Fulton Manor Nursing & Rehab C

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 142 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 65.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.23 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.42 to 0.76 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to notify the physician of weight deviations in accordance with physician orders. This affected one (#62) of two residents reviewed for weight. The facility census was 65.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included renal failure, type II diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure with stage five chronic kidney disease, disorder of the kidney and ureter, and peripheral vascular angioplasty with implants and grafts.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/31/26, revealed Resident #2 was assessed with no cognitive impairment and received dialysis treatments. Review of the care plan dated 02/27/26 revealed Resident #2 was to be weighed at the same time of day and recorded as ordered. Review of the clinical record revealed a physician order, dated 03/03/26, to weigh Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the medical record, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to adequately monitor bowel movements and implement bowel protocol as needed. This affected one (#6) of one residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. The facility census was 65.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included spinal stenosis, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, chronic kidney disease stage III, hyperlipidemia, hypothyroidism, fibromyalgia, and dysphagia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/25/26, revealed Resident #6 was moderately cognitively impaired and required partial/moderate assistance with toileting. The resident was occasionally incontinent of bladder and always continent of bowel.Review of the most recent care plan verified Resident #6 had a focus areas for constipation due to decreased mobility, diminished appetite, and use/side effects of medication. Interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain resident weights as ordered to determine gains and losses for weight monitoring. This affected one (#62) of two residents reviewed for weight. The facility census was 65.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and hypertension.Review of the MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #62 revealed no the resident was assessed as cognitively intact. Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed a physician order dated 10/28/24 directing staff to monitor, record, and report to the physician significant weight loss of three (3) pounds (lbs.) in one week, greater than 5 percent (%) in one month, greater than 7.5% in 3 months, or greater than 10% in six (6) months.Review of Resident #62's medical record revealed a physician order dated 10/15/25 for staff to weigh the resident weekly and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure supplemental oxygen tubing was properly labeled and dated. This affected one (#40) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 65.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 03/04/14 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and congestive heart failure (CHF). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 03/24/26, revealed Resident #40's cognition was moderately impaired. Review of physician orders for Resident #40 revealed an order dated 01/07/26 for oxygen administration via nasal cannula at three liters per minute and an order to change and date the oxygen tubing weekly on Monday during night shift for infection prevention.Observation on 04/13/26 at 2:05 P.M. revealed Resident #40 was seated in her wheelchair with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to establish adequate monitoring of medication side effects for anticoagulant and antianxiety medications. This affected one (#3) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 65. Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included autistic disorder, Asperger's syndrome, chronic kidney disease stage four, heart failure, and diabetes mellitus type two.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 02/07/26, revealed Resident #3 was cognitively intact. Review of the most recent care plan revealed Resident #3 was care planned for use of antianxiety medications and interventions included to monitor, document, and report any adverse reactions to antianxiety therapy. Review of the physician order, dated 02/15/23, revealed Resident #3 was prescribed Xarelto (an anticoagulant) 20 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time a day for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to timely notify the physician and resident representative of a change in condition. This affected one (#16) of three resident's reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 64.Findings include:Record review for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 02/19/24. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease and dementia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/21/25, revealed Resident #16 had intact cognition as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. Review of a physician order dated 06/27/25 revealed Resident #16 was ordered ropinrole HCI (used to treat Parkinson's symptoms) oral tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg) three times daily. Review of the June 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed on 06/27/25, the order for ropinrole 0.5 mg three times daily was entered as 5 mg four times daily. Further review of the MAR revealed Resident #16 was administered ropinrole 5 mg on 06/27/25 at 4:00 P.M. and 9:00 P.M.; 06/28/25 at 6:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of staff witness statements, review of facility submitted Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the state survey agency (SSA). This affected one (#57) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 64.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #57 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, moderate with agitation; major depressive disorder, recurrent; Alzheimer's disease; and Type II diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/23/25, revealed the resident was moderately cognitive impaired. The resident had physical, verbal, rejection of care, wandering, and other behaviors and was (staff) dependent for toileting, lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan, dated 09/17/25, revealed Resident #57 had a behavior problem due to accusing others,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of witness statements, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse. This affected one (#57) of three residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 64.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #57 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included unspecified dementia, moderate with agitation; major depressive disorder, recurrent; Alzheimer's disease; and Type II diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/23/25, revealed the resident was moderately cognitive impaired. The resident had physical, verbal, rejection of care, wandering, and other behaviors and was (staff) dependent for toileting, lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of the care plan, dated 09/17/25, revealed Resident #57 had a behavior problem due to accusing others, expressing frustration/anger at others, screaming at others, threatening others, disruptive sounds,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (#16) of three residents reviewed for medication errors. The facility census was 64.Findings include:Record review for Resident #16 revealed an admission date of 02/19/24. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease and dementia.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/21/25, revealed Resident #16 had intact cognition as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14. Review of a physician order dated 06/27/25 revealed Resident #16 was ordered ropinrole HCI (used to treat Parkinson's symptoms) oral tablet 0.5 milligrams (mg) three times daily.Review of a nursing nursing note dated 06/27/25 revealed an order was received for ropinrole HCI oral table 0.5 milligrams (mg) three times a day.Review of the June 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed on 06/27/25, the order for ropinrole 0.5 mg three times daily was entered into the electronic medical record (EMR) as five mg four times daily.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure urinary intermittent straight catheterization was provided in accordance with physician orders. This affected one (#01) of three sampled residents reviewed for urinary catheterization. Facility census 52. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #01, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis including, non-pressure chronic ulcer to back, paraplegia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, osteomyelitis, pressure ulcer of sacral region, varicose veins with ulcer to lower extremity, and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment 3.0 dated 08/27/23 for Resident #01, revealed the resident was assessed with intact cognition, able to make needs known, dependent on staff for activities of daily living, utilized an ostomy and required intermittent catheterization. Review of the physician orders dated 08/14/23 for Resident #01, revealed the resident was ordered to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in OH