No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Momentous Health At Vandalia

208 North Cassel Road, Vandalia, OH 45377 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 118 certified beds · (937) 898-4202 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (937) 898-4202 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2023Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2023
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
600 Aviator Ct Ste 100 · (937) 208-7776 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Aptalis0.9 mi
845 Center Dr · (937) 264-8407 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.7 mi
780 Northwoods Blvd · (937) 264-2400 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(937) 898-5891 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
250 N Cassel Rd · (937) 454-0609

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased3.4%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.2%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms99.2%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.9%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.2%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.9%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.3%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.8%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.7%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine50.0%75.6%79.4%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.06U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 6.8–18.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.011.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
0.97
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.03
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
49.0%
Total nursing turnover
62.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 118 beds and averages 109.9 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.18 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-16)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to the resident had safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This affected seven Residents (#36 ,#60, #45, #46, #90, #91, and #95) out of seven residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 107.Findings include 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 05/01/26. Diagnoses included bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 had intact cognition as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This resident was independent with transfers and mobility. Observation of Resident #36's room on 06/03/26 at 12:17 P.M. revealed a very pervasive urine odor. During an interview on 06/03/26 at 12:18 P.M., Resident #36 stated her roommate (Resident #37) smelled of urine and refused to be changed. Resident #36 voiced her concerns related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policies the facility failed to implement interventions and provide sufficient supervision to prevent residents from ingesting foreign objects. This affected one (Resident #33) of three (#31, #33, #42) residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility also failed to ensure a clean and safe smoking area for the residents on the men's and women's secured unit. This had the potential to affect 19 Residents (#29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #35, # 39, #42, #50, #51, #52, #55, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, and #68) who the facility identified as smokers and utilized the outdoor smoking area. The facility also failed to ensure the secured unit was properly secured. The facility identified 41 Residents (#28, #29, #30,# 31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40. #41,#42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68) who resided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-08 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who had bed rails affixed to their beds were properly assessed and monitored for safety. This affected one (#42) out of three Residents (#31,#40, and #42) reviewed for bedrails. The facility identified a total of eleven Residents (#29, #30, #31, #34, #35, #38, #40, #41, #42, #46, and #48) who required assist bars on the secure unit. The facility census was 107.Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #42 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included conversion disorder with seizures, bipolar disorder, adult failure to thrive, major depressive disorder, hyperlipidemia, hypoglycemia, autistic disorder, cerebral aneurysm, aphasia, joint derangement. The Resident required hospice services. Review of the active care plan for Activity of Daily Living (ADL) assistance and falls for Resident #42 revealed intervention for bilateral assist bars to Resident #42 's to bed to assist and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-08 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure medical providers completed and signed their notes at the time of visit. This affected one (#45) of the three residents reviewed for provider visits. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 11/01/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), and type II diabetes mellitus (DM II).Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had severely cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero. Review of a physician progress note dated 04/07/26 for Resident #45 revealed the progress note was completed and signed on 06/03/26 at 11:42 A.M.During an interview on 06/03/26 at 10:29 A.M., Nurse Practitioner (NP) #200 verified she saw Resident #45 on 04/07/26 related to a hematoma to right shoulder but had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control measures were followed during incontinence care. This affected one (#45) of three residents reviewed for urinary incontinence. The facility census was 107.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 11/01/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), and type II diabetes mellitus (DM II).Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #45 had severely cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero. This resident was assessed to require partial assistance with eating, substantial assistance with toileting, bathing, and dressing, and setup with transfers. Review of section H for bowel and bladder of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 was frequently incontinent of bowel and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for the residents, staff and public. The affected all 45 residents housed on the East Unit. The facility census was 107. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 02/18/15. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorder Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #59 had severely cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero. Review of the medical record for Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 02/01/24. Diagnoses included obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, and dementia. Review of the Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #60 had intact cognition as evidenced by a BIMS score of 15 Observation of Resident #59 and #60's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-16 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure there was a Registered Nurse (RN) scheduled at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 108 residents. Findings include: Findings Include: Review of policy titled Staffing and dated 05/01/22 reveals that the facility should maintain adequate staffing on each shift to ensure resident's needs and services are met. Interview on 03/13/26 at 1:52 P.M. with Chief Operating Officer (COO) #400 confirmed the facility di not have a Registered Nurse(RN) on duty in the facility on 02/28/26. Review of the Minimum Direct Care Daily Average of 2.50 - Survey Tool dated from 02/27/26 through 03/05/26 revealed there was no RN coverage on 02/28/26.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policies the facility failed to implement interventions and provide sufficient supervision to prevent residents from ingesting foreign objects. This affected one (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for supervision. The facility also failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place. This affected one (Resident #7) of three residents reviewed for supervision. The facility also failed to ensure hazardous chemicals were secured. This had the potential to affect the following facility-identified cognitively impaired and independently mobile (Residents (#27, #44, #55, #59, and #80) on the 100 hall. The facility census was 108 residents. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 11/22/25 with diagnoses including pica, borderline personality disorder, bipolar, morbid obesity, and conversion disorder. Review of a nurse progress note for Resident #8 dated 12/17/25 at 7:04 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure current and accurate documentation of resident advanced directives were included in the medical record. This affected four (Residents #6, #24, # 27, # 65) of 32 residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 108 residents. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 08/29/24 with diagnoses including chronic pain syndrome, major depressive disorder, and bipolar disorder. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #24 revealed an order dated 03/12/25 for a code status of Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNRCC.) Review of the care plan for Resident dated 12/05/25 revealed the resident had a code status of DNRCC. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #24 dated 12/09/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the hard (physical) chart for Resident #24 revealed there was a sticker undated on the outside of the chart indicating the resident was a full code status. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to maintain resident rooms in good repair. This affected two (Residents #69 and #80) of 32 residents reviewed The facility census was 108 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission date on 12/11/25 with diagnoses including paranoid schizophrenia, presbyopia, and diabetes mellitus two. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #80 dated 12/26/25 revealed resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Observation on 03/09/26/26 at 5:02 P.M. of Resident #80's room revealed there were multiple small holes on the bedroom wall and the outside of the bathroom door had scratches and chipped paint. Interview on 03/09/26 at 5:02 P.M. with Resident #80 confirmed she did not like the holes on the bedroom wall and she felt the bathroom door with the scratches and chipped paint should be repaired. Interview on 03/16/26/26 at 9:18 A.M. with Maintenance Assistant (MA) #313 confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to address residents' identified needs. This affected three (Residents (#42, #9, and #8) of four residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 108 residents.Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 12/03/25 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, obstructive sleep apnea, and congestive heart failure. Review of the care plan for Resident #42 initiated 12/03/25 revised 12/31/25 revealed the resident was at risk for potential pain or discomfort. Further review of the care plan revealed it did not include interventions related to pain management. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #42 dated 01/07/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #42 revealed an order dated 01/19/26 for Voltaren gel to be applied to the right shoulder topically every six hours as needed for pain. Interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to reflect changes in toileting needs. This affected one (Resident #4) of four residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 108 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 11/02/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus type two, and acquired absence of right and left leg below knee. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #4 dated 12/16/25 revealed the resident did not have an indwelling catheter and was occasionally incontinent of urine. Review of care plan for Resident #4 dated 1/09/26 revealed the resident had indwelling foley catheter and requires catheter care per facility policy. Observation on 03/09/26 at 10:35 A.M. revealed Resident #4 was in bed and did not have a foley catheter. Interview on 3/16/26 at 10:59 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #307 confirmed the resident no longer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the medical record, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was administered as ordered by the physician. This affected one (Resident #2) of three residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. The facility census was 108 residents. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 08/11/25 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and respiratory failure. Review of the care plan for Resident #2 dated 08/11/25 revealed the resident was at risk for altered respiratory status, difficulty breathing, or potential for an alteration in respiratory status related to COPD. Interventions included provide oxygen per physician's order. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #2 dated March 2026 revealed there was no order for oxygen therapy. Observation on 03/10/26 at 1:48 PM revealed Resident #2 was receiving continuous oxygen therapy via nasal cannula per concentrator set at three liters per minute (LPM). Interview on 03/11/26 at 12:02 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility staff failed to provide pain management interventions as ordered by the physician and per resident request. This affected one (Resident #42) of six residents reviewed for pain management. The facility census was 108 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 12/03/25 with diagnoses including osteoarthritis, obstructive sleep apnea, and congestive heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #42 dated 01/07/26 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #42 revealed an order dated 01/19/26 for Voltaren gel to be applied to the resident's right shoulder topically every six hours as needed for pain. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #42 dated March 2026 revealed there was no record of administration of Voltaren gel on 03/07/26, 03/08/26, 03/09/26, and 03/10/26. Interview on 03/09/26 at 1:12 P.M. with Resident #42 confirmed he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of a facility emergency management plan, the facility failed to ensure there was an adequate amount of food available in the facility to account for scheduled meals and emergency situations. This had the potential to affect all 99 residents in the facility who the facility identified as receiving food from the kitchen. The census was 99. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen with [NAME] #59, on 12/03/24 at 8:31 A.M. through 8:44 A.M., revealed the facility's dry food storage consisted of dry pancake mix, dry cake mix, instant potatoes, noodles, onions, brown sugar, two canisters of oats, frosting, 11 cans of fruit, six cans of vegetables, and 25 pounds of rice. The refrigerated food storage consisted of one opened gallon of milk, two five-pound logs of cheese, one bag of broccoli, one bag of carrots, and an opened bottle of salad dressing. Observation of frozen food items in the kitchen consisted of two bags of peas and carrot mix and approximately 60 breakfast sausage links. Interview at time of the kitchen tour with [NAME]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, observations and policy review the facility failed to ensure prescription medications were appropriately stored in a secured manner. This had the potential to affect 17 residents (#69, #70, #73, #75, #78, #79, #80, #83, #85, #86, #88, #89, #91, #94, #95, #97 and #101) residing on the [NAME] Hall and eight resident (#6, #7, #11, #17, #21, #22, #23 and #29) residing on the East Hall who were cognitively impaired and independently mobile who could potentially access unsupervised and unsecured medications. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated medications were appropriately stored. This had the potential to affect 21 residents (#48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67 and #68) residing in the Northeast unit. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #82 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-08 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain the building in a safe homelike manner. This had the potential to affect the 21 residents (#48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #56, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67 and #68) residing in the Northeast Unit of the facility. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Observation on 10/07/24 at 1:55 P.M. of the facility roof revealed areas over the Northeast unit, facing the south had an area of splintered/missing wood with rain gutters not attached to the roof exposing the soffit and sagging. Further observation of the roof in the same area revealed multiple rows of shingles sagging between the roof rafters. Observation on 10/07/24 at 1:59 P.M. of the facility roof revealed two areas over the Northeast Unit, facing north had areas of splintered/missing wood with rain gutters not attached and sagging exposing the soffit and roofing shingles sagging between the rafters. Additionally, there was a large blue tarp present over the shingles in the same area. Observation on 10/08/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and resident and staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an adequate supply of paper towels and toilet paper for a resident's bathroom. This affected one (#84) out of three residents reviewed for the physical environment. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #84 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to synovitis, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, depression and schizophrenia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #84 dated 07/24/24 revealed an intact cognition. Resident #84 required supervision for eating, bed mobility and transfers. Resident #84 required moderate assistance with toileting. Interview on 10/08/24 at 8:10 A.M. with Housekeeper #21 stated the facility was out of toilet paper and paper towels today. Additionally, Housekeeper #21 stated that it happens often and they are just not ordering enough until the next order comes in.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-04 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of the online license verification system of the Bureau of Executives of Long-Term Services and Supports (BELTSS), review of the Administrator job description, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a licensed nursing home administrator (LNHA) with a valid license providing supervision and leadership to the facility. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 106 residents. Findings include: Review of the online license verification system for BELTSS at https://beltss.ohio.gov/licensing/license-lookup revealed Administrator #1 was issued an Ohio LNHA license on [DATE] with an expiration date of [DATE]. Review of the online license verification system for BELTSS at https://beltss.ohio.gov/licensing/license-lookup revealed Administrator #2 was issued an Ohio LNHA license on [DATE] with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure shower rooms were clean and ceilings were maintained. This had the potential to affect 60 (#44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73, #74, #75, #76, #77, #78, #79, #80, #81, #82, #83, #84, #85, #86, #87, #88, #89, #90, #91, #92, #93, #94, #95, #96, #97, #98, #99, #100, #101, #102 and #103) residents who receive showers in the [NAME] and Northeast shower rooms. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Interview with Resident #96 on 05/20/25 at 8:30 A.M. revealed the [NAME] shower room smelled like mold. Observation of facility on 05/20/24 at 8:35 A.M. revealed there was a black substance on the floor of the [NAME] shower room where the floor of the shower met the wall of the shower. There was also a black substance on the floor and caulk where the floor of the shower met the wall of the shower and a large round black spot on the ceiling of the shower in the Northeast shower room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate interventions and/or supervision to ensure a resident who was cognitively impaired with a history of wandering did not elope from the facility. This affected one (#53) out of three residents reviewed for elopements. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of Resident #53's chart revealed Resident #53 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cardiac arrest cause unspecified, major depressive disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, hypertension, encephalopathy, and malignant neoplasm of prostate. Review of Resident #53's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be moderately cognitively impaired and Resident #53 required set up assistance with eating, and oral hygiene. Resident #53…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2024-03-14 · tag F0839 — widespread
    Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of personnel files and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all licensed nursing staff had an active nursing license. This had the potential to affect all 96 residents residing in the facility. The census was 96. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Assistant Director of Nursing - Registered Nurse (ADON -RN) #34 revealed she was hired on [DATE], and the department was listed as Assistant DON-RN. Further review of the personnel file revealed no evidence ADON-RN #34's license was verified with the board of nursing upon hire. Review of the license verification provided by the facility for ADON-RN #34 dated [DATE] at 1:14 P.M. revealed ADON-RN #34 had an inactive RN license. The verification indicated the license was effective [DATE] and expired [DATE]. Interview with Human Resources Director (HRD) #402 on [DATE] at 1:32 P.M. confirmed ADON-RN #34 was hired by the facility on [DATE]. HRD #402 further confirmed ADON-RN #34's nursing license was expired. HRD #402 stated ADON-RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-04-24 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviewand policy review, the facility failed to conduct Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meetings at least quarterly. This had the potential to affect all 103 residents in the facility. The census was 103. Findings include: Review of meetings for Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, (QAPI), for the years 2023, and 2022, revealed no documentation of at least quarterly meetings. Interview on 04/20/23 at 2:00 P.M., with the Administrator verified there was no documentation of regular QAPI meetings for years 2023 and 2022. The Administrator stated she was newly hired and the documentation of previous QAPI meetings was missing. Review of the policy titled, QAPI Committee, dated 05/01/22, revealed the QAPI committee will meet at least quarterly to develop plans of action to correct issues.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, employee file review, staff interviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to implement and monitor the water system to prevent Legionella disease, and to ensure employees were screened or tested for tuberculosis. This had the potential to affect all 103 residents in the facility. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Review of facility Legionella disease control program revealed no water temperature monitoring log for the months of September 2022, October 2022, November 2022, December 2022, January 2023, February 2023, March 2023, and April 2023. Interview on 04/20/23 at 12:00 P.M., Maintenance Director (MD) #81 verified the water temperature monitoring was a process identified in the facility Legionella Water Management plan for the prevention of Legionella disease. MD #81 verified the last water temperature monitoring occurred on 08/17/22. MD #81 verified he had been in the maintenance department since December 2022. Review of the policy titled, Legionella Water Management, dated 05/01/22, revealed the plan was to reduce the risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-24 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to notify Medicaid recipient residents when they had exceeded the Medicaid eligible personal fund limit. This affected 15 (#36, #18, #86, #25, #23, #46, #37, #14, #72, #45, #88, #2, #29, #19, and #15) of 15 Medicaid residents with personal funds accounts reviewed. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Review of the facility census list revealed Residents #36, #18, #86, #25, #23, #46, #37, #14, #72, #45, #88, #2, #29, #19, and #15 were Medicaid eligible recipients. Review of Resident Fund Log dated 04/19/23, revealed Residents #36, #18, #86, #25, #23, #46, #37, #14, #72, #45, #88, #2, #29, #19, and #15 were over the Medicaid $2,000.00 limit in their personal fund account. Resident #72 was over the Medicaid eligibility limit by $10,624.17; Resident #86 was over the limit by $13,957.88 and Resident #88 was over the limit by $14,196.27. Interview on 04/20/23 at 11:30 A.M., with Business Office Manager (BOM) #9 verified the residents receiving Medicaid should be notified when reaching $200.00 of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Observation on 04/18/23 at 8:23 A.M., revealed on the wall behind Resident #30 bed board, a four foot by four-foot wall area with multiple half inch deep cuts in the wall. This exposed a non-cleanable wall surface. Interview on 04/18/23 at 8:23 A.M., with Resident #30 stated the wall had the exposed area and cuts since admission on [DATE]. He stated he did not like how the wall looked. Interview on 04/20/23 at12:00 P.M., with Maintenance Director #81 verified the wall behind Resident #30 bed board had large scrapes and deep cuts which was not a cleanable surface. The Maintenance Director #81stated he was unsure how long the wall had been in disrepair. Review of the policy titled Homelike Environment dated 05/01/22 revealed the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. 4. Observation on 04/18/23 at 8:59 A.M., revealed Resident #39 to be in his bed. The left side of Resident #39's bed was observed to be up against the wall with a circular baseball sized hole in the wall next to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interviews, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received showers per their preference. This affected four (#05, #40, #47 and #91) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The census was 103. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #05's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/15/22, with diagnoses including arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, low back pain, quadriplegia, and other reduced mobility. Review of Resident #05's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be cognitively intact and Resident #05 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, and toileting. Resident #05 required total dependence with eating and two-person physical assistance with part of the bathing activity. Review of Resident #05's activities of daily living (ADL) care plan dated 12/15/22 revealed Resident #05 needed assistance with ADLs. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not stored at the bedside. This affected one (#21) of five reviewed for medications. The facility also failed to ensure insulin and inhaler was discarded when expired. This potentially could affect 15 residents identified as receiving insulin and/or inhaler. The census was 103. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included diabetes, heart failure, and Schizophrenia. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #21 revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the medical record from [DATE] through [DATE] revealed Resident #21 was not a self-medicate. Observation on [DATE] at 8:24 P.M., revealed Resident #21 had a bottle of refresh tears, Lotemacx eye drops, Advair inhaler, and an Atrovent inhaler lying on the bed in a baggie. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, meal spreadsheet review, observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide food portions as planned by a Registered Dietitian. This affected 16 (#3, #54, #53, #20, #47, #12, #73, #38, #83, #22, #41, #11, #95, #26, #69, and #52) of 16 residents who received a consistent carbohydrate diet and all 101 residents who received food from the kitchen did not receive a bread portion at the lunch meal on 04/19/23. Residents #29 and #59 do not receive food from the kitchen. The census was 103. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Residents #3, #54, #53, #20, #47, #12, #73, #38, #83, #22, #41, #11, #95, #26, #69, and #52 were on consistent carbohydrate diets. Review of the 04/19/23 lunch meal spreadsheet revealed residents with physician orders for a consistent carbohydrate diet were listed to receive a number 10 size portion of rice. Observation on 04/19/23 at 11:13 A.M., revealed [NAME] #2 had mixed the rice portion with the meat portion. There was no separate rice portion for the consistent carbohydrate diet. Interview on 04/19/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to label stored foods, discard expired foods, and maintain food equipment in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 101 residents who received food from the kitchen. Residents #29 and #59 do not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Observation on 04/17/23 at 6:15 P.M. of the kitchen, revealed the following sanitation violations: 1. In the hand washing area, there were no paper towels. 2. In the walk-in refrigerator, there was a large container, identified as pudding, with no label or date. A large container, identified as cooked vegetable, with no label or date. A container, identified as cheese, with no label or date. A container of identified chicken soup dated 04/13/23. 3. In the walk-in freezer, there was no thermometer. 4. In the food preparation area, the was an undated bottle of opened lemon juice. There were two opened undated bread bags. There were two bulk food containers of white substances with no label. 5. In the reach in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-04-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in operating condition. This had the potential to affect 101 residents who received food from the kitchen. Residents #29 and #59 do not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Observation on 04/19/23 at 10:19 A.M, revealed in the kitchen the following food equipment in disrepair and or not operational: 1. The food plate warmer was not operation and not heating meal service plates. 2. The left door of the reach in refrigerator was no able to open. It was taped closed on the exterior surface. There was noted food debris on the shelves of the refrigerator and around the exterior surface of the taped areas. 3. The garbage disposal near the three-compartment sink was not operational. There was noted food debris around the trash cans. Interview on 04/19/23 at 9:20 A.M., with [NAME] #2 verified the plate warmer had not been operational for several weeks. The meal plates were not heated, causing loss of meal food temperatures. [NAME] #2 stated the door of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, resident interview, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was assessed to self-administer medications. This affected one (#78) of one random resident observed. The census was 103. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #78 revealed and admission on [DATE], with diagnoses including pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, hypertension, anxiety disorder, solitary pulmonary nodule, and dementia with other diseases. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #78 revealed an impaired cognition. Resident #78 was coded with delusions during the assessment period. Resident #78 required limited assistance for bed mobility, supervision for transfers, eating and toileting. Review of the plan of care for Resident #78 revealed I have potential for altered respiratory status, difficulty breathing related to congestive obstructive pulmonary disease.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was treated with dignity and respect. This affected one (#47) of 25 residents reviewed for care and treatment. The census was 103. Findings included: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/14/22. Medical diagnoses included puerperal psychosis, cancer, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, bilateral below the knee amputation (BKA), Schizophrenia, and obstructive uropathy. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was moderately cognitively impaired. Her functional status was extensive assistance or bed mobility and toilet use. She was dependent on staff for transfers, and supervision for eating. She has an indwelling Foley catheter. Review of care plan dated 10/05/22 revealed Resident #47 has a behavior problem and will make false allegations towards staff to get them in trouble. Interventions were to approach her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff and resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse. This affected one (#47) of four residents reviewed for potential abuse. The census was 103. Findings included: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/14/22. Medical diagnoses included puerperal psychosis, cancer, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, bilateral below the knee amputation (BKA), Schizophrenia, and obstructive uropathy. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was moderately cognitively impaired. Her functional status was extensive assistance or bed mobility and toilet use. She was dependent on staff for transfers, and supervision for eating. She has an indwelling Foley catheter. Review of care plan dated 10/05/22 revealed Resident #47 has a behavior problem and will make false allegations towards staff to get them in trouble. Interventions were to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, facility investigation review, and policy review, the facility failed to report resident to resident altercation. This affected four residents (#80, #5, #4 and #77) of five reviewed for potential abuse. The census was 103. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 10/04/22, with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, dementia with behaviors, depression, anxiety disorder, weight loss, psychosis bipolar disorder, visual hallucinations, and auditory hallucinations. Review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #80 revealed a brief interview mental status was completed by staff with severe cognitive impairment. Resident #80 revealed physical and verbal behavioral symptoms director towards others, behaviors such as hitting, scratching self, pacing rummaging, occurs 4-6 days during the assessment period. Resident #80 requires limited assistance for bed mobility, transfers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a care plan for hearing loss and antipsychotic medications. This affected two (#82 and #92) of 25 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #92's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/25/23, with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, sepsis, osteomyelitis, anemia, hematuria, hyperlipidemia, major depressive disorder, and other symbolic dysfunctions. Review of Resident #92's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be moderately cognitively impaired and Resident #92 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and toileting. Resident #92 also required total assistance with personal hygiene and supervision with eating. Resident #93 had adequate hearing with the use of a device. Review of Resident #92's care plans dated 04/18/23 revealed Resident #92 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident experiencing pain was provided timely pain management. This affected one (#47) of one reviewed for pain management. The census was 103. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 06/14/22. Medical diagnoses included puerperal psychosis, cancer, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, bilateral below the knee amputation (BKA), schizophrenia, and obstructive uropathy. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was moderately cognitively impaired. Her functional status was extensive assistance for bed mobility, personal hygiene, and toilet use. She was a total dependence for transfers, and supervision for eating. She has an indwelling Foley catheter. Review of care plan dated 06/22/22 revealed Resident #47 had the potential for pain discomfort. Interventions were to anticipate my need for pain relief and respond as soon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were reviewed by the physician timely and monthly medication reviews were completed by the pharmacy. This affected two (#83 and #89) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #83's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/19/21, with diagnoses including schizophrenia, other pneumonia, muscle weakness, dysphagia, type two diabetes, major depressive disorder, necrotizing fasciitis, unspecified atrial fibrillation, osteomyelitis, schizoaffective disorder, and delusional disorder. Review of Resident #83's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be cognitively intact and Resident #83 required supervision with bed mobility, dressing, personal hygiene, eating and toileting. Review of Resident #83's physician order dated 04/23/22 revealed Resident #83 was ordered Sertraline…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a gradual dose reduction or contraindication for a gradual dose reduction of an antidepressant. The facility also failed to ensure a resident that received an antipsychotic medication had an appropriate diagnosis and indications for use. This affected two (#82 and #83) residents of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #83's chart revealed an admission date of 04/19/21, with diagnoses including schizophrenia, other pneumonia, muscle weakness, dysphagia, type two diabetes, major depressive disorder, necrotizing fasciitis, unspecified atrial fibrillation, osteomyelitis, schizoaffective disorder, and delusional disorder. Review of Resident #83's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident to be cognitively intact and Resident #83 required supervision with bed mobility, dressing, personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide dental services. This affected one (#33) of one resident reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #33 revealed an admission on [DATE], with diagnoses including schizophrenia, Addisonian crisis, toxic encephalopathy, kidney failure, major depressive disorder, acute respiratory failure, and convulsions. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #33 revealed an impaired cognition. Resident #33 requires extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and supervised eating. Resident #33 was assessed and coded for no dental problems. Review of the plan of care for Resident #33 revealed a nutritional risk related to diagnoses of schizophrenia with potential for altered oral intakes related to behavior, history of refusing meals. Interventions include assessing signs and symptoms of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, hospice staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the hospice provider and the facility collaborated to develop a plan of care. This affected one (#79) of one resident reviewed for hospice services. The census was 103. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #79 revealed an admission date on 11/01/22, with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (brain damage), pulmonary embolism (blood clot), deep vein embolism, hypoxemia (low oxygen), kidney failure and kidney disease, history of covid-19, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, diabetes mellitus type two, adult failure to thrive, Alzheimer's disease and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #79 revealed severe cognitive impairment. Resident #79 requires total assistance from two staff members for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Resident #79 requires total assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews, staff interviews and policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered and received pneumococcal and influenza vaccines. This affected two (#89 and #55) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 103. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #89's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/17/22, with diagnoses including polyneuropathy, encephalopathy, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, vascular dementia, asthma, metabolic encephalopathy and generalized abdominal pain. Review of Resident #89's medical record from 11/17/22 to 04/20/23, revealed no documentation that Resident #89 received a consent for the pneumococcal vaccine, refused the pneumococcal vaccine or received the pneumococcal vaccine. Interview on 04/19/23 at 5:45 P.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #89 did not have any documentation indicating Resident #89 had received a consent for the pneumococcal vaccine, refused the pneumococcal vaccine or received the pneumococcal vaccine. 2. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-24 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was offered a COVID-19 vaccine. This affected one (#89) of five residents reviewed for vaccinations. The facility census was 103. Findings include: Review of Resident #89's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/17/22, with diagnoses including polyneuropathy, encephalopathy, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy, vascular dementia, asthma, metabolic encephalopathy and generalized abdominal pain. Review of Resident #89's medical record from 11/17/22 to 04/20/23 revealed no documentation that Resident #89 received a consent for the coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine, refused the COVID-19 vaccine or received the COVID-19 vaccine. Interview on 04/19/23 at 5:45 P.M., with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified Resident #89 did not have any documentation indicating Resident #89 had received a consent for the COVID-19 vaccine, refused the COVID-19 vaccine or received the COVID-19 vaccine. Review of the policy titled COVID-19 Precautions and Prevention, dated 10/05/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affected 107 of 108 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified Resident #2 did not receive food from the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the dry storage area with Dietary Manager #506 on 11/04/19 at 8:10 A.M. revealed there were items on the shelves for use without dates they were put on the shelves and the items did not have expiration dates on the packaging or use by dates on the packaging. The food items included: • Five, five pound dry milk mix bags; • Five, eighty ounce, pancake mix boxes; • One, 14 ounce chicken gravy mix; • Fourteen bags of 24 ounce country gravy mix; • Nine boxes of marshmallow pies, eight pies each box, • Five boxes of fudge rounds 24 rounds in each box, • Five bags of 15.5 ounce Monterey jack flavored cheese sauce. During an interview with Dietary Manager #506 on 11/04/19 at 8:15 A.M. it was verified the use by date and expiration dates were not on the above listed items. The manager…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-11-07 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review and staff interview; the facility failed to develop baseline care plans. This affected four (#9, #43, #52 and #110) of 11 residents reviewed for the development of the baseline care plan. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included sepsis, muscle weakness, dysphagia, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, dementia with behavioral disturbances, colitis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, coagulation factor deficiency, thrombocytopenia, osteoarthritis, heart failure, major depressive disorder and suicidal ideation. Further review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed there was no baseline care plan. Interview on 11/06/19 at 7:52 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was no baseline care plan developed for Resident #52. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #9 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication storage carts were secured. This affected two of six medication carts. This had the potential to affect 30 of the 40 residents residing on the units who were independently mobile. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Observation on 11/04/19 at 2:28 P.M. revealed the medication storage cart on the male secured unit was unlocked and unsupervised in the hallway. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #502 was observed leaving the medication cart unattended. LPN #502 exited the unit for five minutes. Interview with LPN #502 on 11/04/19 at 2:33 P.M. verified the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. The LPN verified the medication cart should have been locked. 2. Observation on 11/06/19 at 4:15 P.M. revealed the medication storage cart on the female secured unit was unlocked and unsupervised in the hallway. Interview with LPN #503 at 4:22 P.M. verified the medication cart was unlocked and unattended. LPN stated she went to the nurses station to get an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the resident's room in safe and sanitary operating condition. This affected seven rooms and had the potential to affect all 108 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation and interview of the environment in resident rooms on 11/06/19 from 9:50 A.M. through 10:05 A.M. with Facility Maintenance Director #540 revealed the following identified concerns: • There were multiple holes in the closet door in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed B. • The call light was not working in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A. • The bedside table was soiled with enteral feeding solution in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A. • There was a ripped arm rest on the left side of a wheelchair in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A. • The closet door was broken on the railing and leaning on the wall in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A. • The foot board on the bed was not attached in 306 bed B. • There were holes in the walls behind the bed and a wall had been repaired but not painted in room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to update care plans to meet the needs of a resident. This affected two (Resident #31 and #47) of 25 residents reviewed during the final investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date 12/14/10. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus type two and diabetic neuropathy. Further review of Resident #47's medical record revealed she acquired a unstageable pressure ulcer (an ulcer covered in slough or eschar) to her right heel on 10/28/19. Review of the care plan, dated 06/21/16, revealed it was not updated to include the pressure ulcer to her right heel. Interview on 11/07/19 at 9:38 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #512 confirmed Resident #47's care plan was not updated to include the right heel unstageable pressure ulcer. RN #512 stated it was her expectation that Resident #47's care plan would have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure nail care was completed for a resident who required assistance with personal hygiene. This affected one (#18) of one resident reviewed for nail care. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed the resident had an admission date of 07/16/19. Diagnoses included abnormal heart beat, heart failure, major depressive disorder and vascular dementia with behavioral disturbances. Review of the plan of care for activity of daily living (ADL), dated 07/18/19, revealed the resident may require assistance with ADLs and may be at risk for developing complications associated with decreased ADL self-performance. Interventions included to report any changes in ADL self-performance to nurse. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/27/19, revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident required extensive assist with personal hygiene. Observation on 11/05/19 at 2:30 P.M. of Resident #18 revealed her nails on both fingers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to accurately document care given to a resident. This affected one (Resident #47) of 25 residents reviewed during the final investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 108. Findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date 12/14/10. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus type two and diabetic neuropathy. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 08/23/19, revealed Resident #47 was cognitively intact. Review of the wound nurse practitioner notes revealed Resident #47 obtained a unstageable pressure ulcer (a localized area covered in eschar or slough) to to the right heel on 10/28/19. Review of the facility wound assessments, dated 10/28/19 and 11/04/19, revealed that the right heel unstageable pressure ulcer was not identified in these assessments. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 03/07/19 for a head-to-toe skin check every night shift every Monday and Thursday for routine assessment. An order dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
STEIN, MARKIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 02/01/2022
TENENBAUM, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 02/01/2022
FERGUSON, HAROLDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
WALTER, MANDYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/15/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$482K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 87%Medicare 2%Other / private 12%

About 87% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $482K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$272per resident / day
operating cost
$8,274per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$262per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366035. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next