Merit House LLC
4645 Lewis Ave, Toledo, OH 43612 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (419) 478-5131 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.7% | 5.3% | 15.4% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.0% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 19.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.0% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.5% | 25.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.7% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.8% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.5% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.8% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 74.2% | 75.6% | 79.4% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.34 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.61 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
39.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 39.7%CMS range 27.4–51.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.3–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.2%CMS range 5.2–16.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 84.0 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.16 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a functioning call system. This affected 18 (Resident #7,#13,#19,#15,#10,#26,#43,#32,#6,#4,#63,#57,#64,#33,#73,#5,#14,#31) out of 18 residents who resided on the 400 and 500 hallway. Additionally, the facility failed to provide timely care to residents who did not have a functioning call system. This affected one (Resident #33) of three reviewed for timely care. The facility census was 73.Findings Included:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #33 revealed an admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, muscle spasms of back, and muscle weakness.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05. Additional review of the MDS revealed Resident #33 had impairment on one side, used a wheelchair, and required substantial assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on review of electronic mail (email) correspondence, staff interview and review of the facility investigation, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were certified by qualified staff. This affected 40 (#43, #66, #74, #63, #75, #44, #77, #15, #80, #81, #82, #83, #84, #85, #86, #87, #88, #89, #90, #91, #92, #93, #94, #95, #96, #97, #98, #99, #100, #101, #102, #103, #104, #105, #106, #107, #108, #109, #110, and #111) residents identified by the facility as having MDS assessments completed by an unqualified staff. The facility census was 78.Findings include:Review of email correspondence from 01/12/26 through 01/29/26 between the Administrator and the Ohio Board of Nursing (OBN) revealed the facility identified that former Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #825 certified 64 MDS assessments as the Registered Nurse (RN) MDS Coordinator. Interview on 04/23/26 at 9:26 A.M. with the Administrator revealed in January 2026, she noticed LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-28 · tag F0729 — widespreadVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, personnel file review, and policy review revealed the facility failed to ensure personnel obtained the proper registry. This affected one (#101) of four Certified Nursing Assistant personnel files reviewed. This had the ability to affect all residents. The facility census was 84.Findings include:Observation on 01/27/26 at 11:07 A.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #101 was assisting Resident #15 in morning care which involved dressing and positioning in the wheelchair.Review of CNA #101's personnel file revealed a hire date of 08/22/25.Review of CNA #101's Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program was completed on 06/13/25. Review of CNA #101's personnel file and the State of Ohio State Tested Nursing Assistant website revealed it was absent of proof of State Registry.Review of the facility staffing schedule revealed CNA #101 worked as a CNA on 01/27/26 and 01/28/26. Interview with CNA #101 on 01/27/26 at 11:52 A.M. revealed she was employed at a CNA and was caring for residents that day.Interview with the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure narcotic pain medications were administered as ordered. This affected one (#11) of three residents reviewed for narcotic pain medication use. The facility census was 84. Findings include:Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/16/26. Diagnoses included nondisplaced fracture of right humerus subsequent encounter, morbid obesity, fall subsequent encounter, fracture of first and second lumbar vertebra, anxiety disorder, and alcohol use.Review of Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed an admission MDS was in progress.Review of Resident #11's Baseline Care Plan dated 01/17/26 revealed was alert and aware. Resident #11 plan was to complete physical and occupational therapy to increase strength and stamina and discharge home. While at the facility the nursing staff would provide nursing care as ordered to reach optimal health status. Resident #11 had indicators of pain and a goal was in place for adequate pain control. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0774 — isolatedHelp the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents were transported to appointments as scheduled. This affected one (#11) of three residents reviewed for transportation to outside appointments. The facility census was 84.Findings include:Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/16/26. Diagnoses included nondisplaced fracture of right humerus subsequent encounter, morbid obesity, fall subsequent encounter, fracture of first and second lumbar vertebra, anxiety disorder, and alcohol use.Review of Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed an admission MDS was in progress.Review of Resident #11's Baseline Care Plan dated 01/17/26 revealed the resident was alert and aware. Resident #11's plan was to complete physical and occupational therapy to increase strength and stamina and discharge home. While at the facility the nursing staff would provide nursing care as ordered to reach optimal health status, therapy would provide therapy services as ordered to reach optimal function,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in a safe and secure manner. This had the potential to affect all 81 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 81.Findings include:Observation on 12/02/25 at 7:55 A.M. revealed an unattended and unlocked medication cart located in the hallway outside of room [ROOM NUMBER].Interview on 12/02/25 at 7:56 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #126 confirmed the medication cart was unattended and unlocked. Continued interview with LPN #126 stated the medication cart should be locked when no staff are attending the cart.Review of an undated facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, revealed medications would be stored in locked compartments.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided opportunities and assistance with voting. This affected three (#4, #7 and #47) of three residents reviewed for voting, with the potential to affect all residents except one (#69) identified by the facility as voting by absentee ballot. The facility census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 04/03/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was cognitively intact. Interview on 01/27/25 at 3:21 P.M. with Resident #4 revealed the facility did not provide assistance or opportunities for her to vote in recent elections and it was important to her to vote. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 04/25/22. Diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain a dignified dining experience for the residents by serving meals on disposable dishware. This had the potential to affect 79 of 81 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#2 and #34) who received no food from the kitchen. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Observation on 12/26/24 at 1:15 P.M. of lunch trays being picked up by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #502 revealed desserts for all of the trays were served in a Styrofoam bowl. Interview at the time of the observation with CNA #502 verified the desserts were served in a Styrofoam bowl. Further interview with CNA #501 revealed meals were sometimes served in Styrofoam containers. Observation on 12/26/24 at 4:54 P.M. of the dinner meal service revealed the meal was served to residents in a disposable, clear and green, carryout container. Interview on 12/26/24 at 4:55 P.M. with [NAME] #425 verified dinner was served in disposable carryout containers and further stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-31 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, review of the facility menu and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow established menus and further failed to maintain a substitution log. This had the potential to affect 79 of 81 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#2 and #34) who received no nutrition from the kitchen. The facility census was 81. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility menu cycle revealed the facility was on a five-week rotation for the winter menu. Further review of the menu revealed for week five, day five (12/26/24), the menu for breakfast was choice of cereal, scrambled eggs, bacon, wheat toast, jelly, butter, juice of choice, milk, and coffee or tea. Observation on 12/26/24 at 7:48 A.M. of the breakfast trayline revealed the meal consisted of two slices of french toast, two sausage links and hot cereal. The cereal was served from a white handled scoop. Concurrent interview with [NAME] #471 verified the breakfast served was french toast, sausage links, cereal of choice and beverage of choice and not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, observation, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete dressing changes according to physician orders. This affected one (#30) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 12/06/24. Diagnoses included status post cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus type two, and congestive heart failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/12/24, revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact and was admitted with no unhealed pressure or vascular ulcers. Review of a nursing progress note dated 12/27/24 revealed Resident #30 had an intact purple area noted to the right heel during her shower. A physician order was obtained to apply skin prep to the right heel, cover with abdominal (ABD) pad and wrap with kerlix for protection, to be done twice daily and as needed, and apply offloading heel boot. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, medical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for administration of oxygen therapy. This affected one (#30) of three residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility identified 18 residents who received oxygen therapy. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 12/06/24. Diagnoses included status post cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and congestive heart failure. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/12/24, revealed Resident #30 was cognitively intact and received oxygen therapy. Review of the physician orders for December 2024 revealed no order for oxygen therapy. Observation on 12/30/24 at 4:32 P.M. of Resident #30 revealed she was wearing oxygen via nasal cannula, running at two liters per minute (lpm). Concurrent interview with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, review of the emergency medication box (E-box) inventory and review of facility policy, the facility failed to administer medications per physician order. This affected one (#100) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #100 revealed an admission date of 12/06/24 and a discharge date of 12/18/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, and anxiety. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/13/24, revealed Resident #100 was cognitively intact. Review of the admission orders for Resident #100 revealed he was ordered Zithromax (antibiotic) 250 milligrams (mg) to give two tablets on day one for acute exacerbation of COPD and prednisone (oral steroid used to decrease inflammation) 20 mg to give one and a half tablets (30 mg total) for acute exacerbation of COPD. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for December 2024 revealed on 12/07/24 a code…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure soiled bedpans were cleaned and disinfected timely. This affected one (#22) of one resident reviewed for bedpan use. The facility identified eight additional residents who utilized bedpans. The facility census was 81. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 03/01/24. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis, congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation, and hypertension with heart disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/07/24, revealed Resident #22 was frequently incontinent and was staff dependent for toileting. Review of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) documentation for the past 30 days revealed Resident #22 was both continent and incontinent. Observation on 12/26/24 at 8:45 A.M. of Resident #22's bathroom revealed a soiled bedpan on the floor of the bathroom. There was a pink substance on the bottom of the bedpan and the bedpan was left, uncovered, in the open. Concurrent interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered. This affected one (#93) of three residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 83. Findings included: Review of Resident #93's medical record revealed an admission ate of 10/02/24. Diagnoses included cellulitis of the left lower extremity, diabetes mellitus, ulcerative colitis, and schizophrenia. The resident was discharged on 10/09/24. Review of Resident #93's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an intact cognitive function and was independent of most activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of Resident #93's nursing progress note dated 10/02/24 revealed the resident arrived to the facility at 2:00 P.M. from a local hospital. The resident's medications were reviewed and confirmed with the physician. Review of Resident #93's physician orders while in the facility included orders dated 10/02/24 for atorvastatin calcium…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of exterminator documents, and policy review, the facility failed maintain a pest free environment. This affected one (#84) of two residents reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility census was 83. Findings included: Review of Resident #84's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/01/20. Diagnoses included mild intellectual disabilities, congestive heart failure, and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #84's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had an intact cognition and was at risk for skin impairment related to weakness. Review of Resident #84's nursing progress note dated 10/08/24 revealed the resident was showered and staff noticed small bug bites all over the resident's legs and arms. The nurse practitioner was notified. Review of Resident #84's nursing progress note dated 10/11/24 revealed the resident was showered with assistance from a nurse aide and bite marks on her bilateral upper and lower extremities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of staff schedules, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of verbal abuse and failed to protect residents from potential abuse. This affected three (Resident #9, #42, and #54) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified the resident as cognitively impaired. The resident required substantial/maximal assistance from staff for a majority of the activities of daily living. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence regarding an allegation of abuse. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of a facility investigation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment free from an outdoor fire. This had the potential to affect 11 residents (#5, #9, #14, #34, #38, #42, #46, #54, #61, #77, #181) with rooms in proximity to where the fire occurred. The facility census was 85. Findings include Review of an incident summary dated 09/13/24 about 3:50 P.M. by the Administrator revealed a nurse stated there was smoke outside of the 200 Hall lounge exit door on the sidewalk. When the Administrator arrived, there was a small flowerpot under a chair that staff put dirt and water on because it was smoking. There were no residents or staff witnessed sitting in the chair which had a hole. The Administrator reviewed the camera footage but the area was not in view of the camera. Observation on 09/16/24 at 3:15 P.M., with the Director of Maintenance (DM) #416 revealed a red fabric patio chair near the southwest doorway of the interior courtyard with a burn hole in the seat of the chair approximately six inches by four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary services to maintain a dignified appearance. This affected one (Resident #62) of three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, gout, hypertension, and type II diabetes mellitus. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #62 had a moderate cognitive impairment. The resident was dependent on staff assistance for dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the physician progress notes dated 01/17/24 and 03/12/24 revealed Resident #62's right breast was surgically absent and an order for a prosthetic bra per patient request. Review of the social service progress notes dated 03/14/24 revealed Resident #62…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #182 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included chronic destructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and heart failure. Review of the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #182 was cognitively intact. The resident required partial to moderate assistance from staff for bed mobility. Review of the physician orders for September 2024 identified an active order dated 09/05/24 for top bilateral siderails to aide in bed mobility and promote independence. Review of the plan of care dated 09/07/24 identified Resident #182 was at risk for an activities of daily living self-care performance deficit related to limited mobility. Interventions included half rails up as per physician orders for safety during care provision, to assist with bed mobility, and to observe for injury or entrapment related to siderail use. During an interview on 09/18/24, Resident #182's family member reported the resident was admitted to the facility weeks ago and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician of resident weight loss. This affected one (Resident #48) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #48 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included severe protein-calorie malnutrition, nutritional deficiency, heart disease, heart failure, weakness, anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact. The resident was noted as having weight gain. Review of the plan of care revised 08/15/24 revealed Resident #48 was at risk for decline in nutrition/hydration status related to diagnoses, weight loss, and inadequate nutrition. The resident had weight gain over the past month, likely related to fluid retention, and also reported increased intakes while at the hospital. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This affected one (Resident #19) of one resident observed for room cleanliness. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 04/11/24, with diagnoses that include cerebral infarction, hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes (DM2), bipolar disorder, nutritional deficiency, hypertension (HTN), seborrheic dermatitis, unspecified intellectual disabilities, personal history of COVID-19, tinea unguium. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Observation on 09/16/24 at 3:14 P.M. of the restroom sink in Resident #19's restroom revealed it contained a brown liquid that filled to approximately four inches from the top of the sink, and was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse to the state agency in a timely manner. This affected three (Resident #9, #42, and #54) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. The resident required substantial/maximal assistance from staff for a majority of the activities of daily living. Review of the medical record revealed no evidence regarding an allegation of abuse. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cardiomyopathy, depression, hypertension, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0635 — isolatedProvide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure admission orders were obtained to provide care and treatment to a resident with a surgical incision. This affected one (#178) of one resident identified with a surgical incision. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #178 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included occlusion and stenosis of left carotid artery, anesthesia of skin, paresthesia of skin, polyneuropathy, hyperlipidemia, and depression. Review of the hospital record dated 09/13/24 revealed Resident #178 was discharged with the recommendation to wash the surgical incision twice daily with soap and water. Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #178 was cognitively intact and utilized a walker for ambulation. The resident had a 6.5 centimeter surgical incision on his neck. Observation on 09/16/24 at 10:01 A.M. revealed Resident #178 had several…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of facility policy, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to provide grooming services for a resident. This affected one resident (Resident #20) of three residents observed for ADLs. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 10/22/24 with diagnoses of polyosteoarthritis, acute respiratory failure, type two diabetes, asthma, pulmonary embolism, metabolic encephalopathy, schizoaffective disorder, stage four chronic kidney disease, major depressive disorder, nutritional deficiency, anxiety, bipolar disorder, hypothyroidism, restless osteoarthritis, and hypertension. Review of the most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, indicating Resident #20 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of the MDS revealed that Resident #20 required substantial or maximal assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to assist with vision services in a timely manner. This affected two (#32, #46) of two residents reviewed for vision services. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 03/18/24. Diagnoses included dementia, epilepsy, anxiety and atrial fibrillation. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had adequate vision with no corrective lenses. Review of the medical record revealed no documentation Resident #32 had seen the provider for vision services. Review of a Request for Service form dated 06/13/24 revealed the resident had requested dental, eye care, and podiatry services. Review of facility documentation revealed the eye physician was last in the facility on 09/16/24. Interview on 09/16/24 at 10:55 A.M., Resident #32 stated since his admission, he had told many staff members he needed to see an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary supplements were administered per the physician's order. This affected one (#48) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #48 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included severe protein-calorie malnutrition, nutritional deficiency, heart disease, heart failure, weakness, anxiety, depression, and bipolar disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact. Review of the plan of care revised 08/15/24 revealed Resident #48 was at risk for decline in nutrition/hydration status related to diagnoses, weight loss, and inadequate nutrition. The resident had weight gain over the past month, was likely related to fluid retention, and also reported increased intakes while at the hospital. Interventions included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record, review of physician orders, review of medication administration records, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per physician orders. This affected one (#77) of six residents reviewed for medications. The facility census was 85. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 09/09/24. Diagnoses included fracture of the left femur, type two diabetes mellitus, bipolar disorder, and epilepsy. Review of a physician order dated 09/10/24 revealed the resident was ordered lactulose oral solution 10 grams/15 milliliters (ml), give 45 ml by mouth three times a day for chronic hepatic failure. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 09/09/24 through 09/19/24 revealed the resident had not received two doses of the lactulose per physician orders on 09/12/24 and had not received one dose on 09/13/24. Review of the medication orders administration note dated 09/12/24 at 12:30 P.M. revealed the lactulose medication not available and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders resulting in a medication error rate of five percent. 37 medications were observed with two medication errors, resulting in a medication error rate of five percent. This affected one (#17) of two residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 85. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 07/17/24. Diagnoses included malignant neoplasm of breast, type two diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. Review of the physician order dated 07/18/24 revealed orders for fluticasone propionate suspension 50 micrograms/actuation (mcg/act), one spray in each nostril in the morning for allergic rhinitis. Review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to utilize proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for a resident positive for COVID-19. This affected one (Resident #4) of one resident observed for COVID-19 precautions. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 12/26/24 with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pseudo-bulbar affect (PBA), type two diabetes (DM2), anxiety disorder, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, major depressive disorder, and hyperlipidemia. Observation on 09/16/24 at 10:41 A.M. revealed a COVID-19 isolation cart present outside of the room of Resident #4. Resident #4 was positive for COVID-19. The door to Resident #4's room was open. Further observation of State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #503 revealed she doffed her gown and gloves in Resident #4's room exited the room wearing the surgical mask that she wore while in Resident #4's room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-23 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility electronic medical record, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to residents were educated on and received the COVID-19 vaccination. This affected two residents (Resident #332 and Resident #46) of five residents reviewed. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 03/18/24. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating Resident #32 was cognitively intact. Further review of the medical record revealed no documentation of education of administration or refusal of the COVID-19 vaccination. Interview on 09/19/24 at 3:09 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #484 revealed the facility had no documented of education of administration or refusal of the COVID-19 vaccine for Resident #32. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 03/01/24. Review of the most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to manage soiled and clean linen to potentially prevent cross-contamination. This had the potential to affect 54 of 54 residents who utilized laundry services at the facility. The facility census was 54. Findings included: Observation on 04/27/22 at 7:35 A.M., of the laundry area revealed laundry was located in the basement of the facility. There was one room for folding and hanging clean linen and a separate room where the washers and dryers were located. Interview on 04/27/22 at 7:38 A.M., of Housekeeper (HK) #581 revealed all laundry was transported down the stairway to the laundry rooms. Soiled linens were placed into the washers, dried, and then transported into a separate room to be folded. HK #581 stated since the facility did not have an elevator, staff had to carry armfuls of clean linen up the stairs to place on carts for delivery to resident care areas. Observation on 04/27/22 at 8:36 A.M., of laundry delivery revealed HK #725 pick up a stack of clean towels and hold them against…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-28 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, staff and resident interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to allow residents to make their own choices related to food options at meals. This affected five (#14, #28, #31, #40 and #45) of five residents interviewed and expressed concerns over the lack of food choices being offered. The census was 54. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #14 revealed an admission date of 06/29/17, with diagnoses including: nutritional deficiency, chronic heart failure, and a history of COVID-19. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #14 was cognitively intact. Interview on 04/25/22 at 7:33 P.M.,with Resident #14 stated in the past, dietary aides came to the resident's rooms to offer meal options, but they no longer offered those options. Interview on 04/26/22 at 2:33 P.M., with Dietary Manager #747 verified dietary aides used to bring the menu of alternate options around to residents but due to the COVID-19 pandemic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-04-28 · tag F0570 — patternAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the resident trust account balances, review of the surety bond, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the surety bond was sufficient to cover the total of resident trust accounts held at the facility. This affected 30 (#1, #3, #4, #6, #7, #8, #10, #13, #14, #16, #17, #18, #20, #21, #22, #23, #25, #28, #29, #30, #31, #35, #38, #40, #43, #44, #45, #48, and #49) of 30 residents identified by the facility as having a resident trust account. The facility census was 54. Findings included: Review of the resident trust account balances, dated 04/25/22, revealed the total of resident trust accounts, including the assisted living facility, totaled $51,050.65. Thirty (#1, #3, #4, #6, #7, #8, #10, #13, #14, #16, #17, #18, #20, #21, #22, #23, #25, #28, #29, #30, #31, #35, #38, #40, #43, #44, #45, #48, and #49) facility residents were listed as having money in the resident trust account. Review of the surety bond, dated 06/16/20, revealed coverage in the amount of $50,000.00. Interview on 04/28/22 at 10:43 A.M., with the Business Office Manager (BOM) #550 verified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, medical record review, and review of a wheelchair cleaning schedule, the facility failed to ensure wheelchairs were maintained in a safe and comfortable manner. This affected one (#16) of three reviewed for environmental concerns. The facility identified 36 residents who utilized wheelchairs. The census was 54. Findings include: Review of Resident #16's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/09/19. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute kidney failure, rhabdomyolysis, congestive heart failure, and altered mental status. Review of the most recently completed Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #16 was assessed with moderately impaired cognition. Observation on 04/25/22 at 8:37 P.M., revealed Resident #16 was laying awake in bed, with his wheelchair located at the foot of the bed. Further observation of the wheelchair revealed the right arm rest was torn with foam padding exposed and hanging out the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete a significant change in status assessment. This affected one (#29) of 17 residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 54. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 03/12/18 and a readmission date of 02/11/22. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, protein calorie malnutrition, acute kidney failure, acute cystitis with hematuria, atrial fibrillation, morbid obesity, personal history of COVID-19, major depressive disorder, brief psychotic disorder, hypertension, [NAME] fever, malignant neoplasm of left breast, and malignant neoplasm of right breast. Review of the Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive two person assistance with transfers, dressing, toilet use. Additional review revealed a significant change in condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to revise resident's comprehensive care plans to accurately reflect services provided. This affected two (#29 and #26) of 17 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 03/12/18 and a readmission date of 02/11/22. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, protein calorie malnutrition, acute kidney failure, acute cystitis with hematuria, atrial fibrillation, morbid obesity, personal history of COVID-19, major depressive disorder, brief psychotic disorder, hypertension, [NAME] fever, malignant neoplasm of left breast, and malignant neoplasm of right breast. Review of the Medicare 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive two-person assistance with transfers, dressing, toilet use. Additional review revealed a significant change in condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, family and staff interviews, and review of policy, the facility failed to provide nail care to residents dependent for care. This affected one (#35) of 17 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 54. Finidngs include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 12/17/15. Diagnoses included dementia, heart failure, acute respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), kidney disease, schizoaffective disorder, heart disease, anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #35 was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the plan of care, initiated 12/24/15, revealed Resident #35 required supervision up to extensive assistance, with activities of daily living (ADLs) related to depression, muscle weakness, dementia, anxiety,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of job description, the facility failed to ensure clothing other than hospital gowns were obtained for daily wear for one (#140) out of one resident reviewed for choices. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #140 revealed an admission date of 05/09/19. Diagnoses included systolic and diastolic heart failure, altered mental status, hypertension, and benign lipomatous neoplasm of skin and subcutaneous tissue of unspecified limb. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 05/16/19, revealed Resident #140 had severe cognition impairment and it was very important to the resident to choose what clothes to wear. Random observations on 05/28/19, 05/29/19, and 05/30/19 revealed Resident #140 to be dressed in a hospital type gown and seated in a wheelchair or in his bed. Interview on 05/30/19 at 9:26 A.M., Resident #140 revealed he would like to have clothes to wear but has none. He denies anyone talking with him regarding clothes. He admits he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for two (#34 and #4) of 42 residents identified by the facility to utilize call lights. The facility census was 49. Findings include: 1. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, psychosis, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and morbid obesity. Review of the significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/06/19, revealed the resident had no cognitive deficits and was dependent on one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Review of the plan of care dated 05/01/19 noted the resident was incontinent of bowel and bladder. The interventions included to ask and encourage the resident to utilize the call light system to report the need to use the bathroom. Observation and interview on 05/28/19 at 11:01 A.M., Resident #34 asked the surveyor to get…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-30 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide residents and their representative(s) with written notice of the reason for the discharge to three (#37, #39 and #28) of three residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 49. Finding include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, peripheral vascular disease, neurogenic bladder, flexion contracture of left lower leg, and amputation right lower leg. Review of the medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for an infection. She returned to the facility on [DATE]. There was no evidence in the resident's medical record indicating the resident and her representative were provided a written reason for the transfer to the hospital. Interview with Social Service Director (SSD) #220 on 05/28/19 at 2:00 P.M. she verified she did not give Resident #37 or her representative a written statement for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-05-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of the care conference documentation, the facility failed to hold care conferences with resident input for one (#2) out of three residents reviewed for care plan participation. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Review of the medical record of Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 08/13/18. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, iron deficiency anemia, diabetes mellitus, major depression and chronic pulmonary edema. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 02/20/19, revealed Resident #2 to have no cognitive deficit. Interview on 05/28/19 at 11:10 A.M., Resident #2 revealed she has not been invited nor has she attended a care plan conference since admission here. Review of the Care Plan Conference form for Resident #2, dated 03/28/19, revealed it to be blank except for the signatures on the last page. This was verified by the Director of Nursing at the time of review on 05/29/17 at 12:18 P.M. Interview on 05/29/19 at 2:35 P.M., Social Service Director (SSD) #220…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to address the use of signage to inform the public of a communicable disease requiring isolation and failed to provide signage for isolation for one resident (#19) of one resident reviewed for isolation. The facility identified one resident in the facility in isolation. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included intellectual disabilities, depression, schizoaffective disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, a history of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) infection, hypertension and anxiety. Review of the physician order dated 05/16/19 revealed an order for a urinalysis with a culture and sensitivity (UA C&S) due to blood tinged sediment noted in his urine. On 05/16/19 the antibiotic Macrobid 100 milligrams (mg) twice daily for ten days was ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-09-23 · tag F0730 — widespreadObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months. This affected two State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs #402 and #475) of four STNAs reviewed. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 85. Findings include: 1. Review of facility personnel records for STNA #402 revealed a hire date of 08/24/23. Further review revealed no 90-day or annual employee evaluations were present in her employee file. 2. Review of facility personnel records for STNA #475 revealed a hire date of 03/28/24. Further review revealed no 90-day employee evaluation was present in her employee file. Interview on 09/23/24 at 11:50 A.M. with Administrator #2 verified that there was no 90-day employee evaluation present for STNA #402 and STNA #475.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-02 for 62 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STONE, JODIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 50% | since 01/04/2013 |
| STONE, JOHN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 50% | since 01/04/2013 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $280K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365279. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.