Canterbury Of Twinsburg

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 71% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 46.9 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.33 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.16 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, review of video footage, review of facility investigation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were safely transferred using a Hoyer lift. Actual Harm occurred on 05/08/25 at approximately 2:15 P.M. when Hospice Nurse Aide (HNA) #869 completed a Hoyer lift (a type of mechanical lift used to safely transfer individuals with limited mobility from one surface to another) transfer of Resident #21 without the assistance of a second person, resulting in Resident #21's arm becoming fractured. Resident #21 required an x-ray examination which revealed a displaced (a bone fracture where the broken bone fragments are no longer in normal alignment), separated (the bone is broken in two or more places creating a separate segment of bone between breaks), overriding (the broken ends of a bone overlap causing shortening)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2022-06-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #36 did not develop avoidable pressure injuries of the knees. Actual harm occurred when Resident #36 developed a right knee deep tissue injury (Persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon or purple discoloration intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration due to damage of underlying soft tissue.) and a left knee Stage 3 pressure ulcer (Full-thickness loss of skin, in which subcutaneous fat may be visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and rolled wound edges are often present. Slough and/or eschar may be visible but do not obscure the depth of tissue loss.). This affected one resident (Resident #36) of three residents reviewed for pressure injuries. The census was 49. Findings include: Review of Resident #36's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/30/21 and diagnoses including senile degeneration of the brain, multiple fracture…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #27's call light was responded to in a reasonable amount of time. This affected one resident (#27) of three residents reviewed for call light response times. The facility census was 37. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #27 revealed an admission date of 06/09/24 with diagnoses including difficulty walking, anxiety, obsessive compulsive disorder, and urinary incontinence. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and required partial to moderate assistance from staff for toileting hygiene and substantial to maximum assistance for transfers. The assessment also indicated Resident #27 was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the alarm event report dated 11/07/24 through 11/14/24 revealed Resident #27's call light was pulled at 4:00 P.M. and cleared at 4:26 P.M. with the response time being 25 minutes and 35 seconds. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent a fall for Resident #8 who was completely dependent on staff for fall prevention. This affected one resident (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 37. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including persistent vegetative state, brain damage, lack of coordination, abnormal posture, and dementia. Review of physician order dated 12/05/19 revealed Resident #8's head of bed was to be up at a 30 degree angle. Review of physician orders dated 11/15/23 revealed Resident #8 had a camera in the room at the request of the Power of Attorney (POA). Review of a physician order dated 11/28/23 revealed Resident #8 was to be out of bed at 11 A.M. and back in bed at 5:00 P.M. Review of a physician order dated 08/05/24 revealed Resident #8 was a hospice resident due to anoxic brain damage. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices were implemented when Resident #10 was provided incontinence care. This affected one resident (Resident #10) of 37 residents observed for infection control. The facility identified 11 residents (Resident's #10, #12, #13, #14, #15, #17, #18, #25, #26, #30 and #40) as incontinent and residing on the nursing unit of Resident #10. The facility census was 37. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/23/23 and diagnoses included unilateral primary osteoarthritis right hip, muscle weakness, and chronic kidney disease. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact. Resident #10 required substantial to maximal assistance with toileting hygiene and bathing. Resident #10 was always incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, review of facility policy, review of the employee handbook, and review of photographs taken on a staff member's cell phone, the facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was treated with dignity and respect at all times. This affected one resident (#5) of four residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 41. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #5 revealed an admission date of 05/11/21 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, morbid obesity, muscle weakness, hypertension, adult failure to thrive, muscle spasm, chronic pain, hypothyroidism, and diabetes mellitus. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 04/17/24, revealed Resident #5 was cognitively intact. On 06/14/24 at 12:16 P.M., review of a unprompted text message after a telephone interview sent from State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #105's cell phone to the surveyor revealed she had taken a photograph of Resident #5 wearing a pink shirt, a brief, and no pants to show the surveyor she got the resident cleaned up. On 06/14/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI) 243880 and related investigation materials, the facility failed to ensure Resident #39 was treated with respect and dignity. This affected one (#39) of three residents reviewed. The facility census was 44. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 01/05/23 with diagnoses including heart failure, muscle weakness, scoliosis, spondylosis with myelopathy, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, cerebral infarction, and age-related osteoporosis. Review of the care plan, revised 08/01/23, revealed Resident #39 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). Interventions included cushion to wheelchair while out of bed, pendant call light which resident prefers to keep at bedside instead of wearing it, camera in room per Power of Attorney (POA) request, do not leave unattended in shower, and keep…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview, review of the facility's Self-Reported Incident (SRI) 243880 and related investigation materials, the facility failed to protect Resident #18 from abuse by a person who was impersonating a scheduled staffing agency worker. This affected one (#18) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 44. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 09/18/23 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and unspecified psychosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 12/19/23, revealed Resident #18 was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance or total dependence on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the behavior care plan, revised on 12/22/23, revealed Resident #18's son reported Resident #18 made up stories and had beliefs in false…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of facility policy, and review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance the facility failed to maintain and implement an effective infection prevention and control program to prevent the transmission of CRE (carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales), including proper personal protective equipment (PPE) was worn by staff when entering Resident #43's room who was on enhanced barrier isolation for CRE and failed to ensure staff discarded and changed soiled gloves appropriately after providing Resident #43's incontinence care. This had the potential to affect 19 residents (#2, #4, #5, #8, #11, #13, #14, #17, #21, #23, #24, #27, #30, #31, #32, #35, #36, #40, #41) residing on the nursing unit. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/24/23 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, dementia, right and left lumbago with sciatica, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure a State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #374 accused of staff to resident abuse towards Resident #43 was not immediately suspended pending the outcome of an investigation. This affected one resident (#43) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/24/23 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, dementia, right and left lumbago with sciatica and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of Resident #43's progress notes dated 08/13/23 at 9:09 P.M. included this nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #328, went in Resident #43's room with her aide (STNA #374) to find out why Resident #43 did not want STNA #374 to care for her. Resident #43 stated she did not want STNA #374 because she was [expletive] to her when she took care of her previously. LPN #328 told…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #43's allegation of staff-to-resident abuse was reported to the State Agency timely. This affected one resident (#43) out of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/24/23 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, dementia, right and left lumbago with sciatica, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of Resident #43's progress notes dated 08/13/23 at 9:09 P.M. included this nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #328, went in Resident #43's room with her aide, STNA #374, to find out why Resident #43 did not want STNA #374 to care for her. Resident #43 stated she did not want STNA #374 because she was [expletive] to her when she took care of her previously. LPN #328 told Resident #43 she was the nurse in the room when STNA #374 expressed that she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #43's weights were checked daily according to the physician's orders. This affected one resident (#43) out of three residents reviewed for weights. The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #43's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/24/23 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, heart failure, dementia, right and left lumbago with sciatica, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of Resident #43's physician's orders dated 07/25/23 revealed daily weight, one time a day for CHF (congestive heart failure). Review of Resident #43's weights dated 10/01/23 through 12/19/23 revealed there were eight daily weights (10/01/23, 10/21/23, 11/20/23, 11/23/23, 11/24/23, 11/30/23, 12/03/23 and 12/09/23) which were not documented as obtained according to the physician's orders. Review of Resident #43's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH