Alpine Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
164 Office Park Drive, Xenia, OH 45385 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (937) 419-4500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Aug 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $28,130 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-08)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.0% | 5.3% | 15.4% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.8% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 62.8% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.5% | 6.1% | 16.1% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.7% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.3% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.2% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 19.6% | 21.4% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.1% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 60.4% | 75.6% | 79.4% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 6.5–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.20 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 74.6 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.64 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THIS DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENCE OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on record review, review of physician standing orders, review of hospital records, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from constipation and had interventions to prevent constipation on the care plan. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #75 did not have a bowel movement for five days before a stool softener was prescribed and was transferred out to the hospital and diagnosed with a fecal impaction. This affected one (Resident #75) of three residents reviewed for constipation. The census was 73. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #75 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 03/15/25. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, thyroid disorder and osteoporosis. Review of the baseline care plan dated 01/18/25 for Resident #75 revealed she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-04-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of hospital records, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated timely for a urinary tract infections (UTI). This resulted in Actual harm when Resident #75 developed signs and symptoms of a UTI and wasn't treated for the UTI for six days. She transferred out to the hospital and it was discovered the resident had a significant distention in the bladder with renal pelvictasis, (renal pelviectasis, is when urine gathers in the center of the kidney, called the pelvis. This makes the kidney larger than normal. This condition can affect one or both kidneys.) This affected one (Resident #75) of one resident reviewed for UTI. There were no other residents in the facility with a UTI. The census was 73. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #75 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 03/15/25. Diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, coronary artery disease, heart failure, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRIs), and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of resident medications. This affected one (Resident #35) of three residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 72 residents.Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 10/31/22 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, generalized anxiety disorder, and chronic pain syndrome.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #35 dated 07/18/25 revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the controlled substance administration record for Resident #35 revealed 30 hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams (mg) tablets were dispensed on 05/16/25. The administration record indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and dated properly. This had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 69 residents. Findings include: 1.Observation on 05/18/25 at 9:09 A.M. of the walk-in refrigerator revealed it contained four pre-made salads and one pitcher of orange liquid which were not labeled or dated. Interview on 05/18/25 at 9:15 A.M. with Dietary [NAME] (DC) #342 confirmed the salads and the pitcher of orange liquid were unlabeled and undated. DC #342 confirmed foods should be labeled and dated upon opening. 2.Observation on 05/20/25 at 10:47 A.M. of the walk-in refrigerator revealed it contained two trays of cups filled with orange liquid which were unlabeled and undated. Interview on 05/20/25 at 10:47 A.M. with Kitchen Manager (KM) #334 confirmed the trays of cups filled with orange liquid were unlabeled and undated. KM #334 confirmed foods should be labeled and dated upon opening. Review of facility policy titled Food Receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated upon opening and discarded on or before the expiration date. This affected eight (Residents #6, #8, #10, #24, #28, #44, #49, and #122) and had the potential to affect all of the residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 69 residents. Findings include: 1.Review of the medical record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and heart failure. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #28 revealed an order dated [DATE] for artificial tears eye drops to both eyes twice daily. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #28 dated [DATE] revealed the resident had intact cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the physician's orders for Resident #28 revealed orders dated [DATE] for prednisone eye…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to complete significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #7) of 17 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility census was 69 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 11/21/21 with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, cerebral infarction, and vascular dementia. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #7 revealed an order dated 03/04/25 for the resident to be admitted to hospice. Review of the significant change MDS assessment for Resident #7 dated 05/01/25 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for assistance with ADLs. Interview on 05/21/25 at 12:35 P.M. with MDS Coordinator #208 confirmed the facility had not completed the significant change MDS assessment for Resident #7 within 14 days as required. Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Assessments dated March 2022 revealed comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to submit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #59) of 17 residents reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 69 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of 10/03/23 with diagnoses including aphasia, dementia, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the MDS assessment for Resident #59 revealed the MDS for January had a target date of 01/06/25 and a completion date of 01/27/25, and the MDS for April had a target date of 04/07/25 and a completion date of 04/29/25. Interview on 05/21/25 at 01:33 PM with MDS Coordinator #208 confirmed the Resident #59's January 2025 MDS was late and not completed until 01/27/25, and the April 2025 MDS was late and not completed until 04/29/25. MDS Coordinator #208 further confirmed neither of Resident #59's assessments had been transmitted within 14 days as required.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were coded accurately. This affected one (Resident #66) of 17 residents reviewed for MDS assessments. The facility census was 69 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #66 revealed an admission date of 03/13/25 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, and anxiety disorder. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #66 dated 03/16/25 revealed an order for oxygen two liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (NC) as needed to keep oxygen saturation above 92 percent (%). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #66 dated 04/04/25 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required staff supervision and assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of section O for special treatments and procedures for the MDS assessment for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the facility, the facility failed to ensure staff monitored tube feeding residuals. This affected one (Resident #40) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. The facility census was 69 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #40 revealed an admission date of 08/23/24 with diagnoses including dysphagia following cerebral infarction, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #40 dated 04/02/25 revealed the resident had severely impaired cognition and required substantial staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the physician's orders for Resident #40 revealed an order dated 04/30/25 to check tube for residual before each feeding with instructions: if residual is above 60 milliliters (ml) hold for one hour and recheck, and if still above 60 ml to call the doctor. Review of the care plan for Resident #40 revised 05/07/25 revealed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of manufacturer's guidelines, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below five percent (%). There were two errors out of 29 medication opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 6.9%. This affected one (Resident #17) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 69 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 07/08/24 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, generalized anxiety disorder, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #17 dated 04/15/25 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the physician's orders for Resident #17 revealed an order dated 05/02/25 Humalog insulin 22 units subcutaneously before meals and an order dated 05/06/25 for Glargine insulin 54 units subcutaneously in the morning. Observation on 05/20/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of manufacturer's guidelines, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors. This affected one (Resident #17) of seven residents reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 69 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 07/08/24 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, generalized anxiety disorder, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #17 dated 04/15/25 revealed the resident had intact cognition and required staff assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Review of the physician's orders for Resident #17 revealed an order dated 05/02/25 Humalog insulin 22 units subcutaneously before meals and an order dated 05/06/25 for Glargine insulin 54 units subcutaneously in the morning. Observation on 05/20/25 at 7:45 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #245 administered 22 units of Humalog insulin and 54…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff completed proper hand hygiene during medication administration. This affected one (Resident #30) of seven residents observed for medication administration. The facility also failed to ensure staff cleaned glucometers as appropriate after use. This affected one (Resident #3) of one resident with orders for blood sugar checks. Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, review of the facility policy, and review online guidance per the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) the facility also failed to ensure staff disposed of personal protective equipment (PPE) properly. This affected one (Resident #123) of 15 residents with orders for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP.) The facility census was 69 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission date of 10/31/22 with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder, type two diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were free from pests. This affected one (Resident #23) of 17 residents reviewed for the physical environment. The facility census was 69 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 01/17/25 with diagnoses including e muscular dystrophy, depression, and opioid dependence. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #23 dated 04/23/25 revealed the resident #23 had intact cognition and required set up and supervision with activities of daily living (ADLs.) Observation on 05/18/25 at 2:46 P.M. of Resident #23's room revealed there were five ants on bedside table and four ants on windowsill and wall. Observation on 05/20/25 at 9:45 A.M. of Resident #23's room revealed there were 10 ants in total on the bedside table, wall, and windowsill. Interview on 05/20/25 at 9:46 A.M. with Resident #23 confirmed he had ants present in his room for weeks, he had reported it, but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed ensure meals were palatable. This affected three (Residents #31, #59 and #57) of three residents reviewed for food. The facility identified two residents who couldn't eat anything by mouth. The census was 73. Findings include: Review of the menu dated 04/07/25 revealed lunch consisted of a peppered hamburger patty, buttered noodles, green beans, and white cake. A test tray was obtained on 04/07/25 at 11:50 A.M. The meat was crispy around the edges and was tough. The noodles were over cooked and tasted mushy and the green beans were bland. During an interview on 04/07/25 at 11:55 A.M., Dietary Manager (DM) #171 stated if she cooks the noodles el [NAME], the residents complain they are too hard. This is the way the residents like the noodles. Se said to get the beef pepper patties done and up to temperature they had to be cooked this way. She admitted the foods were over cooked. During an interview on 04/07/25 at 12:55…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interviews, and policy / procedures the facility failed to perform incontinence care in a sanitary manner. This affected one (#19) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an admission date of 04/11/28 with diagnoses of cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of unspecified carotid artery, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, and obesity. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #19 required setup assistance with eating, substantial assistance with personal hygiene, and was dependent on staff assistance with oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, bathing, dressing, bed mobility. Review of the care plan dated 06/24/22 revealed Resident #19 had bladder and bowel incontinence, with interventions to assist resident to the bathroom as needed and to provide…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for the residents when a window air-conditioning unit in the dining room had exposed wires and coils. This had the potential to affect 41 residents (#102, #107, #109, #110, #112, #116, #118, #119, #120, #122, #125, #126, #127, #128, #129,#130, #131, #134, #135, #136, #138, #139, #142, #143, #144, #145, #146, #147, #149, #151, #152, #153, #154, #156, #158, #159, #161, #162, #163, #164, and #167) who the facility identified who were cognitively impaired and mobile. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Observations on 05/15/24 at 10:20 A.M. in the dining room, was a window air conditioning unit plugged into electrical outlet. The air conditioning unit had exposed coils, wires, and a thick layer of dust with debris and cobwebs covering the exposed internal components of the unit. On the wall in the dining room was a thermostat with no dial with a typed note Do not change setting on the thermostat, and fan, doing so can cause the system to overheat and could cause a fire. For residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of the facility policy, and resident and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the residents had access to their call light. This affected one (Resident #200) of two residents reviewed for call light accessibility and functioning. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #200 revealed an admission date of 07/25/19. Diagnoses included right hip fracture, seizure disorder, left below the knee amputation, traumatic brain injury, and vascular dementia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #200 had intact cognition. Resident #200 required partial/moderate assistance from staff with oral hygiene and substantial/maximal assistance to dependent on staff for toileting, bathing/shower, upper body dressing, and lower body dressing. Review of the plan of care dated 06/14/22 revealed Resident #200 was at increased for risk for falls with interventions to have commonly used…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete an assessment and implement a treatment for a newly developed pressure ulcer. This affected one (#43) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 65. Findings included: Review of the medical record Resident #43 revealed an admission date of 09/01/16 with medical diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, peripheral vascular disease, and hypertension. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which indicated Resident #43 was cognitively intact and required substantial/maximum staff assistance for bed mobility, bathing, transfers, and toileting. The MDS indicated Resident #43 was always incontinence of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. The MDS indicated Resident #43 did not have any pressure ulcers. Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed a nurse's note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure personal protective equipment was worn in resident areas to prevent the potential spread of infection. In addition, the facility failed to ensure contaminated linens and trash were handled to prevent the potential spread of infection. This had the potential to affect all 63 residents at the facility. 1. Observation and interview on 08/22/22 at 8:52 A.M. State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #563 walked out of Resident #213 room. The STNA was wearing a N95 mask, eye protection, and an isolation gown. She walked down the walkway along the common area with no residents present and turned left out of view. The STNA returned within minutes carrying bath linens. The STNA #563 stated when she was given report at 6:00 A.M. she was told all residents on the corner were in isolation and believed she did not have to remove her gown if she was not entering another resident room or leave the isolated section of rooms. She then stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-29 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, and staff interview, the facility failed to update a resident's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) when a new diagnosis of schizophrenia was added. This affected one resident (#28) out of three residents reviewed for PASARR. The facility census was 63. Review of Resident #28 medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dizziness and giddiness, history of traumatic brain injury, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, type II diabetes, post traumatic stress disorder, depression, phobic anxiety disorder, acquired absence of right leg below knee, hypertension, and epilepsy. On 08/07/19 a new diagnosis of schizophrenia was added to his diagnosis. Review of the quarterly Minimal Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was cognitively intact. His functional status was listed as limited to extensive one person assistance for all activities daily living. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-29 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the Agency on Aging determinations, review of the hospital exemption form, and staff interview, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review. This affected two residents (#19 and #42) out of three residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review. The census was 63. Findings include: 1. Medical Record Review for Resident #42 revealed admission date of admission date of 07/27/12. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, aphasia, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, dementia, post polio syndrome, contracture, unspecified joint, psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, and anxiety disorder. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had impaired cognition. Review of the Agency on Aging dated 11/08/12 revealed Pre-admission Screening (PAS) Determination was not applicable. Level of Care Determination effective date 09/08/12,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility incidents, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a fall investigation was completed and root cause was identified post resident fall. This affected one resident (#15) out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 63. Review of the medical record for Resident #15 revealed an admission date of 11/03/21. Diagnosis included obstructive and reflux uropathy, pseudobulbar affect, personal history of Covid-19, dementia, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated on 06/23/22 revealed Resident #15 had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #15 required total dependence for bed mobility, dressing, bathing, and personal hygiene. Resident was setup assistance for all meals. Resident #15 required extensive one-person assistance for toilet use, and transfers. The resident used a wheelchair for ambulation. Review of the plan of care dated on 07/11/22 revealed Resident #15 was at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure weights were monitored per recommendation. This affected one resident (#42) out of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. The census was 63. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed admission date of 07/27/12. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, aphasia, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, dementia, post polio syndrome, contracture, unspecified joint, psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, and anxiety disorder. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 had impaired cognition. The resident required total assistance of two persons for bed mobility and transfers. The resident had a functional limitation in Range of Motion (ROM) on one side of the upper extremity and impairment on both sides of the lower extremities. The resident required supervision with setup help only for eating.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to comprehensively document care provided for residents. This affected two residents (#54 and #61) of 24 resident record reviews. The census was 63. Findings include: 1. Medical Record Review for Resident #54 revealed admission date of [DATE]. Diagnoses included neoplasm of uncertain behavior of spinal cord, pressure ulcer unspecified site, stage III, pressure ulcer of sacral region, unspecified stage, and severe protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #54 had intact cognition. The resident required extensive one person assistance for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The resident required supervision set up help only for eating. The resident had a pressure ulcer/injury. The resident had one stage three pressure ulcer and two stage four pressure ulcers, one upon admission/entry or reentry.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview and review of medication storage policy, the facility failed to properly label drugs and biological's used in the facility and the facility failed to ensure medication carts were secure. This directly affected two Residents (#70 and #62) of two whose medication were observed opened and undated. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility also failed to ensure medication carts on the memory impaired unit were locked. Facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #70, revealed an admission date of 08/31/12. Diagnoses included acute angle-closure glaucoma, mood disorder, hemiplegia and heart failure. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 08/01/19, revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #70 had no behaviors, did not reject care, and did not wander. Resident was dependent or required extensive assistance for activities of daily living…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy on cleaning glucometers and facility policy the facility failed to maintain an infection program. The facility failed to ensure a glucometer was cleaned between resident use. This directly affected three Residents (#15, #48 and #54) of three observed. The facility also failed to follow their Legionella plan. This had the the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility. Facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. During observation on 08/28/19 at 8:25 A.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 completed a finger stick blood sugar (FSBG) on Resident #48 and returned the glucometer to the top of the medication cart. At 8:33 A.M., LPN #5 used the same glucometer and completed a FSBG on Resident #54. At 8:50 A.M., LPN #5 used the same glucometer and completed a FSBG on Resident #15. LPN #5 did not clean the glucometer in between residents use of the glucometer. Interview with LPN #5 on 08/28/18 at 8:55 A.M. verified she did not clean the glucometer between resident use when checked the residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-08-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the infection control book, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure they had an infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that included antibiotic use and a system to monitor antibiotic use. This had the potential to affect all the residents that resided in the facility. Facility census was 65. Findings include: Review of the infection control book with infection control designee/Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #63 on 08/28/19 at 3:25 P.M. revealed the infection control book only contained surveillance, tracking and resident information that include infections and possible communicable disease for July and August 2019. The infection control book contained no evidence that included antibiotic use nor a system to monitor antibiotic use prior to July 2019. Interview with ADON #63 at the time of the review verified the facility had no evidence of an IPCP that included antibiotic use and a system to monitor antibiotic use. ADON #63 also verified the facility only had surveillance, tracking and resident information that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure, gradual dose reductions (GDR) were made and responded to and acted upon timely. This affected three Residents (#2, #41, and #67) of five reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 11/30/15. Medical diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, encephalopathy, hypothyroidism, occlusion and stenosis of unspecified carotid artery, vitamin B deficiency, heart disease, hyperlipidemia, spinal stenosis, psychosis, depression. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the residents cognition was severely impaired. Resident #2 was noted as being totally dependent for activities of daily living (ADLs) and was noted as always being incontinent of both bladder and bowel. Further review of Resident #2's medical record revealed a pharmacy GDR request dated 04/24/19 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to properly and safely store food items. This had the potential to affect all residents who consumed meals from the facility kitchen. The facility identified one resident (Resident #11) who did not consume food prepared by the kitchen staff. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Observation on 08/25/19 at 8:40 A.M. of the kitchen revealed an open-undated carton of potato salad, open-undated bags of shredded cheese, open-undated thickened juice, open-undated slices of pie and multiple miscellaneous leftovers without dates. There were also multiple open-undated cereals and pretzels in the dry storage area. The walk-in freezer had boxes of frozen meats sitting on the floor in the freezer that had not been placed on the shelves. Interview on 08/25/19 at 8:55 A.M. with Dietary [NAME] (DC) #35 confirmed the open and undated products in the walk-in cooler and in the dry storage. DC #35 also confirmed the boxes of frozen meat in the walk-in freezer that were sitting directly on the floor. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medial record review, observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide meals to all of the residents at a table at the same time. This affected one Resident (#24) of 17 residents observed eating in the dining area on the secured unit. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #24's medical record revealed the resident was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including a left femur fracture and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive deficit. The MDS also identified the resident required extensive one-person assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting and personal hygiene. The resident required only supervision for eating. Review of care plan dated 06/14/19 revealed the resident had a potential nutritional risk related to her femur fracture and dementia. Observation of dining on 08/25/19 from 11:50 A.M. to 12:25 P.M. revealed two State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) #15 and #62 were assisting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, personal funds statement review, staff interview and review of facility policy the facility failed to provide a spend down letter to residents and/or the resident's representative when the resident's personal trust fund account was $200 less than Social Security Income (SSI) resource limit. This affected one Resident (#11) of five reviewed for personal funds accounts. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included heart disease, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, atrial fibrillation, chronic respiratory failure, epilepsy, type two diabetes, and major depressive disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 was severely cognitively impaired with delirium, inattention and altered level of consciousness noted. The MDS also revealed the resident was totally dependent with one person assistance for bed mobility, locomotion, dressing, eating,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, facility record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the required Beneficiary Protection Notifications (BPN) when Medicare Part A residents were discharged from services with skilled days remaining. This affected three Residents (#16, #323 and #324) of four residents reviewed for BPN during the annual survey. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility BPN and medical record review revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged from Medicare Part A Services on 03/22/19 with skilled days remaining. The resident remained in the facility. Further review of the BPN revealed Resident #16 was only provided the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form and was not provided the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNFABN). Interview conducted on 08/27/19 at 11:38 A.M., Social Services (SS) #75 stated he was only able to find verification Resident #16 was provided the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, review of concern forms, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement their abuse and misappropriation policy when they failed to report to the state agency. This affected one Resident (#10) of 24 residents reviewed. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, type two diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, absence of left leg above the knee, falls, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact with no behaviors. Review of the Resident/Family/Staff Concern form dated 05/17/19 revealed Resident #10 reported his laptop missing. Social Service (SS) #75 noted both resident rooms (previous and current) were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, review of concern forms, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure allegations of misappropriation of property were reported to the state agency. This affected one Resident (#10) of 24 residents reviewed. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, type two diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, absence of left leg above the knee, falls, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact with no behaviors. Review of the Resident/Family/Staff Concern form dated 05/17/19 revealed Resident #10 reported his laptop missing. Social Service (SS) #75 noted both resident rooms (previous and current) were searched,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, review of concern forms, review of facility self-reported incidents (SRI), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of misappropriation of property. This affected one Resident (#10) of 24 residents reviewed. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, type two diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, absence of left leg above the knee, falls, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact with no behaviors. Review of the Resident/Family/Staff Concern form dated 05/17/19 revealed Resident #10 reported his laptop missing. Social Service (SS) #75 noted both resident rooms (previous and current) were searched, staff and residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide a notice of transfer/discharge to the resident's representative upon being transferred to the hospital. This affected two Residents (#10 and #48) of four reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, type two diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, absence of left leg above the knee, falls, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact with no behaviors. Review of Section E-Behaviors revealed no behaviors were noted. Review of Section G-Functional Status revealed the resident required extensive one-person assistance with bed mobility, toileting, personal hygiene, dressing, transfer, supervision with setup assistance with eating,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice to the resident's representative upon being transferred to the hospital. This affected two residents (#10 and #48) of four reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, type two diabetes, schizoaffective disorder, absence of left leg above the knee, falls, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the five day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact with no behaviors. Review of Section E-Behaviors revealed no behaviors were noted. Review of Section G-Functional Status revealed the resident required extensive one-person assistance with bed mobility, toileting, personal hygiene, dressing, transfer, supervision with setup assistance with eating, limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set as(MDS) with the required 14 days for residents with a significant change in status. This affected two Residents (#35 and #48) of 20 residents reviewed for MDS assessments during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed being originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Medical diagnosis included cerebral infarction, need for assistance with personal care, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of bronchus or lung, acute or chronic respiratory failure, muscle wasting or or atrophy, muscle weakness, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, anemia, arteriosclerotic heart disease, hypertension and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 was cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment data, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to accurately code data on the resident MDS assessment. This affected one (Resident #26) of 24 residents reviewed during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility 06/27/18 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebrovascular disease, type two diabetes, major depressive disorder, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact, with no behaviors noted. Review of Section G-Functional Status revealed the resident required total one-person dependence with bed mobility, extensive one-person assistance with transfers, toileting, extensive two-person assistance with personal hygiene, supervision and setup with locomotion, one person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure residents had complete and accurate care plans. This affected one Resident (#48) of 20 residents care plans reviewed during the investigation phase of the annual survey. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #48's medical record revealed being admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture of the left tibia, heart failure and altered mental status. Review of the minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive decline. The resident required total dependence for bed mobility, transfers, toileting, dressing and personal hygiene. The resident required only supervision for eating. The resident received medications including anticoagulants, antipsychotics and antidepressants. Review of Resident #48's physician order dated 05/24/19 revealed Eliquis (anticoagulant) five milligrams, give one tablet by mouth two times a day. Review of Resident #48's plan of care dated 07/19/19 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to complete and revise resident care plans. This affected four Residents (#26, #34, #35 and #57) of 24 reviewed during the investigation stage of the annual survey. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #26 was admitted to the facility 06/27/18 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebrovascular disease, type two diabetes, major depressive disorder, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #26 was cognitively intact, with no behaviors noted. Review of Section G-Functional Status revealed the resident required total one-person dependence with bed mobility, extensive one-person assistance with transfers, toileting, extensive two-person assistance with personal hygiene, supervision and setup with locomotion, one person assistance with dressing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, family and staff interview, review of After Visit Summary, review of Medication Error log and review of facility policy the facility failed provide medications with professional standard of quality when a nurse hid medications in food and left the food unattended. This affected two residents (#27 and #60) of 17 residents who received medications on the memory care unit. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #60's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia without behavioral disturbance, history of falling and malignant neoplasm of the large intestine. Review of Resident #60's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive deficit. The resident required extensive one-person physical assistance for bed mobility, transfers, eating, dressing and toileting. The resident required total dependence for personal hygiene. Review of Resident #60's plan of care dated 03/25/19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide mouth care for a dependent resident. This affected one Resident (#11) of one reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease, tracheostomy, gastrostomy, atrial fibrillation, chronic respiratory failure, epilepsy, type two diabetes, and major depressive disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11 was severely cognitively impaired with delirium inattention and altered level of consciousness noted. Review of Section E-Behaviors revealed the resident had rejection of care and physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others was noted one to three days during the lookback period. Review of Section G-Functional Assessment revealed the resident was totally dependent with one-person assistance with bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with activities per the plan of care. This affected one Resident (#17) of two reviewed for activities. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Medical record review for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 02/28/15. Medical diagnoses included encounter for attention to gastrostomy, dysphasia oropharyngeal phase, feeding difficulties, dementia, hypotension, anemia, hyperlipidemia, Alzheimer's, chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes mellitus, anemia, adult failure to thrive, depression, and hypertension. Review of Resident #17's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed, the resident's cognition was severely impaired and the resident required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of Resident #17's care plan revealed Resident #17 would participate in activities of her choice two times per week to promote socialization and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, family interview, staff interview and review of hospital records, the facility failed to provide timely care for one resident and failed to provide proper positioning for one resident. This affected Resident (#61) reviewed for delay of care and Resident (#40) reviewed for positioning. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, myocardial infarction, heart disease, encephalopathy, stage four chronic kidney disease, and hallucinations. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired with delirium inattention and disorganized thinking behaviors continuously present. Review of Section G-Functional Status revealed the resident required total one-person assistance with bed mobility, locomotion, total two-person assistance with transfer, and walking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and resident and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was sent for an ophthalmology referral in a timely manner. This affected one Resident (#70) of one reviewed for vision. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #70's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysarthria following unspecified cerebrovascular disease, mood disorder, generalized osteoarthritis, hypertension, peripheral autonomic neuropathy, anxiety, diaphragmatic hernia without obstruction or gangrene, psoriasis, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, major depressive disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, kidney failure, anemia, and insomnia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognition with no delusions, hallucinations or behaviors. Resident #70 required extensive assistance for activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, resident and staff interview, and review of facility Smoking Policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident assessed to require supervision with smoking was not permitted to possess their own smoking materials. This affected one Resident (#26) of six observed for smoking. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed an admit date of 06/27/19 with diagnoses including hemiplegia, hemiparesis, cerebral infarction, encephalopathy, anemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, depression, insomnia, atrial fibrillation, cerebral atherosclerosis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, vascular disease, anxiety, traumatic amputation of one unspecified lesser toe, subsequent encounter, hypertension, heart disease and aphasia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had no cognitive impairment with no delusions, hallucinations or behaviors. Resident #26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) were performed. This affected three Residents (#2, #41, and #67) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 11/30/15. Medical diagnoses included dementia without behavioral disturbance, encephalopathy, hypothyroidism, occlusion and stenosis of unspecified carotid artery, vitamin B deficiency, heart disease, hyperlipidemia, spinal stenosis, psychosis, depression. Review of Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2's cognition was severely impaired. Resident #2 was noted as being totally dependent for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and was noted as always incontinent of both bladder and bowel. 2. Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed an admission date of 03/08/18. Diagnosis included difficulty in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed and open medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain residents medical records in a complete and accurate manor. This affected two Resident's #21 and #35) of six reviewed. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility [DATE]. The resident expired on [DATE]. Further review of the medical record revealed no documentation of the resident expiring and of the release of her body. Review of the last progress note dated [DATE] at 11:43 A.M. revealed hospice was with the resident full time. The resident was resting comfortably in her bed with no verbal vocalization, only moans and groans noted. The resident was able to take her medication orally. The daughter called to check on the resident and spoke with her briefly. Interview conducted on [DATE] at 8:55 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #18 verified the medical record did not contain documentation of Resident #21's death. LPN #18…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2024-11-12 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on employee record review, review of the facility Bureau of Criminal Investigation (BCI) log, staff interview, and policy review, the facility to implement their abuse policy to ensure an employee had a background check completed with the results received timely. The had the potential to affect all 67 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the employee record for Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #120 was hired on 04/03/24. CNA #120's fingerprint background check was completed on 05/03/24, with facility receiving the results on 05/13/24. Review of the BCI log for the facility revealed CNA #120 was hired on 04/03/24, fingerprints were completed on 05/03/24 and the results were received on 05/13/24. Interview on 11/12/24 at 2:00 P.M. with Human Resource Director #680 confirmed CNA #120 was hired on 04/03/24 and her fingerprint results were not received at the facility until 05/13/24. Interview also confirmed CNA #120 was not terminated and continued to work for the facility after 05/03/24, which was 30 days from her hire date.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$28,130 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $28,130 — penalty dated 2025-04-08
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.
- AAA EMINENT LLC — investment firm · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- AAA HOLDCO LLC — investment firm · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest
- AAA OPCO LLC — investment firm · 100.00% share · 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest
Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| S & T BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | since 12/12/2017 |
| AUSCH, CHAIM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/31/2024 |
| GELDZAHLER, YAAKOV | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/31/2024 |
| ZSEREBROWSKI, YECHEZKEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/31/2024 |
| EMINENT CARE GROUP LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2024 |
| MACK, LAUREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/31/2024 |
| SMITH, JAZMAINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2024 |
| ARMSTEAD PHARMACY PROVIDER SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2024 |
| CARERITE SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2024 |
| GREEN OAKS REALTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/11/2017 |
| HOWARD, WESHBALE & CO. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2024 |
| MED-NET COMPLIANCE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2024 |
| BAKER, REBECCA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2024 |
| BERNER, SUSAN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2024 |
| MOSS, AMBER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2024 |
| WINDSOR, MURICA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/31/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $691K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365601. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.