Bartlesville Health and Rehabilitation Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 119 beds and averages 74.7 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.11 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.36 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.80 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.11 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On [DATE], an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to ensure CPR was administered in accordance with the AHA standards of practice, which states the primary goal is to ensure a firm, hard surface to maximize compression depth and the facility policy for resident #6. CPR was administered in Resident #6's bed without a back board and was ineffective. On [DATE] at 5:15 p.m., the OSDH was notified and verified the existence of the IJ related to the facility's failure to implement their CPR policy and provide effective CPR to Resident #6.On [DATE] at 6:00 p.m., the administrator, DON, and ADON were notified of the IJ situation and the IJ template was provided. On [DATE] at 2:38 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the OSDH. The plan of removal, read in part, All nursing staff on duty received immediate education on code blue procedures, crash cart policy, and the location of emergency equipment, including the crash cart and back board, all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · H2023-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. implement interventions to prevent the reoccurrence of falls; b. complete incident reports and neurological checks according to policy and procedure; and c. revise the care plan with new interventions to prevent falls for one (#23) of two sampled residents reviewed for accident hazards. Resident #23 experienced 15 falls between 08/18/22 and 07/27/23. On 09/06/22, Res #23 fell and sustained a traumatic subdural hemorrhage, laceration on the left side of their face, and left sided fifth and seventh rib fractures, resulting in the resident being admitted to the hospital ICU. On 06/12/23, the resident fell and sustained a left fractured shoulder. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 08/22/23, documented 60 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated facility policy, titled Fall Protocol, read in part, 1. Assess resident .2. Document in the nurses notes the entire incident and resident assessment in detail. 3. Notify family and physician .4. Notify DON/ADON .5. Obtain,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pre and post dialysis patient assessments were filled out completely and routinely by staff for one (#45) of one sampled resident reviewed for dialysis care. The DON identified one resident at the facility received dialysis services. Findings: The facility was unable to provide a policy for the care of residents that received dialysis services. An admission record for Resident #45 documented they had been readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. It further documented Resident #45 had diagnoses which included stage five chronic kidney disease and dependence on renal dialysis. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 09/25/24, documented Resident #45's cognition was intact. On 12/02/24 at 1:24 p.m., Resident #45 stated the nursing staff had not been doing their vitals as they were supposed to related to their dialysis care. On 12/03/24 at 9:46 a.m., LPN #2 stated there was a binder at the nurse station that held the dialysis assessment forms. They…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff wore hair nets and beard guards while preparing food for the residents. The administrator identified 74 residents routinely ate meals provided by the facility kitchen. Findings: On 12/02/24 at 8:05 a.m., cook #1 was observed preparing food without wearing a hair net or beard guard. On 12/02/24 at 8:10 a.m., cook #1 stated they should be wearing a hair net and beard guard and that the facility was out of beard guards until the truck came in. On 12/02/24 at 8:30 a.m., the dietary manager stated the dietary staff should be wearing hair nets and beard guards. On 12/03/24 at 3:08 p.m., the administrator stated dietary staff should be wearing hair nets and beard guards.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. a licensed practical nurse cleaned their hands during wound care and catheter care for one (#16) of two sampled residents reviewed for wound care and catheter care; and b. failed to maintain a water management program to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the building water system. A resident matrix provided by the administrator documented seven residents had indwelling catheters. The DON stated 71 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Water Management, dated 01/23, read in part, It is the policy of the facility to have a plan to reduce the risk of growth and spread of opportunistic pathogens including Legionnaires in the building water system .Procedure .Create the water management team .Identify and document the building description .Identify control measures .Document collection and transport methods. A facility policy titled Hand Hygiene, dated 01/31/24, read in part, Appropriate hand hygiene is essential in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's representative was notified of a fall for one (#57) of one resident reviewed for notification of changes. The DON reported the facility census was 71. Findings: A facility policy titled Family Notification Policy, updated 01/2024, read in part, The facility should identify a primary contact person or POA to receive notification .Required notifications .Accidents or any injury including falls. Resident #57 had diagnoses which included dementia and weakness. A late entry nurse note, dated 09/13/24, documented Resident #57 had fallen. The note did not document the resident's representative had been contacted. On 12/04/24 at 9:37 am, LPN #1 stated they had spoken with Resident #57's representative on 09/18/24 and the representative was unaware the resident had fallen on 09/13/24. LPN #1 also stated that family should always be notified after a fall. On 12/04/24 at 1:19 p.m., the DON stated the family should have been notified of Resident #57's fall on 09/13/24.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical director and/or their representative participated in care plan development for one (#45) of 18 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. A Facility Listing Report, dated 12/02/24, documented 71 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy and procedure titled Policy and Procedure: Care Plans for Resident Care, dated 11/06/24, read in part, A comprehensive care plan will be developed within 7 days after the MDS has been completed. It should include measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified during the MDS process. All interdisciplinary team members will help prepare this and review and revise it quarterly if a change in condition is noted. A quarterly resident assessment, dated 09/25/24, documented Resident #45's cognition was intact. A facility document titled Care Plan Conference Summary, dated 09/26/24, documented the individuals who attended the care plan meeting. The documented attendees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor a resident after a fall for one (#57) of one resident reviewed for falls. The DON reported the facility census was 71. Findings: A facility policy titled Fall Policy and Procedures, updated 11/06/24, read in part, If a fall does occur .Assess resident .Neuro checks as necessary .Provide treatment/immediate nursing interventions as needed .Notify the family .Notify the DON/ADON .Provide continuous documentation as follows: Observed fall without head injury V/S every shift x 24 hours. Unobserved fall without head injury V/S with neuro checks every shift X 48 hours .All falls must be documented on every shift for 72 hours along with the intervention and how it is working. Resident #57 had diagnoses which included dementia and weakness. A late entry nurse note, dated 09/13/24, documented Resident #57 had fallen. The note did not document the resident's representative or the DON/ADON had been notified. It did not document if the fall was witnessed or unwitnessed. The note did not document neuro checks had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an antianxiety medication was not prescribed on an as needed basis without a 14-day limit or a physician's explanation why it should be used beyond 14 days for one (#69) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The ADON reported 29 residents at the facility were prescribed psychotropic medications. Findings: A facility policy titled Antipsychotic P&P, dated 09/2014, read in part, Residents who receive antipsychotic, sedative, hypnotic, antidepressant, or any other medications prescribed to modify behavior are evaluated to determine the effectiveness of the medication for the identified problems .The use of antipsychotics should include .Use of the medication only for the duration needed, and at the lowest effective dose. Resident #69 had diagnoses which included anxiety disorder and depression. A physician order, dated 11/13/24, documented the resident was to receive alprazolam (an antianxiety medication) 0.25mg every 8 hours as needed. The physician's order did not have a stop date. A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy for screening potential employees for the prevention of abuse for three (CNA #1, CNA #7, and LPN #3) of five sampled personnel files reviewed. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 10/2022, read in part, .Abuse prevention activities for the prevention of resident abuse .screening of potential employees . 1. A Provisional Employment Form and Consent and Release Form, dated 09/27/23, documented CNA #1 affirmed the condition for provisional employment related to a background check. An undated background summary, documented CNA #1 was eligible for employment. There was no documentation when CNA #1 was hired, registry checks were completed, and CNA #1 enrolled for criminal history monitoring under the facility. 2. A Provisional Employment Form and Consent and Release Form, dated 11/02/23, documented CNA #7 affirmed the condition for provisional employment related to a background…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated for two (#1 and #2) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 10/2022, read in part, .Abuse allegation steps .Conduct a thorough investigation . 1. Res #1 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, communication deficit, history of falls with injury, and cerebellar stroke syndrome. A significant change assessment, dated 02/27/24, documented the resident's cognition was severely impaired. OSDH incident report forms, incident date 02/28/24, documented intital reports of an abuse allegation for Res #1 were made to OSDH on 02/29/24 at 12:32 p.m. and 1:01 p.m. It was documented suspected abuse by CNA #1 was visualized on a video monitoring device in Res #1's room on 02/28/24 at 3:30 a.m. It was documented LPN #3 reported the video appeared to show CNA #1 physically restraining Res #1. It was documented LPN #3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to OSDH no later than two hours after the allegation was made for one (#1) of three sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The administrator identified 64 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy and procedure titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 10/2022, read in part, .Facility reporting .The facility will immediately report all alleged violations involving .abuse .as required by State law .Immediately .within two hours of occurrence . Res #1 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, communication deficit, history of falls with injury, and cerebellar stroke syndrome. OSDH incident report forms, incident date 02/28/24, documented intital reports of an abuse allegation for Res #1 were made to OSDH on 02/29/24 at 12:32 p.m. and 1:01 p.m. It was documented suspected abuse by CNA #1 was visualized on a video monitoring device in Res #1's room on 02/28/24 at 3:30 a.m. It was documented LPN #3 reported the video appeared to show CNA #1 physically…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$75,816 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $14,020 — penalty dated 2026-01-12
• $61,796 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-09-28 for 106 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $30K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK