No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Atrium Nursing and Rehabilitation

1301 North Monroe Drive, Xenia, OH 45385 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (937) 372-4495 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0607) — cited Dec 2025Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0569)1 immediate-jeopardy citation2 immediate-jeopardy citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$193,839 in federal fines3 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0607), cited Dec 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 2 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $193,839 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-14)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1157 N Monroe Dr Ste 220 · (937) 374-3484 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
104 N Detroit St · (937) 372-5480 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1308 N Detroit St · (937) 376-0143 · Call to confirm hours
Park
436 Towler Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2026-03 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.1%5.3%15.4%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%6.2%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.9%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.2%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened0.0%6.1%16.1%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication44.4%25.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.1%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%3.4%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control3.8%21.4%21.2%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.11U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 57% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.31
RN hours/ resident / day
0.60
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.03
RN hoursweekends
63.0%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 15.8 residents a day — about 16% occupied, or roughly 83 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.31 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.42 to 1.03 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-11)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

54 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on review of the medical record, review of a facility self-reported incident (SRI), observations, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide supervision and intervention to prevent Resident #31, who had impaired cognition, was at risk for elopement and resided on a secured behavioral unit, from leaving the facility unsupervised. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when one resident (Resident #31) was placed at potential risk for serious life-threatening harm and/or injury when the resident eloped from his bedroom window without staff knowledge and was found 2.6 miles from the facility pushing a shopping cart in a shopping center parking lot. This affected one (#31) of five residents reviewed for risk for elopement. The facility identified a total of 11 residents who were at risk for elopement. The facility census was 45. On 06/20/24 at 2:01 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-01-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on closed record review, hospital record review, laboratory results review, staff and physician interview, and policy review, the facility failed to properly monitor Coumadin (an anticoagulant medication) use for Resident #20. Resident #20 had a high Prothrombin Time/International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR) (a laboratory test to measure how long it takes for blood to clot) of 52.4 seconds (PT) and 4.9 (INR) that was drawn on [DATE] and was not reported to the physician until [DATE]. Resident #20 was to have the next PT/INR drawn on [DATE]; however, it was not obtained. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, negative health outcomes, and/or death when Resident #20 was having nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea on [DATE] and was hospitalized where she received seven units of Packed Red Blood Cells (PRBC) via transfusion and KCentra (a Coumadin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, review of the facility's self-reported incidents (SRIs), review of personnel records, review of the facility investigation, review of a police report, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy, recognize sexual abuse of a resident by a staff member, thoroughly investigate an allegation sexual abuse and failed to protect one resident (#28) from continued sexual abuse and exploitation due to staff failing to intervene when they learned of Housekeeper #100 having a sexual encounter with Resident #28 in his room. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy on 07/28/23 at approximately 5:13 P.M., when Resident #28 who had a history of anoxic brain damage, psychoactive substance abuse with psychoactive substance induced mood disorder, encephalopathy, and paranoid schizophrenia was found having a sexual encounter with Housekeeper #100 in his room. This affected one (#28) of three residents reviewed for abuse in the facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, review of a fall investigation, observations, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for a resident identified at high risk for falls and failed to conduct a thorough investigation to determine root cause analysis to identify potential hazards and resident-specific interventions to reduce and/or eliminate falls and falls with injury. This resulted in Actual Harm when Resident #07 fell from the bed that was not in the lowest position and sustained a leg fracture requiring surgical intervention. This affected one (#07) of three residents reviewed for falls. The census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #07's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/20/20. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, hypertension, anxiety disorder, and epilepsy. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-27 · tag F0627 — widespread
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to document in the medical record the reason for a facility initiated transfer to another facility when the facility temporarily ceased operations. This affected all 16 residents who had resided in the building and were transferred. Additionally, the facility failed to provide sufficient preparation and involvement with the residents and legal guardians prior to transferring residents. This affected three (#17, #18 and #15) out of three records reviewed for transfers. A total of 16 residents were transferred from the facility. The current census was zero. Findings include:Observation and concurrent interview on 05/27/26 at 7:53 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed there were no residents in the facility. 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 05/08/26. Diagnoses included major depressive disorder, dementia, and generalized anxiety disorder.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-27 · tag F0628 — widespread
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to provide written notification to residents and the resident's representatives before the transfer of residents to another facility due to a temporary closure, failed notify the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman prior to transferring residents, and failed to notify the State Survey Agency of the plan for the transfers and adequate relocation of the residents. This affected all 16 residents residing in the facility and transferred due to a temporary closure of the facility. The facility census was zero. Findings include:Observation and interview on 05/27/26 at 7:53 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there were no residents in the facility. Review of the discharge log revealed the first resident was transferred on 03/20/26. A total of 16 residents were transferred from the facility with the last two transfers occurring on 05/08/26. Interview on 05/27/26 at 8:21 A.M. with Resident #17's Power of Attorney (POA) revealed they received the notice of discharge on the day Resident #17 was moved out of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-27 · tag F0846 — widespread
    Have policies and procedures ensuring the administrator's responsibilities for facility closure are completed successfully.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to submit the appropriate closure plan procedures to the State Agency regarding the temporary closure of the facility and failed to notify the Ombudsman's office prior to the relocation of the residents. This affected all residents previously residing in the facility. The facility census was zero. Findings include-Observation and interview on 05/27/26 at 7:53 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there were no residents in the facility. Review of the submitted documents to the State Agency revealed no receipt of the facility's closure plan procedures. Review of the discharge log revealed the first resident was transferred on 03/20/26. A total of 16 residents were transferred from the facility with the last two transfers occurring on 05/08/26.Review of the Ombudsman notification provided by the facility revealed Ombudsman notification of the closure was made on 04/23/26.Interview on 05/27/26 at 10:42 A.M. with the Social Service Director (SSD) #2 revealed the facility started transferring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, review of witness statements, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), and policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy with an allegation of sexual abuse. This affected one (Resident #06) out of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 18. Findings include: Review of Resident #06's chart revealed Resident #49 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, acquired absence of right leg above the knee, peripheral vascular disease, essential hypertension, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity with agitation, obesity, and Duchenne or [NAME] muscular dystrophy. Review of Resident #06's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the facility's self-reported incidents (SRIs) from 08/01/25 to 12/07/25, revealed the facility had not reported any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, review of witness statements, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the state survey agency in a timely manner. This affected one (Resident #06) out of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 18.Findings include: Review of Resident #06's chart revealed Resident #49 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, acquired absence of right leg above the knee, peripheral vascular disease, essential hypertension, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity with agitation, obesity, and Duchenne or [NAME] muscular dystrophy. Review of Resident #06's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the facility's self-reported incidents (SRIs) from 08/01/25 to 12/07/25, revealed the facility had not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, review of witness statements, review of Self-Reported Incidents (SRI), and policy review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of sexual abuse. This affected one (Resident #06) out of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 18.Findings include: Review of Resident #06's chart revealed Resident #49 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, acquired absence of right leg above the knee, peripheral vascular disease, essential hypertension, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere unspecified severity with agitation, obesity, and Duchenne or [NAME] muscular dystrophy. Review of Resident #06's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the facility's self-reported incidents (SRIs) from 08/01/25 to 12/07/25, revealed the facility had not reported any allegations of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted to the Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services (CMS) timely. This affected three Residents (#03, #08, and #10) of three residents reviewed for resident assessments. The census was 18.Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #03's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/22/21. Diagnoses listed included type one diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, and major depressive disorder. Review of MDS assessments revealed a quarterly assessment was completed 10/03/25. There was no record of the MDS assessment being transmitted to or accepted by CMS. The last quarterly MDS was completed and accepted 07/03/25. 2) Review of Resident #08's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/16/24. Diagnoses listed included type one diabetes mellitus, pseudobulbar effect, and Parkinson's disease.Review of MDS assessments revealed a quarterly assessment was completed 09/19/25. There was no record of the MDS assessment being transmitted to or accepted by CMS. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive care plan was updated. This affected one (Resident #09) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 18.Findings include: Review of Resident #09's medical record revealed and admission date of 09/29/25. Diagnoses listed included schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and obsessional thoughts and acts. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #09 was cognitively intact. Review of psychiatric physician note dated 11/17/25 for Resident #09 revealed a new diagnosis of schizophrenia was added. Diagnoses of major depression and anxiety were listed upon admission [DATE]. Review of Resident #09's comprehensive care plan dated 12/02/25 revealed no focus, goals, or interventions for schizophrenia, anxiety, or major depressive disorder. Interview with MDS Nurse #26 on 12/09/25 at 2:25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of a facility census document, the facility failed to ensure adequate hot water was supplied to a common shower room and resident rooms. This affected six (#8, #9, #11, #12, #13, and #19) of 19 residents that resided at the facility. The facility census was 19. Findings include: Observation of Maintenance Aide (MA) #244 taking the water temperatures on 06/22/25 beginning at 10:19 A.M. revealed the hot water temperature in the 500 Hall shower room was 97.8 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the hot water temperature in Resident #8's room was 95.6 degrees F, the hot water temperature in Resident #9's room was 93.1 degrees F, the hot water temperature in Resident #11's room was 88.8 degrees F, and the hot water temperature in Resident #12's room was 88.9 degrees F. Interview with MA #244 on 06/22/25 at 10:19 A.M., during observation of the hot water temperatures, verified the hot water temperature in the 500 Hall shower room, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #11, and Resident #12's rooms were not supplying an adequate hot water source. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 manual, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and submitted per the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services requirements. This affected six (#4, #8, #13, #16, #17, and #18) of 19 residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility census was 19. Findings included: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #4 revealed an admission on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to muscular dystrophy, heart failure, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and contractures of the hand. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/20/25 for Resident #4 revealed the resident had intact cognition. Resident #4 was coded as dependent for eating, toileting, bed mobility, and transfers. The assessment was completed and locked on 06/02/25 and submitted to the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) on 06/04/25. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of a facility census document, medical record review, review of water temperature logs, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure hot water temperatures were maintained in a safe manner. This affected 13 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #10, #14, #15, #16, #17, and #18) of 19 residents that resided at the facility. The facility census was 19. Findings include: Observation of Maintenance Aide (MA) #244 taking the water temperatures on 06/22/25 at 10:19 A.M. revealed the hot water temperature in the 600 shower room was 136.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F), the hot water temperature in Resident #1 and Resident #10's room was 134.7 degrees F, the hot water temperature in Resident #2's room was 135.9 degrees F, the hot water temperature in Resident #3's room was 134.6 degrees F, the hot water temperature in Resident #4's room was 136.6 degrees F, the hot water temperature in Resident #5's room was 134.1 degrees F, the hot water temperature in Resident #6's room was 133.4 degrees F, the hot water temperature in Resident #7's room was 136.5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, review of resident trust documentation, review of a resident census report, and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure residents whose care was funded by Medicaid had personal funds in excess of fifty dollars ($50.00) deposited and held in an interest bearing account. This affected one (#8) of four residents reviewed for resident funds accounts. The facility census was 19. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and hypertension. Review of Resident #8's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #8's resident funds authorization dated 12/04/23 revealed Resident #8's guardian authorized the facility to hold, safeguard,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, review of shower schedules, review of shower sheets, resident and staff interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument manual, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurate. This affected one (#13) of five residents reviewed for accurate MDS assessments. The facility censes was 19. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #13 revealed an admission dated of 11/23/21 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, acute and chronic respiratory failure, anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, hallucinations and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #13 revealed the resident had intact cognition. Resident #13 required set up for eating, was dependent for toileting, and required moderate assistance for bed mobility. Resident #13 was not coded with any rejections of care during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure wound care on a resident's surgical wound was completed based on the physician's order. This affected one (#10) of one resident reviewed for surgical wounds. The facility census was 19. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition, chronic multifocal osteomyelitis, asthma, anxiety disorder, frostbite with tissue necrosis of the left foot, alcohol abuse, peripheral vascular disease, and gangrene. Review of Resident #10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and the resident required moderate assistance with showers. Resident #10 was independent with eating, rolling left and right, sitting to lying, and lying to sitting and required set up assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff and resident interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure application of prescribed foot care treatments were completed as ordered. This affected one (#18) of one residents reviewed for prescribed foot treatments. This facility census was 19. Findings included: Medical record review for Resident #18 revealed an admission of 01/18/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, mild neurocognitive disorder without behaviors, cerebral infarction without residual residual, hypertension, late syphilis latent, and myocardial infarction. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #18 revealed the resident had an intact cognition. Resident #18 was coded with behaviors including rejection of care four to six days in the assessment period. Resident #18 was assessed to require supervision for eating, toileting, personal hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers. Resident #18 had no skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of a facility provided medication administration time verification document, staff interview, and review of a facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered within prescribed timeframes. This affected one (#7) of one resident reviewed for pain medication administration. The facility census was 19. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #7 revealed an admission date of 12/28/18 with diagnoses of quadriplegia, morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 was cognitively intact, required supervision assistance with eating, required partial assistance with oral hygiene, required substantial assistance with bed mobility, and was dependent on staff assistance with toileting hygiene, bathing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were reviewed and addressed in a timely manner. This affected one (#9) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 19. Findings include: Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease affecting the right non-dominant side, cerebral infarction, insomnia, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, generalized anxiety disorder, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsions, bipolar disorder, and Behcet's disease. Review of Resident #9's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #9's physician order dated 12/16/24 revealed the resident was ordered the narcotic pain medication tramadol 50 milligrams (mg) every eight hours as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, resident and staff interview, hospice staff interviews, hospice contract review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure collaboration with hospice providers for resident care. This affected two (#1 and #13) of two residents reviewed for hospice care. The facility census was 19. Findings include: 1. Medical record review for Resident #13 revealed an admission dated of 11/23/21 with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), emphysema, acute and chronic respiratory failure, anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, hypertension, and hallucinations. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #13 revealed the resident had an intact cognition. Resident #13 required set up for eating, was dependent for toileting, required moderate assistance for bed mobility, and transfers were not applicable. Resident #13 was coded as receiving hospice services during the look back period.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, review of the Legionella Environmental Risk Assessment, review of the Water Management Plan, review of the Legionella Control measures and Monitoring, review of water temperature logs, review of weekly monitoring logs, review of the online resources from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow their Water Management Plan and Legionella Risk Assessment. This had the potential to affect all 18 residents who resided in the facility. The facility census was 18. Findings include: Review of the Water Management Plan-Legionella, dated 11/2021, revealed the facility would establish water management plans for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in the facility's water system by having proactive endeavors to establish and maintain a healthy, infection free environment for the residents, staff and visitors. The facility would develop, implement and maintain an infection prevention and control program in order to prevent, recognize, and control the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment. This had the potential to affect all 18 residents residing on the secured behavioral unit. The facility census was 18. Findings included: Observation of the common areas of the secured behavioral unit on 02/03/25 at 10:15 A.M., revealed a fur like material and dirt hanging off of the large heat register/vents affixed to the walls. The floors throughout the unit were soiled and appeared dirty. Observation of the secured behavioral unit on 02/05/25 at 8:22 A.M. with the Registered Nurse (RN) #127, revealed an unlocked, unoccupied resident room with multiple stacks of supplies that ran the entire length of the room and numerous boxes were stacked to the ceiling. There were multiple trash bags of unopened incontinence briefs, trash and various debris scattered throughout the floor, and large metal rails leaned up against the walls. Interview with RN #127 at same time, verified the condition of the room. RN #127 stated the unoccupied, resident's room was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to convey resident funds within 30 days of residents being discharged from the facility. This affected three Residents (#87, #88 and #89) out of the five residents reviewed for conveyance of personal funds. The facility census was 18. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #87 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included gout, congestive heart failure, generalized anxiety disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, muscle weakness, and hypothyroidism. Resident #87 discharged from the facility on 08/30/24. Review of a Resident Funds Authorization, for Resident #87 dated 03/20/23, revealed the authorization was signed by Resident #87's responsible party. The authorization was also witnessed by a non-employee. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #87 was cognitively intact. Review of a progress note for Resident #87 dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' advanced directives were updated and accurate in the medical record. This affected one Resident (#30) out of the two residents reviewed for advanced directives. The facility census was 18. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #30 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, hemiplegia, bipolar disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), bipolar disorder, essential primary hypertension, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus (DM), insomnia, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of a physician order dated 11/19/24 for Resident #30, revealed the resident was ordered to be Do Not Resuscitate Comfort Care (DNR-CC). Review of an DNR-CC paper form dated 11/19/24 and signed by the physician, revealed Resident #30 was marked as a DNR-CC. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a comfortable, safe, and homelike environment. This affected three Residents (#25, #30 and #29) of three residents reviewed for environment. The facility census was 18. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #25 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included anxiety disorder, anemia, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, homicidal ideations, auditory hallucinations, psychotic disorder with delusions due to a known physiological condition, hyperlipidemia, hypertension and mood disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #25 dated 10/26/24, revealed Resident #25 was cognitively intact, and required supervision for activities of daily living (ADLs). Observation of Resident #25's bathroom on 02/03/25 at 9:51 A.M., revealed Resident #25's bathroom had an approximately one foot in length by one foot in width…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents, and their representatives were offered and received care conferences or the ability to participate in care planning. This affected two Residents (#18 and #19) out of the two residents reviewed for participation in care planning and care conferences. The facility census was 18. Findings include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #18 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, schizoaffective disorder and insomnia. Review of medical record from 08/22/24 to 02/04/25 revealed there was no documentation that Resident #18 or her guardian were offered or received a care conference. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]. revealed Resident #18 was cognitively intact and required supervision for Activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to obtain signed refusal forms for vaccinations and failed to obtain any information related to prior immunizations and vaccinations for newly admitted residents. This affected two Residents (#08, and #13) out of five Residents reviewed for immunizations and vaccinations. The facility census was 18. Findings Include: 1) Review of the medical record for Resident #08 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included schizoaffective disorder, schizophrenia, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus (DM), gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), and anxiety disorder. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/09/25, revealed Resident #08 had impaired cognition. Review of Resident #08's vaccination record, revealed the resident was documented as refusing an influenza vaccine on 11/07/24, the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination on 03/07/24 and the pneumococcal bacteria vaccination on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a Registered Nurse (RN) scheduled for at least eight consecutive hours daily. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the staffing schedules revealed there was no RN scheduled on the following dates: 07/07/24, 07/11/24, 07/15/24, 07/16/24, 07/20/24, 07/21/24, 07/25/24, 07/26/24, 07/29/24, 07/31/24, 08/03/24, and 08/04/24. Interview on 08/08/24 at 3:56 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the facility did not have an RN working for eight consecutive hours on the following dates: 07/07/24, 07/11/24, 07/15/24, 07/16/24, 07/20/24, 07/21/24, 07/25/24, 07/26/24, 07/29/24, 07/31/24, 08/03/24, and 08/04/24.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: 1) Observation on 08/08/24 at 10:48 A.M., revealed a fly swatter on a cart next to the oven. Interview at the same time, District Dietary Manager (DDM) #400 verified the fly swatter was on the cart next to the oven. Observation on 08/08/24 at 12:07 P.M. revealed three flies continuously flying above and around the steam table. Interview on 08/08/24 at 12:08 P.M., [NAME] #405 verified the flies were present and stated flies were always in kitchen. 2) Observation on 08/08/24 at 10:49 A.M., revealed a puddle of water, measuring approximately one foot by four feet below the three-compartment sink. Dietary Manager (DM) #410 took a mop and cleaned up the water from the floor. Interview on 08/08/24 at 10:51 A.M., [NAME] #405 verified the puddle below the three -compartment sink and stated every time he washed dishes, the sink leaked. [NAME] #405…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility's mold testing results, physician interview, review of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) documentation, and staff interview, the facility failed to inform Medical Director (MD) #500 of high levels of mold discovered in the facility. This had the potential to affect all the residents of the facility. The census was 41. Findings include: Review of an Environmental and Residential Microbial Inspection Report dated 05/13/24, revealed the facility was inspected for mold on 05/08/24 by a mold testing speciality company. The areas tested for mold revealed the following areas: a) room [ROOM NUMBER] (unoccupied). b) 200 Hall shower room. c) 300 hallway. d) Therapy room. e) A common area. f) The main dining room. The mold readings in these areas were compared to readings from outside the facility. The results in the tested areas revealed higher levels of mold than outside of the facility and mold remediation was required to be completed. Review of QAPI meeting documents dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, review of facility audits, and review of operation manuals, the facility failed to ensure essential equipment was maintained in a safe and properly functioning manner. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 41. Findings include: 1) Observation on 08/08/24 at 10:36 A.M., revealed an ice machine at the entrance to the 200 hall, had a wet blanket laying under it with a puddle of water, which extended beyond the area of the blanket. Water was observed dripping onto the floor from the bottom of the machine. Interview at the same time, State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #308 verified the wet blanket over the puddle of water. STNA #308 picked up the wet blanket and walked away from the area. Observation on 08/08/24 at 12:33 P.M., revealed another puddle of water had formed below the ice machine. Interview at the same time with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #317, verified the presence of the puddle of water below the ice machine. LPN #317 verified the ice machine was leaking from the bottom. 2)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, mold testing company interview, staff interview, and review of the facility's mold testing results, the facility failed to abate and remediate the presence of mold in the facility and the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a clean, safe, homelike environment. This had the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of an Environmental and Residential Microbial Inspection Report dated 05/13/24, revealed the facility was inspected for mold on 05/08/24 by a specialty mold testing company. The areas tested in the facility for mold were room [ROOM NUMBER], the shower room on the 200-hall, the 300-hallway, the therapy room, a common area, and the main dining room. The mold readings in these areas were compared to mold readings from outside the facility. The results in the tested areas revealed higher levels of mold than outside of the facility and mold remediation was required. The following remediation was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, resident and staff interviews, review of the facility policy, the facility failed to provide a clean and safe environment for residents. This affected 12 (#28, #69, #32, #33, #35, #36, #17, #02, #03, #05, #06 and #07) residents out of 12 residents reviewed. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Record review for Resident #28 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cellulitis, hypothyroidism, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, morbid obesity, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and chronic respiratory failure. Resident #28 was cognitively intact. Record review for Resident #69 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), anxiety disorder, depression, hyperlipidemia, essential primary hypertension, obesity, and bipolar disorder. Resident #69 was cognitively intact. Record review for Resident #32 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe environment for residents. This affected three (#39, #40, and #41) out of four residents sampled for the physical environment and the potential to affect all independently ambulatory residents 100 hallway (#04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #11, #12, and #13). The census was 72. Findings include: 1. Observations on 03/11/24 at 1:46 P.M. revealed a wooden pallet leaning against the wall and hand railing in the 100 hall. A deflated bed air mattress was sitting on the floor beside the pallet. Observation and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/11/24 at 2:42 P.M. confirmed the wooden pallet and deflated bed air mattress in the 100 hall. The DON stated it was unacceptable and would be a hazard to ambulatory residents. Review of facility provided documentation revealed 100 hall Residents (#04, #05, #06, #07, #08, #11, #12, and #13) were independent with ambulation. 2. Review of Resident #39's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/31/22. Diagnoses listed included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to have an effective pest control program. This affected four (#05, #06, #07, and #08) out of four residents reviewed for pest control. The census was 72. Findings include: Review of Resident #05's medical record revealed an admission date of 04/19/23. Diagnoses listed included major depressive disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and psychotic substance abuse disorder. Review of Resident #06's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/20/23. Diagnoses listed included disorganized schizophrenia, metabolic encephalopathy, and alcohol abuse. Review of Resident #07's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/20/20. Diagnoses listed included schizoaffective disorder, dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, hypertension, anxiety disorder, and epilepsy. Review of Resident #08's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/25/23. Diagnoses listed included Parkinson's disease, schizophrenia, dementia, anxiety disorder, and hypertension. Observation on 03/11/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a comfortable, safe, and homelike environment by ensuring the residents had hot water. This affected 33 residents (#41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, and #73) out of 72 residents at the facility. The facility census was 72. Finding include: Review of the plumbing contractor proposal dated 01/18/24 revealed the facility was quoted $15,243.00 to replace a water heater. Review of a second plumbing contractor proposal dated 01/24/24 revealed the facility was quoted $12,500.00 to replace a water heater. Review of facility's water temperature documentation dated 02/15/24 revealed the water temperature on the secured unit ranged from 75 degrees Fahrenheit to 98 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of facility's water temperature documentation dated 02/28/24 revealed the water temperature on the secured unit ranged from 80 degrees Fahrenheit to 98 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-04 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain essential equipment to provide hot water to the residents. This affected 33 residents (#41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, and #73) out of 72 residents at the facility. The facility census was 72. Finding include: Review of the plumbing contractor proposal dated 01/18/24 revealed the facility was quoted $15,243 to replace a water heater. Review of a second plumbing contractor proposal dated 01/24/24 revealed the facility was quoted $12,500 to replace a water heater. Review of facility's water temperature documentation log dated 02/15/24 revealed the water temperature on the secured unit ranged from 75 degrees Fahrenheit to 98 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of facility's water temperature documentation log dated 02/28/24 revealed the water temperature on the secured unit ranged from 80 degrees Fahrenheit to 98 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an egress door's push bar was maintained and working properly on the secured behavioral unit. This affected 33 residents (#41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55, #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #64, #65, #66, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, and #73) out of 72 residents at the facility. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Observation of the secured unit's interior egress right side door on 03/04/24 at 7:47 A.M. revealed the door had a sign which indicated Push until alarm sounds - Door can be opened in 15 seconds. The door did not have a push bar to exit the unit to the main common area of the facility, but the door was noted to have two gold pieces attached to the right door where the push bar had previously been attached to the door. Further observation of secured unit revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #801 was pulling the metal lip open on the left door to exit the unit instead of pressing on the right door that had the missing push bar.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure portable space heaters were not used in resident accessible areas. This had the potential to affect 28 Residents (#2, #4, #5, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13. #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, #19, #20, #21, #23, #24, #25, #26, #28, #29, #32, #33, #34, and #35) who were able to access a common/dining area. The census was 59. Findings include: Entrance conference interview with the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO) #150 on 12/13/23 at 1:45 P.M. revealed the facility's central heating was not operating adequately. Portable electric space heaters were being used in some resident areas. Observation during tour the facility with the Administrator, DON, and Maintenance Supervisor (MS) #100 on 12/13/23 from 1:55 P.M. to 2:10 P.M. revealed two portable electric space heaters being used in the common/dining area located between resident halls. Observation and interview with MS #100 on 12/13/23 at 2:58 P.M. revealed one portable electric space heater in the common/dining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of a plumbing company repair estimate, the facility failed to ensure a clean and sanitary kitchen due to a substance backing up through a drain in a kitchen closet. This had the potential to affect all the residents in the facility except one resident (#70) who did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 59. Findings included: Observation on 01/02/24 at 12:15 P.M. of the facility kitchen revealed a closet located in the kitchen which contained roasters, baking pans, and other dishes on shelves. The observation revealed 75% of the closet floor was coated in a tarnish-orange substance that was about one-inch thick in width. The substance was noted to have large clumps of debris and a foul odor. Interview on 01/02/24 at 12:16 P.M. with Dietary Manager #175 stated she had been with the facility since October 2023 and the substance in the closet had been coming up through a drain weekly since she started at the facility. Dietary Manager #175 stated the kitchen staff would clean up the substance with towels as time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review, staff and resident interviews, and interview with receptionist at wound clinic, the facility failed to ensure resident was seen by the wound clinic physician as scheduled. This affected one resident (#34) out of the three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 59. Findings included: Review of the medical record for Resident # 34 revealed an admission date of 02/27/23 with medical diagnoses of insomnia, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), diabetes mellitus (DM) with foot ulcer, hypertension, and anxiety. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0, dated 10/07/23, which indicated Resident #34 was cognitively intact and required set-up assistance with eating and toilet hygiene and was independent with bed mobility and transfers. The MDS indicated Resident #34 had a diabetic foot ulcer with dressing changes noted. Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed a physician order, dated 08/29/23, to refer to wound clinic related to non-healing chronic diabetic foot ulcer.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, observations, and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent a resident's elopement and failed to timely identify the root cause of the resident's elopement. This affected one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility identified 29 residents residing on the secured unit. The facility census was 63. Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 09/14/23 with diagnoses including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, non-insulin diabetes mellitus, and obesity. Resident #1 was responsible for himself and had a brother listed as a contact person. Resident #1 resided on the secured unit during his stay from 09/14/23 to 10/11/23. Review of an elopement assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was not an elopement risk. Review of the care plan initiated 09/15/23 revealed Resident #1 refused bathing, hygiene, blood sugar monitoring, and medications at times. He had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-05 · tag F0576 — widespread
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the phone system was working properly. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Observation on 10/02/23 revealed when calling the facility, an automated message answered and gave the option to press one for admissions, two for nursing, three for the Administrator, and zero for immediate assistance. At 2:04 P.M. option one was chosen, with no answer and they automated message stated extension 110 was unavailable and the mailbox was full. A second call was placed at 2:06 P.M. the automated message answered and option two was chosen, the message stated extension 110 was unavailable and the mailbox was full. A third call was placed at 2:21 P.M. and the automated message answered and option zero was chosen, the message stated extension 110 was unavailable and the mailbox was full. At 2:23 P.M. the automated message answered and option three was chosen, the message stated extension 110 was unavailable and the mailbox was full. At 2:24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and review of personnel files, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were trained and competent to perform the job duties prior to beginning employment. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. Facility census was 68. Findings include: Interview on 10/03/23 at 9:12 A.M. with Kitchen Staff #37 revealed the first time he worked at the facility was on 09/22/23 he had his Tuberculosis (TB) testing and background checks prior to working. Kitchen Staff #37 confirmed when he worked on 09/22/23 he did not fully complete the facility orientation to work in the kitchen. The facility confirmed all 68 residents receive their meals from the kitchen. Interview on 10/03/23 at 11:13 A.M. with Human Resources (HR) #42 revealed Kitchen Staff #37 was hired on 09/07/23 and went through the entire process of TB testing, background check, physical and then we never heard from the staff member. HR #42 stated the facility thought Kitchen Staff #37 decided not to take the dietary position he was hired for, and then on 09/22/23 he just showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure recipes were followed. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 68. Findings include: Interview on 10/03/23 at 8:32 A.M. with Kitchen Staff #31 revealed for breakfast she prepared an egg, sausage and cheese casserole. Kitchen Staff #31 stated she could not find the egg and sausage strata recipe, nor the serving size or scoop size, as she pointed to four large binders on the counter, so she Googled the recipe. Kitchen Staff #31 added the recipe called for bread, and since they were already serving wheat toast, she altered the recipe to keep the bread out. Interview and observation on 10/03/23 at 1:17 P.M. with Dietary Manager (DM) #32 revealed after some effort she was able to find the egg and strata recipe in the large binder she brought along. DM #32 verified the proper recipe and proper utensil was not used for serving. DM #32 shared her company would provide production sheets with recipes adjusted for required servings. The egg and strata sheet had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a physical environment was maintained in a safe and sanitary manner regarding the presence of a black substance on the wall in the laundry room. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents residing in the facility. Additionally, the facility also failed to ensure a homelike environment was maintained regarding a sticky substance on the floors and a towel around a toilet to catch urine. This affected three residents (#18, #19 and #20) out of three residents sampled for comfortable living environment. Facility census was 68. Findings include: 1. Interview on 10/02/23 at 1:48 P.M. with Laundry Staff #36 verified awareness of mold in the laundry area. At 2:08 P.M. observation of the laundry area revealed an approximate four foot by six-foot area behind the washing machines of multiple, scattered, splotchy blackened areas. Laundry Staff #36 revealed the area had been repaired in the past and added the workers did not do a very good job. Interview and observation on 10/04/23 at 11:12 A.M. with Maintenance Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain air conditioning equipment to keep resident rooms at a comfortable temperature. This affected one (#17) out of three residents sampled for comfortable room temperatures. Facility census was 68. Findings include: Interview and observation on 10/04/23 at 10:29 A.M. with Resident #17 revealed the wall unit air conditioner in the room was not on and there was a small (approximately three feet by 1.5 feet) portable air conditioning unit in front of it. A four-foot oscillating fan was beside the bed across from Resident #17 and her room mate who were sitting in their wheelchairs. The room was noticeably warmer than the hall and other resident rooms. Resident #17 shared the wall unit air conditioner had been broken all summer, and she had purchased the fan to help keep her cool. Resident #17 acknowledged she found it hard to sleep some nights because of the heat. Observation on 10/04/23 at 10:34 A.M. revealed Maintenance Staff #38 checked the temperature of Resident #17's room with a digital thermometer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure resident call lights were working correctly. This affected three (#17, #21 and #22) out of three residents residents sampled for functioning call lights. Facility census was 68. Findings included: Interview and observation on 10/03/23 at 8:18 A.M. with Resident #22 revealed his call light did not work. Resident #22 pressed the call button and no light was observed on the call box, and the light on top of the room door did not light. Resident #22 was unsure how long it had been broken. Interview on 10/03/23 at 9:26 A.M. with Maintenance Staff #38 revealed he was aware of several call lights that were not working, and the facility had contacted an outside company to provide the repairs. Interview on 10/03/23 at 10:42 A.M. with the Maintenance Manager #57 revealed he was aware several call lights were not working. Maintenance Manager #57 explained the facility was an old building, with an old system and an outside company had been contacted for repairs. Maintenance Manager #57 stated the rooms affected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on personnel file review, review of the job description, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manager met the qualifications to be a dietary manager. This had the potential to affect 72 of 72 residents who receive meals from the kitchen. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the personnel file for Dietary Manager (DM) #282 revealed he was promoted from [NAME] to Dietary Manager on 07/05/23. There was no documentation in DM #282's employee file that indicated he met one of the qualifications to be a dietary manager. Interview on 08/24/23 at 10:55 A.M., with DM #282 confirmed he did not have the certification required for the Dietary Manager position. Interview on 08/23/23 at 2:26 P.M., with the Registered Dietician (RD) #300 confirmed she was a contracted employee who was scheduled to work one day per week at the facility. Interview on 08/24/23 at 4:29 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed she was not aware that DM #282 did not have certification for the Dietary Manager position. Review of the facility undated job description titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, menu review, record review of Registered Dietitian (RD) reports, policy review, RD interview and staff interview, the facility failed to follow the facility menus to ensure the residents received nutritional meals to meet their needs as approved by the RD. This had the potential to affect 72 of 72 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the Food Preparation, Meal Service and Dining Observation dated 07/31/23 revealed Registered Dietitian (RD) #300 noted menus, recipes, and spreadsheets were not available for therapeutic diets. Review of the Dietitian Quality Assurance Report dated 07/31/23, revealed RD #300 reported concerns with menus, dietary recommendations, and modified diets. Comments included the kitchen did not have access to menus or knowledge of options for therapeutic diets (i.e., carbohydrate controlled, renal, reduced sodium, etc.). Review of the facility's RD approved menu dated 08/23/23 revealed the facility lunch meal revealed the following was to be served: 3/4 cup of Korean barbeque…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review of menus, resident interviews, staff interviews, resident council minute review, policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing and safe temperature and acceptable palatability. This had the potential to affect 72 of 72 residents who received meals in the facility. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Review of the facility's Resident Council Meeting Notes, dated 05/03/23, revealed there were multiple concerns regarding food temperatures and hot food items delivered cold. On 06/26/23, the notes revealed the food was being sent out cold and on 08/01/23, the residents requested better food options, a request for fried chicken, and more salads. Observation on 08/23/23 of the tray line for the lunch meal from 12:25 P.M. to 12:50 P.M., revealed Dietary [NAME] (DC) #254 served one grilled cheese, broccoli, and cauliflower medley, coleslaw, and an oatmeal cookie. DC #254 stated he was unable to take the temperatures of the food items for the lunch meal because he does not have a working food thermometer. Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, public health department inspector interview and staff interview, the facility failed to prepare and store food to prevent food born illness and maintain a clean and sanitary kitchen area. This had the potential to affect 72 of 72 residents who receive meals from the facility. The facility census was 72. Findings include: Observations on 08/23/23 from 10:00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M., during tour of the kitchen, with Dietary Aide (DA) #250 and DA #251, revealed the standing refrigerator (refrigerator #01) contained a large clear container with an unknown type of meat salad (i.e., chicken, tuna) with no label or date. DA #250 confirmed the large container of unknown meat salad was not labeled or dated. Review of the second refrigerator (refrigerator #02) revealed a thermometer on the outside of the refrigerator reading over 60 degrees Fahrenheit and did not contain a second thermometer on the outside of the refrigerator. DA #250 stated the public health advised the facility to throw out all the milk because the refrigerator #02 was not working on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$193,839 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 3 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $6,500 — penalty dated 2024-08-14
  • $128,726 — penalty dated 2024-03-04
  • $15,887 — penalty dated 2024-01-03
  • $42,726 — penalty dated 2023-08-22
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-11 for 91 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-04-06 for 66 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-14 for 50 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Investor-owned

CMS ownership filings flag an owner of this facility as an investment firm. That’s a fact worth knowing about who ultimately profits from the home. Read the inspection and staffing record above on its own merits.

  • AAA EMINENT LLC — investment firm · 100.00% share · Indirect Ownership Interest
  • AAA HOLDCO LLC — investment firm · 100.00% share · Indirect Ownership Interest
  • AAA OPCO LLC — investment firm · 100.00% share · Direct Ownership Interest

Source: CMS SNF ownership filings (PECOS). These flags are self-reported and undercount — federal auditors (GAO) and researchers find CMS captures only a fraction of true private-equity and REIT ties, so the absence of a flag on other homes is not proof they lack investor owners. How investor ownership affects care →

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
AAA OPCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2024
AAA EMINENT LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2024
AAA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2024
AUSCH, CHAIMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/31/2024
GELDZAHLER, YAAKOVIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/31/2024
S & T BANKOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 03/06/2018
ZSEREBROWSKI, YECHEZKELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/31/2024
EMINENT CARE GROUP LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
ALLEN, CRYSTALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/31/2024
BERNER, SUSANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
SMITH, JAZMAINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
ARMSTEAD PHARMACY PROVIDER SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
CARERITE SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
DJ HOSPITALITY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2014
HOSPITALITY MN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 02/06/2014
HOSPITALITY REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/11/2017
HOWARD WERSHBALE & CO.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
MED-NET COMPLIANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024
MCCONNAHA, TAMERAIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-22.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$688K
Related-party expense9% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 2%Other / private 21%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $688K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$304per resident / day
operating cost
$9,253per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$249per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365022. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next