No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Riverside Health Services

1008 Arkansas Street, Arkoma, OK 74901 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 56 certified beds · (918) 875-3107 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited May 20261 immediate-jeopardy citation$89,918 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • the CMS record shows $89,918 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-27)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4600 Towson Ave · (479) 274-6900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1112 Towson Ave · (479) 782-9210 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
J-Sac's0.6 mi
1516 Main St · (918) 875-9057 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1 Circle Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.7%13.6%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%3.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%1.9%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.4%2.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.7%3.4%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%4.7%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication50.7%25.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.7%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control8.7%17.1%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.6%17.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.8%1.4%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
1.28
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.08
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
58.5%
Total nursing turnover
87.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 56 beds and averages 39.6 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.38 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.32 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-06)
0
at the previous standard inspection (2023-10-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    On 03/03/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to have a system in place to ensure dependent residents were repositioned every two hours to prevent new and worsening pressure ulcers. On 03/03/25 at 6:00 pm, the OSDH was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On 03/03/25 at 6:15 p.m., the facility administrator and DON were notified of the IJ situation and provided a copy of the IJ template. On 03/05/25 at 10:06 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was submitted to the OSDH. The plan of removal, read in part, 1. DON/Designee Completed 100% Care Plan Audit to ensure Interventions are in place to prevent further Skin Breakdown on 3/3/25 and 3/4/25. 2. DON/Designee In-serviced Licensed Nursing Staff on 3/3/25 regarding: Facility Policy on Turn Schedule. Repositioning Policy and Procedure. Shift Documentation of ADL Care including Turning and Repositioning. 3. DON/ADON Completed 100% Skin Sweep with No New Skin Issues Identified on 3/3/25. 4. RNC [regional nurse consultant] In-serviced Admin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-03-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to immediately notify the physician of a pressure ulcer for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for a physician notification of a resident change in condition. The administrator identified 48 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 03/10/26 at 11:55 a.m., the ADON was observed to provide wound care for Resident #1. The resident had a pressure ulcer to the coccyx area. Resident #1 was observed to be lying on an air mattress. An undated Notification of Changes policy, read in part, The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification.Circumstances requiring notification include: .Circumstances that require a need to alter treatment. A progress note, dated 11/27/25, showed a weekly nursing evaluation. The evaluation showed Resident #1's skin was warm and dry, skin color was normal, and skin turgor was normal. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the development/worsening of pressure ulcers for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The ADON identified eight residents who currently had pressure ulcers. Findings: On 03/10/26 at 11:55 a.m., the ADON was observed to provide wound care for Resident #1. The resident had a pressure ulcer to the coccyx area. Resident #1 was observed to be lying on an air mattress. An undated Wound Treatment Management policy, read in part, Wound treatment will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing changes. The baseline care plan, dated 11/21/25, showed Resident #1 currently had skin integrity issues. The care plan showed the staff was to apply zinc cream to Resident #1's bottom twice a day for prevention of skin breakdown. A nursing progress note, dated 11/27/25, showed a weekly evaluation. The evaluation showed Resident #1's skin was warm and dry, skin color was normal, and skin turgor was normal. An admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.The DON identified 38 residents resided in the facility.Findings:An undated Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, read in part, The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of alleged violations to the administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies.An admission assessment, dated 01/22/26, showed Res #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (a test for cognition) score of 3, which indicated severely impaired cognition.A physician progress note, dated 04/29/26 at 7:57 a.m., read in part, Follow-up evaluation conducted today regarding prior concerns of potential inappropriate physical contact involving the patient and spouse. There have been allegations of possible sexual behavior; however, no such activity has been witnessed by staff.On 05/06/26 at 11:00 a.m., the DON stated on 04/28/26, the administrator was notified by a certified nurse aide of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-29 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — pattern
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to update the facility assessment as the acuity level of resident care increased. The DON identified 36 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility assessment, dated 10/15/25, read in part, Nursing facilities will conduct, document, and review a facility-wide assessment, which includes both their resident population and the resources that facility needs to care for their residents (42CFR SS483.71). The assessment will be reviewed annually and updated as needed.The purpose of the assessment is to evaluate the resident population and determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies. Use this assessment to make decisions about your direct care staff needs (including those who provide services under contract and volunteers), as well as your ability to provide services to the residents in your facility, at least annually and as necessary, for the above requirement. Using evidence-based, data driven methods focus on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to perform pressure ulcer care in a manner to prevent infection for 1 (#3) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. A weekly wound flow sheet, dated 04/15/26, showed 11 residents with pressure ulcers. Findings:On 04/29/26 at 2:10 p.m., LPN #1 donned gloves and gown and entered Resident #3's room to provide pressure ulcer care. LPN #1 was observed to push personal items to one side and place two plastic trash bags on Resident #3's overbed table, next to the resident's personal items. LPN #1 did not sanitize the resident's overbed table prior to placing their dressing change supplies, bags, and gloves on the overbed table. CNA #1 and LPN #1 stepped to each side of the bed and positioned Resident #3 onto their right side. LPN #1 used their gloved hand to wipe feces from the Resident #3's upper left leg and buttock. LPN #1 then stepped back, and CNA #2 stepped to the side of the bed and provided incontinent care. CNA #1 and CNA #2 provided incontinent care, removed the soiled cloth bed pad, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-27 · tag F0729 — pattern
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure CMAs had the proper certifications to pass medications for 3 (#1, 2, and #3) of 8 sampled CMAs reviewed for certifications to pass meds via a gastrostomy tube.The DON identified 24 residents received medications through their peg tubes. An undated Medication Administration policy, read in part, medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice.1.On [DATE], upon reviewing CMA #1's certifications, CMA #1's advanced gastrostomy certification showed to have expired on [DATE].Resident #1's 10/2025 MAR showed CMA #1 had administered medications to Resident #1 on [DATE] through their peg tube (feeding tube into the stomach).2.On [DATE], upon reviewing CMA #2's certification, CMAs #2s advanced gastrostomy certification had expired on [DATE].Resident #1's 10/2025 MAR showed CMA #2 had administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to update behavior care plans for 3 (#1, 2, and #4) of 3 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed for their interventions in the management of routinely displayed inappropriate behavior. The DON identified three residents routinely displayed inappropriate behavior. Findings: 1. On 07/27/25 at 3:15 p.m., Resident #1 was observed entering the dining room. Resident #2 was observed sitting at a table in the corner of the dining room, with windows located on both walls of the corner. Resident #1 stopped and stared in the direction of Resident #2 for several minutes while mumbling unintelligible words under their breath. When Resident #1 was asked what they were saying, the resident only smiled and shook their head no. Several seconds later, Resident #2 smiled and pointed out the window as an ambulance arrived with their emergency lights on. A nurse's progress note, dated 02/09/25, showed Resident #1 yelled at other residents, attempted to grab other residents, punched another resident, blocked doorways/staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure complete and accurate documentation for 1 (#2) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for complete and accurate medical records. The DON reported the facility census was 39. Findings: A facility policy titled Charting and Documentation, revised 07/2017, read in part, All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure. A review of Resident #2's medical records did not show any physician progress notes for Resident #2. On 03/03/25 at 1:17 p.m., physician #1 stated they had seen Resident #2 in person a couple of times since there was a wound noted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a new diagnosis of a serious mental health condition had a PASARR updated for 1 (#7) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for PASARR level ll. The DON identified nine residents with serious mental health diagnoses. Findings: Resident #7 had diagnoses which included pseudobulbar affect and a mood affective disorder. A PASARR level l, dated 10/26/18, showed the resident did not have a diagnosis of serious mental illness or other psychotic disorder. The annual assessment, dated 11/09/24, showed the resident currently was not considered by the state PASARR level II process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition. On 02/04/25 at 2:57 p.m., the DON reviewed the resident's clinical record and stated the resident had a diagnosis of mood affective disorder and a psychotic disorder. The DON stated a PASARR level ll referral should have been made to the Level of Care Evaluation Unit.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide RN coverage for eight consecutive hours seven days per week during 2 (October 2024 and January 2025) of 4 months reviewed for having RN coverage for eight consecutive hours seven days per week. The administrator identified 40 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The CASPER report for fisal year Quarter 4 2024 triggered for no RN coverage on four or more days within the quarter. A review of payroll documents for October 2024 and January 2025 showed there was no RN coverage on the following days since the last period covered on the CASPER report: October 5-6, 12-13, and 26-27 and January 5, 12, 19, and 26. On 02/05/25 at 4:44 p.m., the business office manager was asked if they had submitted all of the documents to verify RN coverage for October 2024 and January 2025. They stated that was all they could account for in their punch system. They stated the DON did not punch, but completed missed visit forms. They stated they gave all that they had. On 02/06/25 at 8:24 a.m., the DON acknowledged there was no RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides demonstrated competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for resident needs. The Administrator reported 30 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A sample of employee files were reviewed. No documentation was found related to demonstration of nurse aide competency and/or skills checklists. On 07/13/22 at 9:07 a.m., CNA #1 reported it had been a long time since the facility had an annual skills fair or competency check-off. The CNA stated the facility had an orientation checklist for new CNA's and the staff responsible for training would help with completing the orientation checklist. On 07/13/22 at 9:16 a.m., CNA #2 reported there was an orientation checklist for newly hired CNA's but she could not remember having an annual skills fair with competency check-off in a long time. On 07/13/22 at 9:26 a.m., CNA #3 reported she had worked at the facility for two years. She stated she had a skills check-off in November 2020 provided by the lead CNA. CNA #3 stated there had not been an annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide an advanced beneficiary notice (ABN), describing charges for covered and non-covered services, for three (#31, #12, and #22) of three residents reviewed for Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice. The Administrator reported five residents were discharged from skilled services in the past six months. Findings: A review of the clinical records for residents #31, #12, and #22 contained no documentation an ABN had been provided to residents and/or their representative. 1. Resident #31 was admitted to skilled services on 01/19/22 and discharged from skilled services on 04/30/22. 2. Resident #12 was admitted to skilled services on 01/19/22 and discharged from skilled services on 04/03/22. 3. Resident #22 was admitted to skilled services on 01/10/22 and discharged from skilled services on 04/19/22. There was no documentation Resident #31, Resident #12 and Resident #22 recevied ABN when discharging from skilled services. On 07/11/22 at 4:02 p.m., the Business Office Manager reported she had been in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary ice machine for storage of ice. The Administrator reported 30 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 07/11/22 at 11:53 a.m., the ice machine in the main dining room was observed to be unlocked. The ice guard was observed to have a black residue build-up along the lip of the guard, extending completely across the front of the guard. A Cleaning Log, posted on the front of the ice machine, showed a date of 03/06/22 as the last date the machine was cleaned. On 07/11/22 at 12:28 p.m., dietary staff #1 reported being the last to clean the ice machine and confirmed his initials and a cleaning date of 03/06/22. He was shown the black build-up and he stated it did not always come off. He obtained a clean cloth, wiped the black residue off, and stated he would be sure to clean it in the future. On 07/11/22 at 12:35 p.m., dietary staff reported residents did not access the ice machine themselves. The staff reported if a resident needed ice, staff would get it for them. The staff stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$89,918 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $46,898 — penalty dated 2026-02-27
  • $43,020 — penalty dated 2025-02-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RIVERSIDE HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 08/18/2016
RIVERSIDE PROPERTY HOLDINGSOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 01/01/2020
ROGERS, JOHNIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL50%since 09/01/2024
ROGERS, JUSTINIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF50%since 08/15/2016
CHEEK, BENNIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 09/15/2025
HIGHTOWER, GARYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 92%Medicare 8%Other / private 0%

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$502per resident / day
operating cost
$15,249per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$496per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375371. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next