No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Briarfield Manor

461 South Canfield Niles Road, Youngstown, OH 44515 · For profit - Corporation · 91 certified beds · (330) 270-3468 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (330) 270-3468 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Jul 2019Resident-funds citations (F0568, F0569)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
5501 Mahoning Ave · (330) 792-4785 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5220 Mahoning Ave · (330) 793-2994 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6000 Kirk Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
242 S Canfield Niles Rd · (330) 799-4214

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.5%5.3%15.4%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.1%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.2%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.1%0.4%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.7%30.1%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.6%6.1%16.1%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication4.2%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.2%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.3%21.4%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.0%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.8%1.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.2%75.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.2%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit2.5%12.9%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
17.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.45U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 17.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.4%CMS range 37.1–56.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.6%CMS range 7.5–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge17.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge24.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.9%CMS range 5.0–12.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.44
RN hours/ resident / day
1.00
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.27
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
46.6%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 73.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.85 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-05)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2022-06-23)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-03-05 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, individualized and effective pain management program for Resident #273 and Resident #66. This affected two residents (#273 and #66) of two residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 67. Actual harm occurred beginning on 02/20/25 when the facility failed to ensure narcotic (pain) medication (that Resident #273 had been receiving prior to admission) was ordered and provided at the time of and timely following admission to manage the resident's pain. On 02/21/25 and 02/22/25 the resident reported constant pain, all over that limited his functional abilities during therapy evaluations. On 02/23/25 the resident refused therapy due to pain and was teary-eyed. On 02/24/25 at 10:01 A.M., Resident #273 stated he was in constant pain all over. The resident was tearful and covered his face with his hands and was lying in bed with his knees bent and stated he couldn't straighten…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not consistently ensure narcotic medication was properly reconciled. This had the potential to affect 17 residents (Residents #1, #11, #17, #23, #27, #30, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #51, #54, #58, #60, #69 and #75) of 17 residents who receive narcotic medications from the facility including . The facility census was 78.Findings include:Review of Station #1's narcotic Controlled Substance Count Sheet form from 02/01/26 to 03/20/26 revealed a second nursing signature was not on the form for the date of 02/09/26.Review of Station #2's narcotic Controlled Substance Count Sheet form from 02/01/26 to 03/20/26 revealed a second nursing signature was not on the form for the dates of 02/11/26, 02/17/26 and 02/21/26.Review of Station #4's narcotic Controlled Substance Count Sheet form from 02/01/26 to 03/20/26 revealed a second nursing signature was not on the form for the dates of 02/05/26, 02/09/26 and 03/06/26.Interview on 03/20/26 at 1:10 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed the above findings.Review of the undated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #81 was free from significant medication error. This affected one resident (Resident #81) of five resident records reviewed for medication administration. The facility census was 78.Findings include:Review of Resident #81's medical revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/30/26 with diagnoses including small b-cell lymphoma unspecified site, difficulty in walking, need for assistance with personal care and cardiomegaly.Review of Resident #81's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition.Review of Resident #81's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/07/26 (discontinued 01/13/26) for Ibrutinib (a targeted cancer medication to treat lymphoma) oral capsule 140 mg give three tablets by mouth at bedtime; an order dated 01/15/26 for Ibrutinib oral capsule 140 mg give three tablets by mouth at bedtime (hold from 01/17/26 to 01/24/26) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of personnel records and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the integrity and security of controlled substances and failed to maintain accurate narcotic destruction records as required, when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #694 forged LPN #677's signature on a controlled drug record for Residents #483. This affected one resident (#483) of three residents reviewed for controlled medications. The facility census was 68.Findings include:Review of Resident #483's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/26/25 with diagnoses including fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, aftercare following joint replacement surgery, presence of right artificial hip joint, malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of colon, malignant neoplasm of pancreas, unspecified, type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic autonomic (poly)neuropathy, essential (primary) hypertension, mixed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, fall investigation reviews, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure falls were thoroughly investigated for Residents #17 and #72. This affected two residents (#17 and #72) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 70. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of 03/07/25. Diagnoses included history of falling, protein calorie malnutrition, hypertension, high cholesterol, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), glaucoma, delirium, muscle weakness and hearing loss. Review of the fall risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was at moderate risk for falls. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #17 was severely cognitively impaired. She required supervision for eating, partial to moderate assistance for oral hygiene and showering and was dependent on staff for toileting and dressing. She was frequently incontinent of urine,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility menu spreadsheets and facility policy, the facility failed to follow the menu for dinner on 02/25/25 for all residents on a regular texture and mechanical soft diet. This affected all residents receiving meals from the kitchen excluding 11 residents (#10, #11, #13, #21, #28, #40, #43, #57, #59, #61, and #225) the facility identified as receiving a pureed diet, one resident (#52) who received nothing by mouth (NPO) and Resident #22 who the facility identified as having a special preference noted to receive bread and margarine at the dinner meal. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the facility spreadsheet for Tuesday week three dinner (02/25/25) revealed residents on a regular texture or a mechanical soft diet were to receive one number six scoop (five and one third ounces) of cheese tortellini with marinara sauce, one four ounce spoodle (a type of serving utensil which was a combination between a spoon and a ladle) of steamed Brussel sprouts, one slice of bread with one teaspoon of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding and intravenous (IV) poles were clean and sanitary. This affected five residents (#13, #43, #52, #57 and #226) of five residents observed for tube feeding and IV poles. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #13's medical records revealed an admission date of 04/18/24. Diagnoses included gastrostomy (feeding tube), dysphasia (difficulty swallowing) and malnutrition. Review of the care plan dated 12/24/24 revealed Resident #13 required enteral feeding (nutrition received through a feeding tube). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 had no cognition score due to resident was rarely understood. Review of the physician orders for February 2025 revealed Resident #13 received enteral feedings from 5:00 P.M. to 5:00 A.M. daily. Observation on 02/24/25 at 9:38 A.M. revealed Resident #13 was sleeping in bed with a tube feeding pole positioned at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, record review, review of the facility Fall and Winter menus, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure there was a nutritionally equivalent alternate for residents who disliked Brussel sprouts. This affected nine residents (#2, #8, #15, #32, #45, #59, #272, #276, and #278) the facility identified as having a dislike of Brussel Sprouts out of 66 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#52) as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the facility spreadsheet for Tuesday week three dinner (02/25/25) revealed residents on a regular and mechanical soft diet were to receive one number six scoop (five and one third ounces) of cheese tortellini with marinara sauce, one four ounce spoodle (a type of serving utensil which was a combination between a spoon and a ladle) of steamed Brussel sprouts, one slice of bread with one teaspoon of margarine, and one two-inch by two-inch piece of chocolate cream cake. Observations on 02/25/25 from 3:45 P.M. to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to notify Resident #32's representative of a new skin impairment. This affected one resident (#32) of three residents reviewed for changes in condition. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #32's medical records revealed an admission date of 06/19/23. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's, dementia and muscle weakness. Review of the care plan dated 12/24/24 revealed Resident #32 had self-care deficits. Interventions included assisting Resident #32 with transfers, toileting and bed mobility. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 had impaired cognition. Review of progress note dated 02/21/25 timed 6:52 P.M. authored by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #497 that stated during transfer to the toilet, Resident #32 had difficulty standing, and had fallen back into the wheelchair and received a skin tear to her right wrist. The skin tear was cleansed with normal saline and a foam…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident's #52 and #66's care planned interventions for grooming were implemented. This affected two residents ( #52 and #66) of three residents reviewed for grooming. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #66's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/24/24 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis) and hemiparesis (weakness) following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, aphasia (language disorder that affects the ability to communicate effectively) following cerebral infarction, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dysarthria (slurred speech) following cerebral infarction, and vascular dementia. Review of the care plan dated 01/08/25 included Resident #66 had a self-care deficit regarding activities of daily living (ADL) and mobility. Resident #66's dignity would be maintained. Resident #66 would be well-groomed, clean and neat through the next assessment. Interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure treatments were administered according to physician orders for Residents #40 and #58. This affected two residents (#40 and #58) of three residents reviewed for physician orders. The facility failed to adequately document abnormal vital signs for Resident #57 exhibiting a change in condition resulting in hospitalization. This affected one resident (#57) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #40's medical records revealed an admission date of 04/26/24. Diagnoses included chronic heart failure (CHF), hypertension and muscle weakness. Review of the care plan dated 01/09/25 revealed Resident #40 was at risk for edema. Interventions included Tubi grips (a tubular bandage that provides compression and support for arms and legs) per physician order. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided in a timely manner for Resident #67. This affected one resident (#67) of two residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, other fracture of head and neck of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, difficulty in walking. Review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 12/30/24 revealed Resident #67 scored 14 out of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #67 was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The care plan dated 01/12/25 stated resident was on a scheduled toileting program and the goal was that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to accurately and consistently monitor and record a physician ordered fluid restriction for Resident #58 and #29. This affected two residents (#29 and #58) out of nine residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 67. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #58 revealed an admission date of 12/15/23 with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure (CHF), atherosclerotic heart disease, and hyperlipidemia. Review of the modification of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 12/13/24, revealed Resident #58 was cognitively intact, received a therapeutic diet, had no significant weight changes, and had received a diuretic during the assessment reference period. Review of the care plan, created on 08/02/24, revealed Resident #58 was at risk for nutritional issues secondary to impaired medical status. Interventions included: provide medical nutrition therapy interventions per order and monitor, document, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, review of the long term care facility compliance agreement, and review of communication sheets from dialysis, the facility failed to ensure communication between the facility and the dialysis center was being received after every dialysis treatment as required for Resident #31. This affected one resident (#31) out of one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility identified Resident #31 as the only resident receiving dialysis. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an admission date of 07/09/20. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), dependence on renal dialysis, anemia in chronic kidney disease, and renovascular hypertension (a condition in which high blood pressure is caused by the kidneys' hormonal response to the narrowing of arteries in the kidneys). Review of Resident #31's physician orders revealed an order dated 10/24/24 for dialysis Monday,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure infection control logs were accurate and appropriate isolation precautions were in place for Resident #57. This affected one resident (#57) of three residents reviewed for infection control. The facility census was 67. Findings include: Review of Resident #57's medical records revealed an admission date of 07/29/23. Diagnosis included Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (bacterial infection). Review of the care plan dated 12/24/24 (revised 02/25/25) revealed Resident #57 had received intravenous (IV) therapy related to an acute infection. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 had impaired cognition. Resident #57 was dependent on staff for toileting and required maximum assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the physician orders for February 2025 revealed Resident #57…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to maintain sufficient levels of staff to meet the total care needs of all residents. This affected three residents (#10, #17 and #46) and had the potential to affect all 65 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 08/10/21 with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, incomplete paraplegia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/13/22 revealed Resident #46 was cognitively intact and required two person assistance for bathing. Review of Resident #46's shower records from April 2022 through 06/15/22 revealed showers were scheduled every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. The facility provided documentation of showers completed on 04/05/22, 04/11/22, 04/12/22, 04/18/22, 04/20/22, 04/22/22, 04/27/22, 05/02/22, 05/04/22, 05/13/22, 05/18/22, 05/20/22, 05/30/22, 06/05/22,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review, Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance and interview the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices during blood glucose monitoring and for residents in quarantine and/or isolation for COVID-19 to decrease the risk of spreading infection, including COVID-19. This affected one resident (#58) of two residents observed for blood glucose monitoring, six residents (#4, #40, #43, #12, #211 and #212) reviewed related to COVID-19 and had the potential to affect all 65 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1. During the annual survey, the facility identified Resident #12 as the only resident in isolation for COVID-19 (the resident had a positive test). Resident #4, #40, #43, #12, #211 and #212 were identified to be in quarantine related to potential exposure to Resident #12, however as of 06/13/22, none of these six residents had tested positive for COVID-19. Review of the medical record for Resident #12 revealed an admission date of 03/17/22 with diagnoses including pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure all medications were properly stored and failed to ensure insulin pens were dated when opened. This affected five residents (#19, #23, #46, #53 and #58) of eight residents reviewed for medication administration and/or involved in observations of three medication carts and one medication room. The facility census was 65. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 08/10/21 with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, incomplete paraplegia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the physician's orders for June 2022 revealed an order for the narcotic pain medication, Norco 5-325 milligrams (mg) one tablet every eight hours as needed for pain. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) revealed staff documented the resident was administered the Norco on 06/14/22 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were assisted with showers as per their preference. This affected three residents (#10, #17, #46) of 18 residents interviewed regarding choices and showers. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #46 revealed an admission date of 08/10/21 with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, incomplete paraplegia, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/13/22 revealed Resident #46 was cognitively intact and required two person assistance for bathing. Review of Resident #46's shower records from April 2022 through 06/15/22 revealed showers were scheduled every Monday, Wednesday and Friday. The facility provided documentation of showers completed on 04/05/22, 04/11/22, 04/12/22, 04/18/22, 04/20/22, 04/22/22, 04/27/22, 05/02/22, 05/04/22, 05/13/22, 05/18/22, 05/20/22, 05/30/22, 06/05/22, 06/10/22 and 06/15/22. This reflected instances of Resident #46 not receiving…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure residents were invited to participate in meetings discussing and developing their plan of care. This affected three residents (#10, #41 and #45) of 18 residents who were interviewed regarding participation in development of their plan of care. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, muscle spasms, diabetes mellitus, asthma, depression, chronic pain, and slow transit constipation. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 06/03/22 revealed Resident #10 was able to make herself understood, was able to understand others and was cognitively intact. Review of progress notes, dated 08/13/21 at 9:36 A.M., 12/17/21 at 9:51 A.M., 02/11/22 at 9:47 A.M. and 06/10/22 at 10:18 A.M. revealed plan of care meetings were held on these dates. Family were invited and did not attend. There was no documentation of resident attendance or input for the meetings. On 06/14/22 at 9:29 A.M. interview with Resident #10 revealed she was not invited to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #41 and #45, who required staff assistance with activity of daily living care received timely and adequate oral hygiene and/or nail care. This affected two residents (#41 and #45) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed diagnoses including end stage renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure (CHF), Alzheimer's disease, depression, and chronic pain. On 12/16/21 a physician order was written for oral hygiene every shift and as necessary. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/06/22 indicated Resident #41 was usually able to make herself understood and was usually able to understand others. Resident #41 was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired and no rejection of care was documented. The MDS assessment revealed Resident #41 was dependent on staff for transfers and required extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #10, who exhibited limited range of motion (ROM) received services to increase and/or maintain range of motion. This affected one resident (#10) of 25 residents reviewed and/or interviewed regarding range of motion. Findings include: Review of Resident #10's medical record revealed diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, diabetes mellitus, depression and chronic pain. A plan of care, initiated 06/15/15 revealed Resident #10 was at risk for contractures with a goal for Resident #10 to have no evidence of pain during ROM. Interventions included referring Resident #10 to physical and occupational therapy (dated 06/15/15) but was silent to other interventions to prevent contractures. Review of a restorative referral form, dated 12/11/20 revealed specific instructions for ROM and stretching to both lower extremities and assistive active ROM (AAROM - an exercise in which a manual or mechanical external force assists specific muscles and joints to move through their available excursion)/Passive ROM (gentle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, facility policy and procedure review and interview the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent. The medication error rate was calculated to be 6.25% and included two medication errors of 32 medication administration opportunities. This affected two residents (#38 and #58) of seven residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. On 06/15/22 at 6:06 A.M., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #604 was observed preparing and administering Lantus insulin to Resident #58 via an insulin pen. The pen was not primed after the needle was applied. The pen was set on 28 units for administration into the right lower quadrant of the abdomen. On 06/15/22 at 6:07 A.M. interview with LPN #604 verified she had not primed the insulin pen prior to administering the insulin. LPN #604 indicated she believed the pen only needed primed when the pen was originally opened. Review of the facility undated policy titled Insulin Flex Pen Policy revealed after attaching the needle to the flex pen, two units air shot was to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-23 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review and interview the facility failed to promptly notify the physician or nurse practitioner of laboratory results outside the clinical reference range for Resident #61. This affected one resident (#61) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #61 revealed the resident had diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder and aphasia. Review of the laboratory testing results, dated 05/11/22 revealed the resident had a critical lab, hemoglobin of 6.9 (low) (normal range 12.1 to 15.1). Review of laboratory results dated [DATE] revealed the resident's hemoglobin remained critically low at 7.6. Review of the progress note, dated 05/11/22 revealed no evidence the physician (MD) or the certified nurse practitioner (CNP) were notified of the critical lab on this date. A progress note, dated 05/16/22 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure resident medical records were complete and accurate. This affected three (#41, #45 and #62) of 21 residents whose medical records were reviewed. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #41's medical record revealed diagnoses including end stage renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure (CHF), Alzheimer's disease, depression, and chronic pain. On 12/16/21, a physician order was written for oral hygiene every shift and as necessary. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 05/06/22 indicated Resident #41 was usually able to make herself understood and was usually able to understand others. Resident #41 was assessed as moderately cognitively impaired. No rejection of care was documented. The MDS assessment revealed Resident #41 was dependent on staff for transfers and required extensive assistance from staff for personal hygiene. Review of the June 2022 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) indicated nurses documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-07-18 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of personnel files and interview, the facility failed to ensure prospective new employees were checked with the nurse aide registry to determine if they had findings of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation reported to the nurse aide registry prior to their application and hire at the facility. This had the potential to affect all 95 facility residents. Findings include: On 07/16/19 at 3:25 P.M. during review of personel files, Human Resource staff (HR) #819 said unless a prospective employee was a nursing assistant the facility did not check the nurse aide registry to ensure that applicant did not have findings of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation reported to the nurse aide registry prior to their application and hire at the facility. Review of the facility's abuse policy, revised 06/01/17, revealed as part of the screening process multiple interviews of potential employees would be conducted, employment references would be verified, and drug screening would be conducted. Background checks would be conducted on all employees and licenses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-07-18 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the facility assessment and interview, the facility failed to conduct, document, and update a comprehensive facility assessment. This had the potential to affect all 93 residents. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment indicated it was last updated on 05/28/18. The Facility Assessment indicated the average number of residents the facility could accommodate for elderly mental health was 12, for therapy services was 40, for nutritional needs was 9, and for dialysis was 4. The Facility Assessment indicated the average nursing staff scheduled on a daily basis. The Facility Assessment was silent as to provision of therapy services, dietary services, and mental health services. The Facility Assessment did not address activity needs, pharmacy services, laboratory services, or social service needs of the residents. The Facility Assessment was silent as to the use of any third party contracts. Health information technology resources were not addressed. On 07/17/19 at 11:37 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator were interviewed regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-07-18 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #28, #30, #40, #87, #106, and #317 were notified in writing the reason for the discharge to the hospital in an easily understood language, and failed to notify the ombudsman's office of the residents discharge to the hospital. This finding affected six (Residents #28, #30, #40, #87, #106, and #317) of six residents reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #30's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, major depressive disorder, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #30's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited a memory problem. Review of Resident #30's progress note dated 07/08/19 at 2:20 P.M. indicated the resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE] and all parties were aware. Interview on 07/17/19 at 12:52 P.M. with Licensed Social Worker (LSW)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to store and label medications according to accepted professional standards. This affected two (Residents #104 and #12) of four residents who received medications administered by nurses at the facility. This also had the potential to affect 27 residents who received medications held in medication storage cart #2. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS). Further review of Resident #104's medical record revealed a physician's order dated [DATE] for dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera) 240 milligrams (mg) delayed release capsule two times a day (for MS). Review of Resident #104's medication administration record (MAR) from [DATE] to [DATE] revealed Tecfidera was administered 34 times. Observation of medication cart #2 on [DATE] at 1:17 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #802,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-18 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident funds accounts and interview, the facility failed to deposit the entirety of a resident's funds into her account. This affected one (Resident #24) of six residents whose accounts were reviewed. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: During review of Resident #24's account it was noted Resident #24 received a $50.00 credit each month with the exception of two months. In February 2019 no $50.00 credit was listed. In April 2019 a $68.00 credit was posted. On 07/17/19 at 10:32 A.M., Corporate Accounts Receivable personnel #913 verified Resident #24 was not provided her $50.00 in February 2019, stating there had been a change in her liability and there was some confusion regarding her account. Resident #24 had an additional $18.00 of the $50.00 paid in April so the balance due in her account was $32.00.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-07-18 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of resident fund accounts and interview, the facility failed to notify a resident or his guardian when the amount in his account reached $200 less than the limit permitted for Medicaid recipients. This affected one (Resident #45) of six residents whose accounts were reviewed. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #45's quarterly account statements revealed a $1500 credit was posted to his trust on 03/11/19 raising his balance to $1830.02. The account remained over $1800. As of 07/15/19, the balance was $1970.11. On 07/17/19 at 9:30 A.M., Corporate Accounts Receivable personnel #913 said spend down notifications were generally sent out once a resident's balance was within $200 of a $2000 limit. Corporate Accounts Receivable personnel #913 verified Resident #45's balance had exceeded $1800 as of 03/11/19, stating $1500 was deposited from Resident #45's main account from a Medicare overage based on a request from the activity staff to purchase a chair. On 07/17/19 at 10:32 A.M., Corporate Accounts Receivable personnel #913 verified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview, the facility failed to provide comprehensive assessments related to medical diagnoses and conditions for one (Resident #157) of 29 residents whose records were reviewed for assessments. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #157's closed medical record revealed an admission date of 06/12/19. Diagnoses included a deep vein thrombosis (DVT - blood clot) of both lower extremities. A list of medications provided by the hospital revealed an order for omnicef 300 milligrams (mg) every twelve hours for seven days. A nutritional assessment dated [DATE] indicated nursing reported Resident #157 had emesis (did not indicate if was an isolated occurrence or if greater than one). Nursing and Resident #157 reported they believed the emesis was related to antibiotic use. A nursing note dated 06/15/19 at 8:40 P.M. indicated Resident #157 was sent to the emergency room after having three episodes of brown liquid emesis. A nursing note dated 8:42…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Narcotic Control Records accurately reflected the actual narcotic count following administration of resident narcotics. This affected one (Resident #39) of fourteen residents who received narcotics from medication cart #2. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: Observation of medication cart #2 with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #802 on 07/17/19 at 1:30 P.M. revealed, according to the Narcotic Control Record, Resident #39 had twenty-four norco tablets (hydrocodone 7.5 milligrams (mg) - acetaminophen 325 mg) remaining. Observation of the blister pack of norco at that time revealed twenty-three tablets remaining. LPN #802 was interviewed at the time of the findings and stated she had administered one tablet to Resident #39 at 9:00 A.M. and had not signed the Narcotic Control Record. LPN #802 signed the Narcotic Control Record for Resident #39 at the time of the interview. The DON was interviewed on 07/17/19 at 1:30 P.M. and stated the Narcotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain the appropriate infection control procedures during Resident #28's medication administration. This finding affected one (Resident #28) of five residents observed for medication administration. The facility census was 95 residents. Findings include: Observation on 07/15/19 at 10:52 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #801 of Resident #28's medication administration revealed the nurse checked for residual by injecting air into the resident's stomach using a barrel and plunger type of syringe placed into the port of Resident #28's PEG tube (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube is a flexible feeding tube placed through the abdominal wall and into the stomach allowing nutrition, fluids and/or medications to be placed directly into the stomach). RN #801 removed the plunger from the barrel and placed the plunger on the bedside table. At this point, the nurse put gloves on. The plunger rolled off of the resident's bedside table and onto the resident's bed linens. The nurse picked up the plunger from the bed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2026-03-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication refrigerators were maintained at an appropriate temperature. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 78. Findings include:Review of Station #1 Unit Temp Log Check form from 03/01/26 to 03/20/26 revealed no evidence the temperatures of the medication refrigerator were obtained on 03/05/26, 03/13/26 and 03/19/26.Review of Station #2 Unit Temp Log Check form from 03/01/26 to 03/20/26 revealed no evidence the temperatures of the medication refrigerator were obtained on 03/10/26, 03/02/26, 03/03/26, 03/04/26, 03/05/26, 03/07/26, 03/08/26, 03/09/26, 03/12/26, and 03/13/26.Review of Station #4 Unit Temp Log Check form from 03/01/26 to 03/20/26 revealed no evidence the temperature of the medication refrigerator was obtained on 03/17/26.Interview on 03/20/26 at 1:10 P.M. with the Administrator confirmed the above findings.Interview on 03/20/26 at 1:56 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the refrigerator temperature logs from 02/01/26 to 02/28/26 were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-06-23 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meeting attendance sheets and interview the facility failed to ensure the required members of the QAA committee participated in meetings to address QAA activities. This had the potential to affect all 65 residents. Findings include: Review of Quality Assurance (QA) attendance sheets for meetings held on 07/13/21, 10/19/21, 01/18/22, and 04/12/22 revealed each of the meetings were held virtually by Go-To Meeting. There was no evidence of physician participation in the meetings. On 06/14/22 at 1:15 P.M. interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified there was no physician who participated in the QAA meetings. However, she and the Administrator did discuss the meeting afterward with the medical director. On 06/14/22 at 1:20 P.M. interview with the Administrator verified a physician did not actively participate during the facility QAA meetings. The Administrator indicated because she and the DON met with the medical director to review the meeting afterward, she considered that as participation.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
REESE, DIANEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 01/01/2008
REESE, EDWARDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 01/01/2008
DIANE J. REESE FAMILY TRUST IOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
EDWARD J. REESE FAMILY TRUST IOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
FARMERS NATIONAL BANK CANFIELDOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2015
RUPEKA, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2013
EDM MANAGEMENT, INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2003
OVATION REHABILITATION SERVICES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
CHAFFIN, MARY BETHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/16/2023
COX, JENNIFERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2003
FERGUSON, KEVINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/10/2023
MACKIE, AMANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/16/2023
MCGUIRE, KRISTENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/09/2026
RICH, BRIANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2024
RIVERA, AMANDAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2020
SMITH, DEBORAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/16/2017
WHITE, JOSEPHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2008
YOUNG, KATHYRNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022
HILL, BARTH & KING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2004
MANOR FACILITY REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2003
WEM & ASSOCIATES, INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
NALLAPANENI, SUDHIRIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 46 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-22.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$637K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 18%Medicare 8%Other / private 73%

This home reported $637K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$425per resident / day
operating cost
$12,918per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$347per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365822. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next