St Francis Senior Ministries

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 46 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 51.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-04-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the facility was adequately maintained. This had the potential to affect all 52 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 52. Findings include: • Observation on 04/10/25 from 8:09 A.M. through 9:05 A.M., during an environmental tour with the Administrator, revealed the following: • Outside the main elevator on the first floor, and continued down the hallway and into the dining room, were damaged and improperly fitted ceiling tiles. • Multiple ceiling tiles in the first floor dining hall, near the solarium opening, had dried water stains. • On the second floor, outside the main elevator and down the south hall (200-220 unit), and continued down the west hall (221-239 unit), were multiple water stained, damaged, and improperly fitted ceiling tiles. • On the first-floor memory care unit, fluorescent light ballast covers contained dirt and debris, including perished bugs and flies, and several covers were cracked with partially broken covers throughout both south and east halls. Concurrent interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, review of the facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the facility's abuse policy related to immediate reporting of allegations of abuse to the Administrator. This affected one (#32) of one resident reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 52. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/28/23. Diagnoses including phantom limb syndrome with pain, chronic respiratory failure, and acquired absence of left leg above the knee. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/21/25, revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating Resident #32 was cognitively intact. Review of the facility submitted SRI, created 01/26/25, revealed on 01/25/25, Resident #32 reported to Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #310 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #315 that at approximately 1:30 A.M., an unidentified staff member used force while applying cream to his left lower extremity…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-03-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and review of facility documentation, the facility failed to ensure facility daily staffing included a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight hours during a 24-hour period. This had the potential to affect all 79 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's staffing schedules between 03/06/23 and 03/12/23 revealed the facility did not have a RN for eight hours in the 24-hour period on Sunday 03/12/23. Interview on 03/13/23 at 2:56 P.M. with the Administrator revealed the facility's staffing schedules were reviewed and the Administrator confirmed the facility lacked RN coverage for the entire day on 03/12/23 during a 24-hour period. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00140552.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were kept secured and out of reach of cognitively impaired and independently mobile residents. This affected one resident (#327) and had the potential to affect four additional residents who were cognitively impaired and independently mobile (#29, #49, #68, and #177) on the two-east hall. The facility census was 79. Findings Include: Observation on 03/15/23 at 4:07 P.M. revealed a medication cart located on two east was unlocked and unattended with loose pills in a clear plastic medication cup on top of the medication cart. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #373 was approximately eight feet from the medication cart with his back turned toward the medication cart talking and joking with a resident and their family. Observation at this time, also revealed a cognitively impaired, independently mobile resident, Resident #177, seated in a recliner approximately four feet from the unlocked, unattended medication cart with loose pills in a medication cup on the top of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident and staff interview, record review, observation of meal service, review of the facility menu, recipe review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who received pureed meals from the second floor kitchen received the correct serving sizes. This affected five (#20, #24, #33, #36, and #177) of five residents who received pureed meals on the second floor. In addition, the facility failed to follow the approved menu and recipe during meal service. This affected all residents except 14 (#5, #12, #15, #20, #24, #33, #36, #59, #60, #64, #68, #177, #179, and #180) identified by the facility as not having the food items for which the recipe was not followed. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of a facility document titled 2022 Fall/Winter Menus, undated, revealed the pureed lunch meal consisted of a number eight scoop of beef burgundy, a number eight scoop of egg noodles, and a number twelve scoop of key west vegetable blend for 03/13/23. Observation on 03/13/23 at 11:30 A.M. of meal service in the second floor dining…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were served meals palatable to taste and temperature. This had the potential to affect all residents except nine residents (#20, #24, #33, #36, #59, #60, #64, #68, and #177) who received alternative meals or were on a pureed diet. The facility census was 79. Findings include Interview on 03/13/23 at 9:59 A.M. with Resident #54 revealed the facility food was served cold. Interview on 03/13/23 at 12:36 P.M. with Resident #1 stated the food was cold sometimes. Resident #1 further stated staff would put hot food on cold plates. Observation on 03/13/23 at 4:25 P.M. revealed [NAME] #349 took the temperature of the pizza and the garlic bread. The pizza was 167 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the garlic bread was 187 degrees F. Observation and interview on 03/13/23 at 4:40 P.M. of dinner service revealed [NAME] #349 was plating meals. Further observation revealed the plate warmer was not on. [NAME] #349 verified the plate warmer was not on. [NAME] #349 then flipped the plate warmer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility guideline, the facility failed to notify the physician when a resident tested positive for COVID-19 and when a resident sustained an abrasion. This affected two residents (#6 and #7) of two residents reviewed for notification of change. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/04/21. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), atherosclerotic heart disease, and congestive heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 was cognitively intact. Review of a nursing progress note dated 02/04/23 revealed Resident #6 requested a COVID-19 test due to symptoms of cough, dry eyes, and congestion. The COVID-19 swab was positive. Further review Resident #6's progress notes and medical record from 02/04/23 through 02/06/23 revealed no documentation of physician notification of Resident #6's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the resident's care plans were revised and updated with current interventions to address their care needs. This affected two (Residents #35 and #71) of 19 residents reviewed for care plan revisions. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #71's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/17/22. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease. Review of Resident #71's physician orders revealed an order dated 12/06/22 for a silent alarm to be in place at all times on day and night shift. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 was rarely or never understood. Resident #71 had a bed alarm and chair alarm that were used daily. Review of Resident #71's care plan revised 02/15/23 revealed supports and interventions for self-care deficit, impaired cognitive function, and risk for falls. Fall interventions included anticipate needs and call light in reach. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for assistance received assistance with shaving and nail care. This affected one (#60) of one residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility identified 73 residents who required assistance from staff with bathing and 70 residents who required assistance with dressing. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed a re-admission date of 02/23/22. Diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF), acquired absence of left leg above the knee, morbid obesity, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance from staff with dressing, and personal hygiene. Resident #60 had no refusals of care during the review period.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's guideline and policy, the facility failed to ensure interventions were implemented timely to promote wound healing and prevent further skin injury. This affected one (Resident #7) of one resident for non-pressure related skin issues. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease stage, lymphedema, type II diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), non-pressure chronic ulcer lower extremities, edema, morbid obesity, neuropathy, chronic embolism and thrombosis right popliteal vein. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had intact cognition, independent with activities of daily living, utilized a walker and wheelchair for locomotion, was at risk for pressure ulcer development, and had four venous and arterial ulcers involving…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CSJ INITIATIVES — 2 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes:

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH