Rosary Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 68.9 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.53 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure staff practiced appropriate hand hygiene during meal service and ensured food was free from contamination. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except Resident #1 who was identified to not eat food by mouth. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Observations on 01/07/25, beginning at 3:56 P.M., revealed [NAME] #182 taking temperatures of food items before meal service. [NAME] #182 wore disposable gloves while touching the thermometer, serving utensils, a pen and paperwork, lids covering food items, and then picked up a pork chop with his left hand and inserted the thermometer into the pork chop. [NAME] #182 determined the temperature was not adequate and touched three additional pork chops before determining the food temperature was adequate. Interview on 01/07/25 at 4:05 P.M., with [NAME] #182 confirmed he touched multiple surfaces with his disposable gloves before touching ready-to-eat pork chops. Observation and interview on 01/07/25 at approximately 4:07…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-09 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician and within prescribed time frames, resulting in delay in administration of anticonvulsant medication, anti-diabetic medication, anti-dementia medication and anti-psychotic medication. This affected four (#12, #36 #40, #66 ) of eight residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Observation on 01/07/25 at 7:27 A.M., noted Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #130 to obtain Resident #12 medications from the medication cart. LPN #130 stated Lamotrigine 200 milligrams (mg) was not available in the facility or in the contingency box supply. The medication would have to be omitted and ordered from the pharmacy. LPN #130 proceeded to Resident #12 room and administered the available medications. Review of the medical record revealed a physician order dated 04/05/22 for the administration of Lamotrigine one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to doff and appropriately store soiled personal protective equipment (PPE). This had the potential to affect all 23 residents on the second floor (#2, #3, #5, #10, #14, #15, #19, #22, #23, #24, #27, #29, #35, #36, #44, #51, #56, #62, #64, #66, #67, #70, and #71). The facility census was 71. Findings include: Observation on 01/06/25 at approximately 10:45 A.M., revealed Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #116 removing PPE in the doorway of Resident #10's room and placing it in a trash can located in the hallway outside Resident #10's room. Concurrent interview with CNA #116 confirmed Resident #10 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and required staff to wear PPE while providing personal care. CNA #116 further confirmed the process was to remove PPE in the doorway and place in a trash can located in the hallway outside of the room. Observation on 01/06/25 at 2:48 P.M., revealed a trash can outside Resident #36's room. Concurrent interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #160 confirmed Resident #36 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to notify the family when a resident experienced a change in condition requiring a medication change. This affected one (#62) of one resident reviewed for notification of changes. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the electronic medical record for Resident #62 revealed an admission date of 05/31/24, with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypertension (HTN), other post-traumatic urethral stricture, chronic kidney disease (CKD), hyperkalemia, heart failure, diverticulum of bladder, acidosis, anxiety, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, atrial fibrillation (a. fib), hypothyroidism, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, generalized muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, cognitive communication deficit, oral dysphagia, and difficulty in walking. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were taken as self-administration assessments and according to policy. This affected two (#18 and #38) of two residents reviewed for self medication administration. The facility identified four residents participating in self medication administration in a facility census of 71. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses including: transient cerebral ischemic attack, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, osteoporosis, atrial flutter, chronic rhinitis and low back pain. Review of the most current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], assessed Resident #18 with minimal hearing difficulty, highly impaired vision, intact cognition, utilized a walker for mobility, independent with activities of daily living, received scheduled pain medications, and received an anti-platelet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered by the physician, and within prescribed time frames, resulting in a medication error rate above five percent (%). A total of 2 medication errors were observed out of 32 opportunities for a medication administrations calculating an error rate of 6.25%. This affected two (#12, #40) of three residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 71. Findings include: 1. Observation on 01/07/25 at 7:27 A.M., noted Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #130 to obtain Resident #12 medications from the medication cart. LPN #130 stated Lamotrigine 200 milligrams (mg) was not available in the facility or in the contingency box supply. The medication would have to be omitted and ordered from the pharmacy. LPN #130 proceeded to Resident #12 room and administered the available medications. Review of the medical record revealed a physician order dated 04/05/22 for the administration of Lamotrigine one 200 mg tablet twice daily for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, fall investigation review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff members exercised care and caution around residents following a fall incident and failed to ensure fall incidents were thoroughly and accurately investigated. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 69. Findings Included: Review of Resident #1's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/26/23. Diagnoses included cellulitis of the left lower limb, sepsis with septic shock, non-pressure chronic ulcer of the left calf with fat layer exposed, contusion of left lower limb, acute kidney failure, coronary artery disease and respiratory failure. Review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was assessed with intact cognition, required a substantial/maximum assist for all transfers, and required oxygen therapy at all times. Review of Resident #1's most recent care plan revealed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-10-06 · tag F0569 — pattern
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident account list review and business office file review and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify a resident when their personal funds account balance was within two hundred dollars of the state allowed limit. This affected five (#15, #23, #26, #39 and #47) of five residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus, type II and hypertension. Review of the resident account list revealed a balance of $2,348.08. Review of the business office file revealed no evidence a spend down letter was issued to Resident #15, or their representative as required. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included heart failure, mitral valve insufficiency, osteoarthritis, hypertension, muscle weakness, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of safety data sheets, review of facility list, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure potentially hazardous chemicals were securely stored in the second floor kitchen area. This had the potential to affect four (#12, #14, #15 and #40) residents identified by the facility as cognitively impaired and independently mobile residing on the second floor. Additionally, the facility failed to fall interventions were in place as care planned for fall precautions. This affected one (#32) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Observation on 10/05/22 at 11:10 A.M., of the second floor kitchenette revealed, in the unlocked cabinet under the kitchen sink, germicidal cleaner and disinfectant spray bottle containing approximately 15 ounces of the cleaner. The bottle had a warning label to avoid contact with eyes; in case of contact, immediately flush with plenty of water; if irritation develops, get…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled, dated and stored in accordance with professional standards for food services safety. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility except two (#61 and #65) residents who were identified as receiving no food by mouth. The facility census was 66. Findings include: 1. Observations and concurrent interview with Dietary Director #484 on 10/03/22 at 8:42 A.M., revealed an open box of hamburgers in the freezer with the plastic bag open to air. Further observations revealed a bag of salami dated 09/01/22, a bag of turkey lunch meat dated 09/14/22, a bag of hot dogs dated 09/22/22, and a bag of sliced ham lunch meat dated 09/26/22. Interview at that time, with the Dietary Director #484 confirmed the lunch meat and hot dogs had been opened and should have been discarded within seven days of the date written on the bag. 2. Observation and concurrent interview on 10/05/22 at 11:05 A.M., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #429 revealed the refrigerator on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH