Sanctuary Wadsworth

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 29 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 17% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 67.3 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.15 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.00 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-07-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess and treat Resident #10's pain prior to or during wound care to her sacrum. Actual Harm occurred on 07/09/26 when Resident #10 was observed to verbalize pain every four seconds during a 23-minute continuous observation of care and her pain was not assessed or treated until care was complete, at which time her pain was rated as a 10 out of 10 (on a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the greatest amount of pain one could experience). This affected one (Resident #10) of two residents observed for wound care. The facility census was 64.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 06/09/23 with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, chronic kidney disease, cognitive communication deficit, heart failure and polyosteoarthritis.Review of the care plan dated 06/12/23 for Resident #10 revealed she had altered comfort as evidence by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-07-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure a sanitary kitchen and resident refrigerators were maintained to prevent food spoilage. This had the potential to affect all 59 residents receiving meals from the kitchen, as five residents (Residents #4, #27, #31, #63, and #64) received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 64.Findings include: 1. Observation on 07/08/26 at 11:08 A.M. during lunch meal service revealed Dietary #514 had a hair net on but hair on the back of her neck was not restrained and the line of the hair net was approximately an inch above the exposed hair. At the time of the observation Dietary Manager #510 confirmed the observation. Observation on 07/08/26 at 12:31 P.M. revealed Dietary Manager #510's hairnet was raised off of her hairline and not all hair was contained around her ears and at the base of her neck. Dietary #518's hairnet was pushed back from the top of her hairline several inches and was not fully contained. Dietary #526's hairnet was not fully covering the hair above her ears and had hair exposed. Dietary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-07-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, review of personnel records, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility administration failed to effectively administer the facility when they failed to maintain professional standards of practice by falsifying clinical documentation and instructing staff to do the same, thereby compromising the integrity of facility records and resident care. This had the potential to affect 21 residents (Residents #1, #3, #6, #9, #14, #17, #18, #22, #26, #28, #32, #33, #37, #41, #43, #47, #51, #53, #56, #58 and #64), who received blood glucose monitoring. This also had the potential to affect the clinical documentation all 64 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 64. Findings include:Review of the employee file for the Director of Nursing (DON), hire date of 06/05/26, included her job description. The DON job description, undated, revealed she was responsible for organizing and directing activities in the nursing department to ensure proper resident care. The DON would…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-07-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe environment related to potholes in the parking lot. This affected five residents (#23, #25, #28, #44, and #68) of five residents present at the resident council meeting. Additionally, the facility failed to maintain water temperature of sinks and showers at a level a reasonable person would find comfortable. This had the potential to affect the 33 residents (#1, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, #11, #15, #16, #19, #21, #23, #29, #30, #32, #37, #39, #41, #43, #46, #48, #55, #58, #61, #63, #64, #68, #69, #76, #77, #78, #79, and #80) residing on the 200-unit and 400-unit within the facility. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the quotes to repair the parking lot revealed quotes were received on 09/16/24, 02/25/26, and 03/26/26. On 07/07/26 at 7:53 A.M., an observation of the parking lot in front of the building revealed 10 large potholes. On 07/08/26 at 9:52 A.M., during the resident council meeting during the annual survey, an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-07-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident records in a complete and accurate manner. This affected three residents (#2, #9 and #70) out of 22 residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical records. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 08/08/20. Diagnoses included but were not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis, venous insufficiency and non-pressure chronic ulcer of part of right fit and part of right lower leg. Review of the 06/18/26 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #2 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 11 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #2 was noted to required moderate assistance with bathing. Review of Resident #2' care plan revealed it was last reviewed on 05/12/26 and indicated an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit related to hemiplegia. Interventions included shower two times a week…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-20 · tag F0573 — isolated
  Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were available upon request. This affected one (Resident #72) of one resident reviewed for medical records requests. The facility census was 64.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 05/07/26 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, heart failure, anxiety and depression. Resident #72 was discharged from the facility on 05/25/26. Interview on 07/08/26 at 11:47 A.M. with Clinical Manager #533 revealed she started in the medical records office on 05/18/26. She stated the previous medical records clerk never provided her information that Resident #72 would like a copy of her medical records.Interview on 07/08/26 at 11:58 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #515 revealed she had corresponded with Resident #72's family via email. However, she was unable to provide an email related to the resident or her representative requesting medical records. LPN #515 stated the medical records request could…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident's advance directives were accurately reflected in the medical record. This affected one (Resident #80) of 18 residents reviewed for advance directives. The facility census was 64.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 07/03/26 with diagnoses including cellulitis (bacterial infection of the skin layers and underlying tissue) and malignant neoplasm of the prostate (cancer). Review of Resident #80's face sheet revealed he was a Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care Arrest (DNRCCA) which means healthcare staff would provide all life-saving measures until a person's heart or breathing stops.Review of the physician's orders for Resident #80 revealed he had an order for an advance directive of DNRCCA dated 07/04/26. Continued review of Resident #80's medical record revealed no DNRCCA form signed by a physician was present in the electronic medical record or paper chart. Interview on 07/08/26 at 10:18 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was not a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility incident log, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was timely reported to the State Agency as required. This affected one resident (Resident #20) of one resident reviewed for self-reported incidents. The facility census was 64.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 05/11/22. Diagnoses included but were not limited to encephalopathy, obstructive hydrocephalus, chronic respiratory therapy, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, hypokalemia and anemia.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #20 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. Resident #20 was noted to use a wheelchair and required maximum assist for upper dressing and rolling left to right. Resident #20 was noted to be dependent for toileting, bathing, lower body dressing, and transfers.Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility incident log, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure an injury of unknown origin was timely and thoroughly investigated as required. This affected one resident (Resident #20) of one resident reviewed for self-reported incidents. The facility census was 64.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 05/11/22. Diagnoses included but were not limited to encephalopathy, obstructive hydrocephalus, chronic respiratory therapy, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, hypokalemia and anemia.Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #20 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 which indicated intact cognition. Resident #20 was noted to use a wheelchair and required maximum assist for upper dressing and rolling left to right. Resident #20 was noted to be dependent for toileting, bathing, lower body dressing, and transfers.Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview, the facility failed to complete the resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately. This affected one resident (#74) out of three residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility census was 64. Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #74 revealed an admission date of 05/06/26 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, spinal stenosis, anemia, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Resident #74 discharged from the facility on 05/28/26. Review of the discharge planning review assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #74 had met her skilled goals and would be discharging to home or community. Review of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) dated 05/21/26 indicated Resident #74's last covered day was 05/27/26. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #74 had an unplanned discharge to home or community. Review of the progress note dated 05/28/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were revised to reflect current resident medical changes and preferences. This affected three residents (Residents #20, #45 and #68) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 64. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an admission date of 05/11/22. Diagnoses included but were not limited to encephalopathy, obstructive hydrocephalus, chronic respiratory therapy, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, hypokalemia and anemia. Review of the 04/08/26 annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 for Resident #20 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 which indicated intact cognition. Resident #20 was noted to use a wheelchair and required maximum assist for upper dressing and rolling left to right. Resident #20 was also noted to be dependent for toileting, bathing, lower dressing and transfers.Review of physician orders for Resident #20 revealed a 12/01/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $80K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH