Shepherd Of The Valley-Boardman

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 44.3 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.34 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to implement an effective pressure ulcer prevention program to promote healing and to ensure Resident #51, who was cognitively impaired, dependent on staff for hygiene and had functional limitation to bilateral upper extremities, received interventions to prevent skin breakdown, timely assessments to her right third and fourth finger wounds and wound care as ordered by the physician.Actual Harm occurred on 10/08/25 when Resident #51 was assessed by Nurse Practitioner (NP) #301 and found to have long nails on her right hand digging into her hand causing wounds (no size or wound type provided in documentation). On 10/09/25 Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #205 attempted to assess and cleanse Resident #51's right hand, however, the resident refused. LPN #205 stated she would again approach the resident after lunch, however, there was no evidence that Resident #51's right hand was assessed. There were no further nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility did not ensure medications were not stored expired and were stored securely in medication storage areas. This affected four of four medication carts observed and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 49.Findings include: 1. An observation on [DATE] at 10:00 A.M. of the 300 Hall medication cart revealed the following: an opened bottle of Geri-Care acetaminophen (a non-narcotic pain medication) 1000 milligram (mg) tablets with an expiration date of 11/2025, two packets of Medline 0.9 ounce (oz) lubricating jelly with an expiration date of 08/2022, two packets of Medline 0.9 oz lubricating jelly with an expiration date of [DATE], a packet of Medline 0.9oz lubricating jelly with an expiration date of [DATE], two Medline povidone iodine (a topical skin antiseptic) 10% swab sticks with an expiration date of 10/2024, a Medline povidone iodine 10% with an expiration date of 02/2025, a Medline…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-31 · tag F0638 — pattern
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and review of the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (LTC RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to complete non-comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner. This affected four residents (#2, #8, #25, and #26) out of four residents reviewed for non-comprehensive resident assessments. The facility census was 49.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #2 revealed an admission date of 11/03/20 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, hypertension, altered mental status, and dysphagia. On 12/16/25 at 11:28 A.M., review of the quarterly MDS assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/28/25 revealed it had not yet been completed. Sections A, B, C, GG, I, J, L, N, O, and S had not been completed. On 12/16/25 at 12:23 P.M., an interview with Regional MDS Nurse #204 verified Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment had an ARD date of 11/28/25 and it had not yet been completed. On 12/16/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation in the medical records for Resident #4, #8, #47 and #51. This affected four residents (Residents #4, #8, #47 and #51) out of 25 residents reviewed for resident records. The facility census was 49. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 02/21/23 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease and contracted hands. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 had impaired cognition. Review of the wound assessment dated [DATE] by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #302, who was also the facility ' s skin nurse, revealed Resident #51 had an Unstageable Pressure Ulcer (full-thickness tissue loss with the base of the ulcer covered by slough (yellow, tan, gray, green or brown) or eschar (tan, brown or black) in the wound bed) to her right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for Resident #44 and Resident #30. This affected two residents (#44 and #30) out of two residents reviewed for call lights. The facility census was 49.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including stroke, respiratory failure, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), aphasia (a language disorder due to brain damage), hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis or weakness), hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body), and malnutrition. Review of the care plan dated 07/03/25 revealed Resident #44 was at risk for falls with an intervention to keep the call light within reach.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 was moderately cognitive impaired, had upper limb impairment on one side, required maximal assistance or was completely dependent on staff for care needs, did not reject care,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, review of the resident handbook and facility policy review, the facility failed to honor visitors per the preference of Resident #63. This affected one resident (#63) of one resident reviewed for visitation. The facility census was 49.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #63 revealed an admission date of 08/07/25 with diagnoses including sepsis, chronic kidney disease and malignant neoplasm (cancer) of the prostate.Review of the nursing progress note dated 09/30/25 at 3:54 P.M. for Resident #63 revealed a plan of care meeting was held with the resident and his son. The facility offered hospice care and discussed Resident #63's decline in status.Review of the text message dated 10/26/25 at 8:31 A.M. sent from Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #207 to Regional Staff Educator #208. LPN #207 stated she was instructed by the facility's staff aide that family were not permitted to spend the night in the building. She stated she was updating her as Resident #63's son had spent the previous night (10/25/25 into 10/26/25) with his father.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, review of the facility investigation and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of misappropriation to the State Agency for Resident #17. This affected one resident (#17) of two residents reviewed for misappropriation. The facility census was 49.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an admission date of [DATE] with diagnoses including fractures of the left tibia and fibula, multiple sclerosis, diabetes and dependence on renal dialysis. Resident #17 expired at the hospital on [DATE] at 10:07 A.M.Review of the physician's orders for [DATE] for Resident #17 revealed an order for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (narcotic pain medication) 5-325 milligrams (mg), one tablet every six hours as needed for pain dated [DATE]. This order was discontinued on [DATE] at 3:14 P.M.Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for [DATE] for Resident #17 revealed she had received her last dose of Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325 mg…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and review of the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (LTC RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to complete significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments in a timely manner for Residents #11 and #15. This affected two residents (#11 and #15) out of three residents reviewed for comprehensive resident assessments. The facility census was 49.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #11 revealed an admission date of 03/08/20 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bladder cancer, major depressive disorder, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. Resident #11 was admitted to hospice services on 11/06/25. On 12/16/25, review of the significant change MDS assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/14/25 revealed it had not yet been completed. Sections A, B, C, GG, I, J, L, N, O, S, and V had not been completed. On 12/16/25 at 12:23 P.M., an interview with Regional MDS Nurse #204 verified Resident #11's significant change MDS assessment had an ARD date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurately completed. This affected two residents (#25 and #51) of 25 residents' assessments reviewed. The facility census was 49.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 02/21/23 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, chronic pain, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension and anxiety. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #51 revealed she had an order for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams (mg) every six hours as needed for pain dated 07/15/24. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October 2025 for Resident #51 revealed she had received Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 5-325 mg for pain on 10/01/25 at 1:00 A.M. and 8:50 P.M., on 10/03/25 at 8:53 A.M., on 10/04/25 at 1:40 P.M. and 8:44 P.M., and on 10/05/25 at 6:02 A.M. and 8:44 P.M. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to timely update care plans to address changes in a resident's condition. This affected one resident (#51) of 25 resident care plans reviewed. The facility census was 49.Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an admission date of 02/21/23 with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease and contracted hands. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 had impaired cognition.Review of the wound assessment dated [DATE] by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #302, who is also the facility's skin nurse, revealed Resident #51 had an unstageable pressure ulcer (full-thickness tissue loss with the base of the ulcer covered by slough (yellow, tan, gray, green or brown) or eschar (tan, brown or black) in the wound bed) to her right second and third fingers (documentation error as it should be third and fourth fingers) and these were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, interview and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to ensure Resident #44 received needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). This affected one resident (#44) out of five residents reviewed for ADL. The facility census was 49.Findings include:Review of the medical record revealed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including stroke, respiratory failure, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), aphasia (a language disorder due to brain damage), hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis or weakness), hemiparesis (paralysis on one side of the body), and malnutrition.Review of the care plan revealed Resident #44 had a potential for alteration in skin integrity due to fragile skin dated 06/17/25 with an intervention to keep the resident's nails short and clean.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #44 was moderately cognitively impaired, had upper limb impairment on one side, was dependent…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $428K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH