No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cedarvale Commons Rehabilitation and Healthcare Ce

375 Glenn Avenue, Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 · For profit - Corporation · 92 certified beds · (740) 335-9270 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (740) 335-9270 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607) — most recent Jul 2025Resident-funds citation (F0567)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1510 Columbus Ave · (740) 335-1210 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1795 Columbus Ave · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1151 Columbus Ave · (740) 335-8220 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
525 Glenn Ave · (740) 333-3230

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.5%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.4%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms19.4%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.8%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.0%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.5%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.3%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%3.4%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.5%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.7%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.2%75.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.9%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.1%12.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.141.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.731.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 26 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.0%CMS range 40.7–68.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.5–15.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 3.1–12.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.681.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.67
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.10
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.21
RN hoursweekends
36.5%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 72.3 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.10 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

26
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-09)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2022-10-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-09 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Aides (CNA) had annual performance evaluations. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 64. Findings include 1. Review of the employee file for CNA #120 revealed she began employment on 04/09/24 The employee file revealed no documented evidence of a completed annual performance evaluation. 2. Review of the employee file for CNA #81 revealed she began employment on 07/05/23. The employee file revealed no documented evidence of completed annual performance evaluations. Interview on 06/24/25 at 3:30 P.M. with the Director of Nursing verified no evaluations were in the employee files for CNA #81 and #120. Interview on 06/24/25 at 4:20 P.M. with the Administrator verified evaluations were electronic and disappeared and facility was unable to provide any evidence of them being completed. Review of facility policy titled Performance Evaluations dated September 2021 revealed the job performance of employees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, review of dietary production spreadsheets, review of resident meal tickets, and review of the facility's always available menu, the facility failed to ensure portion sizes were served as planned, which had the potential to affect all residents. The facility also failed to ensure items on the always available menu were available for Resident #17 and Resident #37. This affected two residents (#17 and #37) out of 64 residents observed during dining. The facility also failed to ensure the meal served matched the meal ticket. This affected two Residents (#10 and #21) of three observed for meal tickets. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Observations on 06/17/25 from 11:05 A.M. to 11:35 A.M. revealed four ounce scoops were utilized for the pureed and regular broccoli. When [NAME] #125 was serving the meal and scooped the pureed and regular broccoli, she was not filling the entire scoop. Interview on 06/17/25 at 11:35 A.M., [NAME] #125 verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff wore hair nets in the kitchen as appropriate. This had the potential to affect all 64 residents in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 06/16/25 at 8:25 A.M. revealed [NAME] #135 preparing food in the kitchen. [NAME] #135 had long hair, pulled back, and was not observed to be wearing a hairnet. Observation on 06/16/25 at 8:37 A.M. revealed Dietary Aid (DA) #134 pouring juice into individual glasses. DA #134 had long hair, pulled back, and was not observed to be wearing a hairnet. Interview on 06/16/25 at 8:38 A.M., [NAME] #135 verified herself and DA #134 were not wearing hair nets. [NAME] #35 stated staff ran out of hair nets over the weekend and they were unable to get more as they were locked in the manager's office. Interview on 06/16/25 at 8:45 A.M., Dietary Director (DD) #101 verified the staff did not have access to the hair nets as they were locked up, because when she leaves them out, they go missing. DD #101 verified staff should wear hair nets upon entering the kitchen.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-09 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides completed 12 hours of annual in-services. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the employee file for Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #120 revealed she began employment on 04/09/24. The employee file had no evidence of any continuing education. 2. Review of employee file for Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #81 revealed she began employment on 07/05/23. The employee file had no evidence of any continuing education. Interview on 06/24/25 at 3:30 P.M. with the Director of Nursing verified there was no documented evidence of continuing education in the employee files for CNA #81 and CNA #120. Interview on 06/24/25 at 4:20 P.M. with the Administrator verified the continuing education was done on Relias (online education system) with the previous management company and he was unsure if the facility would have access to it. He further confirmed the facility was unable to provide any evidence of continuing education being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed in a timely manner. This affected four residents (#17, #47, #54, and #60) of four residents reviewed for timely MDS completion. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #60 revealed an admission date of 02/09/24. Diagnoses included cervical spinal cord injury (C4), quadriplegia, morbid obesity, and chronic osteomyelitis of coccyx. Review of Resident #60's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition. The resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Further review of the MDS assessment revealed the assessment was completed on 06/09/25. Interview on 06/18/25 at 2:59 P.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/MDS Coordinator #96 verified Resident #60's MDS assessment, dated 05/17/25 was not completed until 06/09/25. LPN #96 stated MDS assessments should be locked within 14 days of the reference…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated/revised as needed and accurate. This affected four (#4, #10, #21, and #55) of 22 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility also failed to ensure care conferences were held on a routine basis. This affected three (#10, #50 and #162) of four residents reviewed for care conferences. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 07/30/24. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, Parkinson's disease, and epilepsy. Review of Resident #55's 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition. Review of physician orders revealed an order dated 05/15/25 for Resident #55 to be a Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care Arrest (DNR-CCA) code status, indicating the resident would receive comfort care, but no resuscitation efforts in the event of cardiac or pulmonary arrest.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure fall investigations were completed thoroughly, included a root cause analysis, and appropriate fall interventions were initiated and in place. This affected four residents (#21, #25, #38, and #162) of five reviewed for falls. The facility census was 64. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 05/24/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's dysphagia, muscle wasting, diabetes and malnutrition. Review of the care plan dated 12/17/24 revealed Resident #21 was at risk for falls with interventions including to monitor for changes in mobility added on 12/17/24, food and fluids within reach added on 12/17/24, education on transfer and ambulation techniques added on 12/17/24, implement preventative fall interventions added on 12/17/24, resident and staff education on safety interventions added on 01/09/25, non-skid strips added on 01/23/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. a. Review of the record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date 10/05/23. Diagnoses included type two diabetes and developmental disorder of scholastic skills. Review of Resident #59's physician order dated 12/09/24 revealed that Resident #59 had an order for Insulin Lispro injection solution 100 unit per milliliter subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for diabetes. Review of the plan of care dated 04/03/25 revealed that Resident #59 had impaired metabolic status related to diabetes. Interventions included administering medication as ordered, monitoring laboratory results, monitoring vital signs, and reporting adverse side effects to the physician. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #59 had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 that indicated she was cognitively intact. b. Review of the record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date 01/05/24. Diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus and chronic systolic heart failure.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure education was provided prior to offering the influenza and pneumococcal vaccines for four residents (#19, #26, #38, and #162) out of five residents reviewed for vaccines. The facility had a census of 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #162 revealed an admission date of 11/14/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 1 diabetes mellitus without complications, atherosclerotic heart disease, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. Review of the immunization records revealed Resident #162 received the pneumococcal vaccine (Prevnar 20), intramuscular suspension, 0.5 mL, administered one time for pneumonia prophylaxis on 06/24/25. There was no evidence the resident received education…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure written authorization forms for the facility to manage resident funds were appropriately completed for three residents (#34, #55, and #188). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure one resident (#55) received his monthly $50 allowance. The facility census was 54. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 07/30/24. Diagnoses included epilepsy, anxiety, dementia, diabetes, psychotic disorder, and heart failure. Review of the fund authorization form dated 11/25/24 revealed it was signed by Resident #55 with no witness signature. Review of the fund statements revealed Resident #55 in 01/2025 had an income of $923 from social security and a care cost withdrawal of $938 for an overall income of negative (-) $15. In 02/2025, Resident #55 had an income of $946 from social security and a care cost withdrawal of $938 for an overall income of $8. In 03/2025, Resident #55 had an income of $946 twice from social security with no care cost…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure the personalized air conditioner (PTAC) in Resident #55's room was maintained in a clean manner and the facility also failed to maintain plumbing in Resident #48's bathroom to prevent leaking. This affected two residents (#48 and #55) of 30 residents in the sample. The facility census was 64. Findings include 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 07/30/24. Diagnoses included epilepsy, anxiety, dementia, diabetes, psychotic disorder and heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #55 was cognitively impaired with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 05. Interview and observation on 06/16/25 at 10:33 A.M. with Resident #55 confirmed PTAC machine was visibly dirty and had a thick layer of dust on the vent. Resident turned on the PTAC air conditioner and a foul (trash like) smell came…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedures, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication and antianxiety medication were not ordered for longer than 14 days without a stop date or reassessment for appropriateness. This affected one resident (#21) of five reviewed for unnecessary medication. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 05/24/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's dysphasia, muscle wasting, diabetes, and malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 09 out of 15. Review of Resident #21's physician order dated 04/02/25 to 06/24/25 revealed an order for Haloperidol (antipsychotic medication) injection solution 5 milligrams per milliliter (mg/ml) with instructions to give 10 mg once every 24 hours as needed (PRN) for severe agitation.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed accurately for two Residents (#21 and #25) of 30 residents reviewed in the sample. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 05/24/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's dysphagia, muscle wasting, diabetes and malnutrition. a. Review of the incident accident log dated 12/01/25 to 06/16/25 revealed Resident #21 had falls on 12/15/24, 02/28/25, 03/05/25, 03/06/25, 03/13/25, and 03/17/25. Review of Resident #21's progress note dated 02/28/25 revealed the resident had a fall by her room door when trying to leave during a fire drill. The resident's wrist was visibly swollen and an X-ray was ordered. Review of the fall investigation dated 02/28/25 revealed Resident #21 had a fall with injury and a swollen wrist. The X-ray returned with no findings of a fracture. Review of the progress notes dated 03/05/25 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) was updated after a change in the mental health diagnosis for one resident. This affected one resident (#21) out of four reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 64. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 05/24/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's dysphasia, muscle wasting, diabetes and malnutrition. A diagnosis of unspecified psychosis was added to the medical record on 07/02/22 and schizophrenia was added to the medical record as a diagnosis on 07/19/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 09 out of 15. Review of Resident #21's most recent PASARR dated 10/24/23 revealed panic/anxiety disorder and another mental disorder were documented (delusional disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder). There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed as appropriate. This affected one resident (#21) of 22 residents reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 05/24/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, dysphagia, muscle wasting, diabetes, and malnutrition. Review of the social services documentation revealed Resident #21 was approved for Medicaid on 07/17/24. Review of Resident #21's dental consent dated 07/31/24 revealed the resident signed a consent to receive dental services. Review of the dental visit notes dated 04/16/25 revealed Resident #21 had multiple teeth that needed removed. It listed 19 teeth affected for removal. It stated the resident had broken teeth and that the resident reported pain in her mouth. The note further stated Medicaid resident-resources were sent to the facility and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure a resident received showers/bed baths as scheduled. This affected one (Resident #24) out of two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #24 revealed an admission date of 09/26/23 and diagnoses including cerebral palsy (unspecified), generalized muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, and major depressive disorder (recurrent, mild). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment for Resident #24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. Additionally, the resident required maximum assistance with bathing. Review of the care plan for Resident #24 revealed a self-care deficit related to factors including chronic fatigue, generalized weakness, impaired mobility, poor balance, poor coordination, and shortness of breath, which necessitated staff assistance with personal hygiene, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, family interviews, review of hospital records, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident, who was identified at risk of nutritional problems and malnutrition, maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, and failed to follow nutritional interventions, complete weekly weights as ordered, provide appropriate assistance with meals, and provide appropriate oversight and monitoring to address significant and severe weight loss for Resident #10. This affected one (#10) of five residents (#10, #21, #26, #34, and #35) reviewed for nutrition. The facility identified a total of eight residents (#10, #11, #21, #27, #33, #35, #46 and #58) as being at nutritional risk. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 03/01/24. Diagnoses included respiratory failure, dysphagia, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, muscle weakness, metabolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide oxygen to one resident (#58) out of two reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 64. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admission date 04/28/25. Diagnoses included chronic systolic heart failure, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #58 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 that indicated he was cognitively intact. Resident #58 was dependent on turning, personal hygiene, toileting, dressing upper and lower body. Review of the plan of care dated 06/10/25 revealed that Resident #58 had impaired respiratory status related to anxiety, congestive heart failure, history of smoking, obesity, pulmonary edema, and respiratory failure. Interventions included activity level as tolerated, administer medication as ordered, monitor for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy reviews were followed up on in a timely manner and documentation of the pharmacy recommendations were maintained for one resident (#21) out of five reviewed for pharmacy recommendations. The facility census was 64. Findings include Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed an admission date of 05/24/23. Diagnoses included Parkinson's dysphagia, muscle wasting, diabetes and malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #21 had cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 09. a. Review of monthly pharmacy reviews dated 08/2024 revealed Resident #21 had pharmacy recommendations, but it did not state what the recommendation was. Review of monthly pharmacy reviews dated 09/2024 revealed Resident #21 had pharmacy recommendations, but it did not state what the recommendation was. Review of monthly pharmacy reviews dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than five percent (%). Two errors were observed out of twenty-six opportunities, equaling an error rate of 7.69%. This affected two residents (#59 and #217) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 64. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 10/05/23. Diagnoses included type two diabetes and developmental disorder of scholastic skills. Review of the physicians order dated 12/09/24 revealed that Resident #59 had an order for Calcium Carbonate 500 milligrams (mg) with instructions to take one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed for indigestion. Review of the physician order dated 01/07/25 revealed that Resident #59 had an order for Calcium Carbonate 500 mg with instructions to take two at bedtime for indigestion. Review of the plan of care dated 04/03/25 revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to appropriately and safely store medications and biologicals. This affected two residents (#2 and #217) out of 30 residents in the survey sample. The facility census was 64. Findings Include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #217 revealed an admission date 05/08/25. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type two diabetes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and major depressive disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #217 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 that indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #217's physician orders revealed the resident did not have an order for Calcium Carbonate (TUMS) or an order to have medications unattended at bedside. Observation on 06/16/25 at 10:15 A.M. revealed Resident #217 had a medication cup that contained three round tablets, resembling TUMS, in the med cup…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dental services were arranged in a timely manner. This affected three residents (#10, #21, and #50) of four residents reviewed for dental services. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record of Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 08/04/22. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, depression, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, malingerer, and antisocial personality disorder. Review of Resident #50's plan of care dated 03/11/25 revealed the resident had the potential for pain due to dental pain. Interventions included to refer to ancillary services as needed. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had intact cognition. The resident was assessed as having no dental issues. Review of a progress note dated 05/19/25, authored by Nurse Practitioner (NP) #400,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to place Resident #26 on the appropriate diet. This affected one resident (#26) out of 30 residents reviewed for the sample. The facility had a census of 64. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #26 revealed an original admission date of 01/30/25 and the most recent re-entry on 05/28/25. Diagnoses included acute osteomyelitis of the left tibia and fibula, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli infection, metabolic encephalopathy, and acute kidney failure with tubular necrosis. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Additionally, Section K of the MDS stated Resident #26 had no swallowing disorders, was on a therapeutic diet, but it did not state that the resident was receiving a mechanically altered diet. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an effective antibiotic stewardship program was being followed/implemented regarding McGeers criteria for one resident (#10) out of four residents reviewed for infections. The facility census was 64. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #10 revealed an admission date of 03/01/24 with diagnoses including urinary tract infection site not specified, acute pyelonephritis, chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, and carcinoma in situ of unspecified bronchus and lung. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, indicating severely impaired cognition. Review of the nurses' notes revealed Resident #10 exhibited signs and symptoms consistent with a urinary tract infection on two occasions during June 2025. On 05/29/25 at 09:35 A.M., the resident was documented as having increased confusion and urinary discomfort. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-09 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure education was provided prior to offering the coronavirus (COVID) vaccine for two residents (#26 and #162) out of five residents reviewed for vaccines. The facility had a census of 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #162 revealed an admission date of 11/14/24. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type one diabetes mellitus without complications, atherosclerotic heart disease, and generalized muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #162 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13. Review of the immunization records revealed Resident #162 received the COVID vaccine (Comirnaty) intramuscular suspension prefilled syringe, 30 micrograms (mcg)/0.3 milliliter (mL) messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA) vaccine, administered one time on 06/24/25 for COVID…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriately sized incontinence briefs for residents who have bariatric needs. This affected three (Residents #48, #66, and #77) of three bariatric residents reviewed. The facility census was 78. Findings include: 1. Record review for Resident #48 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, atrial fibrillation, incontinence, urinary tract infections, anxiety, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had minimally impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 13. This resident was assessed to be frequently incontinent of both bowel and bladder. Interviews with Registered Nurse (RN) #30 and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #60 on 08/07/24 at 9:15 A.M. revealed the facility is always out of 3XL incontinence briefs for Resident #48. Both stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed monthly due to inadequate supply. This affected one resident (#41) of the four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 78. Findings include: Record review for Resident #41 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, sleep apnea, mood disorder, and congestive heart failure. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had minimally impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 11. This resident was assessed to have received oxygen continuously while residing in the facility. Review of the care plan dated 05/06/24 revealed this resident received oxygen therapy. Interventions included to change the humidifier bottle and tubing every month and as needed per facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, review of the Resident Council food food committee minutes, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the food was served at the appropriate and safe temperatures to the residents. This had the potential to affect all residents except for one resident (#44) who received all his nutrition via a tube feeding. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Interview with Resident #2 on 12/22/23 at 9:18 A.M. revealed the food was served cold nine out of 10 meals. Observations of the lunch meal service on 12/22/23 starting at 11:25 A.M. revealed the meal service was in progress and meals for the 100 hall were already served from the kitchen. Using the surveyor's calibrated thermometer, the steam table hot holding food temperature for the puree cheese rice was 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and macaroni and cheese was 128 degrees F. [NAME] #75 verified the food temperatures and heated the pans of pureed cheese rice and macaroni and cheese in the oven. [NAME] #75 revealed she did not check or record any food temperatures prior to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan for one (Resident #262) out of the two residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #262 revealed an admission date of 09/30/22. Diagnoses included nondisplaced fracture of right femur, urinary tract infection, encephalopathy, wedge compression fracture of unspecified lumbar vertebra, diabetes mellitus, chronic atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease. Review of the Nurse Designee Functional assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #262 required substantial/maximal staff assistance for eating, oral hygiene, and toilet hygiene. Resident #262 did not walk or transfer at the time of the assessment. Further review of the medical record revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status dated 10/03/22 which revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Further review of the medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to update care plans to ensure plans met the resident's current level of needs. This affected two (Residents #50 and #33) of three reviewed for care planning. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #50 revealed an admission date of 07/10/22. Diagnoses included paraplegia, pain in thoracic spine, muscle wasting and atrophy, muscle spasm, and limitation of activities due to disability. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 had intact cognition. Resident #50 required extensive assistance of two plus persons for bed mobility, transfers, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Review of Resident #50's care plan dated 07/20/22 revealed no goals or interventions in place for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Interview on 10/05/22 at 11:16 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #140 verified Resident #50's care plan did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, dialysis contract review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to conduct ongoing assessment of a resident related complications prior to and/or post dialysis. The facility also failed to communicate the resident's vital signs and medical status with the dialysis center. This affected the one (Resident #263) resident who received dialysis. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #263 revealed an admission date of 09/27/22. The medical record for Resident #263 revealed medical diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes mellitus (DM), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of the admission Observation dated 09/28/22 revealed Resident #263 was alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. The assessment revealed Resident #263 required supervision or assistance with mobility, transfers, and ambulation. Review of Resident #263's current physician orders revealed the resident had an order for hemodialysis at an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-12 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete laboratory (lab) orders as directed. This affected one (Resident #22) of three residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 11/10/20. Diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), muscle wasting and atrophy, type II diabetes, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #22 had intact cognition. The resident required supervision for bed mobility, transfers, walk in room, walk in corridor, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The resident received antianxiety, antidepressant, and opioid medications. Review of physician orders dated 07/23/22, start date 07/25/22, revealed a one time order for the following labs: basic metabolic panel (BMP), complete blood count (CBC) with differential, Hemoglobin A1C, and thyroid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to properly practice proper infection control procedures when providing wound care. This affected one (Resident #46) out of four residents reviewed for infection control procedures during wound care. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, muscle wasting and atrophy, atrial fibrillation, type II diabetes, urinary tract infection, and chronic respiratory failure. Review of the Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively intact. Resident #46 required assistance from staff for all activities of daily living and was totally dependent upon staff for maintaining personal hygiene. Resident #46 a stage IV pressure ulcer on her left heel. Review of the care plan dated 08/19/22 revealed Resident #46 was at risk for impaired skin related to advanced disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to properly store and date food items to prevent contamination and spoilage. This had the potential to affect 59 of 62 residents as the facility identified there residents (Resident #39, #155, and #207) who did not eat by mouth . The census was 62. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 10/28/19 at 8:48 A.M. revealed a loaf of sliced white bread in a plastic crate open to air and stored in the dry food storage room in the corner where all the bread and buns were stored. Interview with Dietary Manager #203 on 10/28/19 8:53 A.M. verified the loaf of bread was open to air and should be closed when stored. Observation of the kitchen on 10/28/19 at 9:00 A.M. revealed a package of hot dog buns dated 10/17/19 stored with the bread products and a package of elbow macaroni noodles that were opened and undated. Interview with Dietary Aid # 264 on 10/28/19 at 9:05 A.M. confirmed that the package of hot dog buns were dated for 10/17/19 and that facility was supposed to use the bread prior to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-31 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel record review, staffing schedule review, phone email review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy when background checks were not conducted prior to employment and the facility allowed an employee to continue to work when the background check was not received within 30 days. This affected one State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #210 of nine personnel records reviewed for background checks. STNA #210 was permitted to work two shifts on Hallway #3, after the 30 days had elapsed. The facility identified Hallway #3 had 14 residents (#4, #6, #10, #12, #14, #23, #37, #39, #44, #46, #47, #48, #54 and #207) who resided there. The census was 62. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for STNA #210 revealed she was hired on 09/18/19. The file lacked a background check. Review of staffing schedule dated 10/26/19 and 10/30/19 revealed STNA #210 worked Hallway #3 from 6:00 P.M. to 6:30 A.M. Review of the administrator's phone email on 10/31/19 at 3:00 P.M. revealed he had submitted the background check for STNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview, and facilities policy review the facility failed to provide dignity to residents with catheters. This affected two (Resident #18 and Resident #25) out of six residents with catheters. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 08/08/12 with diagnoses including heart failure, aphasia, urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus, dementia, paraplegia, and urinary retention. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed cognitive status was not assessed and he had presence of a catheter. Review of physician note dated 10/19/19 revealed Resident #18 had poor cognition. Review of physician orders dated October 2019 revealed Resident #18 had a suprapubic catheter. Review of careplans revealed Resident #18 had diagnosis of obstructive uropathy that required use of an indwelling catheter. Goal was for Resident #18's dignity to be maintained without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident funds, staff and resident interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure personal funds money could be obtained on the weekends. This affected one (Resident #11) of four residents reviewed for personal funds. The facility identified 36 residents with personal funds. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of resident funds for Resident #11 revealed she had not made any withdrawals on the weekends from 08/01/19 through 09/30/19. Interview with Resident #11 on 10/28/19 at 10:33 A.M. revealed she didn't think she could take money out on the weekends from her personal account. Interview with Business Office Manager (BOM) #225 on 10/31/19 at 2:12 P.M. revealed there was a petty cash box left on the weekends at the charge nurse's station that only had $40.00 in it and stated that was all that was allowed on the weekends. She stated typically the residents get what they want before the weekend. Interview with Registered Nurse #241 on 10/31/19 at 2:28 P.M. who worked on the unit revealed she worked weekends and said there was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to notify a resident and/or the residents representative in writing the reason for the transfer to the hospital. This affected one (Resident #52) of two residents reviewed for transfer and discharge. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #52's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/07/17 with pertinent diagnosis of: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, adult failure to thrive, atrial fibrillation, osteoarthritis, congestive heart failure, generalized anxiety disorder, chronic kidney disease, and major depressive disorder. Review of the 09/30/19 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing and persona hygiene. Resident #52 was always continent of bowel and bladder and used a wheelchair to aid in mobility. Review of a late entry progress note dated 10/15/19 revealed the resident was having…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a resident with a newly evident mental disorder was referred for a pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) upon a significant change. This affected one (Resident #47) of one resident reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Record review of Resident #47 revealed an admission date of 11/30/17 with pertinent diagnoses of: Parkinson disease, left femur fracture, adult failure to thrive, muscle weakness, basal cell carcinoma of skin of scalp, anxiety disorder, psychosis, bipolar disorder, depressive episodes, osteoarthritis, pain, cognitive communication deficit, vitamin deficiency, vitamin b12 deficiency, hypertensive heart disease, chronic hepatitis, idiopathic hypotension, and nicotine dependence. Review of a 07/26/19 significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was rarely or never understood and requires extensive assistance for bed mobility, dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The resident used a wheelchair to aid in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address the behavioral and refusal of care needs. This affected one (Resident #155) of one resident reviewed for the behavioral/emotional care area. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of Resident #155's record revealed an admission date of 08/22/19 with diagnoses including major depressive disorder recurrent with severe psychotic symptoms,, primary insomnia, other speech and language deficits following cerebral infarction (stroke), type two diabetes mellitus, and other encephalopathy (a brain disease that alters brain function or structure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #155 had severely impaired decision making skills and short/long term memory problems. The MDS further revealed Resident #155 needed the extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene and was totally dependent on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to update and revise resident care plans. This affected one (Resident #18) out of 20 residents reviewed for accurate care plans. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed an admission date of 08/08/12 with diagnoses of heart failure, aphasia, urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus, dementia, paraplegia, and urinary retention. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed cognitive status was not assessed and Resident #18 had range of motion impairments to upper and lower bilateral extremities. Review of physical therapy discharge note dated 08/23/19 revealed Resident #18 was educated on the importance of continuing to wear hip abductor brace in order to decrease contractures and improve neutral position. Staff to get him up out of bed daily and apply the abductor brace daily. Physical therapy discharge instructions included 24 hour care and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and interview the facility failed to provide appropriate care for residents with catheters. This affected one (Resident #25) out of six residents with catheters. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 07/20/12 with diagnoses of paraplegia, bladder disorder, depression, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #25 had some moderate cognitive deficits and presence of a catheter. Review of physician orders dated October 2019 revealed supra pubic catheter to straight drain and privacy bag at all times. Review of careplan revealed Resident #25 had suprapubic catheter and intervention included to keep drainage bag below the level of the bladder. Observation was conducted on 10/28/19 at 5:08 P.M. of Resident #25 resting in bed and catheter drainage bag was placed up by Resident #25's head on the bed frame…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to notify the physician of a significant weight loss for Resident #50 and failed to implement fluid restrictions for Resident #31. This affected two (Resident's #31 and #50) of two residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1- Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 05/21/19 and a readmission date of 09/26/19 with diagnoses including anemia, muscle weakness, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, mild intellectual disabilities and anorexia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly review dated 10/17/19 revealed Resident #50 was moderately cognitively impaired and required the extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and transfers. The resident required extensive assistance of one person for dressing and toileting, and supervision and set up care for eating. Resident #50 had a weight loss of five percent (%) or more in one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) was completed correctly and timely, behaviors were monitored for an antipsychotic medication, and recommendation from the pharmacy was completed. This affected one (Resident #1) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. In addition, the facility failed to ensure resident's blood sugars were reported to the physician and pharmacy recommendations were completed. This affected one (Resident #42) of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 62. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 06/17/09. Medical diagnoses included hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, depression, anxiety, manic depressive, and schizophrenic. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was cognitively intact. Her functional status was supervision for bed mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure infection prevention procedures were followed. The facility failed to properly clean Resident #205's perineal area during indwelling Foley catheter care. This affected one (Resident #205) of two residents reviewed for catheter care. The facility census was 62. Findings include: Record review of Resident #205 revealed an admission date of 10/22/19 with diagnoses of: fracture of unspecified parts of unbearable spine and pelvis, fracture of upper end of right humerus, orthostatic hypotension, anemia, cerebral infarction, polyneuropathy, and retention of urine. Review of a physician order dated 10/23/19 revealed change Foley catheter as needed. Observation of indwelling Foley catheter care for resident #205 on 10/30/19 at 3:22 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #252 got her materials ready including soap, water, wash cloths, and a wash basin. LPN #252 preceded to clean the Foley catheter tubing with soap and water and then rinsed the catheter tubing. LPN #252…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-07-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the employee files, staff interview, and review of the facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to complete employee reference checks prior to hire and failed to ensure documented evidence of written policies and procedures pertaining to screening potential new employees with employee reference checks prior to hire. This had the potential to affect all facility residents. The facility census was 64. Findings include: 1. Review of the employee file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #120 revealed she began employment on 04/09/24. The employee file had no evidence of reference checks being completed prior to hire. 2. Review of the employee file for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #124 revealed she began employment on on 05/31/25. The employee file had no evidence of reference checks being completed prior to hire. 3. Review of the employee file for Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #78 revealed she began employment on 06/08/25. The employee file had no evidence of reference checks being completed prior to hire. 4. Review of the employee file for Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$774K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 2%Other / private 16%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $774K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$271per resident / day
operating cost
$8,231per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$263per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365679. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next