Hillcrest Manor Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 53 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 137 beds and averages 51.7 residents a day — about 38% occupied, or roughly 85 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.96 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.02 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.05 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-04-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was updated to include an intervention to prevent an identified pattern of falls for 1 (#39) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The DON stated 54 residents at the facility had care plans. Findings: A facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated December 2016, read in part, The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and/or their family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. A progress note, dated 08/12/24 at 2:30 a.m., showed Res #39 had fallen while attempting to go to their bathroom. A progress note, dated 09/25/24 at 11:34 p.m., showed Res #39 had fallen while attempting to go to their bathroom. A progress note, dated 11/06/24 at 3:26 a.m., showed Res #39 had fallen while attempting to go to their bathroom. A progress note, dated 12/20/24 at 3:35 a.m., showed Res #39 had fallen while…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff provided supervision to prevent falls which resulted in a fracture for 1 (#39) of 2 sampled residents who were reviewed for accidents. The DON stated 54 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled, Fall and Fall Risk, Managing, dated March 2018, read in part, Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try and minimize complications from falling. A progress note, dated 08/12/24 at 2:30 a.m., showed Res #39 had fallen while attempting to go to their bathroom. A progress note, dated 11/06/24 at 3:26 a.m., showed Res #39 had fallen while attempting to go to their bathroom. A progress note, dated 12/20/24 at 3:35 a.m., showed Res #39 had fallen while attempting to go to their bathroom. A progress note, dated 12/25/24 at 3:55 a.m., showed Res #39 had fallen while attempting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a CMA provided supervision to prevent a resident from falling for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for falls. The ADON stated 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, dated March 2018, read in part, Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. A minimum date set 5-day scheduled assessment, dated 05/01/25, showed in Section C Res #2 had a brief interview for mental status score of 15 (score indicated the resident's cognition was intact). The assessment further showed in Section GG, Res #2 required the assistance of a staff member who would physically support the resident and perform more than half of the physical effort to transfer to and from toileting. A nursing progress note, dated 05/13/25 at 3:30 p.m., showed Res #2 had been found by registered nurse #2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-04 · tag F0554 — widespread
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, records review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who self-administered their medication had been assessed for the ability to safely administer to do so for 1 (#13) of 9 sampled residents observed during medication administration observations. The DON stated one resident had self-administered medication at the facility. Findings: On 04/03/25 at 12:49 p.m., RN #1 was observed pre-setting an injector of insulin for Res #13. RN #1 was observed entering the resident's room and handing the insulin injector to the resident who raised their blouse, pushed the injector against their abdomen and pushed the button to release the insulin. The resident did not look to check the dose set on the injector prior to administering. The resident then handed the injector back to RN #1 and the RN departed the room. A policy titled Self-Administration of Medications, dated December 2016, read in part, As part of their overall evaluation, the staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided a written notice of transfer prior to being transferred to a hospital for 1 (#33) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The DON stated 54 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A progress note, dated 02/15/25 at 9:51 a.m., showed the facility initiated a transfer to a hospital for Res #13. A progress note, dated 03/16/25 at 12:36 p.m., showed the facility initiated a transfer to a hospital for Res #13. On 04/04/25 at 11:58 a.m., LPN #3 stated they had been on duty on 02/15/25 and was the nurse who transferred Res #33 to a hospital that day. When asked about what documentation was sent with the resident they stated that such items as code status, orders and face sheet. LPN #3 stated they had not heard of a written notice of transfer or that it was required to be given to a resident when they go to a hospital. They stated they had never sent such a notice with a resident. On 04/04/25 at 12:01 p.m., the DON stated when they had sent residents to a hospital they would send…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. a psychotropic medication had an appropriate diagnosis for 1 (#50), and b. the physician addressed a GDR for 1 (#39) of 5 residents sampled for unnecessary medications. The DON reported nine residents received antipsychotic medications. Findings: A facility policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, dated December 2016, read in part, Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. 1. A medication administration record for Res #50, dated 04/01/25 through 04/30/25, showed they had diagnoses which included dementia and delusional disorder. A Medicare five-day assessment, dated 02/14/25, showed Res #50 had a BIMS score of 12, which was indicative of a moderate impairment for daily decision making. The assessment also showed Resident #50 was receiving antipsychotic medication on a routine basis. A physician's order, dated 02/07/25, showed Res #50 was to receive risperidone (an antipsychotic medication) 0.5 mg by mouth daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment contained accurate health care information for 1 (#4) of 24 sampled residents reviewed for comprehensive assessments. The DON stated 54 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, dated November 2019, showed that each assessment must be accurate. An MDS annual assessment for Res #4, dated 01/08/25, showed in Section N0415 the resident was taking antipsychotic medications. Section N0450 of the same assessment showed the resident had not received antipsychotic medications. Res #4's medication administration record (MAR) for the month of January 2025, showed the resident had been administered the antipsychotic medication Latuda each of the seven days prior to the date of the MDS annual assessment, dated 01/08/25. On 04/03/25 at 8:07 a.m., Corp. VP #1 stated they had reviewed Res. #4's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] and the resident's January…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were completed and submitted to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for 1 (#21) of 19 sampled residents who were reviewed for resident assessments. The DON identified 54 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A Discharge summary, dated [DATE] at 2:18 p.m., showed Resident #21 was discharged from the facility on 10/25/24. The electronic health record showed the last assessment completed was a quarterly assessment, dated 10/25/24. The electronic health record did not show a discharge assessment had been completed on 10/25/24. 04/02/25 at 1:31 p.m., Corporate Vice-President of Operations #1 stated a quarterly assessment had been completed instead of a discharge assessment by mistake.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were bathed as scheduled for 1 (#1) of 3 residents reviewed for assistance with ADL's. The DON identified 54 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: An undated policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting, read in part, Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. A quarterly assessment, dated 01/29/25, showed resident #1 had a BIMS score of 15 which is indicative of independence for daily decision making and they required moderate assistance with bathing. Shower sheets from 02/01/25 through 04/03/25 showed out of 18 opportunities, Resident #1 did not have a shower documented on 02/08/25, 02/18/25, 02/22/24, 02/25/25, 03/04/25, 03/08/25, or 04/01/25. On 04/03/25 at 10:18 a.m., Resident #1 stated they were supposed to receive a bath twice a week on Tuesday and Saturday, but sometimes they do not get a bath. Resident #1 also stated when they asked…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure labs were completed as ordered by the physician for 1 (#24) of 6 sampled residents whose labs were reviewed. The DON reported 54 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A care plan, initiated 06/06/24 showed Resident #24 had diagnoses which included heart failure and hypertension. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/20/25, showed Resident #24 had a BIMS score of 13, which was indicative of no impairment for daily decision making. A health status note, dated 03/19/25 at 5:42 p.m., showed the physician was notified Resident #24 was complaining of a cough and congestion. The note also showed the physician ordered guaifenesin (an expectorant) 15 mg every four hours as needed and a test for RSV. A review of Resident #24's health record did not show a physician order for an RSV test on 03/19/25 or results of an RSV test collected on 03/19/25. On 04/03/25 at 4:02 p.m., LPN #1 stated when a nurse received an order for lab work they should collect the sample and put an order in the computer. They also stated if the lab was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, recored review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were implemented for 1 (#7) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. The DON reported 14 residents were on enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: On 04/02/25 at 2:19 p.m., RN #1 and CNA #2 were observed providing wound care to Resident #7. RN #1 was observed wearing a gown and CNA #2 was not observed wearing a gown. On 04/02/25 at 2:30 p.m., CNA #2 was observed providing incontinent care to resident #7. They were not wearing a gown. A medication administration record, dated 04/25, showed Resident #7 had diagnoses which included neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and stage IV pressure ulcer to the left heel. A quarterly assessment, dated 1/17/25, showed a staff assessment of Resident #7 was conducted. The staff assessment showed Resident #7 was severely impaired for daily decision making and was totally dependent on staff for care. On 04/02/25 at 2:39 p.m., CNA #2 stated they should have been wearing a gown. On 04/02/25 at 2:44 p.m., RN # 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent elopement for one (#1) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for elopement. The administrator identified 12 residents who were high risk for elopement. Findings: The undated Wandering and Elopements policy, read in parts, .If a resident is missing initiate the 'Elopement/Missing Resident Emergency Procedure' .Determine if the resident is out on an authorized leave or pass .If the resident was not authorized to leave, initiate a search of the building(s) and premises; and .If the resident is not located notify the administrator and the DON, the resident's legal representative, the attending physician and law enforcement . Resident #1 had diagnoses which included dementia. The Wandering Risk Scale, dated 07/04/24, documented the resident was at risk to wander. The Care Plan, dated 07/22/24, documented the resident was an elopement risk/wanderer related to a history of attempts to leave the facility unattended and wandered aimlessly. A Form 283 Incident Report, dated 08/12/24, documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$46,898 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $46,898 — penalty dated 2025-04-04
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-08 for 36 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $804K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK