Lincoln Knolls Health & Rehab LLC
31 Maranatha Drive, Youngstown, OH 44505 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 62 certified beds · (330) 746-5157 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569, F0570)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (78%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 6.3% | 5.3% | 15.4% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.3% | 6.2% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 0.4% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.7% | 30.1% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 5.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.6% | 6.1% | 16.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 41.4% | 25.5% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 92.5% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.6% | 3.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.8% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.6% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 37.7 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.99 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 78% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2022-02-25 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations, staff interview, review of the facility menus and spreadsheets for mechanical soft diets, review of facility policy for therapeutic diets, consistency modified diets, and tray card policy, the facility failed to ensure 10 residents on mechanically altered diets were provided food in the correct form assessed to meet their individual needs. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for Residents #6, #11, #19, #30, #31, #36, #37, #201 and #345 who were served whole, intact bone-in chicken by the dietary staff and nursing assistants. Residents #6, #27, #30 and #36 also were assessed to need their liquids thickened to nectar consistency and were served the wrong consistency liquids. The noncompliance to the mechanically altered diets placed them at risk for serious harm such as choking which could have resulted in death. The facility identified ten Residents (#6, #11, #19, #27, #30, #31, #36, #37, #201 and #345) who received mechanically altered diets. The facility census was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment for one Resident (#115) of 34 residents investigated for physical environment. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 34.Findings include:A review of Resident #115's medical record revealed an admission date of 06/15/20 and diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) diabetes mellitus type II, morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, cirrhosis of the liver, anxiety disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), chronic pain syndrome, muscle wasting, venous insufficiency, acquired absence of left foot, and alcohol abuse.A review of Resident #115's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Resident #115 required set-up and clean-up for eating and oral hygiene and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-02-23 · tag F0570 — widespreadAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to have a surety bond to cover the total amount of resident funds managed by the facility. This affected all 27 residents (#2, #3, #4, #8, #9, #11, #12, #16, #17, #18, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #31, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, and #40) who had funds managed by the facility. The facility census was 39. Findings include:Review of the facility's surety bond, signed 07/17/25, revealed they had coverage for up to $35,000. Review of the facility's resident accounts listing, dated 02/18/26, revealed the facility managed funds for Residents #2, #3, #4, #8, #9, #11, #12, #16, #17, #18, #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #31, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, and #40. The total balance of residents' accounts was equal to $83,396.36, which was $48,396.36 over the amount covered by their surety bond. Review of the surety bond limit increase notification, signed 02/18/26, revealed the facility had requested the surety bond coverage to be increased to $100,000 on 02/18/26. On 02/18/26 at 4:45 P.M., an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure all medications were stored appropriately. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 38. Findings include:Observation on 02/11/26 at 10:30 A.M. of the Medication Storage room with Registered Nurse (RN) #757 present revealed a frozen dinner in the med storage freezer, a full bottle of liquid Levothyroxine 37.5 milligram/milliliter (mg/ml) with a use by date of 12/25/25, a full bottle of liquid Vancomycin 50 mg.ml with a use by date of 11/07/25, 5 bags of Micafungin 100mg/100ml ordered on 09/26/25 with use by date of 10/23/25, and 1 bag of Cefepime 2 Grams (gm)/100 ml ordered December 2025 use by date 01/13/26. Additionally, the Biohazard fridge, temperature log not filled out since January 2025 with only eight out of 31 days filled in and the Freezer needed defrosted. All observations were verified at this time by RN #757. Observation on 02/11/26 at 11:00 A.M. of the 300 hall med cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #752 present revealed loose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store foods in a safe an sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 02/10/26 at 8:00 A.M., an observation of the kitchen revealed the following: On the cereal shelf in the main kitchen area, there was one plastic container of dry cereal with no label and no open date. Interview at the time of observation with Dietary Manager #746 verified there was no label or date on the container, verbally identified the cereal as corn flakes, and was unable to state when the corn flakes were placed into that container. In the walk-in cooler, there was one unsealed plastic bag containing sliced white cheese with no label and no open date. Interview at the time of observation with Dietary Manager #746 verified there was no label or date on the cheese and she was unable to state when the cheese had been placed in that bag. In addition, there was a large cardboard box containing multiple nutritional supplement products including health shakes and ice cream products sitting on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement appropriate infection control protocols during medication administration, wound care, and for residents with ordered isolation precautions. This affected four residents (#8, #23, #26 and #28) and had the potential to affect all 39 residents in the facility. Findings include:1. Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed and admission date of 10/21/13. Diagnosis included spondylosis with myelopathy of the cervical region, quadriplegia, spinal stenosis and an in-house acquired stage IV pressure ulcer to the right and left buttock. Review of Resident #8's right buttock wound care orders dated February 2026 revealed orders to cleanse with normal saline solution (NSS) then apply dakins moistened gauze and cover with a hydrocolloid dressing daily and as needed every night shift, and orders for the left buttock were to cleanse with NSS then apply dakins moistened gauze and cover with a hydrocolloid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, homelike environment, maintain resident showers in proper working order, and ensure cigarettes were disposed by residents properly. This had the potential to affect all 39 residents in the facility.Findings include:1. Observation on 02/10/26 at 8:47 A.M. of Resident #22's room revealed the resident's room was dirty, stains on the curtain between beds, the wall was dirty, appeared to have a tan liquid spilled on it, no sheets were on the bed, pillowcase had boost, a dietary supplement spilled on it. Resident was observed to be laying in the bed at this time. Observation on 02/10/26 at 9:05 A.M. of general environment revealed in the occupied Resident Rooms 103, 107,108,109,302 and the unoccupied resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed there were dryer sheets tucked in the top vents in the Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (P-Tac) units, a ductless commercial cooling and heating unit, which was on and blowing out heat. Interview and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-23 · tag F0569 — patternNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and review of guidance from the Ohio Department of Medicaid, the facility failed to notify Medicaid recipients when their total resources were within $200 of the maximum limit for maintaining Medicaid eligibility. This affected 15 residents (#8, #9, #11, #12, #16, #17, #18, #22, #23, #29, #31, #33, #34, #36, and #37) out of 27 residents whose funds were managed by the facility. The facility census was 39. Findings include:Review of the most recent spend down notices issued by the facility on 02/07/25 revealed Residents #11, #16, #33, #37, and #39 were all issued spend down notices on that date. No other spend down notices were provided by the facility after 02/07/25 to any resident. Review of the facility's payer source information for residents revealed 38 out of 39 residents were currently Medicaid recipients and one resident (#11) was previously a Medicaid recipient until 01/31/26 when his benefits lapsed. Review of the resident account balances, current as of 02/18/26, revealed the following: Resident #8 had a total account balance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to accommodate Resident #1's request for new motorized wheelchair. This affected one resident (#1) out of one residents reviewed for therapy services. The facility census was 38. Findings include:Record review for Resident #1 revealed admission date 06/15/20 of with diagnosis including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, major depression, muscle weakness, and localized edema. Review annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 (no cognitive impairment), functional limitations: upper extremity as no impairment, lower extremity as impairment of both sides, roll in bed as partial/moderate assistance, lying to sitting on side of bed not attempted due to medical condition or safety concerns.Review of annual therapy screen completed on 01/08/26 revealed Resident #1 stated he would like to start getting out of bed. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, sanitary environment in good repair. These finding affected two residents (Resident #26 and Resident #36) of 13 residents reviewed for environmental concerns. Findings included: 1. Observation on 02/11/26 at 9:20 A.M. of Resident # 26's room revealed a large brown water stain on the ceiling measuring approximately six feet by one and a half feet directly above the resident bed. Interview on 02/11/26 at 9:25 A.M., Resident #26 complained the brown stain was directly above his bed and might drip on him and he was worried it may collapse. Asked Resident if he wanted to move rooms or move beds in the room, since the other bed in the room was unoccupied, he said no, the staff had already asked him, and he did not want to move all his stuff but would if the stain or wetness became any worse. Resident #26 stated the brown stain had been there over a week, since the weather had been warming up a little. Interview with the Administrator on 02/11/26 at 10:20 A.M. verified the large water stain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care treatments were timely completed per physician orders. This affected one resident (Resident #8) of three residents reviewed for skin impairment. The facility census was 38.Findings include:Review of Resident #8's medical record revealed and admission date of 10/21/13. Diagnosis included spondylosis with myelopathy of the cervical region, quadriplegia, spinal stenosis and an in-house acquired stage IV pressure ulcer (the most severe form of pressure injury, involving full-thickness tissue loss with exposed fascia, muscle, tendon, or bone) to the right and left buttock.Review of Resident #8's physician wound treatment orders and Treatment Administration Records (TAR) from March 2024 through January 2026 revealed missing documentation of completion of wound care to Resident #8's right and left buttock Stage IV pressure ulcer multiple days each month until August 2025.Observation on 02/18/26 at 12:15 P.M. of the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) with assistance from Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision and implement safe smoking interventions for all residents. This affected three residents (#6, #26, and #34) out of four reviewed for smoking. The facility census was 39. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 05/09/23 with diagnoses including muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy, adjustment disorder with anxiety, and major depressive disorder. Review of the smoking care plan, revised 08/03/23, revealed Resident #6 was a smoker. Interventions included staff to inform resident of smoking policy and designated smoking times (initiated 05/10/23), staff were to keep cigarettes, lighter, and matches in a designated area (initiated 12/11/24), and resident was a supervised smoker (revised 06/30/25). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/23/26, revealed Resident #6 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the smoking evaluation dated 01/23/26 revealed Resident #6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents requiring dialysis treatments had reliable transportation to and from dialysis, maintain adequate communication with the dialysis providers, and complete pre and post dialysis assessments. This affected all three residents (#3, #11, and #20) identified by the facility as receiving dialysis treatments. The facility census was 39. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #3 revealed an admission date of 08/16/24 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and type two diabetes mellitus. Review of the dialysis care plan dated 08/18/24 revealed Resident #3 needed dialysis related to end stage renal disease. Interventions included no blood pressures to be taken on arm with fistula (revised 02/10/25), complete pre and post dialysis assessments per facility policy (revised 06/30/25), check bruit and thrill of left arm fistula every shift (revised 06/30/25),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to provide therapy services in a timely manner. This affected one resident (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for therapy services. The census was 39.Findings include:Record review for Resident #1 revealed admission date 06/15/20 of with diagnosis including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, major depression, muscle weakness, and localized edema. Review annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 (no cognitive impairment), functional limitations: upper extremity as no impairment, lower extremity as impairment of both sides, roll in bed as partial/moderate assistance, lying to sitting on side of bed not attempted due to medical condition or safety concerns.Review of annual therapy screen completed on 01/08/26 revealed Resident #1 stated he would like to start getting out of bed and therapy will be determined after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide assistance to Resident #11 to maintain the Medicaid benefits for which he was eligible. This affected one resident (#11) out of two reviewed for Medicaid coverage. The facility census was 39. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 10/29/19 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, type two diabetes mellitus, cerebral infarction, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, and congestive heart failure. Review of the payer source information for Resident #11 revealed the primary payer was listed as Medicaid. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/04/25, revealed Resident #11 had no cognitive impairment. Review of the progress note dated 01/12/26 at 10:18 A.M. revealed Resident #11's transportation to dialysis was cancelled and dialysis treatment was missed as a result. Review of the Medicaid Benefits and Assignment Plan for Resident #11 revealed his Medicaid benefits ended on 01/31/26. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NON-COMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY.Based on record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer via mechanical lift (Hoyer) for Resident #45. This affected one (Resident #45) of three residents reviewed for falls/Hoyer transfers. The facility census was 44.Findings include:Review of the closed medical record for Resident #45 revealed an admission date of 12/07/22 with diagnoses including type two diabetes, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, failure to thrive, morbid obesity, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). Review of the physician's order dated 01/15/25 revealed an order for a Hoyer lift for transfers. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #45 was cognitively intact, was dependent on others for mobility and required extensive assistance/dependence with activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain an outside sidewalk to allow for safe passage of residents. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 49. Findings include: Interview on 07/08/24 at 8:55 A.M. with Residents #24, #27, and #32 while they were out on the patio smoking confirmed they get their wheelchairs stuck in the large cracks in the sidewalks all the time. They also confirmed that the large divots on the sides of the sidewalk had wheelchair marks from where they rolled off the sidewalk and got stuck. Observation during the interview revealed the sidewalk to the smoking area had four cracks in sidewalks measuring six inches wide and two to three inches deep. There were numerous divots on the grass area next to the sidewalks measuring four to twelve inches deep with wheelchair marks where they got stuck. Interview and observation on 07/08/24 at 2:00 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the large cracks in the sidewalk leading to the smoking patio. He also confirmed the areas next to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, 2019 Food Code - Chapter 3717-1-03 Reference Guide review, and facility policy review the facility did not ensure food was served at a palatable temperature. This had the potential to affect 44 residents who received food from nutrition services. The facility identified one resident (#35) that received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Observation was conducted on 03/20/24 at 11:28 A.M. of the tray line temperatures at meal service. The food temperatures were taken with a calibrated digital thermometer as follows: beef pepper patty 169.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F), mashed potatoes 168 degrees F, roasted zucchini 184 degrees F, milk 39 degrees F. The tray line's start time was11:30 A.M. The system being used to retain hot food temperatures was a plate warmer and thermal dome cover. The test tray was placed on the 100/200 hall cart at 12:05 P.M. where staff would pass on the 100 unit then the 200 unit. At 12:11 P.M. a test tray was passed to Dietary Manager #725 who proceeded to take the food temperature with the same digital thermometer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a sanitary manner. This had the potential to affect 44 residents receiving meals from the kitchen. The facility identified one resident (#35) who received nothing by mouth. The census was 45. Findings include: Observation on 03/18/24 at 6:53 P.M. the kitchen dry storage revealed two open undated Potato Pearls containers with no use by date. These findings were verified by the Dietary Manager (DM) #725 at the time of the observation. Observation on 03/20/24 at 1:00 P.M. revealed the resident's refrigerator on the 200-unit had a white plastic bag with three take out containers. The plastic bag did not have a resident name or date. A paper bag with an employee's name on it with perishable food inside the bag was undated, and a gallon of ice cream in the freezer with no resident name or date. This was verified by DM #725 at the time of the observation. Interview with the Administrator on 03/20/23 at 1:12 P.M. revealed the unit-200 refrigerator should not have any food in it.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure all medication carts in the facility were maintained to secure all drugs in their proper packaging. This had potential to affect all 38 residents residing in the facility who received medications from three of three medication carts. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Observation of medication carts completed on 03/20/24 at 2:30 P.M. revealed there were a total of 11 loose medications observed. There were five loose medications observed in the 100-hall medication cart, as well as five loose medications observed in the 300-hall medication cart, and one loose medication observed in the 400-hall medication cart. The facility had a total of four medication carts. Interview on 03/20/24 at 2:45 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #724 revealed she confirmed there were five loose medications observed in the 100-hall medication cart, as well as five loose medications observed in the 300-hall medication cart. Interview on 03/20/24 at 3:00 P.M. with LPN #721 revealed she confirmed there was one loose medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care and treatment according to physician orders. This affected one resident (#36) of one resident reviewed for insulin and two residents (#31 and #35) of two residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 45. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including colitis, hemiplegia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, acute kidney injury, type two diabetes, muscle wasting, anxiety. and peripheral vascular disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #36 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #36 needed extensive assistance for bed mobility and transfers. Supervision was required while eating. Review of the plan of care dated 02/06/24 revealed Resident #36 was noncompliant with wound care as ordered. Interventions included resident education in regard to wound care and treatment, risk of noncompliance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing services were accurately documented in the medical record. This affected one resident (#37) of one resident reviewed for mobility. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #37 revealed an admission date of 06/14/23 with diagnoses including injury to the cervical spinal cord, paralytic syndrome, chronic pain syndrome, polyneuropathy, and paraplegia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #37 was cognitively intact. Review of the care plan dated 02/29/24 revealed Resident #37 had a risk for limited mobility related to decreased range of motion, pain, weakness, and paraplegia. Intervention included therapy as ordered. Review of the physician orders dated 09/01/23 indicated an order for splinting for contractures of the hands: patient to wear left hand splint on in evening and off during the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene and glove use were followed during wound care for Resident #35. This affected one resident (#35) of two residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 45. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #35 revealed an admission date of 08/21/23. Medical diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, multiple sclerosis, type two diabetes mellitus, unspecified sever protein calorie malnutrition, peripheral vascular disease, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, and contracture of right and left hand. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 was severely cognitively impaired, utilized an indwelling urinary catheter and was frequently incontinent of bowel. Resident #35 had one unhealed stage four pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and a safe environment to prevent elopement for Resident #1. This affected one (#1) of three residents reviewed for elopement. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #1 revealed an admission date of 01/05/23 with diagnoses including Huntington's disease, encephalopathy, dysphagia, acute respiratory failure, major depressive disorder, altered mental status, alcohol use with withdrawal delirium, muscle weakness, restlessness and agitation. Review of the elopement risk screen, dated 07/05/23, revealed Resident #1 was not at risk for elopement. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 07/15/23, revealed Resident #1 had a severe cognitive impairment. He displayed no wandering behaviors during the seven day look back period. He was independent for transfers and required supervision for walking and locomotion. Review of the psychiatric note dated 05/16/23 revealed Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — widespreadProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to serve meals in a timely manner affecting 47 residents receiving meals from the kitchen except for one (Resident #7) who did not eat by mouth. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Record review was conducted of the facility document titled Meal Times, undated, which was hanging in the main dining room, kitchen and given to the surveyor by Dietary Manager (DM) #508 as the current meal times. The document indicated breakfast service was 8:10 A.M. in the main dining room, 8:20 A.M. to the 300/400 units and 8:30 A.M. to the 100/200 units. Lunch service was 12:10 P.M. in the main dining room, 12:20 P.M. to the 300/400 units, and 12:30 P.M. to the 100/200 units. Dinner service was 4:10 P.M. in the main dining room, 4:20 P.M. to the 300/400 units and 4:30 P.M. to the 100/200 units. Record review of the of the facility document titled Concern Log for the months of September 2021 and October 2021 revealed there had been concerns expressed with breakfast being served late to the residents. Observation was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and policy review the failed to ensure the disposal of expired medication and supplements. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Observation of the medication room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #403, on [DATE] at 1:00 P.M. revealed four boxes of iron supplements with an imprinted use by date of 01/22; one box of Reagent Urinalysis Strips with an expiration date of [DATE] and one bottle of Cherry Sore Throat Spray with an expiration date of 11/21. Interview with LPN #403 at the time of the observation verified the medication was expired and should have been thrown away. Review of the facility's policy Storage of Medication, dated [DATE], indicated the facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, expired, or deteriorated medications/nutritional supplements. All such medications shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. Nutritional supplements will be discarded. Nurses shall check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-02-25 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility did not ensure the Dietary Manager had the appropriate competencies and skill set to effectively run the dietary department to meet the needs of all residents residing in the facility. This had the potential to affect 47 residents receiving meals from the kitchen except for one (Resident #7) who did not eat by mouth. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Record review was conducted of the personnel file for Dietary Manager (DM) #508 whose date of hire was listed as 01/20/22. There was no evidence DM #508 was a certified dietary manager or held an associate degree or higher degree in food service management or hospitality management. Observation was conducted on 02/14/22 at 6:54 A.M. of cases of raisin bread and juice cups sitting directly on the floor near the walk-in cooler. DM #508 revealed the cases were delivered on 02/11/22 and she had not yet been able to put the foods away. When asked if those foods were highly perishable, she said she was not 100 percent sure if they needed to be thrown away or not.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-02-25 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility did not ensure the dietary staff could demonstrate competency in all aspects of food production, service, and kitchen sanitation. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen except for one (Resident #7) who did not eat by mouth. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Record review was conducted of the personnel files for Dietary Manager (DM) #508, [NAME] #507, [NAME] #512, [NAME] #516 and Dietary Aide (DA) #511, DA #513 and DA #517. There was no evidence the employees had initial or annual competency checks related to their job specific duties in kitchen. Observation was conducted on 02/14/22 at 6:54 A.M. of the general kitchen environment. [NAME] #512 was present in the kitchen and identified herself as the person in charge until the dietary manager arrived to work. When the surveyor asked her to explain how she monitored the dish machine to ensure it was functioning properly, [NAME] #512 said she did not do dishes because she was the cook so the surveyor would have to ask an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, stored, and served under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the kitchen except for Resident #7 who did not eat by mouth. The census was 48. Findings include: Observation on 02/14/22 at 7:05 A.M. in the kitchen dry storage room revealed one open, undated carrot cake mix with a use by date of 11/11/21, four 16-ounce containers of medium barley with a use by 12/17/21, an open, undated five-pound bag of blueberry muffin mix with a use by date of 10/26/21, and an open undated gallon Ziploc bag with four tortilla shells. Sitting directly on the floor were two cases of 48, four-ounce 100% orange juice and one case vegetable oil. The entire perimeter of the dry storage room floor where the floor met the wall was heavily covered in crumbs and a buildup of dirt. Outside the dry storage room by the walk-in cooler sat a case of raisin bread on top two cases of 48, four-ounce juice cups. These findings were confirmed at the time of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-25 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility administration failed to ensure its resources were effectively and efficiently managed to attain and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of all 48 residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 48. Findings include: The following concerns were identified throughout the duration of the annual survey: 1. The breakfast and/or lunch meal service was running between 37 to 45 minutes late at breakfast and/or lunch on 02/14/22 and 02/15/22. On 02/15/22 at 8:51 A.M. Dietary Manager (DM) #508 informed the surveyor she had to hand write tray tickets for 47 residents (Resident #7 did not eat by mouth) since she started her job there almost a week prior because the former dietary manager had taken the computer with the tray ticket program on it. She said the Administrator was aware of it. Interview was conducted on 02/15/22 at 3:28 P.M. with the Administrator who verified she was aware the former dietary manager took the computer with her, and a replacement had not been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-25 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interviews the facility did not ensure an effective system was in place to honor resident meal choices and provide therapeutic diets as ordered by the physician. This affected seven (Resident's #10, #19, #25, #26, #33, #246 and #345) of 16 residents reviewed for food. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Record review was conducted of the four-week cycle menu titled Fall/Winter 2021-2022. The menu listed only one meal at breakfast, lunch, and dinner with no second-choice options on the menu. Resident interviews were conducted on 02/14/22 from 9:40 A.M. to 4:48 P.M. with Resident's #19, #25, #26, #33 and #246 who reported they did not get a choice in what meal was served to them and no one came around to their rooms to ask them if they wanted something besides what was on the menu. Observation on 02/15/22 at 8:51 A.M. of the breakfast tray line in the kitchen revealed [NAME] #516 verified she cooked one entree with no alternate choices. The entree she cooked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review and review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Interim Infection Prevention and Control recommendations for Healthcare Personnel (HCP), the facility failed to follow acceptable infection control practices, including the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 02/14/22 at 6:23 A.M. revealed State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #534 coming out of room [ROOM NUMBER] not wearing proper PPE (no eye protection or N95 respirator mask). STNA #534 verified she was not wearing proper PPE as she only had a surgical mask on. She stated she had been in-serviced on COVID-19 and there was an adequate supply of PPE including eye protection and N95 respirator masks. Observation on 02/14/22 at 6:24 A.M. revealed STNA #532 coming out of room [ROOM NUMBER] not wearing proper PPE (no eye protection). STNA #532 verified she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to ensure Resident's #246 and #250 were provided a dignified dining experience. This affected two (Resident's #246 and #250) of two residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #246 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and depression. Interview on 02/14/22 at 9:40 A.M. with Resident #246 revealed he was still waiting on his breakfast tray. He stated his roommate's breakfast tray had been delivered. Resident #246 stated he had asked State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #503 three times for his breakfast but had not received it. Interview with STNA #503 on 02/14/22 at 9:42 A.M. verified Resident #246's breakfast tray was not on the cart with the other trays, and she asked the kitchen for his breakfast three times and still had not received his tray. Review of facility mealtimes posted in the 100 Unit hallway revealed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-25 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the primary care physician/medical director failed to write, sign, and date progress notes at each visit. This affected three (Resident's #19, #39 and #245) of three residents reviewed for physician services as part of the extended survey. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Medical record reviews were conducted for Resident's #19, #39 and #245 and found to be without progress notes from Primary Care Physician/Medical Director (PCP/MD) #552 after 08/24/21. Interview on 02/23/22 at 10:05 A.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) verified PCP/MD #552, had the resident's progress notes from his visits with the resident. The DON verified the progress notes were not in the resident's medical record. She said this had been ongoing for a while. Interview on 02/24/22 at 9:06 A.M. with PCP/MD #552 verified he did not produce progress notes while at the facility making rounds on his residents. Instead, he would just jot a few notes down then go home and write out a dated and signed progress note. He verified he had his notes at home, and they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interviews the facility did not ensure food was served at palatable temperatures. This affected three (Resident's #10, #25 and #33) of nine residents reviewed for food. The facility census was 48. Findings include: Interview was conducted on 02/14/22 at 2:24 P.M. with Resident #25 who stated he did not want to eat the food from the facility anymore because he either did not get what he asked for or it just was not good food. Interview was conducted on 02/14/22 at 4:48 P.M. with Resident #33 who stated a lot of times the food was cold by the time it was served to her in her room. Interview was conducted on 02/15/22 at 9:40 A.M. with Resident #10 who said hot foods are not always hot by the time he gets his room tray. Observation was conducted on 02/17/22 at 12:08 P.M. of the tray line food temperatures and meal service. The food temperatures were taken with a calibrate digital thermometer as followed: BBQ chicken 169 degrees Fahrenheit (F) , sweet potato 203 degrees F, cauliflower 191 degrees F. The tray line started at 12:12 P.M. The system being used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure physician progress notes were made available in the medical record for Resident's #19, #39 and #245. This affected three of three residents reviewed as part of the extended survey. The facility census was 48. Findings include: 1. Record review was conducted for Resident #39 who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depression, chronic pain, contractures, paraplegia, anemia, and heart disease. There were no primary care physician progress notes or visits dated after 08/24/21 in the resident's medical record. Interview with the Director on Nursing (DON) on 02/23/22 at 2:12 P.M. revealed she had been having problems getting the progress notes from Primary Care Physician/Medical Director (PCP/MD) #552 because PCP/MD #552 had the notes with him instead of leaving the notes at the facility or in the medical record. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-02-25 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility did not ensure agency nursing service providers, dietary department staff competencies, a governing body representative and dietary staff representative were included in the Facility Assessment. This had the potential to affect all 48 residents living in the home. The census was 48. Findings include: Interview was conducted on 02/16/22 at 4:43 P.M. with the Director of Nursing who indicated the facility utilized a contracted nursing services staffing agency to help staff the facility. A record review was conducted of the Facility Assessment with a review and approval date of 02/22/21 revealed the contracted nursing services staffing agency was not identified within the Facility Assessment. There were also no dietary department specific annual competencies listed on the assessment. Per the signature page of who attended the meeting to approve the assessment, there was no one from the governing body or dietary department present at the approval meeting. Interview was conducted on 02/23/22 at 10:03 A.M. with the Administrator who…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $430K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365831. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.