Kingston Health Center of Sylvania
4121 King Road, Sylvania, OH 43560 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 127 certified beds · (419) 517-8200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 2.8% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.9% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 0.4% | 2.0% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.9% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.9% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.9% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 27.6% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.8% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.8% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.1% | 24.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.1% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.02 | 1.73 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.11 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 534 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 67.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 212 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.4%CMS range 54.3–62.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.0%CMS range 7.2–11.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 67.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 4.4–8.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 127 beds and averages 120.3 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.30 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.50 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.03 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THIS DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN EXAMPLE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE. Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility policy, review of facility investigation documentation, and review of facility corrective action documentation, the facility failed to ensure staff utilized a mechanical lift safely during transfer of Resident #1. Actual harm occurred when two state tested nurse aides lifted Resident #1 with a mechanical lift from a wheelchair and one lift sling strap became dislodged causing Resident #1 to fall to the floor. As a result of the fall Resident #1 sustained subdural hematoma and required hospitalization. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for mechanical lift transfers in a facility census of 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, acute respiratory distress, type II diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, major depression, vitamin D deficiency, hypertension, anemia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, review of a test tray, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure resident meals were palatable and served at an appropriate temperature. This had the potential to affect all 122 residents in the facility.Findings include:Interview on 01/05/26 at 9:53 A.M. with Resident #112 revealed the vegetables were overcooked and the portions seemed to be getting smaller. Interview on 01/05/26 at 10:22 A.M. with Resident #36 revealed the food was visually unappealing, was not seasoned, and was cold. Interview on 01/05/26 at 10:55 A.M. with Resident #77 revealed the food was cold and bland. Interview on 01/05/26 at 12:00 P.M. with Resident #20 revealed the food was always cold and did not taste good. Interview on 01/05/26 at 2:48 P.M. with Resident #83 revealed she did not like the food and the food was often cold. Interview on 01/06/26 at 9:14 A.M. with Resident #130 revealed Resident #130 often asked for meal substitutes because the main meal was always cold and unseasoned. Interview on 01/07/06 at approximately 9:30 A.M. with [NAME] #727 revealed the beef…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespreadSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, review of the legionella weekly fixture exercise logs for the year of 2025, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure documentation for legionella prevention was accurate. This had the potential to affect all residents. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure medications were accurately transcribed and the medical record was accurate regarding the receipt of medications for Resident #20. This affected one resident (#20) of four residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility census was 122.Findings include: 1. Review of the Legionella weekly fixture exercise log for the year of 2025 revealed the documents for July, August, and September had been copied and used again for the months of October, November, and December. Interview on 01/07/26 at 12:52 A.M. with Regional Nurse/Registered Nurse #800 verified the Legionella documents were photocopied. Interview on 01/07/26 at 2:50 P.M. with Maintenance Assistant (MA) #689 verified he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-12 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the psychotropic consent forms, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were informed of and consented to the use of psychotropic medications prior to administration. This affected five residents (#113, #3, #5, #4 and #49) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 122. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #113's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/21/25 and a discharge date of 01/08/26. Diagnoses included adjustment disorder, Parkinson's disease, type II diabetes, dementia with mood disorder, immunodeficiency due to medications (cancer medications), major depressive disorder, and general anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #113's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating Resident #113 was moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #113 required maximal assistance with toilet use, bathing, and dressing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to administer medications per physician orders. This affected three residents (#5, #20, and #125) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. The medication error rate was 21.43 percent with six errors for the 28 medication opportunities. The facility census was 122.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/06/25. Diagnoses included hypertensive chronic kidney disease stage 3B, anxiety, non-ischemic myocardial injury, gout, and type II diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #5's Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01 which indicated Resident #5 had severely impaired cognition. Review of Resident #5's physician orders revealed an order initiated on 12/23/25 for a Depakote oral tablet delayed release 125 milligrams (mg) with instructions to give one tablet by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of the medical record, and review of the menu spreadsheet, the facility failed to ensure residents on a pureed diet received adequate protein portions. This affected all five residents (#5, #21, #72, #80, and #124) on a pureed diet. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure residents on a pureed diet received all menu items on their meal tray. This affected one (#80) of one resident observed for menu items. Further, the facility failed to ensure residents received double portions as ordered. This affected one (#77) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 122.Findings include:1. Observations on 01/07/26 beginning at 11:37 A.M. revealed [NAME] #729 and [NAME] #727 plating meals for the noon meal, including trays for residents on a pureed diet. Interview and observation on 01/07/26 at 11:59 A.M. with [NAME] #727 confirmed a blue handled serving scoop was used to plate pureed beef brisket. Follow-up observation on 01/07/26 at 12:45 P.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-12 · tag F0836 — patternEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nurses dispensed and administered medications within appropriate standards of practice. This affected 12 residents (#16, #34, #35, #36, #46, #62, #70, #72, #85, #111, #125, and #126). The facility census was 122.Findings include:Interview on 01/06/26 at 11:22 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #684 revealed she was an agency nurse and arrived late for the shift on 01/06/26. LPN #684 stated she completed a medication pass in coordination with Medication Aide - Certified (MA-C) #653. LPN #684 stated she pulled the medications from the cart, charted the medications were administered, and handed the medications to MA-C #653 to administer to residents.Interview on 01/06/26 at 11:29 A.M. with MA-C #653 confirmed she assisted LPN #684 with a medication pass. Follow-up interview on 01/06/25 at 1:07 P.M. with MA-C #653 revealed she worked with LPN #684 during the morning medication pass on 01/06/26. MA-C #653 stated they were working together because LPN #684 arrived late for her shift. MA-C #653 stated LPN #684…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during care of residents on isolation and in enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). This affected six residents (#15, #9, #94, #119, #82, and #72) of eight residents reviewed for infection control practices. The facility census was 122. Findings include: 1. Observation on 01/05/26 at 10:22 A.M. found Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #655 entered room [ROOM NUMBER] occupied by Resident #15. CNA #655 wore standard glasses, donned a gown, gloves, and an N-95 mask prior to entering the room. A sign was posted on the door indicating Resident #15 was on droplet precautions. The posting listed the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when entering the room was gloves, gown, goggles, and an N-95 mask. CNA #655 did not apply goggles or any other eye protection over her standard glasses. CNA #655 did not disinfect her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a toilet raiser was provided for resident #130. This affected one (#130) of one resident reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility census was 122. Findings include:Review of Resident #130's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/25/25. Diagnoses included hypertensive heart disease, acute pulmonary edema, unspecified atrial fibrillation, anxiety, depression, a non-pressure chronic ulcer of other part of right foot with fat layer exposed and a non-pressure chronic ulcer of the left thigh limited to breakdown of skin. Review of Resident #130's admission/Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated Resident #130 had intact cognition. Furthermore, Resident #130 was dependent for toileting hygiene and lower body dressing, required substantial or maximal assistance for sitting to standing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders were signed in the medical record. This affected one (#50) of 24 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 122.Findings include:Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, and depression. Review of Resident #50's Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05 which indicated Resident #50 had severely impaired cognition.Review of Resident #50's physician orders revealed an order for code status; Do Not Resuscitate - Comfort Care Arrest (DNR-CCA) that was initiated on [DATE].Review of Resident #50's care plan dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 and her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to inform a resident of an impending room change. This affected one resident (#77) who was unexpectedly moved to a new room. This had the ability to affect all residents. The facility census was 122. Findings include:Review of medical record revealed Resident #77 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included osteoarthritis, diabetes mellitus, hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and cardiomegaly.Review of Resident #77's 5-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was intact.Review of Resident #77's most recent care plan revealed that while in the facility choices were important to her.Review of Resident #77's progress note dated 01/02/26 at 11:15 A.M. revealed the resident was moved to room [ROOM NUMBER]-A with a report, medications, and chart were given to the nurse assigned.Interview with Resident #77 on 01/05/26 at 10:36 A.M. revealed she was moved from her room on the second floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor the use of psychotropic medications to confirm they were necessary. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 122.Findings include:Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] and had diagnosis that included insomnia. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 11/08/25, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment indicated Resident #4 had reported trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, or sleeping too much, on 12 to 14 days of the two-week assessment period.Review of Resident #4's physician orders revealed they included an order for trazodone hydrochloride (an antidepressant) 50 milligrams (mg) daily at bedtime, and an order for Ramelteon (a Melatonin receptor agonist) 8 mg daily at bedtime. Both orders were dated 11/02/25 and both orders specified the medications were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of policy for care planning, the facility failed to develop a care plan for a diagnosis of insomnia. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of 23 residents reviewed for care planning. The census was 122.Findings include:Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] and had diagnosis that included insomnia. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 11/08/25, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment indicated Resident #4 had reported trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, or sleeping too much, on 12 to 14 days of the two-week assessment period.Review of Resident #4's physician orders revealed they included an order for trazodone hydrochloride (an antidepressant) 50 milligrams (mg) daily at bedtime, and an order for Ramelteon (a Melatonin receptor agonist) 8 mg daily at bedtime. Both orders were dated 11/02/25 and both orders specified the medications were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received adequate activities of daily living care. This affected one Resident (#77) for toenail care and one Resident #72 for fingernail care. This had the ability to affect all residents. The facility census was 122.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #77's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/07/26. Diagnoses included osteoarthritis, type II diabetes mellitus, and a history of lower leg cellulitis. Review of Resident #77's 5-day admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an intake cognition. The resident required substantial assistance with rolling left and right and lying to sitting. Review of Resident #77's most recent care plan revealed the resident required assistance with activities of daily living related to weakness, low hemoglobin, and osteoarthritis in bilateral knees. Staff assistance was required for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff assessed wounds accurately. This affected Resident #123 and had the potential to affect 31 residents (#1, #6, #12, #15, #20, #27, #33, #36, #38, #49, #51, #57, #59, #68, #72, #87, #89, #95, #97, #99, #103, #104, #112, #120, #123, #124, #127, #129, #137, #140, and #141) identified with wounds. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive food in preparation for a scheduled medical test. This affected one (#4) of one resident reviewed for medical testing. The facility census was 122. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #123 revealed an admission date of 04/12/15 with diagnoses of anxiety, chronic respiratory therapy, depression, embolism and thrombosis. Resident #123 was under the care of hospice. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/13/25, revealed Resident #123 had impaired cognition, was dependent on staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure-reducing devices were in place. This affected two (#28 and #123) of six residents reviewed for skin breakdown. The facility census was 122.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 12/22/25 with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation, dementia, and Raynaud syndrome. Review of the comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/29/25, revealed Resident #28 had impaired cognition and required substantial/maximal assistance for bed mobility. Further review revealed Resident #28 was at risk for developing pressure injuries.Review of the current care plan, initiated 12/22/25, revealed Resident #28 was at risk for impaired skin integrity, Interventions, initiated 12/23/25, revealed staff should off-load Resident #28's heels while in bed. Review of the physician order dated 12/23/25 revealed Resident #28 was to wear heel lift boots to both lower extremities when in bed. Observation on 01/05/26 at 2:07 P.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure tube feedings were administered per the physician's orders and per professional nursing standards of practice. This affected one (#5) of one resident review for tube feeding. The facility census was 122.Findings include: Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/06/25. Diagnoses included hypertensive chronic kidney disease stage 3B, anxiety, non-ischemic myocardial injury, gout, and type two diabetes mellitus.Review of Resident #5's Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01 which indicated Resident #5 had severely impaired cognition. Furthermore, Resident #5 was dependent for eating and all mobility.Review of Resident #5's care plan with a date initiated of 12/06/25 revealed Resident #5 required a tube feeding to maintain adequate nutrition and hydration with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician orders. This affected one (#3) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 122.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 12/01/25 with diagnoses of hypertensive heart disease and chronic kidney disease, dementia, and heart failure. Resident #3 discharged home on [DATE].Review of the comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/08/25, revealed Resident #3 had impaired cognition and received antipsychotics, and antianxiety and antidepressant medications. Review of the physician order initiated 12/01/25 and discontinued upon discharge on [DATE], revealed Resident #3 received Lisinopril (a blood pressure lowering medication) oral tablet 40 milligrams (mg), one tablet daily for hypertension; hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure) less than 100 millimeters of Mercy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of policy for medication storage, the facility failed to label insulin injector pens with open dates. This affected three residents (Residents #5, #20, and #148). The facility identified 22 residents with current orders for insulin injections. Further, the facility failed to properly store medications during the medication administration process. This affected one resident (Resident #20) of four residents observed during medication administration. The census was 122.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/06/25 with diagnoses that included type II diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #5's physician orders revealed they included an order for insulin Glargine (Lantus) solution via pen injector, inject 35 units every 12 hours for diabetes. Observation on 01/12/26 at 10:47 A.M. of the C-2 Hall medication cart, revealed it contained an insulin Glargine pen injector for Resident #5, with approximately 70 units of insulin remaining. The pen injector was not marked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility submitted Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), review of personnel records, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from staff-to-resident abuse. This affected one (#108) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 117.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #108 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia moderate with other behavioral disturbances, chronic kidney disease stage two, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, and dysphagia oropharyngeal phase.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/19/25, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance with chair to bed transfers. Review of nursing progress note, dated 09/23/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of a facility submitted Self-Reported Incident (SRI), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff timely reported allegations of abuse. This affected one (#108) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 117.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #108 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia moderate with other behavioral disturbances, chronic kidney disease stage two, anxiety disorder, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, and dysphagia oropharyngeal phase.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/19/25, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required substantial assistance with chair to bed transfers. Review of a nursing progress note dated 09/23/25 at 7:15 A.M. revealed a bruise was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment. This affected 18 (Residents #75, #1, #7, #47, #53, #54, #55, #60, #65, #66, #69, #74, #78, #102, #104, #109, #114, and #115) of 18 residents reviewed. The facility census was 126. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 02/12/25 with diagnoses including displaced fracture of neck of right radius, fracture of left pubis, fracture of right pubis, Parkinson's disease, depression, osteoporosis, and urge incontinence. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating Resident #75 was cognitively intact. Observation on 03/10/25 at 9:57 A.M. of Resident #75's room revealed there were three spots on the floor that were sticky and scattered debris on the floor. Interview on 03/10/25 at 10:00 A.M.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of maintenance work orders, review of call light logs and review of policy, the facility failed to maintain a functional call light system. This affected six (#37, #38, #44, #59, #78, and #108) with the potential to affect all 105 residents in a facility. The total facility census was 105. Findings include: Observation on 10/24/24 at 4:20 A.M., revealed the green light above Resident #38's room was illuminated. Interview on 10/24/24 at 4:20 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #207 revealed the green light above each resident room is intended to illuminate when a member of therapy staff is in the room with the resident. Observation on 10/24/24 at 4:22 A.M., revealed Resident #38 was asleep in her room with no therapy staff present. Interview on 10/24/24 at 4:23 A.M., with LPN #207 verified the light was green above the door but no staff were in the room. Observation on 10/24/24 at 5:27 A.M., revealed the green light above Resident #38's room continued to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance during resident care, resulting in the resident falling out of bed. This affected one (Resident #87) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed an admission date of 11/13/23. Diagnoses included quadriplegia and left lower leg amputation. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #87 was cognitively intake and dependent on staff for all care. The resident suffered impairment to bilateral sides of his upper and lower body. Review of Resident #87's most recent care plan revealed the resident was at risk for falls due to quadriplegia. Review of Resident #87's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 06/01/24 revealed he was at a high risk for falls. Review of the nurse's note dated 06/01/24 revealed Resident #87 fell out of bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from significant medication errors when an antibiotic was not administered as ordered for one (#3) of five residents reviewed for medication administration in a facility census of 112. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hypotension, chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, dementia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, congestive heart failure, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. Review of the physician order dated 07/12/23 revealed an order for the administration the antibiotic cephalexin 500 milligrams (mg) every morning and at bedtime for cellulitis to the toe for 10 days. Review of the medication administration record noted the cephalexin 500 mg to be documented as administered twice on 07/13/23 twice and once in the morning on 07/14/23. Beginning with the 07/14/23 evening dose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with clean linen. This affected one (Resident #70) of three residents reviewed for a clean and sanitary environment. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #70 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included localization related symptomatic epilepsy and epileptic syndromes with complex partial seizures, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 was cognitively intact. Review of the progress note dated 06/01/23, revealed Resident #70 had a mole noted to his back area. There was bloody drainage coming from under the mole. The physician provided a one time treatment ordered and advised the mole would be removed the next day.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's personal hygiene needs were met. This affected one (Resident #58) of one resident reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #58 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, Parkinson's disease, hyperlipidemia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #58 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive one person assistance with dressing and personally hygiene and extensive two person assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and toilet use. Resident #58 required two person total dependence for transfers and total dependence one person for locomotion on and off…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure auto-lock brakes were applied to a resident's wheelchair as ordered to potentially prevent falls. This affected one (Resident #41) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 113. Findings include: Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/13/20. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, respiratory failure, type II diabetes mellitus, heart disease, heart failure, history of falling, and dysphagia. Review of Resident #41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident required extensive assistance of two staff for the majority of activities of daily living. Review of Resident #41's active physician orders identified an order dated 01/03/23 for auto-lock brakes to wheelchair. Review of Resident #41's plan of care dated 09/05/20 and revised 03/21/23, revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, facility pain clinical protocol and manufacture owners manual, the facility failed to ensure pain control interventions were monitored for effectiveness. This affected one resident (#52) reviewed for pain control interventions. Facility census 113. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #52 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, cerebral infarction with hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting left non-dominant side, hypertension, anxiety, osteoporosis, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #52 was cognitively intact, dependent on staff for the completion of activities of daily living, dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfer, and received as needed pain medications. Further review of the medical record revealed on 05/08/23, a nursing plan of care was implemented to address Resident #52's pain related to osteoporosis. Interventions included the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Observation on 02/26/20 at 5:18 P.M. revealed DM #500 was in the kitchen cooking at the stove, and plating food for hall trays. DM #500 had a hair net on, however did not have her bangs and approximately two inches of the front of her hair covered. Interview with DM #500 at the time of the observation verified the hair nets were required in the kitchen and her hair was not fully covered. Review of the facility policy titled Dietary Infection Control approval date April 2014 revealed hair restraints are required and should cover all hair. 3. Observation on 02/24/20 at 12:29 P.M. of hall trays being served by State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #587 to room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed she assisted the resident with set up of her food tray with bare hands touching several surfaces on, and around the tray. The STNA touched several personal items of the resident in assisting the resident to reposition to eat more comfortably. STNA #587 did not do any hand hygiene before leaving room [ROOM NUMBER]. The STNA #587 went…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse was reported to the State Agency. This affected one Resident (#39) of one reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, quadriplegia, and chronic diastolic congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #39's progress note dated 02/16/20 revealed Resident #39 reported to his brother a State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) threatened to harm him. Resident #39's brother called the facility and reported the allegation to Registered Nurse (RN) #625. There was no evidence RN #625 reported the allegation to the Administrator. There was no evidence the facilty reported the allegation to the state agency. Interview on 02/26/20 at 6:11 P.M. with the Administrator verified he was not aware an allegation of staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse was thoroughly investigated. This affected one Resident (#39) of one reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, quadriplegia, and chronic diastolic congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #39's progress note dated 02/16/20 revealed Resident #39 reported to his brother a State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) threatened to harm him. Resident #39's brother called the facility and reported the allegation to Registered Nurse (RN) #625. There was no evidence RN #625 reported the allegation to the Administrator. There was no evidence the facilty reported the allegation to the state agency. Interview on 02/26/20 at 6:11 P.M. with the Administrator verified he was not aware an allegation of staff to resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Medical record review revealed Resident #78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #78's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Continued review of Resident #78's medical record revealed the resident was transferred to the local hospital on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. There was no evidence the resident received a copy of the facility's bed hold policy. Interview on 02/27/20 at 8:32 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was no evidence Resident #78 was provided a copy of the facility's bed hold policy. Review of the facility policy titled, Bed Hold, Transfer, and Discharge Notice, approval date of September 2018 revealed at the time of transfer to an acute care facility (hospital) or as soon as practicable the resident and their representative will be issued transfer notice for Ohio facilities, or the notice of transfer discharge. A bed hold notice was required at the time of transfer or in the case of emergency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a plan of care for the use of a Foley catheter for one Resident (#105) of 24 reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The resident was noted to be admitted to the facility with an indwelling Foley catheter in place. Review of the comprehensive plan of care revealed revealed there was no care plan in place for catheter care for Resident #105. Review of the physician orders revealed the Foley catheter was discontinued for Resident #105 on 02/11/20, and to check post-void residual every eight hours, for 72 hours. On 02/14/20 a physician order revealed to restart the Foley catheter. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/26/20 at 10:30 A.M. verified Resident #105 had a Foley Catheter in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, resident interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide an individualized activity program designed to meet the interests and social needs of nonverbal residents. This affected one Resident (#63) of one reviewed for activities. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis, aphasia, and dementia. Review of Resident #63's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was rarely or never understood. Resident #63 was totally dependent on staff for transfer, and locomotion. Review of Resident #63's care plan revised 01/22/20 revealed supports and interventions included to pursue independent activity daily, such as television, radio, visits, and reading (large print as needed). In addition Resident #63 was to attend group activities of interest, such as, church services,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on test tray tasting, staff interview, resident interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and appealing. This affected one Resident (#215) of six reviewed for food quality. The facility census was 123. Findings include: A test tray completed on 02/26/20 at 5:54 P.M. revealed the dinner meal consisted of chicken stir fry over rice with snap peas. The stir fry vegetables were unidentifiable and mushy. The snap peas were mushy and gray. The presentation was unappealing, grayish, and brownish in color. The temperature of the food was warm, not hot. The snap peas tasted bland with no seasoning, and the consistency was mushy. The chicken stir fry was salty. The test tray was sampled by two state surveyors and the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #707. The ADON verified the snap peas were bland and mushy. Interview with Resident #215 on 02/27/20 at 10:16 A.M. verified she had the chicken stir fry with rice and snap peas for the dinner meal on 02/26/20. Resident #215 stated the snap peas were not good and she did not eat them.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices during a dressing change. This affected one Resident (#214) of three reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 123. Findings include: Review of the medical record for the Resident #214 revealed an admission dated of 02/06/20 with diagnoses including acute kidney failure, congestive heart failure, type two diabetes, dependence on renal dialysis, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). Review Resident #214's pressure injury review dated 02/06/20 revealed an unavoidable stage two pressure ulcer of the right lateral heel. Observation on 02/26/20 at 12:15 P.M. with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) of the right lateral heel dressing change for Resident #214 revealed after removing the old dressing and cleaning the wound, the ADON placed the Resident #214's uncovered right heel on the bed. The ADON left the room to check the dressing change order, returned to the room, completed hand hygiene, and paced a dressing over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366305. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.