Chandler Therapy & Living Center LLC
601 West 1st Street, Chandler, OK 74834 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 76 certified beds · (405) 785-7486 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $113,588 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-10)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (81%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.1% | 13.6% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.0% | 3.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.9% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.7% | 3.4% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 4.7% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.2% | 13.7% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.2% | 25.7% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 80.0% | 94.6% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.2% | 4.7% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.2% | 17.1% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 17.4% | 17.5% | 17.1% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.52 | 2.31 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 7.52 | 2.96 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 59% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 6.5–17.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 38.8 residents a day — about 51% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 81% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-07-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
On 07/13/23 at 3:09 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health (OSDH) confirmed the existence of an immediate jeopardy situation related to the facility failed to provide goods and services by ensuring adequate portions, options for extra food, and/or an alternative of equal nutritive value was offered to the residents in order to maintain optimal physical and psychosocial well being. On 07/13/23 at 3:09 p.m., the Administrator was notified of the existence of the immediate jeopardy. On 07/14/23 at 4:45 p.m., the facility provided an acceptable plan of removal for the immediacy. The plan documented the following: Plan of Removal 07/14/23 Menus will be reviewed by a dietitian and adjusted to meet dietary standards, as needed. RDO or Dietary Manager will place all food orders to ensure there is an adequate supply. If facility is out of a staple food item, it will purchased from a local supplier. RDO, RNC, RBOM, Dietary Manager, Administrator have the authority to purchase an food item needed from local supplier or food company as needed. RDO or Dietary Manager will order enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent elopement for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for elopement, which resulted in hospitalization for rhabdomyolysis, acute kidney injury, and UTI. The administrator identified seven residents who were high risk for elopement. Findings: The facility's Elopement policy, revised 12/2007, documented staff should promptly report any resident who was suspected of being missing to the charge nurse or director of nursing, if an employee discovered a resident was missing from the facility premises they should determine if the resident was out on authorized leave or a pass, if not on authorized leave, initiate a search of the building and premises, if the resident was not located notify the administrator and the director of nursing, legal representative, and law enforcement. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included unspecified dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and bladder cancer. Resident #1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide supervision to prevent falls and implement interventions to prevent falls for one (#16) of three sampled residents reviewed for falls which resulted in a fall with bruising to the left eye area, and a laceration above the left eye which required stitches. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents report, dated 08/24/23, documented 47 residents resided in the facility. Findings The facility's Fall Reduction Program policy, revised 03/29/23, read in parts, .All residents will receive adequate supervision, assistance, and assistive devices to aid in the prevention of falls. Each resident will be evaluated for safety risks including falls and accident Care plans will be created and implemented based on the individual's risk factors to aid in prevention of falls . Resident #16 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's, repeated falls, altered mental status, adult failure to thrive, and chronic pain. A fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure prepared food items were labelled with preparation and use-by dates and food items were discarded after use-by date during 1 of 2 kitchen observations.The administrator identified 36 residents received nutrition from the kitchen.Findings:On 12/08/25 at 9:43 a.m., the following observations were made in the walk-in refrigerator located outside the building: a. a covered plastic pitcher labelled grape, 12/02/25,b. a covered plastic pitcher labelled noodles, 12/03/25,c. a covered plastic pitcher labelled unsweet, 12/06/25, and d. a covered plastic pitcher labelled oj, 12/07/25. On 12/08/25 at 9:48 a.m. a cardboard box was observed containing salad dressing packets with manufacturer use-by date of 9/25 in the dry storage area in the kitchen.An undated facility policy titled Date Marking and Food Safety, read in part, the food shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed or discarded.An undated facility policy titled Date Marking for Food Safety, read in part, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 (#31) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility.Findings:An undated Abuse Policy and Procedure, read in part, We will endeavor to protect our occupants from maltreatment, which means adult abuse, exploitation, neglect, physical abuse, sexual abuse, neglect, and the misappropriation of resident property. It recognizes resident rights to be free from physical or mental abuse, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and any chemical and physical restraints as defined by federal regulation.An incident report form, dated 12/08/25, showed on 12/08/25 Res #31 made an allegation of verbal abuse against CNA #1. The report also showed CNA #1 was suspended pending an investigation.An annual assessment, dated 09/29/25, showed Res #31 had a BIMS (a test for cognition) of 11 which was indicative of moderately impaired cognition. The assessment showed Res #31 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus and anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility filed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the OSDH for 1 (#21) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility.Findings:An undated Abuse Policy and Procedure, read in part, All allegations of resident mistreatment, including neglect, physical abuse, mental abuse, sexual abuse, involuntary isolation, verbal abuse, injuries of unknown origin, and/or misappropriation of property, shall be promptly reported to the administrator and investigated by facility management. Administrator will immediately report the allegation to the Oklahoma State Department of Health and the local police.A quarterly assessment, dated 10/16/25, showed Res #21 had a BIMS score (a test for cognition) of 04, which was indicative of severe cognitive impairment. The assessment showed Res #21 had diagnoses which included anxiety and depression.An undated statement form, signed by CNA #4, showed Res #21 expressed suicidal thoughts and CNA #1 antagonized Res #21.An undated statement form, signed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was investigated for 1 (#21) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse.The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility.Findings:An undated Abuse Policy and Procedure, read in part, The administrator or administrative designee will conduct an immediate investigation of all alleged or actual incidents of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property.A quarterly assessment, dated 10/16/25, showed Res #21 had a BIMS score (a test for cognition) of 04, which was indicative of severe cognitive impairment. The assessment showed Res #21 had diagnoses which included anxiety and depression.An undated statement form, signed by CNA #4, showed Res #21 expressed suicidal thoughts and CNA #1 antagonized Res #21.An undated statement form, signed by CMA #5, showed Res #21 was yelling and CNA #1 was yelling back at Res #21.On 12/10/25 at 12:10 p.m., CMA #5 stated they witnessed CNA #1 shout at Res #21 and wrote a statement about it and slid it under the administrator's door. On 12/10/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was revised for 1 (#30) of 12 sampled residents reviewed for care plans.The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated medical diagnoses list showed Res #30 had diagnoses which included vascular dementia, bipolar, schizophrenia, muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait. An undated incident list for Res #30 showed they had non-injury falls on 11/15/25, 11/24/25, 11/27/25, and 12/12/25. Res #30's record was reviewed, and the care plan had not been revised to show interventions after each fall. On 12/15/25 at 11:40 a.m., the DON stated the care plan should have been revised after each fall to show an intervention.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 (#6) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The administrator identified 37 residents resided in the facility.Findings:An undated medication administration policy showed residents should be identified by the photo in the medication administration record. The policy showed to follow the six rights of medication administration which included identifying the right resident.A quarterly assessment, dated 09/11/25, showed Res #6 had a BIMS score (a test for cognition) of 15 which was indicative of intact cognition. The assessment also showed Res #6 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus and anxiety disorder.An incident note, dated 09/25/25 at 11:44 a.m., showed Res #6 was given another resident's medication by mistake. The medications given in error were Lasix 20 mg (a diuretic), Colace 100 mg (a stool-softener), Mobic 7.5 mg (an anti-inflammatory), Prilosec 40mg (a proton pump inhibitor), Xanex 0.5 mg (an anti-anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. menus were prepared in advanced for serving sizes and nutritional adequacy; and b. menus were reviewed by the dietitian for nutritional adequacy. The DON identified 32 residents who ate meals prepared by the kitchen. Findings: A handwritten dietary menu for the week of 03/09/25 through 03/15/25 was reviewed. The menu did not document serving sizes or therapeutic diets such as renal diets or diabetic diets for the residents. There was no documentation the menu was approved by the dietitian. On 03/11/25 at 12:00 p.m., dietary cook #2 stated the menus they followed did not document serving sizes, only the name of the item to serve. Dietary [NAME] #2 stated they just guessed how much to serve of each food item. On 03/11/25 at 12:15 p.m., the DM stated they were not certified and had been in the position for about a month and a half. The DM stated they had not had therapeutic menus with serving sizes reviewed by the dietitian since the change in food provider at the first of the year. The DM stated they were told by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-03-13 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to have a licensed administrator for the management of the facility. The DON identified 32 residents resided in the facility. Findings: On 03/10/25 at 2:00 p.m. an entrance was made at the facility. There was no administrator present and there was no administrator license observed posted. On 03/10/25 at 2:02 p.m. the DON stated the administrator quit last Friday (03/07/25) and had not been replaced.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — patternAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents rights to participate in the development and implementation of their person-centered plan of care for 3 (#1, 2 and #4) of 3 sampled residents who were reviewed for care plan meetings in the last six months. The DON identified 32 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, chronic pain, dependence on renal dialysis, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. A multidisciplinary care plan conference summary, dated 09/04/24, showed the resident had a meeting with staff members regarding their stay at the facility. A discharge return anticipated, dated 02/08/25, showed the resident was independent for daily decision making and their mental status for short term memory was okay. On 03/10/25 at 5:45 p.m., Resident #1 stated they had not had care plan meeting.2. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-13 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. a system was maintained to assure generally accepted accounting principles for each resident's personal funds account, and b. individual financial records were available to the residents through quarterly statements and upon request for 3 (#1, 2, and #4) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for personal funds accounts. The business office manager identified 18 residents with trust fund accounts. Findings: A policy titled Resident Right - Accounting and Records of Personal Funds, last reviewed 06/27/22, read in part,The facility will establish and maintain a system that assures a full and complete and separate accounting, according to generally accepted accounting principles, of each resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf .The individual financial record will be available to the resident through quarterly statements and upon request. 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, chronic pain, dependence on renal dialysis, major…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was permitted to return to the facility after they were hospitalized for 1 (#5) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for hospitalization. The DON identified 32 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A policy titled Bed-Hold and Returns, revised [DATE], read in part, The requirement that residents be permitted to return to the facility following hospitalization or therapeutic leave applies to all residents regardless of payer source .Residents who seek to return to the facility after the state bed-hold period has expired (or when state law does not provide for bed-holds) are allowed to return to their previous room if available or immediately to the first available bed in a semi-private room provided that the resident: a. still requires the services provided by the facility; and b. is eligible for Medicare skilled nursing facility or Medicaid nursing facility services. Resident #5 had diagnoses which included persistent mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PASSAR level I assessment was completed before or on admission for 1 (#7) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for PASSAR. The DON identified 32 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #7 was admitted to the facility 02/03/25 with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, depression, and anxiety disorder. A review of the resident's clinical record was completed and no documentation regarding the completion of a PASSAR level I was found. On 03/13/25 at 3:46 p.m., the DON stated they could not locate documentation a PASSAR level I was completed for the resident. The DON stated it must have been missed.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for one (#2) of three sampled residents reviewed for medications. The administrator identified 40 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included of anxiety disorder, hypertensive heart disease, and unspecified dementia. A physician's order, dated 08/07/24, documented to hold Ativan (benzodiazepine medication) for now and call if behaviors resume. A medication regimen review, dated August 2024, documented the resident was administered Lorazepam (Ativan) on 08/15/24 at 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., 08/16/24 at 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., 08/24/24 at 4 p.m., and 08/25/24 at 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. The resident's record did not contain documentation the order was resumed or the resident had any behaviors. On 10/11/24 at 2:02 p.m., the DON was shown the August 2024 medication administration record and asked if the facility had a physician's order to resume the lorazepam. They stated the medication hold probably fell off. The DON was unable to find an order to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a PRN order for an antianxiety medication had a 14 day stop date for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for medications. The administrator identified 40 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder, insomnia, unspecified dementia. A physician's order, dated 09/05/24, documented Xanax (benzodiazepine medication) Oral Tablet. Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for anxiety. The order did not document a stop date. On 10/11/24 at 2:02 p.m., the DON stated the medication should have had a stop date.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an annual comprehensive assessment was completed within 14 days of the ARD for one (#11) of 14 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The DON identified 40 residents who resided at the facility. Findings: Resident #11 had diagnoses which included diabetes. The annual assessment, dated 06/12/24, documented it had been completed on 06/28/24. The MDS 3.0 NH Final Validation Report, dated 08/09/24, documented the annual assessment, dated 06/12/24 was completed more than 14 days after the ARD date and was late. On 08/14/24 at 10:47 a.m., the administrator stated the previous MDS coordinator has not been completing MDS assessments timely. They stated they had not monitored MDS assessments to ensure they were completed timely but the previous DON had monitored.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure assessments were transmitted within seven days of completion for two (#11 and #92) of 14 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The DON identified 40 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #11 had diagnoses which included diabetes. The MDS 3.0 NH Final Validation Report, dated 08/09/24 documented the following assessments had been submitted late: a. The annual assessment, dated 06/12/24; and b. The discharge return not anticipated, dated 07/03/24. 2. Resident #92 had diagnoses which included acute kidney failure and sacral ulcer. The MDS 3.0 NH Final Validation Report, dated 08/09/24 documented the admission assessment, dated 06/21/24, had been submitted late. On 08/14/24 at 10:47 a.m., the administrator stated the previous MDS coordinator has not transmitted MDS assessments timely. They stated they had not monitored MDS assessments to ensure they were transmitted timely but the previous DON had monitored.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was completed for three (#22, 27, and #92) of 12 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 40 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The Care Plans - Baseline policy, dated December 2016, read in part, .A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission . 1. Resident #22 had diagnoses which included congestive heart failure and end stage renal disease. The Baseline Care Plan, dated 06/10/24, in the electronic health record, was documented as In Progress and was blank. 2. Resident #27 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia and end stage renal disease. The Baseline Care Plan, dated 01/13/24, in the electronic health record, was documented as In Progress and was blank. 3. Resident #92 had diagnoses which included absence of left leg below the knee, absence of right foot, and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. The Baseline Care Plan, dated 06/14/24, in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed for four (#3, 27, and #92) of 14 sampled residents whose care plans were reviewed. The DON identified 40 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated December 2016, read in part, .A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident . 1. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease. The annual assessment, dated 05/14/24, documented the resident received dialysis. Review of the electronic clinical record did not reveal a care plan had been developed to address end stage renal disease/dialysis with goals or interventions. On 08/13/24 at 8:32 a.m., CNA #1 stated Resident #3 was getting ready for dialysis. On 08/13/24 at 2:27 p.m., the DON reviewed the electronic clinical record and stated the previous care plan coordinator had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the urinary drainage bag was positioned in a manner to maintain infection control for two (#92 and # 6) of two sampled residents who were reviewed for urinary catheters. The Resident Matrix documented two residents who had urinary catheters. Findings: An undated policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary, read in parts .Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor . 1. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included pressure induced deep tissue damage of the right buttocks and the sacral region. On 08/13/24 at 2:00 p.m., Resident #6 was observed in bed with the urinary catheter bag on the floor. On 08/14/24 at 10:45 a.m., Resident #6 was observed in bed, lying on their left side. The urinary catheter bag was observed to be attached to the bed frame and resting on the floor. On 08/14/24 at 10:49 a.m., LPN #1 was observed to provide urinary catheter care for Resident #6. On 08/14/24 at 10:53 a.m., LPN #1 stated the catheter bag should not be on the floor and repositioned the bag. On 08/14/24 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure orders for dialysis and pre/post dialysis assessments were completed for three (#3, 22, and #27) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for dialysis. The DON identified three residents who received dialysis. Findings: The End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of a Resident with policy, dated September 2010, read in parts, .Residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care . 1. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease. The annual assessment, dated 05/14/24, documented the resident received dialysis and was cognitively intact for daily decision making. Review of the Dialysis Information forms, dated 07/01/24 through 07/31/24, revealed the following: a. The pre dialysis assessment did not document a weight two times out of 12 opportunities; b. The post dialysis assessment had been completed by dialysis staff, rather than facility staff, seven of 12 opportunities; and c. The clinical record did not contain any documentation, nor was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured one (Southwest treatment cart) and failed to ensure medications were dated when opened for two (Southwest treatment cart and North medication cart) of two medication/treatment carts and one of one medication rooms observed for medication storage. The DON identified four medication/treatment carts and one medication room in the facility. Findings: 1. On 08/11/24 at 11:00 a.m., the Southwest treatment cart was observed to be unlocked by the nursing station. RN #2 was observed to leave the unlocked cart unattended. They were asked who was responsible for the cart and they stated they had forgotten to lock it. RN #2 locked the cart and walked down the hall. On 08/13/24 at 4:08 p.m., RN #3 was observed to obtain the glucometer, blood pressure cuff, and pulse oximeter and entered room [ROOM NUMBER]. The Southwest treatment cart was unlocked and unattended by the nurse. RN #3 was asked who was responsible for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0801 — patternEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was qualified dietary staff to meet the needs of the residents. The DON identified 38 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings: On 08/12/24 at 11:30 a.m., there were two employees observed in the kitchen, a cook and a dishwasher. On 08/12/24 at 11:45 a.m., cook #1 stated there had not been a DM for more than two weeks. The previous DM had quit without notice. [NAME] #1 stated they are also short staffed on cooks and dietary aides. On 08/12/24 at 12:00 p.m., the administrator provided a list of facility managers. Review of the list identified the dietary manager position was open, no staff name was listed. On 08/13/24 at 1:00 p.m., the administrator stated they had interviews scheduled for the DM position and hoped to have a new DM by next week. They stated it has been difficult keeping dietary staff.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient dietary staff to meet the needs of the residents. The DON identified 38 residents received meals from the kitchen. Findings: On 08/14/24 at 3:34 p.m., the maintenance supervisor stated they helped in the kitchen by putting away deliveries, making plates, and cooking sometimes. They stated they have been told about portions, but have not received dietary training. They stated they do not have a food handlers card. On 08/14/24 at 3:34 p.m., the housekeeping supervisor stated they helped cook meals if the dietary staff does not know how to cook an item on the menu and they helped get meals out on time. They stated they had not received dietary training in the facility and do not currently have a food handlers card. On 08/14/24 at 4:22 p.m., the administrator stated they did not cook but helped put things away when they get food deliveries. They stated they have not gotten dietary training for the maintenance supervisor or for the housekeeping supervisor. They do not have training documentation for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable and served at appetizing temperatures for one (evening meal) of one meal observed for palatability. The DON identified 38 residents received meals from the kitchen. Findings: The Resident Council Meeting Minutes, dated 07/31/24, documented a complaint that the food was cold. On 08/11/24 at 12:03 p.m., Resident #3 stated food on the hall trays was cold and the food was not good. On 08/11/24 at 12:19 p.m., Resident #22 stated hot foods were not served hot and cold foods were not served cold. On 08/13/24 at 5:16 p.m., a test tray was received. The pizza and the fruit cocktail were observed to be room temperature. The dressed salad was on the plate with the pizza and was observed to be wilted, soggy, and room temperature. The food was not observed to be a palatable temperature. On 08/13/24 at 5:24 p.m., the administrator stated they had gotten a test tray and tasted the food. The administrator stated they were aware there was a problem with food palatability.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meat was thawed in a sanitary manner and that residents plates were delivered in a sanitary manner. The DON identified 38 residents received meals from the kitchen. Findings: On 08/11/24 at 11:20 a.m., a ten pound roll of hamburger meat was observed thawing in a sink filled with water. On 08/11/24 at 11:47 a.m., [NAME] # 3 stated meat should be thawed under cold running water or in a refrigerator. [NAME] #3 stated meat should not sit in a sink filled with water. On 08/11/24 at 1:00 p.m., the administrator stated meat should be thawed under cold running water or in the refrigerator. On 08/13/24 at 12:30 p.m., LPN #1 was observed assisting a resident into the dining room and locking the wheelchair breaks. The nurse continued delivering plates to other residents without sanitizing their hands. On 08/13/24 at 1:00 p.m., LPN #1 stated they should have sanitized their hands after delivering each plate. On 08/13/24 at 1:30 p.m., the administrator stated the staff should be sanitizing their hands after delivering each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to honor a resident's choice of dining location for one (#1) of one resident sampled for choices. The administrator identified 40 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #1 had diagnoses which included a history of traumatic brain injury. On 08/13/24 at 12:51 p.m., Resident #1 was observed being fed lunch in their room. On 08/13/24 at 2:15 p.m., CNA #3 stated Resident #1 liked to eat meals in the living room but they were told because State was in the facility Resident #1 must be fed in their room. CNA #3 asked Resident #1 if they liked to eat in the living room or in their room. The resident stated living room. On 08/13/24 at 2:16 p.m., the DON stated Resident #1 ate their meals in the living room, it was their preference. The administrator stated the resident could communicate their preference and there was no reason they must eat meals in their room.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly assessments were completed within 14 days of the ARD for one (#27) of 14 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The DON identified 40 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #27 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease. The quarterly assessment, dated 07/16/24, documented it had been completed on 08/09/24. The MDS 3.0 NH Final Validation Report, dated 08/09/24, documented the quarterly assessment had been completed more than 14 days after the ARD. On 08/14/24 at 10:47 a.m., the administrator stated the previous MDS coordinator has not been completing MDS assessments timely. They stated they had not monitored MDS assessments to ensure they were completed timely but the previous DON had monitored.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a level two PASARR was requested for one (#27) of one sampled residents who were reviewed for PASARR. The DON identified seven residents who had a diagnoses of a serious mental illness. Findings: Resident #27 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia and unspecified psychosis. The electronic health record documented the diagnoses of schizophrenia and unspecified psychosis were both present upon admission to the facility. The admission assessment, dated 01/19/24, documented the resident had a diagnoses of schizophrenia. The Nursing Facility Level of Care Assessment, dated 02/01/24, documented the primary diagnoses was sepsis and the secondary diagnoses was diabetes. The assessment read in part, .Diagnoses of serious mental illness (for example, schizophrenic, paranoid, panic, mood .or other psychotic disorder?) . The question was documented as no. Review of the electronic health record did not reveal a level two PASARR had been requested. On 08/13/24 at 11:48 a.m., documentation for the request of a level two PASARR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was reviewed for one (#141) of one sampled resident reviewed for care plans. The administrator identified 40 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Resident #141 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses which included dementia, hypertension and anxiety. On 08/11/124 at 3:10 p.m., a family member for Resident #141 was interviewed and stated they were not notified of or offered an opportunity to participate in the resident's care plan meeting. On 08/11/24 at 3:30 p.m., the Resident #141's clinical record was reviewed. There was no documentation the resident's representative participated in a care planning process. On 08/13/24 at 10:03 a.m., the social services coordinator stated they have not had a care plan meeting for Resident #141. They stated they usually did a care plan meeting within one week, but they were behind and had not had one yet.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary which included a recapitulation of the residents stay was completed for one (#39) of one sampled resident who was discharged . The DON identified 13 residents who had been discharged in the past three months. Findings: Resident #39 had diagnoses which included dementia. A physician's order, dated 05/14/24, documented the resident was discharged from skilled services to home with home health. The Discharge Summary progress note, dated 05/14/24 at 12:00 p.m., documented the Resident #39 was transported home by family with all personal belongings, medications, discharge instructions, and information regarding upcoming appointments. The progress note did not document a recapitulation of the resident's stay. On 08/12/24 at 12:14 p.m., the DON stated they assumed the MDS coordinator or the DON would complete discharge summaries. They stated they would need to find out. On 08/13/24 at 12:07 p.m., the DON stated they were not sure what information the facility's discharge summary form contained but the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure an enteral tube feeding bag was properly labeled for one (#33) of two sampled residents reviewed for tube feeding management. The Facility Matrix, identified two residents who received enteral tube feeding via continuous pump. Findings: On 08/12/24 at 10:44 a.m., Resident #33 was observed with tube feeding running at 45ml/hr. No label was observed on the tube feeding bag. On 08/13/24 at 8:42 a.m., Resident #33 was observed with tube feeding running at 45ml/hr. The hand written label, on the tube feeding bag, documented, Jevity 08/13/23 @ 0300. The resident's name or prescribed rate was not documented on the label. On 08/13/24 at 10:11 a.m., RN #1 stated by looking at the tube feeding bag they could not tell what resident it was for or the rate it should be running. RN #1 stated there should be a label on the bag with the resident's name, date, time, formula, and rate. On 08/13/24 at 11:00 a.m., the DON stated the tube feeding bag should contain a label with the resident's name, time the formula was hung, the type of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor for side effects of an