Broken Arrow Nursing Home, INC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 101 beds and averages 66.6 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 34 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.14 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.84 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.13 to 0.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an environment free of accident hazards for 1 (West hall) of 5 resident halls. The director of nursing identified five residents wandered the [NAME] hall. Findings:On 08/14/25 at 12:10 p.m., the beauty shop door was open on the [NAME] hall. The beauty shop was unattended and a jar with a silver lid laid askew read, Barbicide Disinfectant Fungicide & Virucide. The jar was approximately half full of a dark colored fluid. There was an unsecured wood and glass cabinet with a shelf of hair care products which included Equate Brand Firm Hold hair spray, Sexy Hair Big Spray and Play Harder firm volumizing hairspray, Pravana Super Shape Extreme hair spray, and Biolage Hydra Source Detangling Solution. The door to the beauty shop was observed to have no lock to secure the door/room.On 08/14/25 at 12:12 p.m., the [NAME] hall was observed. There was a coaxial cord wrapped around the handrail and looped over the door handle of resident room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-01 · tag F0603 — failed to not confine residents against their will — isolated
  Protect each resident from separation (from other residents, his/her room, or confinement to his/her room).
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview , the facility failed to ensure a resident had the right to be free from involuntary seclusion for one (#33) of one sampled resident reviewed for involuntary seclusion. The administrator identified 66 residents in the facility. Findings: A polity titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, dated 10/01/17, documented the facility staff would not use involuntary seclusion. Resident #33 had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure. The resident resided in a room with their spouse. A progress note, dated 10/24/24 at 7:07 a.m., documented the resident was sent to a local hospital. A progress note, dated 10/28/24 at 5:23 p.m., documented the resident returned from the hospital, inquired about their spouse, and was told the spouse was aware of the resident's return to the facility. A progress note, dated 10/29/24 at 7:05 p.m., documented the resident remained on quarantine protocol per readmission. On 10/30/24 at 9:02 a.m. Resident #33 was observed in a room alone. On 10/31/24 at 09:36 a.m., the administrator stated all new residents and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the call light was in reach for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The administrator reported the census was 61. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease and edema. A significant change assessment, dated 10/30/23, documented Resident #1 cognitively intact for daily decision making and dependent on staff assistance for transfers. A care plan intervention, dated 04/07/23, documented Strive to keep call light in reach and answer promptly when activated. On 02/05/24 at 10:13 a.m., Resident #1 was observed sitting in a Geri chair in their room, the call light was not in reach. The resident stated staff usually did not leave the call light in reach. On 02/07/24 at 9:05 a.m., the resident was observed in bed, the call light was not in reach. On 02/07/24 at 10:20 a.m., the resident was observed in bed, the call light was not in reach. On 02/07/24 at 1:00 p.m., Resident #1 was observed in bed, the call light was not in reach. On 02/08/24 at 9:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents receiving antipsychotic medications were monitored for side effects for one (#2) of three residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The administrator reported the census was 61. Findings: Resdident #2 had diagnoses which included visual hallucinations and unspecified psychosis. A physician order, dated 01/26/24, documented the resident was to receive risperidone (an antipsychotic) 1 mg by mouth twice a day. A review of Resident #2's medical records did not document the resident was being monitored for side effects of antipsychotic medications. On 02/08/24 at 10:55a.m., the DON reported they did not have documentation of side effect monitoring for Resident #2.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0582 — pattern
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a SNF ABN to two (#14 and #169) of three sampled residents whose beneficiary notices were reviewed. The MDS Coordinator identified six residents who were discharged from skilled services with Medicare benefit days remaining. Findings: 1. Res #14 was admitted to skilled services on 04/17/23 and discharged from skilled services on 06/08/23 and remained in the facility. A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review documented an ABN was not provided to the resident. 2. Res #169 was admitted to skilled services on 05/22/23 and discharged from skilled services on 07/06/23 and remained in the facility. A SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review documented an ABN was not provided to the resident. On 09/27/23 at 2:25 p.m., the MDS coordinator reported Res #12, 14 and #169 were not provided with an ABN because they were not sure when an ABN should be given to a skilled resident.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to: a. attempt appropriate alternatives prior to installing bed or side rails; b. perform an entrapment risk assessment; c. review the risks and benefits with the resident and/or their representative; d. obtain an informed consent; and e. develop a care plan for side rail use for one (#20) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards. The DON identified 13 residents whose beds were equipped with a bed rail of any type. Findings: A Use of Bedrails policy, revised 11/01/22, read in parts, .If side rails are used in this facility, there must first be an interdisciplinary assessment of the resident, consultation with the attending physician and input from the resident and/or legal representative .Consent shall be obtained from the resident's legal representative prior to the use of bed rails .After appropriate review and consent as specified above, side rails may be used at the resident's request to increase the resident's sense of security (e.g., if he/she has a fear of falling, his/her movement is compromised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete annual skills competencies for two (CNA #1 and #2) of two CNA's whose employee files were reviewed for skills competencies. There were eight CNA's documented on the staff roster who had been employed over a one year. Findings: CNA #1 was hired on 01/22/21. There was no annual skills competency in CNA #1's employee file. CNA #2 was hired on 03/26/22. There was no annual skills competency in CNA #2's employee file. On 09/27/23 at 9:45 a.m., LPN #1 reported there were no annual skills competencies for CNA #1 and #2. LPN #1 reported they had let annual skills competencies fall by the wayside and needed to start doing competencies again.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement a water management program to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in building water systems. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents documented 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The CMS memo 17-30, revised date 06/09/17, documented CMS expects long-term care facilities to have water management policies and procedures to reduce the risk of growth and spread of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in the facility water systems. On 09/25/23 at 1:00 p.m., the administrator was asked to provide documentation of water management policies and procedures. No documentation of water management policies and procedures were provided. On 09/27/23 at 2:00 p.m., the DON stated the facility had no policy or procedure in place for a water management program to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in building water systems. The DON stated having not been aware of the requirement.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-28 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment for one (#20) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards. The DON identified 13 residents whose beds were equipped with a bed rail of any type. Findings: Res #20's admission assessment, dated 09/04/23, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required extensive two-person assistance with bed mobility and transfer. On 09/26/23 at 7:51 a.m., the resident was observed lying supine in bed with half side rails in the up position on both sides of the head of bed. An attempted interview with the resident was unsuccessful due to the resident's cognition. On 09/27/23 at 8:56 a.m., LPN #1 was asked to provide documentation of regular bed rail inspections for the resident. On 09/27/23 at 9:57 a.m., the resident was observed lying supine in bed with half side rails in the up position on both sides of the head of bed. An attempted interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document a resident's code status correctly for one (#38) of 14 sampled residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 63 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #38 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dementia, HTN, major depressive disorder, and chronic kidney disease stage IV. On 09/28/23 at 9:35 a.m., a review of the resident's clinical record documented the resident's code status as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). No documented DNR was located in the resident's EHR or paper chart. The resident had an Advanced Directive for Healthcare which documented the resident did not want life extended by life-sustaining treatment, including artificially administered nutrition and hydration. On 09/28/23 at 9:45 a.m., the DON was asked to look at the resident's code status. She reported it stated the resident's status was DNR. The DON was made aware of the only documentation located in the resident's EHR and paper chart was an Advanced Directive for Healthcare. The DON was asked if the code…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK