Lutheran Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 121 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 39.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.37 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.17 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.48 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-11-24 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of facility policy, review of facility education in-service, review of a disciplinary action form, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care and services for a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line site were completed as ordered. This affected one resident (#70) of three residents reviewed for intravenous (IV) access. The facility census was 66.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #70 revealed an admission date of 08/21/25 and discharge date of 09/13/25. Diagnoses included Evan's syndrome (an autoimmune disorder where the immune system destroys its own blood cells), systemic lupus erythematosus, hereditary hemolytic anemia, long term use of antibiotics, and drug or chemical induced diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia.Review of the admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #70 admitted to the facility from the hospital for urinary tract infection (UTI) and was being treated with antibiotics (ATB). It was noted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #64 was free from physical restraints. This affected one resident (#64) of one resident reviewed for restraints. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #64 revealed an admission date of 05/07/22. Diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, dementia, and type two diabetes. Review of the annual, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #64 had a short-and long-term memory problem, was severely impaired for tasks of daily life, and required two-person total dependence for activities of daily living (ADL). Further review of the MDS assessment, section P, revealed physical restraints were any manual method or physical or mechanical device, material or equipment attached or adjacent to the resident's body that the individual cannot remove easily which restricts freedom of movement or normal access to one's body. Review of section P revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interview, review of the fall investigations, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were in place to prevent falls for Resident #78 and failed to ensure falls were thoroughly investigated. This affected one resident (#78) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #78 revealed an admission date of 08/22/22. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's, muscle weakness, repeated falls, anxiety, pain, and insomnia. Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #78 was at high risk for falls. Review of the fall risk plan of care dated 02/20/23 revealed Resident #78 was at risk for falls due to limited mobility, muscle weakness, and a history of a right hip fracture. Interventions included anti-rollbacks to her wheelchair, Dycem (non-skid material) under her wheelchair seat cushion, non-skid footwear when out of bed, a night light in her room,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a prescribed antibiotic was not given for more than 14 days without a rationale. This affected one resident (#15) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 12/11/20. Diagnoses included dry eye syndrome, anxiety, paraplegia, and corneal ulcer to the right eye. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was cognitively intact. She required extensive assistance of one person for transfers, bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and hygiene. Review of the physician's orders for August 2023 revealed an order for Refresh Plus Solution one drop in both eyes four times a day (QID), Restasis 0.05 % one drop in both eyes one time a day (QD) and Moxifloxacin HCl ophthalmic drop (used to treat infections of the membrane that covers the outside of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were utilized, failed to ensure anti-anxiety medications were used for the intended purpose and not used for longer than 14 days without a rationale. This affected three residents (#48, #71, and #94) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 104. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 09/26/22. Diagnoses included Lupus, psychosis, anxiety, fibromyalgia, chronic kidney disease, and arthritis. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #48 was cognitively intact. She was totally dependent on two people for transfers, required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and toilet use and extensive assistance of one person for dressing and hygiene. Review of the physician's orders for August 2023 revealed Resident #48 was ordered Ativan 0.5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop a comprehensive infection control program to decrease the risk of infections and ensure adequate monitoring of infections was completed. The facility failed to maintain consistent use of isolation precautions for Resident #9 and failed to ensure dressing changes were completed to reduce the risk of infection for Resident #40 and #110. This affected three residents (#9, #40 and #110) and had the potential to affect all 126 residents residing in the facility. Finding include: 1. Review of the facility monthly infection control logs and quarterly infection control summaries revealed the total numbers of residents marked as positive for infections for the last four quarters had increased. The number of residents marked as positive for the first quarter (January to March) of 2019 was 20, the second quarter (April to June) number was 35, and the third quarter (July to September) for 2019 was 37. There was no totaled number for the fourth…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2018-11-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain sufficient levels of nursing staff to ensure call lights were answered timely and to meet the total care needs of all residents. This affected 13 residents (Resident #12, #13, #25, #33, #40, #71, #73, #74, #77, #84, #85, #118 and #120) and had the potential to affect all 134 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. During the annual survey, the following residents identified concerns related to staffing: Interview on 11/26/18 at 10:36 A.M. with Resident #71 revealed the resident felt the facility needed more staff because she had incidents in which she had to to sit on the toilet too long. Interview on 11/26/18 at 10:50 A.M. with Resident #74 revealed sometimes she has to wait 40 minutes for her call light to get answered, more on second shift, and she had been left on the bed pan for two hours a couple months ago. Interview on 11/26/18 at 2:40 P.M. with Resident #84 revealed the facility was short on staff in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect involving Resident #186 was reported timely to the State agency as required. This affected one resident (Resident #186) of two residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Findings include: Review of a facility self reported incident, dated 06/03/18 revealed Resident #186 alleged an incident of neglect when a State tested nursing assistant did not answer the resident's call light within a reasonable time period around 3:00 A.M. Review of the investigation revealed the final report of the incident was not submitted to the State agency until 06/12/18. An interview with the Administrator on 11/28/18 at 2:45 P.M. revealed he had completed the investigation of the incident. He stated he was aware of the five day time frame to report the final results of the investigation to the State agency but verified he had not completed and submitted the final disposition of the investigation to the State agency within five business days as required. Review of the facility Abuse policy, revised January 2018…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2018-11-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect, involving Resident #186 was thoroughly investigated. This affected one resident (Resident #186) of two residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #186 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including obstructive sleep apnea, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypoxemia and anxiety. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/01/18 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required the extensive assistance of two staff for her activities of daily living. The resident was discharged from the facility to her home on [DATE]. Review of a facility self reported incident, dated 06/03/18 revealed Resident #186 alleged a State tested nursing assistant did not answer her call light within a reasonable time period around 3:00 A.M. Review of the facility investigation of the incident revealed the investigation did not include an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #45's fall interventions were in place as ordered. This affected one resident (Resident #45) of one resident reviewed for accident hazards. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of upper end of left humerus, psychosis, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, muscle weakness, and history of falling. Resident #45's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 10/01/18 revealed his cognition was severely impaired and he required extensive two person assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Resident #45's physician's order, dated 04/05/18 revealed the resident's bed should be in low position. Resident #45's active comprehensive care plan for being at risk for falls revealed an intervention of bed in lowest positioning. Observation on 11/27/18 at 9:05 A.M. revealed Resident #45 was in his room by himself. The resident was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 48 rows in the source record cover these 38 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH