Gillette Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 20.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 48 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 17% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 90.4 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to conduct complete and thorough post-fall investigations to mitigate risk of falls . This affected one resident (Resident #94) of four residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 93.Findings include: Record review for Resident #94 revealed an admission date of 05/23/25 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, anxiety, difficulty walking, malnutrition and right femur fracture. Pertinent physician orders included non-skid pad to wheelchair, body pillow to open side of bed, non-skid pad to wheelchair cushion, floor mat to open side of bed, non-skid socks on at all times, brake sentry to wheelchair, and physical therapy evaluate and treat.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #94 had moderate cognitive impairment, had a fall with fracture prior to admission and had a fall since admission. Resident #94 was incontinent bladder.Review of Resident #94's plan of care, date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility did not ensure all shower rooms used by residents were maintained at comfortable temperatures. This affected four residents (Residents #4, #9, #23 and #26) and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility excluding 37 residents ( #1, #2, #3,#8, #10, #12, #13, #15, #16, #17, #21, #24, #25, #27, #34, #35, #38, #42, #43, #46, #50, #51, #54, #56, #58, #59, #61, #62, #64, #66, #70, #72, #73, #77, #78, #80, and #84) the facility identified as having personal showers in their resident rooms. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. A facility tour was conducted on 03/24/25 at 10:30 A.M. with Maintanence Director (MD) #257 and revealed the facility had two shower rooms for resident use. The first shower room observed was between the 400 and 500 unit hallways. MD #257 took the ambient temperature in the shower room and stated it was 64.8 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The second shower room observed was between the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely report an allegation of misappropriation of narcotic medications to the appropriate state agency. This affected two residents (#33 and #65) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility identified an additional 21 residents (#7, #14, #17, #18, #24, #26, #28, #31, #32, #59,#60, #68, #69, #74, #75, #76, #77, #80, #81, #83 and #85) as having physician orders for narcotic medications. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. A review of medical records for Resident #33 revealed a date of initial admission of 01/29/24, and a readmission date of 01/12/25 with diagnoses including cirrhosis of the liver, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic viral hepatitis, hepatomegaly (liver enlargement) and cognitive communication deficit. Review of physician orders revealed orders for Norco oral tablet 5-325 milligrams (a synthetic opioid and painkiller), give one tablet by mouth every six…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of facility policy the facility did not ensure Resident #26 received adequate supervision and assistance by staff when being transferred with a mechanical lift, and did not ensure adequate supervision was provided, fall interventions were in place at all times, and complete and thorough post-fall investigations including root cause analysis were done to prevent falls for Resident #77. This affected two residents (Residents #26 and #77) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 87. Findings include: 1. Record review was conducted for Resident #26 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-traumatic extradural hemorrhage, atrial fibrillation, anxiety, depression, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur dated 10/31/24, panic disorder, obesity, muscle wasting, need for assistance with personal care, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications remained in original packaging. This affected one resident (Resident #77) of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 87. Findings include: A review of medical records for Resident #77 revealed a date of admission of 12/19/24 with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, repeated falls and dementia with mild psychotic disturbance. Review of physician orders dated 12/19/24 revealed an order for nuplazid (a medication used to treat hallucinations and delusions associated with Parkinson's disease psychosis) 34 milligrams one capsule by mouth daily to start on 12/20/24. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 had severe cognitive impairment. There were no hallucinations, delusions or behaviors noted. On 03/24/25 at 12:02 P.M. an interview with the daughter of Resident #77 revealed she obtained the nuplazid from a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure showers were provided on a consistent basis for Residents #51 and #51. This affected one resident (#51) of three residents reviewed for showers. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 02/10/22 with diagnoses including heart failure, diabetes, kidney disease, unsteadiness on feet, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 was cognitively intact. He was independent in eating, required setup help for eating, substantial assistance for toileting, partial assistance for showering and supervision for personal hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 12/13/24 revealed Resident #51 had a self-care performance deficit due to functional mobility, and lower extremity weakness. Interventions included assistance with bathing. Resident #51 preferred to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0712 — isolated
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician visited Resident #36 as required. This affected one resident (#36) of three residents reviewed for physician services. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #36 revealed an admission date of 10/28/24 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, diabetes, anxiety, hypertension, and cancer of the head, neck and face. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] reveal Resident #36 was cognitively intact. He was independent and eating, required setup help for oral hygiene, partial to moderate assistance for personal hygiene, and was dependent on staff for toileting and showering. Review of the physicians' notes revealed Resident #36 was last seen by his physician on 11/06/24. Interview on 02/19/24 at 7:54 A.M. with Resident #36 revealed he had not been seen by the physician since he was admitted to the facility. (The medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure [NAME] #204 washed her hands after leaving Resident #45's room and entering Resident #23's room. This affected two residents (#23 and #45) out of four residents reviewed for infection control and had the potential to affect 23 residents (#6, #7, #9, #10, #14, #18, #19, #22, #23, #30, #32, #36, #37, #38, #41, #45, #56, #66, #71, #72, #74, #76 and #78) identified by the facility that were on EBP. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Observation on 02/19/25 at 1:46 P.M. of the 500-hall revealed [NAME] #204 was in Resident #45's room talking with her. [NAME] #204 exited resident #45's room and walked down the hall and into Resident #23's room. There was a sign indicating EBP on the outside of Resident #23's room. An interview with [NAME] #204, upon exiting Resident #23's room, revealed she did see the sign indicating Resident #23 was on EBP; however, she did not wash her hands before or when entering the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident #80 was fed in a dignified manner. This affected one resident (#80) out of 20 residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #80 revealed an admission date of 06/06/23 and diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, Bell's Palsy (a neurological disorder that causes paralysis or weakness on one side of the face), unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, other specified depressive episodes, other idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy (condition that affects the nerves in the hands and feet causing pain, numbness, and weakness), unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #80 was severely impaired cognitively and was dependent on staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain resident records in a manner that would protect their confidentiality. This affected one resident (Resident #7) of the 94 residents observed for privacy. The facility census was 94. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 10/17/07 and a re-entry date of 03/08/24 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, schizophrenia, recurrent depressive disorder, osteoporosis, hypertension, diverticulitis, unspecified phobia, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment completed on 07/26/24 revealed Resident #7 had intact cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #7 required supervision or touching assistance for toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing her lower body and transfers to the toilet or from the toilet. Resident #7 used a walker and required supervision or touching assistance for toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing her lower body, and transfers to the toilet or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $840K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH