No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Beaver County Nursing Home

200 East 8th Street, Beaver, OK 73932 · Government - County · 62 certified beds · (580) 625-4571 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jul 2022Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$15,642 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • the CMS record shows $15,642 in federal fines (most recent 2024-12-12)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (67%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
121 W 3rd St · (620) 624-0463 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
212 Branch 8th · (580) 625-3646 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
216 Douglas Ave · (580) 625-3042 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased14.8%13.6%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%3.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.2%1.9%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.9%2.8%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.5%3.4%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.2%4.7%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.5%13.7%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.5%25.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%94.6%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.9%17.1%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.0%17.5%17.1%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.812.311.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.852.961.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
0.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.73
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.63
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
66.7%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 35.1 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.81 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 67% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-12)
0
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-02)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY An IJ was identified from 12/11/24 through 12/12/24. The deficient practice remained at isolated level of a potential for harm. On 12/11/24, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to implement fall interventions for a resident with severe cognitive impairment and high fall risk. On 12/10/24, Resident #13 had a fall with injury in their room. Resident #13 fell during an independent transfer and was found by staff on the floor with their left foot rotated outward with no range of motion to left hip. Resident #13 was taken to the ER by staff. This fall resulted in Resident #13 acquiring a closed displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the left femur and laceration of scalp. On 12/11/24 at 3:04 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of a IJ situation. On 12/11/24 at 3:56 p.m., the administrator and DON were notified of the IJ situation and the IJ template was provided. On 12/12/24 at 12:34 p.m., an acceptable plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were individualized and revised after a fall for residents assessed as a high risk for falls for two (#13 and #15) of two sampled residents reviewed for individualized care plans. The administrator identified 35 residents resided in the facility Findings: An undated facility Accidents policy, read in part, The intent of this policy is to ensure this facility provides an environment that is free from accidents hazards over which the facility has control and provides supervision and assistive devices are provided for each resident to prevent avoidable accidents. This includes: a. Identifying hazards and risk, b. Evaluating and analyzing hazards and risk, c. Implementing interventions to reduce hazard, and d. Monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions when necessary. The policy also read, Individualized, person centered interventions will be implemented, including adequate supervision assistive devices, to reduce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage for eight consecutive hours, seven days per week. The administrator identified 35 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A PBJ Staffing Report, dated 07/01/24 through 09/30/24, did not document any RN hours for 07/06/24, 07/07/24, 07/12/24, and 07/13/24. A Nurses Schedule, dated July 2024, were reviewed and schedule did not document RN coverage for 07/06/24, 07/07/24, 07/13/24, and 07/14/24. On 12/11/24 at 11:03 a.m., the administrator was asked what the facility policy for staffing an RN eight hours a day seven days a week. They stated the facility should have RN coverage eight hours a day, seven days a week. The administrator was then asked to review the nurses schedule for 07/06/24, 07/07/24, 07/13/24, and 07/14/24, then asked if the facility had RN coverage for those four days. They stated No.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication rate of less than 5%. A total of 25 opportunities were observed during the medication pass with two errors identified. The total medication error rate was 8% related to two medications held without physician orders for parameters to hold medications for one (#11) of three sampled residents observed during medication pass. The administrator identified 35 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors policy, revised April 2024, read in part, a medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biological which is not in accordance with physician's orders. Resident #11 had diagnoses which include hypertension, edema, and dementia. A Order Summary, dated 12/10/24, documented an order for quinapril [hypertensive medication] 10mg by mouth daily and Lasix (furosemide) (diuretic medication) 10mg daily for edema. There was no documentation in the order directions for holding either medication if the blood pressure reading was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, records review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff washed their hands between residents while assisting dependent residents with feeding for three (#11, 19, and #35) of three sampled residents observed during dining. The DON identified six residents required assistance during meals. Findings: The facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy, revised 08/2015, read in part, Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol: or, alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: The policy also read, Before and after assisting a resident with meals. 1. Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia and delusional disorder. Resident #11's quarterly assessment, dated 09/30/24, documented the resident's cognition was significantly impaired and required supervision or touching assistance with eating. 2. Resident #19 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician and family representative was notified of inappropriate behaviors for one (#35) of 16 sampled residents who were reviewed for notifications. The DON identified 35 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #35 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included legal blindness, adjustment disorder with depression, and anxiety disorder. Resident #35's quarterly assessment, dated 11/04/24, documented the resident's cognition was mildly impaired. A progress note, dated 12/08/24, read in part, Reported by CNA that neighbor was in dining room this morning at breakfast sitting at the table and stood up and pulled [their] pants down and peed on the floor. On 12/10/24 at 10:03 a.m., Resident #35's POA stated they were not notified of the incident on 12/08/24. On 12/12/24 at 11:33 a.m., LPN #2 was asked who and when was someone contacted when a resident had a behavior like pulling pants down in front of others and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility policy to change O2 tubing was followed for one (#5) of one sampled resident reviewed for O2 tubing. The DON identified 12 residents had physician orders for O2 therapy. Findings: The facility's Departmental (Respiratory Therapy)-Prevention of Infection policy, revised 11/2011, read in part, The purpose of this procedure is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy task and equipment, including ventilators, among residents and staff. The policy also read, Change the oxygen cannula and tubing every (7) days, or as needed. Resident #5 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Bartter's syndrome, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and anxiety disorder. Resident #5's physician orders, dated 06/19/24, documented O2 at 2 liters via nc and as needed for SOB and HS. On 12/09/24 at 1:35 p.m., Resident #5's O2 tubing was observed labeled in pen on white tape and dated 11/01/24. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a diuretic and blood pressure medication were administered per physician's orders for one (#11) of three sampled residents observed during medication pass. The administrator identified 35 residents resided in facility. Findings: A Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors policy, revised April 2014, read in part, a medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biological which is not in accordance with physician's orders, manufacturer specifications. It also read in part, examples of medications errors include: omission- a drug is ordered but not administered. Resident #11 had diagnoses which included hypertension, edema, and dementia. A Order Summary dated 12/10/24, documented order for quinapril (hypertensive medication)10mg by mouth daily and Lasix (furosemide) (diuretic medication) 10mg daily for edema. There was no documentation in the order directions for holding either medication if the blood pressure reading was below certain parameters. On 12/10/24 at 8:25 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-07-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to: a. ensure temperatures were obtained and foods were held at 135 degrees on the holding table, and b. ensure dishes and utensils were cleaned/sanitized to prevent food borne illness. The Administrator identified 40 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: A policy titled, Food Temperatures, review date 05/01/22, read in part, . Ensure food is served at a safe temperature to prevent food-borne illness .Hot Foods should be maintained at a minimum of 135 degrees F . A policy titled, Dish Washing, review date 05/01/22, read in part, .Low Temperature Dishwasher(chemical sanitization): Wash-120 degrees F and Final Rinse-50 ppm .hypochlorite .on dish surface in final rinse .The chemical solution must be maintained at the correct concentration, based on periodic testing, at least once per shift, and for the effective contact time according to manufacturer's guidelines . A Monitoring Record, dated 07/01/22 to 07/20/22, documented on 07/05/22, 07/09/22 and 07/10/22 holding table temperatures were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to report and investigate an injury of unknow origin for one (#24) of one sampled resident reviewed for abuse. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 07/19/22, documented 40 residents resided in the facility. A policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment And Misappropriation of Resident Property, approved 05/26/21, read in part, .It is the policy of this facility that reports of abuse ( .including injuries of unknown source .) are promptly and thoroughly investigated .REPORTING AND RESPONSE .The facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse .including injuries of unknown source .are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made .in accordance with State law . Findings: Resident #24 was admitted with diagnoses of unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, tremors and hypertension. Resident #24's admission assessment, dated 06/08/22, documented the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. On 07/19/22 at 10:39 a.m., Resident #24's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to assess, monitor and intervene for an injury of unknown origin for one (#24) of one sampled resident reviewed for injury. The Resident Census and Condition report, dated 07/19/22, documented 40 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #24 was admitted with diagnoses of unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, tremors and hypertension. Resident #24's admission assessment, dated 06/08/22, documented the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. On 07/19/22 at 10:39 a.m., Resident #24's right hand was observed swollen. The swelling was observed to start above the resident's right wrist and continued to their fingers. There was no documentation in the resident's clinical record regarding an incident that happened to the resident's right hand/wrist. On 07/20/22 at 2:28 p.m., the administrator was asked if Resident #24 had an injury to their right hand. They stated they weren't aware of the resident's hand and didn't see anything documented. On 07/20/22 at 2:30 p.m., the DON and LPN #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure FSBS was obtained prior to administering sliding scale insulin for one (#41) of one sampled resident reviewed for insulin administration. The MDS coordinator identified six residents received insulin. Findings: A policy titled, Resident-Centered Medication Pass, review date 05/01/22, read in part, .Purpose: Allow administration of medications according to a resident's schedule/routine while ensuring the safe and accurate administration of all medications .Exceptions to the Resident-Centered Medication Pass Policy/Procedure: Insulin should be administered consistently each day . Resident #41 was admitted with diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. A Physician's Order, dated 03/17/18, documented to administer Novolog Solution eight units for a FSBS between 151-200. A Physician's Order, dated 06/22/21, documented to obtain FSBS before meals and at bedtime. Resident #41's quarterly assessment, dated 07/04/22, documented the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. It documented the resident received seven…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow up on a physician's response on a GDR for one (#17) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 07/19/22, documented four residents received antipsychotic medications. Findings: Resident #17 was admitted with diagnoses of schizoaffective bipolar disorder and dementia with behavioral disturbance. A Physician's Order, dated 10/13/21, documented the resident was to receive Zyprexa once a day. A Medication Regimen Review, dated 01/07/22, read in parts, .Could a reduction be tried for the Zyprexa . The physician's response read in parts, .defer to .psych provider . There was no documentation in the resident's clinical record the GDR was followed up on. Resident #17's quarterly assessment, dated 05/23/22, documented the resident's cognition was intact. It documented the resident received seven antipsychotic medications in seven days. It documented a GDR hadn't been attempted and there was no documentation of a contraindication. On 07/20/22 at 3:27 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,642 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,642 — penalty dated 2024-12-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375559. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next