Shanoan Springs Nursing and Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 51.6 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.26 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.68 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  On 03/24/26, a past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to have existed related to the facility's failure to ensure Res #3 received a mechanically soft diet without bread per physician order. Res #3 was provided a grilled cheese sandwich and side salad for an evening meal, which resulted in a choking episode requiring emergency services.On 03/24/26 at 3:15 p.m., the OSDH was notified and verified the existence of the past noncompliance IJ related to the facility's failure to ensure residents received physician ordered therapeutic diets.On 03/24/26 at 3:28 p.m., the administrator was notified of the immediate jeopardy situation.Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a physician ordered mechanical soft diet without bread for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for therapeutic diets.The dietary manager identified 22 residents received therapeutic diets.Findings:On 03/23/26 at 11:35 a.m., dietary staff were observed preparing residents' lunch trays. Nursing staff were observed verifying the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure advanced directives were sent with a resident during a transfer for 1 (#205) of 1 sampled residents reviewed for appropriate documentation sent to receiving provider. The administrator identified 49 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A policy Transfer or Discharge, Information for Receiving Provider, dated 2001, read in part, Should a resident be transferred to another facility or discharged to the care of another provider, the following information is communicated to the receiving facility or provider .Advance directive information. On 02/01/25, a nurses note showed Resident #205 was transferred out to a hospital due to labored breathing and coughing up thick green phlegm. On 02/06/25, a nurses note showed hospital staff called Shanoan Springs to request a copy of the medications that were in effect at the time of the transfer to the ER on [DATE]. On 02/10/25, a nurses note showed hospital staff called Shanoan Springs to request a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper personal protective equipment was used for 1 (#42) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions. The administrator identified 19 residents resided in the facility required enhanced barrier precautions. Findings: On 05/29/25 at 9:10 a.m., LPN #1 was observed to enter Resident #42's room to administer medications via enteral tube. LPN #1 did not don PPE prior to administering the medications via enteral tube. An undated policy Enhanced Barrier Precautions, read in part, Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms .Enhanced Barrier Precautions involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities. A policy Administering Medications Through an Enteral Tube, revised 11/2008, read in part, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guideline for the safe administration of medications through an enteral tube .The following equipment and supplies will be necessary when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility identified 48 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: 1. On 04/15/24 at at 8:21 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made. [NAME] # 1 was observed to take the trash out of the trash can and the trash was taken outside. [NAME] #1 was observed to return to the kitchen and did not wash their hands. [NAME] #1 placed a lid on the chicken, which was on the prep counter in marinade, and then placed the container in the refrigerator. [NAME] #1 was then observed to cover a bowl of cream cheese with plastic wrap, and then placed individual containers of butter into a bowl. Hand washing was not observed during this observation. On 04/15/24 at 8:30 a.m., the following was observed in the refrigerator: Opened containers of Thick and Easy drinks were not dated with an open date An opened bottle of water, with some water missing, in the refrigerator and did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered to formulate an advance directive, or implemented the choice to formulate an advanced directive, for three (#8, 20, and #42) and posted the correct information regarding code status for one (#2) for 24 residents reviewed for advance directives. The administrator identified 50 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #8 had diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, COPD, and chronic pain. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/27/24, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition and required partial to moderate assistance with most ADLs. On 04/15/24 at 10:55 a.m., a green name tag, indicating full code status, was observed by the resident room. 04/16/24 at 9:00 a.m., the residents advance directive acknowledgment form was provided. The undated form documented the resident had an advance directive. The AD acknowledgment form was signed by the resident. The resident did not have an AD in the EHR or in the hard chart. On 04/16/24 at 9:20 a.m., the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appetizing temperature. The facility identified 48 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. Findings: 1. On 04/17/24 at 11:00 a.m., the menu was observed and documented the noon meal was to have been french onion pork chops, pork gravy, white cheddar mac and cheese, green peas, wheat dinner roll, margarine, apple [NAME], milk, and coffee. On 04/17/24 at 11:10 a.m., [NAME] #1 was observed to obtain the temperature of the pork chops when they were removed form the oven. The temperature at that time was 184 degrees F. The pork chops were place in a deep pan and then placed on the steam table. The other food items were not observed to be temped before placing on the steam table. On 04/17/24 at 12:01 p.m., the meal service started. The steam table was not temped before service started. On 04/17/24 at 12:20 p.m., the DM stated they should have temped the food on the steam table before serving the meal. The DM stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. wound care was provided in a sanitary manner for one (#20) of four residents observed for wound care, b. residents' catheters were not dragging on the floor for two (#8 and #26) of four sampled resident who had catheters, and c. a water management program was implemented to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the buildings water system. The facility identified a census of 50 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #8 had diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus, personal history of urinary tract infections, and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. A care plan, last revised 10/18/23 documented the resident has a suprapubic catheter for neurogenic bladder. The care plan documented to keep the catheter bag below the bladder level and monitor for sign and symptoms of UTI. The care plan documented the resident was on enhanced precautions required due to Res #8 was at an increased risk for infection and MDRO related to indwelling medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported within two hours of the reported incident for one (#8) of three residents sampled for abuse. The administrator identified 50 residents residing in the facility. Findings: A facility policy titled Reporting Abuse to Facility Management, dated April 2012, read in part, .The Administrator or Director of Nursing Services must be immediately notified of suspected abuse or incidents of abuse. If such incidents occur or are discovered after hours, the Administrator and Director of Nursing Services must be called at home or paged and informed of such incident . Res #8 had diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, COPD, and chronic pain. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/27/24, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition and required partial to moderate assistance with most ADLs. On 04/15/24 at 2:40 p.m., Res #8 stated stated yesterday a nurse said the F word at them and it hurt their feelings. The resident stated they told other staff member but did not know their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments were accurate for two (#8 and #20) of 13 sampled residents whose resident assessments were reviewed. The administrator identified 50 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: 1. Res #8 had diagnoses which included anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia. A quarterly assessment, dated 03/27/24, documented the resident was moderately impaired with cognition. The assessment documented the resident received an antipsychotic, antianxiety, and an antidepressant medication. The assessment documented a GDR had been attempted on 10/06/23. On 04/18/24 at 10:57 a.m., the MDS coordinator stated they were brand new to the MDS position as of September of 2023. The MDS coordinator stated they found the date on a psychiatric consultation progress note for September and it had been signed and dated on 10/06/23. On 04/18/24 at 11:36 a.m., the DON stated on 09/18/24 the psychiatrist came to the facility and made changes in the resident's medication. They stated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to refer a resident with a new mental health diagnosis to OHCA for a PASRR level II evaluation for one (#2) of one sampled residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings: A PASRR level I was provided by another facility that was transferring services to this facility, dated 06/30/10, documented Res #2 had diagnoses including multiple sclerosis, neurogenic bladder, paraplegia, sebaceous cysts, and [NAME]-[NAME] syndrome. Res #2 was admitted on [DATE] after being transferred from another facility, and had diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis, [NAME]-[NAME] syndrome, neurogenic bladder, paraplegia, sebaceous cysts, dementia in other diseases with agitation, delusional disorder, cognitive communication deficit, and dementia with behavioral disturbances. A significant change assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident was severely impaired with cognition and diagnosed with psychotic disorder. A care plan revised on 08/14/23, documented the resident had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplements were given to one (#49) of two residents reviewed for weight loss. The DON identified 50 residents residing in the facility. Findings: Resident #49 was admitted with diagnoses including diffuse traumatic brain injury and hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration and need for assistance with personal care. The resident was also admitted with a gastric tube. A physician's order on 03/28/24 documented enteral feed TwoCal HN four times a day via gastric tube. On 04/02/24 a dietitian recommended the resident be given TwoCal HN five times a day via gastric tube. There was no documentation of the physician being notified of this dietitian recommendation. On 04/17/24 at 11:01 a.m., the ADON stated the dietitian would examine each resident remotely and send the recommendations to their email. They also stated there are times when we miss those recommendation related to not looking at our emails. On 04/17/24 at 11:07 a.m., the DON stated they did not see the note from the dietitian.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2026-03-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $389K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK