Broken Bow Health and Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 32.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 63.2 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.26 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.36 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent elopement for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents/hazards. Resident #3 exited the facility and ended up at a fast food restaurant after crossing a busy, four-lane highway. The ADON identified 62 residents resided in the facility and one resident was identified as high risk for wandering. On 05/19/26 at 12:40 p.m., an IJ situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to provide adequate supervision for Resident #3, who was determined to have a high risk for wandering, and had prior history of elopement. On 05/19/26 at 5:09 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of the IJ situation. On 05/19/26 at 5:23 p.m., the administrator, DON, and ADON was notified of the IJ situation and was provided the IJ template. On 05/20/26 at 2:01 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was transferred properly to prevent a fall with major injury for one (#2) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for falls. CNA #3 transferred Res #2 without the required assistance of another staff member resulting in a fall with a fracture to Res #2's left tibula/fibula. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents, dated 08/24/23 documented 44 residents required assistance with transfers. Findings: A Limited Lift Resident Handling Policy, dated January 2017, read in part, .The transfers will be designated into one of the following categories .2 or equivalent = 2-person transfer .Resident transfer status will be tagged in the resident's room to inform the staff of the appropriate transfer to use . Res #2 was admitted with diagnoses which included age-related osteoporosis, intellectual disabilities, dementia, legal blindness, and convulsions. Res #2's ADL care plan, dated 05/23/23, documented Res #2 required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was updated after a wandering risk scale increased to high risk for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for wandering and elopement risk. The ADON identified 62 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A care plan for Resident #3, dated 03/22/26, showed the resident had impaired cognition, but showed no interventions for wandering risks. A Wandering Risk Scale for Resident #3, dated 03/23/26, showed the resident was at low risk for wandering. The document showed the resident had no history of wandering but did have cognitive impairment. An admission assessment for Resident #3, dated 03/27/26, showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, delirium, and head injury. The assessment showed the resident had a BIMS score of 11 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. A Wandering Risk Scale for Resident #3, dated 04/22/26, showed the resident was a high risk for wandering. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — pattern
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain hemoglobin A1c lab as ordered for 1 (#5) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for assess, monitor, and intervene.The ADON identified 62 residents resided in the facility. Findings:A facility policy titled Lab and Diagnostic Test Results-Clinical Protocol, revised 11/2018, read in part, The physician will identify and order diagnostic and lab testing based on the resident's diagnostic and monitoring needs.The staff will process test requisitions and arrange for tests.A physician's order Resident #5's , dated 01/02/17, showed hemoglobin A1c (a blood sugar test) due in January, April, July, and October.Laboratory results Resident #5 were reviewed for January and April 2026. There was no documentation the tests were obtained.A physician's progress note for Resident #5, dated 05/18/26, read in part, We need an A1C with this patients labs every 90 days. Has been missed twice in a row now.On 05/21/26 at 8:37 a.m., LPN #1 stated if a resident had an order for lab, they would fill out a requisition form and lab would be collected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 08/21/25, an IJ situation was determined to exist related to the facilities failure to provide pharmacy services for Resident #1 in a timely manner.The facility was notified on 08/21/25 at 5:30 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified of the existence of an Immediate Jeopardy situation. On 08/21/25 at 5:38 p.m., the DON and administrator were notified of the existence of an IJ situation related to pharmacy services for Resident #1 . The IJ template was provided to administrator.On 08/23/25 at 9:26 a.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part,Removal of Immediate Jeopardy StatementFacility Name: Broken Bow Health And Rehab Date IJ Identified: August 21, 2025 Resident Affected: Resident #1Actions Taken to Remove the Immediate JeopardyUpon discovery, the facility immediately implemented the following corrective actions to mitigate risk and remove the Immediate Jeopardy:Resident-Centered Interventions-Resident #1 continues on current medication regiment with current cancer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 (#1, #2 and #3) of 3 sampled treatment carts were locked.The DON reported 61 residents resided in the facility.Findings:On 08/19/25 at 2:26 p.m., treatment cart #1 was observed to be on the left side of the nurse's station unlocked and unsupervised.On 08/19/25 at 2:27 p.m., treatment cart #2 was observed to be on the right side of the nurse's station unlocked and unsupervised.On 08/19/25 at 2:28 p.m., treatment cart #3 (wound care cart) was observed to be at the front entrance by the ADON office unlocked.A facility policy titled Security of Medication Cart, revised 04/2007, read in part, 1. The nurse must secure the medication cart during pass to prevent unauthorized entry .4. Medication carts must be securely locked at all times when out of the nurse's view .5. When the medication cart is not being used, it must be locked and parked.On 08/19/25 at 2:25 p.m. LPN #2 was observed walking away from the unlocked treatment cart. They walked into a medication supply closet and closed the door. There were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was updated for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for care plan.The DON reported 61 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A facility policy titled Care Plan, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated December 2016, read in part, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident .13. Assessments of resident are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. 14. The Interdisciplinary Team must review and update the care plan: a. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition;A physician consultation note for Resident #1, dated 03/24/25, read in part, Principal Diagnosis: Breast Cancer.A care plan for Resident #1, dated 05/27/25, showed no interventions or diagnosis for cancer was updated on the most recent care plan.On 08/21/25 at 10:51 a.m., the ADON reviewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-26 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who missed 77 cancer medications was included quality assurance and program improvement for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration.The DON reported 61 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, revised 02/2020, read in part, This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents . f. monitoring or evaluating the effectiveness of corrective action/performance improvement activities, and revising as needed . Coordination 2. The QAPI coordinator assists other committees, individuals, departments, and/or services in developing quality indicators, monitoring tools, assessments methodologies and documentation, and in making adjustments to plan.On 08/19/25 at 11:19 a.m., the ADON stated how could they QAPI for the cancer medication we did not know about.On 08/26/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0641 — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments had been completed accurately for two (#10 and #12) of 15 sampled residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. A daily census, dated 12/09/24, documented 57 residents resided at the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, dated November 2019, read in part, The information captured on the assessment reflects the status of the resident during the observation period (look back) period for the assessment. 1. An active physician's order, dated 02/09/24, documented Resident #10 was admitted to long term care under the care a contracted hospice provider. A significant change assessment, dated 02/09/24, documented Resident #10 did not receive hospice services. An active physician's order, dated 09/14/24, documented staff were to assess and document the resident's status and collaborate with a contracted hospice provider. A quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/11/24, documented in Section O that Resident #10 did not receive hospice services. On 12/11/24 at 2:00 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide ADL assistance with showers/baths for one (#9) of one sampled resident reviewed for ADL assistance. The administrator identified 55 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Bath, Shower/Tub read in part, Documentation 1. The date and time the shower/tub bath was performed. 2. The name and title of the individual (s) who assisted the resident with the shower/tub bath .Reporting 1. Notify the supervisor if the resident refused the shower/tub bath. Resident #9 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction and aphasia and dysphagia following a cerebral infarction. The care plan, dated 03/01/22, documented the staff were to assist the resident with a bath at least three times a week and per the resident's request. The care plan documented the resident was a two person assist with shower transfers. A quarterly assessment, dated 09/13/24, documented the resident had modified independent for daily decision making. It was documented the resident required moderate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident did not receive an antipsychotic that had been discontinued by a physician for one (#12) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified eight residents in the facility were prescribed antipsychotic medications. Findings: A facility policy titled Medication and Treatment Orders, dated July 2016, read in part, Medication shall be administered only upon the written order of a person duly licensed and authorized to prescribe such medications in this state. Resident #12 had diagnoses which included major depressive disorder with psychotic features. A medication order, dated 10/08/22, documented Resident #12 was to have been administered Risperdal [an antipsychotic medication] 0.5 mg once daily. A document titled Pharmaceutical Consultant Report, dated 07/17/24, documented a pharmacist recommendation to reduce the dose of four psychotropic medications which included Risperdal 0.5 mg once daily and Risperdal 1 mg once daily. The report also documented a physician's response…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the dish machine temperature and sanitizer concentration was monitored and logged daily, kitchen equipment functioned properly, and food was stored in an appropriate manner. The administrator identified 54 residents received meals from the kitchen. Findings: An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted on 12/09/24 at 2:45 p.m. The following observations were made: a. the paper towel dispenser at the handwashing sink was not functioning; b. the Dish Machine Temperature Log, for December 2024 did not document the temperature or the concentration of sanitizer for 12/05/24, 12/06/24, 12/07/24, 12/08/24, or 12/09/24; c. there were two opened bottles of prune juice with no received on date or opened date; d. there were 10 individual sized cups of ranch dressing with no date of preparation; e. there was an opened 32-ounce carton of whole eggs with no received on or opened date; f. there was an opened uncovered can of pudding with no received on or opened date; g. there was an opened uncovered bulk container of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,828 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,385 — penalty dated 2026-05-21
• $7,443 — penalty dated 2023-08-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $763K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK