Heritage Park

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 40.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 55 beds and averages 46.3 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.83 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.19 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.86 on weekdays — 4% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their trust account money on nights and weekends for three (#9, 10, and #26) of three sampled residents reviewed for access to their trust account money. The BOM identified 33 residents who had money in the trust account. Findings: The Policy and Procedure of Resident Trust Fund, last updated 03/01/24, read in part, .The management of the trust shall be managed by the business office or it's designees and ensure that proper accounting principals are followed .but not to exclude State and Federal regulations . A review of the trust account ledgers for Resident #9, Resident #10 and Resident #26 contained no entries of money being withdrawn at night or on the weekends. On 10/20/24 at 2:21 p.m., Resident #26 stated they could not get funds on the weekends. They stated if they wanted money they would need to request it and get it on Friday. On 10/22/24 at 8:25 a.m., the BOM stated they worked at the facility Monday through Friday and resident funds were kept in a safe in the administrators office.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0569 — pattern
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received notification when they were within $200 of the Medicaid resource limit of $2,000 for four (#5, 9, 10, and #26) of four sampled residents reviewed for notifications of trust balances. The BOM identified 33 residents who had money in the trust account. Findings: The Policy and Procedure of Resident Trust Fund, last updated 03/01/24, read in part, .The management of the trust shall be managed by the business office or it's designees and ensure that proper accounting principals are followed .but not to exclude State and Federal regulations . 1. Resident #5's face sheet documented they had a payer source of Medicaid. Resident #5's trust account ledger, dated 10/21/24, documented a current balance of $2,444.21. 2. Resident #10's face sheet documented they had a payer source of Medicaid. Resident #10's trust account ledger, dated 10/21/24, documented a current balance of $2,152.88. 3. Resident #9's face sheet documented they had a payer source of Medicaid. Resident #9's trust account ledger, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to: a. monitor fluid input and output for one (#93) of one sampled resident reviewed for fluid restrictions; and b. provide nutritional interventions for weight loss of providing nutritional supplements and double portions at meals for two (#3 and #5) of two sampled residents reviewed for nutritional. The DM identified four residents who were on a pureed diet. The ADON identified one resident on a fluid restriction, 13 residents who had physician orders for double portions, and 23 residents who had orders for health shakes with meals. Findings: An undated policy Encouraging and Restricting Fluids , read in part, .restricting fluids .record the amount of fluid .intake and output . 1. Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which included ESRD and acute kidney failure. Resident #93's October 2024 orders documented they had dialysis services every Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. It documented they received a renal diet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete pre and post dialysis assessments for one (#93) of one sampled resident reviewed for dialysis services. The administrator identified one resident who received dialysis. Findings: An undated policy Dialysis Care/ Arterial Fistula, read in parts, .All residents receiving dialysis will have monitoring before and after dialysis treatment to ensure condition is stable after treatment .The charge nurse prior to an upon return from dialysis shall evaluate the residents condition, including but not limited to vital signs and the graft/fistula site .check bruit and thrill . Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease and acute kidney failure. Resident #93's October 2024 orders documented they had dialysis services every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday. A dialysis communication form, dated 10/03/24, did not document a post assessment had been completed. There was no documentation a dialysis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent during the medication pass observation. LPN #2 identified 41 residents resided in the facility. The ADON identified 21 residents with ordered blood pressure parameters. Findings: An Administering Medications, policy, revised 04/19, read in part, .Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed .The following information is checked/verified for each resident prior to administering medications .vital signs, if necessary . 1. Resident #33 had diagnoses which included polyneuropathy and neurogenic bowel. A Physician Order, start date 09/10/24, documented Colace (laxative) give 100 mg by mouth two times a day related to neurogenic bowel. A fax transmission, dated 10/18/24 at 11:17 a.m., documented Resident #33's Colace order was faxed with an order category of pharmacy. On 10/21/24 at 9:20 a.m., CMA #1 was observed preparing Resident #33's medications for administration. They stated they were waiting for the resident's Colace to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-23 · tag F0868 — pattern
  Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medical director was part of the quality assurance program. LPN #2 identified 41 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The undated Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement policy, read in part, .The administrator is responsible for assuring that the facilities QAPI program complies with federal, state, local regulatory agency requirements . A review of the facility list of committee members as listed in their QAPI plan indicated all department heads, the administrator, and DON were part of the committee. The list did not include a physician and/or medical director. A review of the sign in sheets for the QA meetings for January 2024 to October 2024 contained no signature medical director being part of of the committee. A review of the medical director contract documented they were to participate as part of the QA program. On 10/23/24 at 12:04 p.m., the administrator stated the facility had not had a physician or medical director that participated as part of the committee for all of 2024. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0574 — isolated
  The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure contact information for filing a complaint with the State agency was available to the residents. LPN #2 identified 41 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 10/21/24 at 1:06 p.m., both resident halls and the main living area were observed. There was no information regarding filing a complaint with the State agency. On 10/21/24 at 2:15 p.m., a confidential interview was held with the resident council group. On 10/21/24 at 2:33 p.m., the resident council group was asked if they had been informed of their rights, and given information on how to formally complain to the State about the care they were receiving. They stated, No. On 10/21/24 at 2:51 p.m., the administrator stated the facility had information on how to formally file a complaint with the State agency posted. The administrator walked out of their office and observed the wall next to their office and stated it was right by the ombudsman sign. They stated it was not posted, but it used to be.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0577 — isolated
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the most recent survey results were readily accessible to the residents. LPN #2 identified 41 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 10/21/24 at 1:01 p.m., binders with survey results for 2018, 2019, and 2022 were located on the wall between the medication storage room and the administrator's office. The survey results from the most recent survey were not located. On 10/21/24 at 2:15 p.m., a confidential interview was held with the resident council group. On 10/21/24 at 2:32 p.m., the resident council group stated the State survey results were not available to read without having to ask. They stated they did not even know that they post them. On 10/21/24 at 2:50 p.m., the administrator stated the latest survey results were supposed to be posted. They stated they never got posted back after the painting.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for one (#10) of one sampled resident reviewed for homelike environment. LPN #2 identified 41 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Homelike Environment policy, revised 02/21, read in part, .Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible .The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized homelike setting. These characteristics include .clean, sanitary and orderly environment . Resident #10 had diagnoses which included cardiomyopathy and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. A Quarterly Resident Assessment, dated [DATE], documented Resident #10's cognition was intact. On [DATE] at 2:37 p.m., Resident #10 stated they had concerns with the wall spackle and the top of their wall. They stated they paid a lot of money to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed complete a discharge summary with a recapitulation of their stay for one (#41) two closed records reviewed. LPN #2 identified 41 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The undated policy, Discharge Summary and Plan , read in part, .a discharge summary and post discharge pan will be developed .the discharge summary will include the recapitulation of the resident's stay at this facility and a final summary of the residents status at the time of discharge . An incident progress note, dated 08/12/24 at 8:19 p.m., documented the emergency services arrived. It documented Resident #41 coded and the emergency services took over care. Resident #41's discharge assessment, dated 08/12/24, documented the discharge was due to a death in the facility. Resident #41's census report documented they were discharged from the facilty on 08/12/24. There was no documentation the facilty had completed a discharge summary for Resident #41. On 10/21/24 at 9:27 a.m., the DON was asked for the discharge summary for Resident #41. The DON looked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $84K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK