Community Skilled Healthcare
1320 Mahoning Ave NW, Warren, OH 44483 · Non profit - Corporation · 99 certified beds · (330) 373-1160 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $198,318 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-04)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.3% | 5.3% | 15.4% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.1% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 7.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.3% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.0% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.3% | 25.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.0% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.7% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.8% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.4% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 20.4% | 12.9% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 72 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 40.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.6%CMS range 37.7–58.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 7.3–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 36.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 36.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 88.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 3.6–15.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.96 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 90.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.16 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
69 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-04-17 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, review of an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Run Report, review of the American Heart Association (AHA) 2025 guidance for adult Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), review of the facility CPR policy and interview, the facility failed to promptly and correctly provide basic life support (BLS) including Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) to Resident #92, (a resident with advance directives for a Full Code status), when the resident was found unresponsive and absent of vital signs. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual serious life-threatening harm and subsequent death of Resident #92 on 03/07/26 at approximately 9:00 A.M. when Transportation Aide (TA) #873 identified Resident #92 was unresponsive. TA #873 alerted Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #915 Resident #92 was not responding/needed help and LPN #915 refused to help stating that's not my resident and told TA #873 to go get Registered Nurse (RN) #815. Instead of providing immediate care, RN #815 stated to TA #873 I'll…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-07-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, review of hospital records, review of information from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP), review of facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer program to ensure necessary care and services to prevent the development of, worsening of and promote the healing of a facility acquired pressure ulcer for Resident #44, a resident who was at risk for pressure ulcer development and dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) including bed mobility, turning and repositioning, incontinence care for both bowel and bladder, showering, and dressing. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and actual harm when the facility failed to implement effective interventions to prevent the development of and timely and adequately treat a facility acquired pressure ulcer. On 06/13/24 Resident #44 was seen by a wound care team for moisture associated dermatitis (MASD) (MASD is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, record review, review of a facility Self-Reported Incident (SRI), review of a facility investigation, review of a Police Report, review of the facility Elopement Policy and Procedure and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to respond and act appropriately when a door alarm sounded to prevent Resident #43, who was cognitively impaired, required a front wheeled walker for mobility with stand by assist (SBA) for ambulation, and demonstrated previous exit seeking behaviors, from eloping. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for actual harm, injury, or death on [DATE] at approximately 11:00 A.M. when Resident #43 left the facility via an alarmed emergency exit door without staff knowledge. Although, the door Resident #43 exited did alarm as designated, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #600 opened the door and because…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespreadHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to take reasonable steps to ensure residents were assisted by a designated staff member for conducting resident council meetings and residents were timely informed of meetings in advance. This had the potential to affect all 83 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 83. Findings include:Record review of the facility Activity Calanders dated January 2025, February 2025, March 2025, April 2025, October 2025, November 2025, December 2025, January 2026, February 2026, March 2026, and April 2026 revealed there were no resident council meetings identified on the calendars. There were no available activity calendars to review for May of 2025, June of 2025, July of 2025, August of 2025, and September of 2025.An interview on 04/08/26 at 10:40 A.M. with the Administrator revealed there were no resident council meetings held in February of 2026 and March of 2026 due to lack of a president for the meetings. The Administrator verified he had resident council meeting minutes for January 2026 only and handed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-17 · tag F0572 — widespreadGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of their rights on an ongoing basis. This had the potential to affect all 83 residents currently residing in the facility.Findings include:On 04/08/26 at 10:40 A.M. an interview with the Administrator revealed there were no Resident Council meetings held in February of 2026 and March of 2026 due to lack of a president for the meetings. The Administrator handed the surveyor one month of council meeting minutes dated 01/28/26. Interview with the Administrator further revealed there was no evidence that Residents' Rights were discussed at the January 2026 Resident Council Meeting. Completion of the Resident Council portion of the annual survey on 04/13/26 between 10:30 A.M. and 10:52 A.M. with Residents #11, #15 and #38 revealed there was no ongoing review of Residents' Rights during the resident council meeting or in any other fashion at the facility.Review of the available Residents Council meeting minutes from January 2026 revealed no evidence that Residents' rights were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-17 · tag F0574 — widespreadThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to inform the residents of their right to file a complaint with the State survey and certification agency. This had the potential to affect all 83 Residents in the facility.Findings include:On 04/08/26 at 10:40 A.M. an interview with the Administrator revealed there were no Resident Council meetings held in February of 2026 and March of 2026 due to lack of a president for the meetings. The Administrator handed the surveyor one month of council meeting minutes dated 01/28/26. The interview with the Administrator further revealed there was no evidence that Residents' Rights to file a complaint with the State survey and certification agency were discussed at the January 2026 Resident Council Meeting. Completion of the Resident Council portion of the annual survey on 04/13/26 between 10:30 A.M. and 10:52 A.M. with Residents #11, #15 and #38 revealed there was no information shared or discussed regarding the residents' right to file a complaint with the State survey and certification agency. Residents #11, #15…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were informed on the grievance filing process. This had the potential to affect all 83 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 83. Findings include:Record review of the facility document titled Grievance Committee Handbook, undated, revealed three residents, a fourth person (status unidentified) and two staff comprised the grievance committee. A note indicated a representative from the Ombudsman program will also be invited. This handbook was located on the bulletin board outside of the activity room. The handbook indicated in the event a grievance was filed, the above members would be contacted by the licensed social worker for a grievance meeting.Review of the resident council minutes dated 01/28/26 revealed there was no information presented to the council on how to file a grievance. Review of the facility document titled Grievance Committee Roster, with a review date of April 2026, revealed the grievance committee membership consisted of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-17 · tag F0680 — widespreadEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of records and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 83. Findings include:Review of the facility document titled Job Description of Activity Director revealed it was signed by AD #876 on 04/21/25 and witnessed by Human Resources (HR). The position reported directly to the Administrator. The professional qualifications included successfully completed the MEPAP 1 (a foundational accredited course designed to qualify participants for the Activity Professional Certified designation through the National Certification Council for Activity Professionals), ADC (activity director certified) or working on progress, and has at least one year of activity experience in long-term care. Review of the personnel file for Activity Director (AD) #876 revealed a date of hire as 09/09/2020 for the position of housekeeping. The file also contained a letter of resignation dated 08/23/21 from the position of activities. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, job description review and interview the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Review of the facility job description for Nursing Home Administrator revealed the Administrator signed the job description [DATE]. The document stated the nursing home administrator was responsible for the overall management, operation, and quality of care within a long-term care facility. This rule ensures compliance with all federal, state, and local regulations for maintaining a safe, supportive, and high-quality environment for residents, staff, and visitors. The administrator oversees clinical, financial, and operational functions and lead staff to deliver compassionate and efficient care. One…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to thoroughly conduct a facility-wide assessment with active involvement of all required participants to determine what resources are necessary to care for the residents competently during day-to-day operations. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 83.Findings include: A review of the document titled Community Skilled Facility Assessment with a completion date of 02/15/26 and a revision date of 04/13/26 revealed the persons involved in making the assessment were the Administrator, the Director of Nursing and the Medical Director. There was no evidence a member of the governing body, or representatives of the direct care staff also participated in developing the assessment. The document indicated the facility provided care and services to individuals with certain medical and cognitive disabilities. The facility utilized information generated by the minimum data set assessment to determine the care required by the resident population. The document failed to define and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-17 · tag F0843 — widespreadHave an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a current transfer agreement with an area hospital. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 83. Findings include: Review of the facility document titled Transfer Agreement, revealed the transfer agreement was by and between Community Skilled Healthcare Center located at 1320 Mahoning Ave. N.W. [NAME], Ohio 44483 and Mercy Health Youngstown LLC doing business as Saint [NAME] Hospital located at 667 [NAME], [NAME], Ohio 44482. The document further revealed the agreement shall take effect on the date signed by both parties and continue for two years unless terminated by either party within 30 days written notice to the other party. The document was signed by Community Skilled Healthcare Center on 06/01/17. The document was signed by Mercy Health Youngstown LLC doing business as Saint [NAME] hospital on [DATE].An interview on 04/13/26 at 4:15 P.M. with the Administrator verified the signed date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised in response to resident assessments and physician ordered interventions for Resident #10, Resident #49, Resident #71, and Resident #90. This affected four residents (#10, #49, #71,and #90) of 47 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 83. Findings included:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 09/17/22. Resident #10 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 01/13/26 due to a fracture of the right femur post-fall incident on 01/03/26. Further diagnoses included Alzheimer's dementia, hypertension, anxiety, insomnia, and chronic kidney disease.Review of Resident #10's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition, was independent with eating, and required substantial to maximal assist for oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, showers, dressing. Resident #10 was dependent on staff for putting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #78 was provided one-to-one activities to meet personal needs, and failed to ensure all residents residing on the memory care unit (Residents #4, #5, #8, #10, #13 , #14, #16, #17, #23, #30, #40, #42 , #46, #47, #48, #50, #59, #64 , #65, #66, #68, #72, #83, and #84) received a program of therapeutic activities for their highest practical well-being. This affected 25 residents (Residents #4, #5, #8, #10, #13, #14, #16, #17, #23, #30, #40, #42 , #46, #47, #48, #50, #59, #64 , #65, #66, #68, #72, #78, #83, and #84) of 83 residents observed for activities. The facility census was 83. Findings include: A review of the facility activity calendar labeled February 2026 Dementia Unit revealed on 02/01/26 there were no activities on the calendar. The latest activity scheduled for each day on the dementia unit was at 2:00 P.M. unless it was a holiday, then the latest activity was scheduled at 3:00 P.M. There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 56 citations
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-17 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee personnel file review, review of the facility assessment, review of the facility policy and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff had specialized training for the memory care unit. This had the potential to affect all residents (Residents #4, #5, #8, #10, #13, #14, #16, #17, #23, #30, #40, #42, #46, #47, #48, #50, #59, #64, #65, #66, #68, #72, #83, and #84) residing in the memory care unit The facility census was 83.Findings include: A review of the personnel file for Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #844 revealed a date of hire as 01/28/26. Further review revealed CNA #844 had no specialized training for the memory care unit.A review of the personnel file for CNA #845 revealed a date of hire as 02/25/26. Further review revealed CNA #845 had no specialized training for the memory care unit.A review of the personnel file for CNA #846 revealed a date of hire as 07/31/25. Further review revealed CNA #846 had no specialized training for the memory care unit.A review of the personnel file for CNA #860 revealed a date of hire as 02/25/26. Further review revealed CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and observation the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for Residents #13, #76, and #84. This affected three (Residents #13, #49, and #84) of three residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 83.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #84's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/10/26. Diagnoses included malignant breast cancer, hypothyroidism, hypertension, adult failure to thrive, unspecified dementia, schizophrenia, and age-related osteoporosis.Review of Resident #84's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Resident #84 required setup or clean up assistance with eating, partial to moderate assistance with toileting hygiene, oral hygiene, and showering.An observation on 04/06/26 at 10:40 A.M. of Resident #84's call light revealed it was clipped to the privacy curtain out of reach of the resident.An interview on 04/06/26 at 10:41 A.M. with Resident #84 revealed if she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide written notice of room changes to the resident and family representative. This affected one resident (#79) out of one resident reviewed for room change. The facility census was 83.Findings includeRecord review for Resident #79 revealed an admission date of 07/31/25 with diagnoses including unspecified intellectual disabilities, other seizures, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. Effective 03/11/26 Resident #79's brother was listed as Power of Attorney (POA).Review of Resident #79's progress notes revealed on 03/11/26 a social services entry stated, notified resident of room change. Resident is ok with room change. There was no documentation of evidence that Resident #79 received prior written notice of room change and that Resident's POA was provided written prior notice of room change.Review of a nursing note dated 03/17/26 revealed Resident #79 had a room change done, all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints. This affected one resident (Resident #66) of one resident reviewed for physical restraints. The facility census was 83.Findings include:Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/20/25. Diagnoses included moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, dementia, hyperlipidemia, mood disorder, urinary retention, age related osteoporosis, Alzheimer's disease, and anxiety disorder.Review of Resident #66's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition but was able to make needs known. Resident #66 required partial to moderate assist with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including eating, showers, personal hygiene, dressing, and bed mobility.Review of Resident #66's care plan dated 02/01/26 revealed the resident was at risk for fluctuations and/or decline with ALDs due to multiple health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were notified of bed hold information prior to discharge to the hospital and failed to notify the Ombudsman of hospitalizations. This affected two residents (Residents #2 and #5) of two residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 83. Findings include:1.Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 08/24/23 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, gender identity disorder, and borderline personality disorder.Review of the census data within the medical record revealed Resident #2 was hospitalized from [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. There was no evidence in the record of a bed hold notice. 2.Review of medical record for resident #5 revealed an admission date of 10/14/25 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia.Review of the census data within the medical record for Resident #5 revealed Resident #5 was hospitalized from [DATE] through 04/10/26. There was no evidence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to include discharge planning for Resident #77. This affected one resident (#77) of 47 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 83.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #77 revealed an admission date of 01/22/26. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes mellitus without complications, and obesity.Review of the modification of admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 was cognitively intact, had adequate hearing, was able to make himself understood, and understood others. Review of progress notes in Resident #77's medical record revealed on 02/06/26 a nursing note indicated Resident #77 wanted to return to his assisted living and he wanted to stay at the facility until renovations were completed. An additional nurse progress note dated 02/20/26 revealed a mini care conference took place in Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to administer a proper dose of acetaminophen (analgesic) to Resident #60. This affected one (Resident #60) of six residents observed for medication administration. The facility also failed to address x-rays in a timely manner for Resident #10. This affected one (Resident #10) of two residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 83.Findings include:1.A review of medical records for Resident #60 revealed the date of admission of 01/22/26. Significant diagnosis included osteoarthritis of the knee, unspecified, and pain in unspecified knee. Significant orders included acetaminophen 500 milligrams, give two tablets by mouth two times a day for pain. An admission minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status with a score of 13 indicating Resident #60 was cognitively intact. The assessment also revealed Resident #60 received scheduled pain medication. The pain was rated as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to secure smoking materials for Resident #52. This affected one Resident (#52), who was identified as the facility's only smoker, of one resident reviewed for smoking and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility's census was 83.Findings include:A review of Resident #52's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/13/24 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus type II with hyperglycemia, atherosclerotic heart disease, depression, hypertension (HTN), myocardial infarction (MI), and lesion of the ulnar nerve of the left upper limb.A review of Resident #52's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Further review of the MDS also revealed Resident #52 required set-up/supervision with all activities of daily living and required supervision with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #9's nasal spray was stored in a safe manner. This affected one (Resident #9) of six residents observed during medication administration. In addition, the facility failed to date a multi-dose vial of Tubersol (a liquid that is used to test if someone has been exposed to tuberculosis) in a manner to preserve efficacy. This had the potential to affect all residents who may require tuberculin skin testing using multi-dose vials. The facility census was 83.Findings include:1. A review of medical records for Resident #9 revealed the date of admission as 02/25/26. Significant diagnoses included chronic diastolic congestive heart failure. Significant orders included Fluticasone (corticosteroid nasal spray) 50 micrograms suspension, use one spray in each nostril daily for allergies. There were no orders to leave medications at the bedside of Resident #9.An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dental services were obtained for Resident #4. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of two residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 83.Findings include:A review of the medical records for Resident #4 revealed a date of admission of 03/09/22. Significant diagnosis included Alzheimer's disease with late onset, severe, with agitation.A review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed a signed consent to treat for dental services dated 01/15/26. The consent to treat was signed by the Power of Attorney (POA) for Resident #4 because she wanted the resident fitted for dentures.A care plan dated 03/11/26 revealed Resident #4 to be edentulous (without teeth) and preferred not to wear dentures. Interventions included dental checkups as ordered.A review of an e-mail sent on 03/17/26 to 360 Dental Services from Social Services (SS) #823 revealed 360 Dental Services was contacted to schedule dental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure attractive and palatable pureed food was served to Resident #39. This affected one Resident (#39) of three residents reviewed for food. The facility identified nine residents (#10, #35, #39, #41, #64, #65, #66, #74, #79) as receiving pureed diets. The census was 83.Review of the medical record for Resident #39 revealed an admission date of 04/26/25 with medical diagnoses including diaphragmatic hernia without obstruction or gangrene, other idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy, and moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. The prescribed diet was listed as pureed texture, regular consistency and no added salt. An interview on 04/08/26 at 10:55 A.M. with Resident #39 revealed most days his pureed food was runny and not appealing. Observation on 04/08/26 at 12:39 P.M. of Resident #39's lunch tray revealed there were two pureed food items on the plate that did not hold form. One of the items was a brown circle of runny, thin consistency food (identified as Philadelphia cheesesteak)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure influenza and pneumococcal vaccines were addressed and administered timely for Resident #66. This affected one Resident (#66) of seven residents investigated for timely vaccination administration. The facility census was 83.Findings include:A review of Resident #66's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/20/25 with diagnoses including moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, unspecified dementia, unspecified mood disorder, osteoporosis, late onset Alzheimer's disease and anxiety.A review of Resident #66's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #66 required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) bed mobility and transfers.A review of the immunization records for Resident #66 revealed neither influenza nor pneumococcal vaccines…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a COVID 19 vaccine was addressed and administered timely for Resident #66. This affected one Resident (#66) of seven residents investigated for timely vaccination administration. The facility census was 83.Findings include:A review of Resident #66's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/20/25 with diagnoses including moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, unspecified dementia, unspecified mood disorder, osteoporosis, late onset Alzheimer's disease and anxiety.A review of Resident #66's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out off 15 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #66 required partial to moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADL), bed mobility and transfers.A review of the immunization records for Resident #66 revealed a COVID 19 vaccine had not been addressed or administered even…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of the facility self-reported incident (SRI) and investigation and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident-to-resident abuse did not occur between Resident #52 and Resident #40. This affected two (Residents #40, and #52) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 91. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 04/07/16. Diagnoses included autistic disorder, developmental disorder, anxiety, hypertension and scoliosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was severely cognitively impaired. She required substantial assistance for eating and was dependent for oral care, toileting, showering, dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 03/20/25. Diagnoses included diabetes, depression, high cholesterol, depression and respiratory disorders. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), and review of facility policies the facility failed to ensure residents were free from misappropriation. This affected three residents (Residents #2, #26, and #94) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 91.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #2's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/12/25. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, generalized anxiety disorder, folate deficiency, cognitive communication deficit, hypokalemia, and insomnia.Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was cognitively impaired and required supervision with eating for partial/moderate assistance by staff for all other Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including medication administration.Review of physician orders for Resident #2 dated August 2025 revealed there were no orders for Haldol (an antipsychotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, review of facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement policies related to misappropriation. This affected one Resident (Resident #26) out of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 91.Findings include:Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/24/25. Diagnoses included attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHA), drug induced secondary parkinsonism, lower back pain, bipolar disorder, cervicothoracic fusion of spine, gender identity disorder, borderline personality disorder, seizures, and Tourette's Disorder.Review of Resident #26's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact and was independent with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).Review of Resident #26's Physician orders dated March 2025 revealed the resident was ordered Amphetamine-Dextroamphetamine (Adderall) 20 milligrams (mg) twice daily at 8:00 A.M. and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of the facility self-reported incident (SRI) and investigation and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of resident-to-resident abuse. This affected two (Residents number #40 and #52) of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 91. Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 04/07/16. Diagnoses included autistic disorder, developmental disorder, anxiety, hypertension and scoliosis. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40 was severely cognitively impaired. She required substantial assistance for eating and was dependent for oral care, toileting, showering, dressing and personal hygiene. Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 03/20/25. Diagnoses included diabetes, depression, high cholesterol, depression and respiratory disorders. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #93 received a safe and complete discharge process. This affected one resident (Resident #93) out of four residents reviewed for discharge. The facility census was 91.Review of Resident #93's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/03/25 and a discharge date to home on [DATE]. Diagnosis included Rhabdomyolysis, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, hypertensive chronic kidney disease stage V, seizures, hypothyroidism, anemia, hyperfunction of pituitary gland, urinary retention, hyperlipidemia, diabetes insipidus, and hypopituitarism.Review of Resident #93's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had cognitive impairment and required set up or clean up assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).Review of Resident #93's progress notes dated 11/03/25 authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #222) revealed she was the nurse who discharged Resident #93…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet the needs of all residents. This affected three (Residents #35, #67 and #69) of six residents reviewed for showers and had the potential to affect all 75 residents in the facility. Findings include: Interview on 06/10/25 at 8:31 A.M. with certified nurse aide (CNA) #200 revealed she had several residents who required a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift) for transfer, assistance with feeding and activities of daily living (ADL) care. She revealed showers often did not get done because there was not enough staff to complete them. Interview with Resident #69 and family on 06/10/25 at 10:33 A.M. revealed the resident did not receive bathing per their preferred method or frequency. Resident #69's family indicated they have voiced concerns to floor staff and facility administration. Interview on 06/10/25 at 10:46 A.M. with CNAs #203 and #204 reviewed facility staffing was horrible. CNA #204…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility schedule and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was in the facility for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. This had the potential to affect all 75 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the schedules for May 2025 as well as the staffing tool for the weeks of 05/11/25 and 05/18/25 revealed the facility did not have an RN scheduled to work on 05/13/25. One RN worked 7.25 hours on 05/23/25. Interview on 06/11/25 at 2:13 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified she had no other evidence to verify an RN had worked eight consecutive hours on 05/13/25 or 05/23/25. This deficiency was an incidental finding identified during the complaint investigation.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of the Facility Assessment and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was updated annually. This had the potential to affect all 75 residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment revealed a date of 04/18/22. Interview on 06/11/25 at 11:59 A.M. with the Administrator revealed he forgot to change the date on the Facility Assessment. He could provide no evidence the Facility Assessment had been updated since 04/18/22. This deficiency is an incidental finding identified during the complaint investigation.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the responsible party, Power of Attorney (POA) or emergency contact of resident transfers to the hospital. This affected two (Residents #10 and #51) of three residents reviewed for notification. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 11/19/24. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, kidney disease and anemia. His sister was his emergency contact. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact. He required set up help for eating and was dependent on staff for toileting, showering, dressing and hygiene. Review of the nursing progress note dated 06/03/25 at 6:45 A.M. revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the hospital due to a urinary tract infection. There was no documented evidence Resident #10's responsible party, POA or emergency contact was notified. Interview on 06/11/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to send information to the hospital regarding resident health status upon transfer. This affected two (Residents #10 and #51) of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 11/19/24. Diagnoses included quadriplegia, kidney disease and anemia. His sister was his emergency contact. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 was cognitively intact. He required set up help for eating and was dependent on staff for toileting, showering, dressing and hygiene. Review of the nursing progress note dated 06/03/25 at 6:45 A.M. revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the hospital due to a urinary tract infection. 2. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 05/22/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, kidney disease, anemia, depression and high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received baths or showers per resident preference. This affected three (Resident #35, Resident #67, and Resident #69) out of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Findings include: 1. Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphasia (a language disorder that affects a person's ability to speak following cerebrovascular disease (stroke), aphasia (a disorder that impacts ability to speak, understand, read, or write) following cerebrovascular disease (stroke), and contracture (deformities caused by tightening or shortening of muscles) of arms. Interview with Resident #69 and family on 06/10/25 at 10:33 A.M. revealed the resident does not bathing per their preferred method or frequency. Resident #69 and family noted their preferred bathing method is a tub bath. Resident #69's family indicated they have voiced concerns to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders to prevent skin breakdown were being followed. This affected one resident (Resident #9) out of three residents that were sampled for skin breakdown. The facility census was 75. Findings include: Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included encounter for palliative care, cerebral atherosclerosis (narrowing of the arteries supplying blood to the brain from fat build up), vascular dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and atherosclerotic heart disease (a narrowing of the arteries supplying blood to the heart from fat build up). Review of the care plan revealed on 07/12/24 Resident #9 had potential for pressure ulcer development and or alteration in skin integrity related to decreased mobility and fragile skin and an intervention to reposition on rounds and as needed. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment noted the following: Section C dated 04/10/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure falls were thoroughly investigated. This affected two (Residents #22 and #51) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 75. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 04/18/25. Diagnoses included diabetes, heart disease, high cholesterol, anxiety, depression and chronic back pain. Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was at risk for falls. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 was cognitively intact. She required set up help for eating, oral and personal hygiene and partial to moderate assistance for toileting. Review of the care plan dated 04/21/25 revealed Resident #22 was at risk for falls due to impaired safety awareness and age-related weakness. Interventions included anticipating the residents' needs, ensuring the call light was within reach and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), review of the facility investigation, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure thorough investigations were completed regarding diversion of narcotics and a resident-to-resident altercation. The facility also failed to ensure preventative and corrective measures were in place. This affected three residents (# 11, #61 and #72) of four residents who were investigated for abuse and misappropriation. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 04/08/24 with diagnoses including kidney disease stage three, retention of urine, acute chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, and other seizures. Significant orders included admit to hospice with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure dated 06/13/24, check fentanyl patch (opioid pain medication) placement every shift, morphine sulfate oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a registered nurse (RN) on duty for at least eight consecutive hours, seven days a week as required. This had the potential to affect all 80 residents. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the staff schedule for 08/04/24 revealed there was no RN scheduled in the building for first, second or third shift. Review of the facility Daily Staffing Sheet dated 08/04/24 revealed no ancillary or licensed registered nurse was scheduled 08/04/24 and review of employee time card punch in and out for 08/04/24 revealed nine licensed practical nurses (LPN) punched in and out on 08/04/24, twenty state tested nurse aids (STNA) punched in and out on 08/04/24 and one registered nurse (RN) punched in at 10:54 P.M. on 08/04/24 and punched out at 7:35 A.M. on 08/05/24. Interview on 08/19/24 at 10:50 A.M. with Staffing Coordinator #560 confirmed the schedule did not have any RN listed at least eight hours a day on 08/04/24. Interview on 08/20/24 at 11:02 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON ) confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-26 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, and interview, the facility failed to accurately code MDS assessments for five residents (#5, #11, #51, #71 and #73) of seven residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility census was 80. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral atherosclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), seizures, heart disease, gastric reflux, generalized anxiety disorder, and vascular dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #5 revealed she was admitted to hospice upon admission [DATE]) with a diagnosis of end stage cerebral atherosclerosis. Review of the annual MDS 3.0 comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Section J Health Conditions revealed Resident #5 did not have a life expectancy of less…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview the facility failed to maintain Resident #36's right to a dignified existence. This affected one resident (Resident #36) of the three residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including memory deficit, morbid obesity, hypertensive congestive heart failure, and major depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 had intact cognition and was always incontinent of urine and frequently incontinent of bowel. Review of the physician order dated 02/02/23 for Resident #36 revealed an order for Lasix (a diuretic) 40 milligrams by mouth daily. Interview on 08/20/24 at 9:00 A.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #513 revealed Resident #36 urinated frequently due to being on a diuretic and even with frequent incontinence care every two hours, she was frequently wet with urine which caused a strong odor of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #37 was provided adequate assistance during ambulation to prevent a fall and that fall risk evaluations/assessments were completed at least quarterly. This affected one resident (#37) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 11/30/21 with diagnoses including dementia, major depression, history of falling, hypertension and anxiety. Review of physical therapy Discharge summary dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 was able to ambulate with a front wheeled walker 100 feet with minimum assistance. Review of the Minimum Data Set ( MDS) 3.0 quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 had impaired cognition, and required maximum assistance by staff to walk 10 feet and to walk 50 feet and turn twice. She also required maximum assistance to come to a standing position from sitting and transfer from chair to bed. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain sufficient nursing services staff to meet the total care needs of residents according to their plan of care. This affected six residents (#4, #10, #32, #44, #72 and #79) and had the potential to affect all 78 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment (dated 05/16/24) revealed the average daily census at the facility was 85. On page three and four of the assessment, the staffing plan was outlined and indicated to meet the acuity needs of the residents, the licensed nurses and State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNA) would provide a range of 3.28 to 4.78 hours of direct resident care per resident per day. Interview on 07/01/24 at 3:22 P.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #808 revealed staff were unable to complete showers due to the facility getting rid of the shower aides. She stated residents might get bed baths, but they do not get showers. STNA #808 stated the facility was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility administration did not ensure proper management of all resources for the highest practicable wellbeing of all residents which included failure to eradicate bed bugs, failure to ensure sufficient nursing staff to meet the resident's acuity needs, and failure to ensure resident rooms were maintained in a manner to protect the resident right to a safe, clean, comfortable environment. This had the potential to affect all 78 residents living in the facility. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the undated job description for the Administrator revealed it was the essential function of the Administrator to enforce implementation of policies and procedures, supervise all department supervisors and administrative staff, assume responsibility with department supervisors to ensure adequate staffing, and establish systems to ensure compliance with all state, federal and local regulations. Review of the undated job description for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, shower schedule review, review of facility policy and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received showers per schedule or preference. This affected six Residents (#4, #10, #32, #44, #72 and #79) out of six Residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 12/04/23. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety, chronic pain, hypertension, unspecified intellectual disabilities, and hypothyroidism. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/2024, revealed Resident #4 to have intact cognition. He was assessed to be independent for most of their activities of daily living (ADL). He was assessed to need partial assistance by staff for personal hygiene and showers. Review of Resident #4's plan of care initiated on 03/05/24, revealed the resident preferred not to take a shower and stated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, maintenance log review, medical record reviews, and staff and resident interviews the facility failed to ensure the walls in the resident rooms for Resident #1 and Resident #79 were in good repair. This affected two residents (Residents #1 and Resident #79) of eleven residents reviewed for physical environment. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 04/26/24. The diagnoses included hypertensive urgency, chronic kidney disease, acute kidney failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, history of blood clot to lower extremities, disease of pancreas, and cholelithiasis without obstruction. Review of Resident #1's Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had slight cognitive impairment. She required set up or clean up assistance with eating, she was supervision or touching assistance with oral hygiene, toileting, dressing, and bed mobility. She required partial to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-23 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review and review of exterminator invoices the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for bed bugs. This affected one resident (Resident #4) of eleven residents reviewed for physical environment and had the potential to affect the additional 77 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission date of 12/04/23. Diagnoses included rash and other nonspecific skin eruption, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and hypothyroidism. Review of Resident #4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. He was independent with eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, dressing, and bed mobility. Resident #4 required partial assistance for showers and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #4's physician orders dated 06/03/24 revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen to prepare food in a manner to prevent contamination and food borne illness. This had the potential to affect 80 residents who receive food from the kitchen. The facility identified zero residents who did not eat by mouth. The facility census was 80. Findings include: On 05/13/24 at 8:15 A.M. a tour of the kitchen revealed a floor with built up dirt and debris in the dry storage area underneath the shelves. There was a half of a five-pound bag of macaroni opened and unlabeled, a quarter bag of shell macaroni opened and unlabeled. There was cornstarch in a 20-gallon lidded receptacle with a pan in it for scooping. The three-sink sanitation station had two containers of Hydrion strips (test strips to test the chemical levels for proper sanitization) with expiration dates of 07/01/20 and 05/31/19. The standup refrigerator located in the kitchen revealed one half of a five-pound brick of queso cheese that was opened and unlabeled. There was a 500-milliliter bottle of Pepsi that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, policy review, and review of the facility's investigation notes, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were not misappropriated. This affected two current residents (Residents #20 and #33) and two former residents (Residents #234 and #332) who resided on the one-hundred hall and had the potential to affect seven additional residents ( #26, #50, #54, #59, #67, #68, and #79) the facility identified as receiving controlled substances from the one hundred medication cart. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an initial admission date of 03/11/24 and a facility re-entry date of 04/26/24 with diagnoses including non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, heart failure, stage three pressure ulcer of the sacral region, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiomyopathy, and osteoarthritis of the right hip. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) facility self-reported incidents (SRIs), the facility failed to file an SRI report related to allegations of misappropriation affecting four residents (Residents #20 and #33 and Former Residents #234, and #332) out of five residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #20 revealed an initial admission date of 03/11/24 and a facility re-entry date of 04/26/24 with diagnoses including non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, heart failure, stage three pressure ulcer of the sacral region, morbid obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cardiomyopathy, and osteoarthritis of the right hip. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #20 had intact cognition, frequently experienced pain that interfered with sleep and participation in day-to-day activities for which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record reviews, review of the memorandum from the Department of Health & Human Services and review of guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed for Resident #14, #27, #41, #53, #69 and #78 who required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and Resident #55 who required blood glucose monitoring. This affected seven residents (#14, #27, #53,#69, #55 and #78) out of 80 residents observed for infection control. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Observation on 05/13/24 at 10:23 A.M. of Resident #27 in the resident room revealed Resident #27 had an indwelling urinary cathetar. There was personal protective equipment (PPE) available in a hanging storage unit over the door and a unit to the left of the entrance door which contained PPE. Containers for used PPE were located outside of the room to the right of the entrance door. There was no visible sign to denote the type of transmission-based precaution (TBP) required. Interview with Activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to self-administer medications was clinically appropriate. This affected one Resident (#78) of eight residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 01/22/24 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, cellulitis of the right nd left lower limbs, chronic pressure ulcers with necrosis of the muscle of both feet, gangrene, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and asthma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 had intact cognition and had asthma. Review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 01/22/24 for albuterol sulfate inhalation aerosol solution 108 (90 base) micrograms (mcg) per actuation, two puffs inhaled orally every six hours as needed for shortness of breath (SOB) related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure resident choices related to advanced directives were honored. This affected one resident (Resident #78) of two reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, cellulitis of the right nd left lower limbs, chronic pressure ulcers with necrosis of the muscle of both feet, gangrene, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and asthma. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on [DATE] revealed Resident #78 had intact cognition and was independent with personal care. Review of the physician orders revealed an active order dated [DATE] designating Resident #78 as a full code. Review of the progress note dated [DATE] revealed the Social Services Designee (SSD) discussed advanced directives with Resident #78 on this date. During the care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to change nasal cannula oxygen tubing in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#39) of one resident reviewed for oxygen use. The facility identified 18 residents (#2, #14, #21, #22, #24, #27, #30, #33, #39, #41, #50, #51, #52, #60, #63, #67, #76 and #132) utilizing oxygen. The facility census was 80. Findings include: A review of medical records for Resident #39 revealed a date of admission of 02/13/23. Significant diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure. Significant orders included, change oxygen tubing weekly (Tuesdays) and oxygen at two liters per minute per nasal cannula (a tubing system with two prongs inserted in the nose for oxygen delivery) as needed for shortness of breath. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 had severe cognitive impairment. A care plan dated 04/12/24 revealed Resident #39 was at risk for ineffective breathing related to heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-03 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, review of Authorization for Release of Specialized Privileged Information and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide copies of the medical record to Resident #8's representative. This affected one resident (#8) of one resident reviewed for medical record requests. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #8 revealed an admission date of 07/19/22. Medical diagnoses included cerebral atherosclerosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, generalized anxiety disorder, and vascular dementia. Review of the emergency contacts for Resident #8 revealed the resident's daughter was the only emergency contact listed. Review of the medical record did not contain documented evidence that the facility processed a request for medical records to be received by Resident #8's representative. Interview on 04/02/24 at 10:51 P.M. with Resident #8's representative revealed she made a verbal request to the Administrator for release of medical records related to dental services provided at the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of self-reported incident (SRI) and facility policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of sexual abuse as required. This affected one resident (#47) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 03/04/24. Diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, epilepsy, essential hypertension, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #47 was severely cognitively impaired and had hallucinations. Review of SRI #245110 dated 03/11/24 revealed Resident #47 alleged she had been raped. She was interviewed by three different staff members on three different occasions, all findings were inconclusive. Further review of SRI #245110 revealed no documented evidence of a skin assessment for Resident #47 and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #64 was provided showers according to his needs and preferences. This affected one resident (Resident #64) out of eight residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 89. Findings include: Review of Resident #64's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/05/23 with diagnoses including hypertension, chronic kidney disease stage one, hemiplegia following a cerebrovascular accident, obstructive sleep apnea, and aphagia. Review of Resident #64's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition and was dependent on two staff members for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including showering. Review of the facility Shower Schedule revealed Resident #64 was to receive showers on Monday and Thursday each week. Review of Resident #64's shower sheets revealed at no point did he receive a shower in the shower room. He had only received bed baths which were not his preference.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, Self-Reported Incident (SRI) tracking number (#)240778 review, facility investigation review, Police Report #23-23497 review, and review of the abuse policy the facility failed to ensure Resident #6 was free from staff to resident abuse. This affected one resident (#6) out of six residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 86. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 07/08/23 with diagnoses including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), Parkinson's disease, hypertension, and diabetes. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #6 had intact cognition as his Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was a 15 out of 15. He had no behaviors documented. He required extensive assistance from two staff with bed mobility and transfers. He required total assistance from one staff with toileting. He was unable to ambulate. He was occasionally incontinent of urine but always…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, personnel file review, interview, and review of the Ohio Board of Nursing website the facility failed to ensure medications were administered by a licensed nurse. This affected 42 residents (#2, #6, #10, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #20, #23, #25, #27, #30, #31, #35, #36, #37, #40, #42, #44, #45, #46, #47, #51, #53, #55, #57, #58, #60, #63, #64, #65, #69, #70, #73, #74, #75, #76, #77, and #78). The facility census was 82. Findings include: An interview with the Administrator on [DATE] at 8:47 A.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #447 was terminated on [DATE] for not having a valid nursing license. The Administrator stated that RN #447 had worked over the weekend of [DATE] to [DATE]. The Administrator further stated that RN #447's nursing license expired on [DATE]. Review of RN #447's nursing license on the Ohio Board of Nursing website revealed RN #477's nursing license expired on [DATE]. Review of employee file for RN #477 revealed, on [DATE] RN #477 was terminated from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #41's physician was notified timely on radiographic findings. This affected one (Resident #41) of four residents reviewed for notification. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 07/11/22 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus and absence of left leg below the knee. Review of the fall investigation dated 08/26/23 at 6:00 A.M. revealed Resident #41 updated the nurse that his left wrist, hand and forearm had discomfort. He stated during a transfer prior to dialysis that morning, the mechanical hoyer lift was mistakenly released too quickly and he ended up on the floor. Resident #41's physician was updated, and an X-ray was ordered. The staff were educated on proper mechanical hoyer lift use. Review of the nursing progress note dated 08/26/23 at 12:05 P.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #205 was updated upon Resident #41's return…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff properly transferred Resident #41 with a mechanical hoyer lift and failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed following Resident #41's fall from the mechanical hoyer lift. This affected one (Resident #41) of three residents reviewed for falls and mechanical lift transfers. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #41 revealed an admission date of 07/11/22 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus and absence of left leg below the knee. Review of Resident #41's care plan dated 07/26/22 revealed he was at risk for falls related to left below the knee amputation and weakness. Interventions included, but not limited to, to transfer him by two staff members with a mechanical lift for all transfers. Review of the physician's order dated 07/27/22 revealed Resident #41 was to be transferred with a mechanical lift with two staff for all transfers. Review of the fall investigation dated 08/26/23 at 6:00 A.M. revealed Resident #41…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #86 had oxygen orders from the physician corresponding to the oxygen she was utilizing. This affected one (Resident #86) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 85. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 08/21/23 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), acute and chronic respiratory failure and pneumonia. She was discharged back to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of Resident #86's physician's orders dated 08/21/23 revealed an order for oxygen at two liters per minute per nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for August 2023, revealed Resident #86 had an order for oxygen at two liters as needed but was not signed off as utilized by the nursing staff. Review of the nursing progress notes dated from 08/21/23 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review, and interview the facility failed to ensure all employees were checked against the Ohio Nurse Aide Registry (NAR) prior to or on their first day of work/hire to ensure the employee did not have a finding entered into the NAR concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents, or misappropriation of their property as required. This had the potential to affect all 76 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Hospitality Aide (HA) #471 revealed a hire date of 07/12/22. There was no printed evidence HA #471 was checked against the NAR prior to the first day of work/hire. Review of the personnel file for Registered Nurse (RN) #496 revealed a hire date of 07/12/22. There was no printed evidence RN #496 was checked against the NAR prior to the first day of work/hire. Review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #443 revealed a hire date of 07/12/22. There was no printed evidence LPN #443 was checked against the NAR prior to the first day of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #5's guardian was notified when she was sent to the hospital. This affected one (Resident #5) of three residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Residents #5, #55 and #70). The facility census was 76. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #5 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia with behavioral disturbance, congestive heart failure, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Resident #5 had a physician order dated 12/05/21 for enteral nourishment (tube feeding) Glucerna 1.2 continuous at 55 cubic centimeters (cc)cc/ hour (hr). Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Summary (MDS) 3.0 assessment of 08/01/22 revealed Resident #5 was severely cognitively impaired, continuous altered level of consciousness, required total dependence of two staff, and received 51 percent (%) or more of her total calories received through parenteral or tube feeding. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #71 was free of staff to resident verbal abuse. This affected one (Resident #71) of three residents (Residents #4, #17, and #71) reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 76. Findings included: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #71 revealed an admission date of 11/03/21 and discharge date of 08/18/22 to another facility. Diagnoses included quadriplegia from a previous gunshot injury, diabetes, and anxiety disorder. Review of the care plan dated 11/04/21 revealed Resident #71 had a deficit in activities of daily living self-performance related quadriplegia. Intervention included extensive assist of two staff with bathing, total dependence of two staff with a mechanical lift for transfers, praise all efforts at self-care. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 had intact cognition and had no behaviors documented. He required total dependence of two staff with bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-06-12 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted timely and accurately. This had the potential to affect all 75 residents in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 06/10/25 at 8:31 A.M. revealed the daily posted staffing information was posted for 06/09/25 and did not identify the facility census. Interview at the time of the observation with the Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) #200 confirmed the daily staffing information posted was for 06/09/25 and had not yet been updated for the current day. She revealed the scheduler was responsible for updating the posted staffing information, and she was on vacation as of this date. She also confirmed that a census number was not listed on the information displayed. This deficiency is an incidental finding identified during the complaint investigation.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-05-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, review of personnel files and policy review, the facility failed develop and implement policies and procedures to include checking references of three employees to identify if an employee had a finding concerning abuse, neglect, exploitation, mistreatment of residents or misappropriation of resident property. This had the potential to affect all 80 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 80. Findings include: On 05/15/24 between 12:00 P.M. and 12:30 P.M. a review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 361 revealed a date of hire of 04/04/24. The personnel file contained no reference checks. Payroll Coordinator (PC) #374 verified there were no reference checks for LPN #361 at the time of the personnel file review. On 05/15/24 between 12:00 P.M. and 12:30 P.M. a review of the personnel file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 362 revealed a date of hire of 04/15/24. The personnel file contained no reference checks. Payroll Coordinator (PC) #374 verified there were no reference checks for LPN #362 at the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$198,318 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $26,685 — penalty dated 2026-03-04
- $171,633 — penalty dated 2024-05-16
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-05-14 for 26 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-08 for 29 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YYAM HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 12/31/2024 |
| YYAM IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 95% | since 12/31/2024 |
| NUSSBAUM, MATTISYAHU | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2024 |
| LUXOR HEALTHCARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2024 |
| REYNOLDS, ROGER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2024 |
| SHAH, VIJAYKUMAR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2024 |
| COMPLIANCE CONSULTING GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2024 |
| CS PROPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2024 |
| HOWARD, WESHBALE & CO. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2024 |
| JAMMA CONSULTING INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/31/2024 |
| WEINSTOCK, MINDI | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/06/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365412. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.