anticoagulant medication and obtain hemoglobin A1C monitoring as ordered by the physician for one (#27) of five sampled residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified eight residents who received anticoagulant medications and 13 residents who were diabetic. Findings: Resident #27 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus and hypertension. A physician order, dated 01/12/24, documented the resident was ordered Eliquis (an anticoagulant medication) 2.5 mg twice daily. A physician order, dated 03/11/24, documented a hemoglobin A1C was ordered every March, June, September, and December. The Nursing Clarification/Comments form from the consultant pharmacist, dated 05/09/24, documented to monitor for side effects of Eliquis. The quarterly assessment, dated 07/16/24, documented the resident received anticoagulant and hypoglycemic medications. Review of the electronic clinical record did not reveal side effect monitoring for the use of anticoagulants had been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for one (evening meal) of two meal services observed. The DON identified 38 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Findings: An undated policy titled Menus, read in parts, .Deviations from posted menus are recorded, including the reason for the substitution and/or deviation and archived . A menu, dated April 29, June 3, July 8, August 13, and September 23, documented dinner was to be cheese pizza, tossed salad with dressing, vegetable soup, seasonal fruit cup, and milk or beverage of choice. On 08/13/24 at 5:00 p.m., vegetable soup was not observed to be served during the evening meal with pizza and salad. On 08/13/24 at 5:17 p.m., cook #2 stated they could not find vegetable soup so it was not served with the meal. On 08/13/24 at 5:26 p.m., the administrator stated the dietary staff were to notify them if they did not have an item on the menu.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were utilized for one (#6) of one sampled residents observed for infection control and failed to ensure the glucometer was disinfected between uses for three (#3, 93, and #25) of three sampled residents who were observed during glucose monitoring. The administrator identified one resident with a tracheostomy, two residents with urinary catheters, and 13 residents who required glucose monitoring. Findings: An Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated 02/28/22, read in part, The facility may expand the use of PPE and refer to the use of gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that provide opportunities for transfer of MDRO's to hands/clothing. 1. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation. On 08/14/24 at 7:31 a.m., signage was posted for EBP on Resident #6's door. LPN #1 was observed during tracheostomy care and catheter care for Resident #6. The nurse changed their gloves four times during tracheostomy care without sanitizing their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed and substitutions to the menu were reviewed and/or approved by the registered dietitian. The ADON identified 35 of 37 residents received nutrition from the kitchen. Findings: A facility menu for Tuesday 23-24 5 week - week 1 documented the lunch was Swedish meatballs with cream gravy, buttered noodles, lima beans, cornbread, butter, peach dump cake, and beverage of choice. A facility menu for Wednesday 23-24 5 week - week 1 documented the lunch was barbeque pork, baked potato, sliced zucchini, Texas toast, chocolate cake with vanilla icing, and beverage of choice. A menu substitution sheet documented the following: a. undated entry: cheese burgers were served instead of beans and ham b. undated entry: corn bread was served instead of biscuits c. undated entry: cheese sticks were served instead of crackers d. 12/22/23: Salisbury steaks were served instead of fish e. 12/24/23: grilled chicken was served instead of fried chicken f. 01/01/24: shrimp was served instead of beans an ham…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-04 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature and was palatable. The ADON identified 35 of 37 residents received nutrition from the kitchen. Findings: A facility menu for Wednesday 23-24 5 week - week 1 documented the lunch was barbeque pork, baked potato, sliced zucchini, Texas toast, chocolate cake with vanilla icing and beverage of choice. On 01/03/23 at 11:56 a.m., lunch preparation and service was observed. On 01/03/23 at 12:17 p.m., [NAME] #1 was observed removing a cake from the oven. The cook stated the cake mix was biscuit mix. They directed cook #3 to put honey on top and serve it. On 01/03/23 at 12:35 p.m., the trays for the hall left the kitchen. On 01/03/23 at 12:50 p.m., the last resident tray was delivered on the hall. A test tray was removed from the cart. On 01/03/23 at 12:52 p.m., the test tray was observed with barbeque pork, steamed zucchini, sweet potato fries, and a cake. The pork was 89.9 F, the zucchini was 92.1 F, the sweet potato fries were 90.9 F. The food on the plate was cold upon tasting.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-17 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive assessments were conducted for six (#31, 32, 81, 82, 131, and #182) of 24 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/06/23, identified 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS Scheduling Report, dated 07/17/23, read in part, .Comprehensive due .ARD: 4/23/2023 Complete by 4/23/2023 85 days overdue . Review of the electronic clinical record did not reveal an admission assessment had been completed and the entry assessment was export ready. 2. Resident #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS Scheduling Report, dated 07/17/23, read in part, .Comprehensive due .ARD: 4/20/2023 Complete by 4/20/2023 88 days overdue . Review of the electronic clinical record did not reveal an admission assessment had been completed and the entry assessment was export ready. 3. Resident #81 was admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-17 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure quarterly assessments were completed and submitted for five (#6, 9, 14, 29, and #30) of 24 sampled residents whose assessments were reviewed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/06/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #6 had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease. The MDS 3.0 Assessment History Report, dated 07/17/23, read in part, .04/28/23 .In Progress .Quarterly . 2. Resident #9 had diagnoses which included dementia. The MDS 3.0 Assessment History Report, dated 07/17/23, read in part, .04/28/23 .In Progress .Quarterly . 3. Resident #14 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The MDS 3.0 Assessment History Report, dated 07/17/23, read in part, .04/28/23 .In Progress .Quarterly . 4. Resident #29 had diagnoses which included dementia. The MDS Scheduling Report, dated 07/17/23, read in part, .Quarterly due .ARD .5/26/2023 .Complete by 6/9/2023 .38 days overdue. 5. Resident #30 had diagnoses which included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-17 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a base line care plan within the required 48 hour time frame for three (#82, 92, and #96) of three sampled residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/06/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Baseline Care Plan policy, dated 05/24/22, read in part, .The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident .The baseline care plan will .Be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission . 1. Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the clinical record did not reveal a baseline care plan had been completed. 2. Resident #92 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the clinical record did not reveal a baseline care plan had been completed. 3. Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the clinical record did not reveal a baseline care plan had been completed. On 07/17/23 at 5:55…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of a significant medication error for one (#32) of five residents reviewed for significant medication errors. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form documented 45 residents received medication. Findings: Resident #32 had diagnoses which included unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia unspecified, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. A physician order, dated 05/21/23, documented to administer Haldol Decanoate 100 mg and 50 mg IM every 28 days. A progress note, dated 05/19/23, documented the medication was not available and the pharmacy had been notified. The MAR, dated May 2023, documented Haldol Decanoate was administered on 05/22/23. The MAR, dated June 2023, documented the medication was due on 06/19/23 but had not been administered. A risk management report, dated 06/28/23, documented resident #32 hit resident #31. The anger and hitting were not preceded by any other altercation. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-17 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure lab tests were completed as ordered by the physician for two (#14 and #21) of five sampled residents whose labs were reviewed. The Regional Director of Operations identified 45 residents who had physician orders for lab services. Findings: 1. Resident #14 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus. A physician order, dated 06/19/19, read in part, .CHECK CBC .q 6 MONTHS .TSH YEARLY . A physician order, dated 04/02/21, read in part, .A1C Q 6 MONTHS . Review of the clinical record revealed the last CBC and A1C completed was on 06/08/22. On 07/17/23 at 1:28 p.m., the DON was asked how often Resident #14 was to have labs completed. They stated they would check the clinical record. On 07/17/23 at 1:57 p.m., the DON provided lab results from 2022 and 2023 and stated the A1C was ordered every three months, some labs were ordered every six months, and some were yearly. The DON stated labs had not been completed as ordered by the physician. The provided lab results did not reveal a TSH had been completed. The DON was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to be administered effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. The administration failed to ensure: a. residents were free from physical abuse and neglect. b. a safe, functional, sanitary, comfortable environment was provided. c. comprehensive assessments were completed within 14 days of admission. d. quarterly assessments were completed every three months. e. base line care plans were completed on admission. f. prepared meals were of adequate portion size, palatable, and met resident preference. g. sufficient nutritional intake to maintain health and weights. h. infection were tracked and analyzed for trend routinely. i. the facility assessment was updated with changes in resident care needs. j. resident funds were conveyed for discharged residents. k. resident to resident abuse incidents were reported to OSDH in the required time frame. l.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-17 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — patternConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment was updated yearly and reflected the resources necessary to meet the needs for the residents. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 07/06/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility, one resident received dialysis, and one resident had a tracheostomy. Findings: The Facility Assessment, dated 05/31/22, documented the facility did not have any residents who received dialysis or had a tracheostomy. Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE], had diagnoses which included end stage renal disease, and required dialysis. Resident #92 was admitted on [DATE], had diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and had a tracheostomy. On 07/07/23 at 4:43 p.m., the administrator stated the facility's resident population and their needs, related to mental illness, had changed since new ownership in April 2023. The administrator was asked when the facility assessment had last been updated to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-17 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — patternHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement plans to correct or improve identified concerns with resident care. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/06/23, documented 45 residents resided at the facility. Findings: The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement policy, dated 08/05/22, read in part, .These policies are intended to ensure the facility develops a plan that that [sic] describes the process for conducting QAPI/QAA activities, such as identifying and correcting quality deficiencies as well as opportunities for improvement . On 07/17/23 at 6:29 p.m., the administrator was asked, if prior to the survey, the facility had identified a concern regarding resident to resident abuse. They stated incidents were discussed each morning during a meeting. They stated they had not implemented anything except they had psychiatric services in place and undocumented one on one. The administrator was asked, if prior to the survey, the facility had identified a concern regarding significant/severe weight loss. They stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-17 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the QA committee met at least quarterly. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/06/23, identified 45 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: The QAA Committee policy, dated 08/05/22, read in part, .The committee must .Meet at least quarterly and as needed to coordinate and evaluate activities under the QAPI program . On 07/17/23 at 6:29 p.m., the administrator was asked when the last QA meeting had been conducted. They stated in March 2023. They stated the Medical Director had just completed reviewing the March 2023 QA information. They stated they typically held QA meeting monthly but the physician or the DON had lost the information they had compiled for the QA meetings.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infections were tracked and data was analyzed to determine trends for ten (August 2022 through June 2023) of 12 months reviewed for infection monitoring. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/06/23, identified 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Infection Control, General policy, dated 08/05/22, read in part, .Surveillance reports will include infection .data and process measure data .to the director of nursing and medical director on a monthly basis. Reports will also be reviewed by the Quality Assurance and Advisory Committee . The Antibiotic Usage Reports, dated August 2022 and September 2022, documented the name of the resident and type of infection. The Antibiotic Usage Reports, dated October 2022 and November 2022, documented the name of the resident, type of infection, and what antibiotic was ordered. The Antibiotic Usage Report, dated December 2022, documented the name of the resident and type of infection. The Antibiotic Usage Report, dated January 2023, documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-07-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary environment for three (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) of three resident rooms observed on the [NAME] hall, one (the [NAME] hall) of four halls observed, one (the MDS office) of one office observed, and one (West hall lobby) of three common areas/lobbies observed. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/06/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The Safe Environment policy, dated 08/10/22, read in part, .It is the policy of the facility to provide safe environment, in accordance with State and Federal Regulations . On 07/07/23 at 9:11 a.m., the [NAME] hall, outside of the MDS office, was observed to have a tan-discolored area approximately 12 inches long and six inches wide. On 07/07/23 at 9:19 a.m., the MDS office was observed with a bath blanket in the floor by the doorway. On 07/07/23 at 10:53 a.m., the MDS coordinator was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-07-17 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure conveyance of personal funds within 30 days of discharge/death for two (#95 and #99) of three sampled residents who were reviewed for personal funds. The Regional Director of Operations identified eight residents who had been discharged /expired in the past three months who were in the trust account. Findings: 1. Resident #95 was discharged from the facility on [DATE]. The Trust Current Account Balance form, dated [DATE], documented the resident had a balance of $1,598.44. 2. Resident #99 was discharged from the facility on [DATE]. The Trust Current Account Balance form, dated [DATE], documented the resident had a balance of $2926.31. On [DATE] at 12:30 p.m., the business office manager was asked who was responsible to ensure personal funds were conveyed within 30 days of discharge/death. They stated if they were aware a resident had been discharged or expired they would ensure the funds were conveyed. They were asked why the personal funds for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was reported to OSDH for one (#31) of three sampled residents reviewed for allegations of abuse. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 07/06/23, documented 45 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An undated form titled, Abuse Policy and Procedure, documented in part, .We will endeavor to protect our occupants from maltreatment, which means .physical abuse .It recognizes resident rights to be free from physical or mental abuse .All allegations of resident maltreatment, including .abuse .shall be promptly reported to Administrator and investigated by the Facility management. Administrator will immediately report the allegation to the Oklahoma State Department of Health and the Local Police . Resident #31 has diagnoses which include MERRF, (a multisystem mitochondrial syndrome characterized by progressive myoclonus and seizures). The resident is 5'11 and weighs 124 lbs. The resident is non ambulatory and uses a wheelchair. Resident #32 has diagnoses which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-17 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure transportation to dialysis for one (#6) of one sampled resident reviewed for dialysis services. The Resident Census and Condition form, dated 07/03/23, documented one resident for dialysis treatment. Findings: An undated policy tilted Nursing Home Dialysis Transfer Agreement, read in part, .Facility shall have the responsibility for arranging suitable transportation of the Designated Resident to and from Center, including the selection of the mode of transportation, qualified personnel to accompany the Designated Resident .Facility shall be responsible for, and shall provide the necessary personnel for, assisting the Designated Resident in entering into and exiting from Center Resident #6 had diagnoses which include end stage renal disease. A physician order, dated 03/13/23, read in part, dialysis .every Monday Wednesday and Friday . The TAR documented the resident did not have dialysis on 4/28/23, 05/10/23, 05/17/23, or 07/03/23. On 07/17/23 at 01:29 p.m., the DON stated the resident goes in the transport van, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$113,588 in federal fines across 14 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $53,957 — penalty dated 2024-08-10
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-21
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-21 for 9 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KILGORE, JOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 01/26/2024 |
| 601CH, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2016 |
| DWUMA, ALEX | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2016 |
| JONES, NOLA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/17/2025 |
| KILGORE FAMILY TRUST-2012 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2016 |
| KTFW-OK, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/01/2016 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $15K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OK
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375470. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.