No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Walnut Hills Nursing Home

4748 Olde Pump Street, Walnut Creek, OH 44687 · Non profit - Church related · 56 certified beds · (330) 893-3200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (330) 893-3200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Mar 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Mar 2025
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
126 N Broadway St · (330) 852-3211 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4900 Oak St · (330) 893-0290 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
908 Shanesville Rd SW · (330) 987-6973 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.9%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%6.2%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.2%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.7%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.1%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.7%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.5%21.4%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.7%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.5%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.5%24.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit2.9%12.9%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 77 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.15hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.6%CMS range 47.5–65.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.0–13.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge61.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay4.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.7%CMS range 2.8–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.811.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.71
RN hours/ resident / day
1.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.94
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.71
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.43
RN hoursweekends
52.1%
Total nursing turnover
81.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 41.8 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.94 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.88 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.43 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-11-07)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2022-09-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record reviews, reviews of a facility investigation, review of self-reported incidents (SRIs), and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation. This affected two (#4 and #47) of two residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 47. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 05/24/23 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure, and depression. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #4 was unable to be interviewed and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the physician's orders for December 2024 revealed Oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) 20 milligrams (mg) given every six hours routinely and a as needed (PRN)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-07 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to completely and accurately report staff hours worked for the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the PBJ report revealed the facility failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours per day on 06/08/24, 06/09/24, 06/23/24, 06/29/24, and 06/30/24. Review of the staffing schedules for the nurses on 06/08/24, 06/09/24, 06/23/24, 06/29/24, and 06/30/24 revealed there was a licensed nurse in the facility. Interview on 11/07/24 at 9:45 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the corporate office stated they had trouble getting the invoices for agency staff and did not submit accurate staffing for nurses on 06/08/24, 06/09/24, 06/23/24, 06/29/24, and 06/30/24.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete hand hygiene during the dining room and room tray meal service. This affected two residents (Resident #25 and Resident #39) with the potential to affect all 13 residents on the skilled unit. The facility census was 41. Findings Include: 1. Observation on 11/04/24 at 12:04 P.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #356 was performing the lunch meal service in the skilled unit dining room for nine residents. CNA #356 had served the residents their drinks of choice prior to the tray cart being delivered from the kitchen. Upon receiving the tray cart in the dining room, CNA #356 began serving the trays to each resident, and assisting in preparing the food (such as removing lids to items and cutting up meat as needed) for ease of eating by the residents. After each resident was served, CNA #356 would return to the tray cart, open the cart door, remove a tray, and close the door without sanitizing or washing his hands. CNA #356 continued to serve the lunch trays until each resident in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during medication administration. This deficient practice affected two residents (#10 and #16) out of six residents observed for infection control medication administration. The facility census was 41. Findings Include: Observation on 11/05/24 from 12:57 P.M. to 1:15 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #344 completing noon medications administration for residents residing on the skilled unit. LPN #344 sanitized hands prior to preparing Resident #16's narcotic medication for administration and locked the medication cart. LPN #344 then knocked on Resident #16's room door and entered the room. LPN #344 handed the medication cup to Resident #16 and Resident #16 took the medication with a drink of water. LPN #344 removed the medication and water cup from the room, returned to the medication cart and disposed of the cups in the trash can. LPN #344 then documented the administration of Resident #16's medication in Medication Administration Record (MAR). LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow physician ordered oxygen settings for administration of oxygen to residents. This affected one resident (Resident #15) out of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 41. Findings Include: Review of Resident #15's medical record revealed Resident #15 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory disorder, dementia, and breast cancer. Resident #15 required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. Review of Resident #15's physician orders revealed an order dated 10/11/24 to administer continuous oxygen 1 to 2 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula to maintain oxygen saturation (SAT) above 90 percent (%) for dependence on supplemental oxygen. Review of Resident #15's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 10/01/24 to 11/06/24 revealed the order dated 10/11/24 to administer continuous oxygen 1 to 2 LPM via nasal cannula to maintain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of infection control logs, and policy review, the facility failed to update and implement their antibiotic stewardship program policy to ensure antibiotics were ordered appropriately. This affected one (Resident #30) out of one reviewed for antibiotic use. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure and chronic kidney disease. A progress note dated 08/14/24 at 5:40 A.M. revealed Resident #30 voiced a complaint of pressure and discomfort to bladder. Resident #30 reported feeling the need to void but unable to do so. A urine culture reported 08/15/24 revealed mixed microbiota to urine sample for Resident #30 due to possible contamination. No antibiotic sensitivity was identified. Review of the McGeer Criteria for Infection Surveillance Checklist dated 08/16/24 revealed Resident #30 had dysuria, pain, swelling, and/or tenderness. The microbiologic criteria was not met due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate care and services to prevent the development and decline of pressure ulcers. This affected three residents (#37, #87 and #91) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility identified three residents with pressure ulcers and the facility census was 45. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #87 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including post-polio syndrome, hip fracture, hypertension and depression. Review of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk dated 01/06/24 revealed Resident #87 was at high risk for pressure ulcer/injury development. There was no risk assessment completed between 01/06/24 and 06/25/24. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #87 was cognitively intact and was not at risk for pressure ulcers. Review of the Wound Progress Report dated 05/29/24 revealed Resident #87 developed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident right posting review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident mail was delivered unopened. This affected two residents (#79 and #91) of five sampled residents. The census was 45. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #79 was admitted on [DATE] and Resident #91 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of Resident #79's quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] and Resident #91's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the residents were cognitively intact for daily decision-making. On 06/25/24 at 3:35 P.M., observation of the facility required postings revealed residents had the right to have mail delivered unopened. On 06/26/24 between 9:53 A.M. and 10:05 A.M., interview with Resident #79 revealed her mail was opened in May 2024 by staff without her permission. Resident #79 stated her opened mail included a retail store package, her wireless service provider bill and an advertisement. The mail was delivered to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure ostomy supplies were available as ordered. This affected one of one resident (#9) residing in the facility with an ostomy. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #9 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hip fracture, weakness, atrial fibrillation, constipation and colostomy. Review of the electronic Physician Orders dated 06/26/24 revealed Resident #9 was ordered to use the following ostomy supplies: [NAME] Wafer #11402 and [NAME] Bag #18182. Resident #9's ostomy wafer and ostomy bag was to be changed every three days and as needed. On 07/03/24 at 9:29 A.M., observation of Resident #9's ostomy supplies located in her closet and top dresser drawer were labeled [NAME] Wafer #11402 and Ostomy Bag #18373. Charge Nurse #138 asked Resident #9 if she could see what ostomy supplies were in use at the time of the observation, and Resident #9 raised her shirt revealing an ostomy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to obtain weights as ordered. This affected one resident (#37) of six sampled residents. The census was 45. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #37 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included cerebral infarction, [NAME]-barre syndrome, arthritis, multiple myeloma, barrett's esophagus paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, severe protein calorie malnutrition, and severe sepsis with septic shock. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37's cognition was moderately impaired for daily decision-making, was at risk for pressure ulcer development, and had no unhealed pressure, venous or arterial ulcers. Review of the Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had a clinically significant weight loss of 18% prior to admission to the facility with severe protein calorie malnutrition. Weights were to be monitored. Review of the electronic Physician Orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure their pharmacy services provided resident intravenous medication in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#45) of two residents reviewed for intravenous medication administration. The census was 45. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #45 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, bacteremia and sepsis. Review of the Physician Orders dated 05/27/24 revealed to administer Ceftriaxone (antibiotic) 2 grams (g) intravenous (IV) every 12 hours for infection through 06/28/24. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated June 2024 revealed the following IV antibiotics were not administered as ordered: Ceftriaxone 2 g IV was not administered upon rising on 06/08/24, 06/10/24, 06/19/24, 06/23/24 and 06/24/24. Ampicillin 2 g IV for bacteremia was not administered at 12 noon on 06/19/24 and 06/20/24. Ceftriaxone 2 g IV was not administered in the evening on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record. This affected three residents (#45, #87 and #99) of six sampled residents. The census was 45. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #99 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure and edema. Review of the hospital Discharge Instructions dated 10/18/23 revealed Resident #99 was prescribed Torsemide (diuretic) 40 mg once a day. Review of the electronic Physician's Orders dated 10/17/23 revealed to administer two tablets of Torsemide 20 mg daily. Review of the electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated October 2023 revealed two different doses to administer for Torsemide. The order was transcribed on the electronic MAR as follows: 'Torsemide 20 mg by mouth once daily. Give two tablets to equal 40 mg for Essential Hypertension. 20 mg po (orally) QD (everyday)'. On 07/03/24 at 12:40 P.M., interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain adequate infection control practices. This affected one resident (#87) of three residents observed for pressure ulcer treatments and one resident (#25) resident observed for incontinence care. The census was 45. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #87 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including post-polio syndrome, hip fracture, hypertension and depression. Review of the Wound Progress Report dated 06/25/24 revealed Resident #87 had developed two facility acquired pressure ulcers including an unstageable pressure ulcer to the left midline buttock measuring 5.22 centimeters (cm) in length by 2.8 (cm) in width. The wound bed was covered with slough. On 06/27/24 at 12:18 P.M., observation of Resident #87's left midline buttock pressure ulcer treatment revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #60 gathered her supplies, washed her hands at the sink and Hospice Aide #204 rolled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, job description review, and interview the facility failed to ensure a medication assistant did not perform duties outside her scope of practice. This affected four residents (#25, #32, #35 and #38 ) of nine residents reviewed for care and service. The facility census was 50. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included low back pain, diabetes, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, anxiety disorder, depression, thyroid nodule, seasonal allergies, gout, malignant neoplasm of large intestines, cataracts, cerebral infarction, and traumatic brain injury. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had intact cognition. Review of the April physician's orders revealed Resident #25 had an order for tramadol (a narcotic pain medication) 50 milligrams (mg) once daily. Review of the February 2024 medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent. Three errors occurred within 27 opportunities for error resulting in a medication error rate of 11.0 %. This affected two residents (Resident #45 and #49) of four reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 50. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia to the right side, dysphagia, atherosclerotic heart disease, rheumatoid arthritis, hypertension, congestive heart failure, Sjogren's syndrome nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage, pacemaker, and depression. Review of the quarterly [NAME] Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 had moderately impaired cognition. Review of the [DATE] physician's orders revealed Resident #45 had an order for Refresh tears 0.5 percent one drops in both eyes three times daily and lactulose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medial record and interview with staff, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified Resident #31 had not received her antidepressant medication as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (Resident #31) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 53. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, dementia, insomnia, schizophrenia, hypertension, hemiplegia, polyneuropathy, restless leg syndrome, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, breast cancer with breast removal, anxiety disorder and Parkinson's disease. Review of the physician orders revealed Resident #31 had an order for Zoloft 25 milligrams once daily dated 06/26/23. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had intact cognition. Review of the December 2023 medication administration record revealed Zoloft for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record and interview with the staff, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for Resident #13. This affected one resident ( Resident #13) of six residents reviewed for plan of care. The facility census was 53. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included heart failure, dementia, hypertension, osteoarthritis, insomnia, history of falling and hearing loss. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 13 had severely impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel and did not have any pressure areas. Review of the plan of care dated 09/01/22 with a revision date of 01/26/24 revealed Resident #13 was at risk for fall related injuries related to history of falls, impaired cognition, dementia, impaired mobility, impaired hearing, impaired vision, and insomnia. Intervention included a fall mat to the open side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #31, who had diagnoses of dementia and schizophrenia received adequate treatment, including the administration of the anti-depressant medication, Zoloft as ordered to assist the resident to maintain her highest practicable level of well-being. This affected one resident (#31) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 53. Findings included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, dementia, insomnia, schizophrenia, hypertension, hemiplegia, polyneuropathy, restless leg syndrome, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, breast cancer with breast removal, anxiety disorder, Parkinson's disease. Review of the physician's orders revealed Resident #31 had an order for Zoloft 25 milligrams (mg) once daily dated 06/26/23. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the anti-anxiety medication, Ativan was only administered to Resident #13 with a valid physician order. This affected one resident (#13) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 53. Findings Included: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, dementia, hypertension, osteoarthritis, insomnia, history of falling and hearing loss. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident # 13 had severely impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel and did not have any pressure areas. Review of the medication incident report dated 01/31/24 revealed on 01/10/24 Agency Nurse# 200 gave an Ativan 0.5 milligrams (mg) to Resident #13 without an order. It was not reported until 01/31/24. The notable detail of the report indicated the as needed anxiety medication had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-09-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure all potential new hires were checked against the state Nurse Aide Registry (NAR), reference checks were completed and background checks were completed in timely manner to ensure no employee had findings concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation of residents' property prior to working with residents. This was identified for seven employees, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #107, STNA #108, STNA #109, STNA #110, [NAME] Specialist #112, [NAME] #114 and Maintenance Staff (MS) #115, out of ten employees reviewed and had the potential to affect all 44 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 09/22/22 at 11:45 A.M., review of personnel files with Human Resources (HR) #106 revealed the following concerns: 1. Review of the personnel file for STNA #107 revealed a hire date of 06/27/22. There was no evidence STNA #107 was checked against the NAR on or prior to 06/27/22. No reference checks were available for review. 2. Review of the personnel file for STNA #108 revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to ensure a resident received recommended Restorative Range of Motion (ROM) services after being discharged from therapy. This affected one of one resident reviewed for restorative nursing services (Resident #27). The facility census was 44. Findings included: Review of Resident #27's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/10/06. Diagnoses included spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy, pain in her left hand, and dependence of a wheelchair. Review of Resident #27's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/09/22, revealed the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment identified that Resident #27 used a wheelchair and required extensive physical assistant with the help of two people for bed mobility/transferring and extensive physical assistance with physical help of one person for personal hygiene. Review of Resident #27's Care Plan, dated 12/01/21, revealed the resident had an activity of daily living self-care deficit related to weakness, impaired mobility, spastic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate monitoring while receiving blood thinning medication. This affected one of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use (Resident #11). The facility census was 44. Findings include: Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/07/22. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, anemia, atherosclerosis heart disease of native coronary, edema, depression, and pain. Review of Resident #11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 07/13/22, revealed the resident had a cognitive impairment. The assessment identified that Resident #11 required extensive physical assistant with the help of two people for bed mobility and transferring. Review of Resident #11's Care Plan, dated 06/24/22, revealed the resident has impaired cerebrovascular status related to hypertension and coronary artery disease. Interventions included aspirin and Plavix (blood thinning medications) therapy as ordered and to monitor for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving antibiotic medication had appropriate indication for antibiotic use. This affected two (Resident #25 and #29) of five residents reviewed for medication use. The facility census was 44. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/28/20 with diagnoses that included cerebrovascular accident with hemiplegia and congestive heart failure. Further review of the medical record revealed antibiotic orders on 10/01/21 through 10/08/21 for the use of amoxicillin (antibiotic) 500 milligrams (mg) three times daily. Review of the facility Revised McGreer Criteria for Infection Surveillance Checklist (antibiotic assessment form) completed on 10/04/21 indicated the amoxicillin was initiated due to Resident #25 with a complaint of ear fullness. Further review of the antibiotic assessment form revealed no evidence of any other symptoms reported by the resident. The form indicated the use of antibiotics did not meet criteria for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-12-05 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the width between bed rails were the proper dimensions to ensure safety for 10 residents (Resident #5, Resident #13, Resident #15, Resident #43, Resident #19, Resident #30, Resident #35, Resident #50, Resident #52, Resident #53) out of 69 residents observed for the use of bed rails. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #52 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, abnormal posture, muscle weakness, history of falling, and attention and concentration deficit. Resident #52's Bed Rails Use Assessment Form, dated 12/02/19, revealed the resident had bed rails due to the resident representative request and for safety. Observation on 12/03/19 at 3:36 P.M. revealed Resident #52 was lying in his bed with bilateral half bed rails up. Observation on 12/03/19 at 4:00 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #38, revealed the width between the rails within the bed rail on Resident #52's bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident dignity. This affected two residents (Resident #11 and #32) observed in one of three dining rooms and one resident (Resident #8) observed with an indwelling urinary catheter. The facility identified two residents with an indwelling or external catheter. Findings include: 1. Medical record review revealed Resident #32 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and dementia. Review of the care plan: activities of daily living (ADL) Functional/Rehab Potential dated 10/18/19 revealed to provide privacy and dignity. On 12/02/19 at 11:59 A.M., observation revealed Resident #32 was sitting in a specialized wheelchair in the dining room. The lunch meal included breaded fish, tartar sauce, mashed potatoes with garlic and a piece of banana cake. On 12/02/19 between 12:03 P.M. and 12:17 P.M., observation of the lunch meal revealed the following: Resident #32 picked up the banana cake with her left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure advance directive information was consistently documented between medical record/data sources. This affected two residents (Resident's #13 and #47) of 24 residents records reviewed. Findings included: 1. Record review revealed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including low back pain, history of falling, malignant neoplasm of the bladder, dysphagia, prediabetes, diverticulitis, gastro-esophageal reflux, dementia, acute kidney failure, Parkinson disease, malignant neoplasm of the skin, hypertension, cognitive communication, anemia, and hypercholesterolemia. Review of Resident #47's paper record revealed a signed code status indicating the resident requested not to be resuscitated and comfort care-Arrest (DNRCC-A) only, however, on the outside of the chart (on the stem of the chart) indicated the resident was a full code. Review of Resident #47's current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, beneficiary notification review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents with required information regarding options of continuation of skilled services. This affected two (Resident #34 and #71) of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #34 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension and muscle weakness. Review of the SNF (skilled nursing facility) Beneficiary Protection Notification Review dated 08/08/19 revealed current skilled services were to end on 08/07/19; however, there was no evidence of what skilled services were ending. Review of the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNFABN) dated 08/08/19 revealed the resident wanted the care listed above and could not appeal because MCR would not be billed. The services listed were for long term care services with a daily room rate of $271.00. There was no evidence the facility provided the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure eye glasses were clean for residents requiring assistance. This affected one (Resident #61) of three residents reviewed for communication/sensory. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #61 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus and cerebral vascular accident (CVA) with left hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was cognitively intact for daily decision-making, had adequate vision with the use of glasses and he required extensive assist with personal hygiene. Review of the undated Resident Care Guide revealed Resident #61 wore glasses. Review of the care plan: ADL Self-Care Deficit due to CVA with left hemiplegia dated 10/14/19 revealed Resident #61 required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the record revealed no care plan addressing the resident's need to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to assist and ensure supports were in place as recommended to maintain positioning. This affected one resident (Resident #32) observed in one of three dining rooms. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #32 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and open reduction internal fixation of the left hip. Review of the OT (occupational therapy) Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed recommendations including the use of a specialized wheelchair with a right lateral support, a right padded arm rest, and right padded leg box. Review of the OT Long-Term Goals dated 07/15/19 included Resident #32 was to demonstrate midline sitting after set-up in a reclining wheelchair with the addition of a right lateral support and potentially a left lateral support to facilitate the ability to perform functional tasks at wheelchair level. Review of the care plan: Musculoskeletal System revised 10/18/19 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-12-05 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident hearing aides were used. This affected one (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for communication-sensory. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #8 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression and diabetes mellitus. Review of the Resident Care Guide dated 11/16/18 revealed Resident #8 wore hearing aids. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #8 had adequate hearing with hearing aids. Review of the significant change MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate difficulty hearing and did not have hearing aids or other hearing appliance. Review of the Focused and Comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had hearing difficulty. No evidence the resident wore hearing aids. Review of the care plans: Alteration in communication related to moderate difficulty hearing dated 09/06/19 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcers were assessed accurately. This affected three (Residents #5, #47, and #52) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Finding include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anemia, Parkinson's disease, bladder cancer, prediabetes, and lumbar fracture. Review of Resident #47's Braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk dated 11/13/19 indicated the resident had a potential problem with friction and shearing and had inadequate nutritional intakes. Review of Resident #47's skin assessments dated 11/21/19 and 11/28/19 revealed on 11/21/19 a new area on the right inner buttocks was identified. The skin area was classified as other. The description indicated the area measure one centimeter (cm) long by 1/2 cm wide superficial open skin area. There was no evidence of a description of the wound. The treatment was to cleanse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #41 bilateral hand splints were applied per orders. This affect one (Resident #41) of one resident reviewed for range of motion. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer disease, primary generalized osteoarthritis, contracture of left elbow, contracture left hand, and abnormal posture. Minimum Data Assessment (MDS) completed on 10/23/19 revealed Resident #41 is rarely or never understood and has no behaviors. The MDS also revealed Resident #41 required extensive assistance of two staff members for dressing and personal hygiene. Resident #41 also had functional limitations and was impaired on both sides in upper extremities and one side of her lower extremity. Record review for Resident #41's care plan created 10/29/19 included Resident #41 was at risk for impaired functional range of motion (ROM) related to her contracture's and degenerative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #13 was properly assessed post falling and failed to investigate the falls thoroughly, and failed to ensure Resident #16 and Resident #55 were fed by qualified professionals. This affected one (Resident #13) of two residents reviewed for accidents, and two (Resident #16 and Resident #55) of four residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's, arthritis, spinal stenosis, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, attention and concentration deficit. Resident #13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed her cognition was moderately impaired, she required two person extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use, and was frequently incontinent of urine. Review of Resident #13's fall history provided by the facility revealed she had a fall on 07/13/19, 07/27/19, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-12-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices during a pressure ulcer dressing change. This affected one (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included a facility-acquired Stage III pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss with no bone, tendon or muscle exposed) to the right buttock. On 12/04/19 between 10:21 A.M. and 10:45 A.M. observation of Resident #5's pressure ulcer dressing change included the following: Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #109 gathered supplies from the treatment cart including a new package of mesalt and a pair of treatment scissors from the top drawer of the treatment cart. The scissors were laying in the drawer and were not in a sealed package. LPN #109 was observed opening the package of mesalt, used the treatment scissors to cut an approximate quarter inch strip of the mesalt,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-07-10 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, medicare health inspection report review, survey inspection review and interview, the facility failed to ensure state survey results were readily accessible for review including the most recent survey of the facility. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Medicare website: Facility Health and Complaint Inspection Data revealed the facility's most recent health inspection was completed on 09/23/22 and complaint inspections were completed on 03/13/23, 05/04/23, 02/06/24, and 04/04/24. On 06/25/24 at 3:35 P.M., observation of the facility posting corkboard located across from the activity room leading towards the 100 and 200 halls revealed required postings including resident right information and the most recent federal Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction survey results. The most recent posted health inspection (annual) survey results dated 09/23/22 did not include the facility's plan of correction. Other survey type results posted were dated 12/05/19 through 05/04/23. No other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-07-10 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to post nursing staff data in a place that was readily visible. This had the potential to affect all 45 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 06/25/24 at 3:16 P.M., observation of the facility revealed no evidence the daily nurse staffing data was posted in a visible area. On 06/26/24 at 7:47 A.M., 7:56 A.M. and 10:50 A.M., observations of the facility revealed no evidence the nurse staffing data was posted in a visible area. On 06/26/24 at 10:50 A.M., interview with Scheduling Coordinator #94 revealed the nurse staffing data was kept on a clipboard across from the receptionist. At that time, she proceeded to a table located against the wall across from the receptionist, and removed a clipboard positioned on its side facing the wall that was wedged between a set of bookends and an unlabeled green binder. Observation of the clipboard revealed the daily nurse staffing posting dated 06/26/24. On 06/26/24 at 11:04 A.M., interview with Scheduling Coordinator #94 verified the posting was not readily visible to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
KAUFFMAN, JEREMYIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2010

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$864K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 53%Medicare 8%Other / private 39%

This home reported $864K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$389per resident / day
operating cost
$11,820per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$320per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366268. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next