No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Park Vista Nursing And Rehab

1216 5th Ave, Youngstown, OH 44504 · For profit - Corporation · 114 certified beds · (330) 746-2944 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (330) 746-2944 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Apr 20242 actual-harm citations$24,876 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $24,876 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (72%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
Grocery
901 Elm St · (330) 360-0648 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Wick Park0.1 mi
260 Park Ave · (330) 747-0237 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.3%5.3%15.4%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight15.3%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.2%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.4%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms60.3%30.1%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.3%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.0%6.1%16.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.4%25.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.6%94.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.7%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.4%21.4%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.4%8.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine39.7%75.6%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.8%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.6%12.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.361.731.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days5.881.801.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 73 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.62U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.24hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.6%CMS range 30.1–48.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.7%CMS range 8.4–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge52.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge32.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.4%CMS range 4.6–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.271.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.77
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.14
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.48
RN hoursweekends
72.5%
Total nursing turnover
61.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 114 beds and averages 88.5 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.14 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.21 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-19)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2022-06-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of hospital records, review of a facility investigation, review of an emergency medical service (EMS) run report, review of the time and date weather historical data, facility policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and monitoring to prevent hospitalization for hypothermia for Resident #66. In addition, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for Resident #48. This affected two residents (#66 and #48) of three reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 94. Actual Harm occurred on 12/30/25 when the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement appropriate and effective interventions to mitigate known risk for Resident #66 who was found unresponsive outdoors, after being outside for an unknown amount of time and was subsequently hospitalized and treated for hypothermia. Resident #66 had known behaviors related to staying outside for long periods of time and a prior hospitalization for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #87, who required staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADL) care, received adequate and timely incontinence care. Actual Harm occurred on 04/10/24 when Resident #87, who was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility and toileting went from 04/10/24 at approximately 6:00 A.M. to 11:52 A.M. (almost six hours) before being provided incontinence care. Resident #87 was observed to be saturated in urine resulting in a red, bleeding, open area to her right thigh that was approximately the size of a dime. Resident #87 revealed her skin was raw, hurt, and burned from the lack of timely incontinence care. She also was observed to have her incontinence brief fastened rather than being left open as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#87) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility identified 49 residents (#1, #2, #5, #8, #9, #10, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve palatable meals, and ensure meals were served in a manner that prevented possible contamination. This affected eight residents (Residents #22, #25, #28, #57, #63, #72, #73, #80 and #84) of eight reviewed for food quality, palatability and service, and had the potential to affect all 94 residents in the facility with the exception of Residents #19, #87 and #91, who did not receive meals by mouth.Findings include: Review of the medial record for Resident #22 revealed an admission date of 07/18/24. Diagnoses included difficulty walking, muscle weakness and protein calorie malnutrition.Review of the medial record for Resident #25 revealed an admission date of 01/17/25. Diagnoses included diabetes, high cholesterol, history of stroke and depression.Review of the medial record for Resident #28 revealed an admission date of 10/02/24. Diagnoses included heart disease, high cholesterol, diabetes and history of stroke.Review of the medial record for Resident #57 revealed an admission date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered showers on a consistent basis. This affected two residents (Residents #48 and #59) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) assistance. The facility identified 75 Residents (#2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18, 19, #20, #21 #22, #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #39, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #46, #47, #48, #49, #50, #51, #52, #53, #54, #55 #56, #57, #58, #59, #60, #61, #62, #63, #65, #67, #68, #69, #70, #71, #72, #73, #74 #92, #94, #95, #96 and #97) as needing assistance with showers. The facility census was 94.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #48 revealed an admission date of 10/27/25. Diagnoses included left femur fracture, heart disease, history of falling, hypertension, kidney disease and dementia.Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to implement timely treatment for skin breakdown for Resident #59 and failed to ensure treatments were completed as ordered for Resident #90. This affected two residents (#59 and #90) of three residents reviewed for skin care. The facility census was 97.Findings include:1. A record review for Resident #59 revealed an admission date of review of the medical record for Resident #59 revealed an original admission date of 09/23/25 diagnoses included diabetes with neuropathy, hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.A review of Resident #59 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] and a quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #59 was alert, and oriented without memory impairment. Resident #59 required maximum assistance to total dependence on staff for performance of activities of daily living (ADL). Resident #59 required a total mechanical lift for transfer and a manual wheelchair.A review of the physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain infection control procedures during wound care for Resident #61. This affected one resident (#61) of three residents reviewed for wound care. The facility census was 97.Findings include:Review of Resident #61 ' s medical record revealed an admission date of 06/23/25 with diagnoses including Charcot joint (a progressive destruction of joint related to a loss of sensation from nerve damage), heart failure, diabetes, and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set 3.0 (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was cognitively intact, required moderate assistance for activities of daily living, had venous or arterial ulcers, and required the application of nonsurgical dressings. Review of a wound care note for Resident #61, dated 09/11/25, revealed Resident #61 was being seen by the Advanced Practice Nurse Practitioner for treatment to venous ulcers (chronic full-thickness skin wound…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, invoice review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher was in good working condition. The facility has served all meals since 05/09/25 on paper products with plastic silverware when the dishwasher broke. This affected 90 of 92 residents residing in the facility. Residents #8 and #88 did not receive food from the kitchen. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Observation on 06/25/25 at 4:23 P.M. of residents eating dinner in the dining room and in residents' rooms revealed they were being served on paper plates with plastic silverware. Observation of the dishwasher on 06/26/25 at 1:00 P.M. revealed it was broken and not in working order. Interview on 06/26/25 at 1:15 P.M. with Maintenance Director (MD) #801 confirmed the dishwasher had a power surge that caused it to stop functioning. He reported the delay in getting it fixed was ordering parts and scheduling of the maintenance service. Interview on 06/26/25 at 1:18 P.M. with the Administrator revealed they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the AccuWeather forecast and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable temperature in the facility. This affected six (Residents #3, #15, #18, #55, #64, and #84) and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 92. Findings include: Review of facilities recent hospital transfers revealed Residents #3 and #18 were sent to the hospital on [DATE] due to heat exhaustion symptoms including lethargy, shortness of breath, dizziness, and weakness. 1. Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/31/25. Diagnoses included adult failure to thrive, encephalopathy, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, and hypertension. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had severely impaired cognition and required set up assistance with eating and oral hygiene, supervision or touching…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for all residents. This had the potential to affect all 89 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Record review of the resident concern log dated May 2025 revealed on 05/02/25 Resident #4 had a concern about floors being sticky. On 05/15/25 there was a concern noted regarding room cleanliness by Resident #15. On 05/22/25 a concern was noted for cleanliness of the room by two residents (#90 and #91). On 05/26/25 another concern for room cleanliness was logged by Resident #90. Record review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated 04/17/25 revealed a concern for housekeeping on the weekends. Record review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated 05/27/25 revealed residents requesting rooms be cleaned more thoroughly. Observations were conducted on 06/04/25 between 10:45 A.M. and 12:40 P.M. with admission Director (AD) #267 of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to store food in a manner to prevent contamination. The facility also failed to have test strips at the three-sink manual dishwash area to test for proper sanitation levels and failed to maintain clean floors in the kitchen. In addition, the facility failed to ensure refrigerator maintenance on Nursing Unit One. This had the potential to affect 99 residents receiving food from the kitchen. The facility identified two residents (#19 and #66) who received nothing by mouth. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Observation on 02/11/25 at 8:10 A.M. during the initial tour of the kitchen revealed the drawer with clean utensils at the puree food prep station was dirty. There was visible dirt and a dried green food substance in the drawer. Dietary Director (DD) #867 verified the findings at the time of the observation. There were no test strips to test for proper sanitation levels at the three-sink manual dishwash station. An interview with DD #867 at the time of the observation verified the lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, laundry work order review and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain the walk-in refrigerator, walk-in freezer and automatic dishwasher in a safe operating condition. This had the potential to affect 99 residents receiving dietary services. There were two residents (#19 and #66) identified by the facility as receiving nothing by mouth. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the laundry room, washers and dryers were maintained in clean working order. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/11/25 at 8:10 A.M. during an initial tour of the kitchen the first metal panel of the floor of the walk-in refrigerator to be coming up. There was a noticeable gap between the concrete underflooring and the metal panel. The walk-in freezer had heavy ice buildup in the right upper corner of the unit. Dietary Director (DD) #867 verified the findings of the floor coming up in the refrigerator and the heavy ice buildup in the freezer at the time of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet the needs of Resident's #34, #46, #98, and #203. This affected four residents (#34, #46, #98, and #203) and had the potential to affect 41 additional residents (#2, #7, #9, #10, #12, #14, #18, #22, #28, #30, #38, #40, #41, #42, #43, #49, #53, #55, #56, #57, #61, #64, #65, #66, #68, #70, #72, #73, #75, #76, #77, #82, #83, #88, #90, #96, #102, #103, #204, #205, and #206), residing on the nursing two and rehab two nursing units. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/12/22 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and anxiety disorder. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively intact. Resident #46 required partial to moderate assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, review of the manufacturer recommendations for a glucometer and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Residents #1 and #95, with physician ordered isolation precautions, had the appropriate signage on the entrance door to the resident's rooms indicating the type of precautions and type of personal protective equipment (PPE) required when providing care. This finding affected two residents (#1 and #96) of four residents reviewed for isolation precautions and had the potential to affect an additional 35 residents (#5, #11, #12, #16, #24, #26, #30, #33, #34, #38, #40, #43, #47, #53, #55, #57, #58, #61, #63, #64, #65, #82, #83, #84, #89, #90, #94, #98, #99, #102, #203, #205, #206, #253, #256) residing on the 200 and 300 Rehab Units. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the glucometer blood glucose testing machine (BGT) was appropriately cleaned and sanitized after use on Resident #40 to prevent the potential for cross contamination of bloodborne…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Resident's #46 and #98 were transported to their scheduled appointments. This affected two residents (#46 and #98) out of three residents reviewed for transportation to appointments. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #46's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/12/22 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, and anxiety disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #46 was cognitively intact. Resident #46 required partial to moderate assistance rolling left and right, the ability to come to a standing position from sitting in a chair, wheelchair, or on the side of the bed, and the ability to transfer to and from a bed to a chair or wheelchair. Review of the care plan revised 12/20/24 included Resident #46 had an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Residents #57 and #90 and had a clean, sanitary and homelike environment. This affected two residents (#57 and #90) out of three residents reviewed for sanitary homelike environment. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #57's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/06/24 with diagnoses including bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #57 was cognitively intact. Resident #57 had no impairment of the upper and lower extremities. Resident #57 required set-up or clean-up assistance for activity of daily living (ADL). Observation on 02/12/25 at 10:21 A.M. of Resident #57 revealed she walked up to Registered Nurse (RN) #997 and was very upset and told RN #997 her room needed cleaned. Resident #57 stated her trash can was so full…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility did not ensure a baseline care plan was completed within 48 hours for Residents #11, #92, and #257. This affected three residents (#11, #92, and #257) of the 30 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #11 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of acute osteomyelitis of the right ankle and foot, legal blindness, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11's cognition was intact as evidenced by the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15 out of 15. The resident required moderate assistance for toileting, dressing, showers and transfers. Review of the care plan revealed a baseline care plan was initiated on 12/28/24. Interview on 02/18/25 at 10:24 A.M. with Unit Manager #859 confirmed a baseline care plan was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an initial care conference was completed for Resident #11 and failed to ensure the quarterly care conference was completed for Resident #31. This affected two residents (#11 and #31) of the 30 resident records reviewed. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #11 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of acute osteomyelitis of the right ankle and foot, legal blindness, chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #11's cognition was intact as evidenced by the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15 out of 15. The resident required moderate assistance for toileting, dressing, showers and transfers. Review of Resident #11's medical record revealed no documented evidence a care conference had occurred. Interview on 02/18/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #29 was provided adequate nail care. This finding affected one resident (#29) of four residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of Resident #29's medical record revealed the resident was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia affecting the right dominant side, dementia, and cerebral infarction. Review of Resident #29's current ADL care plan revealed an intervention dated 08/05/21 to check the nail length and trim and clean on bath days and as necessary. Report any changes to the nurse. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 exhibited severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for ADL care. Telephone interview on 02/11/25 at 10:02 A.M. with Resident #29's power-of-attorney (POA) revealed the POA had concerns of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #49 was provided an ongoing activities program to meet the needs of the resident. This finding affected one resident (#49) of one resident reviewed for activities. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #49 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including rheumatoid arthritis, spinal stenosis, and anxiety disorder. Review of Resident #49's current activity care plans revealed an intervention dated 11/17/23 which revealed the resident needed a variety of activity types and locations to maintain the resident's interests. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #49 had intact cognition. Review of Resident #49's activity logs from 01/07/25 to 02/12/25 revealed the resident received two one-to-one activity visits from the activity staff, including one on 01/07/25 and one on 02/11/25.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure orthotics/braces were applied as ordered for Resident #86. This affected one resident (#86) of five residents reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM) and had the potential to affect 13 residents (#5, #6, #7, #29, #31, #40, #42, #43, #64, 72, #81 and #86) identified by the facility as requiring application of orthotics/braces. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 02/15/24 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, diabetes type two, and difficulty walking. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 10/08/24 for a right ankle foot orthosis (AFO) brace when out of bed. (An AFO brace is a brace utilized for support and control the ankle and foot. An AFO is typically used to improve mobility, reduce pain, and prevent deformities). In addition, there was an order dated 11/30/24 to consult…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility incident log, interview and review of the facility post fall investigation, the facility failed to ensure Resident #47 had a comprehensive fall assessment completed after experiencing falls. This affected one resident (#47) out of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of Resident #47's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/13/24 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis or right anterior cerebral artery, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #47's Fall Risk Evaluation dated 12/16/24 revealed she was at risk for falls. Review of the care plan dated 12/16/24 revealed Resident #47 was at risk for falls and potential injury related to debilitation, weakness, impaired balance, impaired cognition. Resident #47 was at high risk for falls due to impulsivity. Resident #47 would be free from major injury through the next review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure Residents #34 and #203's incontinence care was provided timely and failed to ensure Resident #203's care planned interventions for reporting changes in skin status were implemented. This affected two residents (#34 and #203) out of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #203's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/03/25 with diagnoses including multiple fractures of the ribs, left side, displaced fracture of lateral condyle of right femur, displaced fracture of surgical neck of unspecified humerus, displaced articular fracture of head of left femur, and type II diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of Resident #203's Weekly Wound assessment dated [DATE] included the first observation of Resident #203's left hip revealed it was well approximated with 26 staples, light serosanguinous drainage and no signs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #13 was provided with the diet as ordered and failed to ensure Resident #86 was weighed weekly as ordered. This affected two residents (#13 and #86) of five residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 101. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia, unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of Resident #13's current alteration in nutrition and hydration care plans revealed an intervention dated 03/05/24 to provide the diet as ordered. Review of the Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #13 was on a regular diet, mechanical soft texture, regular/thin liquids with a nighttime snack daily and a divided plate. Review of the dietary progress note dated 02/07/25 at 8:04 P.M. revealed Resident #13 had a weight change, was on a regular diet, regular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #66's tube feeding was infusing as ordered by the physician. This affected one resident (#66) of one resident reviewed for tube feedings. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Medical record review revealed Resident #66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction due to occlusion or stenosis of unspecified cerebral artery, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, multiple sites, type II diabetes, vascular dementia, moderate without behavioral disturbance psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #66 exhibited moderate cognitive impairment, weighed 133 pounds and did not have any oral intake. Resident #66 required a feeding tube for oral intake. Review of Resident #66's weights…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #206's pain was addressed timely. This affected one resident (#206) out of three residents reviewed for pain. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of Resident #206's medical record revealed and admission date of 02/06/25 with diagnoses including encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, type II diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, acquired absence of the left leg below the knee. Review of Resident #206's physician orders dated 02/06/25 revealed oxycodone HCl oral capsule (opioid pain medication) 5 milligrams (mg), give one capsule by mouth every six hours as needed for pain for five days. The order was discontinued on 02/11/25. Review of Resident #206's physician orders dated 02/07/25 revealed acetaminophen oral tablet (Tylenol) (analgesic), give 1300 mg by mouth three times a day for pain. Review of Resident #206's physician orders dated 02/10/25 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4's thrill and bruit were assessed every shift per facility policy. This finding affected one resident (#4) of one resident reviewed for dialysis services. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of Resident #4's physician's orders revealed an order dated 06/27/24 for vital signs before and after dialysis and an order dated 06/26/24 for hemodialysis every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday with an arrival time of 10:10 A.M. There was no order to assess Resident #4's thrill and bruit. Review of Resident #4's medication administration records (MARs) and treatment administration records (TARs) from 01/01/25 to 02/13/25 did not reveal evidence the resident's bruit and thrill were assessed every shift per facility policy. Interview on 02/13/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Resident #31 was free from unnecessary medications and failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were conducted monthly for Resident #14. This affected two residents (#31 and #14) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The census was 101. Findings include: 1. Record review revealed Resident #31 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebral infarction, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of the Vital Signs and Pain Only Evaluation dated 01/22/25 revealed Resident #31's pain was moderate. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #31's cognition was intact, and he had an impairment on one side in the upper and lower extremity. He was dependent on staff for toileting, showers, dressing, and required maximal assistance for personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed ensure Resident #86's medical record accurately reflected the status of a right lower extremity brace. This affected one resident (#86) of 33 residents who had a review of medical records. The facility census was 101. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #86 revealed an admission date of 02/15/24 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, diabetes type two, and difficulty walking. Review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 10/08/24 for a right ankle foot orthosis (AFO) brace when out of bed. (An AFO brace is a brace utilized for support and control the ankle and foot. An AFO is typically used to improve mobility, reduce pain, and prevent deformities). In addition, there was an order dated 11/30/24 to consult Western Reserve Orthotics for right AFO as the current AFO is broken. There was no documented evidence in the medical record on 11/30/24 that the facility called the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a base line care plan was completed for one resident (#99) out of three reviewed for care plans. The facility census was 96. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #99 revealed an admission date of 09/10/24 and a discharge date of 09/19/24. Diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), tracheostomy status, gastrostomy status, other seizures, peripheral vascular disease, gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) without esophagitis. Review of the Medicare five-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 09/12/24, revealed it was still in progress. Review of the facility assessment titled N Adv-Clinical Admission, dated 09/10/24, revealed Resident #99 was alert and oriented with some forgetfulness. She exhibited shortness of breath upon exertion, while sitting, and while laying flat. She received oxygen via her tracheostomy. Her gait was unsteady, and she had poor balance. She was bedrest all or most of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was clean and sanitary and items were properly stored and dated. This had the potential to affect all 82 residents residing in the facility. The facility identified all residents as receiving meals from the kitchen. Findings include: Observation of the kitchen on 05/14/24 from 4:12 P.M. to 4:29 P.M. with Dietary Director #407 revealed the following concerns: • The square chest freezer in the hallway outside of the dry storage area had a buildup of ice approximately three to four inches thick around the perimeter of the unit. There was a buildup of debris on the sliding doors and around the perimeter of the doors. There was no thermometer in the unit. Dietary Director #407 confirmed the areas of concern at the time of observation. • In the milk and juice walk-in cooler there were three unopened quarts of heaving whipping cream with a use by date of 05/01/24 sitting on an elevated shelf. Dietary Director #407…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed for Residents #69 and #83. This affected two residents (#69 and #83) of three residents reviewed for following physician's orders. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #83 revealed an admission date of 03/27/24 and a discharge date of 04/27/24. Medical diagnoses included hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure with stage five chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition, and end stage renal disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #83 was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #83 was dependent on staff with toileting, and lower body dressing, and required substantial to maximal assistance with oral hygiene, shower/bathing, upper body dressing, and personal hygiene. Review of the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, review of a self-reported incident (SRI), and review of the facility policy revealed the facility did not timely report an allegation of misappropriation to the state agency. This affected one resident (#88) out of one resident reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 87. Findings include: Review of the closed medical record for Resident #88 revealed an admission date of 12/19/23. Resident #88 was discharged to the assisted living on 04/04/24. Diagnoses included hypotension, cerebral palsy, anxiety disorder, and chronic pain. Review of the witness statement dated 03/29/24 and completed by Resident #88 revealed she had an envelope of four hundred dollars that was missing from her purse in her drawer. The witness statement stated that she checked the money at least two times daily and more if needed. She had signed and dated the witness statement for 03/29/24. Review of the witness statement dated 03/29/24 at 6:30 P.M. and completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #552 revealed LPN #552 was getting ready to go into another room when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure a thorough post-fall investigation was completed to identify hazards, and evaluate and analyze hazards and risks to prevent falls for Resident #89. This affected one resident (#89) of four residents reviewed for accidents/hazards. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 02/20/24 to another nursing facility. Medical Diagnoses included multiple myeloma, anemia due to chemotherapy, type two diabetes, chronic kidney disease , diabetic cataract, lack of coordination, and muscle atrophy. Review of the Minimum Data Set ( MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #89 required moderate assistance to roll in bed, sit to lie flat on the bed, lie to sit on side of bed, sit to stand, chair to bed transfer and toilet transfer. Resident #89 did not attempt to walk ten feet nor attempt to pick…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #32 was treated in a dignified manner that included providing privacy during incontinence care. This affected one resident (#32) of three residents reviewed for incontinence care. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of medical record for Resident #32 revealed an admission date of 04/17/23 with medical diagnoses including hypertension, cognitive communication deficit, diverticulosis of intestine, need for assistance with personal care. Review of annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #32 was dependent on toileting and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of the care plan dated 04/17/23 revealed Resident #32 had mixed bladder incontinence related to impaired right shoulder fusion and diuretic use. Interventions included to clean peri-area with each incontinence episode. Observation of incontinence care for Resident #32 completed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to provide nail care to Resident #55. This affected one resident (#55) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility census was 86. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #55 revealed an admission date of 07/06/23 with medical diagnoses including unspecified injury of head, Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, type two diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the care plan dated 07/06/23 revealed Resident #55 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to confusion and impaired balance. Interventions included checking nail length and trimming and cleaning nails on bath day and as necessary. Resident #55 required partial moderate assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #55 revealed the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure routine, ongoing, and systematic collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination of surveillance data to identify infections to maintain or improve resident health status was completed timely. This finding had the potential to affect all 97 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the infection control surveillance tracking system from 01/01/23 to 09/28/23 revealed no evidence the appropriate infection control surveillance including monitoring, evaluating, reporting, and responding to infections was conducted for 06/23, 07/23, and 08/23. Interview on 09/28/23 at 12:50 P.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) #881 revealed she was the infection preventionist of the facility and it was her responsibility to tracking infections and conduct the appropriate infection surveillance. She indicated she was unable to complete the tracking for 06/23, 07/23, and 08/23 due to nursing staff call-offs which required her to work on the floor as a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. This affected Nursing Unit One and its 24 residents (#3, #4, #8, #9, #11, #13, #14, #17, #23, #24, #32, #39, #40, #44, #48, #49, #52, #60, #70, #72, #85, #92, #94, and #96) and had the potential to affect all 97 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Interview on 09/22/23 at 3:40 P.M. with Ombudsman #818 revealed her concern regarding the cleanliness and sanitariness of the nursing units. Observations on 09/25/23 from 9:15 A.M. to 10:30 A.M. revealed plastic wrap debris, coffee cups, and general dirty floors in Nursing Unit One. Nursing Unit Two and Rehab Unit Two were clean, sanitary, and free from dirt and debris. Interviews on 09/25/23 from 9:15 A.M. to 10:30 A.M. with Residents #85, #49, and #11 indicated the housekeepers could use some help. Interview on 09/25/23 at 4:00 P.M. with the Administrator revealed she was aware of the concerns with the cleanliness and was actively working on hiring housekeepers. This deficiency represents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to timely follow-up on Resident #99's family concern regarding missing items. This finding affected one resident (#99) of three residents reviewed for grievances. Findings include: Review of Resident #99's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 08/18/23 with diagnoses including vascular dementia, chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, and diabetes. Review of Resident #99's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #99's Missing/Lost Item Replacement Documentation form dated 08/18/23 indicated a standard black wheelchair was missing and dentures were missing with the family to obtain a new set. The form stated on 09/22/23 the daughter was coming to the facility on [DATE] to pick up a wheelchair. The form also indicated on 09/27/23 the family had reported additional missing items…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Residents #51 and #94's pressure ulcer wound care was completed as ordered. This finding affected two residents (#51 and #94) of three residents investigated for pressure ulcers. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic diastolic congestive heart failure, essential hypertension, and difficulty in walking. Review of Resident #51's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #51's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/24/23 to cleanse the coccyx wound with normal saline, apply triad cream (sterile coating that can be used on broken skin) to the wound and cover with a dry dressing daily and as needed. Review of Resident #51's Weekly Observation Tool dated 09/14/23 revealed the resident had a stage three pressure wound (wound that had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on video surveillance, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure resident safety was maintained during the use of Hoyer mechanical lifts and failed to ensure Hoyer mechanical lifts were in good working order. This finding affected three residents (#38, #46 and #55) of four residents investigated for Hoyer Mechanical Lifts. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed the resident was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hemiplegia, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #38's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited a memory problem and required extensive two person assist for bed mobility and personal hygiene as well as total dependence two person assist for transfers. Review of Resident #38's Assistance with Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan indicated an intervention on [DATE] revealed the resident was totally dependent on two staff members with a mechanical lift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure Resident #51 was provided education for using three incontinence briefs on the resident at one time. This finding affected one resident (#51) of three residents investigated for incontinence care. Findings include: Review of Resident #51's medical record revealed an admission date of 08/17/22 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, diabetes, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #51's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition, required extensive two person assist for toileting and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Interview on 09/25/23 at 6:49 A.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #806 indicated she provided Resident #51 incontinence care around 5:30 A.M. to Resident #51. She stated there was not enough staff to provide timely care. Observation on 09/25/23 at 9:10 A.M. of Resident #51's incontinence care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were documented on Resident #98's medication administration records (MARS). This finding affected one resident (#98) of seven resident records reviewed for accuracy. Findings include: Review of Resident #98's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], discharged to the hospital on [DATE], returned to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses including encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the genitourinary system, carcinoma in situ of bladder, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #98's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #98's physician orders revealed an order dated 08/29/23 and discontinued 08/31/23 for magnesium hydroxide oral suspension 400 milligrams (mg)/5 milliliters (ml) give 30 ml by mouth as needed for constipation and an order dated 08/10/23 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #42 was turned and repositioned. This affected one resident (#42) of three residents reviewed for turning and repositioning. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 03/29/21. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, communication deficit, and malnutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was rarely or never understood. She was totally dependent on two people for transfers and required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility. Review of the physician's orders for August 2023 revealed an order for staff to turn and reposition Resident #42 every two hours. Observation on 08/29/23 at 8:40 A.M. of Resident #42 revealed she was lying in bed on her back with the head of the bed elevated approximately 45 degrees. Interview on 08/29/23 at 8:40 A.M. with Resident #42's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure palm protectors were in use for Resident #42 as ordered. This affected one resident (#42) of three reviewed for skin breakdown. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #42 revealed an admission date of 03/29/21. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, hypertension, communication deficit, and malnutrition. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #42 was rarely or never understood. She was totally dependent on two people for transfers and toilet use, was totally dependent on one person for hygiene, required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility, and extensive assistance of one person for dressing and eating. Review of the physician's orders for August 2023 revealed an order for palm protectors at all times except for bathing and hygiene. Review of the care plan dated 06/21/23 revealed Resident #42 had an alteration in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure an accurate medical record for Resident #34. This affected one resident (#34) of three residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #34 revealed an admission date of 02/13/23. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction, depression, glaucoma, and breast cancer. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #34 was rarely or never understood. She was totally dependent on two people for transfers, required extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and toilet use, and extensive assistance of one person for dressing, eating, and hygiene. Review of the physician's orders for August 2023 revealed an order for enteral feed (a method of supplying nutrients directly into the gastrointestinal tract) of Isosource 1.5 at 45 cubic centimeters (cc) from 9:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M. each day. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-01 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain sufficient levels of nursing staff on the Nursing One unit to meet the total care needs of all residents on the unit. This affected three residents (#44, #52 and #75) and had the potential to affect an additional 18 residents (#2, #3, #11, #17, #27, #32, #33, #34, #41, #47, #48, #57, #60, #64, #72, #83, #91 and #92) who resided on the Nursing One unit. The facility census was 93. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Review of Resident #44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she exhibited severe cognitive impairment, was always incontinent of bladder and required extensive two person assist for bed mobility and extensive two person assist for toileting. Interview on 07/31/23 at 6:30 A.M. with State Tested Nurse Aide (STNA) #803 indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). The medication error rate was calculated to be 20% and included five medication errors of 25 medication administration opportunities. This affected three residents (#49, #50 and #65) of five residents observed for medication administration. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, diabetes, and major depressive disorder. Review of Resident #65's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident exhibited intact cognition. Review of Resident #65's physician orders revealed an order dated [DATE] for aspirin chewable 81 mg (milligrams) one tablet by mouth one time a day for COVID-19 protocol, an order dated [DATE] for Ergocalciferol capsule (calcium) 1.25 mg or 50,000 iu (international units) give one capsule by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a clean and home like environment. This affected Resident #62 and all of the other 18 residents, Residents #26, #36, #55, #57, #70, #79, #80, #81, #82, #83, #84, #123, #128, #129, #130, #131, and #132, who resided on the third floor. The facility census was 82. Findings include: 1. Observation on 06/14/22 at 8:01 A.M. on the third floor revealed three bags of trash on the floor with leakage on the floor and three bags of trash sitting on top of the trash can. Interview at that time with Environmental Services (EVS) Staff #818 verified the identified findings. 2. Observation on 06/15/22 at 10:05 A.M. of Resident #62's bathroom sink revealed the water was running from the faucet and was unable to be turned off. Interview on 06/15/22 at 10:05 A.M. with Maintenance #814 verified this concern and stated he had been aware of it for a couple of weeks now.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure call lights were with in reach for all residents. This affected four residents (Residents #12, #17, #32, and #35) of 30 residents initially screened. The facility census was 82. Finding include: Interview on 06/14/22 at 3:27 P.M. with Resident #32 revealed he was not aware of where his call light was. Observation at time of interview revealed Resident #32's call light was wrapped around the bottom of his bed side railing and he was unable to reach it. At the time of this observation, Resident #32's roommate, Resident #17, as asleep in bed and his call light was observed on the floor and out of reach. Observation on 06/14/22 at 3:47 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #821 confirmed Resident #32's and Resident #17's call lights were out of reach. An additional observation with LPN #821 at that time revealed Resident #35 and Resident #12 were in their beds with their call lights on the floor and out of reach. Resident #32 and #17 were not interviewable. LPN #821 confirmed their call lights were out of reach. LPN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care to Resident #50, who was dependent on staff for toileting. This affected one of one resident observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 82. Finding include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/23/20 with diagnoses including muscle wasting, diabetes and anxiety. Review of the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 required extensive assistance from staff for toileting and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #50's brief interview for mental status revealed a score of 13, scores of 13 to 15 indicate the person is alert and oriented. Review of the care plan dated 06/10/22 revealed Resident #50 was to be checked by staff for incontinence every two hours and were to provide incontinence care as needed. Interview on 06/14/22 at 1:48 P.M. with Resident #50 revealed he had requested incontinence care at approximately 10:00 A.M.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #4 was served and assisted timely with meals. This affected one of eight residents reviewed for food and nutrition. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #4 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, dementia without behavioral disturbance and anxiety. Review of the current altered nutrition/hydration status care plan revealed an intervention dated 09/28/21 for staff to provide and serve the diet as ordered and to monitor intake and record each meal. Review of Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she exhibited severe cognitive impairment. Observation on 06/14/22 at 1:30 P.M. revealed State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #802 was in Resident #4's room with the door closed. Upon entry, STNA #802 was observed in the middle of Resident #4's room. Resident #4 was awake in bed and alert but she was not interviewable.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen tubing for Resident #29 was changed per physician order. This affected one of four residents (#18, #29, #50, and #75) who received oxygen on the first floor. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #29 revealed an admission date of 09/09/21. Diagnoses included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #29 was alert, oriented and had intact cognition. Review of the physician orders for June 2022 revealed an order initiated on 05/08/22 for staff to change the oxygen tubing for Resident #29 every Sunday night and as needed on night shift. Observation on 06/12/22 at 12:10 P.M. revealed Resident #29 in bed receiving oxygen therapy via oxygen tubing and oxygen concentrator. There was a piece…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-15 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide adequate staffing for provision of timely incontinence care to Resident #50, who was dependent on staff for toileting. This affected one of one resident observed for incontinence care. The facility census was 82. Finding include: Review of Resident #50's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/23/20 with diagnoses including muscle wasting, diabetes and anxiety. Review of the minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #50 required extensive assistance from staff for toileting and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident #50's brief interview for mental status revealed a score of 13, scores of 13 to 15 indicate the person is alert and oriented. Review of the care plan dated 06/10/22 revealed Resident #50 was to be checked by staff for incontinence every two hours and were to provide incontinence care as needed. Interview on 06/14/22 at 1:48 P.M. with Resident #50 revealed he had requested incontinence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure Resident #32 and Resident #17's call lights were functional. This affected two of four residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 82. Findings include: Interview on 06/14/22 at 3:27 P.M. with Resident #32 stated his call light had not been functioning for approximately three weeks. Observation of his call light confirmed his call light was not been functioning. Observation of his roommates call light, Resident #17, revealed his call light was also not functioning. Interview on 06/14/22 at 3:47 P.M. with Licensed Practical Nurse #821 confirmed the call lights of Resident #32 and #17 had not been functioning. Interview on 06/14/22 at 3:57 P.M. with State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) #820 revealed she was aware Resident #32 and Resident #17's call lights had not been functioning for approximately three weeks. STNA #820 stated she had informed the nursing staff, however the issue had not been fixed.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2023-08-30 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure posted nursing staff information was updated in a timely manner. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 88. Findings include: Observation of the posted nursing staff information on 08/29/23 at 7:52 A.M. revealed the posted nursing staff information was dated 08/25/23. Interview on 08/29/23 at 7:52 A.M. with Receptionist #203 confirmed the posted staffing information had not been updated since 08/25/23. Observation of the posted staffing information on 08/29/23 at 8:20 A.M. dated 08/25/23 revealed a facility census of 235. Observation of the posted staffing information on 08/29/23 at 12:44 P.M. dated 08/29/23 revealed a facility census of 235. Interview at the time of the observation with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the census listed on the posted staffing information was not accurate and she had not yet changed the information. Observation on 08/30/23 at 5:32 A.M. revealed the posted nursing staff information was dated 08/29/23 with a census of 235. This deficiency is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-06-15 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) received annual performance evaluations as required. This finding affected two of four STNAs employee files reviewed and had the potential to affect all 82 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of STNA #806's employee file revealed she was hired at the facility on 07/23/14 and her last annual performance evaluation was completed on 05/29/19. Review of STNA #807's employee file revealed she was hired at the facility on 08/29/94 and her last annual performance evaluation was completed on 05/30/19. Interview on 06/15/22 at 8:58 A.M. with Director of Human Resources #806 confirmed STNA #806 and STNA #807's performance evaluations were not completed annually as required.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-06-15 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure Residents #6, #35, #44 and #52 and/or their representatives were notified in writing of the reason for their discharge to the hospital and failed to notify the Ombudsman of Resident #44's transfer to the hospital. This finding affected four (Residents #6, #35, #44 and #52) of six resident records reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #6's medical record revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including periprosthetic fracture around the internal prosthetic right hip joint, altered mental status and major depressive disorder. Resident #6's son was listed as her first emergency contact. Review of Resident #6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she exhibited severe cognitive impairment. Review of the progress note dated 06/06/22 at 8:35 A.M. indicated the nurse was called into the room by a State Tested Nursing Assistant (STNA) and Resident #6 had vomited clear phlegm and was dry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-06-15 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide bed hold notice information to residents/resident representatives as required. This finding affected three (Residents #35, #44 and #52) of six resident records reviewed for transfers/hospitalizations. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #44's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation (irregular heart rate) and essential hypertension. Resident #44's first emergency contact was her brother. Review of Resident #44's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed she exhibited intact cognition. Review of the progress note dated 04/22/22 at 8:04 P.M. indicated Resident #44 complained of chest pain which was unrelieved with rest. A call was placed to the physician and an order was received to send Resident #44 to the emergency room for evaluation. A message was left with her brother regarding Resident #44's condition and going…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2019-06-20 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment included contracted nursing services agencies. This had the potential to affect all 95 residents currently living in the facility. Findings include: An interview was conducted on 06/20/19 at 12:11 P.M. with the Director of Nursing (DON) who revealed the facility had contracts with eight nursing services agencies and used the agency staff daily to provide resident care on all units in the facility. A record review was conducted of the contracts between the facility and the eight nursing services agencies. Agency number one through eight were contracted on 06/13/11, 11/26/14, 11/02/16, 03/17/17, 10/25/17 for two of them, 03/05/18 and 04/11/2018. A record review was conducted of the facility document titled Facility Assessment, dated 11/23/18, that indicated it was completed by the DON, Administrator, Medical Director and a Governing Body Representative. The assessment did not include the eight contracted nursing services agencies providing care to the residents in the facility. A record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-06-20 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide written transfer or discharge notices to residents and their representatives and send a copy to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for transfers to the hospital. This affected three (Residents #51, #32 and #8) of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: 1. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic kidney disease stage 4, adult failure to thrive, peptic ulcer, bradycardia and atrial fibrillation. The medical record revealed Resident #51 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE],10/18/18, 12/13/18, 03/30/19, 04/15/19, 04/29/19 and 05/07/19. She was admitted for treatment and readmitted to the facility each time. There was no evidence the facility provided written notices of the transfers to the resident or her representative on 12/13/18, 03/30/19, 04/15/19 or 05/07/19. There was no evidence the facility sent copies of the notices to the Office of the State Long-Term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-06-20 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provided written information of the facility's bed hold policy to the resident or representative upon transfer to the hospital for three residents (Resident #51, #32 and #15). This affected three of four residents reviewed for hospitalization. Findings include: 1. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including chronic kidney disease stage 4, adult failure to thrive, peptic ulcer, bradycardia and atrial fibrillation. The medical record revealed Resident #51 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE],10/18/18, 12/13/18, 03/30/19, 04/15/19, 04/29/19 and 05/07/19. She was admitted for treatment and readmitted to the facility each time. There was no evidence the facility provided written notification of the bed hold policy to the resident or her representative for transfers to the hospital on [DATE], 04/15/19 or 04/29/19. The findings were verified with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/20/19 at 12:07 P.M. 2. Resident #32…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$24,876 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $24,876 — penalty dated 2024-04-17
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-15 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
IRO PARK VISTA OPCO HOLDING GROUP LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/09/2023
CUSNER, ADAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/27/2025
DEGYANSKY, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
GOLDISH, ELIEZERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2023
KAZARNOVSKY, SOLOMONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
STEIN, ABBAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$538K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 20%Medicare 6%Other / private 74%

This home reported $538K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$356per resident / day
operating cost
$10,811per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$327per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Ohio
$9,186/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,389/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,103/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 365275. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next