Maplecrest Nursing And Hta

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 33 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 49.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.34 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program to prevent the development of pressure ulcers, timely identify new pressure ulcers and perform wound care using appropriate infection control practices. This affected one resident (#43) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. This had the potential to affect four residents (#4, #9, #17, and #43) identified by the facility with pressure ulcers. Actual Harm occurred on 01/29/25 when Resident #43, who was dependent on staff assistance for most all activities of daily living (ADL) including toileting, and transfers, and required substantial to maximum assistance with rolling left and right in bed, was found to have an in-house acquired unstageable (full thickness tissue loss in which the actual depth of the ulcer was obscured by slough/ dead skin) pressure ulcer to his right gluteal fold (horizontal crease between the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #43's advance directives were accurate in the physician orders and care plan. This affected one resident (Resident #43) out of one resident (Resident #43) reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 46. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 12/09/24 and diagnoses including acute kidney failure, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and muscle wasting with atrophy. Review of the care plan dated 12/10/24 revealed Resident #43's advance directives indicated he was a full code. Review of the Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) Comfort Care form in Resident #43's medical record revealed on 12/13/24 Primary Care Physician (PCP) #482 signed the form indicating Resident #43 was a DNR comfort care- arrest. Review of the DNR Comfort Care form in Resident #43's medical record revealed on 12/26/24 PCP #482 changed Resident #43's advance directives from a DNR comfort care-…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #43's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line (a long flexible tube usually inserted into the vein in the upper arm and passed through a larger vein near the heart to administer medications and other treatments) dressing was changed as ordered. This affected one resident (Resident #43) out of one resident (Resident #43) reviewed for intravenous (IV) therapy. Findings included: Review of medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 12/09/24 and diagnoses including acute kidney failure, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and muscle wasting with atrophy. Review of undated care plan revealed Resident #43 had intravenous (IV) medications. Interventions included IV dressing change as ordered, and monitor, document and report as needed signs and symptoms of infection at the site including drainage, inflammation, swelling, redness and warmth. Review of March and April 2025 physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were reviewed and responded to timely from the physician. This affected one resident (#29) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The current census was 46. Findings included: Review of Resident #29 record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #29 included cerebral infarction, schizoaffective disorder, major depression, hemiplegia, anxiety disorder and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident #29's Minimum Data Set ( MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had good cognition and was receiving antipsychotic, antidepressant, diuretic, and antiplatelet medication during the assessment period. Review of the physician order dated 10/28/24 revealed Risperidone oral tablet one milligram by mouth at bed time for schizoaffective disorder. Review of Resident #29's Pharmacy Drug Regimen Review sheet with dates of 04/17/24 through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and policy review the facility failed to ensure physician ordered diet modification texture was followed as required. This affected one resident (#5) of three residents reviewed for diet texture. The facility census was 46. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 11/11/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to gastrointestinal hemorrhage, chronic kidney disease, neoplasm of parotid gland, dysphagia and cognitive communication deficit. Review of the Care Plan dated 03/10/25 revealed Resident #5 had swallowing problems related to swallowing assessment results per Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) study. Resident #5 had a potential risk of aspiration. Interventions included monitor dietary intake. Monitor, document, report as needed dysphagia such as pocketing, choking, coughing, drooling, holding food in mouth, and several attempts to swallow. Aid with meals as needed to encourage intake. Refer to speech therapist for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to perform wound care using appropriate infection control practices. This affected one resident (#43) of one resident observed for wound care. This had the potential to affect six Residents (#4, #9, #17, #18, #31 and #43) identified by the facility with wounds requiring dressing changes. Findings included: Review of medical record for Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 12/09/24 and diagnoses including acute kidney failure, hypertension, osteoarthritis, and muscle wasting with atrophy. Review of the care plan dated 12/10/24 revealed Resident #43 was at risk for impaired skin integrity. Interventions included skin assessment on admission, quarterly, annually and upon significant change, encourage and assist in turning and repositioning every two hours and as indicated, and treatments and dressings as ordered by the physician. Review of the Outside Wound Clinic progress note dated 01/29/25 and completed by Wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess the skin underneath Resident #28's right lower extremity hinged brace resulting in an in-house acquired stage II pressure ulcer under the brace. This affected one resident (#28) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 04/23/24. Diagnoses included displaced comminuted fracture of the shaft of the right femur, chronic atrial fibrillation, and cerebral infarction. Review of the physician's order dated 04/26/24 revealed Resident #28 had an order for a right lower extremity hinged brace which was to remain intact and only to be removed for personal hygiene. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #28 required substantial/maximal assistance for eating, oral hygiene, upper body dressing, and showering/bathing.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure Resident #51 was not verbally abused by a nurse. This affected one resident (#51) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 04/17/23 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic systolic congestive heart failure, cerebral aneurism non ruptured and hyperlipidemia. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 12/26/23, revealed the resident had a Brief Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition. Resident #51 had no behavioral problems, hallucinations, or delusions. Review of the Self Reported Incident (SRI), dated 01/28/24, revealed on 01/27/24, the daughter of Resident #51 reported to the facility Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on duty that she was very upset by the way her mother had been spoken to by LPN #105 on 01/26/24. Resident #51's daughter stated her mother, Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #40's advance directives were accurately reflected in the resident's medical record (the physician's orders and care plan were different). This affected one resident (#40) of one resident reviewed for advance directives. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 09/30/21 with diagnoses including dementia, hypertension, spinal stenosis, and depression. Review of comprehensive care plan, dated 10/31/21 revealed Resident #40 wished to have her advanced directives honored as she was a Full Code. Review of a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form for Resident #40 located in her medical record revealed on 11/30/21 Primary Care Physician (PCP) #900 signed a DNR Comfort Care- Arrest advance directive form for the resident. No other DNR forms were noted in the resident's medical record. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/14/22 revealed Resident #40 was rarely or never understood. Review of the September 2022…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-08 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview the facility failed to notify Resident #43's representative in writing of a discharge to the hospital. This affected one resident (#43) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's closed medical record revealed an initial admission date of 06/21/22 with diagnoses including hemiplegia/hemiparesis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, anxiety, anemia, diabetes, hypertensive kidney disease, hyperlipidemia and gastrostomy. Review of a progress note indicated Resident #43 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] for acute renal failure, gastrointestinal bleed and anemia. Resident #43 was then discharged from the hospital to a different facility closer to her family. Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed no evidence the resident's representative was provided in writing a transfer/discharge notice indicating the reasons for the discharge, the effective date of the discharge, the location where Resident #43 was sent, a statement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-09-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #34, who was identified as being at moderate risk for wandering/elopement had a care plan specifying this risk with individualized interventions. This affected one resident (#34) of one resident reviewed for wandering/elopement. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 04/08/22 with diagnoses including dementia, hypertension and hearing loss. Review of an admission Wandering Assessment, dated 04/08/22 and completed by Registered Nurse (RN) #502 revealed Resident #34 was at moderate risk for wandering. The assessment revealed Resident #34 was disoriented, forgetful, had a short attention span and she did not understand her surroundings. Review of the comprehensive care plan, with a date of initiation of 04/11/22 revealed Resident #34 did not have a care plan that identified Resident #34 the risk for wandering/elopement. Review of a quarterly Wander Assessment, dated 07/26/22 and completed by Licensed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH