monitor Resident #40 related to the administration of diabetic medication. Actual harm occurred on 07/22/23 when Resident #40 was found by staff with a change in mental status/condition after oral hypoglycemic medications had been adjusted and no routine blood glucose monitoring was ordered/completed. Resident #40 was emergently transferred to the hospital and subsequently admitted with a diagnosis of hypoglycemia (low blood glucose/sugar level). This affected one resident (#40) of three residents reviewed for blood glucose monitoring. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/19/23 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (long term) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2019-11-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide one resident (Resident #11) adequate assistance during a wheelchair transport to prevent a fall with major injury. Actual Harm occurred on 08/06/19 when Resident #11, who required extensive assistance from staff for wheelchair transportation, sustained a fall from her wheelchair when her nightgown got caught in the wheel of the wheelchair causing the resident to fall from the wheelchair landing on her face and sustaining an orbital (facial) fracture. This affected one resident (Resident #11) of two reviewed for accidents. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, venous insufficiency, insomnia, Parkinson's disease and endocarditis. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 had intact cognition, required extensive assist of one staff member…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were accurate and consistently recorded in the record. This affected one Resident (Resident #30) of one reviewed for advanced directives. The census was 42. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed they were was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included Alzheimer's Disease, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and malignant melanoma of the skin. Review of Resident #30's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 dated 11/26/24 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. They required setup or clean up assistance for eating, supervision or touching assistance for oral hygiene, substantial to maximal assistance with toileting hygiene, dressing, personal hygiene, and bed mobility. Finally, the resident was dependent on staff for showers. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed accurately upon admission to the facility. This affected one (Resident #8) of one residents reviewed for PASRR assessments. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/08/24 with diagnosis that included diabetes mellitus, adjust disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, bipolar disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Review of the PASRR completed on 11/08/24 indicated Resident #8 had diagnosis of mood disorder and panic or other severe anxiety disorders. No evidence of bipolar disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder was indicated. On 02/1125 at 3:30 P.M. interview with Admissions Coordinator #59 verified Resident #8's PASRR did not include all current mental health diagnosis including bipolar disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure resident blood pressures were monitored prior to administration of hypotensive medications and according to physician's medication order parameters. This affected one (Resident #99) of five residents reviewed for medication use. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of Resident #99's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/20/25 with diagnoses that included history of falls with subdural hematoma and craniotomy, cerebrovascular accident, hypotension and hypertension. Further review of the medical record revealed a physician's order on 01/28/25 for the use of midodrine (anti-hypotensive medication) 10 milligrams (mg) three times daily with parameters to hold if systolic blood pressure is greater or equal to 150 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #99 revealed the medication administered as ordered with no evidence of blood pressure monitoring as indicated. On 02/12/25 at 1:40 P.M. interview with the Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents medical record were complete and accurate related to documentation of care provided. This affected two residents (Resident #8 and #28) out of two residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 42. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 07/24/23. Diagnosis included malignant neoplasm of upper lobe, left bronchus or lung, obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, arteriosclerotic heart disease, dependence on supplemental oxygen, pulmonary edema, hypertension, malignant neoplasm of right breast, and uterine cancer. Review of Resident #28's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Resident #28 required setup and clean up assistance with eating, oral hygiene, supervision or touching assistance for toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, and bed mobility. They required partial to moderate assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an assessment for proper indication of antibiotic use was completed prior to utilizing antibiotic medications. The affected three (Residents #7, #8 and #10) of five residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 42. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/09/23 with diagnosis that included Alzheimer's disease, tracheostomy and fibromyalgia. Further review of the medical record including physician's orders revealed the use of the following antibiotics:: 09/07/24, doxycycline (antibiotic)100 milligrams (mg) twice daily for nine days for a wound infection; 08/27/24, Bactrim DS (antibiotic) 800-160 mg twice daily for 10 days for cellulitis; 03/19/24, cephalexin (antibiotic) 500 mg four times daily for infection, no indication was found for use of the medication; 02/19/24, ciprofloxacin (antibiotic) 500 mg twice daily for 10 days for infectious sputum. Further review of the medical record revealed no evidence of any assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered influenza and pneumococcal vaccines after admission to the facility. This affected one (Resident #8) of five residents reviewed for vaccines. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/08/24 with diagnosis that included diabetes mellitus, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, bipolar disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Further review of the medical record including immunization revealed no evidence of any vaccines administered including influenza or pneumococcal. No evidence of any declination was found within the medical record. On 02/13/25 at 10:45 A.M. interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #72 indicated the facility policy was to offer vaccines to residents annually and did not indicate anything related to new admission residents after the facility's annual vaccine clinic. LPN #72 verified Resident #8 was not reviewed or offered influenza or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered COVID-19 vaccines after admission to the facility. This affected one (Resident #8) of five residents reviewed for vaccines. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/08/24 with diagnosis that included diabetes mellitus, adjust disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, bipolar disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. Further review of the medical record including immunization revealed no evidence of any vaccines administered including COVID-19. No evidence of any declination was found within the medical record. Review of the undated facility policy titled Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Vaccination of Residents and Staff revealed no evidence of instructions regarding offering and/or reviewing of vaccines following admission to the facility. On 02/13/25 at 10:45 A.M. interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #72 indicated the facility policy was to offer vaccines to residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and review of the daily posting it was determined the facility failed to ensure accomodation of resident needs to ensure resident's call lights were answered timely. This affected four residents (#3, #9, #20, and #40) of 41 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: Review of the daily posting dated 10/02/24 revealed the census was 41. There was one Registered Nurse (RN), two Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN), and seven State Tested Nurses' Aides (STNA) to provide direct care to the 41 residents residing in the facility. Observation on 10/02/24 at 7:31 A.M. of call lights revealed Resident #9's call light had been activated prior to the surveyor entering the unit. The call light was activated until 7:39 A.M. when a staff member answered the light. Staff were observed walking by the call light and a housekeeping staff was observed in the hallway during the eight-minute observation and no one answered Resident #9's call light. Observation on 10/02/24 at 8:00 A.M., revealed Resident #20's call light was activated. The call light was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of shower schedule, and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident dependent on staff for bathing had bath preference honored. This affected three residents (#9, #22, and #43) of three records reviewed. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, paraplegia, pressure ulcer to heels and sacrum, chronic kidney disease, heart disease, chronic pain, colostomy, gastrostomy, and urinary catheter. Review of the shower sheet (undated) revealed Resident #9's shower days were Tuesday and Thursday. Review of Resident #9's bath task dated [DATE] to [DATE] revealed no evidence the resident received a shower. Interview on [DATE] at 8:23 A.M., with Resident #9 revealed she just returned to the facility on [DATE] after being hospitalized for two months. The resident reported she has never had a shower since she was originally admitted to the facility, however…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-30 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — widespreadEnsure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of personnel files and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing assistants received required training prior to providing direct care to residents. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents. Findings include: 1. On [DATE] at 11::15 A.M., Employee #145 (who introduced herself as a nurse aide in training) stated she had not yet started nurse aide training classes. Employee #145 stated she had worked in a group home in the past. Employee #145 stated she had four 12 hours days of orientation with another aide. Employee #145 indicated her duties included helping with meals, providing showers, and providing incontinence care. Employee #145 stated she was performing all the same duties as state tested nursing assistants. Employee #145 stated she had never received dementia training or how to deal with aggressive behaviors. During orientation she received information about specific residents and their behaviors and preferences. On [DATE] at 1:26 P.M., Human Resource (HR) employee #150…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 49 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and investigation, the facility failed to ensure administrative staff maintained records in a secure and accessible area and failed to ensure incidents of elopement were investigated and evaluated to ensure safety of wandering residents. This affected all 46 residents. Findings include: 1. During an entrance conference with the Administrator on 05/16/24 at 12:51 P.M., a request was made for infection control surveillance logs for the past three months. On 05/16/24 at 4:50 P.M., the Administrator stated he could not locate evidence of infection control logs since February 2024. The prior Director of Nursing (DON)/Registered Nurse (RN) #200 kept the information on her personal ipad and her employment had ended on 05/15/24 and no records were available. On 05/21/24 at 9:15 A.M., RN #100 stated she was able to locate some infection control paper work through February 2024 but could find nothing since then. RN #100 stated she had been unable to find any information that showed an evaluation of the infection data and never recalled RN #200 discussing evaluations of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide evidence of infection control surveillance and failed to implement proper hand hygiene and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during care of a feeding tube. This affected Residents #3 and #22 and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. During an entrance conference with the Administrator on 05/16/24 at 12:51 P.M., a request was made for infection control surveillance logs for the past three months. On 05/16/24 at 4:50 P.M., the Administrator stated he could not locate evidence of infection control logs since February 2024. Registered Nurse (RN) #200 kept the information on her personal ipad and her employment had ended on 05/15/24 and no records were available. On 05/20/24 at 8:04 A.M., RN #100 stated since the facility had been unable to locate infection control logs/surveillance she had calls out to the pharmacy to get antibiotic reports and was looking at orders in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-30 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of infection surveillance records and interview, the facility failed to ensure a minimum of one individual was qualified to perform the job of an infection preventionist. This had the potential to affect all 46 residents. Findings include: During the entrance conference with the Administrator on 05/16/24 at 12:51 P.M., he reported the Director of Nursing (DON) who had also been assigned as the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP) had a last day of employment at the facility on 05/15/24. On 05/21/24 at 9:15 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #100 verified the facility had no other staff member who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control to serve as the IP.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services, according to program instruction, to maintain residents' range of motion for four (Residents #2, #9, #10 and #42) of four residents reviewed for range of motion. The facility identified 11 residents on restorative programs for range of motion. The facility census was 46. 1. Review of Resident #10's medical records revealed diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, malignant neoplasm of the glottis (center of the larynx (voice box) ), chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, heart disease, and macular degeneration. Review of a care plan initiated 02/05/24 revealed Resident #10 was on a restorative nursing program (RNP). Interventions included documenting participation in RNP, report to nursing complaints of pain during restorative active range of motion (AROM) programs and the registered nurse (RN) was to review compliance of and effectiveness of RNP. Review of restorative task revealed a program for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of pharmacy recommendations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were acted upon timely. This affected four (Residents #10, #13, #34, and #40) of five residents reviewed for medication use. The facility census was 46. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting the right dominant side, rhabdomyolysis (condition in which damaged skeletal muscle breaks down rapidly, contracture of the right hand, heart failure, benign prostatic hyperplasia (a condition in which the flow of urine is blocked due to the enlargement of prostate gland)., gastroesophageal reflux disease, stiffness of the right shoulder, speech disturbance, acquired absence of the spleen, history of falling, hypertension, and muscle wasting. Review or a medication regimen review dated 03/13/24 revealed a diagnosis was needed to support the use of risperidal (an antipsychotic medication). The physician response was blank. A physician order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and review of Medscape online information regarding humalog insulin storage the facility failed to ensure the proper labeling and storage of medications. This affected five residents (Resident #1, #21, #33, #45 and #48) of 46 residents with medications secured in the two facility identified medication carts. Findings include. 1. While observing the 100/200 hall medication cart with Registered Nurse (RN) #135 on 05/16/24 at 1:38 P.M., Resident #21 had two bottles of opened humalog insulin. The insulin was not dated as to when it was opened. RN #135 stated the insulin vials were transferred with Resident #21 from another facility upon admission so she did not know how long they had been opened. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Medscape information on humalog insulin revealed open vials could be stored/used for up to 28 days after opening the vial. 2. While observing the 100/200 hall medication cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy and completeness of medical records. This affected three known residents (Resident #13, 18, and #47) but had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The census was 46. Findings include: 1. a Review of Resident #18's open medical record revealed diagnoses including dementia with agitation, type two diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, muscle wasting, anxiety disorder, long term use of insulin, vitamin B12 deficiency, and acute angle-closure glaucoma in bilateral eyes. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #18 was moderately cognitively impaired with a score of 9 out of a possible score of 15. The MDS indicated Resident #18 was able to make herself understood and was able to understand others. The assessment did not indicate any wandering during the specified time frame. Review of a nursing note dated 03/04/24 at 6:13 P.M. revealed the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to implement the use of a stop sign across a resident's room to deter wandering residents from entering her room. This affected one (Resident #29) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed diagnoses including dementia, need for assistance with personal care, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of a care plan initiated 01/14/14 indicated Resident #29 had a self care performance deficit with potential for fluctuations and/or decline related to dementia, forgetfulness and impaired decision making. The care plan was updated to initiate a stop sign to the doorway to deter wandering residents from entering starting 01/26/24. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #29 was able to make herself understood and was able to understand others. Resident #29 was assessed as being severely cognitively impaired. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #18's family/responsible party and physician were notified when Resident #18 was located outside the facility unaccompanied by staff. This affected one (Resident #18) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of Resident #18's open medical record revealed diagnoses including dementia with agitation, type two diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, muscle wasting, anxiety disorder, long term use of insulin, vitamin B12 deficiency, and acute angle-closure glaucoma in bilateral eyes. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #18 was moderately cognitively impaired with a score of nine out of a possible score of 15. The MDS indicated Resident #18 was able to make herself understood and was able to understand others. The assessment did not indicate any wandering during the specified time frame.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, the facility post-fall monitoring report and interview, the facility failed to ensure neurological checks (series of assessments which reflect a resident's brain and neurological function) where completed, after unwitnessed falls, for one (Resident #13) of three residents reviewed for falls. The census was 46. Findings include: Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed diagnoses that included right sided paralysis, muscle wasting, contracture of the right hand, heart failure, stiffness of the right shoulder, speech disturbance, history of falling and hypertension. A physician's order dated 01/07/24 revealed the bed was to be in the lowest position at all times. Review of the fall information with Registered Nurse (RN) #100 revealed the following information. a. A nursing note dated 01/19/24 at 6:48 P.M. indicated a State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) notified the nurse Resident #13 was on the floor, in the bathroom, laying on his left side. No injuries were noted. Resident #13 was educated on the importance of using the call light for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of incident reports, policy review, review of manufacturer information for wanderguards, and interview, the facility failed to ensure elopement interventions were implemented, wanderguards and exit doors were monitored to ensure appropriate functionality, and failed to ensure a comprehensive fall prevention program was implemented. This affected two (Residents #13 and #18) of six residents reviewed for falls and elopement. The census was 46. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #18's open medical record revealed diagnoses including dementia with agitation, type two diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, major depressive disorder, muscle wasting, anxiety disorder, long term use of insulin, vitamin B12 deficiency, and acute angle-closure glaucoma in bilateral eyes. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #18 was moderately cognitively impaired with a score of nine out of a possible score of 15. The MDS indicated Resident #18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of drug-related information on www.medscape.com, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident had adequate indications for use of a psychotropic medication. This affected one (Resident #13) of five residents whose medications were reviewed. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of Resident #13's medical record revealed diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) affecting the right dominant side, rhabdomyolysis (condition in which damaged skeletal muscle breaks down rapidly)., contracture of the right hand, heart failure, BPH (a condition in which the flow of urine is blocked due to the enlargement of prostate gland)., gastroesophageal reflux disease, stiffness of the right shoulder, speech disturbance, acquired absence of the spleen, history of falling, hypertension, and muscle wasting. A physician order for risperidal (anti-psychotic) 0.25 milligrams every day was written on 03/04/24. On 05/21/24 at 8:28 A.M., Registered Nurse (RN) #100 stated she located a diagnosis of dementia to support the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, facility investigation review, personnel file review, facility policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from misappropriation when a staff member accepted money from a resident. This affected one (Resident #44) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 09/14/22. Diagnoses included fracture of left femur, muscle wasting and atrophy of multiple sites, cognitive communication deficit, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, and acquired absence of the left foot. Further review of Resident #44's medical record revealed the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 annual assessment, dated 09/22/23, indicated the resident had intact cognition. During interview on 03/06/24 at 11:49 A.M., Ombudsman #400 revealed on 02/13/24, during an advocacy visit to the facility, she interviewed Resident #44 and he stated he had given licensed practical nurse (LPN) #201 money and gifts for sexual favors,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, facility investigation review, personnel file review, facility policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of misappropriation when a staff member accepted money from a resident. This affected one (Resident #44) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 09/14/22. Diagnoses included fracture of left femur, muscle wasting and atrophy of multiple sites, cognitive communication deficit, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, and acquired absence of the left foot. Further review of Resident #44's medical record revealed the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 annual assessment, dated 09/22/23, indicated the resident had intact cognition. During interview on 03/06/24 at 11:49 A.M., Ombudsman #400 revealed on 02/13/24, during an advocacy visit to the facility, she interviewed Resident #44 and he stated he had given licensed practical nurse (LPN) #201 money and gifts for sexual favors, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, facility investigation review, personnel file review, facility policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation of misappropriation when a staff member accepted money from a resident. This affected one (Resident #44) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 42. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #44 revealed an admission date of 09/14/22. Diagnoses included fracture of left femur, muscle wasting and atrophy of multiple sites, cognitive communication deficit, acquired absence of right leg below the knee, and acquired absence of the left foot. Further review of Resident #44's medical record revealed the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 annual assessment, dated 09/22/23, indicated the resident had intact cognition. During interview on 03/06/24 at 11:49 A.M., Ombudsman #400 revealed on 02/13/24, during an advocacy visit to the facility, she interviewed Resident #44 and he stated he had given licensed practical nurse (LPN) #201 money and gifts for sexual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a wound treatment was provided as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #42) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 12/15/23. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, hypertension, muscle wasting and atrophy, and osteoarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 admission assessment, dated 12/28/23, indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition and required moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). The resident was occasionally incontinent of urine. Review of the plan of care, dated 01/04/24, revealed the resident had a pressure ulcer with interventions including to encourage good nutrition and hydration in order to promote healthier skin, to follow facility protocols for treatment of injury, and to keep skin clean and dry. Review of the physician order, dated 02/28/24, revealed the order to cleanse left buttock with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #42) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 42 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 12/15/23. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure, hypertension, muscle wasting and atrophy, and osteoarthritis. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 admission assessment, dated 12/28/23, indicated the resident had severely impaired cognition and required moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). The resident was occasionally incontinent of urine. Review of the plan of care, dated 01/09/24, revealed the resident had a potential nutritional problem related to diagnoses including congestive heart failure, altered fluid status/diuretic, and skin alterations with interventions including to monitor/record/report signs and symptoms of malnutrition and to monitor intake and record every meal. Review of a physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were provided admission packet and admission information timely to allow the resident and/or resident representative to participate in the care process. This affected one (Resident #40) of three residents reviewed for admission information. The facility census was 46. Findings include: Review of Resident #40's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/19/23 with diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Further review of the medical record including the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 admission assessment with a reference date of 07/28/23 revealed Resident #40 was cognitively intact. Further review of the medical record found no evidence of any admission paperwork within the medical record. Interview with Resident #40's representative on 09/21/23 at 8:49 A.M. indicated the resident or herself were not provided with an admission packet upon admission. She indicated Resident #40 and herself were provided the admission packet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure medication error rate was less than five percent. There were 30 medication errors out of 32 opportunities, resulting in a 93.75 percent medication error rate. This affected four residents (#26, #28, #31 and #37) out of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 43. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 07/19/23 with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm of the upper lobe of the left lung, diabetes mellitus, and heart failure. Review of the physician's orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) for August 2023 for Resident #37 revealed she had orders dated 07/19/23 for Amlodipine 5 milligrams (mg), one time a day at 8:00 A.M. for hypertension, Anastrozole (hormone based chemotherapy) 1 mg one time a day at 8:00 A.M., Aspirin one time a day at 8:00 A.M. for coronary artery disease, Vitamin D 250 micrograms (mcg) (supplement) one time a day at 8:00 A.M., Citalopram 40 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to maintain adequate infection control practices during administration of medications to residents. This affected four residents (#26, #28, #31 and #37) of four residents observed during medication administration. This also had the potential to affect two residents (#32 and #33) of two residents who received glucometer checks. The facility census was 43. Findings include: Medication administration observations were made on 08/02/23. At 6:49 A.M. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #200 was observed to prepare Resident #37's medications, enter Resident #37's room, lay the glucometer on her tray table without a barrier underneath. LPN #200 put on gloves and obtained Resident #37's blood sugar reading and then administered her medications. Upon leaving the room, LPN #200 took off her gloves and went to the medication cart and laid the glucometer on top of the medication cart. She threw away used supplies and then put the glucometer into the medication cart without cleaning it. She did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staffing schedule review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Registered Nursing services were provided at least eight hours per day. This had the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The census was 36. Findings include: Review of the facility staffing schedule for the week of 09/05/22 through 09/11/22 revealed no evidence of any registered nurses (RN) scheduled on 09/05/22 and 09/06/22. Interview with Scheduler #6 on 09/08/22 at 1:05 P.M. verified no RN coverage on 09/05/22 and 09/06/22.
- Potential for harm · F2022-09-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was clean and failed to ensure refrigerators in resident's rooms were monitored for temperature control. The ice machine being unclean had the ability to affect all 35 residents receiving food by mouth in the facility. The temperature monitoring of personal refrigerators had the ability to affect two Residents (#26 and #27) who had personal refrigerators in their rooms. The facility census was 36. Findings included: 1. Observation on 09/07/22 at 10:45 A.M. of the ice machine noted to have a black substance on the white plastic shield in the ice storage compartment. Interview at the time with Food Service Manager #12 stated, This ice machine doesn't look like it has been cleaned for a month. On 09/07/22 at 10:46 A.M. an interview with Dietary Manger #13 revealed the ice machine should be cleaned weekly. Review of the facility Weekly Cleaning Schedule revealed [NAME] Helper #15 was responsible for cleaning the inside, outside, and filter of the ice machine for the dates 09/01/22 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-12 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the resident, resident's representative, and ombudsman in writing of the reason for transfer. This affected four Residents (#16, #18, #19, and #33) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 36. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anemia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, essential hypertension, and encephalopathy. Review of Resident #16's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #16's progress notes revealed she was transferred to the local hospital on [DATE] and 07/24/22. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed no written notification of transfer to resident, resident's representative, or ombudsman. On 09/07/22 at 10:55 A.M. an interview with Social Service Designee (SSD) #51 revealed Resident #16, her representative, and the ombudsman did not receive a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-09-12 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to notify the resident or resident's representative in writing of the facility bed hold policy. This affected four Residents (#16, #18, #19, and #33) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 36. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anemia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, essential hypertension, and encephalopathy. Review of Resident #16's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #16's progress notes revealed she was transferred to the local hospital on [DATE] and 07/24/22. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed no proof of written notification of bed hold to the resident or the resident's representative. On 09/07/22 at 10:55 A.M. an interview with Social Services Designee (SSD) #51 revealed Resident #16 nor her representative were provided written documentation of bed hold notice.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an advanced directive was formulated upon admission. This affected two Residents (#86 and #186) of 16 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 36. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #186's record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of unspecified dementia, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder, essential hypertension, hypokalemia. Review of Resident #186's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #186's physician orders in both the electronic health record and the hard copy/paper record revealed no order for advanced directives. Review of Resident #186's progress notes revealed the facility had contacted the physician on 08/31/22 to verify medication orders, but advanced directive information was not obtained. Review of Resident #186's hard copy/paper record revealed a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care form from the previous…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician was notified regarding antibiotic medication delay. This affected one Resident (#19) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 36. Findings included: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, restless leg syndrome, generalized arthritis, essential hypertension, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. Review of Resident #19's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #19's chest x-ray results dated 07/05/22 revealed there was a left base infiltrate (indicative with pneumonia) which had increased since the chest x-ray obtained on 06/25/22 and the resident was to start on Ceftin (an antibiotic) one gram intramuscularly for the respiratory infection. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-12 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure transfer paperwork was completed and sent with the resident to the emergency department. This affected one Resident (#16) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 36. Findings included: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anemia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, essential hypertension, and encephalopathy. Review of Resident #16's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #16's progress notes revealed she was transferred to the local hospital on [DATE] and 07/24/22. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed the facility form titled Referral Information Form was completed and sent with Resident #16 for her transfer on 06/24/22. However, there was no documentation to support the form was completed for her transfer on 07/24/22. On 09/07/22 at 8:22 A.M. and interview with Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-12 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed upon admission. This affected one Resident (#186) of one Resident reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 36. Findings included: Review of Resident #186's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of unspecified dementia, hypothyroidism, anxiety disorder, essential hypertension, hypokalemia. Review of Resident #186's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #186's electronic health record and paper record revealed no documentation to support a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours of admission. On 09/06/22 at 11:07 A.M. an interview with Resident #186 revealed she did not remember ever talking with anyone about her plan of care. On 09/06/22 at 2:44 P.M. an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #39 verified she was unable to locate a baseline care plan for Resident #186. She also verified a baseline care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for respiratory infections. This affected two Residents (#16 and #19) of 16 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 36. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anemia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, essential hypertension, and encephalopathy. Review of Resident #16's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #16's progress notes revealed she was transferred to the local hospital on [DATE] due to a complaint of not feeling well, a temperature of 101.7 degrees Fahrenheit and moaning upon transfer to bed. Resident #16 returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #16's chest x-ray results dated 06/23/22 revealed left base infiltrate (indicative with pneumonia) and the resident was to start on Augmentin 875 milligrams (an antibiotic) orally twice a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure pressure relief interventions were in place as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #32) of one residents reviewed for pressure ulcer wounds. The facility identified one resident with pressure ulcer wounds. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/27/08 with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis and paraplegia. Further review of the medical record including pressure ulcer wound assessments revealed Resident #32 had a Stage 3 pressure ulcer wound (full thickness skin loss, subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed) to the right heel, an Unstageable pressure ulcer wound (known but unstageable due to coverage of wound bed by slough or eschar) to the left foot first metatarsal and a Stage 2 pressure ulcer wound (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with red pink wound bed) to the left medial leg. Review of physician's orders indicated the use of prevalon boots…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with contractures received appropriate services to maintain mobility and prevent further decrease in range of motion and failed to ensure restorative services were provided as ordered. This affected two (Resident #18 and Resident #32) of two residents reviewed for mobility. The facility identified three residents with contractures. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #18 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, dementia, obesity, chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, and anemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment, dated 07/05/22, indicated Resident #18's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 99, which indicated the interview was unable to be completed due to the resident rarely being understood. There were no behaviors or rejection of care. The resident was totally dependent of two-person assistance with bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure dietitian recommendations were completed for a resident with weight loss. This affected one Resident (#16) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 36. Findings included: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anemia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, essential hypertension, encephalopathy, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #16's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact and she had noted weight loss with no prescribed weight-loss regimen. It also revealed she had no functional decline due to weight loss. Review of Resident #16's care plan dated 12/28/21 revealed she had a potential for nutritional problems related to obese Body Mass Index (BMI), multiple wounds/increased nutritional needs, anemia, protein/calorie malnutrition, hypertension, and nutrition related altered labs and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's oxygen flow rate was set as ordered. This affected one (Resident #17) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility identified ten residents receiving respiratory treatments. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, bronchitis, muscle wasting and atrophy, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 07/05/22, indicated Resident #17's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15, which indicated intact cognition. There were no behaviors or rejection of care. The resident required extensive, one-person assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene. The resident received oxygen therapy. Review of the Care Plan, dated 10/08/13, revealed Resident #17 had shortness of breath due to COPD with interventions including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessment and communication with resident dialysis center was completed. This affected one (Resident #35) of one residents reviewed for dialysis services. The facility identified three resident currently receiving dialysis services. Findings include: Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/16/21 with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease with hemodialysis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of physician's orders revealed hemodialysis to be provided three times weekly at DCI Dialysis (DCI). Further review of the medical record including dialysis binder found no evidence of any resident pre dialysis assessment, post dialysis assessment or communication record with the dialysis provider. Review of the Memorandum of Agreement between the facility and dialysis provided signed by the dialysis provider and facility on 02/18/21 indicated the following: 1. Responsibilities of Long Term Care Facility (LTCF) indicates - b. LTCF…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-12 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a bed rail assessment was completed and failed to obtain informed consent from the resident/resident representative. This affected one (Resident #28) of one resident reviewed for accident hazards. The facility identified nine residents who used bed rails. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #28 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, chronic kidney disease, history of falling, muscle wasting and atrophy, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 07/28/22, indicated Resident #28's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. There were no behaviors or rejection of care. The resident required extensive, two-person assistance with bed mobility, transfers, walking in room, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. The mobility device used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a pharmacy recommendation for laboratory monitoring was addressed by the physician. This affected one (Resident #7) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety, muscle wasting and atrophy, repeated falls, polyneuropathy, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 06/07/22, indicated Resident #7's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. There were no behaviors or rejection of care. The resident required extensive, two-person assistance with bed mobility and extensive, one-person assistance with transfers, dressing, and toileting. Review of a physician order, dated 04/01/21, revealed the order for Vitamin D 2,000…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident specific behavioral monitoring with the use of psychotropic drugs. This affected three (Resident #7, #26, and #25) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 36. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 04/01/21 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety, muscle wasting and atrophy, repeated falls, polyneuropathy, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 06/07/22, indicated Resident #7's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. There were no behaviors or rejection of care. The resident required extensive, two-person assistance with bed mobility and extensive, one-person assistance with transfers, dressing, and toileting. Review of the Care Plan, dated 06/7/21, revealed Resident #7 uses antipsychotic medication and is at risk for effects with interventions including to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-09-12 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the correct hospice provider was documented in the Residents record. This affected one Resident (#19) of one residents reviewed for hospice and end of life care. The facility census was 36. Findings included: Review of Resident #19's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, restless leg syndrome, generalized arthritis, essential hypertension, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. Review of Resident #19's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact and was receiving hospice services for end of life care. Review of Resident #19's physician orders revealed she was receiving services from Hospice Provider #1. Review of Resident #19's hospice records revealed she was not receiving services from Hospice Provider #1, but from a different hospice provider. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure documented evidence of providing pneumococcal immunization education, the administration, or the refusal of the vaccine. This affected one (Resident #29) of five residents reviewed for immunizations. The facility census was 36. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 11/17/21 with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease, muscle wasting and atrophy, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and anemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, dated 08/05/22, indicated Resident #29's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 12, which indicated mild cognitive impairment. There were no behaviors or rejection of care. The resident required limited, one-person assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting. During review of Resident #29's medical record, there was no documentation of the information/education provided regarding the benefits and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure medications observed in the 100/200 hall medication cart, the 400/500 hall medication cart, the medication room and the treatment cart were properly labeled to ensure they were not used after expiration and/or properly stored to prevent unauthorized access. This affected five residents (#10, #22, #28, #33 and #42) from the 100/200 hall medication cart, four residents (#19, #24, #45 and #250) from the 400/500 hall medication cart and had the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Observation on 11/25/19 at 10:15 A.M. of the 400/500 medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #142 revealed two Novolog insulin flexpens and one Levemir flexpen were not dated when opened for Resident #45, one Levemir flexpen was not dated when opened for Resident #250, one bottle of Visine eye drops was not dated when opened for Resident #19, and one vial of Novolog insulin was not dated when opened for Resident #24. An interview at the time of the observation with LPN #142 verified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of medical records for Resident #33, #36, #44 and #47. This affected four residents (#33, #36, #44 and #47) of 14 residents whose medical records were reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #33's medical record revealed diagnoses including gout and osteoarthritis. Resident #33 had a physician's order, dated 06/23/18 for Ultram (pain medication) 50 milligrams (mg) to be administered every six hours as needed. Review of the September 2019 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated since 09/04/19, 12 doses of Ultram were administered. The October MAR indicated three doses of Ultram were administered. The November MAR indicated 8 doses of Ultram were administered from 11/01/19 to 11/17/19. Review of the Controlled Drug Administration records revealed in September, starting 09/04/19, 23 doses of Ultram were removed for administration. In October, 23 doses of Ultram were removed for administration. In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #41's written advance directive consent form was thoroughly completed. This affected one resident (#41) of 17 residents whose records were reviewed. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including diabetes mellitus, dementia without behavioral disturbances, hypertension and cardiac murmur. Review of Resident #41's physician's orders dated 05/21/19 revealed the resident had advance directives including an order for a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC). Review of Resident #41's physician signed advanced directive, Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care form, dated 05/24/19, revealed the form was not complete, as the DNRCC and the DNRCC-Arrest options were both left blank, with neither option selected. Interview on 11/26/19 at 9:15 A.M., with Minimum Data Set (MDS) Registered Nurse (RN) #151 verified the signed advance directive form was not complete and did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Self Reported Incident (SRI) documentation and staff interview the facility failed to effectively implement their abuse policy and procedure to ensure all allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This affected three residents (#2, #32 and #37) of three residents reviewed in three facility SRI reports. Findings include: 1. Review of the SRI tracking number 187111 revealed on 01/14/20 an allegation/suspicion of physical, emotional, and verbal abuse was made invovling Resident #32. The SRI revealed Resident #32 voiced complaints State tested nursing assistants (STNA) #26 was to rough during care and that inappropriate comments where being made while care was provided. Review of the SRI revealed the investigation included three statements. RN #49 who overheard STNA #26 say to the resident your not baby, I'm not going to treat you like a baby. You need to help pull up your own pants. You need to do more for yourself. RN #49 went in the room and asked the aide to leave and she finished helping her. STNA #26's statement indicated she was encouraging the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of Self Reported Incident (SRI) documentation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure all allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated. This affected three residents (#2, #32 and #37) of three residents reviewed in three facility SRI reports. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident was assessed to be alert and oriented with episodes of forgetfulness. The resident had primary diagnoses of anemia, anxiety and depression. Review of the SRI tracking number 187111 revealed on 01/14/20 an allegation/suspicion of physical, emotional, and verbal abuse was made involving Resident #32. The SRI revealed Resident #32 voiced complaints State tested nursing assistants (STNA) #26 was to rough during care and that inappropriate comments where being made while care was provided. Review of the SRI revealed the investigation included three statements. RN #49 who overheard STNA #26 say to the resident your not baby,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized and comprehensive activities program for Resident #47 in accordance with the resident's preferences. This affected one resident (#47) of ten residents interviewed regarding activities. Findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed diagnoses including dementia and anxiety disorder. A plan of care initiated 11/04/15 (no revision date) revealed Resident #47 had little or no activity involvement related to her wishes not to participate, preferring to remain in her bed watching television, reading, and playing games on a hand held unit. One of the interventions was to explain the importance of social interaction to the resident and encourage participation. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #47 was moderately cognitively impaired but had no behavioral symptoms. Review of activity participation logs for September 2019 through November 2019…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-27 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure timely implementation of interventions after identifying significant weight loss, failed to notify the physician, and failed to timely re-weigh Resident #37 following a hospitalization. This affected one resident (#37) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: Review of Resident #37's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/19/18 with diagnoses including history of cardiovascular accident, dysphagia, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the physician orders, dated 03/19/18, revealed an order for monthly weights Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/20/19 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living including eating. Review of the resident's weights revealed the following: On 10/14/19 198.3 pounds On 10/22/19 198.4 pounds On 11/05/19 197.2 pounds On 11/11/19 178.3 pounds (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #47's dialysis access site was monitored in accordance with physician orders, failed to monitor fluid intake due to fluid restrictions and failed to ensure a fluid restriction worksheet was consistent with the ordered fluid restriction and failed to schedule and administer medication in accordance with guidelines provided by dialysis. This affected one resident (#47) of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified three residents on dialysis. Findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed diagnoses including dementia and end stage renal disease. Resident #47 had orders for dialysis three times a week. On 08/05/17, an order was written to clean the permcath (dialysis access site) according to policy, apply bactroban and a dry dressing as necessary. On 09/27/18, an order was written to assess the permcath site every shift. A permcath is a long, flexible tube that is inserted into a vein most commonly in the neck (internal jugular vein) and less commonly in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure laboratory (PT/INR) testing was completed for Resident #44 who received the anticoagulant medication, Coumadin to ensure the resident received the appropriate dosage of the medication. This affected one resident (#44) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of heart failure, gout, urinary tract infections, chronic kidney disease, congenital malformation of the eye, dementia, chronic pain, edema, arteriosclerotic heart disease, sick sinus syndrome, cardiac pacemaker, schizoaffective disorder, Alzheimer's dementia, atrial fibrillation, colitis and long-term use of anticoagulants. Review of the plan of care, dated 06/24/19 revealed Resident #44 was on anticoagulant therapy related to atrial fibrillation. Intervention included to administer anticoagulant medication as ordered, laboratory tests as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to obtain a stop date or obtain an appropriate rationale for the continued use of the as needed (prn) antianxiety medication, Lorazepam for Resident #250. This affected one resident (#250) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of Resident #250's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular diseases, absence of right and left legs, hypertension, hypokalemia, hyperlipidemia, hemiplegia following cerebral infarction affecting left dominant side, muscle weakness, transient cerebral ischemic attack, acute kidney disease, morbid obesity and anemia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 11/13/19 revealed Resident #250 had intact cognition and received an antianxiety medication seven days a week. Review of the physician's orders, dated November 2019 revealed Resident #250 had an order for 0.5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOLGER, JAMES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | 25% | since 01/01/2000 |
| BOLGER, RENA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 26% | since 01/01/2000 |
| BOLGER, STEPHEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 25% | since 05/29/2001 |
| BOYLE, DENISE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | 25% | since 01/01/2000 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $65K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366241. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.