Barnsdall Nursing Home
411 S 4th Street, Barnsdall, OK 74002 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 40 certified beds · (918) 847-2572 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2019
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (27) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
- its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment for two ( #102 and #104) of three sampled residents reviewed for homelike environment. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/16/23, documented 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. On 08/15/23 at 2:55 p.m., Resident #102 was observed in their room. They stated, It's too cold. I am freezing in this room. Resident #102 stated they had to get under covers to nap. They were observed wearing a jacket. The thermostat across the hall from the residents room read 74 degrees. On 08/16/23 at 8:44 a.m., Resident #102 was observed in their room. They were observed wearing a jacket and stated it was freezing in the room. The ambient air temperature was measured at 67 degrees. On 08/16/23 at 8:54 a.m., the maintenance supervisor was asked what the policy was for maintaining comfortable air temperature. They stated they checked air temperatures daily and tried to keep them between 70 and 80 degrees. The maintenance supervisor was taken to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were put in place after falls for one ( #21) of 14 sampled residents reviewed for care plans. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/15/23, documented 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Falls policy, dated 05/26/21, read in part, .All falls are to be care planned .within 72 hours . Resident #21 had diagnoses which included chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, HTN, COPD, and anxiety. An annual assessment, dated 06/03/23, documented Resident #21 required extensive assistance of one for bed mobility and transfers. The assessment documented Resident #21 had one fall with injury. BIMS 08 A Care Plan, last revised 07/08/23, documented Resident #21 had seven falls from 01/22/23 through 07/08/23. The resident sustained injuries with three of the falls. There were no new interventions implemented after each fall. On 08/18/23 at 10:28 a.m., the DON was asked if Resident #21 was at risk for falls. They stated, Yes. The DON was asked what interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were available and administered as orderered for three (#6, 12, and #22) of six sampled residents reviewed for medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/15/23, documented 28 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included pain and anxiety. A Resident Assessment, dated 05/18/23, documented Resident #6 had pain and facial grimacing. A Physician's Order, dated 03/08/22, documented hydrocodone/acetaminophen 7.5/325 mg one tablet daily at bedtime for pain. A Physician's Order, dated 04/11/23, documented Lorazepam intensol 2 mg/ml, give 0.5 ml daily at 3:00 p.m. for anxiety. A Physician's Order, dated 06/22/23, documented Lorazepam intensol 2 mg/ml, give 0.5 ml every two hours as needed for anxiety. A June MAR, documented the following: a. Hydrocodone/acetaminophen 7/5/325 mg had been circled on 06/20 and 06/21/23., and b. Lorazepam intensol 2 mg/ml had been circled twice on 06/19, twice on 06/20, twice on 06/21, and once on 06/22/23.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatment was provided per physician orders for one ( #12) of one sampled resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/15/23, documented one resident had a pressure ulcer. Findings: Resident #12 had diagnoses which included pressure ulcer to the right outer foot. A Physician's Order, dated 08/02/23, documented to apply medihoney to the right outer foot pressure ulcer. On 08/16/23 at 9:22 a.m., LPN #1 was observed to provide wound care to Resident #12's right outer foot pressure ulcer. LPN #1 applied hydrogel to the wound bed. On 08/17/23 at 10:29 p.m., LPN #2 was asked what the policy was for providing wound care. They stated, According to the orders. LPN #2 was asked how they ensured staff followed physician orders for wound care. They stated they read the orders every time before providing the treatment. LPN #2 was asked what Resident #12's order was for wound care to the right outer foot pressure ulcer. They stated it was for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan had been developed for six (#6, #7, #10, #12, #17, #21) of 11 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 25 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy titled, Care Plan Guidelines, documented: .In long ter [Sic] care facilities, the care plan is the basis of the work routine. When properly utilized, it provides a guideline for daily care which can be implemented by nursing, dietary, activity, social staffs .Approaches .Approaches are actions taken by the staff to achieve the foal [Sic] and resolve the problem. Approaches should be worded so that the staff knows the exact action to take . An undated facility policy titled, Implementation of Care Plan Policy, documented: .The interdisciplinary team shall assist in developing quantifiable objectives for the highest level of functioning that the resident may be expected to attain based on the comprehensive assessment . 1. Resident #6 was admitted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to update/revise a care plan to reflect their current status related to pressure ulcers for one (#13) of one sampled resident whose care plans were reviewed. The facility census and condition identified two residents with pressure ulcers who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #13 was admitted with diagnoses which included chronic pulmonary embolism, acute embolism and thrombosis of other specified deep vein right lower extremity, anxiety disorder, and pain (unspecified). A quarterly assessment, dated 11/11/20, documented, the resident's cognition was severely impaired and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, personal hygiene and bathing. The assessment documented the resident was high risk for developing a pressure ulcer, utilized a wheelchair for mobility, and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. The care plan, dated 03/09/21, documented the resident required extensive assistance for activities of daily living, and was low risk for pressure wounds. Interventions included to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide sufficient nurse staffing related to no full time DON and/or RN at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The facility identified 25 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 05/03/21 at 10:10 a.m., during entrance conference the administrator was asked if the facility had a full time DON. He stated, No, not full time. He stated they have been without a full time RN since before March 2021. He was asked if the facility had an RN at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. He stated, Not everyday. He was asked if the facility had any nursing waivers. He stated no. Staffing was reviewed for March, April, and May 2021. The review revealed the facility had been without an RN on the following days: ~Sunday, 03/14/21; ~Friday and Saturday, 04/02/21 and 04/03/21; ~Sunday and Monday, 04/04/21 and 04/05/21; ~Friday and Saturday, 04/09/21 and 04/10/21; ~Monday, 04/12/21; ~Wednesday, 04/14/21; ~Monday, 04/19/21; ~Friday and Saturday, 04/30/21 and 05/01/21; ~Sunday,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to utilize a Registered Nurse at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. The facility identified 25 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 05/03/21 at 10:10 a.m., during entrance conference the administrator was asked if the facility had a full time DON. He stated, No, not full time. He stated they have been without a full time RN since before March 2021. He was asked if the facility had any nursing waivers. He stated no. Staffing was reviewed for March, April, and May 2021. The review revealed the facility had been without an RN on the following days: ~Sunday, 03/14/21; ~Friday and Saturday, 04/02/21 and 04/03/21; ~Sunday and Monday, 04/04/21 and 04/05/21; ~Friday and Saturday, 04/09/21 and 04/10/21; ~Monday, 04/12/21; ~Wednesday, 04/14/21; ~Monday, 04/19/21; ~Friday and Saturday, 04/30/21 and 05/01/21; ~Sunday, 05/02/21; and ~Friday and Saturday, 05/07/21 and 05/08/21. On 05/10/21 at 3:00 p.m., the ADON was asked if the facility had a full time DON. She stated no. She was asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a medication regimen review had been completed at least monthly by the consulting pharmacist for one (#12) of five sampled residents whose records were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census and condition identified 15 residents who were administered a psychoactive medication. Findings: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. Monthly medication regimen review were as follows: ~05/2020 Not provided; ~06/2020 Not provided; ~07/13/20 Documented the resident was on Bupropion SR 150 mg by mouth twice daily. For moderate to severe hepatic function, a max of 100 mg SR or 150 mg SR QOD is recommended. Reminder that reordering a CMP could confirm if the elevations in liver enzymes were transient or persistent. The physician agreed and documented, Repeat Chem 14. No response from the physician regarding the medication dose change recommended;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to: ~Ensure as needed anti-anxiety medications were not ordered for more than 14 days without documentation of a clinical rationale for two (#7 and #21) of five sampled residents whose records were reviewed for unnecessary medications; and ~Implement a dose reduction of a psychotropic medication as ordered by the physician for one (#17) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility identified 15 residents who received psychotropic medication and four residents who had psychotropic medication ordered to be administered as needed. Findings: An undated facility policy titled, Anxiolytic/Sedative Drugs documented: .The reason for the medication is documented in the resident's medical record and included in the resident's care plan .The continued need for the anxiolytic/sedative medication shall be documented in the resident's medical record . A facility policy titled, Documentation and Communication of Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations, dated April 2018, documented:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 17 citations
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure medication labels were written to reflect a current physician order for two (#13, and #14) of five residents whose medication labels were observed. The facility identified 25 residents who received medications. Findings: A facility policy titled, Medication Management, dated April 2018, documented, .In order to optimize the therapeutic benefit of medication therapy and minimize or prevent potential adverse consequences, facility staff, the attending physician/prescriber, and the consultant pharmacist perform ongoing monitoring for appropriate, effective, and safe medication use . 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included diarrhea. A physician order, dated May 2021, documented, .HM Fiber 28.3% administer 1 tbsp q am in liquid of choice .diarrhea, unspecified . On 05/04/21 at 8:00 a.m., during observation of medication administration, the medication label was observed to read, administer one tsp (teaspoon) po (by mouth) daily. Prior to administration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined the facility failed to: ~Ensure hospice records were accessible for two (#7 and #21) of two sampled residents whose records were reviewed for hospice services. The facility identified four residents who received hospice services. Findings: 1. On 05/04/21 hospice records were requested for resident #7 and resident #21. The charge nurse stated the records were not in the facility and he would have to call hospice. At 12:35 p.m., the charge nurse stated hospice was going to bring the resident records back to the facility as soon as possible. The charge nurse was asked how hospice care was coordinated with the facility. He stated, through word of mouth and through the nurses. He was asked how staff knew what services they were to provide for the resident as opposed to what hospice was going to provide. He stated, We are all responsible for resident care no matter what. He was asked who was responsible to ensure hospice records remained in the facility. He stated, I guess I am. He was asked what the facility policy was regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-05-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure equipment was properly stored and the room locked for one of 12 resident rooms on the west hall. The facility identified 15 residents who resided on the west hall. Findings: An undated facility policy titled, Space and Equipment, documented, .areas will have space for storing and utilizing mobility devices, assistive technology, physical therapy or adaptive equipment . On 05/03/21 at 11:25 a.m., an unlocked and unoccupied resident room on the west hall was observed to contain the following: ~Five beds; ~One floor buffing machine; ~Three wheelchairs (one lying on top of a bed); ~Four walkers (two lying on top of a bed); ~One commode sitting on top of a bed; ~One chair sitting on top of a bed; ~One night stand sitting on top of a bed; ~Lamp and lamp shade sitting on top of a bed; and ~Pictures lying on top of a bed. At approximately 11:30 a.m., LPN (licensed practical nurse) #2 was asked how many residents wandered in the facility. He stated three. At 12:00 p.m., maintenance was asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to respond to suggestions/concerns brought forth from the resident council group. This had the potential to affect all 33 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: On 02/11/19 at 1:30 p.m., a group meeting was held with ten alert and oriented residents. The group was asked if the facility acted upon grievances, concerns, and/or recommendations of the resident council group. They collectively stated no. They stated they never knew if the issue had been addressed by the facility. On 02/12/19 at 4:09 p.m., the social services director was asked how the facility addressed grievances, suggestions, and/or recommendations voiced during the resident council group meetings. She stated she shared the meeting notes with the DON (Director of Nursing) and administrator. She stated the concerns were discussed during QA (Quality Assurance) meetings. She was asked where it was documented the grievance, concern, and/or recommendation from the resident council group had been addressed by the facility. She stated on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-13 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a statement was posted and available with contact information regarding a resident's right to file a complaint with the state survey agency and the state Ombudsman contact information. This had the potential to affect all 33 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: An undated policy titled, Policy of Posting Ombudsman and State Contact Information, documented, .It is the policy of Barnsdall Nursing Home that information to contact the local Ombudsman and the State Department of Health be located on the bulletin board located outside of the dining room . On 02/11/19 at 10:20 a.m., the bulletin board across from the dining room was observed to have a medication cart that obstructed it's view which did not allow the Ombudsman information to be seen. The contact information for filing a complaint with the state agency was also obstructed. On 02/11/19 at 1:30 p.m., a group meeting was held with ten alert and oriented residents. The group was asked if they knew how to contact the state agency with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure resident bathrooms had hot water for eight (rooms 102, 104, 105, 107, 106, 108, 110, and 112) of 12 rooms observed for homelike environment on the west hall. The facility identified six resident bathrooms on the west hall. Findings: An undated policy titled, Temperature Checks, documented, .If the water temperatures are above or below state recommended parameters the maintenance director will adjust the temperature accordingly . On 02/10/19 at 4:00 p.m., the following hot water temperatures were obtained from the residents' bathroom sinks: ~ room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] - 69.9 degrees F (Fahrenheit); ~ room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] - 88.7 degrees F; ~ room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] - 79.2 degrees F; and ~ room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER] - 76.9 degrees F. On 02/10/19 at 4:08 p.m., resident #26 was asked how long it took for the water to get warm in her bathroom sink.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents received their baths for two (#2 and #3) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care. The facility identified 30 residents who required assistance from staff for bathing. Findings: An untitled policy, dated 06/03/16, documented, .It is the responsibility of the dayshift charge nurse to oversee that all baths are given in a timely manner and to report to [sic] DON [Director of Nursing] or ADON [Assistant Director of Nursing] if a resident continues to refuse the baths or bath is omitted so that an alternate plan of care may be implemented . 1. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included osteoarthritis and pain. A quarterly assessment, dated 01/18/19, documented the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making and required physical assistance for transfers with bathing. A care plan, updated 01/29/19, documented the resident required assistance from one staff member for bathing. On 02/10/19 at 2:58 p.m., resident #2 was asked if she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure hot water was kept at a safe temperature for two (South and West) of two halls in which residents resided. This had the potential to affect seven residents who resided on the South hall and seven residents who resided on the [NAME] hall who utilized hot water in their bathrooms. Findings: An undated policy titled, Barnsdall Nursing Home Policy on Water Temperature Checks, documented, .If the water temperatures are above or below state recommended parameters the maintenance director will adjust the temperature accordingly . On 02/10/19 from 3:53 p.m. to 4:11 p.m., hot water temperatures were obtained in the following bathrooms: ~room [ROOM NUMBER]/103 at 127.5 degrees Fahrenheit (F); ~room [ROOM NUMBER]/111 at 125.2 degrees F; and ~room [ROOM NUMBER]/115 at 136.4 degrees F. Three months of the facility's weekly water temperature logs were reviewed. No unsafe hot water temperatures were documented in the temperature…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a rationale was provided for continuance of a medication and/or dosage reduction for a consultant pharmacist recommendation for two (#8 and #22) of five sampled residents whose records were reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings: A policy titled, Consultant Pharmacist Reports, dated April 2018, documented, .Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or the prescriber .Prescriber accepts and acts upon suggestion or rejects and provides an explanation for disagreeing . 1. Resident #8 had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, secondary Parkinsonism, and bipolar disorder. A pharmacist recommendation, dated 10/17/18, documented a request for reduction for the following medications; ~ Buspar 10 mg (milligram) three times daily for anxiety; ~ Wellbutrin XL 300 mg daily for depression; and ~ Hydroxyzine 25 mg three times daily for itching. On 11/01/18 the physician responded on the form by checking the disagree box. There was no rationale…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-13 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide a therapeutic diet of altered consistency of pureed for one (#9) of one sampled resident who received a pureed diet. The facility identified one residents who received a pureed diet. Findings: A policy titled, Therapeutic Diets, dated 10/17, documented, .a 'therapeutic diet' is considered a diet ordered by a physician, practitioner, or dietitian as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition, to modify specific nutrients in the diet, or to alter the texture of a diet . Resident #9 had diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease. A care plan comment, dated 06/28/18, documented, Change diet back to pureed due to pocketing foods. A quarterly assessment, dated 01/10/19, documented she was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making, required assistance with eating, had swallowing difficulty with loss of liquids/solids from mouth, and held food in her mouth/cheeks. Current physician orders, dated February 2019, documented a diet order for puree/regular. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to: ~ have a functioning hand washing sink in the kitchen; ~ ensure a sanitary environment in the kitchen; ~ ensure kitchen staff followed appropriate glove use and handwashing during meal preparation and meal service; ~ ensure the dish washing machine operated per the manufacturer's specifications; ~ ensure there was adequate hot water in the kitchen for manual washing of dishes; The facility identified 33 residents who received nutrients from the kitchen. Findings: A policy titled, Sanitization, dated 10/08, documented, .All utensils, counter, shelves, and equipment shall be kept clean .All equipment, food contact surfaces and utensils shall be washed to remove or completely loosen soils by using the manual or mechanical means necessary and sanitized using hot water and/or chemical sanitizing solutions . Low-temperature dishwasher (Chemical Sanitization) Wash temperature 120 degrees F .Manual washing and sanitizing will employ a three-step process for washing, rinsing, and sanitizing .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to: ~ maintain infection control practices during administration of insulin for three (#08, #20, and #26) of six residents whose insulin administration was observed. The facility identified eight residents who received insulin injections; ~ maintain infection control practices when completing a fingerstick blood sugar for four (#11, #19, #20, #27) of four fingerstick blood sugar observed. The facility identified eleven residents who received fingerstick blood sugars; ~provide hot water for the hand wash sink located in the laundry room; ~provide a sanitizing agent for laundering facility linen and resident clothing; and, ~provide hot water for use in laundering facility linen and resident clothing. The facility identifed 32 residents who utilized laundry services. Findings: An undated policy titled, Guidelines for Laundry at Barnsdall Nursing Home, documented, .Hot Water Washing .Laundry should be washed with a detergent in water at least (160 F) [Fahrenheit] for 25 minutes . 1. On 02/11/19 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from abuse for one (#7) of one sampled residents whose records were reviewed for abuse. The facility identified 33 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: An undated policy titled, Barnsdall Nursing Home Policy and Procedure Reporting and Investigating, documented, Purpose .Each resident has the right to be free from verbal .and mental abuse .Policy Statement .Residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, facility staff .Definitions: Abuse: The willful inflection [sic] of .intimidation .or mental anguish to a resident . The facility's undated policy on prevention of resident abuse, documented, The Barnsdall Nursing Home will be pro-active in the prevention of any type of abuse .Licensed and supervisory staff are available each shift and responsible for intervening if any inappropriate behavior from staff . The facility's undated policy for protection of a resident during an investigation for an allegation of abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure their abuse policies and procedures were implemented to ensure: ~ thorough investigations of allegations of abuse and intimidation were conducted; ~ residents were protected during an investigation of an allegation of abuse; and ~ allegations of intimidation and/or abuse were reported within the required timeframe to the OSDH (Oklahoma State Department of Health) for one (#7) of one allegation of abuse that were reviewed. The facility identified 33 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: An undated policy titled, Barnsdall Nursing Home Policy and Procedure Reporting and Investigating, documented, Purpose .Each resident has the right to be free from verbal .and mental abuse .Policy Statement .Residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, facility staff .Definitions: Abuse: The willful inflection [sic] of .intimidation .or mental anguish to a resident . The facility's undated policy on prevention of resident abuse, documented, The Barnsdall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the proper agencies for one (#7) of one sampled residents whose records were reviewed for an allegation of abuse. The facility identified 33 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: An undated policy titled, Barnsdall Nursing Home Policy and Procedure Reporting and Investigating, documented, Purpose .Each resident has the right to be free from verbal .and mental abuse .Policy Statement .Residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, facility staff .Definitions: Abuse: The willful inflection [sic] of .intimidation .or mental anguish to a resident . The facility's undated policy for investigation and reporting, documented, .Barnsdall Nursing Home will complete a thorough investigation of an alleged incident .The facility administrator will provide proper notification of appropriate state and other regulatory agencies . A policy titled, Abuse P & P (policy and procedure), dated 12/04/17, documented, It is the policy of the Barnsdall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation abuse for one (#7) of one residents whose records were reviewed for abuse. The facility identified 33 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: An undated policy titled, Barnsdall Nursing Home Policy and Procedure Reporting and Investigating, documented, Purpose .Each resident has the right to be free from verbal .and mental abuse .Policy Statement .Residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, facility staff .Definitions: Abuse: The willful inflection [sic] of .intimidation .or mental anguish to a resident . The facility's undated policy for protection of a resident during an investigation for an allegation of abuse, documented, .Barnsdall Nursing Home will provide on-going safety to all residents during the investigation .Staff member(s) alleged to be in a potential abuse/neglect situation is removed immediately from resident areas .Staff member(s) alleged to be in a potential abuse/neglect…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure RN (registered nurse) coverage for eight consecutive hours for one of 14 days of staffing schedules reviewed. This had the potential to affect all 33 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Review of the facility employee time punch detail for 01/25/19 and 01/26/19 revealed the following: ~ 01/25/19 the RN worked from 2:03 p.m. and worked to 6:34 a.m. on 01/26/19; and ~ 01/26/19 the RN returned at 9:54 p.m and worked to 8:38 a.m. on 01/27/19. Which revealed the facility had 6.50 consecutive hours of RN coverage on 01/26/19. On 02/13/19 at 2:10 p.m., the administrator was asked why there was no RN coverage for eight consecutive hours on 01/26/19. He stated there was no reason, they just didn't. He was asked if they had a waiver for RN coverage. He stated no.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375482. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-08-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.