Jenkins Care Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 44.1 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2019-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the medical record, facility investigation, staff statements, facility Fall Risk Assessment/Reassessment and Prevention policy and staff interview the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #20) was provided assistance with bed mobility by two staff members, as assessed, during incontinence care. Actual Harm occurred when one staff member provided incontinence care to Resident #20 resulting in the resident falling from the bed and sustaining an acute impacted left femoral intertrochanteric fracture (occur when a force presses against both ends of the femur at the femoral neck, pushing the broken ends of the bone together) and unspecified fracture of the lower end of the right femur requiring surgical repair. In addition the facility failed to comprehensively investigate falls to determine trends and implement individualized interventions to prevent falls for Resident #31. This affected two residents (#20 and #31) of four residents reviewed for falls. Findings Include: 1.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure timely services were provided for a head injury as ordered by the physician, notification to the family of the incident, and ensure fall interventions in place. This affected one (Resident #22) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 44. Findings include:Record review revealed Resident #22 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's disease, dementia, and fatigue. Review of a care plan dated 11/18/24 revealed Resident #22 was at risk for falls related to deconditioning. The goal was to have less incidents of falls with injuries through the review date. Interventions included but were not limited to anticipate and meet resident's needs, call light in reach, dycem to wheelchair seat, non-skid strips to the floor on the left side of bed, visual cues to remind resident to use call lights, and a safe environment. Review of a physician order from Physician #101 dated 04/10/25 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement pressure ulcer prevention precautions for Resident #206 identified as having a facility acquired deep tissue injury (DTI) (Purple or maroon area of discolored intact skin due to damage of underlying soft tissue. The area may be preceded by tissue that is painful, firm, mushy, boggy, warmer or cooler as compared to adjacent tissue). This affected one ( Resident #206) of three residents reviewed for skin impairment. The facility census was 43.Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #206 revealed an admission date of 02/27/25 and was discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #206 diagnoses included aftercare following joint replacement surgery, dysphagia, non-rheumatic aortic valve stenosis, left bundle branch block, hypertension, urinary retention and recent gastrointestinal hemorrhage.Review of the Braden scale assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #206 was at a high risk for pressure ulcers with a score of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record affecting Resident #206. This affected one (Resident #206) of nine resident medical record reviews. The facility census was 43.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #206 revealed an admission date of 02/27/25 and was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #206 diagnoses included aftercare following joint replacement surgery, dysphagia, non-rheumatic aortic valve stenosis, left bundle branch block, hypertension, urinary retention and recent gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Review of the admission five day Medicare Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #206 was cognitively intact with feelings of depression noted and no behaviors. Resident #206 had impaired range of motion to one side of lower extremities and used a wheelchair for mobility. Resident #206 required a set up for meals and substantial to maximum assistance from staff with toileting hygiene,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an appropriate transfer notice with Ombudsman notifications to either the resident or designated representative. This affected one resident (Resident #5) out of three residents reviewed for facility discharge. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Closed Record Review of Resident #5 on 02/04/25 at 11:21 A.M. revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses: chronic kidney disease, GERD, chronic pain, altered mental status, osteoarthritis, fatigue, irritable bowel syndrome, neuralgia and neuritis, gout, hyperglycemia, depression, anxiety, arthritis, shortness of breath, difficult ambulation, and aspirin use. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 11/26/24 revealed Resident #5 was alert and oriented to name only and had severe cognitive impairment. Review of facility transfer and discharge information revealed no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a significant change Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for Resident #7 and failed to ensure the admission PASARR was completed accurately for Resident #31. This affected two (Resident #7 and Resident #31) of four residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 40. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 11/20/23 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia with psychotic disturbance, diabetes mellitus type two, peripheral vascular disease, visual hallucinations, auditory hallucinations, depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Review of the physician order dated 11/20/23 revealed Resident #31 was ordered Celexa (antidepressant/antianxiety medication) 20 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time daily for anxiety. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had intact cognition with no mood or behaviors. Resident #31 had diagnosis of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to invite Resident #31 to attend quarterly care conferences. This affected one resident of 12 reviewed for care planning and care conference. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 11/20/23 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia with psychotic disturbance, diabetes mellitus type two, peripheral vascular disease, visual hallucinations, auditory hallucinations, depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Review of the physician orders dated 02/25 revealed several changes in medication since Resident #31 was admitted . Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had intact cognition with no mood or behaviors. Resident #31 required partial to moderate assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living. Resident #31 had diagnosis of dementia, depression and bipolar disorder. Resident #31 received antidepressant medication. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an ordered psychiatric consult following a gradual dose reduction (GDR) recommendation. This affected one (Resident #35) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Record review of Resident #35 on 02/04/25 at 2:06 P.M. revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses: Parkinson's disease, altered mental status, physical debility, hallucinations, osteoporosis, anxiety, depression, hyperlipidemia, GERD, constipation, dysphagia, edema, depression, and glossodynia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completed on 01/22/25 revealed resident was alert and oriented to name only and had minimal cognitive impairment Review of physician orders revealed this resident is receiving the following medications: Venlafaxine 150 milligrams (mg) 1 tablet by mouth twice daily for anxiety; Clozapine 100 mg 1 tablet by mouth daily at bedtime…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent the worsening of contracture's were implemented. This affected one resident (#7) out of the two residents reviewed for limited range of motion during the annual survey. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Record review for Resident #7 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Parkinsonism, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/21/24, revealed the resident was assessed to have mildly impaired cognition and limited range of motion to bilateral upper extremities. Review of the Occupational Therapy Discharge Progress Note, signed 08/13/24, revealed recommendations skilled Occupational Therapy (OT) services indicated to promote skin integrity and Passive Range of Motion to left hand for application of therapy carrot daily for left hand stiffness. Review of the care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was appropriately assessed to identify causes and triggers for trauma. This affected one resident (#7) reviewed for PTSD during the annual survey. The facility identified one resident having a diagnosis of PTSD. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Record review for Resident #7 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included Parkinsonism, PTSD, and anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/21/24, revealed the resident was assessed to have mildly impaired cognition. Review of the care plans for Resident #7 revealed there was not a plan of care in place addressing the residents PTSD or trauma. Further record review for Resident #7 revealed there was not an assessment of the cause of the residents PTSD or potential triggers for PTSD. Interview with Social Services employee #105 on 02/05/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure parameters for the monitoring and reporting of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) were in place. This affected one resident (#31) out of the five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications during the annual survey. The facility census was 40. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 11/20/23 with diagnoses including unspecified dementia with psychotic disturbance, diabetes mellitus type two, peripheral vascular disease, visual hallucinations, auditory hallucinations, depressive disorder and bipolar disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31 had intact cognition with no mood or behaviors. Resident #31 required partial to moderate assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living. Resident #31 had diagnosis of dementia, depression and bipolar disorder. Resident #31 received antidepressant medication and insulin. Review of the physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH